Myth of the ~Moderate Muslim

[raykeller]

http://townhall.com/columnists/mattbarber/2016/01/03/myth-of-the-moderate-muslim-n2099101

Myth of the~Moderate Muslim
Matt Barber | Jan 03, 2016




When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them.
Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.

The Quran, Surah 9:5


When it comes to the global scourge of orthodox Islam, the Western world,
which Islamists expressly seek to destroy from within,


is an upside-down realm wherein objective facts, logic and reason must yield
to multiculturalist make-believe, progressive propaganda and political
correctness run amok.


Faithful Muslims want to kill you, and

Faithless progressives seem all too happy to help them along.


Fact: Islam is about control. The word itself means submission.


It is a socio-political pseudo-religion based upon the incoherent
scribblings of one man, the prophet Muhammad, a warring tyrant who, as even
the Quran concedes, was a murderous misogynist and pedophile.


Muhammad taught, and the Quran stresses, that a central tenet of Islam is to
convert, enslave or kill the infidel. An infidel is anyone who is not Muslim
or, depending on whoā?Ts doing the killing, belongs to a different sect of
Islam.


Those who fall into that elusive, perpetually mute category tagged moderate
Muslim are also infidels. They're bad Muslims and so, according to the
Quran, not Muslims at all.

...

[Topaz]

If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.

The Jewish controlled media said that the Jews were America's only
friends in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews,
America didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.

Jewish-Zionist Power in America
Mark Weber - Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNLIy7gckro

A factual, reasoned 16-minute talk on the immense power and influence
of the "Jewish lobby" in the US, and its harmful role, especially in
directing US Middle East policy. As long as this power remains
entrenched, says Weber, there will be no end to the Jewish-Zionist
domination of American political life and the mass media, Zionist
oppression of Palestinians, the Israeli threat to peace, and the
bloody conflict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East.

Overwhelming Evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job, Who did it and Why
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfXecU3v-70




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[Frank]

On 1/4/2016 6:19 PM, coo...@loon.com wrote:

> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:38:04 -0600, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>

> Most people can't write straight unless their paper is ruled, Topaz.
>
> What Jews have to do with paper ruling isn't really pertinent to
> anything--is it?
>
>

Posts like Kellers bring out the nut jobs.
I would tell him to read a translation of the Koran and report back to us.

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/4/2016 3:38 PM, Topaz wrote:
>
> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.

It doesn't male any difference whom you associate with. The Islamic
scumbags will still murder folks that are not Islamic scumbags.

--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster

[AXBJR░ Ｍｉｇｈｔｙ ░ Ｗａｎｎａｂｅ ░PFISh]

The Koran is rather lame compared to the horrible shit in the Old
Testament (the Torah).

Have you read the Old Testament? I have.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

On 01/04/2016 10:10 PM, PaxPerPoten wrote:
> On 1/4/2016 3:38 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>
>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>
> It doesn't male any difference whom you associate with. The Islamic
> scumbags will still murder folks that are not Islamic scumbags.
>

They kill other Middle Eastern people for being Christians....

--
That's Karma

[rbowman]

On 01/04/2016 08:17 PM, AXBJR░ Ｍｉｇｈｔｙ ░ Ｗａｎｎａｂｅ ░PFISh wrote:
> The Koran is rather lame compared to the horrible shit in the Old
> Testament (the Torah).
>
> Have you read the Old Testament? I have.

Were you wearing nitrile gloves so you didn't get shit under your
fingernails?

[Cruzing to the White House, Trumping the Libs]

=?UTF-8?B?QVhCSlLilpEg77yt772J772H772I772U772ZIOKWkSDvvLfvvYHvvY7vvY4=?= =?
UTF-8?B?772B772C772FIOKWkVBGSVNo?= <XJ...@ldIrd.com> wrote in
news:YAGiy.53307$Sn4....@fx44.iad:

And didn't understand a syllable.

--
Notice: This poster is politically incorrect. I say 'Merry Christmas,' 'God
bless America.' I salute our flag and give thanks to our troops, police
officers and firefighters. If this offends you, you are welcome to leave.
In God we trust. All others, fuck off.

[NdrWV⚛← Ｍｉｇｈｔｙ ╬ Ｗａｎｎａｂｅ →⚛HxvZo]

Cruzing to the White House, Trumping the Libs wrote on 05/01/2016 00:47:
> =?UTF-8?B?QVhCSlLilpEg77yt772J772H772I772U772ZIOKWkSDvvLfvvYHvvY7vvY4=?= =?
> UTF-8?B?772B772C772FIOKWkVBGSVNo?= <XJ...@ldIrd.com> wrote in
> news:YAGiy.53307$Sn4....@fx44.iad:
>
>> Frank wrote on 04/01/2016 18:35:
>>> On 1/4/2016 6:19 PM, coo...@loon.com wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:38:04 -0600, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>>>>
>>>> Most people can't write straight unless their paper is ruled, Topaz.
>>>>
>>>> What Jews have to do with paper ruling isn't really pertinent to
>>>> anything--is it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Posts like Kellers bring out the nut jobs.
>>> I would tell him to read a translation of the Koran and report back to
> us.
>>
>>
>> The Koran is rather lame compared to the horrible shit in the Old
>> Testament (the Torah).
>>
>> Have you read the Old Testament? I have.
>
>
> And didn't understand a syllable.

There are no vowels in the written Hebrew alphabet. No vowels, hence no
syllables. What's your point?

[Frank]

All the shit's in his head.

[Cruzing to the White House, Trumping the Libs]

=?UTF-8?B?TmRyV1bimpvihpAg77yt772J772H772I772U772ZIOKVrCDvvLfvvYHvvY4=?=
=?UTF-8?B?772O772B772C772FIOKGkuKam0h4dlpv?= <xX...@SSDFv.com> wrote in
news:b4Jiy.40047$mK.2...@fx04.ams1:

That the saddestk thing about ignorance is that it frequently doesn't know
what it doesn't know. Even when it's pretending that it does.

I suspect that in high school you spent a lot of time hanging by your
underwear.

[Frank]

He changes his name more often than he changes his underwear.

[Frank]

On 1/4/2016 10:10 PM, PaxPerPoten wrote:
> On 1/4/2016 3:38 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>
>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>
> It doesn't male any difference whom you associate with. The Islamic
> scumbags will still murder folks that are not Islamic scumbags.
>

Sunni and Shia Muslims murder each other too.

I heard one peaceful Muslim say that their religion is in need of a
reformation and those that did not support it were part of the problem

[raykeller]

"Frank" <"frank "@frank.net> wrote in message
news:n6h1m3$jmr$1...@dont-email.me...

Lying to infidels is part of thier religion - It's called Taqia

[Frank]

No question that Islam is a fundamentally flawed religion. It is only
peaceful for its followers and the Sunni Shia schism started shortly
after Mo died. If the religion can't evolve it should be eliminated.

[Topaz]

Vice President Joe Biden said:

"Jewish heritage has shaped who we are - all of us - as much or more
than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that's a fact," Biden
told a gathering of Jewish leaders on May 21 in Washington, DC. "The
truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such
an essential part of who we are that it's fair to say that Jewish
heritage is American heritage," he also said.

Biden knows what's he talking about. He was a US Senator for 26 years,
held important posts in Congress, and was twice a US presidential
candidate. Few men have been more deeply involved in Washington
politics, or are more intimately familiar with the realities of power
in American public life.

Even though Jews make up only one or two percent of the US population,
the Jewish role in American cultural and political life has been
"outsized" and "immense," Biden said.

"You make up eleven percent of the seats in the United States
Congress," he told his Jewish audience. He might also have mentioned
that three of the nine members of the US Supreme Court are Jewish, and
that Jews are vastly overrepresented in other high-level federal,
state and city government posts, including chairman of the Federal
Reserve System, and as the mayors of America's three most populous
cities.

"The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has
had such an outsized influence per capita," he also said. Biden went
on to speak about the Jewish role in shaping popular attitudes with
regard to race relations, the role of women in society, and "gay
rights," and thereby in changing policies, laws and behavior.

"I believe what affects the [social- political] movements in America,
what affects our attitudes in America, are as much the culture and the
arts as anything else ... It wasn't anything we [politicians]
legislatively did," he went on. "It was [such television shows as]
'Will and Grace,' it was the social media. Literally. That's what
changed peoples' attitudes. That's why I was so certain that the vast
majority of people would embrace, and rapidly embrace" same-sex
marriage.

"Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes,
whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish
leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is
immense," he said.

[Topaz]

Kola's little 80-page pamphlet has become the vade mecum of the
holohucksters. Whenever anyone points out the complete absence of any
evidence of mass graves at any of the infamous "death camps," the
hucksters today proudly point to Kola's "report." No graves at
Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, Buchenwald, Dachau, Sachsenhausen,
etc., but Kola reports on human remains found at little Belzec. After
more than fifty years of diligent digging anywhere and everywhere the
Germans were known to operate, holocaust promoters think they finally
have something resembling a holocaust--someone finally found a grave,
and the victims might be Jews killed by Germans.

But something seems a little fishy. Rabbi Avi Weiss, for example,
noted that the Holocaust Memorial Museum sponsored Kola, but now
Kola's little book "has disappeared without a trace from the museum's
catalog and is now virtually unobtainable." ("Disturbing
Developments," http://www.amchacjc.org/articles/articles18.cfm ,
June 23, 2004).

Nevertheless, some revisionists and deniers have managed to get
their hands on Kola's holy work and found some interesting surprises,
not the least of which is what the book does not contain: credible
supporting evidence.

Kola was supposed to be conducting an archeological excavation.
His highly touted report should contain some supporting evidence, not
just statements. Couldn't the Holocaust Memorial Museum afford a
cheap camera? Kola describes his grid and the core samples taken.
But not a photograph of the excavation can be found in the book, not
one of the 1700 bore holes, only drawings, and poor drawings at that.
No photographs of either the diggings or the core samples.

No laboratory reports either: Kola says his drawings show human
remains cut out of the fifty-year-old buried organic matter found
under the surface, and we just have to take his word for it as though
no one can ever doubt the existence of human bodies in the holocaust.
The readers are not even offered a photograph of the remains.

Actually, there are photographs in the book: photographs of a
plastic Star of David, some spoons, buttons, padlocks, and horseshoes.
Horseshoes??!! What the hell were horseshoes doing at a "death camp?"
And why the hell would Kola take pictures of them? Why would these
people take pictures of spoons, padlocks, and horsehoes and not even
offer one picture of the cross section of even one core sample
containing what they claim to be human remains? Wasn't that the
central aim of the expedition?

And what did Kola do with the sacred "remains?" Did he just throw
them into the garbage? Kola doesn't say. He just tells us he found
remains in different stages of decay. No Rabbi was present, no
chanting, no prayers, no tearing of garments; just gouging out a few
chunks of what we are told was human flesh and bones from under the
ground and moving on to the next bore-hole.

You see, according to Kola, he wasn't really trying to locate the
place were bodies were located, he was trying to locate the place
where bodies were not located. Why? Well, believe it or not, the
holocaust promoters were planning to dig a deep trench all the way
across this holy of holies, this ground containing 600,000 - 800,000
dead Jews, this ground consecrated far beyond anyone's power to add or
detract.

The Jews themselves wanted to gouge out a ditch right across the
entire camp known as Belzec, right across the alleged mass grave where
600,000 - 800,000 Jews were allegedly murdered. Kola's job was to
bore 1700 holes all over the place at Belzec to find where such a
ditch could be dug without "disturbing" the sacred remains of the
Jews. If you believe all that, you might as well believe Kola.

[Topaz]

By Dr. Lippschitz

I grew up as a Jew. I know how the Jews think. Jews shudder before
anything that smacks of Americana. Home-Schooling for instance is
largely an American-Christian Movement and Jews can't relate to it at
all. But American Christians who have been at the vanguard of the Home
Schooling Movement simply don't want their 6 year old children to see
videos of two men holding hands and kissing, as shown in the public
schools in their promotion of perverse homosexual anal sex.
But the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), a Jewish-run
organization, Click Here & especially Click Here, promotes homosexual
& lesbian perversity in our nation's public schools. Ron Paul,
obviously, is against this Jewish homosexual agenda aimed at
undermining the morals of our American youth, as outlined in their
Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion.
Let's take the Immigration issue that Ron Paul rails against. Jews
were the ones who have been pushing for open immigration ever since
the early 1900s. In 1965, the Jew Jacob Javits, then Senator of New
York, led the passing of the Open Immigration Law which brought in
millions upon millions from Third World nations.
Javits' Jewish supporters, (millions upon millions of them), cheered
him on
when he said before the Jew-owned television cameras, "Let's open up
the
floodgates!" See: Jewish Conspiracy Behind The Open Immigration Law
Here's what Ron Paul has to say about Open Immigration:
"The much-vaunted Senate "compromise" on immigration is a compromise
of our sovereignty. Today, the majority of Americans want immigration
reduced.
The cultural and political situation was very different 100 years
ago." -
See: Ron Paul's Statements
Indeed! - The "cultural and political" situation was very different
100 years ago. Once upon a time we had a Christian consensus and
Gentile American Christians running our nation. But the Jews run our
nation today. And the Jews want nothing more than to destroy
Christian culture in America.

"AMERICAN" CANDIDATES LIKE RON PAUL
ARE TOO "AMERICAN" FOR THE JEWS
JEWS CAN'T RELATE to American-patriot candidates like Ron Paul. In
other words, Ron Paul is just too "American" and too "Christian" for
Jewish tastes. And Patriotism & Christianity go hand in hand. Why?
Because this once great former Christian nation of ours (now a Jewish
nation) was founded on European Christian culture and a Christian
world view. And Ron Paul epitomizes just that!
Jews run the Media. Any American with half a brain knows this. The
Jews will only promote on their ABCs, and NBCs, and CBSs, those
candidates that say what they permit them to say. Rudy Giuliani says
what the Jews like to hear about Israel and immigration laws.
You see, Rudy Giuliani is married to a Jew. Her name is Judith Nathan.
She is Rudy Giuliani's 3rd wife. This is not too "American." But the
Jews love it and will have Carte Blanche with lox & bagels on top in a
Giuliani-Nathan White House.

CAN THE "AMERICAN" CANDIDATE RON PAUL STOP THE JEWS?
RON PAUL HAS AN UPHILL battle ahead of him. Many are saying that the
Jewish Press is laying low on Ron Paul for now. It's just too soon for
the Jews of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times and
Newsweek and Time Magazine to start smearing Ron Paul.
But the Jews who smeared the Christian candidate Pat Buchanan, a
conservative, whom they labeled an "extremist," are in their
consulting rooms now planning their strategy. My hunch is that the
"Anti-American" Jews, that is, the "Anti-Christian" Jews of the media
will start calling Ron Paul a "right wing reactionary."
You see my dear friends, Jews use terms like "reactionary,"
"extremist," "fascist," and "racist," to form a negative public
opinion of those that threaten their hegemony on US politics.
But soon, very soon, all Americans who love this nation, and who will
not let the Jews destroy it, will turn the finger-pointing-smears of
the Jews towards them, saying, "Hey Jews! You are the "reactionaries."
You are the "extremists." You are the "racists." Go back into you
synagogues, shut up, and leave us alone!

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:i6co8bl90tpn6bbgh...@4ax.com:

> "Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes,
> whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish
> leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is
> immense," he said.

Alex, you continue to charge Gentiles with the crime of being too stupid to
govern themselves.

How long, Americans must ask, have you held this seething hatred for
Gentile Americans?

--
Obama Nine Hours Before Paris Terror Attack: "We've Contained ISIS." ISIS:
"We've contained Obama."

"Never underestimate the willingness of white progressives to be offended
on behalf of people who aren’t and to impose their will on those who didn’t
ask for it." (Derek Hunter)

"No doubt Hillary would like to call [Paula] Jones a liar, but Bill paid
Jones $850,000 to settle her sexual harassment suit. Can you imagine the
fun Donald Trump, for one, would have with that? Plus, it was Bill Clinton,
not Paula Jones, who was found by the presiding federal judge to have
committed perjury."--John Hinderaker

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6eco8btj17cce6ajn...@4ax.com:

> Kola's little 80-page pamphlet has become the vade mecum of the
> holohucksters. Whenever anyone points out the complete absence of any
> evidence of mass graves at any of the infamous "death camps," the

http://www.nizkor.org

[Topaz]

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:10:28 -0600, PaxPerPoten <P...@USA.org> wrote:

>On 1/4/2016 3:38 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>
>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>
>It doesn't male any difference whom you associate with. The Islamic
>scumbags will still murder folks that are not Islamic scumbags.

By abd allah

Under the Islamic law, non-Muslim minorities received rights and
privileges that other minorities did not have under any other law in
any other country. The relationship between the Muslim community and
the non-Muslim minority is based on Allah's rule that says: {Allah
forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your)
Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly
with them: for Allah loveth those who are just.}[Al-Mumtahanah: 9].


This verse has identified the ethical and legal basis, with which
Muslims must treat non-Muslims, namely kindness and justice with all
those who do not have enmity against them.


The Islamic law has ensured several rights and privileges for non-
Muslim minorities. Perhaps the most important of which is the freedom
of belief, which is stated in Allah's saying: {There is no coercion
in religion}[Al-Baqarah: 256]. This was also reflected in the
Prophet's
(peace be upon him) letter to the People of the Scripture in Yemen
where he invited them to Islam. He (peace be upon him) said: "=85and a
Jew or a Christian who embraces Islam becomes one of the believers,
having their rights and duties; and the one who remains Jewish or
Christian should not be forced to disband his religion.."[1]


As the Islamic law allowed non-Muslims to enjoy the freedom of
belief, it enacted rules to preserve their lives, on the ground that
they are
human beings who have the right to life and existence. In this
regard, the Prophet (peace be upon him) says: "whoever kills a
contracting
man(a non-Muslim protected by the state or an agreement) he will not
smell the Paradise".[2]


Warning against doing non-Muslims injustice The Prophet (peace be upon
him) warned against commitment of injustice against non-Muslims and
diminishment of their rights. He vowed to be the opponent of their
aggressors. He said: "Beware, if anyone wrongs
A contracting man, or diminishes his right, or forces him to work
beyond his capacity, or takes from him anything without his consent, I
shall plead for him on the Day of Judgment."[3]

[1] Abu-Ubayd: Al-Amwal, p 28; Ibn Zinjwih: Al-Amwal, 1/109; Ibn
Hisham, Al-Sirah Al-Nabawiyah, 2/588; Ibn Kathir: Al-Sirah Al-
Nabawiyah, 5/146. Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani said: Ibn Zinjwih narrated it
in Al-Amwal on the authority of Al-Nadr ibn Shumayl on the authority
of Awf on the authority of Al-Hasan; see: Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani's Al-
Talkhis Al-Habir, 4/315.


[2] Narrated by Al-Bukhari on the authority of Abdullah ibn Amr,
chapter of Al-Jiziyah (tribute paid by non-Muslims) (2995), Abu-Dawud
(2760), and Al-Nasa'i (4747).


[3] Narrated by Abu-Dawud, chapter of Al-Kharaj (tribute) (3052), and
Al-Bayhaqi (18511). Al-Albani said correct; see: Al-Silsilah Al-
Sahihah (445).

[Topaz]

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:49:02 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty <"Liberalism has
been exposed as a never ending stream of

contradictions"@nexus.nebulax.com> wrote:



>They kill other Middle Eastern people for being Christians....

Christmas in Iran
Mehr News Agency (Iran)
http://www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1781758
The Iranian Christian minority in Isfahan and Tehran celebrated the
New Year's Day on Thursday, Jan. 1, 2013, during a religious ceremony
in churches. Islam has called Muslims to respect the rights of
religious minorities in countries with a Muslim majority, and in Iran,
Muslims have had peaceful relations with Christians and Jews.
Religious minorities enjoy full freedom in practice of their religious
ceremonies ...

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:2jco8btggrkcvlnq0...@4ax.com:

> I grew up as a Jew. I know how the Jews think. Jews shudder before
> anything that smacks of Americana. Home-Schooling for instance is
> largely an American-Christian Movement and Jews can't relate to it at

Alex, when will you get over your hatred of evil-but-vastly-superior Jews,
and your equal hatred of Gentiles, whom you continue to insist are stupid
and inferior?

It is clear, from reading your Holocaust denial vitriol and racist, anti-
semitic screeds, that YOU are inferior and stupid, but it is obviously
unfair to assume from your own inferiority and your own stupidity that ALL
Gentiles are equally stupid and inferior.

Get a grip, lad.

[Topaz]

http://www.tomatobubble.com

The War on Whites - being waged by Jewish Supremacists and their
controlled Black & Brown agents, is indeed very real and getting
scarier by the day. But because GOP Whites are forbidden by the gods
of political correctness to talk about those groups, Muslims / Arabs
become an easy target for those Whites too afraid to speak against the
"protected groups". In the field of Psychology, this phenomenon is
referred to as "Displaced Aggression".

The unwritten laws of liberal "Political Correctness" protect Blacks,
Browns, Asians, Jews, women, queers, handicapped and now, trannies.
Muslims, on the other hand, in spite of the Slimes' phony show of
compassion, are not protected by the invisible Jewish shield of "PC".
Victimized Whites and Christians can therefore take out ALL of their
frustrations against Muslims and Arabs.

Please see this very important youtube video:

[Topaz]

There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.

Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":

"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."

"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."

"When Matsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."

Here is a quote from Steven Spielberg, "film is the greatest weapon
in the world".

Jewish control of the media:
MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and
chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American
Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.
LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David
Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory
Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers,
appointed by Clinton.
JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner
NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News
JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC
DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News
SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, "world's biggest media giant"
(Economist, 11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the
world, Blockbuster video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.
MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News of the
World (Jewish mother)
MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS
DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS
JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS
DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning, CBS
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment
BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.
SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman of
Paramount Pictures' Motion Picture Group.
HARVEY WEINSTEIN, CEO. Miramax Films.
BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp.,
owner of Fox TV
MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly
identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his
"mentor."
ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times, the Boston Globe
and other publications.
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post.
Honored by Honest Reporting.com, website monitoring "anti-Israel
media."
RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post
JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe
NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for USA
Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the
Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV
Producers, appointed by Clinton.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an expert on
domestic terrorism.
DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times
network of "alternative weeklies."
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle
East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker
BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal
Entertainment
KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which
represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer
and Bill O'Reilly.
TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.
MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL
WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL-
TimeWarner
JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment
JACK MYERS, NBC, chief.NYT 5.14.2
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks
LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment
JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment
MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America
AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures
JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann's American operations
ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications
BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment
IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live
TED KOPPEL, host of ABC's Nightline
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes
BARBARA WALTERS, Host, ABC's 20-20
MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review
BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week
DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of
CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post
HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle
PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,
RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San
Francisco) Syndicated in 100 markets
MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has
Israeli flag on his home page.
BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.
ANDREW LACK, president of NBC
DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins
DAVID REMNICK, Editor, The New Yorker
NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York
HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker
SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications,
includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group,
includes The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement;
American City Business Journals, business newspapers published in more
than 30 major cities in America; and interests in cable television
programming and cable systems serving 1 million homes.
DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated Press.
PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron's
RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV.
LAWRENCE KIRSHBAUM, CEO, AOL-Time Warner Book Group

[Topaz]

US aid to Israel - Tax Dollars Soaked in Blood
by Susan Abulhawa

With 400 Palestinians killed and over 10,000 wounded (most of them
severely), the Israeli lobby is requesting a new pile of American tax
dollars ($450 million) for 'emergency aid.' Part of this money is
being requested to compensate Israel for withdrawing from a 20 year
occupation of Southern Lebanon.

Excuse me!

Israel invaded Lebanon, used the world banned cluster bombs to kill
20,000 civilians (stories that would make your skin crawl), destroyed
the countries infrastructure and occupied its people for two decades.
Now they want to be compensated for finally obeying international law
and getting out of land where they have no business being? If anyone
ought to be compensated, it's the Lebanese people. At any rate, its
not the responsibility of the American tax payer to pay up.

Israel is an outlaw state in violation of numerous UN Resolution and
various tenets of international laws. Congress should stop behaving as
though we're some kind of Israeli colony bowing to her every whim.
Israel, whose population is 0.1% of the total world population gets
roughly one-third of all US foreign aid. In addition to the
$5,000,000,000 in aid, Israel enjoys the benefits of a whole lot more
US tax payer money. For example, there are special "gifts" like the
Arrow Missile and Levi Fighter, totaling $1.3 billion. Tax payers must
also pay interest on money borrowed for Israel's grants-- about $500
million per year. Private donations to Israel are tax-deductible and
total about $1 billion annually. This does not include the Israeli
bonds sold in the US for $500 million each year.

Despite US restrictions on using money to build illegal settlements on
Palestinian land, Israel has spent hundreds of millions of our dollars
importing Jews from across the world, confiscating Palestinian land
and demolishing their homes to make way for brand new settlements for
the new arrivals.

That's not all. The US also pays Egypt $2.1 billion/year for signing a
peace treaty with Israel and is asked to pay umpteen billions of tax
payer dollars every time Israel notions that is will consider a
pull-back from occupied territories. For example, during peace talks
with Syria, Israel demanded that the US foot a bill of $17 billion for
its withdrawal from the Golan Heights, where it has illegally been
occupying Syrian land and stealing Syrian resources for over 33 years.
Basically, the US taxpayers have to pay Israel in order for Israel to
obey international law and respect the sovereignty of other nations.

At the same time Congress cut the welfare budget by $5.3 billions, aid
to Israel that year was $5.2 billion. Indeed, as filmmaker Tom Hayes
said: "from the mouths of America's poor onto the necks of
Palestinians."

The so called "peace process" is sure to cost us yet more tens of
billions of dollars in payment for Israel's insatiable appetite for
Arab soil and its unrelenting thievery of other's resources. Try
getting an iota of that money for your state. You're lucky if you can
hold onto school lunch programs.

Of course, some of that money trickles back to the US in the form of
campaign funding. These campaign "donations" account for Israel's
power over US foreign policies.

So, what has Israel done for us?

Israel has spied on the US. By the way, a contribution to the 'free
Jonathan Pollard' fund is tax deductible. According to the CIA, Israel
commits industrial espionage against American businesses. They have
exported sensitive US technology to other countries, some of which are
potentially hostile to the U.S., in direct contravention of U.S. law.

In 1967 Israel attacked the USS Liberty killing 34 American crewmen
and wounding 171. Despite thirty three years of unrelenting pleas from
the survivors of that ship, Congress will not afford our servicemen
the
decency of an investigation and has refused to hold a Congressional
hearing for an act of aggression against Americans in a time of peace
despite astounding evidence. Maybe they will when there are no more
survivors to speak and the only testimonies will come from
Israeli-chosen "witnesses."
http://www.halcyon.com/jim/ussliberty/

Israel has a healthy economy and gets piles of money and other aid
from Germany every year. If this US-Israel marriage is indeed in our
best interest then why do they need such a strong well-funded lobby in
our Congress?

Continuing to be the lone veto that keeps the international community
from investigating Israel's breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention
cannot possibly be in our best interest. Patting Israel on the back
while the rest of the world condemns it's flagrant violations of human
rights does not mesh with the principles on which this country was
founded. Retired Navy Admiral, Thomas Moorer, was quoted in a book by
Paul Findley, former congressman from Illinois, as saying "I've never
seen an president- I don't care who he is- stand up to [the Israelis].
It just boggles your mind*.If the American people understood what a
grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in
arms."

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1pco8b1ikjhqaa4eh...@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:10:28 -0600, PaxPerPoten <P...@USA.org> wrote:
>
>>On 1/4/2016 3:38 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>>
>>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>>
>>It doesn't male any difference whom you associate with. The Islamic
>>scumbags will still murder folks that are not Islamic scumbags.
>
> By abd allah
>
> Under the Islamic law, non-Muslim minorities received rights and
> privileges that other minorities did not have under any other law in
> any other country.

There you go again, Alex, making a fool of your inferior, Gentile self.
After all, you have ranted and raved for years about how those wily,
vastly superior Jews control any and everyone, everywhere.

By your own assertions, therefore, nothing Muslims do or say or think
matters - after all, they're inferior too, according to your hate-filled
reality tunnel. Given your asserted inferiority of Gentiles, and the fact
that Muslims are ALSO Gentiles, and therefore stupid and inferior, then
you must also assert that Muslims only believe what Jews tell them to
believe.

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:5rco8bpibrh4cvdaq...@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:49:02 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty <"Liberalism has
> been exposed as a never ending stream of
> contradictions"@nexus.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>They kill other Middle Eastern people for being Christians....
>
> Christmas in Iran
> Mehr News Agency (Iran)
> http://www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1781758
> The Iranian Christian minority in Isfahan and Tehran celebrated the
> New Year's Day on Thursday, Jan. 1, 2013, during a religious ceremony
> in churches. Islam has called Muslims to respect the rights of
> religious minorities in countries with a Muslim majority, and in Iran,
> Muslims have had peaceful relations with Christians and Jews.
> Religious minorities enjoy full freedom in practice of their religious
> ceremonies ...

Taqqiya

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:muco8bhs8lsvcqad2...@4ax.com:

> The War on Whites - being waged by Jewish Supremacists and their
> controlled Black & Brown agents, is indeed very real and getting

You are amazing, Alex. Not only have you claimed that Jews are vastly
superior to Gentiles, who are, by direct inference, incapable of managing
their own affairs, but now you begin to define - and directly insult -
"Black and Brown" Gentiles by claiming they're too stupid to control
themselves.

Forgive me, here, Alex, but if these Jews are so vastly superior to you,
why do you continue to praise them by pointing out how terrific and how
powerful they are?

I used to think you only hated Jews, but it has become increasingly clear
that you hate everyone else, too, including yourself.

Pathetic.

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:m0do8btchk4t31clr...@4ax.com:

> There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
> Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
> Hollywood.

You always insist that Jews are superior, all powerful, controlling the
media, Western nations, all the money, etc.

You always insist everyone ELSE, ie Gentiles, is too stupid (by virtue of
being vastly inferior to your magnificent Jews) to manage their own
affairs.

That being the case, why do you focus on one specific area of Jewish
control, when, by your own endless admissions, Jews control EVERYTHING -
including you?

[Joe Cooper]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:c1do8b5upub5jnv03...@4ax.com:

> US aid to Israel - Tax Dollars Soaked in Blood
> by Susan Abulhawa

So what, Alex? After all, Jews, according to you, are the most powerful,
intelligent and superior beings on the planet. They contol the press,
Hollywood, the financial institutions of the world, Blacks, Browns,
Greens, Yellows and Reds.

So if these vastly superior Jews, more intelligent than any inferior
Gentile can imagine, what aid from the US - which, you claim, they
already control fully - who cares?

Certainly not the Americans, who are controlled by your vastly superior
Jews.

Certainly not the Palestinians, who are controlled by your vastly
superior Jews.

Nor the French, the Germans, the British, the Belgians, the Somalis...you
get the idea... nobody cares... except you, Alex.

And since you admit you are both stupid and inferior to Jews, they it can
only be the Jews who have manipulated YOU into believing the crap you
believe.

Duh.

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/5/2016 1:39 PM, raykeller wrote:

> "Frank" <"frank "@frank.net> wrote in message
>>

>> I heard one peaceful Muslim say that their religion is in need of a
>> reformation and those that did not support it were part of the problem
>
> Lying to infidels is part of thier religion - It's called Taqia
>

need of a reformation = must get more powerful
those that did not support it = infidels
part of the problem = need to be converted or killed

--
.
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
. www.lds.org
.
.

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/5/2016 1:50 PM, Frank wrote:
> No question that Islam is a fundamentally flawed religion. It is only
> peaceful for its followers and the Sunni Shia schism started shortly
> after Mo died. If the religion can't evolve it should be eliminated.

Evolve, how? And who decides?
Eliminated, by whom? There are a LOT of them, you know.

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/5/2016 4:19 PM, Topaz wrote:
> Under the Islamic law, non-Muslim minorities received rights and
> privileges that other minorities did not have under any other law in
> any other country.

>
>

> The Islamic law has ensured several rights and privileges for non-
> Muslim minorities. Perhaps the most important of which is the freedom
> of belief, which is stated in Allah's saying: {There is no coercion
> in religion}[Al-Baqarah: 256].

Ah, so we can expect to see Christian churches
spring up all over Saudi Arabia, any time soon?

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/5/2016 4:20 PM, Topaz wrote:
>
> Christmas in Iran
> Mehr News Agency (Iran)
> http://www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1781758
> The Iranian Christian minority in Isfahan and Tehran celebrated the
> New Year's Day on Thursday, Jan. 1, 2013, during a religious ceremony
> in churches. Islam has called Muslims to respect the rights of
> religious minorities in countries with a Muslim majority, and in Iran,
> Muslims have had peaceful relations with Christians and Jews.
> Religious minorities enjoy full freedom in practice of their religious
> ceremonies ...
>
> www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
>
> http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
>

I remember reading of Bridgitte Gabriel, who is a
Lebanese Christian. Her experiences do not agree
with this writing.

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/5/2016 3:38 PM, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:c1do8b5upub5jnv03...@4ax.com:
>
>> US aid to Israel - Tax Dollars Soaked in Blood
>> by Susan Abulhawa

Cooper, Why don't you shut the fuck up. Topaz is propagandizing.
But the Zionist-Jews are not our friends. And obviously you are another
sellout Obama ass kissing thug.. Move on! And stop giving Topaz grist
for his mill. America for real Americans!

--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/5/2016 4:48 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
> On 1/5/2016 1:50 PM, Frank wrote:
>> No question that Islam is a fundamentally flawed religion. It is only
>> peaceful for its followers and the Sunni Shia schism started shortly
>> after Mo died. If the religion can't evolve it should be eliminated.
>
> Evolve, how? And who decides?
> Eliminated, by whom? There are a LOT of them, you know.

A journey of a thousand miles must start with the first step. ;-)

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/5/2016 7:01 PM, PaxPerPoten wrote:
> On 1/5/2016 4:48 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
>> On 1/5/2016 1:50 PM, Frank wrote:
>>> No question that Islam is a fundamentally flawed religion. It is only
>>> peaceful for its followers and the Sunni Shia schism started shortly
>>> after Mo died. If the religion can't evolve it should be eliminated.
>>
>> Evolve, how? And who decides?
>> Eliminated, by whom? There are a LOT of them, you know.
>
> A journey of a thousand miles must start with the first step. ;-)
>
>

It is better to light a single candle than go to
confessional with a pedophile priest.

