Diabetes (the word) Delusions / Confusion / Misinformation

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

- - -
Preface

The following article, it's about the impact
of sugar-sweetened beverages on increasing
the risk of only 1 specific type of High
Glucose Condition (HGC).

End Preface
- - -

Diabetes, when used as it often is, without
clarifier, it tosses over 80 disparate condi-
tions into ONE, yielding false and misleading
information.

The following article, it only applies to 1
specific type of High Glucose Condition (HGC),
the type that over 85% of Americans have (Pre-
ventable Cellosis, new name created in 2016
for preventable type 2 diabetes, estimated
that 90% of Cellosis is preventable).

The following article, it ignores the fact
that its use of the diabetes word without
clarifier, almost 99% of the specific types
of diabetes are NOT caused by anything to
do with lifestyle or sugar.

What the article failed to convey regarding
the diabetes word it used 5 times without
any clarification of the only type of
diabetes it was referring to?

Detailed below, the almost 99% of specific
types of diabetes that the article fails
to point out are NOT caused by lifestyle /
sugar. I've used the outdated diabetes
clarifier terms side-by-side with the new ...

... clarifying terms I created in 2010,
specific types created in 2016 describing
85 specific types which the diabetes word
does NOT apply to in the following article:

o type 1 diabetes (Insulitis Insulinitis)

o all diabetes which results
from near-total to total loss
of endogenous insulin (Insulinitis,
11 specific types including Insulitis
Insulinitis, the type that the over-
whelming majority with Insulinitis
have)

o latent autoimmune diabetes, aka type 1.5
diabetes (Latent Autoimmune Insulinitis)

o unpreventable type 2 diabetes (Unpreventable
Cellosis, 20 specific types, estimated that
10% of Cellosis is unpreventable)

o maturity onset diabetes
of the young (Diminosis, 11 specific types)

o neonatal diabetes (Neonatal Diminosis, 8
permanent types, 4 transient types)

o other diabetes mellitus (Ohiglucons, 24
specific types)

o diabetes insipidus (Insipidus, 4 specific
types are non-glucose anomalies, 2 specific
types include high glucose)

No mention of any disparate types of HGCs
in the article. No mention of the fact that
almost 99% of the specific types of HGCs
have nothing to do with only type of HGC
the article was referring to (one specific
type, Preventable Cellosis).

Diabetes without clarifier is used 5 times in
the article [replaced with clarification, in-
cluding the only specific type of condition
actually involved, Preventable Cellosis, in
the following inserts, not part of the orig-
inal article]:

- - -
November 7, 2017

Just two cans of fizzy drinks [sugar-sweet-
ened beverages] increase risk of [Preventable
Cellosis], heart disease
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/071117/just-two-cans-of-fizzy-drinks-increase-risk-of-diabetes-heart-disease.html
- - -

Sugary drinks, such as cola and lemonade, are
known to lead to [Preventable Cellosis] by
causing a spike in blood sugar levels.

Just two cans of fizzy drinks are enough to
increase the risk of [Preventable Cellosis],
high blood pressure and heart disease, ac-
cording to a new research.

...

High-levels of sugary beverages are long-
known to cause obesity and lead to chronic
illness, soda consumption is steadily ris-
ing among all age groups worldwide.

Researchers say the drinks are 'energy dense'
and their consumption has been associated
with excessive caloric intake and subsequent
weight gain.

In the study, individuals consuming sugary
beverages for 10 weeks displayed a 17 per-
cent decrease in insulin sensitivity.

... [A researcher said] "Sugar-sweetened
beverage consumption is steadily rising
among all age groups worldwide. Our anal-
ysis revealed that most epidemiological
studies strongly show that frequent intake
of these beverages contributes to the ...

... onset of the metabolic syndrome,
[Preventable Cellosis] and hypertension."

Many of the analysed studies found drink-
ing at least one sugar-sweetened beverage
a day was associated with elevated blood
pressure.

The United Nations warned six years ago
that chronic diseases posed a greater
health risk than infectious diseases.

