The Most Off-Topic Poster?
David Berman
Judge for yourself.
Over a seven-day period beginning May 29:
Chuck: 66
Elvis: 29
Strevel: 27
David: 16
--Best from David in NV
Dutch
"David Berman" <davi...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:DGnoe.904$7s.226@fed1read01...
Congratulations. Chuck is a pile of shit. You are a smaller pile of shit.
You both stink up the place.
Now aren't you proud?
Dutch
PS: How sad is it that instead of doing something fun or constructive, you
spent your time counting Usenet posts and keeping score?
David Berman
news:d7t6k...@news1.newsguy.com...
>
> Dutch
>
> PS: How sad is it that instead of doing something fun or constructive,
you
> spent your time counting Usenet posts and keeping score?
>
Sorry, Bub, but I didn't do the counting; someone who thought it was
important to note did do the counting.
But go ahead and shoot the messenger if you wish.
klmo...@hotmail.com
David Berman wrote:
>
> Sorry, Bub, but I didn't do the counting; someone who thought it was
> important to note did do the counting.
>
> But go ahead and shoot the messenger if you wish.
>
Sure, Dave. Someone else did the counting. You're just the messenger.
Always Be Closing
David has a lot of faults, but up until now I always thought he was at
least honest. Now he's just like Big Mickey but a little smarter.
Dutch
> "Dutch" <PA_D...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:d7t6k...@news1.newsguy.com...
>>
>> Dutch
>>
>> PS: How sad is it that instead of doing something fun or constructive,
> you
>> spent your time counting Usenet posts and keeping score?
>>
>
> Sorry, Bub, but I didn't do the counting; someone who thought it was
> important to note did do the counting.
I see. "Someone" thought this was important but was too ashamed to post it
themself. Fortunately for us, you have no shame and shouldered this burden
to enlighten us. Thank you for showing us the proof that you are a smaller
pile of shit than Chuck.
> But go ahead and shoot the messenger if you wish.
Old Chinese Proverb: "He who throws garbage smells like garbage man."
I think you need to get over it and move on.
Dutch
David Berman
news:1117928672....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Sure, Dave. Someone else did the counting. You're just the messenger.
>
I think he's got it!! By George, he's got it!
Now repeat after me: "The rain in Spain ...." Oh, never mind.
--David/NV
David Berman
> I think you need to get over it and move on.
>
> Dutch
>
Thanks for writing.
Have a great day.
--DAB/NV
David Berman
news:42a23f16...@decaxp.HARVARD.EDU...
> On 4 Jun 2005 16:44:32 -0700, klmo...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> David has a lot of faults, but up until now I always thought he was at
> least honest. Now he's just like Big Mickey but a little smarter.
What is the dishonest part?
That I didn't do the counting? - That would be wrong.
That the count is not accurate for the time span? That would be wrong, too,
or so I'm told.
Thanks for writing. Have a great day.
--David in NV
Dick Goldhaber
I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to know
the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
to do the count.
I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I not
engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
the facts and attack the messenger.
--
DG in Cherry Hill, NJ
videomav...@comcast.net
"Dutch" <PA_D...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:d7te7...@news1.newsguy.com...
Betty Harris
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
"Dick Goldhaber" <video...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bs2dnUzE2fj...@comcast.com...
> Dutch,
>
> I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to
> know
> the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
> to do the count.
I'm retired and never in a million years would I be so lame as to count how
many off topic posts people make. Don't you have ANYTHING better to do?
Who the fuck cares anyway?
> I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
> have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I
> not
> engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
So you post about it now anyway. What about your legal action that caused
you to pass this thrilling info onto David in the first place? You are SUCH
a putz. You just posted about it, nimrod! Why do you allegedly pay that
alleged attorney anyway? All you do is ignore his advice.
Sort of like posting about how damaged you are when someone accuses you of
porking your daughter Danni.......thereby increasing the alleged damage by
cluing in others who missed the first few thousand Dick does Danni posts.
Your Usenet kookiness knows no bounds.
> The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
> the facts and attack the messenger.
There are no facts. No one cares. And you, the messenger, are a Usenet
kook of the highest order. That's the only fact in this thread.
At least Chuck posts about Las Vegas occasionally. He even provides useful
info from time to time. He knows the city. When have you ever offered any
Vegas advice? What is the ratio between your off topic posts and your Vegas
posts? All you post about is your alleged legal action against Chuck (which
is taking 728163785253412 times longer than the MJ trial) and most of those
posts include you saying you can't post about your legal action! And all of
them increase the alleged damage by reminding readers that you are suing
someone because he said you boofed your kid!
Hows that lovely daughter of yours, Dick? I can call you Dick, right?
Please post proof that you are less of an off topic poster than Chuck and
every other regular on this group. I want a total count broken down by
screen name, for the period between 1/1/04 and this date. I want the ratio
of off topic to on topic for each screen name. I want it by time of day and
day of the week. And I want your stats at the top of the list.
That ought to keep him busy for a couple of weeks...............
EGBH
Walt
<davi...@cox.net> wrote:
Try turning the list upside down...
"AVLV's Least Off-Topic Posters"
Posters 1 - 99: less than five off-topic posts
Posters 100 - 199: less than ten off-topic posts
Posters 200 - 299: less than fifteen off-topic posts
Poster 300 - David: 16
Poster 301 - Strevel: 27
Poster 302 - Elvis: 29
Poster 303 - Chuck: 66
Try setting the bar a little higher for yourself.
--- Walt
David Berman
probably a good thing in this case.
--Best from David in NV
"Walt" <no...@none.void> wrote in message
news:040620052212014370%no...@none.void...
CyßerHoGŽ
illustrious company you keep as well.
And you are proud of this accomplishment?
Get over it and move on.
CyßerHoGŽ
>
> I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to
> know
> the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
> to do the count.
>
> I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
> have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I
> not
> engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
>
> The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
> the facts and attack the messenger.
> --
> DG in Cherry Hill, NJ
> videomav...@comcast.net
>
Mr. Goldhaber,
Get a life.
Please.
Walt
<davi...@cox.net> wrote:
> I haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about ...which I sense is
> probably a good thing in this case.
>
> --Best from David in NV
<sigh>
The point is that you do yourself no favors by comparing yourself to
the worst of the worst. You ought to be able to do better than that,
being a smart guy and a trained lawyer and all.
I thought you made an incisive comment the other day when you said
Chuck might possibly be the most insecure person in the world. Yet
this latest thread suggests you wish to vie for that title yourself.
Just like Chuck, every time you gain a little high ground by responding
in a dignified manner or by posting some genuinely useful Vegas
information, you invariably piss it away by reverting to this
schoolyard nonsense. Chuck is quite capable of making himself the
social leper of AVLV. He doesn't need any help from you.
Also, while I'm no defender of Strevel, I don't think it was very nice
of you to take a swipe at him while you're sparring with Chuck.
--- Walt
Rodney C.W.A.J.G.A. King
"David Berman" <davi...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:uOtoe.2435$7s.672@fed1read01...
Dutch
>
> I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to
> know
> the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
> to do the count.
Fine. You created the garbage and Berman threw it. You are both idiots.
> I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
> have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I
> not
> engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
And yet, you respond here.
1) If I were your lawyer I'd smack you in the head. Why do you pay for
legal advice and then ignore it? Your lawyer has a fool for a client.
2) If I were Chuck (assuming there is really a lawsuit) I would take your
post to court as proof that you are stalking him a public forum and defaming
him in private emails.
3) If I were a judge hearing this case, I would find both of you guilty of
frivolously misusing the judicial system and sentence you both to a $10,000
fine and since you have so much spare time in your retirement, 1000 hours
community service.
> The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
> the facts and attack the messenger.
The problem is that you are both idiots. The fact is that you dug up shit
and Berman spread it around. That doesn't make him a messenger, that makes
him a participant.
Dutch
Blah!
Blah!
> I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to know
> the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
> to do the count.
Jesus fuck, you've got to be lonely. Get more women in your life. If
you've got a women, start seeing more on the side or something. I mean,
shit, you're creating statistics for off-topic internet activity.
Playing in traffic is more productive than that.
Oh well, I guess everyone has to find a way to pass "the greatest years
of your life."
Andrew in Alabama
'splain EVERYTHING to your dumn ass???
>I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to know
>the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
>to do the count.
You also had time to do numerous other things, like going outside,
volunteering to help in your community, attending a sporting event,
watching porn, hell, even going to a bar and getting drunk would be
more productive than counting posts on a group to which you don't even
contribute.
Instead you choose to perpetuate this ongoing pointless "war" you have
going with Chuck, using David as your proxy.
>I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
>have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I not
>engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
Why not just use one of your sock-puppets to post it? Surely you have
told your lawyer that you use sock-puppets (and have admitted same?)
>The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
>the facts and attack the messenger.
The FACT is that you are complaining (through your proxy) about
off-topic posting when it has been PROVEN that your own AVLV posts are
98.15% off-topic, and falling fast.
Don't know about New Jersey, but in Alabama we have a word for someone
like that: A first class, unmitigated, 100% HYPOCRITE.
OK, maybe just a 98.15% hypocrite.
On Usenet we also have a name for you: Net-kook. On that one, Dick,
you are 100% for sure.
Andrew <-- is it JUNE yet?
"Keeping my grammar up is real important to me."
"My hands move faster on the keyboard than my brain a lot."
"Your an obvious idiot."
(Don Strevel in alt.vacation.las-vegas)
salmo...@aol.com
> important to note did do the counting.
>
>
The question is, why the f*ck did you decide to be a messenger of this
crap? We know why DG thought it important - he's a deranged loon when
it comes to Chuck. The thing is, the folks who actually read AVLV
*aren't* obsessive idiots. OK?
Honest question here David - what exactly did you think you were
accomplishing by starting this thread? Did you think you were passing
along information that people would be interested in? Did you honestly
think there were people out there wondering exactly how many off topic
posts you and Chuck made last week?
First of all, we aren't complete idiots, OK? We can see the posts you
guys make. If there actually were anybody who cared, they could count
for themselves. Right?
Did you think you were setting the record straight or something? Are
you worried that people would read Chuck's rant about your being the
most off-topic poster and (a) care and (b) be too f*cking stupid to see
for themselves how many posts you guys make.?
Look the only thing this posts could possibly do is heat up the
flame-war games you Chuck play with each other. Either finally admit
you enjoy them, or get some psychological help that would stop you from
starting threads like this.
Sr.
>> the facts and attack the messenger.
EVERBODY HAS SUM SORT A CALLING IN LIFE THEY EXCELL AT...
=SEN0UR TR0UT=
"CyßerHoGŽ" <cybe...@hanginwiththehogs.com> wrote in message
news:T5voe.15649$w21....@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Sr.
IS!!! KNEAD KNOT POST IT!!!
=SEN0UR TR0UT=
"Dick Goldhaber" <video...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bs2dnUzE2fj...@comcast.com...
Sr.
=SEN0UR TR0UT=
"David Berman" <davi...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:DGnoe.904$7s.226@fed1read01...
> Who is AVLV's most off-topic poster?
>
> Judge for yourself.
>
> Over a seven-day period beginning May 29:
>
> Chuck: 66
>
> Elvis: 29
>
> Strevel: 27
>
> David: 16
>
Rodney C.W.A.J.G.A. King
news:8gu5a1d995j3slaqn...@4ax.com...
ChuckK thanks you for your support. Your check and Official Lemmings
Decoder Ring are in the mail.
Don Strevel
--
Many Thanks, :)
Don Strevel, Las Vegas, NV.
http://www.mysecretvegas.com
"Walt" <no...@none.void> wrote in message
news:050620050038297583%no...@none.void...
> In article <uOtoe.2435$7s.672@fed1read01>, David Berman
> <davi...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> I haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about ...which I sense
>> is
>> probably a good thing in this case.
>>
>> --Best from David in NV
>
> <sigh>
>
> The point is that you do yourself no favors by comparing yourself to
> the worst of the worst. You ought to be able to do better than that,
> being a smart guy and a trained lawyer and all.
>
> I thought you made an incisive comment the other day when you said
> Chuck might possibly be the most insecure person in the world. Yet
> this latest thread suggests you wish to vie for that title yourself.
> Just like Chuck, every time you gain a little high ground by responding
> in a dignified manner or by posting some genuinely useful Vegas
> information, you invariably piss it away by reverting to this
> schoolyard nonsense. Chuck is quite capable of making himself the
> social leper of AVLV. He doesn't need any help from you.
> Also, while I'm no defender of Strevel, I don't think it was very nice
> of you to take a swipe at him while you're sparring with Chuck.
No harm done, :). I sit back and read our family newsgroup and enjoy it on
the same fun level as I do "Moe, Curley and Shemp". :)
Dutch
"Chuck.K" <no...@nohow.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d0c3e423...@news.easynews.com...
> In article <d7te7...@news1.newsguy.com>, PA_D...@comcast.net
> says...
>
>> I see. "Someone" thought this was important but was too ashamed to post
>> it
>> themself.
>
>
>> Fortunately for us, you have no shame and shouldered this burden
>> to enlighten us. Thank you for showing us the proof that you are a
>> smaller
>> pile of shit than Chuck.
>
Think again. In the newsgroup dung-heap, you are the biggest pile of shit.
Now go make your mortgage payment, loser. While you are at it, pay your
taxes too.
Dutch
tom ronson
> Lawsuit was over months ago......
Wait a second --- DICK says the suit is still on. Who should I believe.
What's going on here!!
> OH.... you mean the DEAF girl who can no only HEAR, but listens to
> the RADIO and carries on full bore conversations with people.
Curious, does she listen to the radio as the dog is providing relief from
life's stresses, or just while she's having conversations?
You know this is all so confusing.
--tr
................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
tom ronson
news:bs2dnUzE2fj...@comcast.com...
> I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to
know
> the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
> to do the count.
What "information"? What "facts" Some slanted ball of crap that you think is
'research'? What was the criteria used for this "report"? Why did you choose
the dates you did? Why did you send it to David ---- did you figure he'd be
willing to step on his DICK for you?
DICK, no matter the venue you're a f*cking loser.
> I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
> have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I
not
> engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
And this helps your imaginary case how?
> The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
> the facts and attack the messenger.
Besides have zero "facts" attacking the messenger is pretty easy with you
two involved.
--tr
(bet you wished your note went as email, as you thot it had)
tom ronson
news:DGnoe.904$7s.226@fed1read01...
> Who is AVLV's most off-topic poster?
I'd guess you and the beaner.
> Judge for yourself.
I read the list and come away thinking about criteria. Hell, the beaner
likely posted 29 threads in the accusatory 'Chuck didn't pay taxes' thread
alone. Then when I see that DICK is your guiding light I've gotta admit that
the word 'pretty fucking lame' came to mind.
David, this is like your cuntail waitress story a few months ago ---- where
you tossed your thot against the wall, then watched it drool to the floor
like the slim that it was.
Sorry, but this was as pathetic as it gets. IMCO.
--tr
tom ronson
> As a "reporter", NOT doing your own research.
ding, ding, ding. And without a fact checker to come along behind to ---- oh
lets just say, check facts, the reporter would have to be fired for this
one.
David Berman
>
> I don't START off topic posts.
>
Sometimes you do and sometimes you don't.
What you DO excel in, without serious competition, is taking someone else's
on-topic post and steering it off topic with a completely off-topic reply so
that you can use the thread to attack the original poster or someone else
who has replied in the thread, usually without commenting at all on the
subject of the thread.
If you think that doesn't make you the most-off-topic poster on AVLV, then
you are living in dreamland, you naive, insecure man-child.
Ronald Emerson
killfiled us and never sees our posts unless someone quotes our posts in
their posts. Of course I have never posted anything that doe's not
relate to Vegas anyway.
Ronald Emerson
Sr.
WELL SIR, MY OPINION OF HIM JUST DROPPED ANOTHER NOTCH-'TOTALLEE OFF THE
CHART!! COME TO THINK OF IT, I DONUT RECALL SEEING ANY NON VEGAS RELATED
POSTING FROM YOU RONNIE!!!
=SEN0UR TR0UT=
"Ronald Emerson" <nort...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7407-42A...@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net...
billb
>
realistically, adding women to your life, on an ongoing basis, multiplies
your problems by a factor of 16.
> DICKy has all the "woman" he needs.......
tough call.
who knows what that level of woman would be. i would love to have an
endless supply of fecund females to inseminate. so would most men. chuck
is an exception.
--
billb
I went soul searching and found nothing.
"
spenc...@attbi.com
Chuck.K wrote:
> In article <42a34730$0$6552$a826...@news.titannews.com>,
> madscr...@yahoo.com says...
> You better stop this Ronson, or I may actually have to buy you a
> drink.
>
>
> Chuck
Chuck part with $4.00. BAHAHAHAHAHA. Never happen.
hehate...@hotmail.com
dress"!
--EE--
spenc...@attbi.com
Big Mikey
Tried to send you private email but it bounces. Please send me your email
address. Got some nice pictures for you.
LOL!
Is is JUNE yet? YOU BET YOUR ASS IT IS YOU AVLV ASSHOLES!
June, thinking June.
"Sr." <tr...@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:yLednXLDgpa...@comcast.com...
Big Mikey
So am I....
Big Mikey
"Andrew in Alabama" <andr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8gu5a1d995j3slaqn...@4ax.com...
> Damb, "Dick Goldhaber" <video...@nospam.comcast.net>, do I have to
> 'splain EVERYTHING to your dumn ass???
>
>>I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to
>>know
>>the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
>>to do the count.
>
> You also had time to do numerous other things, like going outside,
> volunteering to help in your community, attending a sporting event,
> watching porn, hell, even going to a bar and getting drunk would be
> more productive than counting posts on a group to which you don't even
> contribute.
>
> Instead you choose to perpetuate this ongoing pointless "war" you have
> going with Chuck, using David as your proxy.
>
>>I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
>>have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I
>>not
>>engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
>
> Why not just use one of your sock-puppets to post it? Surely you have
> told your lawyer that you use sock-puppets (and have admitted same?)
>
>>The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
>>the facts and attack the messenger.
>
> The FACT is that you are complaining (through your proxy) about
> off-topic posting when it has been PROVEN that your own AVLV posts are
> 98.15% off-topic, and falling fast.