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/5/2016 7:49 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
> On 1/5/2016 7:01 PM, PaxPerPoten wrote:
>> On 1/5/2016 4:48 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
>>> On 1/5/2016 1:50 PM, Frank wrote:
>>>> No question that Islam is a fundamentally flawed religion. It is only
>>>> peaceful for its followers and the Sunni Shia schism started shortly
>>>> after Mo died. If the religion can't evolve it should be eliminated.
>>>
>>> Evolve, how? And who decides?
>>> Eliminated, by whom? There are a LOT of them, you know.
>>
>> A journey of a thousand miles must start with the first step. ;-)
>>
>>
>
>
> It is better to light a single candle than go to
> confessional with a pedophile priest.

Are you speaking from experience?

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/5/2016 9:40 PM, coo...@loon.com wrote:

>
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:33:22 -0600, PaxPerPoten <P...@USA.org> wrote:
>
>>> It is better to light a single candle than go to
>>> confessional with a pedophile priest.
>>
>> Are you speaking from experience?
>

> Probably, he's not--unless your momma got knocked up by one?

Do you think that your sucking Obama's dick will finally fill your empty
skull?

[vujQr░ Ｍｉｇｈｔｙ ░ Ｗａｎｎａｂｅ ░hubeX]

raykeller wrote on 05/01/2016 13:39:
> "Frank" <"frank "@frank.net> wrote in message

> news:n6h1m3$jmr$1...@dont-email.me...

>> On 1/4/2016 10:10 PM, PaxPerPoten wrote:

>>> On 1/4/2016 3:38 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If America was not ruled by Jews it would have no problem with Islam.
>>>
>>> It doesn't male any difference whom you associate with. The Islamic
>>> scumbags will still murder folks that are not Islamic scumbags.
>>>

>> Sunni and Shia Muslims murder each other too.
>>

>> I heard one peaceful Muslim say that their religion is in need of a
>> reformation and those that did not support it were part of the problem
>
> Lying to infidels is part of thier religion - It's called Taqia

Kill the infidels is part of the Judeo-Christian religion - It's in the
Old Testament.

Stone the pagans to death:
<https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+17%3A2-5&version=NIV>

Kill the apostates (even if family members):
<https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+13%3A6-11&version=NIV>

Kill the whole town, if a few of them are apostates:
<https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+13%3A13-18&version=NIV>

Kill infidels:
<https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Chronicles+15%3A12-13&version=NIV>

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/5/2016 10:33 PM, PaxPerPoten wrote:
> On 1/5/2016 7:49 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
>>>
>>> A journey of a thousand miles must start with the first step. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> It is better to light a single candle than go to
>> confessional with a pedophile priest.
>
> Are you speaking from experience?
>

<squeak> No, Father! <squeak>

[Topaz]

Maybe a Jew wrote the book?

There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.

[Topaz]

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:50:56 -0500, Stormin Mormon
<cayo...@hotmail.com> wrote:


>
>Ah, so we can expect to see Christian churches
>spring up all over Saudi Arabia, any time soon?

Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.

Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.

Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim ruled country.

[Topaz]

Unholy Alliance - Zionism and Christianity: Ted Pike, interviewed by
Texe Marrs, provides eye-opening insight into the great harm being
done by supposed Christian leaders who have bought into the
unscriptural Zionist scheme. Many of them, he reports, are richly
rewarded for their allegiance to earthly Israel. For example, Baptist
pastor Jerry Falwell was given a spanking new, multimillion dollar
executive jet by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. Pat
Robertson's CBN Network was "blessed" by Israel with a television
station in Lebanon. But - surprise! - in fact, U.S. taxpayers
actually footed the bill for these toys which Israel so generously
showered on its Judaizer pals of the powerful U.S. evangelical lobby.

www.powerofprophecy.com

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:41:49 -0700, coo...@loon.com wrote:

>>Maybe a Jew wrote the book?
>

>What about----that Hitler was a one-nutted, can't get it up austrian?

What about- you were following his instructions to the letter?

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:22:35 -0700, coo...@loon.com wrote:

>You still trying to come up with some clever rejoinder,
>Shitter-in-yer-pantzen?

And you think fantasizing about Hitler's balls passes for "clever",
Gary?

I suppose on the grammar school playground where you hang out it
might.

[Topaz]

Germany's Declaration of War Against the United States
Here are some quotes from:
Hitler's Reichstag Speech of December 11, 1941
In it the German leader recounted the reasons for the outbreak of war
in September 1939, explained why he decided to strike against the
Soviet Union in June 1941, reviewed the dramatic course of the war
thus far, and dealt at length with President Franklin Roosevelt's
hostile policies toward Germany. Hitler detailed the increasingly
belligerent actions of Roosevelt's government, and then dramatically
announced that Germany was now joining Japan in war against the United
States. The day after it was delivered, an inaccurate and misleading
translation of portions of the address appeared in The New York Times!
Although this historic address should be of particular interest to
Americans, a complete text has apparently never before been made
available in English!
-- Mark Weber

After the repeated rejection of my peace proposal in 1940 by the
British prime minister [Winston Churchill] and the clique that
supports and controls him, it was clear by the fall of that year that
this war would have to be fought through to the end
The German people and its soldiers work and fight today not only for
themselves and their own age, but also for many generations to come. A
historical task of unique dimensions has been entrusted to us by the
Creator that we are now obliged to carry out.

The western armistice which was possible shortly after the conclusion
of the conflict in Norway [in June 1940] compelled the German
leadership, first of all, to militarily secure the most important
political, strategic and economic areas that had been won.
From Kirkenes [in northern Norway] to the Spanish frontier stretches
the most extensive belt of great defense installations and fortresses.
Countless air fields have been built, including some in the far north
that were blasted out of granite.

I am determined to make this European front impregnable against any
enemy attack.

Compelled by bitter necessity, I decided in the fall of 1939 to at
least try to create the prerequisite conditions for a general peace by
eliminating the acute tension between Germany and Soviet Russia [with
the German-Soviet non-aggression pact of August 23, 1939]. This was
psychologically difficult because of the basic attitude toward
Bolshevism of the German people and, above all, of the [National
Socialist] Party.

I may remind you, deputies and men of the German Reichstag, that
throughout the spring and summer of 1939 Britain offered military
alliances to a number of countries, claiming that Germany intended to
invade them and rob them of their freedom. However, the German Reich
and its government could assure them with a clear conscience that
these insinuations did not correspond to the truth in any way.

The best and strongest guarantee against the [Soviet] threat from the
East was Germany. When those countries, on their own initiative, cut
their ties with the German Reich and instead put their trust in
promises of aid from a power [Britain] that, in its proverbial
egotism, has for centuries never given help but has always demanded
it, they were thereby lost. Even so, the fate of these countries
aroused the strongest sympathy of the German people. The winter war of
the Finns [against the Soviet Union, 1939-1940] aroused in us a
feeling of admiration mixed with bitterness: admiration because, as a
soldierly nation, we have a sympathetic heart for heroism and
sacrifice, and bitterness because our concern for the enemy threat in
the West and the danger in the East meant that we were no position to
help.

Already in 1940 it became increasingly clear from month to month that
the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed at the domination, and
thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already told the nation
of the build-up of Soviet Russian military power in the East during a
period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces
bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a
military build-up of unique world-historical dimensions was being
carried out. And this was not in order to protect something that was
being threatened, but rather only to attack that which seemed
incapable of defense.

What we call Europe is the geographic territory of the Occident,
enlightened by Greek culture, inspired by the powerful heritage of the
Roman empire, its territory enlarged by Germanic colonization. Whether
it was the German emperors fighting back invasions from the East on
the Unstrut [river, in 933] or on the Lechfeld [plain, in 955], or
others pushing back Africa from Spain over a period of many years, it
was always a struggle of a developing Europe against a profoundly
alien outside world.

Just as Rome once made her immortal contribution to the building and
defense of the continent, so now have the Germanic peoples taken up
the defense and protection of a family of nations which, although they
may differ and diverge in their political structure and goals,
nevertheless together constitute a racially and culturally unified and
complementary whole.

And from this Europe there have not only been settlements in other
parts of the world, but intellectual-spiritual [geistig] and cultural
fertilization as well, a fact that anyone realizes who is willing to
acknowledge the truth rather than deny it. Thus, it was not England
that cultivated the continent, but rather Anglo-Saxon and Norman
branches of the Germanic nation that moved from our continent to the
[British] island and made possible her development, which is certainly
unique in history. In the same way, it was not America that discovered
Europe, but the other way around. And all that which America did not
get from Europe may seem worthy of admiration to a Jewified mixed
race, but Europe regards that merely as symptomatic of decay in
artistic and cultural life, the product of Jewish or Negroid blood
mixture.

I have to make these remarks because this struggle, which became
obviously unavoidable in the early months of this year, and which the
German Reich, above all, is called upon this time to lead, also
greatly transcends the interests of our own people and nation. When
the Greeks once stood against the Persians, they defended more than
just Greece. When the Romans stood against the Carthaginians, they
defended more than just Rome. When the Roman and Germanic peoples
stood together against the Huns, they defended more than just the
West. When German emperors stood against the Mongols, they defended
more than just Germany. And when Spanish heroes stood against Africa,
they defended not just Spain, but all of Europe as well. In the same
way, Germany does not fight today just for itself, but for our entire
continent.

And it is an auspicious sign that this realization is today so deeply
rooted in the subconscious of most European nations that they
participate in this struggle, either with open expressions of support
or with streams of volunteers.

When I became aware of the possibility of a threat to the east of the
Reich in 1940 through [secret] reports from the British House of
Commons and by observations of Soviet Russian troop movements on our
frontiers, I immediately ordered the formation of many new armored,
motorized and infantry divisions.

We realized very clearly that under no circumstances could we allow
the enemy the opportunity to strike first into our heart.
Nevertheless, in this case the decision [to attack Soviet Russia] was
a very difficult one. When the writers for the democratic newspapers
now declare that I would have thought twice before attacking if I had
known the strength of the Bolshevik adversaries, they show that they
do not understand either the situation or me.

I have not sought war. To the contrary, I have done everything to
avoid conflict. But I would forget my duty and my conscience if I were
to do nothing in spite of the realization that a conflict had become
unavoidable. Because I regarded Soviet Russia as the gravest danger
not only for the German Reich but for all of Europe, I decided, if
possible, to give the order myself to attack a few days before the
outbreak of this conflict.

A truly impressive amount of authentic material is now available which
confirms that a Soviet Russian attack was intended. We are also sure
about when this attack was to take place. In view of this danger, the
extent of which we are perhaps only now truly aware, I can only thank
the Lord God that He enlightened me in time, and has given me the
strength to do what must be done. Millions of German soldiers may
thank Him for their lives, and all of Europe for its existence.

I may say this today: If this wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds
of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more
than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion
against the Reich, Europe would have been lost.

If the Slovaks, Hungarians and Romanians had not also acted to defend
this European world, then the Bolshevik hordes would have poured over
the Danube countries as did once the swarms of Attila's Huns,
If Italy, Spain and Croatia had not sent their divisions, then a
European defense front would not have arisen that proclaims the
concept of a new Europe and thereby powerfully inspires all other
nations as well. Because of this awareness of danger, volunteers have
come from northern and western Europe: Norwegians, Danes, Dutch,
Flemish, Belgians and even French. They have all given the struggle of
the allied forces of the Axis the character of a European crusade, in
the truest sense of the word.

And now let me speak about another world, one that is represented by a
man [President Franklin Roosevelt] who likes to chat nicely at the
fireside while nations and their soldiers fight in snow and ice: above
all, the man who is primarily responsible for this war.

