Many hours pass.
Another person who believes it to be their property decides to claim
ownership after seeing it on the table, but when it was explained how
it was found a load of abuse was thrown.. It was explained politely by
2 members but they were ignored, I was one of them explaining how it
was found. Keeping in mind it was explained how it was found, purely
to keep peace and shed light on how it came into someone elses hands
and that it was not of theft.
Some snippets included, ' you're stealing my shit', 'why don't you
fight me for it', 'dipshit, and ' grow another 2 inches '.
It was completely uncalled for and left a few of us really unimpressed.
I sincerely hope Sam learns to be a bit more congruent with /this/ community. :(
--
>
++++++++++[>+>+++>++
+++++>++++++++++<<<<
-]>>>+++++++.>++++++
+++++.+++..---------
.++++++++++.<<+++.<.
No?
Fair game, afaik. Update me if I'm wrong here.
b
The "fair game" rule doesn't override the unwritten "don't be a dick" rule.
--
Russ Garrett
ru...@garrett.co.uk
Though frankly merging the donations system so closely with the lost &
found, this was bound to happen. Especially since actual donations get
readily and routinely left in the 3-week box as well.
Let's just move the 3-week box physically away from the 2 and 1 week boxes.
Proposal:
Attatch to the front of the boxes some proper drawer label holders, EG:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/251009124126
The "lost and found" label is on RED and notes that the contents will be
moved to the 2-week disposal box every sunday. This doesn't help much in
cases where something is lost or forgotten early on a sunday, but one
improvement at a time. Plus if there's no risk of your stuff being
permenantly lost, where's the motivation in actually looking after your
stuff? :P
The other two boxes get labels stating "Hackspace item donations;
X-weeks to disposal" on green.
Every sunday the Lost & found box gets moved down to the general box
location, the labels get swapped along and the former 1-week box gets
emptied and becomes the new Lost & Found for the week.
Not perfect, but seems it would be an improvement in preventing
donations merging with lost items initially, as well as being tidier and
less work in the long run (not having to empty the contents of one box
into the next, possibly damaging otherwise useful parts).
~ Sci
With the obvious assumption of excellence from all involved, taking
into account the mistakes people make in a shared workshop. Fair game
means that if something is left out by accident, you shouldn't start a
fight if the rightful owner asks for it back. On the other hand, if
something has already been hacked because you left it out a week ago,
you may be entitled to a hug, but not a replacement.
We still don't know enough detail about last night to do anything more
than speculate on the list, so I suggest we all continue to assume
good faith for now.
Mark
If someone had something go into a bin without them realising / paying
attention. And they then find it, intact, it feels like they should
have the right to rescue it.
Sure if it's already been hacked into something else; then they have
to accept the consequences of their inattention. But if it's just a
that someone else has seen it and thought "I'll have that", I'd think
that it's a bit *officious* to insist that the original owner has
forfeited it. "Be excellent" would surely give the original owner a
final chance to reclaim it.
Having said that, there's no excuse for aggression or threatening
behaviour. Do we need some kind of mediation / public "trail" or
meeting where people should be asked to come and apologise for bad
behaviour?
phil
(If you witnessed the debate Morris mentions I'd very much appreciate if you would extend this invitation to the parties involved.)
m.
That's a bad distinction - for example my laptop would end up in the 3
week box if I had wandered to get lunch based on that, gicn the bottom
is falling off, but it's perfectly usable.
Kimball
Marking things with your name/email (a "Sharpie" or similar felt marker is
good for this) will normally ensure that enquiries are made before
mangling/disposal.
> One headache of course is that the standard "Do Not Hack" stickers are
> too large to affix to smaller projects, and not everyone might have
> the hardware/mindset to scan QR codes affixed to smaller stuff. Maybe
> having a standard "Do not hack" and/or "In use/owned by someone"
> symbols for smaller projects might be worthwhile?
Phil
--
" et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos. "