>
> Don't know about New Jersey, but in Alabama we have a word for someone
> like that: A first class, unmitigated, 100% HYPOCRITE.
>
> OK, maybe just a 98.15% hypocrite.
>
> On Usenet we also have a name for you: Net-kook. On that one, Dick,
> you are 100% for sure.
>
> Andrew <-- is it JUNE yet?
>
>
> "Keeping my grammar up is real important to me."
> "My hands move faster on the keyboard than my brain a lot."
> "Your an obvious idiot."
> (Don Strevel in alt.vacation.las-vegas)
Big Mikey
I have not forgotten about the pictures, DG. Hang in there and just laugh
at fatass Chuck and buttboy Andrew. Forget lawsuits and courtrooms, being a
legal stalker is much more fun. And I can soon do it in all 50 states.
Dick, trust me my good friend, it takes time, but Chuck will eventually get
his due...I'll put my life on it.
Big Mikey
(and yes Chuckie, I will even give you my company name once I am finshed
with the bonding and licensing, etc. Something you know nothing about,
loser. But I will give credit to Andrew, he knows all about Attorney
Services and Bail Bondsman.)
Was it DOC that said don't mess with Big Mikey?
"Dick Goldhaber" <video...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bs2dnUzE2fj...@comcast.com...
> Dutch,
>
> I gave David the information because I thought people were entitled to
> know
> the facts when Chuck makes an accusation, and being retired I had the time
> to do the count.
>
> I would certainly not be ashamed to write the post myself, but because I
> have a pending legal action against Chuck my lawyer would prefer that I
> not
> engage him, and thus I passed the information I had gathered to David.
>
> The problem is, Dutch, that you have chosen, as David suggested, to ignore
> the facts and attack the messenger.
> --
> DG in Cherry Hill, NJ
> videomav...@comcast.net
>
> "Dutch" <PA_D...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:d7te7...@news1.newsguy.com...
>>
>> "David Berman" <davi...@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:Qzqoe.2409$7s.548@fed1read01...
>> > "Dutch" <PA_D...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:d7t6k...@news1.newsguy.com...
>> >>
>> >> Dutch
>> >>
>> >> PS: How sad is it that instead of doing something fun or
>> >> constructive,
>> > you
>> >> spent your time counting Usenet posts and keeping score?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Sorry, Bub, but I didn't do the counting; someone who thought it was
>> > important to note did do the counting.
>>
>>
>> I see. "Someone" thought this was important but was too ashamed to post
> it
>> themself. Fortunately for us, you have no shame and shouldered this
> burden
>> to enlighten us. Thank you for showing us the proof that you are a
> smaller
>> pile of shit than Chuck.
>>
Big Mikey
Big Mikey
:)
"Chuck.K" <no...@nohow.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d0ea0616...@news.easynews.com...
> In article <ed4c0$42a44f4c$42f83933$13...@DIALUPUSA.NET>,
> sevenou...@yahoo.com says...
>
>> realistically, adding women to your life, on an ongoing basis, multiplies
>> your problems by a factor of 16.
>
> Well, THAT certainly explains YOUR inability to get LAID!
>
>> who knows what that level of woman would be. i would love to have an
>> endless supply of fecund females to inseminate. so would most men.
>> chuck
>> is an exception.
>
> Yeah...... I only need ONE woman..... and thankfully, I have her.
>
>
> Chuck
> www.cliffyberman.com (coming again soon)
> www.davidinlv.com (coming again soon)
>
> Sometimes you gotta go, where every Claven is insane!
> Where every Cliffy post spawns flames
> You gotta be where you can see, that Berman is still inane
> You gotta be where Cliffy is still insane!
>
> Cliffy Berman... the most OFF TOPIC poster in avlv.
Big Mikey
That's MISTER Big Mikey to you, buster.
Dave is just a guy who tries to find usefulness in the feces of the AVLV.
I just wipe them away...
Big Mikey
"David Berman" <davi...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:qWroe.2423$7s.694@fed1read01...
> "Always Be Closing" <alwaysbecl...@comcast.nut> wrote in message
> news:42a23f16...@decaxp.HARVARD.EDU...
>> On 4 Jun 2005 16:44:32 -0700, klmo...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> David has a lot of faults, but up until now I always thought he was at
>> least honest. Now he's just like Big Mickey but a little smarter.
>
> What is the dishonest part?
>
> That I didn't do the counting? - That would be wrong.
>
> That the count is not accurate for the time span? That would be wrong,
> too,
> or so I'm told.
>
> Thanks for writing. Have a great day.
>
> --David in NV
>
>
Big Mikey
taxes and impounds account he was forced to set up for next years taxes.
It is AMAZING what I can learn about fattass these days...
Big Mikey
<spenc...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:1118408020....@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Big Mikey
Big Mikey
<hehate...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118435621....@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Big Mikey
Lynne and fatass DO NOT SLEEP TOGETHER.
Ok, Fatass, prove I am wrong. Post ONE picture of Lynne and YOU, liar!
It is F$$# amazing what process servers can do these days....
Big Mikey
<spenc...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:1118436365.6...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> The Cheap Bastard.
>
itsucks2...@yahoo.com
Big Mikey wrote:
> Geez...gone for a few weeks and nothing changes...
You sure haven't................ Thats why it really sucks to be you.
>
> I have not forgotten about the pictures, DG. Hang in there and just laugh
> at fatass Chuck and buttboy Andrew. Forget lawsuits and courtrooms, being a
> legal stalker is much more fun. And I can soon do it in all 50 states.
>
> Dick, trust me my good friend, it takes time, but Chuck will eventually get
> his due...I'll put my life on it.
What life would that be? You have no life...................Thats why
it really sucks to be you.
>
> Big Mikey
>
> (and yes Chuckie, I will even give you my company name once I am finshed
> with the bonding and licensing, etc. Something you know nothing about,
> loser. But I will give credit to Andrew, he knows all about Attorney
> Services and Bail Bondsman.)
>
> Was it DOC that said don't mess with Big Mikey?
Everyone here messes with you.............Thats why it really sucks to
be you.
itsucks2...@yahoo.com
Big Mikey wrote:
> Big Mickey?
>
> That's MISTER Big Mikey to you, buster.
>
> Dave is just a guy who tries to find usefulness in the feces of the AVLV.
