--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
One thing you could try is to store all your tags serialized into one entity instead of 50 separate entities.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ZMynmWroQzgJ.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:08 PM, keakon lolicon <kea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Without memcache, the free quota will be used up in less than 500 PVs (I
> also need fetch articles, comments, etc.). Though I have used memcache very
> aggressively, I have no way to handle 10k PVs within the free quota since
> the memcache often loses the cached data.
I also suffered from this.
memcache server very unfriendly to small apps.
I remember google says they hardly drop memcached data.
However, my experience was when instance down, and then a request comes,
new instance up, the cached data may not be there, is this cause to
instance start from
another datacenter or the cached data just droped when there is no
instance running?
--
Regards,
twitter:@yinhm
有微码头:http://yinhm.appspot.com
github: https://github.com/yinhm
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
I've thought of caching to the blobstore too, for stuff that will include a lot of entities and don't change a lot.
Has anyone tried this, is it plausible?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/C2DjBaNsCW8J.
I didn't merge entities together because it will make my code hard to understand and maintain. The max entity size also prevented me to do this.
Robert
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
This forum thread is only 20kb, add some meta data and you are at 30kb max. For an article with 20 comments.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/p7g5kE9hUXEJ.
"But part of what you are getting with App Engine is the ability to scale when you need to without having to completely re-architect"That's kind of ironic. To start with app engine YOU HAVE to completely re-architect the app to accommodate App Engine (compared to every other platform/framework out there).
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/cYtd6BhdQJYJ.