Hi Paul,
I was going to finish that and had it half-done, but got overwhelmed with other stuff and it became out of focus. I have much more than that to do, but my capacity is limited. It's still on my list.
Now, what you can do in your work project as a completely valid workaround:
Regarding having you own fork: that's not really necessary, because it's a CherryPy tool you refer to and it's completely extendable and replaceable thing.
All you have to do is to create your own tool the same way and then use it instead. You could register your own toolbox or register that tool to cherrypy.tools namespace.
Once upstream is improved you can get back to use the original tool.
Ref:
https://docs.cherrypy.org/en/latest/extend.html#toolsP.S. Sorry for not getting back to you, sometimes I try to postpone things to get back to them later or they just get lost. Just so you could understand: I currently have 1349 unread github notifications and who-knows-how-many of those from other sources.
P.P.S. Another thing you could do is to encourage others/yourself to share maintenance of project you clearly depend on: we would be really grateful to anyone trying to reduce our load.
Have a nice day and I hope your case will get solved for good!
субота, 21 квітня 2018 р. 17:28:56 UTC+2 користувач Paul Jaros написав: