Evidence from the What Works Centre for Wellbeing was instrumental for the HM Treasury’s move to explicitly use wellbeing as a core consideration in appraising and evaluating public policy.
About the research
The move to include wellbeing as one of the fundamentals of evaluating and appraising government policy has been gathering pace in recent years. Eight years ago the government set up the Social Impacts Task Force, consisting of analysts from Whitehall and the devolved government administrations, to develop a cross-departmental approach to understanding social impacts.
The aim of wellbeing analysis is to better demonstrate the full implications of policies – for instance, assessing how different transport options affect community cohesion, or the wellbeing impacts of different forms of flood defence measures. "Subjective wellbeing evidence can challenge decision-makers to think carefully about the full range of an intervention's impacts," states the updated edition of the Green Book.
Research evidence reviews from the What Works Centre for Wellbeing showed that subjective wellbeing measures can pick up meaningful, important and quantifiable differences in wellbeing. This work was central to the increased emphasis on wellbeing in the Green Book guidance, which directly references the research centre.
"The recent update to the Treasury Green Book is a huge leap forward: it sets wellbeing as a priority when it comes to developing and evaluating policy. We're very proud to have helped shape it," says Nancy Hey, Centre Director of the What Works Centre for Wellbeing.
Impacts
Further information
The What Works Centre for Wellbeing gathers evidence and supports the development of high-quality research about the relative impacts on wellbeing of policies and projects, their cost and the quality of the evidence.