Template Statefulness between 2.3 and 2.4-M1

[Antonio Salazar Cardozo]

Hello all,

We have a path of our app that is currently marked fully stateless, but goes through the usual Lift templating pipeline (template on disk + desginer-friendly snippet invocations). This worked fine in 2.3, but hitting it in 2.4-M1 caused a StateInStateless exception. Is this normal/expected?

I know that's not terribly detailed, I'm working on isolating which particular part is causing it, but the stack trace just points directly to processTemplate in LiftSession (where the function map is updated) so that's my initial suspicion.

Thanks,

Antonio

[David Pollak]

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Antonio Salazar Cardozo <savedf...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello all,

We have a path of our app that is currently marked fully stateless, but goes through the usual Lift templating pipeline (template on disk + desginer-friendly snippet invocations). This worked fine in 2.3, but hitting it in 2.4-M1 caused a StateInStateless exception. Is this normal/expected?

It's a bug.  Please open a ticket and I'll get it fixed ASAP.  This might be a reason to spin a 2.4.1-M1 as all of statelessness is broken.
 

I know that's not terribly detailed, I'm working on isolating which particular part is causing it, but the stack trace just points directly to processTemplate in LiftSession (where the function map is updated) so that's my initial suspicion.

Thanks,

Antonio

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/liftweb/-/k3Kt-pxeS4wJ.
To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net

Simply Lift http://simply.liftweb.net
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Blog: http://goodstuff.im

[Antonio Salazar Cardozo]

Filed at https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1037-statelessness-is-broken-in-2-4-m1

Sorry for not catching this during the pre-M1 phase, we missed this particular flow in our internal testing.
Thanks,

-- 
Antonio Salazar Cardozo

[David Pollak]

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Antonio Salazar Cardozo <savedf...@gmail.com> wrote:

Filed at https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1037-statelessness-is-broken-in-2-4-m1

Sorry for not catching this during the pre-M1 phase, we missed this particular flow in our internal testing.

Okay... the patch is in master.  Please retest (either on a locally built version or wait 2 hours for Jenkins to do a full build).

If the fix works, we'll spin a 2.4.1-M1

 

[Antonio Salazar Cardozo]

Cool. We'll wait a couple of hours and get back to you as soon as we've tested.

Thanks,

Antonio

[David Pollak]

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Antonio Salazar Cardozo <savedf...@gmail.com> wrote:

Cool. We'll wait a couple of hours and get back to you as soon as we've tested.

Great.

For the rest of the Lift list... this is what Antonio's team has built:
http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/08/openstudy-wants-to-turn-the-world-into-one-big-study-group/

The video is pretty cool!
 

Thanks,

Antonio

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/liftweb/-/ciaIV24uqwkJ.

To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

[Jeppe Nejsum Madsen]

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:50 PM, David Pollak
<feeder.of...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Antonio Salazar Cardozo
> <savedf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Filed
>> at https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1037-statelessness-is-broken-in-2-4-m1
>>
>> Sorry for not catching this during the pre-M1 phase, we missed this
>> particular flow in our internal testing.
>
> Okay... the patch is in master.  Please retest (either on a locally built
> version or wait 2 hours for Jenkins to do a full build).
>
> If the fix works, we'll spin a 2.4.1-M1

Shouldn't that be a 2.4-M2?

/Jeppe

[David Pollak]

Either way works for me.
 

/Jeppe

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

[Antonio Salazar Cardozo]

Just tested it and things seem to be running smoothly! Thanks for the quick turnaround, and for the kind words.

Antonio

[David Pollak]

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Antonio Salazar Cardozo <savedf...@gmail.com> wrote:

Just tested it and things seem to be running smoothly!

Cool.  I'll ask Indrajit to spin 2.4-M2
 

Thanks for the quick turnaround, and for the kind words.

You're welcome... and thanks for being crazy enough to risk your start-up on Lift.
 

Antonio

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/liftweb/-/YcOOw0uZ41YJ.

To post to this group, send email to lif...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.