SNL Lampoons Mystery
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
This group will be restricted to 5,000 members. All new theory from the
creator of the PIVOT!
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
have been rendered worthless through mainstream media exposure. It really
is game over for community material. Beware of Milli Vanilli gurus who
stole their ideas from others!
http://moderncaveman.typepad.com
The Official Ray Gordon Blog
Alex
Leave it to Gordon to shill for a show that hasn't been intentionally
funny in over a decade.
So they've both got that going for them.
Mr X.
Did you post this message through jealousy or empathy? Like Mystery, I guess you get lampooned too - by people in this newsgroup.
However, there's a big difference - Mystery is a seduction expert and you, Roy Gordon Parker (AKA Ray Gordon), are not.
Now waddle down to the employment bureau and get a job... hope no one looks you up on Google though!
HA HA
Mr X.
Did you post this through jealousy or empathy? Because, like Mystery, I guess you get lampooned too - by people in this newsgroup.
J. Rosewater
posts I could find, I must admit to being confused. Why do you continue
to post on this forum, Ray, if no one believes you. Are you not
instigating the exact social reaction that you assume to threaten you.
If you constantly post and no one believes/trust/listens to you, then
are you not just wasting your time? I've seen some good posts (in my
opinion) go completely off track because you wanted to interject
something negative. Now, you do have a right to say what you want to
say. I'm in no way trying to shut you up. I just think you would do
better for your cause if you were to find another forum or make one of
your own. Best of luck to you.
--
-J.R.
-----------------------------------
A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered drawer.
HeeroYuy
"J. Rosewater" <guardia...@icqmail.com> wrote in message
news:lFmXi.1782$b%1.274@trnddc01...
> I've only been here for a short time. While reading all the Ray Gordon
> posts I could find, I must admit to being confused. Why do you continue to
> post on this forum, Ray, if no one believes you. Are you not instigating
> the exact social reaction that you assume to threaten you. If you
> constantly post and no one believes/trust/listens to you, then are you not
> just wasting your time? I've seen some good posts (in my opinion) go
> completely off track because you wanted to interject something negative.
> Now, you do have a right to say what you want to say. I'm in no way trying
> to shut you up. I just think you would do better for your cause if you
> were to find another forum or make one of your own. Best of luck to you.
Gordon has attempted that several times in the past. All of his attempts to
create other forums have failed. Oh, there might be members, but no one
posts, including himself.
lola...@yahoo.com
Quit defaming Gordon like that. Over on the "Project 55" Yahoo Group,
there have been five messages posted in the last week. One of the
messages is someone asking where Project 5000 (notice the lack of a
comma) is going to be held. One post observing that there haven't been
any posts in 7 days. One post by Gordon himself telling everyone that
he's been working his TAIL off lately, and not one, but TWO posts
inquiring where the videos from Gordons Youtube account went. Here's a
quote from Gordon's post to his Yahoo Group, with my comments:
-----Begin repost that contains a quote------------
-----Begin quote from Gordon Roy Parker in Project 5000-------
When I think of "game," I think back to times like 1995, when I was 28
years old, "gaming" a hot 17 year-old who barked at me from her third-
floor window, right in front of her mother, with whom I was talking
outside her home's front door. I got the number from the daughter and
full approval of the mother, who was also well aware of my age.
-------End quote from Gordon Roy Parker in Project 5000-------
The thing is, I know that this isn't completely true, just because of
who you are. But I wonder if it isn't factually true in some way. For
example, you don't say what the daughter barked down to you, and you
don't say what number you got from the daughter with the full approval
of the mother. I know you want the members of Project (5000-4946) to
think she barked something turn-on-ish down to you, and that the
number was her telephone number. But it could have just as easily been
the daughter barking for you to get away from her fucking house, and
the number was from the restraining order that keeps you 100 meters
away from her house.
Any one else want to come up with some theories on how the quoted
paragraph can be completely true, yet completely misleading?
-------End repost that contains a quote------------
So, Gordon, what, exactly did this 17 year-old bark down to you, and
what was the number the daughter gave you?
HeeroYuy
<lola...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194198933.7...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
I was under the impression that he gave up on that group, too. That's what I
get for not going there.
corky
people?
lola...@yahoo.com
corky wrote:
> Would Ray Gordon's life improve if he became a dishwasher and stopped suing
> people?
That would just make him Archimedes Plutonium circa 1995.
Say, remember when Archie went to Europe and got questioned heavily
about the chemical symbols he wrote all over his cape? I wonder if
that got him on any terrorist watch lists.
HeeroYuy
"corky" <co...@bureauofschmeng.com> wrote in message
news:oWoXi.62$1G4...@newsfe06.lga...
> Would Ray Gordon's life improve if he became a dishwasher and stopped
> suing people?
ANY menial job Gordon were to get would be an improvement on his life, no
doubt.
corky
"HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
news:472e2081$0$25165$4c36...@roadrunner.com...
That is what I mean. Think about it. A $10 an hour job full time is $20,000
annual. This is an improvement already. Then add possible medical and other
benifits. Add some social contact for mental health etc. Sounds like a full
time job at, say, olive garden would be a great idea for GRP.
corky
"Ted E Bear" <Tedd...@johndoes.org> wrote in message
news:1194206...@sp12lax.superfeed.net...
