Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

www.scientologyintegrity.org

18 views
Skip to first unread message

Virginia McClaughry

unread,
Aug 12, 2005, 6:34:11 PM8/12/05
to

First, this is the whois record from www.network solutions.com, as of
2Pm today, for www.scientologyintegrity.org.


WHOIS Record For
scientologyintegrity.org

Certified Offer Service - Make an offer on this domain
Backorder - Try to get this name when it becomes available
Private Registration - Make personal information for this domain
private
SSL Certificates - Make this site secure
Site Confirm Seals - Become a trusted Web Site
Registrant: Make this info private
McClaughry, Mike

16289 W. Summerfield Rd
Post Falls, ID 83854
US

Domain Name: SCIENTOLOGYINTEGRITY.ORG

Administrative Contact , Technical Contact :
McClaughry, Mike
cha...@icehouse.net
16289 W. Summerfield Rd
Post Falls, ID 83854
US
Phone: 208-773-8240

Record expires on 13-Aug-2005
Record created on 13-Aug-2001
Database last updated on 02-Aug-2004

Domain servers in listed order: Manage DNS

NS0.ICEHOUSE.NET 216.255.223.194
NS1.ICEHOUSE.NET 216.255.223.195

Show underlying registry data for this record

IP Address: 216.255.223.198 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
IP Location: US(UNITED STATES)-WASHINGTON-SPOKANE
Record Type: Domain Name
Server Type: Apache 2
Web Site Status: Active
DMOZ 1 listings
Y! Directory: see listings
Secure: No
E-commerce: No
Traffic Ranking: 5
Data as of: 25-May-2004

-----


As you can see, the Expiration Date of the domain
www.scientologyintegrity.org as per Network Solutions
(www.networksolutions.com) is August 13, 2005.

Noone has contacted Mike who meets his requirements as of the time of
this post.

If Mike decides to allow the registration to lapse tomorrow, most
likely the Church of Scientology (Gwen Barnard DSA OSA CC Portland)
will try to be the first to buy it from Network Solutions.

Gwen Barnard, along with Russell Andrews have been harassing family and
other comm lines for months trying to achieve their goal of getting
Mike to sell the domain www.scientologyintegrity.org to the Church for
$400.00.

Russell Andrews is a Private Investigator with Triwest Investigative
Services, Inc. which is listed in a who what where as having a phone
number of 1-800-260-3484 and a number for Los Angeles Office as
323-254-5151. Email listed is triwe...@earthlink.net.

If you do a whois search on www.scientologyintegrity.com and .net, you
will see the owner is listed as the Church, and that these were
purchased I believe back in 2002.

Gwen Barnard has, to one family member behind our back, said that 'Mike
is channeling L. Ron Hubbard', which is not exactly behavior of a
Scientologist - more like the behavior of a Psychiatrist whose bible,
DSMIV (or whatever), lists belief in telepathy as indication of
'schizophrenia'.

Gwen also repeatedly called the family member at home and tried to get
the family member to contact Mike instead of doing it theirselves, and
attempted to pressure the family member in various ways. When told to
do it themselves, Gwen, in an attempt to again third party me to the
family member, said 'Will Virginia allow me to talk to Mike?' (This is
the 'Virginia controls Mike' (ergo Mike is some sort of slave) Black
Propaganda line first started here at our house by Erica Hauri)

Russell Andrews, has been 'making the rounds' of family and friends,
sometimes hiring out to other independent PI's in the Northwest Area,
since apparently last year. Russell, not too long ago, contacted a
family member and in this conversation proceeded to try and 3P us to
the family member by saying 'Did you know both her daughters are exotic
dancers?' and 'Did you know Virginia says that she talks to L. Ron
Hubbard?' and that 'Noone reads their site because it's too wierd.'
etc. etc.

Bearing in mind the above, where Gwen offers various lies to the family
member as to why they have not contacted us (one more of which is
basically trying to have it believed Mike can't be gotten ahold of) -
next Russell Andrews calls Mike maybe 1-2 weeks ago (blocks his caller
ID) and says that he is returning Mike's call to the PI hired in
Seattle to try and talk to one of my daughters (who refused) last
summer. Problem is, Mike didn't have an outstanding call to that PI,
nor had he made any such call in almost a year. So we have Gwen trying
to act like she can't get ahold of Mike to a family member behind our
back, but yet here is Russell Andrews on the phone with Mike AFTER
those calls to the family member, and he says nothing whatsoever to him
at that time about the domains.

Additionally, we have received phone calls from known Church ops,
trying to get Mike to give them or someone they know the domains, which
were refused. We have received a 'Joe Lisa' email, in which Joe talks
in a way Joe has never talked in his life, trying to get Mike to give
Joe the domain. When all of these failed, the Church was forced to do
their own dirty work and call directly, and on August 2, 2005 at
11:18Am Gwen Barnard calls and leaves a message in which amongst other
things, she does not delineate just what her post is in the Church.
Mike returns the call and gets her answering machine and leaves a
message. At 1:09PM Gwen calls back and proceeds to try and get Mike to
give her the domain. There were some very interesting tactics in this
call, one of which was when Mike indicated all the failed attempts of
their operatives (one of which was a front call by someone else for
Pierre Ethier), etc. etc., Gwen not only does she pretend she doesn't
know who Joe Lisa and others are, but she says very 1.1ly 'You don't
trust anybody.' which is an accusation of it being an anti-social
characterisic to not TRUST their lying operatives. What convenient
logic Gwen has there. This is another point of their campaign both in
the Church and out of the Church, is to try and have social
personalities viewed as anti-social, which LRH details in the bulletin
re: the anti-social, is exactly what SPs will do with these
characteristics once they know them. So here's Gwen lying and 3ping to
family members and acting like a psych instead of a scientologist, and
Mike correctly identifies the anti-social traits she is doing, and
correctly does not trust her, and she tries to turn that 180 degrees
around.

Also of note, is that Mike brought up,'Are you going to bring up the
I'm channelling L. Ron Hubbard lie next?' She says 'I'm not going to
get into that.' Mike then basically calls her on the fact that no
Scientologist would have a problem with communicating telepathically to
another thetan, nor would they call it 'channelling'. Another
interesting lie that Mike debunked to Gwen as obviously sourcing from
the Church (posted publically by Lone Ranger on Mike Hunsaker's forum
no less), is that Mike is SELLING the domains. That is not what he
said, nor is that the case now. These domains were offered for transfer
free of charge, other than the renewal fees the person would have to
pay anyway.

The long and the short of the call with Gwen, is that Mike refused to
transfer the domains willingly to the Church, for any price, and told
Gwen that he may even just let them lapse since they are not needed
anymore for what LRH has in mind for the future. In either case, the
Church fails in coercing in whatever form, Mike to willingly
specifically give them the domains.

So, if in the future you see a new owner of
www.scientologyintegrity.org, and you have not seen a public
announcement from Mike of HIM transferring the domain to that person
etc.? You will know it is because he decided to let them lapse, one by
one.

And anyone who tries to portray that differently such as 'Mike gave the
domains to the Church' etc. etc.,? Or that 'Mike took down the websites
because of pressure from the Church' - You will know these to be the
lies that they are, and those that utter any variation of the above, or
any variation on the true events contained in this post, well then by
their actions you shall know them.


Virginia

Larry T.

unread,
Aug 12, 2005, 6:48:13 PM8/12/05
to
"Virginia McClaughry" <vm...@icehouse.net> wrote in message
news:1123886051.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

>
>
> First, this is the whois record from www.network solutions.com,

Virginia:

I am very glad that you put this because I have a question if you can
answer.

www.networksolutions.com is a good who is and compared to:

http://www.whois.net/

or

http://www.register.com/

what is the really true big difference?

--
Larry T. @ http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeoqz2m/scientology/
"Step in to the dream world, step in to Uganda"

mpatt...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 12, 2005, 6:57:35 PM8/12/05
to
Most times, when domain expiration dates are reached you get a "grace
period" in the "pending delete" section. After the grace period the
site goes back on the open market, usually.
MP

Cerridwen

unread,
Aug 12, 2005, 7:09:21 PM8/12/05
to


Instead of getting into a games condition with the C of S, why don't you just
renew the website and keep it out of the hands of the Church.


Cerridwen

http://www.truthaboutscientology.com/stats/

So much entheta, so little time.


Larry T.

unread,
Aug 12, 2005, 7:53:35 PM8/12/05
to
"Cerridwen" <noad...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:T4W5EZHR3857...@anonymous.poster...


I agree.

Scientology is .com and Mike and Virginia are .org, there is no big
difference.

--
Larry T. @ http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeoqz2m/scientology/
"Step in to the dream world, step in to Uganda"
>
>

bodythetan

unread,
Aug 12, 2005, 11:14:19 PM8/12/05
to
"Virginia McClaughry" <vm...@icehouse.net> wrote in message
news:1123886051.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>

Technically, they all should bring up the same info; whois first looks up
the proper whois server for the domain in question and then contacts it.
Usually, the whois server is maintained by the registrar. I think Network
Solutions wasn't allowing other whois clients to connect to it for a while,
but that has since been resolved. Personally, I'm a big fan of the whois
lookup at http://dnsstuff.com. Lots of neat goodies there and it's pretty
damn fast.

-thatPTSkid


roger gonnet

unread,
Aug 13, 2005, 4:34:58 AM8/13/05
to

"Virginia McClaughry" <vm...@icehouse.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
1123886051.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

>
>
> First, this is the whois record from www.network solutions.com, as of
> 2Pm today, for www.scientologyintegrity.org.
>
>
> WHOIS Record For
> scientologyintegrity.org


generally, there is some time between closing a website and forbidding access.
Why is it that they forbid the access as soon as the date has been off?

Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.

Apache/2.0.47 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.47 OpenSSL/0.9.6g PHP/4.3.10
FrontPage/5.0.2.2634 Server at www.scientologyintegrity.org Port 80

r


Simkatu

unread,
Aug 13, 2005, 5:34:40 AM8/13/05
to
roger gonnet wrote:
>>scientologyintegrity.org
>
> generally, there is some time between closing a website and
forbidding access.
> Why is it that they forbid the access as soon as the date has been off?
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access / on this server.


The owners of the site pulled it themselves a while ago.

see: http://tinyurl.com/dygkw which shows it was gone at least 4 days ago.

They have until 01:00 UTC Aug 14, 2004 before the domain expires. I'm
not sure what the procedure is at their domain registrar for
post-expiration re-registration.

Android Cat

unread,
Aug 13, 2005, 7:37:38 AM8/13/05
to
bodythetan wrote:
>>
>> And anyone who tries to portray that differently such as 'Mike gave
>> the domains to the Church' etc. etc.,? Or that 'Mike took down the
>> websites because of pressure from the Church' - You will know these
>> to be the lies that they are, and those that utter any variation of
>> the above, or any variation on the true events contained in this
>> post, well then by their actions you shall know them.
>
> Technically, they all should bring up the same info; whois first
> looks up the proper whois server for the domain in question and then
> contacts it. Usually, the whois server is maintained by the
> registrar. I think Network Solutions wasn't allowing other whois
> clients to connect to it for a while, but that has since been
> resolved. Personally, I'm a big fan of the whois lookup at
> http://dnsstuff.com. Lots of neat goodies there and it's pretty damn
> fast.

They should check the root whois server for that TLD to see which registrar
has it then check that registrar for the data.

Domain ID:D76004206-LROR
Domain Name:SCIENTOLOGYINTEGRITY.ORG
Created On:14-Aug-2001 01:00:35 UTC
Last Updated On:24-Oct-2004 19:37:46 UTC
Expiration Date:14-Aug-2005 01:00:30 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions LLC (R63-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:16357401-NSI
Registrant Name:Mike McClaughry

If CoS picks it up, I'll just add it to my list of their hundreds of other
parked domains. Then they're *stuck* because if they ever let it go, I'll
post when they do.

No big deal either way since the site returns:
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden

--
Ron of that ilk.


0 new messages