How about calling a Meteor.Collection manager a "connection"?

[Andrew Wilcox]

Back when I was reading the Meteor documentation the first time, I didn't understand what the "manager" argument to Meteor.Collection was, or that it was the object returned by Meteor.connect that could be passed as a "manager" to the collection constructor.

It would have been immediately clear to me if Meteor.Collection took a "connection" argument, and Meteor.connect returned a connection.

[Avital Oliver]

I've also been confused by the name "manager" before...

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Wilcox <andrew...@gmail.com> wrote:

Back when I was reading the Meteor documentation the first time, I didn't understand what the "manager" argument to Meteor.Collection was, or that it was the object returned by Meteor.connect that could be passed as a "manager" to the collection constructor.

It would have been immediately clear to me if Meteor.Collection took a "connection" argument, and Meteor.connect returned a connection.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "meteor-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to meteor-core...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to meteo...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/meteor-core?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.