--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
+1 for this write up.Not that your write up suggests this, but I am cautious to turn folks away from django-users because they ask a python only question. From a venn diagram perspective the django community is a subset of the python community. Using Django to teach folks more about Python is a win for everyone (django, python, open source, ...). My personal heuristic on what is off topic on django-users for python specific questions is this: if the question is python only, if it is ultimately going to be used in a django project, then I consider that on topic.
BrianOn Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Venkatraman S <venk...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 from me.
(but i see some in IRC who do not know python but start learning it along with Django - so probably we need not be too strict about this clause?)
-V
--
please go ahead and add it.
--
regards
KG
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
Coimbatore LUG rox
http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/
On 11 Jul 2011 10:07, "in...@webbricks.co.uk" <in...@webbricks.co.uk> wrote:
>
> what about mentioning this as well?
>
> http://learnpythonthehardway.org/
Havent come across this before.. perhaps you could send a review to the list of your experiences with it?
If anyone else in the list has used this ,could you post some thoughts about it please??
the person who wrote it was quite often on #django
>
> If anyone else in the list has used this ,could you post some thoughts
> about
> it please??
a bit painful, but does a good job if one has the patience not to cheat.
what do you mean by 'accurate'?
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 12:05 +0100, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> Actually, that does look quite nice. Although I can't comment on howwhat do you mean by 'accurate'?
> accurate the information is without using it myself.
>
> KG, is the site fairly accurate??
--
I can confirm it is accurate.
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 12:18 +0100, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> > what do you mean by 'accurate'?I can confirm it is accurate.
> >
>
> As in, did the tutorial contain any errors / false / inaccurate
> information?
> I would check it myself, but haven't got any spare time at the
> moment :/ It
> looks very cleanly done though, so if someone could confirm the
> content is
> accurate, I'd defo say lets include it in the list.
--