--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Android Building" mailing list.
To post to this group, send email to android-...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-buildi...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-building?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Building" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-buildi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I’ve put some commit logs up at and http://aosp.changelog.to/KOT49H/KTU84L/ and http://aosp.changelog.to/KTU84L/KTU84M/From what I can tell the chain is 4.4.2_r1 -> 4.4.3_r1 -> 4.4.3_r1.1, and the AOSP changes from 4.4.3_r1 to 4.4.3_r1.1 is just a version bump, so I’m guessing there’s some proprietary code which changed between the two.
+1
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 7:14:24 AM UTC-7, Al Sutton wrote:
I’ve put some commit logs up at and http://aosp.changelog.to/KOT49H/KTU84L/ andhttp://aosp.changelog.to/KTU84L/KTU84M/
FAILED (remote: (InvalidState))
I guess Bootloader 4.18 or 4.23 are broken... also found issue here https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=62198
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Android Building" mailing list.
To post to this group, send email to android-...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-buildi...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-building?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Building" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-buildi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi, thank you for update. I successfully flashed factory images for hammerhead. Things seem much more responsive.
I also have a couple questions. I notice more changes in gcc development on gerrit code review over the past 6 months or so. Is there a new gcc version being used in this update or is the gcc only based on major updates and not maintenance updates? Or does it somewhat follow master branch development? This has always confused me.
My other question, the old kernel source for 4.4.2 works on 4.4.3. But, I'd like to know what changes there are.
Thanks in advance!
Hi, thank you for update. I successfully flashed factory images for hammerhead. Things seem much more responsive.
I also have a couple questions. I notice more changes in gcc development on gerrit code review over the past 6 months or so. Is there a new gcc version being used in this update or is the gcc only based on major updates and not maintenance updates? Or does it somewhat follow master branch development? This has always confused me.
My other question, the old kernel source for 4.4.2 works on 4.4.3. But, I'd like to know what changes there are.
aosp_mako-userdebug:make: *** No rule to make target `otapackage'. Stop.
Is it me doing something wrong or ... ?