Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar
Vic, if you have time, would you mind getting back into irc?
Got some stuff to talk about. Everyone else is of course also very
welcome to join in.
> I'd like to thank all of you for making fancy so awesome!.
>
> It would be really nice to have the new web design for the next release (I
> hope we can bootstrap in a week, and make a release by that time).
Yeah, I was thinking about a new release (0.3) as well, once we're
fully running on rbx. We'd also have to make it more public by
then. Maybe we'll have a new website by then? That would be really cool ;)
We'll see. If not, that's fine, too.
Let's get hacking so we get Fancy fully running on rbx soon =)
--
================================
Christopher Bertels
http://www.fancy-lang.org
http://www.adztec-independent.de
GPG Key ID: 0x2345b203
2010/10/7 <goy...@gmail.com>:
I suppose I could work on a treetop-based ruby parser. It might be
slower than using the antlr-version (don't know, we can compare them),
but then we'd have something independent of the interpreter for now.
This really helps since there are so many dependencies currently it's
not very easy to isolate things. E.g. we need all of the current
stdlib written in Fancy to even run the interpreter (otherwise the
whole to_rsexp stuff won't work) but at the same time need
rubinius-specific code etc. It _can_ work, just isn't as
effective. Also this slows down the whole compilation & running
process alot. Will look into that later.
@Nils: Sorry, don't want to discredit your work on the ruby parser, we
can always get back to your version. It might be faster I think, since
treetop uses a different parsing algorithm. But we can check that out
once you're done with your antlr parser.
What do you think?
2010/10/7 Christopher Bertels <bakk...@googlemail.com>: