GAEfan
unread,Sep 2, 2011, 11:55:17 AM9/2/11Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Google App Engine
I remember back to the very first Google I/O, when App Engine was
brand new. During the keynotes, both Vic Gundotra and Marissa Mayer
gave inspiring talks about how Google's mission was to enhance the
user experience, to speed everything up, add millions of new
applications. And that, even by doing these for free, Google would
make a larger profit by taking the same cut from a larger pie. More
apps = more users = more traffic = more ads served = more $$$.
The concentration was on the user experience, and thus the quantity,
quality, and speed of services.
Now, Google is asking us to throttle back the user experience (via the
Instances & Latency sliders) to avoid exorbitant hosting fees.
Really? Did Vic and Marissa sign off on this?
I have an app that uses about 1 CPU hour per day, and serves about
250MB per day. It has always been in the free category, even though I
have billing enabled. In the "Estimated Charges Under New Pricing",
it looks like that will be going to about $70/month.
Now, I appreciate App Engine (notice my moniker), and do not expect it
to be free. But, an app like this should cost well under $20/month to
host. With all the optimizations I have already done, a fair price
should be closer to the $9 minimum. So, yes, I think $70/month is
exorbitant. And that is just one of my apps.
The only way to get this down to a reasonable amount, I will need to
get in the app settings and make the visitors wait longer, perhaps
even serving up a few 500's. Really??