New Humane Roach Spray
Sean
fills them with so much self doubt, they begin wondering if they are in the
right house!
boom boom <G>
--
~ Ullatenus Quovis Quilibet ~
a.r.e. Home of Obnubilation
Michael
Unfortunately, on new trials with detractors, the effect of self-doubt only
perpetuated a state of bias, and drove them deeped into the sheltered belief
system of their enti-cult cult <G>
Love
Michael
"Sean" <lifeswha...@earth.org> wrote in message
news:bOWdneXhzv2...@inspired.net.au...
Sean
"Michael" <Fl...@phurpfy.com> wrote in message
news:newscache$db5enh$5bb$1...@mars.dataline.net.au...
@aloha.net Rich
"Sean" <lifeswha...@earth.org> wrote
> It's like a normal can of roach spray, but it doesn't kill them. It
actually
> fills them with so much self doubt, they begin wondering if they are
in the
> right house!
>
> boom boom <G>
LOL Now if only someone could invent a similar unsent pixel troll
spray, they would become millionaires overnight.
` o
|
~/|
_/ |\
/ | \
-/ | \
_ /____|___\_
(___________/
Rich~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Sailing the CyberSea~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arelurker
Rich wrote:
>
> "Sean" <lifeswha...@earth.org> wrote
>
> > It's like a normal can of roach spray, but it doesn't kill them. It
> actually
> > fills them with so much self doubt, they begin wondering if they are
> in the
> > right house!
> >
> > boom boom <G>
>
> LOL Now if only someone could invent a similar unsent pixel troll
> spray, they would become millionaires overnight.
This kind of rhetoric really supports the thesis of how religious
fanatics dehumanizing critics. When you start thinking of them as bugs
that you can spray, what is next? The same thinking (different degree
Cher!) Sadam use to spray his people with poison gas, eh? He dehumanized
his critics too, and tried neutralized them. And now you and Cher are
trying to clean up the behavior of critics by dehumanize them and
threaten to call their children, etc.
It never fails that what these eckists point out that they see in others
(dehumanizing) they are themselves doing.
Lurk
cher
Sean
"cher" <gruen...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3F9EBA63...@worldnet.att.net...
Date: 2002-03-04 16:09:55 PST
The thing that arose in my mind after I read Cher's response
is: "What a cunt."
Lurk
Date: 2003-09-02 10:04:10 PST
Okay. How about this: You're pulling double duty here on a.r.e....you're
not only the village idiot, but the town cunt as well. <smile>
How's that? Are we having fun yet?
Lurk
OCTOBER 2003
Now CUNT, show us where Ford "point blank lied to Harold" if you want to
defend Sean's viewpoint.
CUNT, before you give lectures on objectivity, go ahead and support
Sean's contention by backing it up with the alleged lie Ford point
blank told Harold.
Lurk
> > > > > > > > But CUNT, Calling people Ford, when they are not is worthy
of an apology...an
> > > > > > > > admission that you are wrong.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Lurk
Cher invited me to play a name game with her. She calls me Betty and I
call her cunt. I told Cher if me calling her a cunt offended her, all
she had to do was tell me and ask me to stop.
Lurk
SAM WROTE:
> That is TOTALLY uncalled for and controlling. It
> serves NOBODY any good at a.r.e., or anywhere for that matter. It is about
a
> LOW as LOW as can get. When I talked with Cher on the phone, she was
polite,
> full of fun and laughter. We enjoyed talking to one another person to
> person. I've talked with Sean also. David Soul Words as well. If only lurk
> had the guts to post his real name like that and take all POV into the
> equation!!!!!
> I may not have much a life due to my current struggles, but DAMN it, I
say,
> have compassion for another human being despite my own problems! Lurk is
not
> reaching out to anybody!
>
> What it really all boils down to is STATES OF CONSCIOUSNESS. From day to
day
> these are never quite the same. It is, however progressive that we are
> trying to achieve of SOUL's incredible imagination and purity of SPIRIT
and
> LOVE, no matter how hard a blow we've been dealt with in life.
>
> If I'd ever find myself out on the street begging for food, I'd at least
> hope that any person who should see me would say: Sam, despite your
> dillemnas, we still love you.
>
> LOVE
> SAM
arelurker
cher wrote:
>
> Don't make yourself sick over this lurk. <sigh>
Those were serious points and this is your response?
This doesn't lead me to believe you are interested in dialog.
Lurk
arelurker
Where else can someone call a women cunt and have one of her fellow
members repeated in a post for her over and over.
Thanks for doing my dirty work Sean. I think she needs to here it again.
Lurk
cher
light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
nigger? How about Jew? Maybe you could shed some light on this
specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
who decided I should have this lesson. Why? What is it in your world
that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
or need it?
Sean
> Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk? Perhaps you could shed some
> light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> nigger? How about Jew? Maybe you could shed some light on this
> specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> who decided I should have this lesson. Why? What is it in your world
> that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> or need it?
>
> arelurker wrote:
> >
> > Sean,
> >
> > Where else can someone call a women cunt and have one of her fellow
> > members repeated in a post for her over and over.
> >
> > Thanks for doing my dirty work Sean. I think she needs to here it again.
> >
> > Lurk
You wrote it Lurk ............... and now admit it is DIRTY work. Such are
the workings of mind dedicated to Hate Crimes and Cyber Harrassment and
supporting stupid people with guns.
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
Thank you for your interest in contacting Charter Communications. To better
serve you we have enhanced our "Contact Us" page on our website. You must
use this page so that your email inquiry will be directed to the support
representative best able to address your inquiry.
Please visit us at:
http://www.chartercom.com/service/contact/contact_form.asp
If you are sending a complaint regarding Internet abuse, spam, etc., please
resend your e-mail directly to ab...@charter.net. This will ensure it is
properly tracked and analyzed by our system. You can also submit an abuse
complaint via a web form at http://abuse.charter.net.
For product and service information check out the Product and Services
area on our website accessible from http://www.charter.com .
Just copy and paste the lower portions of this email if you'd like to
contact Charter.net or Supernews
Cheers
arelurker
cher wrote:
>
> Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk?
Because it applies? Upon realizing this, you could choose to behave differently?
Perhaps you could shed some
> light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> nigger? How about Jew?
Cunt refers to a very angry women. Cultist refers to people who join
cult groups. and Nigger is term use to refer to black people in a
derogatory way. Or sometimes nigger is use within the black community
as a term of endearment, as in, "he's my nigger." Jew refers to Jewish people.
How are these terms are different is obvious.
Maybe you could shed some light on this
> specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> who decided I should have this lesson. Why?
I think you should know how you act. It's obnoxious. Just trying to be
helpful.
What is it in your world
> that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> or need it?
I think cunt, or my connotation of the word cunt, is appropriate to you.
I think you're an angry women.
Again, as I repeated in the passed, if you don't want me to call you
this, all you have to do is let me know how it hurts your feelings and
I'll stop. Why not take the step to empower yourself?
Lurk
cher
>
> cher wrote:
> >
> > Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk?
>
> Because it applies? Upon realizing this, you could choose to behave differently?
How? Could you give us all examples of what a woman needs to do to earn
this mighty word of yours? Perhaps give us a better understanding of
what sort of changes in behavior you believe a woman should adopt by
accepting this word as fair assessment of her as a human being? Please,
feel free to provide us with an understanding of how this works!
> Perhaps you could shed some
> > light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> > nigger? How about Jew?
>
> Cunt refers to a very angry women. Cultist refers to people who join
> cult groups. and Nigger is term use to refer to black people in a
> derogatory way. Or sometimes nigger is use within the black community
> as a term of endearment, as in, "he's my nigger." Jew refers to Jewish people.
>
> How are these terms are different is obvious.
Really? You think so?
> Maybe you could shed some light on this
> > specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> > this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> > who decided I should have this lesson. Why?
>
> I think you should know how you act. It's obnoxious. Just trying to be
> helpful.
So you don't like how I act and this gives you the right to use this
word to effect a change in my personality to suit you? Is that what
you're saying here? Hmmmm? And you see this as helpful? That's the word
you chose to use here, right? Helpful?
> What is it in your world
> > that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> > or need it?
>
> I think cunt, or my connotation of the word cunt, is appropriate to you.
> I think you're an angry women.
And that gives you the right to use this word to effect a change that
you would deem appropriate, right? <smile> Because you see me as an
angry woman.
