On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 03:06:00 -0000 (UTC), Recliner wrote:
> 1. What Windows functionality did I lose by installing iTunes?
I already proved, beyond any doubt, you _lose_ functionality with iTunes.
o And you prove, yet again, completely _immune_ to that fact, Recliner.
If you're an adult, Recliner, you'll _comprehend_ that simple fact.
o I gave you the simplest example possible - and you whooshed on it.
How the hell, if you whoosh on the simplest example, am I to provide you
with a more complex example? Think about that fact, Recliner. Please.
Please try to comprehend the _SIMPLE_ example already given, Recliner.
o Otherwise, you're just proving what all apologists incessantly prove.
Until you do 2 things, Recliner, you're just proving you're an apologist.
1. You have to _read_ the facts provided.
2. You have to _comprehend_ the facts provided.
If you like, I will repeat (for the 3rd or 4th) time, the facts, Recliner.
o But you have to do those 2 things, Recliner, if you're NOT an apologist.
1. You have to _read_ the simplest proof I already gave you multiple times
2. You have to _comprehend_ that simplest proof, as an adult should
Adults can do two things, Recliner, you don't seem to be able to do.
o The first is that adults can comprehend basic obvious facts, Recliner.
Only _after_ adults agree on the facts, can adults discuss assessment.
o Note that adults _always_ agree on the facts
Facts are funny that way
o And adults are funny that way.
I already gave you the _simplest_ possible proof! (multiple times!)
o And yet, you don't comprehend even the _simplest_ possible example.
What is so very wrong with you apologists that you can't comprehend fact?
If you don't even own the basic adult cognition skills to comprehend even
the _simplest_ proof, how on earth are you going to have the necessary
increased adult cognitive skills to comprehend the more complex proofs?
You apologists brazenly deny facts outright, and yet, your own statements
prove you didn't comprehend even the _simplest_ of the facts provided.
You brazenly claim that facts aren't facts
o Simply because you didn't even bother to _read_ them.
I repeat the organic traits that make an adult an adult, Recliner:
a. They can comprehend facts
b. Since they're facts, adults always _agree_ on the facts
c. Only _after_ adults agree on the facts, can we discuss assessment
NOTE: Once we _agree_ on the facts, then adults can reasonably and
logically rationally disagree on the _weight_ they place on those facts
when making an assessment of those facts.
But first, adults must agree on the facts - which is a basic adult skill.
o Do you agree that you haven't demonstrated these adult skills yet?
I already gave you (multiple times) the _simplest_ proof possible!
If you don't agree on even the _simplest_ facts, how on earth are you going
to discuss the more complicated facts, Recliner?
*Do you need me to repeat (again!) the _simplest_ proof I provided you?*
o Yes, or no.
(Please pick one.)
--
Apologists brazenly deny facts without even comprehending any of them!