When the nationality problem in the former Polish state was growing
ever more intolerable in 1939, I attempted to eliminate the
unendurable conditions by means of a just agreement. For a certain
time it seemed as if the Polish government was seriously considering
giving its approval to a reasonable solution. I may also add here that
in all of these German proposals, nothing was demanded that had not
previously belonged to Germany. In fact, we were willing to give up
much that had belonged to Germany before the [First] World War.
You will recall the dramatic events of that period -- the steadily
increasing numbers of victims among the ethnic Germans [in Poland].
You, my deputies, are best qualified to compare this loss of life with
that of the present war. The military campaign in the East has so far
cost the entire German armed forces about 160,000 deaths, whereas
during just a few months of peace [in 1939] more than 62,000 ethnic
Germans were killed, including some who were horribly tortured. There
is no question that the German Reich had the right to protest against
this situation on its border and to press for its elimination, if for
no other reason than for its own security, particularly since we live
in an age in which [some] other countries [notably, the USA and
Britain] regard their security at stake even in foreign continents. In
geographical terms, the problems to be resolved were not very
important. Essentially they involved Danzig [Gdansk] and a connecting
link between the torn-away province of East Prussia and the rest of
the Reich. Of much greater concern were the brutal persecutions of the
Germans in Poland. In addition, the other minority population groups
[notably the Ukrainians] were subject to a fate that was no less
severe.

During those days in August [1939], when the Polish attitude steadily
hardened, thanks to Britain's blank check of unlimited backing, the
German Reich was moved to make one final proposal. We were prepared to
enter into negotiations with Poland on the basis of this proposal, and
we verbally informed the British ambassador of the proposal text.
Proposal for a settlement of the Danzig-Corridor problem and the
German-Polish minority question:

The situation between the German Reich and Poland is now such that any
further incident could lead to action by the military forces that have
taken position on both sides of the frontier. Any peaceful solution
must be such that the basic causes of this situation are eliminated so
that they are not simply repeated, which would mean that not only
eastern Europe but other areas as well would be subject to the same
tension. The causes of this situation are rooted in, first, the
intolerable border that was specified by the dictated peace of
Versailles [of 1919], and, second, the intolerable treatment of the
minority populations in the lost territories.

In making these proposals, the German Reich government is motivated by
the desire to achieve a permanent solution that will put an end to the
intolerable situation arising from the present border demarcation,
secure to both parties vitally important connecting routes, and which
will solve the minority problem, insofar as that is possible, and if
not, will at least insure a tolerable life for the minority
populations with secure guarantees of their rights.

On the basis of these considerations, we make the following concrete
proposals:

The Free City of Danzig returns immediately to the German Reich on
the basis of its purely German character and the unanimous desire of
its population.

The territory of the so-called [Polish] Corridor will decide for
itself whether it wishes to belong to Germany or to Poland. This
territory consists of the area between the Baltic Sea [in the north]
to a line marked [in the south] by the towns of Marienwerder,
Graudenz, Kuhn and Bromberg -- including these towns -- and then
westwards to Schoenlanke.

For this purpose a plebiscite will be conducted in this territory.
All Germans who lived in this territory on January 1, 1918, or were
born there on or before that date will be entitled to vote in the
plebiscite. Similarly, all Poles, Kashubians, and so forth, who lived
in this territory on or before that date, or were born there before
that date, will also be entitled to vote. Germans who were expelled
from this territory will return to vote in the plebiscite.

Not included in this territory is the Polish port of Gdynia, which is
regarded as fundamentally sovereign Polish territory, to the extent of
[ethnic] Polish settlement, but as a matter of principle is recognized
as Polish territory. The specific border of this Polish port city will
be negotiated by Germany and Poland and, if necessary, established by
an international court of arbitration.

A simple majority of the votes cast will decide whether the territory
will go to Germany or to Poland.

If the Corridor returns to Germany, the German Reich declares that it
is ready to carry out an exchange of population with Poland to the
extent that this would be suitable for the [people of the] Corridor.

The German Reich government has protested in the strongest terms
against the Polish treatment of its minority populations. For its
part, the Polish government also believes itself called upon to make
protests against Germany. Accordingly, both sides agree to submit
these complaints to an international investigation commission, which
will be responsible for investigating all complaints of economic and
physical damage as well as other acts of terror.

This is the treaty proposal - as straight-forward and as generous as
has ever been presented by a government - that was made by the
National Socialist leadership of the German Reich.

The former Polish government refused to respond to these proposals in
any way. In this regard, the question presents itself: How is it
possible that such an unimportant state could dare to simply disregard
such proposals and, in addition, carry out further cruelties against
the Germans, the people who have given this land its entire culture,
and even order the general mobilization of its armed forces? A look at
the documents of the [Polish] Foreign Ministry in Warsaw later
provided the surprising explanation. They told of the role of a man
[President Roosevelt] who, with diabolical lack of principle, used all
of his influence to strengthen Poland's resistance and to prevent any
possibility of understanding. These reports were sent by the former
Polish ambassador in Washington, Count [Jerzy] Potocki, to his
government in Warsaw. These documents clearly and shockingly reveal
the extent to which one man and the powers behind him are responsible
for the Second World War. Another question arises: Why had this man
[Roosevelt] developed such a fanatic hostility against a country that,
in its entire history, had never harmed either America or him?
With regard to Germany's relationship with America, the following
should be said:

Germany is perhaps the only great power which has never had a colony
in either North or South America. Nor has it been otherwise
politically active there, apart from the emigration of many millions
of Germans with their skills, from which the American continent, and
particularly the United States, has only benefited.

Furthermore, there are no territorial or political conflicts between
the American and German nations that could possibly involve the
existence or even the [vital] interests of the United States. The
forms of government have always been different. But this cannot be a
reason for hostility between different nations, as long as one form of
government does not try to interfere with another, outside of its
naturally ordained sphere.

History itself has rendered its verdict on Wilson. His name will
always be associated with the most base betrayal in history of a
pledge [notably, Wilson's "14 points"]. The result was the ruin of
national life, not only in the so-called vanquished countries, but
among the victors as well. Because of this broken pledge, which alone
made possible the imposed Treaty of Versailles [1919], countries were
torn apart, cultures were destroyed and the economic life of all was
ruined. Today we know that a group of self-serving financiers stood
behind Wilson. They used this paralytic professor to lead America into
a war from which they hoped to profit. The German nation once believed
this man, and had to pay for this trust with political and economic
ruin.

After such a bitter experience, why is there now another American
president who is determined to incite wars and, above all, to stir up
hostility against Germany to the point of war? National Socialism came
to power in Germany in the same year [1933] that Roosevelt came to
power in the United States. At this point it is important to examine
the factors behind the current developments.

First of all, the personal side of things: I understand very well that
there is a world of difference between my own outlook on life and
attitude, and that of President Roosevelt. Roosevelt came from an
extremely wealthy family. By birth and origin he belonged to that
class of people that is privileged in a democracy and assured of
advancement. I myself was only the child of a small and poor family,
and I had to struggle through life by work and effort in spite of
immense hardships. As a member of the privileged class, Roosevelt
experienced the [First] World War in a position under Wilson's shadow
[as assistant secretary of the Navy]. As a result, he only knew the
agreeable consequences of a conflict between nations from which some
profited while others lost their lives. During this same period, I
lived very differently. I was not one of those who made history or
profits, but rather one of those who carried out orders. As an
ordinary soldier during those four years, I tried to do my duty in the
face of the enemy. Of course, I returned from the war just as poor as
when I entered in the fall of 1914. I thus shared my fate with
millions of others, while Mr. Roosevelt shared his with the so-called
upper ten thousand.

After the war, while Mr. Roosevelt tested his skills in financial
speculation in order to profit personally from the inflation, that is,
from the misfortune of others, I still lay in a military hospital
along with many hundreds of thousands of others. Experienced in
business, financially secure and enjoying the patronage of his class,
Roosevelt then finally chose a career in politics. During this same
period, I struggled as a nameless and unknown man for the rebirth of
my nation, which was the victim of the greatest injustice in its
entire history.

Two different paths in life! Franklin Roosevelt took power in the
United States as the candidate of a thoroughly capitalistic party,
which helps those who serve it. When I became the Chancellor of the
German Reich, I was the leader of a popular national movement, which I
had created myself. The powers that supported Mr. Roosevelt were the
same powers I fought against, out of concern for the fate of my
people, and out of deepest inner conviction. The "brain trust" that
served the new American president was made up of members of the same
national group that we fought against in Germany as a parasitical
expression of humanity, and which we began to remove from public life.
And yet, we also had something in common: Franklin Roosevelt took
control of a country with an economy that had been ruined as a result
of democratic influences, and I assumed the leadership of a Reich that
was also on the edge of complete ruin, thanks to democracy. There were
13 million unemployed in the United States, while Germany had seven
million unemployed and another seven million part-time workers. In
both countries, public finances were in chaos, and it seemed that the
spreading economic depression could not be stopped.

From then on, things developed in the United States and in the German
Reich in such a way that future generations will have no difficulty in
making a definitive evaluation of the two different socio-political
theories. Whereas the German Reich experienced an enormous improvement
in social, economic, cultural and artistic life in just a few years
under National Socialist leadership, President Roosevelt was not able
to bring about even limited improvements in his own country. This task
should have been much easier in the United States, with barely 15
people per square kilometer, as compared to 140 in Germany. If
economic prosperity is not possible in that country, it must be the
result of either a lack of will by the ruling leadership or the
complete incompetence of the men in charge. In just five years, the
economic problems were solved in Germany and unemployment was
eliminated. During this same period, President Roosevelt enormously
increased his country's national debt, devalued the dollar, further
disrupted the economy and maintained the same number of unemployed.
But this is hardly remarkable when one realizes that the intellects
appointed by this man, or more accurately, who appointed him, are
members of that same group who, as Jews, are interested only in
disruption and never in order. While we in National Socialist Germany
took measures against financial speculation, it flourished
tremendously under Roosevelt. The New Deal legislation of this man was
spurious, and consequently the greatest error ever experienced by
anyone. If his economic policies had continued indefinitely during
peace time, there is no doubt that sooner or later they would have
brought down this president, in spite of all his dialectical
cleverness. In a European country his career would certainly have
ended in front of a national court for recklessly squandering the
nation's wealth. And he would hardly have avoided a prison sentence by
a civil court for criminally incompetent business management.
Many respected Americans also shared this view. A threatening
opposition was growing all around this man, which led him to think
that he could save himself only by diverting public attention from his
domestic policies to foreign affairs. In this regard it is interesting
to study the reports of Polish Ambassador Potocki from Washington,
which repeatedly point out that Roosevelt was fully aware of the
danger that his entire economic house of cards could collapse, and
that therefore he absolutely had to divert attention to foreign
policy.

The circle of Jews around Roosevelt encouraged him in this. With Old
Testament vindictiveness they regarded the United States as the
instrument that they and he could use to prepare a second Purim
[slaughter of enemies] against the nations of Europe, which were
increasingly anti-Jewish. So it was that the Jews, in all of their
satanic baseness, gathered around this man, and he relied on them.
The American president increasingly used his influence to create
conflicts, intensify existing conflicts, and, above all, to keep
conflicts from being resolved peacefully. For years this man looked
for a dispute anywhere in the world, but preferably in Europe, that he
could use to create political entanglements with American economic
obligations to one of the contending sides, which would then steadily
involve America in the conflict and thus divert attention from his own
confused domestic economic policies.

His actions against the German Reich in this regard have been
particularly blunt. Starting in 1937, he began a series of speeches,
including a particularly contemptible one on October 5, 1937, in
Chicago, with which this man systematically incited the American
public against Germany . He threatened to establish a kind of
quarantine against the so-called authoritarian countries. As part of
this steady and growing campaign of hate and incitement, President
Roosevelt made another insulting statement [on Nov. 15, 1938] and then
called the American ambassador in Berlin back to Washington for
consultations. Since then the two countries have been represented only
by charges d'affaires.

