info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why do the Apple Apologists deny facts & habitually fabricate imaginary content?
38 views
Skip to first unread message
Harold Newton
Dec 30, 2017, 4:19:56 PM12/30/17
to
Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
They're *different* from normal people.
a. They brazenly fabricate imaginary iOS functionality
b. They brazenly fabricate (and then respond to) nonexistent quoted content
c. They repeatedly and openly deny that which Apple already admitted
Why?
For example, just today, the Apple Apologist "Jolly Roger" brazenly
fabricated quoted content, and then responded to that quoted content, as if
it actually occurred - but he made it all up.
Why?
For example, Snit brazenly fabricated iOS functionality that never existed,
and then repeatedly posted (over four hundred times!) that brazen
fabrication, and is *still posting* that same brazen fabrication of iOS
functionality that doesn't exist and never did.
Why?
What is wrong with their adult discussion skills that they repeatedly deny
that which even Apple admitted - and they fabricate iOS functionality that
never existed?
For example, Lewis and nospam just posted incessant and repeated denials of
what Apple already has admitted.
Why?
What the heck is so different about the iOS apologists that they feel they
must fabricate almost everything in order to get their particular view
across?
Why don't the Apple Apologists act like normal adults do on Usenet?
They're *different* from normal people.
a. They brazenly fabricate imaginary iOS functionality
b. They brazenly fabricate (and then respond to) nonexistent quoted content
c. They repeatedly and openly deny that which Apple already admitted
Why?
For example, just today, the Apple Apologist "Jolly Roger" brazenly
fabricated quoted content, and then responded to that quoted content, as if
it actually occurred - but he made it all up.
Why?
For example, Snit brazenly fabricated iOS functionality that never existed,
and then repeatedly posted (over four hundred times!) that brazen
fabrication, and is *still posting* that same brazen fabrication of iOS
functionality that doesn't exist and never did.
Why?
What is wrong with their adult discussion skills that they repeatedly deny
that which even Apple admitted - and they fabricate iOS functionality that
never existed?
For example, Lewis and nospam just posted incessant and repeated denials of
what Apple already has admitted.
Why?
What the heck is so different about the iOS apologists that they feel they
must fabricate almost everything in order to get their particular view
across?
Why don't the Apple Apologists act like normal adults do on Usenet?
Jolly Roger
Dec 30, 2017, 4:21:56 PM12/30/17
to
On 2017-12-30, Harold Newton <har...@example.com> wrote:
>
> Why do the Apple Hating Trolls like me spend literal hours upon hours
> every day of the week insulting and belittling complete strangers in
> the Apple news groups?
Pure jealousy.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.
JR
>
> Why do the Apple Hating Trolls like me spend literal hours upon hours
> every day of the week insulting and belittling complete strangers in
> the Apple news groups?
Pure jealousy.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.
JR
Lloyd
Dec 30, 2017, 4:31:14 PM12/30/17
to
Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> Wrote in message:
I'm sure that's part of it. But since his little willy won't
stand up these days it is all he's got! :)
--
Lloyd
stand up these days it is all he's got! :)
--
Lloyd
Carlos E.R.
Dec 30, 2017, 4:36:08 PM12/30/17
to
On 2017-12-30 22:19, Harold Newton wrote:
> Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
Why do you have to post this to alt.os.linux? Are you so bored that you
> Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
resort to spamming other groups?
--
Cheers, Carlos.
Snit
Dec 30, 2017, 4:42:04 PM12/30/17
to
On 12/30/17, 2:19 PM, in article p28vtq$f1k$1...@news.mixmin.net, "Harold
easy it was to find things iOS does that Android does not... even you noted
to get SOME of what I pointed out done on Android you would need additional
hardware.
> and then repeatedly posted (over four hundred times!) that brazen
> fabrication, and is *still posting* that same brazen fabrication of iOS
> functionality that doesn't exist and never did.
>
> Why?
>
> What is wrong with their adult discussion skills that they repeatedly deny
> that which even Apple admitted - and they fabricate iOS functionality that
> never existed?
>
> For example, Lewis and nospam just posted incessant and repeated denials of
> what Apple already has admitted.
>
> Why?
>
> What the heck is so different about the iOS apologists that they feel they
> must fabricate almost everything in order to get their particular view
> across?
>
> Why don't the Apple Apologists act like normal adults do on Usenet?
See you changed your name again to avoid kill filters. But you are not a
troll, right?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Newton" <har...@example.com> wrote:
> Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
>
> They're *different* from normal people.
>
> a. They brazenly fabricate imaginary iOS functionality
> b. They brazenly fabricate (and then respond to) nonexistent quoted content
> c. They repeatedly and openly deny that which Apple already admitted
>
> Why?
>
> For example, just today, the Apple Apologist "Jolly Roger" brazenly
> fabricated quoted content, and then responded to that quoted content, as if
> it actually occurred - but he made it all up.
>
> Why?
>
> For example, Snit brazenly fabricated iOS functionality that never existed,
A direct lie from you, and told because it pissed you off that I noted how
> Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
>
> They're *different* from normal people.
>
> a. They brazenly fabricate imaginary iOS functionality
> b. They brazenly fabricate (and then respond to) nonexistent quoted content
> c. They repeatedly and openly deny that which Apple already admitted
>
> Why?
>
> For example, just today, the Apple Apologist "Jolly Roger" brazenly
> fabricated quoted content, and then responded to that quoted content, as if
> it actually occurred - but he made it all up.
>
> Why?
>
> For example, Snit brazenly fabricated iOS functionality that never existed,
easy it was to find things iOS does that Android does not... even you noted
to get SOME of what I pointed out done on Android you would need additional
hardware.
> and then repeatedly posted (over four hundred times!) that brazen
> fabrication, and is *still posting* that same brazen fabrication of iOS
> functionality that doesn't exist and never did.
>
> Why?
>
> What is wrong with their adult discussion skills that they repeatedly deny
> that which even Apple admitted - and they fabricate iOS functionality that
> never existed?
>
> For example, Lewis and nospam just posted incessant and repeated denials of
> what Apple already has admitted.
>
> Why?
>
> What the heck is so different about the iOS apologists that they feel they
> must fabricate almost everything in order to get their particular view
> across?
>
> Why don't the Apple Apologists act like normal adults do on Usenet?
troll, right?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Jolly Roger
Dec 30, 2017, 4:47:06 PM12/30/17
to
groups, dontchaknow! ; )
nospam
Dec 30, 2017, 4:52:22 PM12/30/17
to
In article <pcdlhe-...@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R.
because it's a troll.
note the nymshift.
note the nymshift.
RJH
Dec 31, 2017, 5:30:48 AM12/31/17
to
On 30/12/2017 21:19, Harold Newton wrote:
> Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdWT8e8CUDM
> Why do the Apple Apologists act the strange way they do on Usenet?
>
:-)
--
Cheers, Rob
Dan Jenkins
Dec 31, 2017, 9:59:01 AM12/31/17
to
What a self-satisfied bunch of pricks Android users are.
I'm not a sheep.
I've got my own mind.
You haven't unplugged from the matrix.
You're not off the grid because you bought a Samsung.
It's a massive corporation . it's not a family owned business . two
brothers . Sam and Sung . set up in a little market store . knocking out
phones.
You're not better than me.
And they love to talk about the battery life. Oh my God.
I imagine you're looking for a plug point - ha ha ha. Shut up Mate!
The shit battery life is the best thing about smart phones.
Because then I'll interact with my kids.
Harold Newton
Jan 17, 2018, 10:05:29 PM1/17/18
to
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:19:55 -0000 (UTC), Harold Newton wrote:
> Why don't the Apple Apologists act like normal adults do on Usenet?
Yet again today, the Apple Appologists Jolly Roger and nospam incessantly
> Why don't the Apple Apologists act like normal adults do on Usenet?
fabricate completely imaginary non-existing functionality:
Does a free second phone number exist (like Sideline used to be?)
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/v2jecdtNpHU>
Where the ill-educated Apple Apologists fabricate fictional functionality.
The question is *why* the Apple Apologists feel the incessant need to
constantly fabricate fictional functionality that even they know doesn't
exist?
0 new messages