Handling Hostile Attacks - Denials by Liars - Dead Agenting

[Peetee Aitchei]

About Handling Hostile Attacks - Denials by Liars - Dead Agenting

HANDLING HOSTILE CONTACTS who Publicly Attack the Messenger of Truthful Facts

HANDLING DENIALS BY LIARS, their Lawyers, and Gullible Defenders of Liars

DEAD AGENTING is the proven Technique that Destroys Forever the Credibility
of Perpetrators and their PR Agents

PR Agents, for example, the covert/secret *Bright Future* ECK HI Yahoo Group
that managed PR attacks against Prof. David C. Lane, Ford Johnson (HCS), and
the conga line of Eckankar 'Detractors' on alt.religion.eckankar and the many
Ex-Eckankar Yahoo Groups for over a decade.

Bright Future members included Doug Marman, Rich Smith, Michael Wallace,
Cheryl Grundemann, Steve Runsfeldt, Richard F Pickett, and many more...

PR Agents, for example, the Spiritual Dialogues Project created by Doug Marman.
His 'Dialogues in the Age of Criticism' website, and his published book of lies
and disinformation which was falsely named 'The Whole Truth'.

PR Agents, for example, Brad Steiger, Patti Simpson-Rivinus her Eckankar books,
and her public support of Marman, and Gail Ann Atkinson-Twitchell-Gross-
Anderson-et al by her 'public silence' and 'private disinformation'.

It is a not too infrequent part of the job of a PROFESSIONAL Investigative
Journalist, News Reporter, Documentary Maker, or History Researcher to
encounter hostile contacts. To handle such, one has to be fast and effective
at DEAD AGENTING. Every successful PRO knows how to dead agent and wins.

Knowledge about dead agenting and handling hostile contacts is scattered in
plain sight. Learn these techniques well. Use them with success!

--- --- ---

It is my specific intention that by the use of professional PR tactics, one
on one or in the public arena, ANY opposition be not only dulled but
permanently eradicated.

This takes TRUE DATA and PLANNING before positive action can occur.

Never let one hostile attack pass unhandled. Prevention is better than cure!

Handle fast, handle with live communication, handle with documentation, use
PR technology, communication tools, expertise and understanding of human
Psychology, plus a store of hard evidence at your fingertips.

Maintain personal Integrity and Ethics presence at all times, and see the
matter through to a completion including the Discrediting of the Attacker,
and the real Power Base that is behind them.

--- --- ---

Knowledge, Experience and World History has shown that successful Defense
is only effective when one repeatedly Sorties or Attacks unrelentingly.

The most common errors the innocent victim, naive and gullible have made are:

1. Defending only.

2. Defending on their own Ethical and Values ground.

3. Being reasonable and assigning mild motives to the enemy.

4. Failing to attack early and hard.

5. Assuming true information will change peoples attitudes & minds.

6. Individuating from other similar organizations (analogy won't work).

7. Not learning enemy tactics and using and bettering them.

8. Failing to heavily contest for public opinion and public media.

9. Failing to identify the enemy early and hit him hard.

--- --- ---

The technique of proving utterances false is called "DEAD AGENTING".

It's in the first book of Chinese espionage. When the enemy agent gives
false data, those who believed him but now find it false kill him - or
at least cease to believe him.

So the PR slang for this technique is still called "Dead Agenting."

This consists of disproving utterly the false statement with documents
or demonstration or display.

One has to have a kit (a collection of documents) or the ability to
demonstrate or something to display.

STATEMENT: "I've been told you are in trouble with Income Tax people."

REBUTTAL: "Here's a document of fully paid taxes and a letter of
commendation from the tax authorities." Displays same.

Result? Whoever told him that is now dead with him as an accurate
informer.

The _best_ way to dead agent is when the person makes some disprovable
statement, find WHO to fix his mind on it and then produce the rebuttal.

STATEMENT: "I hear you aren't married to the man you're living with."

REBUTTAL: "_WHO_ told you that?"

STATER: "I forget."

REBUTTER: "Well, you remember and I'll show you some proof."

STATER: "Well, it was a man..."

REBUTTER: "WHO?"

STATER: "Joe Schmo."

REBUTTER: "Okay. Here's my marriage certificate. Who's the Joe Schmo
nut anyway?"

Now it's Joe Schmo who's the mystery. How come he lies? What's in it
for him?

When one hasn't got the document but can get it one can say "You tell me
the name of whoever said that and next time I see you I'll show you
something _very_ interesting about it."

And be sure to get the document and see him again.

Dead Agenting has a billion variations.

"It won't fly." Fly it.

"Place is empty." Show him it's full.

The subject matter of Dead Agenting is PROOF in whatever form.

You only challenge statements you _can_ prove are false and in any
conversation let the rest slide.

EVERY FRIEND, EVERY OPINION LEADER, EVERY STAFF MEMBER YOU HAVE SHOULD
BE SUPPLIED WITH A DEAD AGENT PACK CONTAINING PROOFS AGAINST COMMON
RUMORS AND INNUENDOS (and brochures and coaching to fill the vacuum)

--- --- ---

In defending against Hostile PR Attacks, once more it is in the R - relations -
that really counts.

Sun Tzu in his book about warfare gives several types of agent. One of
these is the "dead agent" because he tells lies to the enemy and when
they find out they will kill him.

Hostile (or counter-PR) is usually only a FABRIC OF LIES.

If one finds out the lies being told and documents just one as being
false, he has made counter-PR recoil. His hearer will never believe him
again. He's 'DEAD'.

In the war between the Truths of detractor-apostate PR and the Lies of
ECKANKAR, the "dead agent" caper has a field day. ECKANKAR PR has been
lying for 40 years. The documented Fact these Lies are Lies is what is
_killing off ECKANKAR_. Nothing else.

You understand, it's not one PR's word against another's. It's one PR's
DOCUMENTS against the other PR's Lies! That is only correct defense PR.

Directly attack the Lies, and prove beyond doubt Lies are what they are!

--- --- ---

The quality of the documentation is a major factor. The PRO should have the
right to check and demand better quality documentation, if it's not up to
standard. One should be very inventive and very creative in the presentation
of his pack. As the false reports are generally repeated over and over and
over again in different ways one can have in stock, so to speak, False Report
correction packs, and logical, factual articles prepared in advance.

This is correct procedure:

1. Spot who is attacking you.

2. Start investigating them promptly for FELONIES or worse using our
own professionals, not outside agencies.

3. Double curve our reply by saying "We welcome an investigation of
THEM."

4. Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the
attackers to the press.

Also press releases should always contain some factor of endurance.
This gives the public the idea that we have and will endure. Examples:

"We are Anonymous ... we will not surrender..."

"For many years now we have stated..."

"We have stood up to such attacks many times and are still surviving and
expanding."

"Since 2008 we have..."

"Eighteen years ago..."

ALWAYS ATTACK in a press release or in any Public Statement.

Speak to the Facts of the matter.

Be clear about well known Psychology attributes and their Affect.

Speak Truth to Power at all times.

Never Defend or Deny.


There is nothing to Defend, and no reason to Deny a thing when it is the Truth!

The truly wise will grasp the nettle of this and then run with it and win!

Peace!