Starting in November 1938, he began systematically and consciously to
sabotage every possibility of a European peace policy. In public he
hypocritically claimed to be interested in peace while at the same
time he threatened every country that was ready to pursue a policy of
peaceful understanding by blocking credits, economic reprisals,
calling in loans, and so forth. In this regard, the reports of the
Polish ambassadors in Washington, London, Paris and Brussels provide a
shocking insight.

This man increased his campaign of incitement in January 1939. In a
message [on Jan. 4, 1939] to the U.S. Congress he threatened to take
every measure short of war against the authoritarian countries.
He repeatedly claimed that other countries were trying to interfere in
American affairs, and he talked a lot about upholding the Monroe
Doctrine. Starting in March 1939 he began lecturing about internal
European affairs that were of no concern of the President of the
United States. In the first place, he doesn't understand these
problems, and secondly, even if he did understand them and appreciated
the historical circumstances, he has no more right to concern himself
with central European affairs than the German head of state has to
take positions on or make judgments about conditions in the United
States.

Mr. Roosevelt went even beyond that. Contrary to the rules of
international law, he refused to recognize governments he didn't like,
would not accept new ones, refused to dismiss ambassadors of
non-existent countries, and even recognized them as legal governments.
He went so far as to conclude treaties with these ambassadors, which
then gave him the right to simply occupy foreign territories
[Greenland and Iceland ].

But now the honorable wife [Eleanor Roosevelt] took his place. She and
her sons [she said] refused to live in a world such as ours. That is
at least understandable, for ours is world of work and not one of
deceit and racketeering. After a short rest, though, he was back at
it. On November 4, 1939, the Neutrality Act was revised and the arms
embargo was repealed in favor of a one-sided supply [of weapons] to
Germany's adversaries. In the same way, he pushed in eastern Asia for
economic entanglements with China that would eventually lead to
effective common interests. That same month he recognized a small
group of Polish emigrants as a so-called government in exile, the only
political basis of which was a few million Polish gold pieces they had
taken from Warsaw.

This man revealed his true attitude in a telegram of June 15 [1940] to
French premier [Paul] Reynaud. Roosevelt told him that the American
government would double its aid to France, on the condition that
France continue the war against Germany. In order to give special
emphasis to his desire that the war continue, he declared that the
American government would not recognize acquisitions brought about by
conquest, which included, for example, the retaking of territories
that had been stolen from Germany. I do not need to emphasize that now
and in the future, the German government will not be concerned about
whether or not the President of the United States recognizes a border
in Europe. I mention this case because it is characteristic of the
systematic incitement of this man, who hypocritically talks about
peace while at the same time he incites to war.

And now he feared that if peace were to come about in Europe, the
billions he had squandered on military spending would soon be
recognized as an obvious case of fraud, because no one would attack
America unless America itself provoked the attack. On June 17, 1940,
the President of the United States froze French assets [in the USA] in
order, so he said, to keep them from being seized by Germany, but in
reality to get hold of the gold that was being brought from Casablanca
on an American cruiser.

In July 1940 Roosevelt began to take many new measures toward war,
such as permitting the service of American citizens in the British air
force and the training of British air force personnel in the United
States. In August 1940 a joint military policy for the United States
and Canada was established. In order to make the establishment of a
joint American-Canadian defense committee plausible to at least the
stupidest people, Roosevelt periodically invented crises and acted as
if America was threatened by immediate attack. He would suddenly
cancel trips and quickly return to Washington and do similar things in
order to emphasize the seriousness of the situation to his followers,
who really deserve pity. He moved still closer to war in September
1940 when he transferred fifty American naval destroyers to the
British fleet, and in return took control of military bases on British
possessions in North and Central America. Future generations will
determine the extent to which, along with all this hatred against
socialist Germany, the desire to easily and safely take control of the
British empire in its hour of disintegration may have also played a
role.

After Britain was no longer able to pay cash for American deliveries
he imposed the Lend-Lease Act on the American people [in March 1941].
As President, he thereby obtained the authority to furnish lend-lease
military aid to countries that he, Roosevelt, decided it was in
America's vital interests to defend. After it became clear that
Germany would not respond under any circumstances to his continued
boorish behavior, this man took another step forward in March 1941.
As early as December 19, 1939, an American cruiser [the Tuscaloosa]
that was inside the security zone maneuvered the [German] passenger
liner Columbus into the hands of British warships. As a result, it had
to be scuttled. On that same day, US military forces helped in an
effort to capture the German merchant ship Arauca. On January 27,
1940, and once again contrary to international law, the US cruiser
Trenton reported the movements of the German merchant ships Arauca, La
Plata and Wangoni to enemy naval forces.

On June 27, 1940, he announced a limitation on the free movement of
foreign merchant ships in US ports, completely contrary to
international law. In November 1940 he permitted US warships to pursue
the German merchant ships Phrygia, Idarwald and Rhein until they
finally had to scuttle themselves to keep from falling into enemy
hands. On April 13, 1941, American ships were permitted to pass freely
through the Red Sea in order to supply British armies in the Middle
East.

In the meantime, in March [1941] all German ships were confiscated by
the American authorities. In the process, German Reich citizens were
treated in the most degrading way, ordered to certain locations in
violation of international law, put under travel restrictions, and so
forth. Two German officers who had escaped from Canadian captivity [to
the United States] were shackled and returned to the Canadian
authorities, likewise completely contrary to international law.

On March 27 [1941] the same president who is [supposedly] against all
aggression announced support for [General Dusan] Simovic and his
clique of usurpers [in Yugoslavia], who had come to power in Belgrade
after the overthrow of the legal government. Several months earlier,
President Roosevelt had sent [OSS chief] Colonel Donovan, a very
inferior character, to the Balkans with orders to help organize an
uprising against Germany and Italy in Sofia [Bulgaria] and Belgrade.
In April he [Roosevelt] promised lend-lease aid to Yugoslavia and
Greece. At the end of April he recognized Yugoslav and Greek emigrants
as governments in exile. And once again, in violation of international
law, he froze Yugoslav and Greek assets. Starting in mid-April [1941]
US naval patrols began expanded operations in the western Atlantic,
reporting their observations to the British. On April 26, Roosevelt
delivered twenty high speed patrol boats to Britain. At the same time,
British naval ships were routinely being repaired in US ports. On May
12, Norwegian ships operating for Britain were armed and repaired [in
the USA], contrary to international law. On June 4, American troop
transports arrived in Greenland to build air fields. And on June 9
came the first British report that a US war ship, acting on orders of
President Roosevelt, had attacked a German submarine near Greenland
with depth charges.

On June 14, German assets in the United States were frozen, again in
violation of international law. On June 17, on the basis of a lying
pretext, President Roosevelt demanded the recall of the German consuls
and the closing of the German consulates. He also demanded the
shutting down of the German "Transocean" press agency, the German
Library of Information [in New York] and the German Reichsbahn
[national railway] office.

On July 6 and 7 [1941], American armed forces acting on orders from
Roosevelt occupied Iceland, which was in the area of German military
operations. He hoped that this action would certainly, first, finally
force Germany into war [against the USA] and, second, also neutralize
the effectiveness of the German submarines, much as in 1915-1916. At
the same time, he promised military aid to the Soviet Union. On July
10 Navy Secretary [Frank] Knox suddenly announced that the US Navy was
under orders to fire against Axis warships. On September 4 the US
destroyer Greer, acting on his orders, operated together with British
airplanes against German submarines in the Atlantic. Five days later,
a German submarine identified US destroyers as escort vessels with a
British convoy.

In a speech delivered on September 11 [1941], Roosevelt at last
personally confirmed that he had given the order to fire against all
Axis ships, and he repeated the order. On September 29, US patrols
attacked a German submarine east of Greenland with depth charges. On
October 17 the US destroyer Kearny, operating as an escort for the
British, attacked a German submarine with depth charges, and on
November 6 US armed forces seized the German ship Odenwald in
violation of international law, took it to an American port, and
imprisoned its crew.

I will overlook as meaningless the insulting attacks and rude
statements by this so-called President against me personally. That he
calls me a gangster is particularly meaningless, since this term did
not originate in Europe, where such characters are uncommon, but in
America. And aside from that, I simply cannot feel insulted by Mr.
Roosevelt because I regard him, like his predecessor Woodrow Wilson,
as mentally unsound [geisteskrank].

We know that this man, with his Jewish supporters, has operated
against Japan in the same way. I don't need to go into that here. The
same methods were used in that case as well. This man first incites to
war, and then he lies about its causes and makes baseless allegations.
He repugnantly wraps himself in a cloak of Christian hypocrisy, while
at the same time slowly but very steadily leading humanity into war.
And finally, as an old Freemason, he calls upon God to witness that
his actions are honorable. His shameless misrepresentations of truth
and violations of law are unparalleled in history.

I am sure that all of you have regarded it as an act of deliverance
that a country [Japan] has finally acted to protest against all this
in the very way that this man had actually hoped for, and which should
not surprise him now [the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941].
After years of negotiating with this deceiver, the Japanese government
finally had its fill of being treated in such a humiliating way. All
of us, the German people and, I believe, all other decent people
around the world as well, regard this with deep appreciation.

We know the power behind Roosevelt. It is the same eternal Jew that
believes that his hour has come to impose the same fate on us that we
have all seen and experienced with horror in Soviet Russia. We have
gotten to know first hand the Jewish paradise on earth. Millions of
German soldiers have personally seen the land where this international
Jewry has destroyed and annihilated people and property. Perhaps the
President of the United States does not understand this. If so, that
only speaks for his intellectual narrow-mindedness.

And we know that his entire effort is aimed at this goal: Even if we
were not allied with Japan, we would still realize that the Jews and
their Franklin Roosevelt intend to destroy one state after another.
The German Reich of today has nothing in common with the Germany of
the past. For our part, we will now do what this provocateur has been
trying to achieve for years. And not just because we are allied with
Japan, but rather because Germany and Italy with their present
leaderships have the insight and strength to realize that in this
historic period the existence or non-existence of nations is being
determined, perhaps for all time. What this other world has in store
for us is clear. They were able to bring the democratic Germany of the
past [1918-1933] to starvation, and they seek to destroy the National
Socialist Germany of today.

When Mr. Churchill and Mr. Roosevelt declare that they want to one day
build a new social order, that's about the same as a bald-headed
barber recommending a tonic guaranteed to make hair grow. Rather than
incite war, these gentlemen, who live in the most socially backward
countries, should have concerned themselves with their own unemployed
people. They have enough misery and poverty in their own countries to
keep themselves busy insuring a just distribution of food there. As
far as the German nation is concerned, it doesn't need charity, either
from Mr. Churchill, Mr. Roosevelt or [British foreign secretary] Mr.
Eden -- but it does demand its rights. And it will do what it must to
insure its right to life, even if a thousand Churchills and Roosevelts
conspire together to prevent it.

Our nation has a history of nearly two thousand years. Never in this
long period has it been so united and determined as it is today, and
thanks to the National Socialist movement it will always be that way.
At the same time, Germany has perhaps never been as far-sighted, and
seldom as conscious of honor. Accordingly, today I had the passports
returned to the American charge d'affaires, and he was bluntly
informed of the following:

President Roosevelt's steadily expanding policy has been aimed at an
unlimited world dictatorship. In pursuing this goal, the United States
and Britain have used every means to deny the German, Italian and
Japanese nations the prerequisites for their vital natural existence.
For this reason, the governments of Britain and the United States of
America have opposed every effort to create a new and better order in
the world, for both the present and the future. Since the beginning of
the war [in September 1939], the American President Roosevelt has
steadily committed ever more serious crimes against international law.
Along with illegal attacks against ships and other property of German
and Italian citizens, there have been threats and even arbitrary
deprivations of personal freedom by internment and such. The
increasingly hostile attacks by the American President Roosevelt have
reached the point that he has ordered the U.S. navy, in complete
violation of international law, to immediately and everywhere attack,
fire upon and sink German and Italian ships. American officials have
even boasted about destroying German submarines in this criminal
manner. American cruisers have attacked and captured German and
Italian merchant ships, and their peaceful crews were taken away to
imprisonment In addition, President Roosevelt's plan to attack Germany
and Italy with military forces in Europe by 1943 at the latest was
made public in the United States [by the Chicago Tribune and several
other newspapers on Dec. 4, 1941], and the American government made no
effort to deny it.

