Research with the aggregated user data
45 views
Skip to first unread message
Christian Kleineidam
May 31, 2012, 10:19:41 AM5/31/12
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
Dear all,
from the website: "Supermemo now uses SM11. However, we are a bit skeptical that the huge complexity of the newer SM algorithms provides for a statistically relevant benefit. But, that is one of the facts we hope to find out with our data collection."
Mnemosyne should now have a few years worth of data. Is there somewhere a published analysis of the Mnemosyne data? Is the data open in the sense that everybody can analyze it or can only the people behind the project analyze the gathered data?
Greetings,
Christian
Peter Bienstman
May 31, 2012, 10:34:26 AM5/31/12
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 07:19:41 AM Christian Kleineidam wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> from the website: "Supermemo now uses SM11. However, we are a bit skeptical
> that the huge complexity of the newer SM algorithms provides for a
> statistically relevant benefit. But, that is one of the facts we hope to
> find out with our data collection."
>
> Mnemosyne should now have a few years worth of data. Is there somewhere a
> published analysis of the Mnemosyne data?
I have not yet gotten the time to look into this, preferring to focus on 2.0
> Dear all,
>
> from the website: "Supermemo now uses SM11. However, we are a bit skeptical
> that the huge complexity of the newer SM algorithms provides for a
> statistically relevant benefit. But, that is one of the facts we hope to
> find out with our data collection."
>
> Mnemosyne should now have a few years worth of data. Is there somewhere a
> published analysis of the Mnemosyne data?
instead,
> Is the data open in the sense
> that everybody can analyze it or can only the people behind the project
> analyze the gathered data?
scary dataset, though.
In the archives, you can find some reports of people who have tried to look ino
this.
Cheers,
Peter
Christian Kleineidam
May 31, 2012, 11:15:44 AM5/31/12
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:34:26 PM UTC+2, Peter Bienstman wrote:
Sure, give me an ftp site, and I'll dump the data there. It's a really big,
scary dataset, though.
What size are we roughly talking about? These days "big" can mean many things.
Peter Bienstman
May 31, 2012, 11:57:17 AM5/31/12
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
2 Gb, I think.
Peter
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/1ssQfM_QTVgJ.
> To post to this group, send email to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> mnemosyne-proj-u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
>
>
Peter
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/1ssQfM_QTVgJ.
> To post to this group, send email to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> mnemosyne-proj-u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
>
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages