Dear Tim,
Hi Par,
First make sure you're using the most recent version of DMRcate (currently 1.8.6).
Then, as per the manual, you'll need to add annotation=c(array = "IlluminaHumanMethylationEPIC", annotation = "ilm10b2.hg19") to your call to cpg.annotate() for EPIC data. It should work from there.Best,
Tim
On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 2:28:50 AM UTC+10, vk wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epigenomics forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epigenomicsfor...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Olivia,
I don't think specifying a canonical cutoff from those p-values is particularly useful. The low values you are seeing are from the post-smoothing χ2 test, which is very powerful and often gives very low p-values, hence the caveat you see when running cpg.annotate(). Unfortunately tests with varying levels of power (another example is the hypergeometric test when doing functional enrichment over a number of terms with varying numbers of genes) are prone to this bias. I'd say the p-values here are only useful in a relative sense i.e. comparing the DM signal from different loci from the same fit. DMRs are instead benchmarked against the number of significant limma probes from the given user-defined cutoff fdr in cpg.annotate(), which IMO is much more robust. To vary the cutoff, I would relax the fdr argument in cpg.annotate() to 0.1, 0.25 etc. to see if you get any DM probes at that "significance" level. dmrcate() will then do the rest with the aforementioned benchmarking with the current default. For an overall significance metric per DMR, use the Stouffer transformation (derived from limma FDRs, not the χ2 test).
Hope this helps,
Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Epigenomics forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/epigenomicsforum/G3yO92pEqzQ/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to epigenomicsfor...@googlegroups.com.
Dear Tim,
Is there anyway to categorize DMRs output from DMRcate into hyper/hypo methylated like what is possible in minfi by using bumphunter method? And also is there a way to extract regions of the hyper-methylated promoters regions from DMRcate.output?
Many thanks in advance,