Support for Bluestork, Hathor, Beez in J 3

[Viet Vu]

Hi,

How will Bluestork, Hathor, Beez are supported in upcoming version 3.0? Not sure how will they work when Strapped is integrated?

Just want to know about this as I could not find any related information else where.

Thanks

[Michael Babker]

I'm not sure what the stance is at this time.  Theoretically, all of the templates could be updated to use the new markup.  Or, they could all be dropped as well.  I thought I saw somewhere that Angie was working on a version of Beez to be compatible with Bootstrap, but I could be wrong there too.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/sWi_nNp0c6YJ.
To post to this group, send an email to joomla-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to joomla-dev-cm...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.

[elin]

Yes she has been. But as always it all depends on what is ready when the time comes.

Elin

On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 4:33:58 PM UTC-4, Michael Babker wrote:

I'm not sure what the stance is at this time.  Theoretically, all of the templates could be updated to use the new markup.  Or, they could all be dropped as well.  I thought I saw somewhere that Angie was working on a version of Beez to be compatible with Bootstrap, but I could be wrong there too.

From: Viet Vu <vie...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:11 AM
To: <joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [jcms] Support for Bluestork, Hathor, Beez in J 3

Hi,

How will Bluestork, Hathor, Beez are supported in upcoming version 3.0? Not sure how will they work when Strapped is integrated?

Just want to know about this as I could not find any related information else where.

Thanks

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/sWi_nNp0c6YJ.

To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

[Angie Radtke]

Hi together,

I think most of you know that I'm not the best friend of bootstrap.
So maybe some of you remember the discussion we had in the UX Forum.
My opion didn't change much, but I see that bootstrap has some nice
looking styles and it looks easy for people who are not so familar with
all the CSS stuff.


So what I did the last days:

1. First I took alook at that static page:
http://www.kyleledbetter.com/j3ux/site/
It is looking nice but I think the code can be optimized a lot.
I took a look at the source code and saw a lot of nested divs. I think
this isn't optimal.
On the other hand the document hasn't got a correct semantic
structure and don't linearize correct.

So I try to change that (only 2 hours; only on the startscreen)
The result you can see here: http://der-auftritt.de/kunden/bootstrap/

2. This morning I spent few hours to bootstrap the Beez5-Template
Result beez.der-auftritt.de

Here I noticed two big issue :

a) I add the span-classes bootstrap needs into the template-overrides of
the frontapge-view, so that we can customize the columncount over the
menuitems.
Bootstrap is working with px for the width. If the screensize changed
media-queries are changing the width.
So good so far.

In the normal Beez-Template we are working with % for the width. The
big advantage of this is that we have good more flexibility with the
column-positioning around the main-content (left, right no-column),
because the width is related to its parentelement. Maybe somebody has an
idea for that.

b) There are no styles for a deep nested navigation, they should be
added in the custom theme.css and that can be much code.
We should take care of the file-size.

Bye Angie