Kinpa ~ Matthew M Sharpe Eckist and Light Force Network "guardian member", wrote:
07/04/15 "You have told me you were a member, but that IS a lie, that is the simple fact of the matter, you are NOT a current member of Eckankar, therefore you are most certainly NOT an ECKist by ANY standards!"
"... and claiming to be an ECKist and yet having no current card....if you'd like to scan a copy of your card and post it here, I would be willing to withdraw that statement, but I think it goes quite a way in proving that YOU have been purposely deceiving others, if not flat out lying...you and your chum have quite a record of this here....."
"There can be NO defamation unless you can prove that what I said was untrue! Put up, or shut up! Prove it or stop claiming it! This is very easy to put to an end, PROVE ME WRONG! Otherwise you have NO defamation case, and neither does sean....all talk...no walk... [...] Sean = LIAR! Richard = Liar! BOTH things are proven! Like it or lump it, which you do is really not my concern, however DO stop ranting and raving LIES and expecting anyone to believe a thing you say!"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/uHSdZQXyfAo/4_6Nek8SI3kJ
-----
July 7th 2015
Kinpa: Prove any of the above...
Etznab: "Also, I didn't know that information about a person's membership was something the head office condoned posting on a public discussion board. I can ask them, but I think it was you who made the false claims. And so much detail you claimed to know about my membership. How did you come by that information? I am serious about this."
Kinpa aka Matthew M Sharpe ECKIST from Michigan USA and Light Force Network:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I am aware of no rule of the head office concerning this, however, since you are now claiming this is the case, how can that be if the information was both wrong and a lie? As always, here you go, contradicting yourself and what you said in the previous paragraph.....if what I said was wrong, that alone would make it NOT information about a person's membership and thereby irrelevant whether as to office rules or in any legal context....so which is it? You cannot have it both ways...simple fact."
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/uHSdZQXyfAo/p44vDJFddXIJ
----
July 5th 2015
ETznab: Prejudiced you are?
Kinpa
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not at all, but you are, not to mention deluded into thinking you have direct evidence when you do not!
Etznab: Telling lies about people even after they repeatedly try to correct you. This shows intent to defame on your part.
Kinpa:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove that in court, you are unable to correct me because you have NO evidence that what you claim is correct to begin with! LOL Hilarious! Call an attorney son! See you in court! Bring sean with you will you? You both have consistently failed to prove ANYTHING! Not MY problem, that one is ALL yours! Enjoy that LOL
The hubris is amazing, after failing to show ANY, not even one percent of direct evidence, you are STILL deluded enough to think that your OPINIONS are evidence! They are not, and there is no defamation on my part....why don't we allow a judge to decide if I have shown intent to defame! You know NOTHING of the law or how it actually works in court, and your friend appears not to know anything about it either! I shall await you BOTH in court! Be sure to show up and bring ALL of your "evidence!" And thank you once again for providing me with the largest laugh I have had for days!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/uHSdZQXyfAo/X1hOYhBrk7sJ