Re: [growl-discuss] Memory leak in HardwareGrowler 1.3.2

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Christopher Forsythe

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 8:51:51 AM10/10/12
to growld...@googlegroups.com
We're working on HardwareGrowler 2.0, which is a complete rewrite of HardwareGrowler.I'm pretty confident that you'll be happy with the changes there, but if not let us know once 2.0 is out.

Chris

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Fabrizio La Rosa <fab.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
I noticed a big problem with HardwareGrowler on my iMac and my MacBook Pro; both are running Mac OS X 10.8.2, Growl 2.0 and HardwareGrowler 1.3.2.
The real memory usage of HardwareGrowler was 400 Mb on the iMac and 270 Mb on the MBP, it dropped down to 25 Mb after I have simply quitted & relaunched it.
I keep the iMac always on because I use it at work and I shutdown or reboot the MBP very seldom, I mostly put it in standby mode.
I see that there are other reports about this issue dating back to almost one year ago, so I think that it should be fixed ASAP because it stops me from using this app that would be otherwise very useful.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/growldiscuss/-/rS0uEf47FqMJ.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.



--
Chris Forsythe

Joel Waxman

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 8:52:11 AM10/10/12
to growld...@googlegroups.com
On 10/10/12 6:55 AM, Fabrizio La Rosa wrote:
I noticed a big problem with HardwareGrowler on my iMac and my MacBook Pro; both are running Mac OS X 10.8.2, Growl 2.0 and HardwareGrowler 1.3.2.
The real memory usage of HardwareGrowler was 400 Mb on the iMac and 270 Mb on the MBP, it dropped down to 25 Mb after I have simply quitted & relaunched it.
I keep the iMac always on because I use it at work and I shutdown or reboot the MBP very seldom, I mostly put it in standby mode.
I see that there are other reports about this issue dating back to almost one year ago, so I think that it should be fixed ASAP because it stops me from using this app that would be otherwise very useful.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/growldiscuss/-/rS0uEf47FqMJ.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
The most I have seen so far is 52.7 mb

Christopher Forsythe

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 8:55:21 AM10/10/12
to growld...@googlegroups.com
There are a few on the beta list seeing higher, so I want to see what we can do about that. Otherwise HWG 2 would already have been submitted to the store.
--
Chris Forsythe

Joel Waxman

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 9:10:00 AM10/10/12
to growld...@googlegroups.com
Here is what I see with both entries.:
966     com.growl.HardwareGrowler.GNTPClientService    joel    0.0    2    26.0 MB    Intel (64 bit)    92    0.19
571     HardwareGrowler    joel    0.0    2    54.0 MB    Intel (64 bit)    184    0.65    


For some reason I never had the memory problems with GROWL or Hardware Growler.    And I never had it with Time machine Growler.  I wonder if it is dependent on certain applications run by others.

Christopher Forsythe

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 9:22:25 AM10/10/12
to growld...@googlegroups.com
Ya, that's always the question isn't it. And usually on a thread like this I'd start asking for more details, but since HWG is entirely redone none of it would help. Restarting the application isn't completely awesome, but at least there's a workaround. 

Fabrizio La Rosa

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 10:59:21 AM10/10/12
to growld...@googlegroups.com
I would be glad to join the beta program for HWG 2.0, please let me know if and how this is possible.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages