I'm confused. Do you mean browser-based wallet or hosted-web wallet? I'm assuming the latter so wanted to confirm.
Not sure what the concern is here? Yes, there is always a risk when you use a third party, but this is hardly something new.
1.8 million wallets on blockchain.info tend to disagree than people are paranoid enough to care that much.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colored Coins" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoinX+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bitc...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
From: Oren Gampel Sent: Saturday, 17 May 2014 12:29 Reply To: bitc...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: please be careful with CoinPrism |
Regarding the exposure to third party: It can sometimes be worth it, considering the fact that managing your keys is still somewhat complex to a simple user. A reliable website can be a better and even safer solution to storing your keys yourself. Again, depending on the geekness level of the end user. I would even argue that "Ordinary users don't know a shit about security" are exactly those who will reach better security with reliable and trusted website (if they can find it), than with their keys stored on their mobile or home desktop...
The launch of coinprism is a major milestone for the coloredcoins community.
In any bitcoin, and bitcoin 2.0 projects, risk disclaimers are generally a good thing - people should always understand the risks.
The CC should support both txn and address based issuance, each has its pros and cons, security vs simplicity.