A 12-ounce can of Coca-Cola contains 39
grams of sugar and 140 calories.

Professor Essop added, "Excess sugar con-
sumption has surfaced as one of the most
prominent global dietary changes during
the past few decades and is considered a
primary driver of cardiometabolic diseases
onset."

He concluded by saying, "The findings dem-
onstrate there is a clear need for public
education about the harmful effects of
excess consumption of sugar-sweetened
beverages."

The study was published in the Journal of
the Endocrine Society.

- - - end excerpts - - -

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

You may reduce your risk of getting only one
of the disparate HGCs with lifestyle changes,
Preventable Cellosis. For details on

1) what the close to 80 disparate High
Glucose Conditions are all about,

2) what the 4 specific types of a
non-glucose anomaly (Insipidus)
are all about (2 specific types
of Insipidus include high glucose),

3) what the 21 specific types of
Hut (Hypoglycemia Uncaused by
Treatments for High Glucose) are
all about,

see

Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst
http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

- - -

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER

C.ure I.nsulinitis A.ssociation
http://prohuman.net/cureinsulinitisassociation.htm

Glucose Anomalies Research regarding
Potential Cures / Improvements in Treatments
http://prohuman.net/glucoseanomaliesresearch.htm

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

You may reduce your risk of getting only one
of the disparate HGCs with lifestyle changes,
Preventable Cellosis. For details on

1) what the close to 80 disparate High
Glucose Conditions are all about,

2) what the 4 specific types of a
non-glucose anomaly (Insipidus)
are all about (2 specific types
of Insipidus include high glucose),

3) what the 21 specific types of
Hut (Hypoglycemia Uncaused by
Treatments for High Glucose) are
all about,

see

Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst
http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

C.ure I.nsulinitis A.ssociation
http://prohuman.net/cureinsulinitisassociation.htm

Glucose Anomalies Research regarding
Potential Cures / Improvements in Treatments
http://prohuman.net/glucoseanomaliesresearch.htm

- - -

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER

I Do Not Like Diabetes Here or There,
I Do Not Like Diabetes Anywhere
https://smile.amazon.com/Not-Like-Diabetes-Anywhere-shirt/dp/B01N25FMMI/ref=pd_d0_recs_v2_cwb_193_3?_encoding=UTF8&refRID=WJHV2S8X0YG21Z9WVQD5&th=1

A cup which can be interpreted as the way
most feel regarding the individual disparate
condition (one of over 80 disparate High
Glucose Conditions and 4 non-glucose ...

... anomalies) which, in a confusing and
misleading way, is often called diabetes
without a clarifier, -and- the way I (and
many others) feel about that word (and the
diabetic word) being used at all:
https://smile.amazon.com/Fight-Diabetes-Research-Survivor-Supporter/dp/B072J1VWBV/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1508425879&sr=8-4&keywords=diabetes+research

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

[AntiPro&T1DM]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> *Useless* clarifying terms I created

Nobody cares. You'll drive yourself crazy. Happy Thanksgiving.
--
APT1DM
Exposing Mustang-Pro's flaws and educating Pro on proper DM terminology!
Pro is the ONLY 1 Confused in ~8.4 Billion people on Earth w/DM terminology.
Mustang-Pro's Cheat-Sheet: Target BG is (120+70)/2 = 95 mg/dl.

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

- - -
November 7, 2017

Diabetes (the word) Delusions / Confusion / Misinformation
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.health.diabetes/0J5CqdbTyko/36uLLf_aAwAJ
- - -

The article referenced in that post, the
diabetes word was used in the title and
4 times in the article without any clar-
ifier, and every use of that word applied
to only 1 of the 86 disparate specific
types of High Glucose Conditions + 4 non-
glucose anomalies:

Only Preventable Cellosis

The title and link to that article replaced
with clarification, [including the only spe-

cific type of condition actually involved,
Preventable Cellosis, in the following

inserts, not part of the original title]:

- - -
November 7, 2017

Just two cans of fizzy drinks [sugar-

sweetened beverages] increase risk of

[Preventable Cellosis], heart disease
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/071117/just-two-cans-of-fizzy-drinks-increase-risk-of-diabetes-heart-disease.html
- - -

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Article with some examples of the many
people who support the types of name
changes I've been promoting since 2010.

