Installation of Mobile Towers in Public Parks in Dwarka

[Shubhi Mehrotra]

Dear all,

A mobile tower is being constructed in DDA park in Sector 4 Dwarka. When we contacted the CE Dwarka, he informed us that 100 such towers are to be constructed (mostly in the parks). All permission and other requirements have been given to the Reliance people. All sites have been checked by DDA staff and found to be satisfactory.

Question is being raised by the common people as to why are the green parks being targetted? Every morning and evening kids, youngsters, senior people, all come to the park for walking, strolling, doing Yoga, or just meeting up with each other. Why can't other spaces be found for these radiation emitting towers( after dishs are set and frequency increased plenty to be afraid off)?

A protest by young kids was organised in the sector 4 park adjoining United Apartments on Friday 27 Aug 2015. It is important for all Dwarka residents to unite for this cause. If these little ones can do it why not all of us.

Towers can be put along Najafgarh drain, empty lots, main crossings and other locations. Dda is looking for rent from these towers to fill its coffers, but at the cost of human lives.

Please lets help each other and our future generations. 

I am sending 2/3 mails.

warm regards,

Shubhi Mehrotra

[Prem Vir Singh]

I understand that there is a court ruling on these towers. How can DDA break law ?

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Shubhi Mehrotra <shubhim...@gmail.com> wrote:

This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (shubhim...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

--
Membership Application- Please visit...
http://www.dwarkaforum.org/self-support/
 
We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
DWARKA FORUM (Regd) www.dwarkaforum.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residen...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Arun Banerjee]

Last year this issue was raised with hue & cry. Protests by general public during Rahagiri was also done. But lastly public demand was brushed under the carpet.

--

[REJIMON C K]

Injustice happens to neighbors
Others remains mute
When it affects them they make it an issue

When sector 12 residents & 22/23 residents raising it almost 8 month back other sectors remain silent or acted or supported?

This will go
No blame but reality

We have sympathy but fight is not easy 1

Already matter in ngt cic

But reality in thename of call drops this will continue

Enjoy 4G differed @ less than 2G net work infra. Ofcourse pay for 6G

Send by Wireless Device

[Arun Banerjee]

Going away from mobile tower. The drop call rate is suddenly rising and an advertisement by a private player to provide fastest 4G connection is a slap in the face of Government players like MTNL & BSNL. Why Government is not challenging the advertisement is amusing. 

Regarding mobile tower when it comes to one's own colony or park,  they wake-up.  When neighbourhood were demanding removal of such mobile towers majority were mute spectators. There must one voice in chorus that green area must not be allowed for commercial exploitation. Go for land line, to get something have to sacrifice something. 

Arun Banerjee

অরূণ ব্যানার্জী 

αrun ßanerjee

Dwarka

Use email save tree

(M) 9868227877

http://oroon.blogspot.com/

https://www.facebook.com/arun.banerjee.714

https://twitter.com/Banerji_D

[Shubhi Mehrotra]

I was part of the demonstration in Raahgiri too. I have been opposing the installation of towers near Apt buildings since last year. Here the issue it Public parks being leased by DDA for increasing their funds. Tomorrow some temporary shacks may come up in the same parks and DDA having given them on rent to sell household items or other things.

 DDA is custodian of the parks. It does not own them. We as tax payers are the real owners. Was any consent taken from us before giving these parks spaces on rent. Dwarka does not have any RWA so DDA is taking advantage of it. Same happened with Water issue. We had to buy water through water tankers for almost 7 years.

We all have to wake up and spread this message through facebook, twitter, intagram etc. We can try to get together. The children have started something and it should be taken forward. How they they understand the power of Unity if we don't take their efforts forward.

Hoping for best from all of you

Regards

Shubhi Mehrotra

Sector 4

[R. Dua]

Shri Reji ji, Shri Arunji ji you have echoed exactly most of us are thinking in this matter.

Internet and Mobile usage is almost a necessity.Though, it is us who have made it so.The sign of the times, I guess.
What options one can look at is how other countries are dealing with this issue.We need not accept the same as it is.
Regards to all.

[Anil K Rajput]

Most of us are unaware of the facts that DDA is Custodian agency

and not the owner of parks , parks are owned by the people living

in that particular area , price of land purchased in Dwarka is inclusive

of the roads, parks, pedestrian passage , DDA can be challenged in

the court for allotting the public place for any other use which is different

from the Master plan.

Anil Rajput  

[REJIMON C K]

Mme, I did shared a lot of information in this matter. Mr. Pankaj from sec 12 also shared.

But unfortunately no one seems interested in Dwarka to fight such matters.

if some one is interested must use these info under RTIA which evidently prove beyond any doubt this is CORRUPTION nothing else.

Some Informations received and still challenged are as follows. The matter is also with CIC and recently Vasant Kunj residents also raised alarm.

I dont agree with argument that all need 3/4G so we should allow them to errect these towers.

Para

 

1.         as Per RTI ID No. CE/DWK/26/80/14/Misc/9002 dated 4/12/2014 stated that feasibility study available. Please provide the copy of the feasibility study through DDA Website under Section 4 of RTIA 2005.

 

Answer : Feasibility report is available in the form hard copy an same is enclosed (6 page)

 

Appeal: PIO/FAA CE Dwarka is very smartly MISLEADING a Table contain list of site is handwritten and stated as FEASIBILITY Study. IS THIS HOW PROFESSIONALISM in DDA ? Is this how Public Properties are evaluated. Are these people paid money to generate tables and handwritten it as FEASIBILITY Report ? The PIO/FAA is MISLEADING must be punished under RTIA 2005.

 

 

2.         As per above RTI ID 9002 dated 4/12/2012 it was informed that Director (Horticulture and Dy. Director Horticulture was consulted through telephonically and personally. In this regard please provide the copies of the records and noting of these consultation on recorded. Please provide under provisions of govt business conduct allows telephonic and personal consultation for decision making. Please provide the certified copies extract of these provision. 

Answer : No Such information available 

Appeal: PIO/FAA CE Dwarka is MISLEADING . In the previous RTI reply it was said telephonic converstiion. Does all work and order in DDA is through why no file noting? There is some thing serious in these. The PIO/FAA is MISLEADING must be punished under RTIA 2005.

 

 

3.         as per MPD 2021 the parks are categorised as GREEN SPACE/  PARK. Please provide the ownership of Green Space/ Parks with DDA if so documents in support of the same.

 

Answer : DDA Park belong to DDA a whole and no individual ownership is given.

 

Appeal: PIO/FAA CE Dwarka is not providing the documents to support that park belong to DDA or Public ?  We are not asking whether it belong one individual or not(that question does not arise).

Please direct to provide documents to substantiate the park belong to DDA

 

 

7.         Please provide Minutes and other details of DDA board decision in the matter.

 

 

 

Answer : No such minutes available.  

 

Appeal: Without a minutes or oder how public land is given out that too in super fast mode. Rohini plot even after courts even today not allotted nor given poession but Reliance everything is so fast in our country ? 

 

 

 

8.         Please provide any other meeting that may be part of this decision process for allotment of DDA Public Park for Mobile Towers.

 

Appeal: Without a minutes or oder how public land is given out that too in super fast mode. Rohini plot even after courts even today not allotted nor given poession but Reliance everything is so fast in our country ? 

 

 

 

10.       Please provide reason recorded in the files and communication for CE Dwarka to issue a letter dated 31/10/2014 read as “All SE are requested to instruct their EE not to object installation of Mobile towers in the enclosed locations”.

 

 

Answer : copy of VC letter attached.  

 

Appeal: The info sought is the reason recorded for issuig instruction to EE. While in larger cases and affecting no such instruction issued. Is this is about CORRUPTION as widely spred? 

 

11.       Please provide the circumstance recorded and reason arised on records for issue of such letter.

 

 

Answer : Not covered under RTI.

 

Appeal: Is this is covered under Prevention of Corruption Act Mr. DP Singh?  On one line you have quoted VC and second line you stating that it is not covered under RTI so how come 10^th para it is covered under RTIA ?

 

12.       Was there any personal motive or interest for the CE Dwarka to issue such letter.

 

 

Answer :  No

 

Appeal: WE TRUST YOU  

 

13.       Was there any adverse behaviour reported from EE/AE/JE posted in Dwarka objected to Mobile Installation, if so please provide the details.

 

 

Answer : no such ifno

 

Appeal:  If no such behaviour from EE/AE/SE why did the order issued by CE ?

 

14.       Please provide documents and delegation of power issued to AE (QC) to CE Dwarka to hand over possession to licensee. As per the letter the possession shown by list dated  29/10/2014.

 

 

Answer :  Enclosed

 

15.       In matter of just 5 days ie. Possession letter issued by Dy Dir PLC dated 22/10/2014 and 28 sites were hand over on 29/10/2014.

 

Answer : Yes 

 

Appeal: The question duly prepared online and missed during the email transmission.   The information sought How the 28 sites handed over in mater of 5 days. In such a HURRY all done. Please provide supporting documents on site handing over. NO CORRUPTION NO FAVOURITSM ?

 

 

16.       Please provide the evidence of handing over the physical sites of 28 sites from 22/10/2014 to 29/10/2014.

 

 

Answer : copy attached

 

 

Appeal: The question duly prepared online and missed during the email transmission.   The information sought How the 28 sites handed over in mater of 5 days. In such a HURRY all done. Please provide supporting documents on site handing over. NO CORRUPTION NO FAVOURITSM ?

 

17.       Date and Dak Reg No at CE Dwarka office receipt of Dy Dir PLC possession letter dated 22/10/2014. Date and internal movement of the same poession letter to AE(QC) to CE Dwarka along with file notings and marking on the original letter be provided certified copies.

 

 

Answer :  poseesion letter 22/10/2014 recevied on diarly no. 13057 dated 27/10/2014

 

Appeal:  Very fast processing- As if the salary or perk is being distributed in DDA ? Is this is normal or their super efficiency ?

 

18.       Have CE and AE(QC) to CE Dwarka worked on holidays of weekend for this particular project. Please provide the attendance and Office Movement Entry and Exit Register certified copy from Guard and Vehicle Movement Records for this period.

 

 

Answer : No attendance details proved, informed CE comes on Saturday or holiday as per requirmetns. In this case for Reliance CE came ? NO attendance or Log book provided

 

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

 

g.         Have the site were taken physical possession within 10 days of from the date of issue of letter of possession letter. If so please provide the possession letter date for each site and physical possession date for each sites.

 

 

Answer : yes possession letter 28 is 22/1/2014 and physical possession 29/10/2014.

 

Appeal: Please provide documents concerning the taking over, possession documents and delayed take over sites. 

 

21.       Please provide the RTI Application ID No DDATY/R/2014/60243 dated 2/12/2014 Movement Reocrds with your department along with FILE NOTING for the same RTI Application.

 

 

Answer : No documents such as File noting provided. 

 

Appeal: The said Appeal reply of FAA/CE vide 654 3/2/2015 2017 dated 15/4/2015

 

22.       as per RTI Ref No. CE/Dwk/10/25/14/RTI/2946/AA366/DDA /654 darted 3/2/2015 transferred to PLC Dy. Director, Please provide the Dak Register Copy and file noting for the delay in responding to this RTI forwarded u/s 6(3) of RTI Act 2005.

 

 

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

 

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the RTI was forwarded to PIO/LPC.  Specific details of transfer u/s 6(3) provided evean after that PIO/LPC response confirmes Sheer negligence and delinquency of LPC PIO evident here. 

 

23.       As per RTI ID above the para 1 to 6 and 10 to 15 pertain to PLC Department. Please provide list of staff concerned with reply of this RTI along with their Name, Father Name, Designation, Residential Address and any other details including Mobile, Email ID official and Personal which were operated from DDA Office infrastructure.

 

 

 

Answer : S K Goyal AE *AC) and full details not provided.

 

Appeal:details provided WITHOUT proper address of Room, Telephone, Father name, Residential , Tel, Email and Mobile

 

 

25.       Please provide reason recorded by CE Dwarka as FAA and SE HQ Dwarka for delay for responding to RTI ID file don 2/12/2014 responding only on 3/2/2015 while a possession of over 28 Mobile Tower sites were handling in a matter of FIVE Days where as replying an RTI takes over 60 days?

 

 

 

Answer : Not covered under RTIA

 

Appeal: The PIO and FAA be directed to provide full information, if there is no CORRUPTION in any manner.

Para

1.         as Per RTI ID No. CE/DWK/26/80/14/Misc/9002 dated 4/12/2014 stated that feasibility study available. Please provide the copy of the feasibility study through DDA Website under Section 4 of RTIA 2005.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

2.         As per above RTI ID 9002 dated 4/12/2012 it was informed that Director (Horticulture and Dy. Director Horticulture was consulted through telephonically and personally. In this regard please provide the copies of the records and noting of these consultation on recorded. Please provide under provisions of govt business conduct allows telephonic and personal consultation for decision making. Please provide the certified copies extract of these provision.  

