info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Pro-Life position might perhaps be unrealistic
24 views
Skip to first unread message
danie...@gmail.com
Sep 26, 2015, 12:17:10 PM9/26/15
to
If the Roman Catholic Church is so meddlesomely Pro-life, then maybe such Church should take it upon itself to adopt all of the unwanted children that might be born into the world. Such children might perhaps sometimes suffer more when they are allowed to be born than if the had been aborted within the womb. At least within the womb those aborted children might be less cognizant of their own death.
I myself am Pro-choice and am no longer a Roman Catholic at least partly for that reason. I allegedly sired a daughter when I was but a young man of 19 years old, whom I wanted to abort while she was in her mother's womb, but which her mother, my ex-girlfriend, refused to abort (I still wonder to this day whether she was really even my daughter). I feel that having allowed my daughter to be born set me behind, economically speaking, and that I might still feel the effects of that even today.
I am stuck, in light of my financial rut, living with a mother whom I find to be too controlling. And I blame that, at least partly, on the Pro-life position and on a possibly ignorant ex-girlfriend who might have been swayed by such a position. I believe that the Pro-choice cause could almost legally sue the Pro-life cause, in light of such predicaments.
I suggest that perhaps a better motif for the Pro-life position might be that life begins at birth, rather than that life begins at conception. Either that, or perhaps they should teach their flock to totally abstain from sex altogether (yeah, be a "jack-off) rather than use their family planning method of birth control. I tried that method, when I allegedly got my ex-girlfriend pregnant. As you might assume, it did not work out well for me.
My timing was off, I guess. My almost 16-year-old ex-girlfriend assured me that at that point in her menstrual cycle that she would not get pregnant. But she did get pregnant. That's what I get for letting a teenager think for me. I conjecture that she might have been a bit sexually loose too. I am lucky perhaps that I did not catch an STD, or whatever my player cousin Angel might have had. Perhaps I should have used a condom instead?
Other than several occasions of sexual intercourse with such ex-girlfriend, perhaps in light of assuming that I had already gotten her pregnant anyway, I have never had sexual relations with any other woman. (I did possibly "boof" my younger sister to the point of ejaculating on several different occasions when I was in about my mid teens. But contrary to possible lies with regard to such, we did not have penetrating sex of any kind) I might perhaps still feel bound to my ex-girlfriend.
Also, I might be a bit on the ugly side, which also helps to preserve my state of celibacy, even if not of virginity. I almost wanted to try to become a priest at one time. But I might have heard it somewhere that a schizophrenic can not become a priest. Besides, I am no longer a Roman Catholic, as mentioned above, and I also hear the "voice" of an Eternal Word Television Network priest or minister tell me that I am "too dumb to be a priest". (I believe that the priest in question's name might be Mitch Pacwa, but I am not certain of that).
DU
I myself am Pro-choice and am no longer a Roman Catholic at least partly for that reason. I allegedly sired a daughter when I was but a young man of 19 years old, whom I wanted to abort while she was in her mother's womb, but which her mother, my ex-girlfriend, refused to abort (I still wonder to this day whether she was really even my daughter). I feel that having allowed my daughter to be born set me behind, economically speaking, and that I might still feel the effects of that even today.
I am stuck, in light of my financial rut, living with a mother whom I find to be too controlling. And I blame that, at least partly, on the Pro-life position and on a possibly ignorant ex-girlfriend who might have been swayed by such a position. I believe that the Pro-choice cause could almost legally sue the Pro-life cause, in light of such predicaments.
I suggest that perhaps a better motif for the Pro-life position might be that life begins at birth, rather than that life begins at conception. Either that, or perhaps they should teach their flock to totally abstain from sex altogether (yeah, be a "jack-off) rather than use their family planning method of birth control. I tried that method, when I allegedly got my ex-girlfriend pregnant. As you might assume, it did not work out well for me.
My timing was off, I guess. My almost 16-year-old ex-girlfriend assured me that at that point in her menstrual cycle that she would not get pregnant. But she did get pregnant. That's what I get for letting a teenager think for me. I conjecture that she might have been a bit sexually loose too. I am lucky perhaps that I did not catch an STD, or whatever my player cousin Angel might have had. Perhaps I should have used a condom instead?
Other than several occasions of sexual intercourse with such ex-girlfriend, perhaps in light of assuming that I had already gotten her pregnant anyway, I have never had sexual relations with any other woman. (I did possibly "boof" my younger sister to the point of ejaculating on several different occasions when I was in about my mid teens. But contrary to possible lies with regard to such, we did not have penetrating sex of any kind) I might perhaps still feel bound to my ex-girlfriend.
Also, I might be a bit on the ugly side, which also helps to preserve my state of celibacy, even if not of virginity. I almost wanted to try to become a priest at one time. But I might have heard it somewhere that a schizophrenic can not become a priest. Besides, I am no longer a Roman Catholic, as mentioned above, and I also hear the "voice" of an Eternal Word Television Network priest or minister tell me that I am "too dumb to be a priest". (I believe that the priest in question's name might be Mitch Pacwa, but I am not certain of that).
DU
PATRICK
Sep 26, 2015, 12:24:22 PM9/26/15
to
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 09:17:08 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>If the Roman Catholic Church is so meddlesomely Pro-life, then
maybe such Church should take it upon itself to adopt all of the
unwanted children that might be born into the world. Such children
might perhaps sometimes suffer more when they are allowed to be born
than if the had been aborted within the womb. At least within the womb
those aborted children might be less cognizant of their own death.
++Sooooo.... killing them early is better than killing them later?