The preponderance of the media which
promotes the idea that only -2- types
of diabetes exist (sometimes mentioning
a 3rd type, rarely mentioning any other ...

... type), as well as the impact of
using the diabetes word as if it were
a single disease rather than over 80
disparate specific types, you can see
the result within many of the comments
below.

Some of the spelling errors fixed in the
following:

- - -
April 10, 2013

Rename Diabetes?
https://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/blog/rename-diabetes/
- - -

The post I made in response to that article on
October 23, 2010:

In 2010, I created a detailed proposition for
changing all diabetes names -and- the confusing
reactive hypoglycemia name:

Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst

(superb) http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

Name changes for old outdated diabetes and diabetic
words are desperately needed to eliminate the
confusion and misleading that transpires when those
words are used without clarifiers, which often happens.

From reviewing the 91 comments made prior to today
(October 23, 2017), it appears that about 45 of the
91 posters might be open to the name changes I created
in 2010. I suggest that folks visit that web article
to understand the comprehensive nature of the name ...

... changes, which total (the diabetes name changes
and the reactive hypoglycemia name changes) close to
100 new specific types of glucose anomalies (6 apply
to the mostly non-glucose anomaly Insipidus).

A brief summary of what the article linked to above
contains:

dark red = Insulinitis (type 1 diabetes, juvenile
diabetes, insulin dependent diabetes, rapid onset
near-total to total loss of endogenous insulin),
11 specific types, 3 specific types disputed

dark pink = Latent Autoimmune Insulinitis (latent
autoimmune diabetes, slow onset Insulinitis),
1 specific type

dark blue = PreCellosis (prediabetes, but only
applies to increased risk of getting Cellosis),
Cellosis (type 2 diabetes, continued but reduced
insulin production over time, typically slow onset),
21 specific types

light blue = Gestational Cellosis (gestational
diabetes), 1 specific type (transient but can
increase the risk of later getting Cellosis)

dark green = Diminosis (maturity onset diabetes
of the young, diminished but continuing insulin
production caused by a monogenetic defect),
11 specific types

light green = Neonatal Diminosis (neonatal diabetes,
diminished but continuing insulin production caused
by a monogenetic defect in the first 6 months after
birth), 8 specific types are permanent, 4 specific
types are transient

purple = Ohiglucons, Other High Glucose Conditions
(other diabetes mellitus), 24 specific types:
- 5 specific types are drug or chemical-induced,
- 5 specific types result from endocrinopathies,
- 7 specific types involve exocrine or pancreas
diseases or surgical treatment,
- 4 specific types result from insulin action defects,
- 2 specific types result from other genetic syndromes,
- 1 specific type results from anti-insulin receptor
antibodies

gray = Insipidus (diabetes insipidus), 6 specific types
(4 are non-glucose anomalies, 2 specifc types
include high glucose)

bright red = Hypoglycemia Uncaused by Treatments for
High Glucose, Hut (reactive hypoglycemia,
hyperinsulinism), 21 specific types


...

Budhita - 2 months ago

This inaccuracy keeps T1D from getting the
interest and funding needed for a cure by
being mixed up with a metabolic disorder.

...

David Bolt - 4 years ago

... Good Luck with this petition, It is
long overdue.

...

Joanne Bassett - 5 years ago

I agree the names need to be changed. ...
If different names for Type 1 & Type 2
diabetes can help people understand it,
then by all means, change the names!

...

Larry - 5 years ago

The two conditions have similar symptoms
but they are not the same at all. They
should have different names. Medical
science has allowed us to learn the
difference.

Having a cold and having hay fever have
similar symptoms but they have different
names. Type 1 and Type 2 names should be
updated.

...

Joe - 5 years ago

A lot of folks seem more worried about
what other people think than how it
affects their own disease management.

These kind of comments almost always
come from those affected by type 1, or
their loved ones.

They seem to be extremely concerned
someone might confuse their disease
with the "other" diabetes, or that
type 2 might be taking away attention
from their affliction.

There is also the slightest indication
that they consider type 2 to be less
"honorable" than type 1. For their
sake I would be fine with renaming
both diseases.

...

jon T. Wilkins - 5 years ago

I have had Type 1 for 40 years. Mostly
I find that a name change would help
when writing articles about diabetes.

many times one starts reading but learns
they are talking about type 2. It would
be helpful to know which one as there
are many differences in the kinds of
diabetes.

...

Dee Fones - 5 years ago

My opinion is to find a new name! Maybe
at the same time some marketing guru
could help with advertising to change
misconceptions and educate people.

...

J. C. - 5 years ago

Yes, absolutely change the names.

...

Both my parents, two of my grandparents,
my only sibling, and several cousins
have been type 2 -- more than 10 people
in my immediate family. No one in my
family was type 1.

Although I know MANY type 2 diabetics,
I know only one type 1, a classmate of
my son. I think that ratio is truly
representative of the incidence of
type 1 versus type 2.

Everyone deserves help and to have
their medical condition researched,
but because of the differences, the
conditions need separate research,
and separate fundraising for research
for each type, and that can happen
only if the different diseases are
clear.

...

Lisa Fown - 5 years ago

I am a mother of two twin girls that
both got type 1 when one was 13 months
old and the other twin was 15 months
old they are 23 years old now.

I have been saying for 22 years the
names need to and must be changed there
is too much confusion.

There are too many commercials that
advertise food for type 2 to lose
weight and they very rarely say just
for type 2 so the majority of the
population when they hear Diabetes
just know about type 2.

So in a lot of peoples mind if you
have diabetes all have do is eat
right and exercise and the diabetes
will go away. I don't know how many
times I have heard well they can get
rid of the diabetes or grow out of
it because they are misinformed.

I took one of my daughters to the
ER when they were toddlers and the
"nurse" checking us in ask "she will
grow out of it right?" there is a
very BIG difference in the two
diseases.

Everyone that ask me I always tell
them that they are two separate
diseases and Type 1 is much more
severe. My daughters could die in
the middle of the night, my daughters
have had thousands of pokes during
their life.

they have to watch when they are
sick, if they exercise too much,
if they have too much stress, if
they eat something and get the carb
count wrong etc

everything can effect their blood
sugars. Most people have no idea
what a type 1 diabetic goes through
in a day.

I always have been an advocate for
my girls - one of my daughters is
in college away from home so I found
a way to get her a diabetic dog to
be with her at all time.

I obtained information on sensors
that help let you know when your
blood sugars are going up and down
and they both have sensors along
with their pumps now.

I also called Columbus Ohio when I
read an article about the islet cell
study they were doing and talk to
one of the head people to see if my
girls would qualify to get the islet
cells that was supposed to get rid
of the diabetes.

what i found out that only people who
have had transplants such as a kidney
transplants were eligible because you
had to be on the medications for trans-
plant patients so body would not reject
the cells and the cost was around $1,000
a month and insurance was not covering
it.

so as you see i worry about my daughters
everyday and would do anything to help
make their lives easier.

I had a conversation just last week with
my daughter that we need get the name
"diabetes" changed also we were trying
to figure out the best way to do it.

to find out someone else is already doing
it is just amazing! This name has to be
changed because it will show that they
are different diseases and Type 1 doesn't
have anything to do with amount you eat
or dieting.

i am willing to help in any way to help
get this done. what my girls go through
on a daily basis. I have found my daughters
too many times with a low blood sugar were
they are convulsing and i have had to give
them a glucagon shot and they have been in
the hospital more times then I can count
especially when they were toddlers.

A name change would give people with Type 1
diabetes such a sense of satisfaction to
know people would know what disease they
have and stop confusing their disease and
saying just start eating right and you will
get rid of your disease

some people assume that someone with Type 1
brought their disease on themselves which
can not be further from the truth!!!

...

