The key thing about farming is that it is a mechanism of economically
converting large amounts of diffuse solar energy to the concentration of needed
nutrients and materials whether it is rutabagas or timber. What is missing in
the ocean is large multicelled plants. Is it because there are no stable
regions where the plants will not be dispersed by wind and waves? If so this
is true over vast geologic time but not on shorter time scales. There is the
Sargasso Sea and the North Pacific Gyre, both stable on the scale of a million
years. There are large multicelled plants that tolerate salt water well such
as mangrove trees and sea grass. Both require shallow seas.
Perhaps a float technology equivalent to pumice would give them the foot hold
that they need to form a mat for stability and tall growth for (Why do trees
grow tall? Is it because we call them brush when they don't?)
I think of this as a task in permaculture. In order to avoid a tremendous
genetic reshaping of a species, it will be necessary to put together a
community of synergistic organisms just so the mangroves can float and hold
together as an island mangal.
An example of a problem that can be tackled on its own is to increase the
range by cross breeding to include tolerance to near freezing conditions. This
could be done by moving genetic material from Acanthus to Avicennia. Since
this is between genera in the same family, it is like moving genetic material
from roses to apples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangrove
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acanthaceae
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acanthus_(genus)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avicennia
Since this is a made up example (involving real genera), it is not likely to
be the best point of attack. It is also just one of 20 or so major problems
that would need to be solved before the mangal would float. With this problem
solved several times for different families in the mangal it would be possible
to have a diverse permaculture up the coasts into temperature climates. Since
I live in Nebraska, it won't be me. I'm having enough fun establishing true
breeding lines of apples and pears with good quality fruit without using
pesticides.
I guess I'll start by countering you, and asking, how do you know
there is a lack of connection to the ocean in societies? Which
societies are most unaware? Which societies are having the most
negative impact on the ocean? Which societies depend the most on the
ocean?
--
Nathan McCorkle
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Frits Stam <f.c....@student.tue.nl> wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> Looking at the way we trash the ocean with plastic, eating all it's fish and
> still think that tropical rain forests are the lungs of the planet seems to
> me that we are in some way disconnected.
I guess my lack of knowledge shows how simple an understanding someone
can have... I'd love to hear more about the topics. Are you interested
in making a movie, or some other media?
> What I am currently interested in is the pollution and degradation of water
> quality close to cities that will eventually end up in the ocean.
>
> A couple of days ago I walked along the river 'de dommel' which goes
> straight through the city. (see: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dommel_(water
> gang) it's in Dutch but it has picture! :P ) They are actually cleaning the
> bed of the river because a lot of companies dumped zinc in it. I am looking
> in ways of collecting samples along the river and assessing the quality.
> While I was biking to the university I could see a purplish reflection on
> the water. I'm wondering how I can check the quality in some kind of way?
A spectrometer may help, know anyone that runs an FTIR?
"other versions may be designed in the future for other purposes : Protei for the North Pacific Plastic garbage patch, "
I like this ROV oil skimmer project. The design could be engineered to be rapidly producible so they could be made in
quantities after a spill happens, since it's not likely we are going to get oil companies stocking thousands
of them in advance:-)
That last sentence may not hold, if the robots proved useful and
effective, it might lower the risk of drilling or transport in some
areas. I know BP has said they want phylogenetic classification of oil
consumers (bacteria, etc) in the waters around the world, so they can
better assess the outcome of an accident.
Err. maybe phylogenetic wasn't appropriate... but they want a survey
of oil consumers done
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Nathan McCorkle <> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, John Griessen <> wrote:
>> I like this ROV oil skimmer project. The design could be engineered to be
>> rapidly producible so they could be made in
>> quantities after a spill happens, since it's not likely we are going to get
>> oil companies stocking thousands
>> of them in advance:-)
>>
>
> That last sentence may not hold, if the robots proved useful and
> effective, it might lower the risk of drilling or transport in some
> areas. I know BP has said they want phylogenetic classification of oil
> consumers (bacteria, etc) in the waters around the world, so they can
> better assess the outcome of an accident.
>
> --
> Nathan McCorkle
> Rochester Institute of Technology
> College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics
There is a big chance that when you were still a kid your parents or friends made you believe that by putting a seashell next to your ear you could hear the ocean. The seashell concept was inspired by this. The concept involves augmenting the natural ocean-like sound with a soundscape created by oceanic data. The accessibility and playfulness of the concept would lead to more awareness on what’s going on in the oceans.
I would love to hear what you think and how you see this.
Questions I still have for myself:
Picture:
Hi Frits,