
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-labs-pi...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-labs-picasa-f...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.

AND,
I believe that google has ceased development of picasa in lu of picnic, ie
remote apps or *cloud* apps.
I also believe in *conspiracy* theorem :^)
I think that google is a much younger M$ and is getting people to become
dependent on them to the point that they will gain some of your bank
account. And the more slowly this develops, the greator the dependency
will be and the $$$s realized.
M$ let the theft (bootleg copies of win 3.0, 3.01, 3.+++, 95, 98) go on to
the point that now very few computers are manufactured w/o them getting
their cut which is a significant amount of the purchase price.
Note that many/most of google apps are not really open-source, but just
free. A small step to change that. :^(
BUT few *really* know....
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
> * Stephen<stephen...@gmail.com> [08-05-11 07:36]:
>> If you had searched the group before asking you'd have seen this question
>> asked before and answered. [?]
>>
>> There is no version for Linux, never was. All it was is the windows version
>> tweaked to run in the provided WINE binaries.
>>
>> Many of us have installed the 3.8 version successfully on our Linux boxen.
Just for curious -- can I install 3.8 separately from 3.0 or does it
insist on installing it over 3.0?
> AND,
>
> I believe that google has ceased development of picasa in lu of picnic, ie
> remote apps or *cloud* apps.
I don't trust clouds. I used picnic ONCE, which was more than enough.
Why do people keep throwing in eye candy when all people really want is
an efficient function? Or maybe I'm wrong...
> I also believe in *conspiracy* theorem :^)
Me too.
> I think that google is a much younger M$ and is getting people to become
> dependent on them to the point that they will gain some of your bank
> account. And the more slowly this develops, the greator the dependency
> will be and the $$$s realized.
>
> M$ let the theft (bootleg copies of win 3.0, 3.01, 3.+++, 95, 98) go on to
> the point that now very few computers are manufactured w/o them getting
> their cut which is a significant amount of the purchase price.
I remember hearing that there wasn't a single legal copy of windows 3.x
in the entire nation of Israel and that M$ knew it and LIKED it.
No idea how they could find that out, but I do know that when my husband
was selling assemblers back in the dark ages he sold a copy to ONE user
in Chicago and that maybe a year later there was an announcement of a
meeting for the Illinois user group in one of the free computer mags.
After he saw that he refused to sell anything to anybody in Illinois --
if they wanted his stuff they'd have to get a friend in Tennessee or
something to order it. That's probably regarded as discriminatory now,
so it's a good thing that nobody needs MSDOS cross assemblers any more.
> Note that many/most of google apps are not really open-source, but just
> free. A small step to change that. :^(
>
> BUT few *really* know....
What really gripes me about google is that I have one public account for
spam-catching uses (such as this group) and one more-or-less public
account for uses that involve real money. When I do a google function
it assumes that I'm now using the identity I used last for any purpose
whatsoever, and which is generally WRONG. It would be nice if they used
separate cookies for each account -- certainly faster than having to log
out and log in again. </rant>
--
Cheers, Bev
=============================================================
My house isn't a pigsty, it's an Immunity Enhancement Center.
certainly you can. As I recall 3.0 installs in /opt/google/picasa or
there-a-bouts and 3.{6,8} in
.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/Google/Picasa3/
> I don't trust clouds. I used picnic ONCE, which was more than enough.
> Why do people keep throwing in eye candy when all people really want
> is an efficient function? Or maybe I'm wrong...
>
...
> >I also believe in *conspiracy* theorem :^)
>
> Me too.
<:^)
> What really gripes me about google is that I have one public account
> for spam-catching uses (such as this group) and one more-or-less
> public account for uses that involve real money. When I do a google
> function it assumes that I'm now using the identity I used last for
> any purpose whatsoever, and which is generally WRONG. It would be
> nice if they used separate cookies for each account -- certainly
> faster than having to log out and log in again. </rant>
If you *really* think about this, it is a good thing. You _can_ have
different browsers open to different gmail/google accounts at the same
time.
> Bev
> do you have multiple sign in enabled on your account page?
> you can have 3 different accounts open
I only saw that option on the newest account. It seemed to indicate
that all the accounts would be linked in some way and I definitely don't
want that.
I can keep the logins separate (separate Firefox 6 tabs or windows) as
long as I don't click on a google-link in an email -- then everything
goes to hell in a handbasket and I have to log in all over again.
--
Cheers, Bev
=====================================================
"It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey