a LoCCan3 discussion platform?

[tijlan]

Apparently some people have been giving much thought to the
potentiality of a next-generation logical language, which include
myself even though I haven't taken part in the recent LoCCan3
conversation. The concept has at least intellectual merits and may
deserve detailed examination & organization. That's perhaps beyond the
scope of this mailing list, and the process might benefit from inputs
from different existing conlang (& natlang) communities.

Is there a dedicated platform for such a process? Would you be
interested in having one?

[Gleki Arxokuna]

 I'm not interested. It will definitely split Loccan-land once again.

Look what happened to Logland. They had magazines. But we don't discuss them cuz we mostly can't even read them.

It's more than easy to convert loglandic texts to lojban, import them into lojban.org wiki.

Are we too lazy?

We are the biggest logical and language semantic community in the world. Others either have useless theories that can't be turned into real language

or just don't have any disussions of logic and semantic (like Esperantujo).

We set rules, not Ithkuilists or anybody else. Just because we simply outnumber them.

If some conlanger, especially loglanger is not familiar with Lojban, it's eir problem.

.e'u casnu lo se zbasu bangu bau lo jbobau po'o

[Gleki Arxokuna]

Oh. I just wanna invite everyone to this mailing list, not divert it from here. Ithkuil lovers, Esperanto speakers, Na'vi warriors, Klingon-speaking researchers of the universe 

and many more.

You are welcome here!

[And Rosta]

Gleki Arxokuna, On 13/07/2012 12:03:

> On Friday, July 13, 2012 1:54:09 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote:
> Apparently some people have been giving much thought to the
> potentiality of a next-generation logical language, which include
> myself even though I haven't taken part in the recent LoCCan3
> conversation. The concept has at least intellectual merits and may
> deserve detailed examination & organization. That's perhaps beyond the
> scope of this mailing list, and the process might benefit from inputs
> from different existing conlang (& natlang) communities.
>
> Is there a dedicated platform for such a process? Would you be
> interested in having one?

There's the dormant jbo...@yahoogroups.com, which would be appropriate if this next generation language comes under the umbrella of the Loglan project, and the dormant enge...@yahoogroups.com, for engelang discussion in general. (Both lists are old, still functional, and owned by me.) There's so much overlap between folk interested in engelangs and folk interested in loglangs, that there wouldn't seem to be much point in starting a new loglang list.

> Oh. I just wanna invite everyone to this mailing list, not divert it
> from here. Ithkuil lovers, Esperanto speakers, Na'vi warriors,
> Klingon-speaking researchers of the universe

That is Conlang List, the forum for discussion of all sorts of invented language (except for the sociopolitical aspect of international auxiliary languages).

--And.

[Gleki Arxokuna]

Yes. which actually poses no interest for me if you wanna create naturalistic only lang. 

And there is nice conlangery.com podcast.

Lojban can be naturalistic too... but without any external help.

But I'm sure that Ithkuil can be discussed here too. There are not so many places where researchers can play with semantics and be creators at the same time. We must compare ithkuil's solutions with realisations in Lojban all the time, though. But non-artlangs and non-loglangs isn't worth discussing in most cases.

--And.