> Again, as I repeated in the passed, if you don't want me to call you
> this, all you have to do is let me know how it hurts your feelings and
> I'll stop. Why not take the step to empower yourself?
Really? So if I admit that you managed to hurt me, to harm me then
you'll stop this behavior of yours? Is that the premise here? You use
this word in an attempt to cause me hurt and harm and this should be
empowering to me or any woman? Is that what you're saying here? You
think that this is a weapon of power over others then?
arelurker
cher wrote:
>
> arelurker wrote:
> >
> > cher wrote:
> > >
> > > Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk?
> >
> > Because it applies? Upon realizing this, you could choose to behave differently?
>
> How? Could you give us all examples of what a woman needs to do to earn
> this mighty word of yours?
Be like you.
Perhaps give us a better understanding of
> what sort of changes in behavior you believe a woman should adopt by
> accepting this word as fair assessment of her as a human being?
Huh?
Please,
> feel free to provide us with an understanding of how this works!
>
> > Perhaps you could shed some
> > > light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> > > nigger? How about Jew?
> >
> > Cunt refers to a very angry women. Cultist refers to people who join
> > cult groups. and Nigger is term use to refer to black people in a
> > derogatory way. Or sometimes nigger is use within the black community
> > as a term of endearment, as in, "he's my nigger." Jew refers to Jewish people.
> >
> > How are these terms are different is obvious.
>
> Really? You think so?
I didn't think you would have much to say since the question you asked
was stupid.
>
> > Maybe you could shed some light on this
> > > specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> > > this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> > > who decided I should have this lesson. Why?
> >
> > I think you should know how you act. It's obnoxious. Just trying to be
> > helpful.
>
> So you don't like how I act and this gives you the right to use this
> word to effect a change in my personality to suit you?
Yes, I have a right to point out your obnoxious behavior.
Is that what
> you're saying here? Hmmmm? And you see this as helpful?
Yes, it is obviously a blind spot for you.
That's the word
> you chose to use here, right? Helpful?
Yes, nothing like a little language shocker to wake you out of your
cunty stupor.
>
> > What is it in your world
> > > that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> > > or need it?
> >
> > I think cunt, or my connotation of the word cunt, is appropriate to you.
> > I think you're an angry women.
>
> And that gives you the right to use this word to effect a change that
> you would deem appropriate, right? <smile> Because you see me as an
> angry woman.
Yes, instead of saying angry women, I say cunt. It is easier and hits
the nail on the head.
>
> > Again, as I repeated in the passed, if you don't want me to call you
> > this, all you have to do is let me know how it hurts your feelings and
> > I'll stop. Why not take the step to empower yourself?
>
> Really? So if I admit that you managed to hurt me, to harm me then
> you'll stop this behavior of yours?
Yes, I would refrain from using the word.
Is that the premise here? You use
> this word in an attempt to cause me hurt and harm and this should be
> empowering to me or any woman?
No, that is a leap. I have no idea if it hurts your feelings. Does it?
> Is that what you're saying here? You
> think that this is a weapon of power over others then?
You still didn't answer the question. I'm giving you an opportunity to
empower yourself. All you have to do is admit you don't like it or it
hurts your feelings and I'll stop. Why is that so difficult for you?
Lurk
cher
>
> cher wrote:
> >
> > arelurker wrote:
> > >
> > > cher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk?
> > >
> > > Because it applies? Upon realizing this, you could choose to behave differently?
> >
> > How? Could you give us all examples of what a woman needs to do to earn
> > this mighty word of yours?
>
> Be like you.
>
> Perhaps give us a better understanding of
> > what sort of changes in behavior you believe a woman should adopt by
> > accepting this word as fair assessment of her as a human being?
>
> Huh?
Think about it. Ask around. Maybe ask some of the women in your life
what I mean.
> Please,
> > feel free to provide us with an understanding of how this works!
> >
> > > Perhaps you could shed some
> > > > light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> > > > nigger? How about Jew?
> > >
> > > Cunt refers to a very angry women. Cultist refers to people who join
> > > cult groups. and Nigger is term use to refer to black people in a
> > > derogatory way. Or sometimes nigger is use within the black community
> > > as a term of endearment, as in, "he's my nigger." Jew refers to Jewish people.
> > >
> > > How are these terms are different is obvious.
