nested tags

[Murray James Morrison]

Hi Peter,

Is it possible with Mnemosyne 2, at present, to use tags to create nested categories?

e.g. Chinese >> Grammar >> 是…的

If not, will it be possible to nest preexisting tags in the future. Say an old card has three tags: Chinese, Grammar and 是…的. Could we put them in a hierarchical relationship?

--murrayjames

--
=================
Murray James Morrison
Saxophonist, Composer, Music Educator

Tel.: +86-18608001531 (China)

Google+: gplus.to/murrayjames

Website: http://www.murrayjames.net

[Peter Bienstman]

Hi,

Use:

Chinese::Grammar::是…的

This info is in the tips of the day and the contextual help, but I guess you
haven't run across it yet :-)

Peter

On Thursday, February 23, 2012 03:27:20 PM Murray James Morrison wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Is it possible with Mnemosyne 2, at present, to use tags to create nested
> categories?
>
> e.g. Chinese >> Grammar >> 是…的
>
> If not, will it be possible to nest preexisting tags in the future. Say an
> old card has three tags: Chinese, Grammar and 是…的. Could we put them in a
> hierarchical relationship?
>
> --murrayjames
--

Peter Bienstman
Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology
Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93
WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be
email: Peter.B...@UGent.be

[Murray James Morrison]

Or I haven't been paying attention :-) Works perfect, thanks!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mnemosyne-proj-u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.

[Dougie Nisbet]

On 23/02/2012 07:40, Peter Bienstman wrote:
> This info is in the tips of the day and the contextual help, but I guess you
> haven't run across it yet :-)
>

BTW, searching on tags, within the card browser, I find the search
facility erratic. Sometimes it misses cards, and sometimes it only
matches the top level or sub-level.

e.g. toptag::subtag

searching for 'toptag' doesn't show all the nested 'subtag' cards.

Also searching on some other part of the card, e.g. a part of the
question, will often match, even though the searchexpr is not in the tag.

[Peter Bienstman]

By searching for a tag, you mean checking the checkbox in the tag tree, right?
The text box where you can type is just for contents of the cards. See the
headings: Show cards from these card types ... having any of these tags ...
containing this text.

In any case, do send me your database and concrete examples of what goes
wrong.

Peter

[Dougie Nisbet]

On 23/02/2012 08:57, Peter Bienstman wrote:
> The text box where you can type is just for contents of the cards.

ah .. I've got it now. Yes, that would explain what I'm seeing.

Dougie

[Peter Bienstman]

I'll change 'containing this text' to 'containing this text in the cards'.
That should make it more clearer.

Thanks for the feedback!

Peter