Apologies for cross-posting
Call for papers
We would like to bring the session 'Challenges in
Archaeological Network Science' to your attention. The session will be held at
the Sunbelt Social Network Analysis conference in Brighton on 23-28 June
2015. We welcome all abstracts that address the challenges mentioned in the
session abstract below.
Please ensure to select the session ‘Challenges in
Archaeological Network Science’ during the submission process. Feel free to
notify us if you decide to submit an abstract.
We look forward to meeting you in Brighton,
Termeh Shafie and Tom Brughmans
---
ABSTRACT
Challenges in Archaeological Network
Science
The application of network analysis in archaeology has only
become more common in the last decade, despite a number of pioneering studies in
the 1960s and 70s. The use of different techniques for the analysis and
visualisation of network data has already led to new insights into past human
behaviour. However, this renewed interest in network science is also accompanied
by an increasing awareness of a number of methodological challenges that
archaeological network scientists are faced with. These include, but are not
limited to the following:
– How to deal with spurious
data?
Sampling strategies in archaeology
are often dominated by the geopolitical and financial constraints of excavation
campaigns. Moreover, differences in the preservation of different materials
provide a very fragmented picture of past human behaviour. As a result, networks
constructed from archaeological data can be very sparse with apparent
uncertainties.
– How to introduce more complex
assumptions concerning tie dependency in the reconstruction of archaeological
networks?
Network modelling is based on
hypotheses from archaeological theory which in turn is based on archaeological
evidence. A major challenge is how to infer the structure of an archaeological
network given a set of assumptions regulating the occurrence of ties.
– How to deal with the poor
chronological control of archaeological data?
The contemporaneity of observations
and the exact sequence of events are often uncertain. This is problematic for
network science techniques that assume node contemporaneity or require knowledge
of the order of events.
– How to consider complex
socio-spatial phenomena?
Archaeologists commonly study the
spatial distribution of their data and evaluate to what extent spatial
constraints influenced human behaviour. A limited number of spatial network
techniques are currently available and many of these are not or hardly
applicable in archaeology (e.g. network analysis of road networks).
This session invites papers that
address these or other methodological challenges that network scientists in
archaeology are faced with.
This session is organized by and
will be chaired by: