Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why do Apple Apologists constantly brazenly fabricate what turns out to be wholly imaginary Apple functionality?
50 views
Skip to first unread message
Arlen G. Holder
Aug 2, 2019, 6:02:02 PM8/2/19
to
Why do Apple Apologists constantly brazenly fabricate what turns out to be
wholly imaginary Apple functionality?
As a result, their credibility is worse than the outcome of a coin toss.
The Apple Apologist nospam just did it yet again by brazenly fabricating
Apple functionality that nobody on this planet has ever shown to exist.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Jx7tJwfyR9M/Wx5XcP0WCQAJ>
Hence... the question is _why_ apologists do what apologists always do?
o *Why do Apologists insist that brazenly fabricated functionality exists?*
wholly imaginary Apple functionality?
As a result, their credibility is worse than the outcome of a coin toss.
The Apple Apologist nospam just did it yet again by brazenly fabricating
Apple functionality that nobody on this planet has ever shown to exist.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Jx7tJwfyR9M/Wx5XcP0WCQAJ>
Hence... the question is _why_ apologists do what apologists always do?
o *Why do Apologists insist that brazenly fabricated functionality exists?*
Alan Baker
Aug 2, 2019, 6:15:23 PM8/2/19
to
On 2019-08-02 3:02 p.m., Arlen G. Holder wrote:
> Why do Apple Apologists constantly brazenly fabricate what turns out to be
> wholly imaginary Apple functionality?
Example?
> Why do Apple Apologists constantly brazenly fabricate what turns out to be
> wholly imaginary Apple functionality?
>
> As a result, their credibility is worse than the outcome of a coin toss.
>
> The Apple Apologist nospam just did it yet again by brazenly fabricating
> Apple functionality that nobody on this planet has ever shown to exist.
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Jx7tJwfyR9M/Wx5XcP0WCQAJ>
Have you go any other example?
Arlen G. Holder
Aug 2, 2019, 6:34:55 PM8/2/19
to
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:15:22 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> Have you go any other example?
Sure.
> Have you go any other example?
I'm not an apologist who is immune to facts, Alan Baker.
My belief system is not only _based_ on facts, Alan Baker...
o But my belief system is _bolstered_ by facts.
Here's another:
o Why do the Apple Apologists constantly send poor unsuspecting iOS users on wild goose chases?
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/ynh0PE9lK_I/QOiGP4_SFQAJ>
Every brazenly fabricated claim of Apple functionality in that thread was
dead wrong, Alan Baker ... and if you dispute that fact - you'll need to
take it up with both the original posters - AND - David Empson.
0 new messages