Hi Derek: I think that Mann’s statement was a combination of both. He genuinely liked Lanza and could have (and should have) made a much better job of directing had he not fallen in love and been totally smitten by Sarita Montiel.
Young Mike: Here in Korea, PDP and LCD are two quite different beasts, and from what I've seen in exhausting trips to Busan electronic stores, the former is definitely easier on the eye than the latter!
And now shall we get back to Serenade? :)
The much anticipated DVD of Serenade has finally arrived and, overall, I am pleased with it, but how they can claim it’s a remastered edition is beyond comprehension. The most important part, the sound, is really quite good (strangely wobbly high C, though, in the restaurant scene) but the colour in the picture varies quite a bit from scene to scene E.G. very red in the My Destiny sequence. There is also considerable grain when viewed on our 46inch plasma, a lot of it is no doubt due to having blown up the ratio from the original 1.66:1 to 1:85.1
I guess we must be grateful that at last the film is available on DVD even if it is under false pretences.
I have been reading the Serenade script (courtesy of our Derek) and find it totally fascinating. What a film this could have turned out with a little more care and concentration on Mann’s part and closer adherence to the script.
In the script the film begins with a flashback of the burned out Damon in Mexico. It would have made a perfect start and with a little more elaboration on Damon’s infatuation with Kendall the whole thing would have made more sense. They should also have retained the scene (153) between Damon and Kendall in the dressing room, which preceded the meeting between Kendall and Winthrop in the lobby at the Arlesiana performance and possibly the following scenes (154 –155) which were omitted.
I also think that the choice of some of the camera angles was unfortunate. You don’t place a 5’7’ person who also happens to be the leading actor next to the 6’4” Vincent Price.
Nor do you film in close up, lying on his side in bed, someone that weighs over a hundred kilos. Mann should also have asked for less grimacing in places such as at the table in the scene with Tonio (43) whe Damon wants to quit, and, again, towards the end of scene (57) when Kendall tells Damon that she didn’t ask the sculptor whether he is in love with her. Mind you, Lanza has some excellent moments in both of these scenes and he is very good for the major part of the film.
And lastly, all of the music, including the entire Otello duet and the scene where he sings My Destiny with orchestra, should have been retained. Cutting the film down to 121 minutes was a mistake.
Hi Derek: I watched Serenade in it’s entirety last night and regardless of plot faults, grainy picture or changing colour, all I can tell you is that I was totally blown away by Lanza’s singing.
The man was a musical phenomenon and in Serenade he is vocally outstanding. Lanza is in spectacular voice for the most part, with a column of sound even throughout it’s entire range, solid as a rock, yet with such dynamics to enable him to shift from the dramatic intensity of Otello to the delicate handling of Schubert’s Ave Maria, all the while retaining the magnificent colouring of the voice and it’s brilliant top. I know of no other tenor that combines all this attributes along with such complete involvement and total identification with the music, the plot and the character. Add to this a large a dose of charisma, stage presence and good looks and you have what in operatic circles is commonly know as a stage animal, or a complete singing actor.
There’s no question that in 1955 Lanza was more than ever ready for the operatic stage, and had he been able to make the move at that particular point I have not the slightest doubt that he would have reigned supreme as the ultimate spinto.
Lanza is magnificent in the Otello Monologue and the snippet of the duet from the same opera. He is vocally perfect and fantastic in his total understanding the role.
Furthermore, that a voice that size could handle the difficult tessitura of Di Rigori Armato and deliver ringing B flats and B natural with extreme ease is in itself a miracle.
By this stage Lanza was also perfectly suited to such operas as Fedora, Trovatore, L’Africana, and Turandot. Amor ti vieta and O Paradiso are simply stunning and Nessun dorma, including the final B natural, has never sounded better. Even Di Quella Pira has it’s moments, and in view of the overall sound being produced one can easily overlook the fact that that two high Cs could have been better.
There are outstanding moments in other Lanza films, such as the Vesti La Giubba in The Great Caruso, Addio alla Madre in Because You’re Mine, and the operatic excerpts in For the First Time, but for a voice at the peak of it’s powers Serenade can hardly be bettered.
It’s a film that should be seen and heard by the doubting Thomases, providing, that is, they have sufficient knowledge of the operatic voice and what constitutes an opera singer.
Ciao Derek: I think that taking Lanza for granted is
probably something we all subconsciously do from time to time. That’s why I tend
to not listen to his recordings or view his films too frequently. When I do, the result is almost akin to rediscovering
him again and be totally mesmerised by his towering talent.
Ciao Derek: Those fixated on the Coke days voice fail to understand that the singing during this period was mostly totally unrestrained, stylistically poor and technically uneven, with some abominable orchestrations and conducting to boot. The voice itself, with few exceptions, was consistently brilliant but, particularly in the songs, Lanza was using a more open tone and letting the voice rip with complete abandon, throwing caution to the wind.
Both the voice and the singer in Serenade are a totally different matter. The voice, while retaining its brilliant colouring, is darker, but the singer is stylistically and technically miles ahead from the Coke days. It’s obvious that he had worked seriously on the music with the great coach, Giacomo Spadoni and that he benefited greatly from Ray Heindorf superior conducting.
The overall result from someone that had been inactive for the best part of three years is close to miraculous, with a towering Lanza both vocally and interpretively.
Roger Brown, wrote in the September 29, 1956, edition of Saturday Review,
“The voice of Mario Lanza yearns towards the operatic stage and I dare predict it will carry him there.”
Had fate been kinder, Brown’s prophecy might well have become a reality. However, I can think of no greater Operatic Testament from Lanza than his outstanding singing in Serenade.
Had more of this sort of singing and less of the Coke one been peddled by his recording company we may encounter less resistance when discussing Lanza with the more enlightened opera connoisseurs.
I guess one can dream……..
Hi Derek: Saying goodbye to films after Serenade would certainly have been ideal. But, again, apart from the disastrous situation of his finances( most of the earnings from Serenade had gone on the purchase of the Bel Air home and he still had unpaid taxes) there was a question of confidence. This was no longer the self -assured man of merely 4 years earlier. Behind the façade and the bravado was a man whose psyche and self- esteem had suffered an almost fatal blow.
To imagine that in that particular frame of mind he could have attempted a return to opera is, in my mind, totally inconceivable.
I do believe, though, that had he been able to get his health in order and work seriously with someone like Peter Herman Adler or Tullio Serafin or Oliviero De Fabritis, (the latter, following Tebaldi’s instigation, was interested in working with him) it could well have happened in the 60s.
Of course, this latest of mine will do nothing to change the
mind of those that are forever accusing us of dreaming.Frankly, they would be better
off keeping totally silent since their
understanding of operatic matters and operatic singing is completely non existent.
But then again-ignorance is bliss!