Condsider the following Haskell program (fragment):
f 0 = “zero”
g 0 = “NULL”
f n = “non-zero”
g n = “PRESENT”
This will result in two “Multiple Declaration” errors.
There is a good motivation for this - disallowing such an interleaving
of declarations makes it easy for the compiler to capture a common
typo, namely errors of the following form - here an attempt to define
a single function called myFun.
myFun 0 = “zero”
myfun 1 = “one”
myFun n = “too big!”
However I have use-cases where it would be nice to interleave as per
the first example above - with markedly different function names.
It invokes a large case analysis, where I have other auxiliary functions
associated with each case, but which I’d like to
(1) have at the top-level for testability
(2) keep textually local to the case with which they are associated.
I don’t think there is a language extension to disable the multiple
declaration check - but would such a feature we possible. I’d see it
as one which still performs the check, but issues a warning rather
than an error - particularly if it notices that the interleaved names
are very similar.
Is this a reasonable suggestion, or are there other reasons for not doing
this that I’ve missed?
Maybe there is a better way to satisfy (1) and (2) above?
Regards,
Andrew
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Butterfield Tel:
+353-1-896-2517 Fax:
+353-1-677-2204
Lero@TCD, Head of Foundations & Methods Research Group
School of Computer Science and Statistics,
Room G.39, O'Reilly Institute, Trinity College, University of Dublin
http://www.scss.tcd.ie/Andrew.Butterfield/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskel...@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe