...is there is such a thing? it can be ever possible?
I'm working with other 5 people on the same document (paper), and we
are debating whether it is good to use Word or LaTeX. I'm going for
LaTeX, but there are other people that are *strongly* pushing for
Word.
We all agreed that:
1) We need to work on the same document: we don't want to convert to
another format then put back the modifications (i.e. latex2rtf is not
practical: spoils all the references/formula/figures/etc, then putting
back the modifications is not easy)
2) With word, we can just send by email the updated file to all the
people, while with latex sources we need to share the whole directory,
which is not practical. Few of them don't have any IT background, and
I would like to keep things as easy as possible. We already discarded
the option of using pdf files, and let the no-LaTeX people just
commenting the pdf.
What I'm looking for is some sort of web-based document manager (even
google documents based) that allows to "compile" online the LaTeX. Or,
maybe a sort of MS Word plugin that makes possible to work with LaTeX
without messing up the structure of the document (for example Word
with HTML can do very nasty things, I suspect it can go nasty with
LaTeX as well). I'm not really confident with MS stuff, so I don't
know where to start actually!
And I should have added that if the document contains math or giant complex tables, it becomes 2-3 orders of magnitude harder to transform to LaTeX. It is technically possible, just difficult.
///Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LaTeX Users Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to latexus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to latexusersgro...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/latexusersgroup?hl=en.
> What I'm looking for is some sort of web-based document manager (even
> google documents based) that allows to "compile" online the LaTeX. Or,
You can export to XML (and/or maybe TeX) from many CMS with some
strict textual syntax (like wiki, textile, markupdown, etc.)
> However, i dont agree with them after enjoying Latex.
>
> How to justify that Latex is superior than word and power point?
>
Don't try to convince people that are not ready to listen to you or
won't ever change their habits.
For others, your LaTeX pcaghige may be your ambassador... Another
example : a friend of mine try to learn LaTeX after spenting some
times in order to write a letter (he has te place elements) and a just
put the same text in a text file with some minimal taging (letter
class) and the result was far superior.
Hi Peter,
I too had a discussion with my colleagues about LaTex and MS Word. I could not convince those who are using Word and Power point.
I am being told that why are you taking pain in using Latex since everything is possible in word itself.
However, i dont agree with them after enjoying Latex.
How to justify that Latex is superior than word and power point?
>>
>> I am being told that why are you taking pain in using Latex since
>> everything is possible in word itself.
>
> Don't even try to answer. They cannot see the productivity gain, and will
> not like having it pointed out to them.
>
> Almost everything is possible in Word, but sometimes it takes a lot of pain
> and time.
>
>>
>> However, i dont agree with them after enjoying Latex.
>> How to justify that Latex is superior than word and power point?
>
> It depends what you mean by "superior". LaTeX produces better typeset
> output, and it can be automated much more easily than Word, but the fact
> that after 25 years there is no synchronous typographic interface of the
> same quality as Word is disappointing.
>
Maybe because most of us (and specially all capable people) are not
fan of those kind of interfaces ? :-) XML addicts that prefer those
kind of interface for office works are OpenOffice-likes users... But
how many TeXers use and improve rare (commercial) attempts ?
> Perhaps show them BaKoMaTeX? Don't show them LyX: the ERT will break them up
> :-)
>
LyX is still a toy for be-semantic people ; it's closer to some XML
visual editors, it's not a true word-processor like (but it may be
helpful and very useful when switching to LaTeX)
> The point about Word users is that their documents are not important in the
> long term, either to them or to their employer. It's not worth it to change
> to LaTeX (or XML, or anything else) — if it was, they would already have
> made the change.
>
Of course, Word here is an instance of "closed formats" : they can
only serve for temporary/ephemera production... Or their users become
slaves of some companies like those oblige to always follow MS in
order to keep reading their documents :-S
First: the power of habits and why things are difficult to change.
most human feel comfortable with familiar stuff even if it's a pain
(something August Dvorak lean)
Second (related): word processors (like Word) and text-typography
processors (like *TeX) use different "approaches". The first are
wysiwy-(get and try to do it by yourself) way whereas the other let
you describe/say what you mean and an automated program will give you
the result according to strict rules you don't have to care about
yourself. The second case users are often trained or involved in
semantic...
Maybe because most of us (and specially all capable people) are not
fan of those kind of interfaces ? :-)
XML addicts that prefer those
kind of interface for office works are OpenOffice-likes users... But
how many TeXers use and improve rare (commercial) attempts ?
LyX is still a toy for be-semantic people ; it's closer to some XMLvisual editors, it's not a true word-processor like (but it may be
helpful and very useful when switching to LaTeX)
Of course, Word here is an instance of "closed formats" : they canonly serve for temporary/ephemera production... Or their users become
slaves of some companies like those oblige to always follow MS in
order to keep reading their documents :-S
> An example. As teacher, my collegua and I have to prepare paper
> quizzes and their results. Guess what? They have to maintain two
> versoin (two times work) while I use a single .tex file (one
> compiilaton without the results, a parameter to change and another
> compilation with the results,.. Finaly one is trying to mimic that
> with Access + VBA stuffs)
>
Off-topic, but could you please explain the parameter to allow for
conditional compilation; thanks.
\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{exam} %
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Teacher%27s_Corner
%\usepackage...
%# exam parameters
%## answers
\printanswers % If you want to print answers (class option: answers),
i.e. shows "solution/solutionorlines/solutionordottedlines"
environments, or emphasis CorrectChoice commands.
%\noprintanswers % If you don't want to print answers
%## scores
%\addpoints % if you want to count the points
\noaddpoints % if you don't want to count the points
%# exam formating
%## questions
\qformat{\textbf{Question \thequestion}\quad(\thepoints)\hfill} %
%\qformat{Question \thequestion\dotfill \emph{\totalpoints\ points}} %
%\qformat{Question \thequestion: \thequestiontitle\dotfill\thepoints}
% une \titledquestion{some title}[points] instead of \question[points]
%## answers
%### long texts : environments "solution/solutionorlines/solutionordottedlines"
\framedsolutions % solution environment uses \fbox (defaut).
%\shadedsolutions % Solution environment uses \colorbox (requiers
"color" package) with gray background.
%\definecolor{SolutionColor}{rgb}{0.8,0.9,1} % light blue
\renewcommand{\solutiontitle}{\noindent\textbf{Solution:}\par\noindent}
% Changes the title of the solution environment
%### short texts : commands CorrectChoice/correctchoice/answerline
\CorrectChoiceEmphasis{\bfseries} % defaut
%\CorrectChoiceEmphasis{\color{red}} % with color package
%\CorrectChoiceEmphasis{\color{red}\bfseries} % with color package
%## points
%### apparence of the command \half
%\usehorizontalhalf % \frac{1}{2}
%\useslantedhalf % (defaut)
%### surrounding the points
%\bracketedpoints % brackets instead of parenthesis;
\nobracketedpoints will back to defaut
%\boxedpoints % enclosed in boxes instead of parenthesis;
\noboxedpoints will returns to defaut
%### where the points are printed
%\pointsinmargin % to print the points in the left margin;
\nopointsinmargin will revert
%\pointsinrightmargin % to print the points in the right margin;
\nopointsinrightmargin will revert
%### total points formating
%\totalformat{Question \thequestion: \totalpoints} %
%\totalformat{\fbox{Total: \totalpoints}} %
%### bonus total points formating
%\bonustotalformat{Question \thequestion: \totalbonuspoints} %
%\bonustotalformat{\fbox{Total: \totalbonuspoints}} %
%## others
\begin{document}
...
\end{document}
That's from my document template (i removed packages calls to short
the message)
When my document is ready, i compile a first pdf file with
\noprintanswers then a second one with \printanswers
2011/10/25 Russell Friesenhahn :
> Gildas,
>
> Not off-topic! Would you please provide an example of this? My fiancee is
> a teacher and may find this useful.
>
> Thanks,
> Russell
>
She may also take a loot at probsoln or mathexm and many others i haven't try :)
>> We all agreed that:
>> 2) With word, we can just send by email the updated file to all the
>> people, while with latex sources we need to share the whole directory,
>> which is not practical. Few of them don't have any IT background, and
>> I would like to keep things as easy as possible. We already discarded
>> the option of using pdf files, and let the no-LaTeX people just
>> commenting the pdf.
>>
>
> Perhaps you could send a pdf to view and the latex source for
> particular content within the plain-text e-mail message. So if
> collaboration is required for content in chapter 1, this file would be
> sent in the body of the message (e.g. the bottom). Recipients are
> asked to review the pdf and make changes to the source in the e-mail
> text body. Then the command terminal utility 'diff' is used to review
> changes. You would become a de facto editor, but have control over
> final document style. Some recipients may become intrigued that plain
> text commands in an e-mail message can be used to create high quality
> pdf documents...
>
Very good... People will have less resistance to use mail than a text
editor, but some of them will put HTML inside the messages... Anyway,
they will adhere if they are not told they are using LaTeX (they have
been told it's difficult or evil)
>>
> Off-topic, but could you please explain the parameter to allow for
> conditional compilation; thanks.
>
I use LyX to work with LaTeX documents. LyX recently introduced the
term "branch" to describe a conditionally included category of text,
like "answers" to test questions an so forth. You can create several
branches in a document, and activate or de-activate them at will.
In raw LaTex, that can be done with the ifthen package, but I have
never fiddled with it very much. Actually, I tried it and could not
make it work, which I gather is a common first-timer experience.
But you can Google "LaTeX ifthen" and see plenty of examples, such as
http://www.devdaily.com/blog/post/latex/two-simple-examples-using-latex-ifthen-package
You will also see that the "ifthen" package is becoming a bit old, and
newer support is in the etoolbox package.
pj
--
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
University of Kansas
> Off-topic, but could you please explain the parameter to allow forI use LyX to work with LaTeX documents. LyX recently introduced the
> conditional compilation; thanks.
>
term "branch" to describe a conditionally included category of text,
like "answers" to test questions an so forth. You can create several
branches in a document, and activate or de-activate them at will.
In raw LaTex, that can be done with the ifthen package, but I have
never fiddled with it very much. Actually, I tried it and could not
make it work, which I gather is a common first-timer experience.
> In raw LaTex, that can be done with the ifthen package, but I have
> never fiddled with it very much. Actually, I tried it and could not
> make it work, which I gather is a common first-timer experience.
>
I use the ifthen package too, but only for settings of packages i may
comment later (so i don't have to worry about those additional lines)
or my correspondent may not have, or tweaking some other in some
particular ways according to the compilation (specially PDF stuff
depending on the use of latex or pdflatex command)
> But you can Google "LaTeX ifthen" and see plenty of examples, such as
>
> http://www.devdaily.com/blog/post/latex/two-simple-examples-using-latex-ifthen-package
>
> You will also see that the "ifthen" package is becoming a bit old, and
> newer support is in the etoolbox package.
>
I didn't know this new one either.
In TeXing world, we're always learning :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LaTeX Users Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to latexus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to latexusersgro...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/latexusersgroup?hl=en.