>
> On 4-Nov-2007, "corky" <co...@bureauofschmeng.com> wrote:
>
>> That is what I mean. Think about it. A $10 an hour job full time is
>> $20,000
>> annual. This is an improvement already. Then add possible medical and
>> other
>> benifits. Add some social contact for mental health etc. Sounds like a
>> full
>> time job at, say, olive garden would be a great idea for GRP.
>
> I
> would not have an appetite....yuck
How does he look? If so many people are stalking him, can one of you guys
snap a pic and post it or shoot a short video and put it on youtube? Would
that be so wrong?
> --
> The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
> expecting different results.
> Benjamin Franklin
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----
lola...@yahoo.com
corky wrote:
>
> How does he look? If so many people are stalking him, can one of you guys
> snap a pic and post it or shoot a short video and put it on youtube? Would
> that be so wrong?
>
5000. Just follow the link in his sig and sign up.
corky
Odious
<lola...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194207177....@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
What gets me is that gordo thinks that's a good picture of him.
How fucking hedious of a chud must this guy be in order for him to feel that
mug shot is a positive representation?
Alex
> <lolatg...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
People with an untreated mental illness often look disheveled and
messy.
Compared to what he must look like now, that picture probably is a
positive representation.
ZFORCE
"Alex" <alex...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194212201.4...@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Why don't we ask Thom. He would have seen the "creature"
J. Rosewater
the history lesson.
John Michaels
you taken your search a step further and looked him up on Google, you will
see. Unfortunately for all, it is part of his delusions. He some how
equates success and attention here with his being powerful. With Ray, it is
about power. He has none in his real life so he tries to get what he thinks
it is, here and other groups.
Ray has problems. Naturally he is denial because that is symptom of what is
wrong with him. It is not an excuse for his actions but simply something
that the rest of us have to deal with. It will always be someone else's
fault. He will scream and manipulate whatever is necessary to get the
attention and what he perceives as power.
"J. Rosewater" <guardia...@icqmail.com> wrote in message
news:lFmXi.1782$b%1.274@trnddc01...
J. Rosewater
think that his mindset would be very effective for me. I did eventually
go to the site and read some of his material, just to say I wasn't
completely ignorant of what the guy had to say. Needless to say I'm
still not interested. I still have yet to hear anything from Ray Gordon
about my previous post. But that is ok, the community here has already
spoken for him or more so the truth about him.
Thanks again...
Nicko
I haven't been around Usenet long enough to know much about this
Archie guy, but I found the following to be a tad giggle-inducing. I
was wondering whether someone from ARK composed it:
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Archimedes_Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium is at the same time the most brilliant and tragic
figure in the history of Usenet and the Internet. On November 7th
1990, he discovered the Plutonium Atom Totality Theory, which unified
chemistry, physics, biology, and mathematics, paved the way for world
peace, cured all diseases, and prevented cans of soda pop from
exploding when opened. Having accomplished all this, there was nothing
left for him to do with his time but correct the vicious lies being
written about him by the so-called experts on Wikipedia.
[edit] Background
Archimedes Plutonium was born on July 5th 1950. But upon discovering
that he was the reincarnation of the ancient Greco-Roman cartoon
character Pluto, he changed his full legal name to The King of
Science, Science Lord, Science horriblis, and Poet Extraordinaire. He
claims in Usenet posts that "Archimedes Plutonium" is his legal name,
but"
[edit] Plutonium Atom Totality Theory
By far, Archimedes Plutonium's greatest accomplishment is his
Plutonium Atom Totality Theory. According to Plutonium Atom Totality
Theory, at the center of every Usenet poster's brain is a plutonium
atom, each of which contains a complete universe in which all of his
or her so-called "fantasies" and "delusions" are true and obvious
facts. This discovery proved once and for all the futility of arguing
on the Internet, but physicists chose to ignore it because they liked
the feeling of smug superiority they got when correcting other people
on matters such as centrifugal force, the uncertainty principle, and
the precise definitions of "mass," "invariant," and "off-topic."
[edit] Other Accomplishments
Archimedes Plutonium has a long-standing arch-nemesis named Andrew
Wiles. On 4Dec1993, Wiles attempted to post updates on his latest
children's book to Usenet, but Plutonium used superdeterminism and p-
adics to prove that in fact, Wiles's work had been plagiarized from
Dr. Seuss. This embarrassed Wiles so much that he was never seen on
Usenet again, but it did not prevent him from spreading his lies in
"respectable" math journals.
On 8Oct1997, Archimedes was awarded the Nobel Prize in all categories.
However, Archimedes refused the prize money, and announced the
creation of his own prize, the Plutonium Atom Prize, awarded by the
King of Science (Archimedes Plutonium) to whoever he pleases, whenever
he feels like it. Upon his return to the United States, the IRS
claimed that he had in fact accepted the prize money, and threw him in
jail for tax evasion.
On 25 December 2004, Archimedes Plutonium corrected the poorly-written
Wikipedia article on himself by removing all the paragraph breaks and
rewriting the article in first person. Other Wikipedia editors were
jealous of his superb writing style, his efficient use of precious
lines and his mastery of NPOV, so they watched the article like hawks,
reverting everything he wrote. As a result, the world has been denied
important facts about Archimedes Plutonium, including his touching
tributes to the Wikipedia editors.