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

3.         as per MPD 2021 the parks are categorised as GREEN SPACE/  PARK. Please provide the ownership of Green Space/ Parks with DDA if so documents in support of the same.

Answer : DDA Land owning agency of the parks maintained by DDA 

Appeal: The information sought on ownership rights. DDA have not produced any document that is is DDA property and not Public Property.

4.         as per MPD 2021 the parks are categorised as Green Space/ Parks. If the Park is for PUBLIC Purpose how the COMMERCIAL Purpose being executed by DDA LPC department without the consent of the Public? Please provide the  relevant document that empowers DDA to lease out PUBLIC Park for commercial actitivies.  

Answer : as per Sec 17 Caluse 8(2) of MPD2021 public utiilities are permitted in All zones.  

Appeal: the information sought on consent of public for allowing public space for commercial purpose wihtout change of land use.  It is also to be unoted the answer as per MPD 2021 Public utilities are defined. Please provide the documents support allowing the Mobile Tower comes under Public Utility that too owned by Private players on public park .

5.         As per MPD 2021 Table 9.4 permission for use premises in Sub Zone mentioned have no reflection on use for Mobile Towers. Please provide the notification , documents and file noting under which Master Plan 2021 modified to allow these Mobile Towers in Parks.

Answer : as per Sec 17 Caluse 8(2) of MPD2021 public utilities are permitted in All zones.  

Appeal: the information sought on consent of public for allowing public space for commercial purpose wihtout change of land use.  It is also to be unoted the answer as per MPD 2021 Public utilities are defined. Please provide the documents support allowing the Mobile Tower comes under Public Utility that too owned by Private players on public park . Please provide the documents

6.         Have the LPC department taken any consultation with Master Plan Division and Planning Department before taking decision on calling the Tender and License, if so please provide the relevant communications, file notings.

Answer : Not required in view of para -4.  

Appeal: If this was not required then  please provide the file noting mentioning exemption that the consultation not required. .

7.         Please provide Minutes and other details of DDA board decision in the matter.

Answer : Not applicable in view of above.  

Appeal: Please provide the minutes if there is one. If there no minutes, please confirm the same .

8.         Please provide any other meeting that may be part of this decision process for allotment of DDA Public Park for Mobile Towers.

Answer : copies of the related nothing portion attached. P

Appeal: We sought copies of decision and meeting decisions. Not provided by PIO completely.

9.         Have any Land use changed for the sites handed over, if so please provide the relevant documents.

Answer : Not required in view of para -4.  

Appeal: If this was not required please provide the file noting mentioning exemption granted. 

10.       Please provide reason recorded in the files and communication for CE Dwarka to issue a letter dated 31/10/2014 read as “All SE are requested to instruct their EE not to object installation of Mobile towers in the enclosed locations”.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

11.       Please provide the circumstance recorded and reason arised on records for issue of such letter.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

12.       Was there any personal motive or interest for the CE Dwarka to issue such letter.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

13.       Was there any adverse behaviour reported from EE/AE/JE posted in Dwarka objected to Mobile Installation, if so please provide the details.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

14.       Please provide documents and delegation of power issued to AE (QC) to CE Dwarka to hand over possession to licensee. As per the letter the possession shown by list dated  29/10/2014.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

15.       In matter of just 5 days ie. Possession letter issued by Dy Dir PLC dated 22/10/2014 and 28 sites were hand over on 29/10/2014.

Answer : No question asked 

Appeal: The question duly prepared online and missed during the email transmission.   The information sought How the 28 sites handed over in mater of 5 days. In such a HURRY all done. Please provide supporting documents on site handing over.

16.       Please provide the evidence of handing over the physical sites of 28 sites from 22/10/2014 to 29/10/2014.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

17.       Date and Dak Reg No at CE Dwarka office receipt of Dy Dir PLC possession letter dated 22/10/2014. Date and internal movement of the same poession letter to AE(QC) to CE Dwarka along with file notings and marking on the original letter be provided certified copies.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

18.       Have CE and AE(QC) to CE Dwarka worked on holidays of weekend for this particular project. Please provide the attendance and Office Movement Entry and Exit Register certified copy from Guard and Vehicle Movement Records for this period.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the matter handled by PIO/LPC also. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to CE/Dwarka u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

19.       Please provide the deatails of the E-Auction held from 3/9/2014

a.         Please provide the name & details of staff or consultant prepared the documents for E-Auction of sites for Mobile towers.

Answer : Techncial documents were prepared by ITI Ltd while adminstration are prepared by LPC Branch.

Appeal: How did ITI Ltd selected and what rule and procedure for the same. Please provide the Financial documents prepared by which department.  

b.         If any consultatnt was appointed, please provide complete details and scope and term of the consultancy agreement.

Answer : No consultant 

c.         Please provide the name of the staff who determined the License fee, Renewal Charges and Renewal period

Answer : Financial terms were determined by Finane Wing of DDA   

Appeal: The information from Financ wing not provide nor transfered. In addition the PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to PIO/FM u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

d.         Please provide reason recorded in the file for period of 5 year for the license and name of the staff or person proposed this.

Answer : 5 year term was decided by ommitte headed by FM. 

Appeal: How the term 5 year arrived, no documents provided nor PIO/LPC not transfer the matter to u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

e.         Total Amount received by DDA for the leasing out the Public area from DDA for Mobile Towers with break up for site wise, area wise, district wise.

Answer : details attached  

Appeal:  The amount received by DDA not provided with details as above.

f.          Please provide the  certified copies of Calculation sheet and method to arrive current License fee, Renewal Charge and any other charges.

Answer : Copies attached 

Appeal: No calculation sheet found on Lincense fee, Rnewal and other charges. 

g.         Have the site were taken physical possession within 10 days of from the date of issue of letter of possession letter. If so please provide the possession letter date for each site and physical possession date for each sites.

Answer : The reply vauge. 

Appeal: Please provide documents concerning the taking over, possession documents and delayed take over sites.  

h.         The list provided by DDA for Mobile towers not specify exact physical location within Public Park and other areas, please provide reason for NOT mentioning the exact location.

Answer : The errection of Towers depend upon transmission waves with specified latituted and longtitue resulting in shifting of locations some times within the park.

Appeal:  The Tender documents or other docuemnts found no such mention. Please provie exact location allotted at each park site.

The reply found vauge to mislead as if techncinal jargon not understood. Please desist from such answer and provide information on records.

i.          With exact location not mentioning, have DDA LPC department handed over the entire park or area to licensee ?

Answer : 15x10 sq ft has been provided for erection of Mobile towers.  

Appeal: The info sought reason for not mentioned exact location in all documents raises serious question on INTEGRITY of  those involved.

j.          As per RTI 18 tower sites have been allotted, please provide current status of these sites along with Pictures and drawings or any other documents available with DDA.

Answer : No such record is available in compiled form.  

Appeal: What information does the LPC branch posess about the exisitng 18 sites Please provide drawings and pictures as DDA claim they are land owning agency.

20.       Role of LPC Department

a.         Please provide the LPC Department details under Section 4 of RTIA 2005 with 17 manuals. If the same available through DDA website please provide completed web PAGE address to access. If not please provide the copies.

Answer : Matter refer to System Department.  

Appeal: How the information pertain to LPC pertain to system. The docuemtns to be provided by LPC and till date no such no information available on website of DDA. The compliane of seciton 4 is LPC PIO responsibility and not Systems. System department only upload them. If the LPC  provided these documents to systems, please provide the date of the same.

b.         Please provide the list of staffs with Name, Father Name, Designation, Residential Address, Tel, Email, Mobile and Official Address

Answer : details provided WITHOUT proper address of Room, Telephone, Father name, Residential , Tel, Email and Mobile

Appeal:The collussion of CORRUPT proves by always stay away from Transparency. The infoamtion sought is deneied .

c.         Please provide as per Department of Personal and Vigilance department record any enquiry completed or pending any of the staff who handled the Mobile Tower Leasing out programme, if so please provide details.

Answer : No enquiry pending against staff of LPC 

Appeal: How this information from LPC. This was sought from Vigilane department. Have LPC self declared vigilance wing of DDA ? 

d.         Please provide List of Staff from LPC department defaulted in Annual Asset Declaration from year 2005. Along with years under which defaulted against each name.

 

Answer :No record available. 