>
> I just wipe them away...
>
YOU ARE THE FECES OF AVLV. Thats
why....................................
It really and I mean REALLY
SUCKS 2 BE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
itsucks2...@yahoo.com
Big Mikey wrote:
> And a liar too.
>
> Lynne and fatass DO NOT SLEEP TOGETHER.
>
> Ok, Fatass, prove I am wrong. Post ONE picture of Lynne and YOU, liar!
>
Sad really SAD.............. Why don't you post what you promised?
I guess thats why it really and I mean REALLY.....................
SUCKS 2 BE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Roger Masarsky
<mike...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>And he doesn't live with her. We got proof.
But of course you won't provide that proof, just like those photos of
you and the mayor never materialized.
What do you gain by lying? The truth is often better.
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
"Big Mikey" <mike...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5Xoqe.10386$qr.5500@fed1read06...
> Trout:
>
> Tried to send you private email but it bounces. Please send me your email
> address. Got some nice pictures for you.
>
> LOL!
>
> Is is JUNE yet? YOU BET YOUR ASS IT IS YOU AVLV ASSHOLES!
>
> June, thinking June.
Just what idiotic set of behaviors are you supposed to be performing in
"June", anyway?
Do you ask Strebel to breakfast for the gazillionth time and then spew on
him after the last slice of pepperoni is gone?
Do you grab and then eat your own dingleberries in the Omaha Lounge?
Do you wipe a green booger on your lip and leave it there all day?
Do you take the sock you use as a masturbation receptacle and rub it on your
cat?
Do you fart in line at Picasso, then laugh and admit to a revolted crowd
that you couldn't afford to eat there in a million years?
Just what lame activity will you claim to have done? Especially when
everyone knows you never do anything?
What? What is it?
God, what a retahd.
EGBH
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
> Dick, trust me my good friend,
Oh great, now he's posting conversations between himself and his
weiner...............
EGBH
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
> Big Mickey?
>
> That's MISTER Big Mikey to you, buster.
>
> Dave is just a guy who tries to find usefulness in the feces of the AVLV.
>
> I just wipe them away...
And then spread them on Wonderbread.
3 posts so far and he's already talking to his weiner and wiping his
ass.................
You do remember that literally everyone here knows with absolute certainty
that you are the lamest retahd on the planet, right?
EGBH
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
> And he doesn't live with her. We got proof.
And this would interest ANYONE because.................?
EGBH
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
> And a liar too.
>
> Lynne and fatass DO NOT SLEEP TOGETHER.
>
> Ok, Fatass, prove I am wrong. Post ONE picture of Lynne and YOU, liar!
>
> It is F$$# amazing what process servers can do these days....
Its amazing how you think ANYONE gives the smallest, tiniest shit about
anything you say or do............you are nothing but a, well, nothing.
EGBH
Big Mikey
Big Mikey
"Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" <Dav...@crestviewcable.com> wrote in message
news:hiqqe.771$D83....@eagle.america.net...
Big Mikey
Big Mikey
<itsucks2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118448257.8...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Big Mikey
Big Mikey
"Roger Masarsky" <rogerm44...@earthlink.nut> wrote in message
news:42ab2e1...@decaxp.HARVARD.EDU...
Big Mikey
That's OK. I hate the place too.
Big Mikey
"Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" <Dav...@crestviewcable.com> wrote in message
news:koqqe.775$D83....@eagle.america.net...
Roger Masarsky
<mike...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Getting board in Oregon, huh?
That's awesome. Way to make that "education" pay off.
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
> So are you, Toad.
So am I what?
This idiot can't even quote and reply with a coherent sentence.
Of course everyone already knew that............
EGBH
Cathy Whiteperson
And just how far does that stick go up yer ass?...........
I would suppose it makes bowel movements difficult.
Anyway, if you need help with that, I know a great recipe for a Maalox
cocktail....
And I said Maalox, not Maltov, Maalox.
We used to give it to the old people when they were irregular.
heh heh
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
> Getting board in Oregon, huh?
>
> That's OK. I hate the place too.
"Board"?
I thought there wasn't any lumber industry anymore, at least according to
you. Then I wonder how they broke a board feet record this year?
Am I supposed to be upset that you don't like a state? LOL........
I happen to love it here; sunny, insanely beautiful, super friendly people,
no traffic, no crime, unbelievable wildlife everywhere, especially on my
property, no morons like you..........
Now, if you were thinking (there's a laugh) that I might be "bored", hardly.
I'm very busy working on my house and am starting a landscape project, in
addition to pursuing my many other interests. This what normal people do,
instead of pretending to have some gossip about another grown man or men or
women or whatever nonsense you're peddling this week to a bunch of people
who dislike and disrepect you in addition to not caring about you. You are
nothing more than a mildly amusing internet joke that people bag on during
their daily 10 minutes on AVLV. You are literally nothing, but it is fun
exposing you every now and then (not that you don't do that quite well
yourself. Have you shown Dick your wiener yet? I bet he's all excited to
see it!).
Oh, and remember, I'm well off enough to have retired at a very young age,
own my home and property outright, and have enough to live on for the rest
of my life without ever having to work for the man ever again.
You? Pretending to have friends, still slaving away at some job you're
terrible at, and making a total ass of yourself in front of hundreds if not
thousands of strangers. WOW! Trout and Strebel are your pals! What an
accomplishment!
A *board* is smarter than those retahds................
EGBH
fx...@bellatlantic.net
> T
>
> Is is JUNE yet? YOU BET YOUR ASS IT IS YOU AVLV ASSHOLES!
>
> June, thinking June.
>
>
Denny in Mass
Everybody's Gonna Be Happy
<fx...@bellatlantic.net> wrote in message news:Srtqe.769$Nx1.340@trndny05...
June Cleaver, think June Cleaver.
EGBH
tom ronson
> Is is JUNE yet? YOU BET YOUR ASS IT IS YOU AVLV ASSHOLES!
yaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwn.
How's that photo of you and your pal the mayor coming along? film developed
yet?
Oh, and what's it say about YOU if you knowingly hang out with "assholes"?
--tr
................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
spenc...@attbi.com
Big Mikey wrote:
> Spencer, buy Ronson his Mountian Dew and give fatass $4.00 towards the new
> taxes and impounds account he was forced to set up for next years taxes.