Despite the years of intolerable provocations by President Roosevelt,
Germany and Italy sincerely and very patiently tried to prevent the
expansion of this war and to maintain relations with the United
States. But as a result of his campaign, these efforts have failed.
Faithful to the provisions of the Tripartite Pact of September 27,
1940, German and Italy accordingly now regard themselves as finally
forced to join together on the side of Japan in the struggle for the
defense and preservation of the freedom and independence of our
nations and realms against the United States of America and Britain.
The three powers have accordingly concluded the following agreement,
which was signed today in Berlin:

Article 1. Germany, Italy and Japan will together conduct the war that
has been forced upon them by the United States of America and Britain
with all the means at their command to a victorious conclusion.

Article 2. Germany, Italy and Japan pledge not to conclude an
armistice or make peace with either the United States of America or
Britain unless by complete mutual agreement.

Article 3. Germany, Italy and Japan will also work very closely
together after a victorious conclusion of the war for the purpose of
bringing about a just new order in accord with the Tripartite Pact
concluded by them on September 27, 1940.

Ever since my peace proposal of July 1940 was rejected, we have
clearly realized that this struggle must be fought through to the end.
We National Socialists are not at all surprised that the
Anglo-American, Jewish and capitalist world is united together with
Bolshevism. In our country we have always found them in the same
community. Alone we successfully fought against them here in Germany,
and after 14 years of struggle for power we were finally able to
annihilate our enemies.

When I decided 23 years ago to enter political life in order to lead
the nation up from ruin, I was a nameless, unknown soldier. Many of
you here know just how difficult those first years of that struggle
really were. The way from a small movement of seven men to the taking
of power on January 30, 1933, as the responsible government is so
miraculous that only the blessing of Providence could have made it
possible.

Our adversaries today are the same familiar enemies of more than
twenty years.

When we think of the sacrifice and effort of our soldiers, then every
sacrifice of [those here in] the homeland is completely insignificant
and unimportant. And when we consider the number of all those in past
generations who gave their lives for the survival and greatness of the
German nation, then we are really conscious of the magnitude of the
duty that is ours.

The government of the United States of America, having violated in the
most flagrant manner and in ever increasing measure all rules of
neutrality in favor of the adversaries of Germany, and having
continually been guilty of the most severe provocations toward Germany
ever since the outbreak of the European war, brought on by the British
declaration of war against Germany on September 3, 1939, has finally
resorted to open military acts of aggression.

On September 11, 1941, the President of the United States of America
publicly declared that he had ordered the American Navy and Air Force
to shoot on sight any German war vessel. In his speech of October 27,
1941, he once more expressly affirmed that this order was in force.
Acting under this order, American naval vessels have systematically
attacked German naval forces since early September 1941. Thus,
American destroyers, as for instance, the Greer, the Kearny and the
Reuben James, have opened fire on German submarines according to plan.
The American Secretary of the Navy, Mr. Knox, himself confirmed that
the American destroyers attacked German submarines.

Furthermore, the naval forces of the United States of America, under
order of their government and contrary to international law, have
treated and seized German merchant ships on the high seas as enemy
ships.

The German government therefore establishes the following facts:
Although Germany on her part has strictly adhered to the rules of
international law in her relations with the United States of America
during every period of the present war, the government of the United
States of America from initial violations of neutrality has finally
proceeded to open acts of war against Germany. It has thereby
virtually created a state of war.

The government of the Reich consequently breaks off diplomatic
relations with the United States of America and declares that under
these circumstances brought about by President Roosevelt, Germany too,
as from today, considers herself as being in a state of war with the
United States of America.

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/7/2016 5:22 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>
>>>> What about----that Hitler was a one-nutted, can't get it up austrian?
>>>
>>> What about- you were following his instructions to the letter?
>>
>> You still trying to come up with some clever rejoinder,
>> Shitter-in-yer-pantzen?
>
> And you think fantasizing about Hitler's balls passes for "clever",
> Gary?

It is jealousy! Hitler had one and Gary has none. All Gary has is an
Itchy Camel-toe!

[Topaz]

"For us there are only two possibilities: either we remain German or
we come under the thumb of the Jews. This latter must not occur; even
if we are small, we are a force. A well-organized group can conquer a
strong enemy. If you stick close together and keep bringing in new
people, we will be victorious over the Jews."

Adolf Hitler
SPEECH OF NOVEMBER 9, 1921

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/8/2016 5:39 PM, Topaz wrote:
>
>
> "For us there are only two possibilities: either we remain German or
> we come under the thumb of the Jews. This latter must not occur; even
> if we are small, we are a force. A well-organized group can conquer a
> strong enemy. If you stick close together and keep bringing in new
> people, we will be victorious over the Jews."

Well Sport..Angela Merkel has insured that Germany would now be under
the thumb of the Muslim free loading hoards.. Still..They are also of
the Semitic tribe of Abraham. From one Jewish Semite invasion to another
Semite Arab Invasion!@

[PaxPerPoten]

On 1/8/2016 11:47 PM, coo...@loon.com wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:59:50 -0600, PaxPerPoten <P...@USA.org> wrote:
>
>> On 1/8/2016 5:39 PM, Topaz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "For us there are only two possibilities: either we remain German or
>>> we come under the thumb of the Jews. This latter must not occur; even
>>> if we are small, we are a force. A well-organized group can conquer a
>>> strong enemy. If you stick close together and keep bringing in new
>>> people, we will be victorious over the Jews."
>>
>> Well Sport..Angela Merkel has insured that Germany would now be under
>> the thumb of the Muslim free loading hoards.. Still..They are also of
>> the Semitic tribe of Abraham. From one Jewish Semite invasion to another
>> Semite Arab Invasion!@
>

> Can't be worse than demented Europeans landing here and killing
> residents for centuries by any means necessary.
>
> THen pretendng to be good Christians.

Is that what your forefathers did? And here you are ..like a babbling
idiot...
Telling us all about it! Have you no shame?

[Topaz]

On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:47:22 -0700, coo...@loon.com wrote:

>
>Can't be worse than demented Europeans landing here and killing
>residents for centuries by any means necessary.
>
>THen pretendng to be good Christians.
>

By David Duke

Go back far enough my friend. Do you really believe that historical
Asian and Amerindian tribal and ethnic groups didn't destroy other
peoples and even different Indian ethnic or tribal groups?
I have a PhD in history and have read extensively on the Indian tribal
histories in the Americas. For instance, every American historian is
aware that Indian tribes fought each other with merciless cruelty
without European interference. The Hurons for instance were almost
totally exterminated by the Iroquois, a closely related tribe. The
Comanche, supreme warriors, terrorized all their neighboring tribes
and had a fierce reputation among Indians for slowly torturing
prisoners of war to death.

The Aztecs, who were far more technologically capable than the other
Indian tribal groups around them, as were the Incas in Peru, were as
imperialist in their world as Europeans were in theirs.

Perhaps your heritage is Arab. You must be aware that Arab slave
traders depopulated whole regions of Black Africa. Would you use this
fact of history to justify the oppression of the Palestinians?

Maybe you are Indian or Pakistani or Malaysian or Persian. No matter
what your heritage is. Maybe you are of African descent, perhaps a
Hutu or Tutsi or Zulu. Look at the record of slavery, conquest,
tribalism, even genocide with open eyes, the same eyes with which you
try to condemn all Europeans!

Don't you realize there is hardly any populated part of India, or
Africa or South America, Asia or Europe, where historically, even
through prehistory, that one group didn't go into another area and
take control through the conquest of war and differential birthrates,
and frankly yes, even genocide.

My friend, cannot you see honestly that all human tribes, ethnic
groups, and races have dirty hands.

If European people have historically done evil things so that today
they deserve annihilation, then you should go ahead and say that all
humanity deserves it, including your own people.

And the fact that almost every human race or tribe has done this kind
of thing in the past, does not make those things right or moral in
today's world.

Hopefully, we have developed a new morality of the relations of one
people with another.

Almost every atrocity, human rights violation and bloody war is based
on real or perceived past wrongs of other peoples and nations. And now
apparently you want to continue that horrific vicious cycle, by
telling me that because of past wrongs real or perceived that
Europeans of whatever nationality have no right to be concerned about
preserving their heritage, their freedom and their human rights.
There is no inherent evil in the European people.

You have been programmed by the Zio extremists to hate their historic
enemy, to hate their enemy so they could use their divide and conquer
strategy.

They work overtime with their control of Hollywood and academia to
demonize European Americans so as to deflect you from the real
controllers of America and the Western World.

If European Americans really controlled the media would they promote
the countless films that constantly evoke emotional feelings of hate
and disgust toward themselves? Would they promote immigration intended
to make them a tiny minority in the government and culture that they
themselves built?

European people historically have had times of imperialism and
expansionism as have all peoples.

But we, and hopefully all enlightened people have learned a new
morality, and become dedicated to the idea that oppression against
other peoples should not continue.

Europeans engaged in slavery, as did all other peoples on Earth, but
every European nation on Earth ended slavery on its own. And then,
Europeans have worked hard around the world to save the lives and
freedom of slaves. A good example is Britain that not only ended the
slave trade of its sovereigns but used the British navy to free slaves
wherever it found such trafficking on Earth and on the high seas.

Remember too that percentage wise, a tiny percent of Europeans owned
slaves. Even in the Southern part of the United States in the
Antebellum South it was less than 5 percent. In Canada, slavery of
other races was almost nonexistent, the same is true in the heart of
Europe.

Did the Arabic people not engage in slavery, or the Asian peoples, the
African peoples, the Indian peoples?

If you think otherwise, then you are extremely naive and biased.
The most horrible aspects of slavery were found in the inhuman aspects
of the slave trade. Watch my video and read my books and you will
learn about the tiny minority of the world's population who were the
world's champions of slavery.

But, has the media given you images of the Jewish slave trader?
No, they have given you countless images of the Christian slaver and
slave trader such as the latest movie Django by the Weinstein Bros.
Studio.

They have instilled in you an obvious emotional hatred about Christian
Europeans, but only the kindest representations of the real tribal
masters of the slave tribe.

Could that be because it is the same hyper-racist tribe that controls
the media?

If you want to hate European people, deny their human rights and wish
for their destruction, then you support the same kinds of crimes for
which you condemn them.

Funny, this European whom you seem to despise, doesn't want to destroy
you or your pepole, while you wish harm upon him and his people. Who
is it that needs a lesson in hypocrisy?

Another fact you might have overlooked in regard to the Indian
question is that modern anthropology has extensive forensic, physical
and DNA evidence that actually Europeans settled in America thousands
of years before the East Asian "Indians" came.

I have read extensively in the latest historical and anthropological
currents in academia, and I realize that it is likely that you know
little about these discoveries and scientific research.

The Zio media has no interest in publicizing into the common
consciousness the latest historic, archeological and genetic evidence
of the presence of European settlers in North America long before the
presence of East Asian "Indian" migrations.

Certainly the theory is controversial in academia, and the
Zio-dominated anthropology since the time of Boas has a vested
interest in denying any evidence that celebrates the heritage of any
people other than their own fellow tribalists.

But the evidence cannot be summarily dismissed, and many prestigious
anthropologists accept the hypothesis. Among them is Dennis J.
Stanford, an archaeologist and Director of the
Paleoindian/Paleoecology Program at the National Museum of Natural
History at the Smithsonian Institution. Another respected academic is
Prof. Bruce Bradley of Exeter university in Britain, who has offered
copious evidence of European presence in North America.