Appeal: This evidently suggest the staff were not following the  RULE of Conduct and may be involved in gross CORRUPTION. This information sought from Personal and Vigilance wing of DDA the PIO with malafide intention  not transfer u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

orruption Angle information

e.         Please provide the current Annual Asset List submitted for 2014 and copies of the same by respective staffs of LPC.

Answer : copies provided at the time of inspection 

Appeal: Why, it cannot be photocopied before ? Some LOCK in the system ? Please provid the copies of of AAR and Annual performance Assesment Report.  

f.          Have any department of Vigilance and Personal or external agency found amazed increase in the Annual Assets of LPC staffs, if so measures taken by respective department and its current status.

Answer :No 

Appeal: This reply is self judgment of LPC PIO>  This information sought from Personal and Vigilance wing of DDA the PIO with motive seriously doub the intention  not transfer u/s 6(3) of RTIA 2005.

g.         Please provide the service History of Director and Dy, Director, Asst Director  LPC served during the period of License of Mobile Towers activities started.

Answer :.  details provide without History.

Appeal: 

h.         Have any PLC department staff received Cash or in Kind for the Tower License, if not please provide as per records and document the method adopted by DDA to verify the same.

Answer :.  No 

Appeal: How come thi sis arrived wihtout verifying. Have LPC have its own assumed ACB branch and ED and IT?

  This to be transfer to Vigialnce

21.       Please provide the RTI Application ID No DDATY/R/2014/60243 dated 2/12/2014 Movement Reocrds with your department along with FILE NOTING for the same RTI Application.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the RTI was forwarded to PIO/LPC. Sheer negligence and delinquency of LPC PIO evident here.  

22.       as per RTI Ref No. CE/Dwk/10/25/14/RTI/2946/AA366/DDA /654 darted 3/2/2015 transferred to PLC Dy. Director, Please provide the Dak Register Copy and file noting for the delay in responding to this RTI forwarded u/s 6(3) of RTI Act 2005.

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka as the RTI was forwarded to PIO/LPC.  Specific details of transfer u/s 6(3) provided evean after that PIO/LPC response confirmes Sheer negligence and delinquency of LPC PIO evident here.  

23.       As per RTI ID above the para 1 to 6 and 10 to 15 pertain to PLC Department. Please provide list of staff concerned with reply of this RTI along with their Name, Father Name, Designation, Residential Address and any other details including Mobile, Email ID official and Personal which were operated from DDA Office infrastructure.

Answer : 20 b 

Appeal:details provided WITHOUT proper address of Room, Telephone, Father name, Residential , Tel, Email and Mobile

24.       Advertisment by DDA dated 13/2/2015titled Installation of Mobile Towers at DDA Land:

a.         Please provide the file noting concerning the drafting of this advertisement.

b.         Name, Designation of the officials involved in the drafting along with department

c.         Total Amount spend on Advertisement and approval of finance and heads under which the same approved.

d.         The Public notice mentioning only about the Radition effect issue. However the representation from RWA and elected Representatives contains about the location in Parks and most importantly not adhering to the policy issued by DoT.

Answer : 

Appeal: The awarness of Radition why DDA interest ? Is there no Health deparmtent, Radiation control authority or DoT or TRAI in India working ? Does LPC assumed charge of all these institutions?  Why no clarificiaton on RWA representation on Park misuse included ?

 

e.         The Public notice only mentioned about Radio Frequency (RF), no mention about MW- Micro Wave transmission, please  provide notes related to MW.

f.          Please provide reason for DDA to ignore the DoT note http://www.dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/Advisory%20Guidelines%20For%20State%20Govts%20effective%20from%2001-08-13.pdf

Answer :  The answer refr to Lucknow and Allahbad Court. What about CIC and Delhi or Mumbai High Court orders ?

Appeal: The issue about non adherence of DOT guidelines. Which due to HIGH CORRUPTION and NEXUS allowed these mobile towers. Where are the list of compliances as per the DOT guides issued 13/8/2013?

g.         As per above policy DDA to ensure Structural, Fire safety and airport clearance to list a few. Please provide certified copies of the listed certificates and documents that DDA to ensure before commissioning of thee Mobile towers in compliance with DoT Guidelines.