>
> It is AMAZING what I can learn about fattass these days...
>
> Big Mikey
That explains why he has to Drive an Altima. An Altima.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, oh yea an Altima!!!!!!!!!!!
So he drives an Altima, Buys $35 wedding dress, Can't pay his house
Real Estate Taxes. Gets hit with hundreds of dollars in interest and
panalties. And he drives an Altima!!!!!! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
hehate...@hotmail.com
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAA
--EE--
hehate...@hotmail.com
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
--EE--
rayrat
What's wrong with driving an Altima?
Really, Big, you are becoming tiresome.
Rayrat
normzauchin
Ray, you seem like a good guy but you have to get a clue to get the
Altima joke.
rayrat
wrote:
I guess expecting las vegas info from this group put me in a different
fram of mind than an "Altima" joke.
Ray
Big Mikey
No problem.
Big Mikey
"tom ronson" <madscr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42ab0383$0$6543$a826...@news.titannews.com...
Big Mikey
Got to admit, I will miss you, David.
Big Mikey
"David Berman" <davi...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:uOtoe.2435$7s.672@fed1read01...
>I haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about ...which I sense is
> probably a good thing in this case.
>
> --Best from David in NV
>
>
> "Walt" <no...@none.void> wrote in message
> news:040620052212014370%no...@none.void...
>> In article <DGnoe.904$7s.226@fed1read01>, David Berman
>> <davi...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Who is AVLV's most off-topic poster?
>> >
>> > Judge for yourself.
>> >
>> > Over a seven-day period beginning May 29:
>> >
>> > Chuck: 66
>> >
>> > Elvis: 29
>> >
>> > Strevel: 27
>> >
>> > David: 16
>> >
>> > --Best from David in NV
>> >
>> >
>> Try turning the list upside down...
>>
>> "AVLV's Least Off-Topic Posters"
>>
>> Posters 1 - 99: less than five off-topic posts
>> Posters 100 - 199: less than ten off-topic posts
>> Posters 200 - 299: less than fifteen off-topic posts
>> Poster 300 - David: 16
>> Poster 301 - Strevel: 27
>> Poster 302 - Elvis: 29
>> Poster 303 - Chuck: 66
>>
>> Try setting the bar a little higher for yourself.
>>
>> --- Walt
>
>
Big Mikey
pump.
Maybe Lynne wakes up with someone in Chino, but it sure ain't with you.
Chuck, you are a liar. I know it and YOU know it. You are correct about
your two homes (LV and Chino) but you leave out a lot of other information.
This silliness is getting old and tiresome Chuck, but as I dig up more and
more information LEGALLY on you, it gets more and more interesting.
Big Mikey
"Chuck.K" <no...@nohow.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d142a6c6...@news.easynews.com...
> In article <Mkpqe.10394$qr.3532@fed1read06>, mike...@hotmail.com
> says...
>> And a liar too.
>
> YES, you have continually been proven to be "a LIAR".
>
>> Lynne and fatass DO NOT SLEEP TOGETHER.
>
> ....... We DON'T?
>
> Then, WHO is that lovely lady I wake up next to?
>
>> Ok, Fatass, prove I am wrong. Post ONE picture of Lynne and YOU, liar!
>
> I believe Maggy did that almost 4 YEARS ago! Oh wait..... no... I
> take that back. Maggy gave it to CLIFFY, who was more than willing
> to post it.
>
> But, if you REALLY want another one, I'll be HAPPY to post one......
> immediately AFTER you post a scan of ANYTHING showing you own a home
> in Las Vegas. That ought to be EASY for someone as computer
> illiterate as YOU seem to be.
>
>> It is F$$# amazing what process servers can do these days....
>>
>> PPPORTLYPUSSY Masarsky
>
> "Process servers"?
>
> BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA
>
> You should talk to DICKy about "process servers", since the lame one
> his lame ass attorney hired to serve me wound up serving the next
> door NEIGHBOR's daughter.
>
> Ooops..... did I just give away one of the reasons WHY DICKy's case
> got thrown out of court? Me BAD!
>
> --
>
> Mike, Mike, Mike,
>
> I have yet to discover what you are wonderful at, but you are an
> absolute jackass when it comes to human relations. And I say that with
> all due respect, which is zero.
>
>
> I built my business from scratch, literally zero working capital, and
> in a few short years I have a developed a substantial and extremely
> loyal customer base. That deals with the initial part of your post
> which is, as usual, bullshit.
>
>
> But since the cat is out of the bag and you've chosen to attack my
> business acumen perhaps this is a good time for me to retaliate and
> say what has been on my, and many others', minds.
>
>
> How many times have you posted here that "those who have met me will
> say (fill in the accolades here)". Have you ever noticed that, with
> the exception of Don Strevel, nobody who has met you has ever chimed
> in to defend you. Perhaps you haven't noticed, but I have. The reason
> for that is simple; we had chosen not to participate in a dogpile that
> was not going in your favor. Notice the "had", as in past tense. We
> have obviously decided to change our positions and it seems I may be
> the last holdout from the elite group of people who have "met you".
>
>
> That having been said, here goes.
> I have met some boring, boorish and obnoxious people in my time. I'm
> not prepared to crown you as the "most" in the above categories but
> you have such consistently high marks in all of them that you have
> definitely cracked in to the top 5. Try as I might I cannot recall the
> other 4, but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt.
>
>
> Let me recount for the reading public my own personal experience and
> opinion of you. We met for the first time at an Andrew event and you
> spent most of the conversation talking about yourself. Not unusual
> since a review of your posts all contain multiple references to me, I
> and myself. Strange habits for someone who claims to not care what the
> rest of us think of you.
>
>
> (Sidebar: Citing the fact that you have relatives in the armed forces
> as an example of why you are a badass was freaking laughable. My dad
> was a drill sgt in the Marines, that doesn't make me a badass.
> Unrelated to my current rant but a classic example of the enormity of
> your jackassitude).
>
>
> Where was I. Oh yes, despite the fact that we held a fairly
> protracted, yet entirely un-scintillating, conversation at the first
> event, when I walked up to you and extended my hand at the next event
> a few months later you didn't recognize me and even asked if we had
> ever met before. In and of itself a non-issue. Taken as a whole with
> the rest of your boorish behavior, quite telling indeed.
>
>
> You met my wife at this years soiree. Not realizing that holding a cup
> of water under your armpit may have some level of unexpected (or
> perhaps obvious to the rest of us) consequences you shook her hand.
> She is short, 4' 10", you are not. You leaned over to shake her hand,
> gravity did its thing and you poured water on her leg and dress shoes.
> We're polite, we didn't say anything. Still wouldn't have said
> anything until I read the post I'm responding to now.
>
>
> Goddamn you are a jackass. Re-read the way you started your response
> to me and see if you can convince me otherwise.
>
>
> (Sidebar: Since we are on the subject of my wife, it's considered
> inappropriate to comment about Filipinas and make reference to their
> sexual attitudes as you did in an earlier post a few days ago. If you
> knew anything about the people of the Phils you would know that they
> are in fact very religious, very conservative, very modest and very
> old-school by American standards.)
>
>
> But I digress. Shall I continue. Thank you, I will.
>
>
> The next bit of wife-related boorishness reads as follows:
>
>
> The Soiree is a non-AVLV event that is attended by some of the
> regulars here. We have an unspoken rule to minimize if not eliminate
> all discussion of the goings on here at AVLV. Even the mysterious
> Chuck personae has not in the past pierced that veil, that implied
> contract among friends.
>
>
> That contract went out the window this time and it was all about you
> baby. I believe it was at that event that I first uttered the infamous
> words to one Mr. Andrew from Alabama "Never having met Chuck, I would
> rather spend an hour of conversation with him over drinks than another
> 5 minutes with Mike".
>
>
> To be fair to the group we were not discussing your behavior in the
> context of what goes on here, but rather in the context of your
> behavior at the event. Any discussion of your behavior here was purely
> ancillary embellishment.
>
>
> Clue number 1. Andy and I are pretty good friends. It's okay, within
> reason, for me to rib him about his profession and place of residence.
> It's okay for him to rib me about my profession and avocations.
> However, I have enough people skills to know that it is not okay to
> go up to his wife after just meeting her and slamming her husband, his
> profession and his place of residence. You lack those basic skills and
> committed yet another major social gaffe. That was the source I
> believe of the Mikey related conversations that followed.
>
>
> I promised more wife-related boorishness and so you shall have it dear
> readers:
>
>
> Again, the Soiree is not an AVLV event. My wife, in an attempt to make
> polite small talk with you, asked where you live. (I think the rest of
> you guys can see where this is going). That is a perfectly appropriate
> and innocent question to ask at an event that is attended mostly by
> out-of-towners. Upon asking those sacred words "Where do you live" my
> wife quickly looked at me with eyes that said "Why is this guy
> freaking out?". Your reaction to the question was as predictable as
> it was hysterical. You threw your head back in frustration and the
> tone of your voice raised (slightly) as you started pronouncing "I
> keep telling you people, I live at the Lakes. In Las Vegas Nevada.
> mutter..mutter...muttter".
>
>
> I forgot the rest as I had to quickly start 'splaining to my wife why
> you were having such an intense reaction to a simple question. I then
> had to 'splain to you that not everyone at this event is going to be
> up to speed on your little online soap opera, you fucking moron.
>
>
> (Clarification: I didn't say fucking moron at the time. Please read
> the above sentence as <past tense> I then had to 'splain to you that
> not everyone at this event is going to be up to speed on your little
> online soap opera,</past tense> <present tense> you fucking moron.
> </present tense>
>
>
> Apropos of nothing but humorous nonetheless, I recall Andrew and I
> mutually 'splaining to you that your little problems here at AVLV were
> problems of your own making and that it was in fact your actions that
> had caused things to escalate to the point that they had. You used as
> your primary excuse the "fact" that gpinlv had emailed you and
> "threatened your kids". You said it with such emphasis and sincerity
> that I had no choice but to respond "I didn't even know you had kids".
>
>
> To your credit you immediately admitted that you don't have kids.
> Which allows me to segue quite nicely into:
>
>
> Clue 2: You can't threaten someone who doesn't exist.
>
>
> Let me give you an example; Andrew, I'm going to kill your uncle.
>
>
> That's not a threat. I don't even know if Andrew has an uncle. If he
> does, I don't know who he is or where he lives. I don't have the means
> to locate, travel to or kill his uncle.
>
>
> If Andrew decides to take the sentence above as a legitimate threat
> than he is as loony as you are. He's not. I've met Andrew. I like
> Andrew. I've met you. I've tolerated you with ambivalence until now.
> The humongous jackassery of your opening salvo has pushed me squarely
> into the "I dislike you" camp.
>
>
> In fact, upon further reflection you have moved quite decidedly in to
> the top 3 most obnoxious, boorish, and boring people I have ever met.
> For the life of me, I still can't remember the other 2.
>
>
> Clue 3: This one is a visual and may require some thinking.
>
>
> You showed up at the Pickadillos show a few weeks ago. I sat at your
> table and we made some small talk. When you tried to swing the
> conversation over to AVLV (specifically the Pond Scum incident) I gave
> you <clue starts here> immediate visual cues that I was not interested
> in the conversation.</clue ends here>. When you again tried to steer
> the conversation to AVLV I gave you <clue starts here> immediate
> visual cues that I was not interested in the conversation.</clue ends
> here>.
>
>
> The third time (in maybe four minutes) when you again tried to steer
> the conversation to AVLV I <REALLY BIG ASS FUCKING CLUE THAT EVEN A
> JACKASS OF THE HIGHEST ORDER SUCH AS YOURELF, WRITTEN IN CHUCKESQUE
> ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS STARTS HERE> told you that I have to "go mingle"
> and left your presence</REALLY BIG ASS FUCKING CLUE THAT EVEN A
> JACKASS OF THE HIGHEST ORDER SUCH AS YOURELF, WRITTEN IN CHUCKESQUE
> ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS ENDS HERE>.
>
>
> Allow me to translate:
>
>
> Original phrase: "I have to go mingle"
>
>
> In Popeye Speak: "I've hads all I can stands and I can't stands no
> more".
>
>
> In Spanish: Que es la chingadera problema con este jackassisimo?"
