Is it possible to use be directly followed by bei, indicating that the sumti followed by be is omitted(=zo'e)? I know it is possible to do the same with "be fi", but I think it sounds better. I think it should be possible since the bei makes it obvious that the one between be and bai was elided... However, no of the parsers I tried accepted this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Is it possible to use be directly followed by bei, indicating that the sumti followed by be is omitted(=zo'e)? I know it is possible to do the same with "be fi", but I think it sounds better. I think it should be possible since the bei makes it obvious that the one between be and bai was elided... However, no of the parsers I tried accepted this.