On 15 Jul 2018 05:32:49 GMT, Caver1 wrote:
> Private Internet Access.
> $3.99 per month, unlimited, good amount of servers,. Overall a good VPN.
>
privateinternetaccess.com
I just googled for the OP for this thread, where a bunch of people stated
which VPN they liked best and for what reasons.
Free public VPN in minutes
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/56KgMK6n090/HKhGegCAAQAJ>
As Mike Easter and Shadow brought up in that thread, the problem with
choosing a VPN for someone else is it's sort of like picking a bride for
them.
There are so many things to consider, where, for example, here's the
analysis Mike Easter pointed me to for my favorite VPN service, which is
the vpngate service, but remember, my reasons may be different than the
OP's reasons.
VPN SERVICE VPN Gate
Jurisdiction Based in (Country) Japan
Jurisdiction """Fourteen Eyes"" Country" Cooperative Yellow
Jurisdiction Enemy of the Internet No green
Logging Traffic logs yes red
Logging DNS Requests yes red
Logging Timestamps yes red
Logging Bandwidth yes red
Logging IP Address yes red
Activism Anonymous Payment Method yes green
Activism Accepts Crypto Currency no red
Activism PGP Key Available no red
Activism Gives back to Privacy Causes no red
Activism Meets PrivacyToolsIO Criteria no red
Leak protection 1st Party DNS Servers no red
Leak protection IPv6 Supported / Blocked no red
Protocols Offers OpenVPN yes green
Obfuscation Supports Multihop white
Obfuscation Supports TCP Port 443 yes green
Obfuscation Supports Obfsproxy white
Obfuscation Supports SOCKS white
Obfuscation Supports SSL Tunnel yes green
Obfuscation Supports SSH Tunnel white
Obfuscation Other Proprietary Protocols white
Port blocking Blocks SMTP (Authent.) white
Port blocking Blocks P2P some yellow
Speeds US Server DL Speeds (%) 0.00 white
Speeds International Server DL Speeds (%) 0.00 white
Servers Dedicated or Virtual white
Security Default Provided white
Security Strongest Provided AES-256 green
Security Weakest Provided white
Security Strongest Provided white
Availability # of Simultaneous Connections 25 green
Availability # of Countries 24 green
Availability # of Servers 7,670 green
Support Linux Support (Manual) white (BTW, it works fine on Linux)
Website # of Persistent Cookies 3 yellow
Website # of External Trackers 2 green
Website # of Proprietary API's 1 green
Website Server SSL Rating white
Website SSL Certificate issued to no ssl cert red
Pricing $ / Month - (Annual Pricing) 0.00 green
Pricing $ / Connection / Month 0.00 green
Pricing Free Trial Available Free
Pricing Refund Window (Days) 0 red (huh? It's free. How could that be red?)
Ethics Contradictory Logging Policies white
Ethics Falsely Claims Service is 100% Effective white
Policies Incentivizes social media spam white
Policies Forbids spam white
Policies Requires ethical copy white
Policies Requires full disclosure white
Affiliates Practice ethical copy white
Affiliates Give full disclosure white
While any of the above may be important to the OP, often this is the short
list of the half-dozen things that might be important to most people:
1. Location
2. Encryption
3. Bitcoin payment
4. Protocol (e.g., supports OpenVPN)
5. Logging
6. Price
There is nobody who can recommend the perfect service for the OP if they
don't know what the OP cares about most.
For example, I care most about having 6,000 vpn servers from 50 countries
in my scripts and I don't want to log into anything, nor remember any
passwords, etc., since my environment is script driven.
The OP will certainly have other needs, where, if the OP puts a gun to my
head to choose him a server, I'd tell him to use VpnGate for a few days as
a first girlfriend, just to get the hang of it, but not to do anything
serious - and then - when he's ready for serious action, then use ProtonVPN
for a few months as a first love, and then, once he gets the hang of VPN,
then he would have the knowledge to choose the VPN wife he wants to live
with long term.
PS: That nospam guy is a cowardly bully troll - who can only shoot down
analogies (big deal) but he will never offer any purposefully helpful
advice to the OP and he won't provide references - and - worse - his
unhelpful guesses are almost always wrong (the monkey does better).