Di A. Beet Tees - 5 years ago

YES, two distinct names will save lives as
the dietary recommendations and treatments
for type I versus type 2 are different.

Further, the medical community is confused
by treatments based on the study of one
that is applied to two, and vice versa.

...

Kris - 5 years ago

I believe a name change would be very
helpful. I've been a Type 1 (originally
called Juvenile) for the last 40 years.

As more and more people were diagnosed
with Type 2, I found myself explaining
to more and more lay people why I couldn't
just get by with a better diet and some
exercise.

Worse than that, however, lately I've
found actual medical personnel in walk-in
clinics that don't seem to know the dif-
ference!!

No, they aren't endocrinologists but
I would expect that a basic medical
education would explain the difference.
Apparently it doesn't and/or they don't
remember which is which.

In either case, something needs to be
done to help both lay and professional
people keep them straight!!

...

Karen - 5 years ago

Oh my heavens...YES - there is a medical
need to differentiate between Type 1 and
Type 2 diabetes. I have thought about this
for many years. I have 5 children, 3 of
which have Type 1 diabetes. I, myself,
have Type 1 diabetes as well.

There is absolutely NO comparison between
these two diseases. Having lived with
another person who has Type 2 diabetes,
we may as well be on opposite sides of
the planet.

...

- - - end excerpts - - -

- - -

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER, endeavoring to
fix all of the issues mentioned above,
and more, as well as promoting new
clarifying names for over 80 disparate
specific types of High Glucose Conditions
and 4 specific types of a non-glucose ...

... anomaly Insipidus (with Insipidus
also having 2 specific types with high
glucose), as well as 21 specific types
of hypoglycemia uncaused by any treat-
ments for high glucose (Hut) at the
best diabetes name change article on ...

... the web (Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes
Bubble Burst Burst) http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

- - -

[AntiPro&T1DM]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> November 7, 2017

That's where I stopped reading.

Your terminology obscures the topic of your post so nobody reads them.

Do you remember the kid that cried "Wolf" to many times?

[AntiPro&T1DM]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> Karen - 5 years ago

Well, you clearly have failed to promote your terminology in 5 years.

You must be doing something wrong.

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

- - -

The alarm is the reality of what has existed
since the first clarifier was used (and failed
to end the frequent use of the diabetes word
without clarifier) in 1936, clearly spelled
out in the post you appear to have ... well,
let's just speak plainly, here:

Sticking your head in the sand, ignoring
(or not caring) that the widespread fre-
quent use of the diabetes word without
clarifier causes delusion / confusion /
misinformation, I would characterize that
as a clearcut example of your living in

D-I-A-B-E-T-E-S D-E-N-I-A-L

My previous post, 45 others are trying to
escape, many more (documented elsewhere)
are trying to escape, I first tried to escape
in 2010, but until the new words I created
put an end to the diabetes confusion, we're
all adversely impacted by that ancient
confusion burden.

You can try to escape, too, and join me in
lobbying for new clarifying names, if only
I can find the right words to get you to
try to escape, too.

Still trying,
Pro-Humanist FREELOVER
(outstanding) http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[AntiPro&T1DM]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> You can try to escape, too

This is a waste of time for me. I prefer to leave disease names to medical
professionals. Whatever the ADA does if fine with me.

MHD has no control/voting rights for DM name changes.

You jumped on the wrong bus.

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 3:05:42 PM UTC-6,
APT wrote:

> Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote [a reply to APT,
> part of one sentence referenced by APT in his
> reply]:

> > You can try to escape, too

> This is a waste of time for me. I prefer to
> leave disease names to medical professionals.
> Whatever the ADA does if fine with me.
>
> MHD has no control/voting rights for DM name
> changes.
>
> You jumped on the wrong bus.

Well, the challenge, increasing the usage
of the new names I created in 2010, join-
ing the new names which are added every
month to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary
(and added from time-to-time in every ...

... other dictionary which updates their
names), example appearing at the end of
this reply.

MHD is one bus. Other buses? Well, I did
post once to the Rename Diabetes? article,
and I used to post in other diabetes news-
groups, and have experimented with change.org
and facebook, but haven't spent all that
much energy outside of MHD the past few
years.