Answer :  It will be responsiblity of Licensee

Appeal: Prima facie it is evidently proved these safety and clerance were not got by Mobile Towers company . Have LPC cancelled it or own the responsibility which amount to CRIMINAL NEGLIEGANCE ?

h.         Have DDA initated any Sealing and Demolishing drive or Notice issued to Licensee for Violation of Building/Structural norms and violation of existing Rules and Provisions and DDA Act 1957?

Answer : NO

Appeal: Prima facie it is evidently proved these towers as on date Illegal. So why the LPC not initiated Sealing and demolishing under DDA Act ?  Is there a nexus with LPC DDA and Mobile Towers company ?. Have LPC cancelled it or own the responsibility which amount to CRIMINAL NEGLIEGANCE ? In sector 22 it was even established on record cutting trees and damaging trees amount serious violation of Envniroment normas. As per norms Mr. Prabhjot Singh should have been booked by now under these and put on suspension along with others encoruaging the environment damage & compromising public safety . 

25.       Please provide reason recorded by CE Dwarka as FAA and SE HQ Dwarka for delay for responding to RTI ID file don 2/12/2014 responding only on 3/2/2015 while a possession of over 28 Mobile Tower sites were handling in a matter of FIVE Days where as replying an RTI takes over 60 days?

Answer : Pertain to CE/Dwaka

Appeal: How the information pertain to CE/Dwarka  alone? as the RTI was forwarded to PIO/LPC. 

Please conduct hearing as per RTIA 2005 within time frame.

http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/placement-of-mobile-phone-towers

REJIMON C K.

Sent over wireless Network ... Google Nexus Phone.

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/RejimonCK/180529618720807

 

 

[Vineet]

In addition to the RADIATION hazard, jeopardizing the green areas and foliage, these towers have created deaf spots which increases the call drops and signal outages.

The mobile companies are focusing only on improving 4G internet services instead of first ensuring to provide stable 2G call services. This is increasing the call drops and reducing the conversation quality for the existing mobile subscribers significantly

Best Regards

Vineet Aggarwal

[Pankaj P]

Glad to see that residents / children of United Apt, Sector 4 protested against upcoming mobile tower in park adjoining their society.

Every sector of Dwarka Sub City has the same issue. Be it Sector 19 next to OPG World School; Sector 12 Opp Kendriya Vidyalaya or at several other places.

We the residents of Dwarka have been fighting lone battles against Indus / Reliance but need of the hour is coming together on ONE PLATFORM, which seems impossible in a place like Dwarka Sub City.

Residents of Sector 12 tried every trick. We asked for help from SDMC councillor; she was of no help. Local MLA managed to stop tower erection for a month but afterwards he couldn't intervene as it is a DDA park.

Requested MP but he didn't responded even. Later we collected signatures of 600-700 residents and mailed to MP Parvesh Varma only afterwards he did sent letter to LG which had no effect.

Finally we approached NGT which gave stay on operationalization of tower but didn't stopped erection of tower. Two hearings are over & next is in Mid September.

I must bring this to the notice of Dwarka Forum members that Modus Operandi of Indus Tower / Reliance is that they are taking up one tower at a time. They know that residents of Dwarka are least united and scattered protest won't reach media / our MP / Urban Development Minister nd they will keep on putting towers on the park meant for our children.

Wake up guys else its too late.

Regards,

Pankaj


P.s. A mobile tower of Indus was coming next to Vasant Valley School reportedly owned by India Today group. I learnt that they just managed to shift the location of the tower far away as Honble LG was kind enough to hear their request.

We are ordinary citizens & our Un elected Government 'Honble LG' will not bother to listen to us.

[Shubhi Mehrotra]

Lets all unite. We should get labourers and damage the foundation on which the pillar will stand. In Sector 4 park, they completed the base yesterday. If we are not protesting against wrongdoings then we are also to blame. We should follow "Gita".

Regards

Shubhi Mehrotra

[Arun Banerjee]

Surprised to see the attitude of our Hon'ble MP (non-responsive).  MP responds only after getting 600-700 signatures. This attitude of our elected leader is very ridiculous. 

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Pankaj P <panka...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
Membership Application- Please visit...
http://www.dwarkaforum.org/self-support/

We are on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Dwarkaforum
DWARKA FORUM (Regd) www.dwarkaforum.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA FORUM (Regd)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dwarka-residen...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Arun Banerjee]

Why go for damaging the structure. Put photos of God or Goddess and start worshiping every morning by putting few flowers. Let it be by morning walkers. If that doesn't work put concentrate salt solution.