> >
> > Really? You think so?
>
> I didn't think you would have much to say since the question you asked
> was stupid.
Hate is hate, lurk. It doesn't matter whether or its gender race creed
or color. Hate is hate.
> >
> > > Maybe you could shed some light on this
> > > > specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> > > > this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> > > > who decided I should have this lesson. Why?
> > >
> > > I think you should know how you act. It's obnoxious. Just trying to be
> > > helpful.
> >
> > So you don't like how I act and this gives you the right to use this
> > word to effect a change in my personality to suit you?
>
> Yes, I have a right to point out your obnoxious behavior.
Point out? By labeling me an offensive hurtful word? That's
dehumanizing. You don't work with women, do you?
> Is that what
> > you're saying here? Hmmmm? And you see this as helpful?
>
> Yes, it is obviously a blind spot for you.
>
> That's the word
> > you chose to use here, right? Helpful?
>
> Yes, nothing like a little language shocker to wake you out of your
> cunty stupor.
Gee... so close to cultic stupor, your favorite hate phrase of
dehumanizing a person or people.
> >
> > > What is it in your world
> > > > that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> > > > or need it?
> > >
> > > I think cunt, or my connotation of the word cunt, is appropriate to you.
> > > I think you're an angry women.
> >
> > And that gives you the right to use this word to effect a change that
> > you would deem appropriate, right? <smile> Because you see me as an
> > angry woman.
>
> Yes, instead of saying angry women, I say cunt. It is easier and hits
> the nail on the head.
And it's a violent word so it must make you feel like a real man then,
hey? I mean the word you chose is so angry that one is supposed to be
hurt and become subserviant to your demands. <smile>
> >
> > > Again, as I repeated in the passed, if you don't want me to call you
> > > this, all you have to do is let me know how it hurts your feelings and
> > > I'll stop. Why not take the step to empower yourself?
> >
> > Really? So if I admit that you managed to hurt me, to harm me then
> > you'll stop this behavior of yours?
>
> Yes, I would refrain from using the word.
tsk.....
> Is that the premise here? You use
> > this word in an attempt to cause me hurt and harm and this should be
> > empowering to me or any woman?
>
> No, that is a leap. I have no idea if it hurts your feelings. Does it?
No, it doesn't hurt my feelings lurk. I consider the source. That pretty
much puts it in perspective.
> > Is that what you're saying here? You
> > think that this is a weapon of power over others then?
>
> You still didn't answer the question. I'm giving you an opportunity to
> empower yourself. All you have to do is admit you don't like it or it
> hurts your feelings and I'll stop. Why is that so difficult for you?
Well because you decide to call me such a name doesn't mean that I take
it heart. <lol> So I don't understand where you're coming from that you
believe I would need to feel anything abou it. Now making a point about
your social suicide is another thing altogether. See, this is exactly
why you need to stay anonymous when posting. But it doesn't have
anything to do with me. <chuckling>
arelurker
cher wrote:
>
> arelurker wrote:
> >
> > cher wrote:
> > >
> > > arelurker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > cher wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk?
> > > >
> > > > Because it applies? Upon realizing this, you could choose to behave differently?
> > >
> > > How? Could you give us all examples of what a woman needs to do to earn
> > > this mighty word of yours?
> >
> > Be like you.
> >
> > Perhaps give us a better understanding of
> > > what sort of changes in behavior you believe a woman should adopt by
> > > accepting this word as fair assessment of her as a human being?
> >
> > Huh?
>
> Think about it. Ask around. Maybe ask some of the women in your life
> what I mean.
Cher, the last thing I think of when I'm with a women is you're cunty behavior.
>
> > Please,
> > > feel free to provide us with an understanding of how this works!
> > >
> > > > Perhaps you could shed some
> > > > > light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> > > > > nigger? How about Jew?
> > > >
> > > > Cunt refers to a very angry women. Cultist refers to people who join
> > > > cult groups. and Nigger is term use to refer to black people in a
> > > > derogatory way. Or sometimes nigger is use within the black community
> > > > as a term of endearment, as in, "he's my nigger." Jew refers to Jewish people.
> > > >
> > > > How are these terms are different is obvious.
> > >
> > > Really? You think so?
> >
> > I didn't think you would have much to say since the question you asked
> > was stupid.
