| <record> | |
| <header> | |
| <identifier>oai:generic.eprints.org:9</identifier> | |
| <identifier>http://humbox.ac.uk/9/</identifier> | |
| <datestamp>2012-06-11T18:48:56Z</datestamp> | |
| <setSpec>74797065733D7265736F75726365</setSpec></header> | |
| <metadata> | |
| <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | |
| <dc:title>Using EEBO to compare the quarto and Folio editions of Shakespeare's Henry V</dc:title> | |
| <dc:identifier.uri>http://humbox.ac.uk/id/eprint/9</dc:identifier.uri> | |
| <dc:creator>University, Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam</dc:creator> | |
| <dc:description>As EEBO has images of every book printed in England before 1700, it offers students studying Shakespeare the opportunity to look at both the quarto and Folio editions of his plays. By using EEBO to look at different editions of the same play we can start to think about the decisions made by editors when confronted with this dilemma of choice. Which version is best? We can also think about why these differences occur.</dc:description> | |
| <dc:date>2005</dc:date> | |
| <dc:type>Resource</dc:type> | |
| <dc:type>NonPeerReviewed</dc:type> | |
| <dc:format>application/msword</dc:format> | |
| <dc:identifier>http://humbox.ac.uk/9/2/EEBO_Quarto___Folio_of_Henry_V.doc</dc:identifier> | |
| <dc:identifier>Using EEBO to compare the quarto and Folio editions of Shakespeare's Henry V</dc:identifier> | |
| <dc:relation>http://humbox.ac.uk/9/</dc:relation> | |
|
<dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution
Non-commercial Share Alike
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/></dc:rights></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record>
Â
The
dc.identifier.uri field appears in the record.
Â
When I view
the item in the full view it shows the field as
dc.identifier.uri   http://humbox.ac.uk/id/eprint/9
However when
I view the METS metadat (using http://localhost:8080/xmlui/metadata/handle/123456789/4216/mets.xml)
it shows the field as
<dim:field element="identifier.uri" mdschema="dc">
</dim:field>
Â
In the database the metadat field is recorded in the metadatavalue
table with a metadata_field_id of 72 and the entry in the
metadatafieldregistry table shows the element name as identifier.uri as
the field is unknown and I currently have harvester.unknownfield set to
add.
Â
Can anybody point me to where I look to see why DSpace is not
recognising the field (is it because of pattern matching for
handles?
Â
Regards,
  Â
Ben |