Other scientists have studied Indian tribes deep within the North
American continent and they found distinctly European genes, and by
scientific genetic dating methods, found the presence of European
genes in Amerindian people that dated earlier than Columbus or any
Norse incursions.

If this ultimately becomes scientifically proven, it would show that
these ancient Europeans were basically wiped out by the Asian
migrations, leaving only traces of European genes in some of the
current "native" populations.

The difference is that the Asian invaders didn't create any
reservations, no vast tracts of land for the people whom they
conquered and decimated, the Indian/Asian invaders simply exterminated
and subsumed them all.

This fact of the probable genocide against Europeans in the Americas,
or the horrific invasions into Europe and Western Asia by Mongol
Asians, does not make me hate them or want to suppress them or harm
them in any way!

Arab and Muslim states invaded and ruled over European lands, but I am
not so blind as to not recognize the harsh realities of the Crusades
or European colonialism.

In fact, I personally have much respect, even honor for the Indian
peoples of America. I love how they lived in harmony and respect for
Nature. And they had every right to courageously defend themselves
from the invaders hundreds of years ago, just as Europeans had and
have those same rights to defend their homelands.

Whether or not you believe this is not really important though. In
fact it is ultimately immaterial to the discussion of human rights.
For even if you don't accept this historical concept, it doesn't
change the fact that the ancestors of every people on earth have
committed what by today's standards are called human rights
violations. Even the East Asian people who migrated into the
Americas, themselves undoubtedly have histories of tribal human
aggression against other ethnic expression of mankind stretching back
into Asia in the remote mists of time.

The point is that using collective crimes of any people in the remote
past to justify harming present populations is itself immoral.
For, as I have said, past wrongs, or perceived past wrongs of enemies,
have always been the justification used to commit horrific human
rights crimes.

You might be so attached to your hatred of Europeans which has been
instilled in you by the Zio media, that you can't look at the evidence
objectively. Fueled in great part by the media, anti-European hate is
now practically a religion.

It is similar to the Zio media induced lie that Big Oil controls
American politics when not one of the 40 largest political donors to
Obama and Romney were from oil companies. Or the Zio myth that the
Iraq and Afghanistan Wars were for oil, when not one more drop of oil
was gained from those wars, but the wars cost trillions of dollars
from the American people. The war was not for oil. It was for Israel
and Jewish supremacism.

Or the Zio media inculcated perception that organized crime is
overwhelmingly an Italian thing when the fact is that even in the 2oth
century organized crime has been far more of a "Jewish thing" than an
"Italian institution."

You may have unknowingly developed a visceral hatred of Europeans
because of the portrayal of the African Slave trade to the Americas.
But Jewish Supremacist Steven Spielberg's Amistad effectively covered
up the Jewish domination of this abominable enterprise. Watch my
documentary The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery.

The Zio media doesn't make you conscious about any of this. The
Weinstein Bros and ZioWood do not want you to be aware of the
prominent Jewish role in the slave trade, because they want you to
hate European folks rather than oppose the people who truly exploit
and rule over you today in the Zio Matrix of Media, politics and
finance!

And, of course, they want European Americans to hate themselves so
they will not defend themselves from the real tribal supremacists who
have conquered them.

You need to ask yourself about the mindset in which you now seem to
endorse harm and genocide upon people of European descent.
That's the difference between you and me.

I wish no harm against any other people on this Earth, and I believe
that genocide is the ultimate evil, no matter who it's victims are.
You sir, may be the hypocrite, but I know you don't realize it.

You are not intending to be hypocritical, you have been programmed
this way by the Zio media.

You have been conditioned by the ultimate supremacists on earth, the
Jewish Supremacists, to hate the European people, as many of my own
people have been conditioned to hate themselves.

It is the same force that really runs America and the "American"
media. And they have a stake in you hating European Americans.
It is so they can rule over America and Europe, and ultimately seek
their rule every other race and nation through their control of the
Western nations.

The truth is that the dispossession of European Americans is actually
the ultimate source of the horrific policies of the Zio Globalists who
harm not just the Palestinians, but the entire world.

They want to make African Americans hate European Americans rather
than understand the harm done to them by the Zio supremacists who run
the media that destroys their families, promotes drug and alcohol
abuse and addiction, sexual degeneracies, violence, and other
destruction of the African American community.

They want to make my own people hate themselves so these ultimate
supremacists and haters can rule over us.
I wish the best for you.

I will repeat this until I am blue in the face, until I lose this
aging voice:

I believe that every people has the right to be free and independent,
to preserve and celebrate and enhance their own values, culture and
unique expressions of humanity.

I am the opposite of what is defined as a "racist."

That is because I not only oppose with all my heart and soul the
oppression of any race or any people, I believe that every unique
expression of humanity has the right to be free and should be
preserved, even enhanced in its unique expressions of culture and art
and philosophy.

I believe no people has the right to enslave or exploit or harm any
other people.

I believe in human rights for all people, and by that I mean every
people on earth, including the European people.

I believe that there is never, ever an excuse to deny people their
basic human rights. Nothing ever justifies harming the innocent.
I believe that different peoples can and should be able to work out
their disagreements without war and hate and harm.
But I also know that we are ruled by a tiny tribal extremist minority
that maintains their power and control over us by a divide and conquer
strategy.

Even those misguided miscreants should be treated with human rights in
mind. But those who commit crimes should answer for them within the
bounds of law and justice. I also believe that they must be deposed
from their malevolent influence over us and over the Earth.
They must be dethroned from their power over the media, International
Finance and Politics.

I hope I have afforded you another perspective on a very emotional
issue for so many people.

Please Wake up!
All peoples have the right to human rights, even those you might
despise!

Best Wishes to You,
Dr. David Duke

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/8/2016 7:13 PM, coo...@loon.com wrote:

> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:39:22 -0600, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "For us there are only two possibilities: either we remain German or
>> we come under the thumb of the Jews.
>

> Substittute "American" for German, and "Conservatives" for "jews"
>
>
> THEN you'd have a real story
>

I do agree with you, here. The liberal Democrats are
behaving much like Hitler and the Nazis in what they
do. Trying to silence the traditional conservatives.

It is my prayer that the Americans of today do not
manage to silence the conservatives of today.

[Stormin Mormon]

On 1/9/2016 12:47 AM, coo...@loon.com wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:59:50 -0600, PaxPerPoten <P...@USA.org> wrote:
>

>> Well Sport..Angela Merkel has insured that Germany would now be under
>> the thumb of the Muslim free loading hoards.. Still..They are also of
>> the Semitic tribe of Abraham. From one Jewish Semite invasion to another
>> Semite Arab Invasion!@
>

> Can't be worse than demented Europeans landing here and killing
> residents for centuries by any means necessary.
>
> THen pretendng to be good Christians.
>

Plenty of Muslims being imported into the USA. The
next few years are going to be interesting. And,
not in a good way.

[Cruzing to the White House, Trumping the Libs]

Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:p2i09b168rpa1g4u9...@4ax.com:

>
> "For us there are only two possibilities: either we remain German or
> we come under the thumb of the Jews.

Apparently there was a third option, death.

--
Notice: This poster is politically incorrect. I say 'Merry Christmas,' 'God
bless America.' I salute our flag and give thanks to our troops, police
officers and firefighters. If this offends you, you are welcome to leave.
In God we trust. All others, fuck off.

[Topaz]

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:18:30 -0500, Stormin Mormon
<cayo...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>I do agree with you, here. The liberal Democrats are
>behaving much like Hitler and the Nazis in what they
>do. Trying to silence the traditional conservatives.
>
>It is my prayer that the Americans of today do not
>manage to silence the conservatives of today.

National Socialist Germany was not different from other countries
in regard to free speech laws. Before Hitler was in power he had a lot
of his papers banned. Hitler said:

"You talk about persecution!" (to an address by the Social Democratic
speaker) "I think that there are only a few of us [in our party] here
who did not have to suffer persecutions in prison from your side ...
You seem to have totally forgotten that for years our shirts were
ripped off our backs because you did not like the color . . . In those
days, our newspapers were banned and banned and again banned, our
meetings were forbidden, and we were forbidden to speak, I was
forbidden to speak, for years on. And now you say that criticism is
salutary!"

Even today most countries do not have free speech. In liberal
Germany today people get arrested for doubting the holo story and
other things. People in Britain get arrested for politically incorrect
speech or writing. Saying that the races are not all equal in
intelligence is against the law there.

The United States has the most free speech but even here it has
banned things. At one time the play "Merchant of Venice" was banned in
New York because it offended the Jews. People in America were arrested
for their beliefs during WWII. All countries did that.

But the United States does have the most free speech and this was a
great idea. Hitler also had a great idea of removing the Jews from
controlling the media. If we could combine these two ideas we could
have a winning combination. Allowing free speech is not the same as
allowing one unelected group to virtually control all of the media.
The media is the real power, and a minor post such as President of the
United States is nothing by comparison. Why are we voting for
President and not voting for who will control the media? When it comes
to owning TV stations it is only money that talks, not morality or
virtue.

If one wants to name the group that is most guilty of censoring what
others have to say I would nominate the Jews. But in their Jewish
controlled media they have the gall to point fingers at Hitler.

[Topaz]

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:21:15 -0500, Stormin Mormon
<cayo...@hotmail.com> wrote:


>
>Plenty of Muslims being imported into the USA. The
>next few years are going to be interesting. And,
>not in a good way.

We should have a nation for White people.

The West is the White race.

The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.

And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.

Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.

Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan

"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving
a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single
word."

[Topaz]

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:30:01 -0000 (UTC), "Cruzing to the White House,
Trumping the Libs" <nuke_them_...@sulaco.com> wrote:

>Notice: This poster is politically incorrect. I say 'Merry Christmas,' 'God
>bless America.' I salute our flag and give thanks to our troops, police
>officers and firefighters. If this offends you, you are welcome to leave.
>In God we trust. All others, fuck off.

In the past at Christmas time there was colored lights everywhere.
Now all you see are plain white lights. The colored lights represented
Christmas. The plain white lights represent Happy Holidays and Seasons
Greetings. The government wants nothing at all to do with Christmas.
It is not politically correct.


The Jewish Grinch Who Stole Christmas
2006-12-06

When it comes to pushing the multicultural, anti-Christian, agenda,
you find Jewish judges, Jewish journalists and the ACLU at the
forefront.
By Burt Prelutsky

I never thought I'd live to see the day that Christmas would become a
dirty word. You think it hasn't? Then why is it that people are being
prevented from saying it in polite society for fear that it will
offend?

Schools are being forced to replace "Christmas vacation" with "winter
break" in their printed schedules. At some major retail chains, the
word is verboten, replaced as a matter of policy by the generic Happy
Holidays. Carols, even instrumental versions, are banned in certain
locales. A major postal delivery service has not only made their
drivers doff their Santa caps, but ordered them not to decorate their
trucks with Christmas wreaths.

How is it, one well might ask, that in a Christian nation this is
happening? And in case you find that designation objectionable, would
you deny that India is a Hindu country, that Turkey is Muslim, that
Poland is Catholic? That doesn't mean those nations are theocracies.
But when the overwhelming majority of a country's population is of one
religion, and most Americans happen to be one sort of Christian or
another, only a darn fool would deny the obvious That has changed, as
you may have noticed. And I blame my fellow Jews. When it comes to
pushing the multicultural, anti-Christian, agenda, you find Jewish
judges, Jewish journalists and the ACLU at the forefront...

It is the ACLU, which is overwhelmingly Jewish in terms of membership
and funding, that is leading the attack against Christianity in
America. It is they who have conned far too many people into believing
that the phrase "separation of church and state" actually exists
somewhere in the Constitution.