Please edit/correct/discuss!
-Jodi
GOALS: "fostering communication and sharing among technologists". Some
attention to the "savvy non-geeky" set.
AUDIENCE: Mostly us.
"I see a Code4Lib journal as aimed primarily at the technical library
community, but with a strong secondary audience of the savvy but non-
geeky library set." - Ken Varnum
CONTENT GOAL: Strive for a unique mission. Don't duplicate what other
journals are doing (such as First Monday, Linux Gazette, the old Perl
Journal, A List Apart, and D-Lib). (Jon Gorman: are you looking into
their *content* or their *submission process*?)
DETAILED CONTENT/TOC:
----------------------------------------
*Regular editorial (what's in this issue, etc.)
*News bytes
*Columns holding various perspectives.
**metadata perspective
**coding perspective
**systems perspective
**training/public interface to technology perspective
(Or whatever we think is important)
This would be a way to ensure we touch on each of several areas.
*Articles
**Scholarship
**Implementation
**Technical
**End-user testing
(Might not have one of each each month: we could think about how
important balance is, compared to what's easiest to get.)
*Fun page "which might have some quotes from
in-channel, some jokes, maybe an amusing blog post, and maybe
something that's completely odd."
FORMAT: Electronic-only.
LICENSE: "Something very open"--specifics, anyone?
PEER-REVIEW: No, expect possibly for certain sections. We may revise
our views on peer-review when we're up and running, but for now, the
important thing is to get started. Blind peer-review, in particular,
would be hard in this small a community (or would it?).
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
I still like the idea of a fun page. Nearly every magazine or journal
that I really like either has a lighter-toned "editorial" at the last
page or little cartoons and the like. But if it looks like others are
against it or don't think it's wise I'll go with the group consensus.
I guess I have a hard time seeing how it could turn people off. After
all, you don't have to read that page.
As for the other magazines/online journals. I don't think there's any
concern about duplicating their content. Just by the intersection of
libraries and technology we're likely to have a good deal of unique
content. I'm hoping to look more at what makes those zines/online
journals work so well. If anyone else has any favorite journals that
are primarily digital creatures, I'd encourage them to do the same.
Jon Gorman