>
> Hate is hate, lurk. It doesn't matter whether or its gender race creed
> or color. Hate is hate.
Or your self hatred you can't seem to acknowledge and project.
The FBI isn't going to help you with shadows Cher.
>
> > >
> > > > Maybe you could shed some light on this
> > > > > specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> > > > > this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> > > > > who decided I should have this lesson. Why?
> > > >
> > > > I think you should know how you act. It's obnoxious. Just trying to be
> > > > helpful.
> > >
> > > So you don't like how I act and this gives you the right to use this
> > > word to effect a change in my personality to suit you?
> >
> > Yes, I have a right to point out your obnoxious behavior.
>
> Point out? By labeling me an offensive hurtful word?
Yes. Is it working?
> That's
> dehumanizing. You don't work with women, do you?
Your behavior is dehumanizing, so I guess the term fits.
>
> > Is that what
> > > you're saying here? Hmmmm? And you see this as helpful?
> >
> > Yes, it is obviously a blind spot for you.
> >
> > That's the word
> > > you chose to use here, right? Helpful?
> >
> > Yes, nothing like a little language shocker to wake you out of your
> > cunty stupor.
>
> Gee... so close to cultic stupor, your favorite hate phrase of
> dehumanizing a person or people.
Yeah, you got two things going at once: a cultic stupor and a cunty
stupor. You need some industrial strength help.
>
> > >
> > > > What is it in your world
> > > > > that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> > > > > or need it?
> > > >
> > > > I think cunt, or my connotation of the word cunt, is appropriate to you.
> > > > I think you're an angry women.
> > >
> > > And that gives you the right to use this word to effect a change that
> > > you would deem appropriate, right? <smile> Because you see me as an
> > > angry woman.
> >
> > Yes, instead of saying angry women, I say cunt. It is easier and hits
> > the nail on the head.
>
> And it's a violent word so it must make you feel like a real man then,
> hey? I mean the word you chose is so angry that one is supposed to be
> hurt and become subserviant to your demands. <smile>
If the term seems angry to you, it is because it describes your anger.
>
> > >
> > > > Again, as I repeated in the passed, if you don't want me to call you
> > > > this, all you have to do is let me know how it hurts your feelings and
> > > > I'll stop. Why not take the step to empower yourself?
> > >
> > > Really? So if I admit that you managed to hurt me, to harm me then
> > > you'll stop this behavior of yours?
> >
> > Yes, I would refrain from using the word.
>
> tsk.....
>
> > Is that the premise here? You use
> > > this word in an attempt to cause me hurt and harm and this should be
> > > empowering to me or any woman?
> >
> > No, that is a leap. I have no idea if it hurts your feelings. Does it?
>
> No, it doesn't hurt my feelings lurk. I consider the source. That pretty
> much puts it in perspective.
>
> > > Is that what you're saying here? You
> > > think that this is a weapon of power over others then?
> >
> > You still didn't answer the question. I'm giving you an opportunity to
> > empower yourself. All you have to do is admit you don't like it or it
> > hurts your feelings and I'll stop. Why is that so difficult for you?
>
> Well because you decide to call me such a name doesn't mean that I take
> it heart. <lol>
Then what is the big deal?
> So I don't understand where you're coming from that you
> believe I would need to feel anything abou it.
Yeah yeah yeah, we know Cher, it doesn't affect you....you don't feel
anything. Right.
Again, I would like to draw everyone's attention to the fact that when
Cher is given the opportunity to empower herself, by asking me to stop
calling her cunt, she refuses to do so? I suspect that she thinks such
admission would make her vulnerable. So she pretends it doesn't bother
her. You really ought to try standing in your truth Cher, you might get
what you want more often.
Now making a point about
> your social suicide is another thing altogether. See, this is exactly
> why you need to stay anonymous when posting. But it doesn't have
> anything to do with me. <chuckling>
Awful grandiose of you to think a women wouldn't read you responses and
come to the same conclusion.
Lurk
cher
cher wrote:
>
> arelurker wrote:
> >
> > cher wrote:
> > >
> > > arelurker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > cher wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do I need to hear that word, again lurk?
> > > >
> > > > Because it applies? Upon realizing this, you could choose to behave differently?
> > >
> > > How? Could you give us all examples of what a woman needs to do to earn
> > > this mighty word of yours?
