Ole error on Harbour, ok with xHarbour

[Antonio Linares]

A xHarbour user that is migrating to Harbour has reported us this uncompatibility that works fine with xHarbour:

Oevent:CustomProperties:Property("ID") = anyvalue gives the following error

planninghrb.prg(838) Error E0022 Invalid lvalue ':'

He asked us to resend the question to you, thanks

regards

Antonio

[ToninhoFWi]

>>Oevent:CustomProperties:Property("ID") = anyvalue gives the following error

Hi Antonio.

 

Please try: Oevent:CustomProperties:ID = anyvalue

 

 

Regards,

 

Toninho.

 

 

[Antonio Linares]

Toninho,

Forwarded to the user, thanks :-)

regards

Antonio

2013/4/16 ToninhoFWi <tonin...@yahoo.com.br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Harbour Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/harbour-devel/zAwtkXC12Y4/unsubscribe?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to harbour-deve...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com

[Antonio Linares]

Not working (he just tested it)

Antonio

[Pablo Medina]

I understand i am not helping, but ,a similar question was posted more than one year ago, with 0 replies ?

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/harbour-users/FG40LaDq044/2F8KgwgW3RsJ

2013/4/16 Antonio Linares <antonio....@gmail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Harbour Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to harbour-deve...@googlegroups.com.

[Przemyslaw Czerpak]

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Antonio Linares wrote:

Hi,

> A xHarbour user that is migrating to Harbour has reported us this
> uncompatibility that works fine with xHarbour:

He simply does not know what his talking about ;-)

>
> Oevent:CustomProperties:Property("ID") = anyvalue gives the following error
>
> planninghrb.prg(838) Error E0022 Invalid lvalue ':'

Perfect behavior. Just like in Clipper, xBase++ and most of other
compatible dialects with basic syntax verification at compile time.

> He asked us to resend the question to you, thanks

It's wrong group. xHarbour bugs should not be reported here.
If you plan to write to xHarbour list then you can attach
this example:

proc main()
local o := errorNew()
o:cargo( "bla bla bla", "ABC" + date() / .f. ) := 123
? o:cargo
o:cargo( "this is xHarbour bug" ) := "any"
? o:cargo
o:cargo( "becaue", "it", "does", "not", "report" ) := date()
? o:cargo
o:cargo( "compile", "time", "error", "for", "method" ) := time()
? o:cargo
o:cargo( "call used in assigment", ;
"what I reported few times" ) := .t.
? o:cargo
return

Just like the code above it's shows that xHarbour accepts method calls
with any idiotic parameters as lvalue in assignment operations.
Of course all such parameters does not have any meaning and xHarbour
without any errors or warnings generate code like for instance variable
assignment so
o:cargo( "bla bla bla", "ABC" + date() / .f. ) := 123
it's the same as:
o:cargo := 123
and:

Oevent:CustomProperties:Property("ID") = anyvalue

it's the same as:
Oevent:CustomProperties:Property = anyvalue

It's really funny to see such messages about "correct code working
for years".

regards,
Przemek

[Antonio Linares]

Przemek,

many thanks for your clarification and help,

best regards

Antonio

[Juan Gálvez]

Hi Przemek,

I'm happy to see you here again. Your comments are always valuable and
instructive.

Best regards
Juan

El 16/04/2013 23:41, Przemyslaw Czerpak escribi�:

[Antonio Linares]

Solved with this workaround:

oevent:customproperties:_Property("id",CID)

thanks

Antonio

[Juan Francolino]

Hi Antonio,

Thanks Antonio for sharing the solution.

Some people find it hard to be friendly.

Regards,


Juan


El 17/04/2013 11:02 a.m., Antonio Linares escribi�:

> Solved with this workaround:
>
> oevent:customproperties:_Property("id",CID)

> *
> *
> *thanks*
> *
> *
> *Antonio
> *
> El mi�rcoles, 17 de abril de 2013 06:31:24 UTC+2, Antonio Linares escribi�:

>
> Przemek,
>
> many thanks for your clarification and help,
>
> best regards
>
> Antonio
>

> El martes, 16 de abril de 2013 23:41:25 UTC+2, druzus escribi�: