Hi Veera,
I’d be very skeptical of those enrichment results for a couple reasons:
1) h2=.008 with se=.010 is non-significant. It’s hard to say a particular annotation is enriched for heritability if there’s not overall heritability. The original partitioned heritability paper restricted to a minimum z score of 7 (p=1e-12) for heritability before attempting partitioning. We tend to be somewhat more lenient then that, but partitioning non-significant heritability certainly isn’t recommended.
2) Nominal significance of p=.01-.05 isn’t terribly surprising given multiple testing of e.g. 24 main annotations in the baseline model. With just those main annotations (i.e. ignoring their border regions) that means a bonferroni-corrected significance threshold of p=.002.
3) Since the enrichment calculation involves the proportion of heritability it requires division by the total heritability, and h2=0.008 is a very small denominator to have in that calculation. The resulting estimate is generally going to be very unstable, which explains your very large enrichment values; presumably those large estimates also have large SEs that reflect this instability.
Cheers,
Raymond