> >
> > Be like you.
> >
> > Perhaps give us a better understanding of
> > > what sort of changes in behavior you believe a woman should adopt by
> > > accepting this word as fair assessment of her as a human being?
> >
> > Huh?
>
> Think about it. Ask around. Maybe ask some of the women in your life
> what I mean.
Cher, the last thing I think of when I'm with a women is you're cunty
behavior.
>
> > Please,
> > > feel free to provide us with an understanding of how this works!
> > >
> > > > Perhaps you could shed some
> > > > > light on how the word cunt differs from the word cultist or the word
> > > > > nigger? How about Jew?
> > > >
> > > > Cunt refers to a very angry women. Cultist refers to people who join
> > > > cult groups. and Nigger is term use to refer to black people in a
> > > > derogatory way. Or sometimes nigger is use within the black community
> > > > as a term of endearment, as in, "he's my nigger." Jew refers to Jewish people.
> > > >
> > > > How are these terms are different is obvious.
> > >
> > > Really? You think so?
> >
> > I didn't think you would have much to say since the question you asked
> > was stupid.
>
> Hate is hate, lurk. It doesn't matter whether or its gender race creed
> or color. Hate is hate.
Or your self hatred you can't seem to acknowledge and project.
The FBI isn't going to help you with shadows Cher.
>
> > >
> > > > Maybe you could shed some light on this
> > > > > specialized language structure? Seems that you recognize the impact of
> > > > > this word or you wouldn't be able to say this to Sean. You are the one
> > > > > who decided I should have this lesson. Why?
> > > >
> > > > I think you should know how you act. It's obnoxious. Just trying to be
> > > > helpful.
> > >
> > > So you don't like how I act and this gives you the right to use this
> > > word to effect a change in my personality to suit you?
> >
> > Yes, I have a right to point out your obnoxious behavior.
>
> Point out? By labeling me an offensive hurtful word?
Yes. Is it working?
> That's
> dehumanizing. You don't work with women, do you?
Your behavior is dehumanizing, so I guess the term fits.
>
> > Is that what
> > > you're saying here? Hmmmm? And you see this as helpful?
> >
> > Yes, it is obviously a blind spot for you.
> >
> > That's the word
> > > you chose to use here, right? Helpful?
> >
> > Yes, nothing like a little language shocker to wake you out of your
> > cunty stupor.
>
> Gee... so close to cultic stupor, your favorite hate phrase of
> dehumanizing a person or people.
Yeah, you got two things going at once: a cultic stupor and a cunty
stupor. You need some industrial strength help.
>
> > >
> > > > What is it in your world
> > > > > that allows these sorts of words to give you the illusion you have power
> > > > > or need it?
> > > >
> > > > I think cunt, or my connotation of the word cunt, is appropriate to you.
> > > > I think you're an angry women.
> > >
> > > And that gives you the right to use this word to effect a change that
> > > you would deem appropriate, right? <smile> Because you see me as an
> > > angry woman.
> >
> > Yes, instead of saying angry women, I say cunt. It is easier and hits
> > the nail on the head.
>
> And it's a violent word so it must make you feel like a real man then,
> hey? I mean the word you chose is so angry that one is supposed to be
> hurt and become subserviant to your demands. <smile>
If the term seems angry to you, it is because it describes your anger.
>
> > >
> > > > Again, as I repeated in the passed, if you don't want me to call you
> > > > this, all you have to do is let me know how it hurts your feelings and
> > > > I'll stop. Why not take the step to empower yourself?
> > >
> > > Really? So if I admit that you managed to hurt me, to harm me then
> > > you'll stop this behavior of yours?
> >
> > Yes, I would refrain from using the word.
>
> tsk.....
>
> > Is that the premise here? You use
> > > this word in an attempt to cause me hurt and harm and this should be
> > > empowering to me or any woman?
> >
> > No, that is a leap. I have no idea if it hurts your feelings. Does it?
>
> No, it doesn't hurt my feelings lurk. I consider the source. That pretty
> much puts it in perspective.
>
> > > Is that what you're saying here? You
> > > think that this is a weapon of power over others then?
> >
> > You still didn't answer the question. I'm giving you an opportunity to
> > empower yourself. All you have to do is admit you don't like it or it
> > hurts your feelings and I'll stop. Why is that so difficult for you?
