On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 07:53:12 -0500, nospam wrote:
> i never said everyone wants to be on the cutting edge.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:55:27 +0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote:
> I'm not sure I would agree with all that -- nospam *has* been helpful
> to me in the past. I just wish he would realize not everyone is or
> wants to be on the cutting edge of iPhone technology. Many people
> prefer the old functionality either for practical or personal reasons
> and the new way is not always better.
Hi badgolferman,
Only if you already KNOW the answer, will you NOT waste your time with
nospam's sadistically intentioned wild-goose chases.
I agree nospam is DIFFERENT than the other score of apologists.
It's almost Apple pays nospam by the post to flatly refute anything &
everything that isn't complementary to Apple Marketing Propaganda.
What's different about nospam is clear when he skirts around a question.
o You have to actually know the answer, to skirt it like he does
Others, like Jolly Roger, Lewis, BK, et al., are too ignorant to do that.
o They simply post complete & utter bullshit easily shown to be so.
With nospam, he'll actually play his silly games around the issue.
o Which is what he did here
That means nospam has a DIFFERENT MOTIVE than the rest.
o For the Jolly Roger type - they're just defending their Apple choice
o To the Jolly Roger type, anything truthful about Apple is "against" Apple
o In fact, this type has often said I hate Apple products
o Because _that's_ how _their_ mind works
o They think if you say the truth about a product - you must hate it.
o They don't realize that adults say the truth about all products.
In the case of nospam, he's definitely "playing games".
o Very often, nospam is utterly ignorant though
o Take the case of iPhone X throttling software for just one
o He refuted it out of hand - and yet - it is well known to exist
In the case of the wifi signal strength, nospam did the same thing.
o He refutes out of hand anything truthful not complementary to Apple
That's why nospam's credibility is utterly worthless.
o This is sad because nospam actually is smarter than the others
I've often said he could be a "defense" lawyer
o Because he refutes everything without ever using any facts
A prosecution lawyer could never get away with nospam's tactics
o A prosecution lawyer would be bound to prove his statements
The PROBLEM, badgolferman, with nospam's tactics is that he (and the
others) send poor unsuspecting users on wild goose chases.
Why?
o Why does nospam delight in sending users on wild goose chases?
<
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.ipad/yfBisViO0Rs>
It's sad he does that - where - luckily - he wasn't able to connive you
into a senseless journey chasing wild geese - but ONLY because you knew the
answer ahead of time.
In summary, the ONLY reason nospam wasn't successful in sending you on a
senseless wild-goose chase, was that you didn't BELIEVE a word nospam said.
That's the ONLY logical conclusion one can make with ANYTHING nospam says
o He distorts the truth to send you on a wild goose chase
Only if you already KNOW the answer, will you NOT waste your time with
nospam's sadistically intentioned wild-goose chases.