After all, I'm only one person. If you
have suggestions for other buses I might
try my new names on, feel free to advise
me about that.

Of course, my source article, Diabetes
Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst, I've
referenced that elsewhere on the buses
mentioned above.

My challenge is made more difficult by
my advocacy of 1) promoting new names
accompanied by 2) ceasing the use of
the diabetes and diabetic words, a long
list of words.

As difficult as "1" is, "2" is even
harder, but won't transpire unless or
until I've had some success with "1".

You could help by stopping attacking
the new names, and joining the efforts
to escape the diabetes diabetic depen-
dence on ancient outdated confusing
nomenclature.

Other new name advocates (who are try-
ing to escape the above) could help
by realizing diabetes diabetic words
should die, and new names should be
free of those words.

New Words Example (September, 2017):
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/new-words-in-the-dictionary-sep-2017

Welcome to the New Words

We've expanded the dictionary with
more than 250 words and definitions.

We've been at it again: the Merriam-
Webster.com dictionary has gotten
bigger, this time by over 250 new
words and definitions.

These terms have shown themselves
to be fully established members of
the language, some after hanging
about on the fringes for decades,
and others after proving themselves
too useful to ignore in relatively
short order.

All have demonstrated significant
use in a variety of sources, making
them words our readers expect to
find in the dictionary.

As always, the expansion of the
dictionary mirrors the expansion
of the language, and reaches into
all the various cubbies and corners
of the lexicon.

...

- - - end excerpt - - -

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER, supporter of
superior new clarifying names for all
of the confusing misleading diabetes
and diabetic words and phrases ever
since I created my initial proposal ...

... for that on May 17, 2010, a day
prior to my daughter's 19th birthday;
she was born May 18, 1991, 12 weeks
before her due date: http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

* * * * * * * * * * * *

[AntiPro&T1DM]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> Well, the challenge, increasing the usage of the new names

You are missing the point. Your new names must be used by Doctors first.
Until your Doctor uses these terms, nothing will happen. You are talking to
a brick wall.

We DMs on MHD use the terms our Doctors use to communicate with our
Doctors. We are not paying you to communicate with our Doctors.

You're on a dead-end street until you get Doctors to use your terms.

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 12:33:57 PM UTC-6, APT wrote:

> Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote [a 62 line post,
not including the 9 line sig, APT including
part of the 1st 2 lines in his reply, but he
1) failed to comment to stopping his attack
on new names, and 2) only mentioned 1 other
bus he suggested as the first other bus I
address]:

> > Well, the challenge, increasing the usage of the new names

> You are missing the point. Your new names must be used by Doctors first.
> Until your Doctor uses these terms, nothing will happen. You are talking to
> a brick wall.

Well, it will take a lot of work, as my
website would require formatting the print
output page-by-page and presenting that
to my endocrinologist when I visit him
in December. Oh well, nothing ventured ...

... nothing gained, so I'll start working
on that on my 2 days off next week.

> We DMs on MHD use the terms our Doctors use to communicate with our
> Doctors. We are not paying you to communicate with our Doctors.
>
> You're on a dead-end street until you get Doctors to use your terms.

Well, doctors, that's one bus. Do you
have any suggestion for other buses,
or do you think the above (getting one
doctor to read my Diabetes Bubble /
Diabetes Bubble Burst article) is the
first step (with no others).

Of course, MHD, that's a habit that
I will continue, but other buses, I
might also try venturing there if
you care to provide any suggestions
for other buses I can promote my new
name ideas on.

= = =
Pro-Humanist FREELOVER, name-change advocate
proposing superior new clarifying names for
all diabetes & diabetic terms (superlative
article): http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm
= = =

[AntiPro&T1DM]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> Do you have any suggestion for other buses

Until Doctors use your terminology, you will be ignored. You are the only
person using your terminology. Others pay lip service to you, but have not
used your terminology. That should tell you something.

Your drum beating falls on deaf ears here on MHD.