>
> Well because you decide to call me such a name doesn't mean that I take
> it heart. <lol>
Then what is the big deal?
> So I don't understand where you're coming from that you
> believe I would need to feel anything abou it.
Yeah yeah yeah, we know Cher, it doesn't affect you....you don't feel
anything. Right.
Again, I would like to draw everyone's attention to the fact that when
Cher is given the opportunity to empower herself, by asking me to stop
calling her cunt, she refuses to do so? I suspect that she thinks such
admission would make her vulnerable. So she pretends it doesn't bother
her. You really ought to try standing in your truth Cher, you might get
what you want more often.
Now making a point about
> your social suicide is another thing altogether. See, this is exactly
> why you need to stay anonymous when posting. But it doesn't have
> anything to do with me. <chuckling>
Awful grandiose of you to think a women wouldn't read you responses and
come to the same conclusion.
Lurk
Sean
<snip>
CHER
> > > > Is that what you're saying here? You
> > > > think that this is a weapon of power over others then?
> > >
LURK
> > > You still didn't answer the question. I'm giving you an opportunity to
> > > empower yourself. All you have to do is admit you don't like it or it
> > > hurts your feelings and I'll stop. Why is that so difficult for you?
> >
> > Well because you decide to call me such a name doesn't mean that I take
> > it heart. <lol>
>
> Then what is the big deal?
>
> > So I don't understand where you're coming from that you
> > believe I would need to feel anything abou it.
>
> Yeah yeah yeah, we know Cher, it doesn't affect you....you don't feel
> anything. Right.
>
> Again, I would like to draw everyone's attention to the fact that when
> Cher is given the opportunity to empower herself, by asking me to stop
> calling her cunt, she refuses to do so? I suspect that she thinks such
> admission would make her vulnerable. So she pretends it doesn't bother
> her. You really ought to try standing in your truth Cher, you might get
> what you want more often.
>
This really sums it up well.
Lurk needs cher to ask him to stop doing what he chose to do of his own
volition.
And this "person" says Eckankar displays "cultic behaviour" by allegdedly
the ESC or the leader telling people how they should live their life [when
they don't].
Talk about "controlling", personally disempowered and cultic thinking gone
totally wild.
I suspect this man is in serious need of some serious help.
Can anyone help him?
<shaking head in disbelief>
Michael Wallace
But Lost in Spin... I thought that was reserved for the Politicians??
Love
Michael
"Sean" <lifeswha...@earth.org> wrote in message
news:r8-dnQFMS_g...@inspired.net.au...
Michael Wallace
But Lost in Spin... I thought that was reserved for the Politicians??
Love
Michael
"Sean" <lifeswha...@earth.org> wrote in message
news:r8-dnQFMS_g...@inspired.net.au...
>
arelurker
Cher did not respond to this point. I think it is the most important in
the post.
The other thing that is important is how Cher feels controlled by
someone calling here a cunt as she indicated in the subject line.
Lurk
arelurker
What wrong with that. If it offends her personally, Cher needs to speak
up about it. Otherwise, I'll assume she takes it as a term of endearment.
Lurk
cher
cher
You know the more you say the deeper that hole gets, lurk.
arelurker
So what is it? Do you want me to continue you to call you a cunt or not?
Out of all these posts I have heard you directly tell me you don't like it.
Lurk
Michael Wallace
The difference between a priest a politician, a lawyer and a thief is very
simple... Only one admits to his profession...
Love
Michael
"cher" <gruen...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3FA50616...@worldnet.att.net...
Sean
"arelurker" <arel...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:3FA51877...@charter.net...
That's a decision only you can make Lurkie.
May you reap the consequences of your choice 100 fold or more.
arelurker
A decision based on feedback from Cher.
>
> May you reap the consequences of your choice 100 fold or more.
And may you reinsert your head up you ass.
Lurk
Sean
That may be partly so as far as available information is concerned, but the
decision itself is based upon yourself and no one else.
Unless you generally run your life according to what other people think, do
and say. Sounds very disempowering to me. But what would I know seeing
you're the resident expert in such matters?
> >
> > May you reap the consequences of your choice 100 fold or more.
>
>
> And may you reinsert your head up you ass.
>
> Lurk
>
I'm enjoying the fresh just fine thanks, how are you doing? <G>
arelurker
But it may not be an issue for me to call her a cunt if she likes to be
calle a cunt. See what I mean?
>
> Unless you generally run your life according to what other people think, do
> and say. Sounds very disempowering to me. But what would I know seeing
> you're the resident expert in such matters?
>
> > >
> > > May you reap the consequences of your choice 100 fold or more.
> >
> >
> > And may you reinsert your head up you ass.
> >
> > Lurk
> >
>
> I'm enjoying the fresh just fine thanks, how are you doing? <G>
Fresh what? Crap?
Lurk
Sean
>
>
> Sean wrote:
> >
> > "arelurker" <arel...@charter.net> wrote in message
> > news:3FA645F1...@charter.net...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You know the more you say the deeper that hole gets, lurk.
> > > > >
> > > > > So what is it? Do you want me to continue you to call you a cunt
or
> > not?
> > > > >
> > > > > Out of all these posts I have heard you directly tell me you don't
> > like
> > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lurk
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's a decision only you can make Lurkie.
> > >
> > > A decision based on feedback from Cher.
> > >
> >
> > That may be partly so as far as available information is concerned, but
the
> > decision itself is based upon yourself and no one else.
>
> But it may not be an issue for me to call her a cunt if she likes to be
> calle a cunt. See what I mean?
>
Oh yes sir I see exactly what you mean. If someone, iyo, is willing to be
verbally abused then you are quite willing to do it, because you hold no
personal standards that would preclude such behaviour. In other words you
don't real have a mind of yuor own but swayed by anyone's opinion rather
than basing your actions upon your own internal principles and character.
That's obvious, that's why it appears you need some external intervention to
assist you in determining acceptable PUBLIC behaviour.
Lucky for you there are folks in the world willing to help you in this
regard. Please contact your local health service provider.
>
> >
> > Unless you generally run your life according to what other people think,
do
> > and say. Sounds very disempowering to me. But what would I know seeing
> > you're the resident expert in such matters?
> >
mmmmmm, no comment?
> > > >
> > > > May you reap the consequences of your choice 100 fold or more.
> > >
> > >
> > > And may you reinsert your head up you ass.
> > >
> > > Lurk
> > >
> >
> > I'm enjoying the fresh just fine thanks, how are you doing? <G>
>
> Fresh what? Crap?
>
> Lurk
>
You've lost it Lurk ............ can we turn the clock back 3 or 4 years, it
was a challenge to me then. ;-))
arelurker
Sean wrote:
>
> "arelurker" <arel...@charter.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA6F385...@charter.net...
> >
> >
> > Sean wrote:
> > >
> > > "arelurker" <arel...@charter.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3FA645F1...@charter.net...
>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You know the more you say the deeper that hole gets, lurk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So what is it? Do you want me to continue you to call you a cunt
> or
> > > not?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Out of all these posts I have heard you directly tell me you don't
> > > like
> > > > > it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lurk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That's a decision only you can make Lurkie.
> > > >
> > > > A decision based on feedback from Cher.
> > > >
> > >
> > > That may be partly so as far as available information is concerned, but
> the
> > > decision itself is based upon yourself and no one else.
> >
> > But it may not be an issue for me to call her a cunt if she likes to be
> > calle a cunt. See what I mean?
> >
>
> Oh yes sir I see exactly what you mean. If someone, iyo, is willing to be
> verbally abused then you are quite willing to do it, because you hold no
> personal standards that would preclude such behaviour.
She may not think calling her a cunt is abuse. You're assuming it is.
In other words you
> don't real have a mind of yuor own but swayed by anyone's opinion rather
> than basing your actions upon your own internal principles and character.
People's sensibilities are different. I look for external cues to make
sure I'm not disrespecting other's sensibilities. So far she has not
given me any direct cues.
>
> That's obvious, that's why it appears you need some external intervention to
> assist you in determining acceptable PUBLIC behaviour.
Yes, when it comes to other people's sensibilities. I don't assume like
you do. You think you know what is best for everyone right?
Again, I think we have stumbled onto the crux of the problem on a.r.e..
Eckists like Sean think they know the sensibilities of others SHOULD be
and try to enforce such.
Lurk