On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Eric Feight <
ejfe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the response! I thought GPMC seemed like the way to go but I'm
> hitting a big gap in my knowledge here. This whole platform is completely
> new to me. Can you point me to documentation that would show me how to
> implement this, both from a hardware and software standpoint?
> My biggest
> stumbling block at this point is how do I physically build an interface
> between the header connectors on the BeagleBone and the device I'm trying to
> communicate with. Once I have that, I think I can figure out the software
> end of things by looking at GPMC sample code and the device documentation I
> have.
>
>
> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:22:11 PM UTC-5, Gerald wrote:
>>
>> And why is GPMC not an option? What you describe is what the GPMC does.
>> All of these functions should be available to you for use.
>>
>> Gerald
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Eric Feight <
ejfe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am currently looking for a way to connect a BeagleBone to a device
>>> whose interface is described as "comparable to implementing an 8 bit wide
>>> SRAM." It has 12 address lines (A0..A11), 8 data lines (D0..D7), Busy, IRQ,
>>> Output Enable, Write Enable and Chip Enable. Using GPMC doesn't appear to be
>>> an option. I've looked into pin muxing, but these lines do not seem to be
>>> readily available. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gerald
>>
>>
ger...@beagleboard.org
>>
g-co...@ti.com
>>
http://beagleboard.org/
>>
http://circuitco.com/support/
>>