>
>
> In American Sign Language: " "
>
>
> In the language of someone with the slightest modicum of people
> skills: "Ok. I've tried to be polite but you've given me two choices.
> I can be rude and correctly identify you as a clueless jackass of
> gargantuan proportions, or I can politely excuse myself and remove
> myself from your offensive presence. I'll choose the latter".
>
>
> Again I am compelled to remind you to read your opening statement to
> me and attempt to comprehend how much of an asshole you really have to
> be to write such a thing. You have just moved into the position of one
> of the two most obnoxious, boring and boorish people I have ever had
> the distinct displeasure to have met. I still cannot for the life of
> me recall who the other guy is, but I sure feel sorry for him.
>
>
> While I take a few minutes to adjust the tote board I would like to
> post for you, unedited, the classic reaming that one Mr Al Pacino gave
> to Kevin Spacey as Ricky Roma in the fantastic film Glengarry Glen
> Ross. Please adjust the following verbiage as necessary and apply to
> yourself:
>
>
> You stupid fucking cunt. You, Williamson, I'm talking to you shithead.
> You just cost me six thousand dollars. That's right. Six thousand
> dollars and one Cadillac. What are you going to do about it? What are
> you going to do about it, asshole? You're fucking shit! Where did you
> learn your trade you stupid fucking cunt, you idiot?! Whoever told you
> that you could work with men?! Oh, I'm gonna have your job. I'm going
> downtown, I'm talk to Mitch and Murray, I am going to Limkin! I don't
> care who you know, whose nephew you are or who's dick you're suckin
> on, you're going out! I swear to you, you're going out! Anyone in this
> office lives on his wits. What you are hired for is to help us. Does
> that seem clear to you? To help us, not to fuck us up. To help men who
> are going out there to try to earn a living, you fairy, you company
> man. I'll tell you something else. I hope you ripped the joint off, I
> could tell our friend here a little something might help him to catch
> you. You wanna learn the first rule you'd know if you ever spent a day
> in your life? You never open your mouth till you know what the shot
> is. You fucking child.
>
>
> I'm back.
>
>
> Let's shift our focus now to AVLV and why we all (with the exception
> of Mr Strevel) think you are more than worthy of a swift and thorough
> Jackassasination. You are completely full of shit. Not only are you a
> liar, but you're a bad one at that. As Mr Roma said, don't open your
> mouth till you know what the shot is.
>
>
> You stated quite plainly that "residency takes a year in the state of
> Nevada". That is in fact the only piece of the voluminous amount of
> bullshit that I have ever challenged you on. I offered you the
> opportunity to prove for the first time that you have the slightest
> clue what you are talking about. I asked you what I have to do to
> "file my residency" in the state of Nevada. You sidestepped
> publically by saying "I thought we talked about that at the Soiree"
> and privately emailed me to see if I wanted to have breakfast with
> you.
>
>
> So once again you have an opportunity to save some face and post here,
> for the record, what does one have to do to "file for residency" in
> Nevada. You claimed that it takes a year and that you were going to
> do it a few weeks ago. It should be a simple and straightforward
> question that you can answer, unless of course you are just a full of
> shit jackass of near monolithic proportions.
>
>
> Damn. I forgot another Mike story that emphasizes his ever widening
> range of boorishness. Here goes. 'splanation to follow:
>
>
> In an attempt to somehow swing the conversation away from Mike and all
> things Mike, I made an attempt to tell him of one of my long term
> plans. That plan is to develop a piece of land in a very remote
> location and spend a good deal of my life living at the edge of the
> wilderness, hunting, fishing and playing music at sunset.
>
>
> "Big Mikey" immediately tried to shoot down the idea and blustered
> profusely about all the buddies he's had who've tried to live in the
> ountry and came crawling back to the city in less than a year.
> <Clue starts here>
>
>
> I spent my entire young life living in the country. I spent 9 years
> living in a logging town with a population of 52 people. I used to
> play music and perform magic and dream someday of coming to Las Vegas
> and performing here. I do that now. That dream came true without me
> even realizing it was happening.
>
>
> In my thirties I lived in a beautiful log cabin by the Russian River.
> My business travels would sometimes put me in New York City one
> weekend, back to the cabin in the woods during the week, followed up
> by backpacking in the Trinity Alps the following weekend. I just
> happen to have the ability to function well in different environments.
>
>
> As Mr Roma said, don't open your mouth till you know what the shot is.
> You didn't know what the shot was Mike and you opened your mouth.
> Eventually returning to the wilderness is not a new experience for me,
> it's a homecoming.
>
>
> But far be it for you to shut your fucking mouth during a conversation
> and actually hear what someone else is saying.
>
>
> </clue ends here>
>
>
> Again, read your opening remarks to me and convince the world that
> those are not the words of an enormous jackass.
>
>
> I have to go adjust the tote board once again. I'll be right back. In
> the meantime I give you a memorable quote from Planes, Trains, and
> Automobiles. I believe there is some information you will find useful:
>
>
> You know everything is not an anecdote. You have to discriminate. You
> choose things that are funny or mildly amusing or interesting. You're
> a miracle! Your stories have NONE of that. They're not even amusing
> ACCIDENTALLY! "Honey, I'd like you to meet Del Griffith, he's got some
> amusing anecodotes for you. Oh and here's a gun so you can blow your
> brains out. You'll thank me for it." I could tolerate any insurance
> seminar. For days I could sit there and listen to them go on and on
> with a big smile on my face. They'd say, "How can you stand it?" I'd
> say, "'Cause I've been with Del Griffith. I can take ANYTHING." You
> know what they'd say? They'd say, "I know what you mean. The shower
> curtain ring guy. Woah." It's like going on a date with a Chatty Cathy
> doll. I expect you have a little string on your chest, you know, that
> I pull out and have to snap back. Except I wouldn't pull it out and
> snap it back - you would. Agh! Agh! Agh! Agh! And by the way, you
> know, when you're telling these little stories? Here's a good idea -
> have a POINT. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!
>
>
> I'm back.....
>
>
> Congratulations Mikey. You're now #1
>
>
> Oh, and don't fucking email me. Keep it out here in public where you
> started it.
>
>
> Mutant Bluegrass That Rocks!
> http://www.thepickadillos.com