>If the Roman Catholic Church is so meddlesomely Pro-life, then
maybe such Church should take it upon itself to adopt all of the
unwanted children that might be born into the world. Such children
might perhaps sometimes suffer more when they are allowed to be born
than if the had been aborted within the womb. At least within the womb
those aborted children might be less cognizant of their own death.
W.T.S.-F451
Sep 26, 2015, 3:22:30 PM9/26/15
to
PATRICK <pbark...@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:8khd0b9nmjr84et74...@4ax.com:
No baby is involved in any abortion, "PATRICK"! Stop lying.
<http://tinyurl.com/nrd33o4>
<http://tinyurl.com/p78s6nl>
<http://tinyurl.com/q8ufgvj>
<http://tinyurl.com/nppjsbe>
<http://tinyurl.com/257n5k6>
<http://tinyurl.com/ovqrxv6>
<http://rhrealitycheck.org/>
<http://www.plannedparenthood.org>
<http://www.imnotsorry.net>
<http://www.prochoice.org>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_pro-choice_movement>
news:8khd0b9nmjr84et74...@4ax.com:
<http://tinyurl.com/nrd33o4>
<http://tinyurl.com/p78s6nl>
<http://tinyurl.com/q8ufgvj>
<http://tinyurl.com/nppjsbe>
<http://tinyurl.com/257n5k6>
<http://tinyurl.com/ovqrxv6>
<http://rhrealitycheck.org/>
<http://www.plannedparenthood.org>
<http://www.imnotsorry.net>
<http://www.prochoice.org>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_pro-choice_movement>
duke
Sep 27, 2015, 9:21:04 AM9/27/15
to
>If the Roman Catholic Church is so meddlesomely Pro-life, then maybe such Church should take it upon itself to adopt all of the unwanted children that might be born into the world. Such children might perhaps sometimes suffer more when they are allowed to be born than if the had been aborted within the womb. At least within the womb those aborted children might be less cognizant of their own death.
>I myself am Pro-choice and am no longer a Roman Catholic at least partly for that reason. I allegedly sired a daughter when I was but a young man of 19 years old, whom I wanted to abort while she was in her mother's womb, but which her mother, my ex-girlfriend, refused to abort (I still wonder to this day whether she was really even my daughter). I feel that having allowed my daughter to be born set me behind, economically speaking, and that I might still feel the effects of that even today.
By being pro choice, you accept pro death. We don't. And now you admit you
>I myself am Pro-choice and am no longer a Roman Catholic at least partly for that reason. I allegedly sired a daughter when I was but a young man of 19 years old, whom I wanted to abort while she was in her mother's womb, but which her mother, my ex-girlfriend, refused to abort (I still wonder to this day whether she was really even my daughter). I feel that having allowed my daughter to be born set me behind, economically speaking, and that I might still feel the effects of that even today.
wanted to murder to accomplish your desire for money and fame.
>I am stuck, in light of my financial rut, living with a mother whom I find to be too controlling. And I blame that, at least partly, on the Pro-life position and on a possibly ignorant ex-girlfriend who might have been swayed by such a position. I believe that the Pro-choice cause could almost legally sue the Pro-life cause, in light of such predicaments.
>I suggest that perhaps a better motif for the Pro-life position might be that life begins at birth, rather than that life begins at conception. Either that, or perhaps they should teach their flock to totally abstain from sex altogether (yeah, be a "jack-off) rather than use their family planning method of birth control. I tried that method, when I allegedly got my ex-girlfriend pregnant. As you might assume, it did not work out well for me.
developed.
>My timing was off, I guess. My almost 16-year-old ex-girlfriend assured me that at that point in her menstrual cycle that she would not get pregnant. But she did get pregnant. That's what I get for letting a teenager think for me. I conjecture that she might have been a bit sexually loose too. I am lucky perhaps that I did not catch an STD, or whatever my player cousin Angel might have had. Perhaps I should have used a condom instead?
>Other than several occasions of sexual intercourse with such ex-girlfriend, perhaps in light of assuming that I had already gotten her pregnant anyway, I have never had sexual relations with any other woman. (I did possibly "boof" my younger sister to the point of ejaculating on several different occasions when I was in about my mid teens. But contrary to possible lies with regard to such, we did not have penetrating sex of any kind) I might perhaps still feel bound to my ex-girlfriend.
>Also, I might be a bit on the ugly side, which also helps to preserve my state of celibacy, even if not of virginity. I almost wanted to try to become a priest at one time. But I might have heard it somewhere that a schizophrenic can not become a priest. Besides, I am no longer a Roman Catholic, as mentioned above, and I also hear the "voice" of an Eternal Word Television Network priest or minister tell me that I am "too dumb to be a priest". (I believe that the priest in question's name might be Mitch Pacwa, but I am not certain of that).
the dukester, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
duke
Sep 27, 2015, 9:22:05 AM9/27/15
to
•RLMeasures
Sep 27, 2015, 10:54:03 AM9/27/15
to
In article <9tqf0btaqfhvlrfbe...@4ax.com>, duke
АА Since male souls are too obviously quite different than female souls,
how could a soul be installed before the "unborn baby's sex is established
at 6 weeks. Did Bruce Jenner get a female soul because of some installer
mixup?
End
how could a soul be installed before the "unborn baby's sex is established
at 6 weeks. Did Bruce Jenner get a female soul because of some installer
mixup?
End
PATRICK
Sep 27, 2015, 12:59:18 PM9/27/15
to
>how could a soul be installed before the "unborn baby's sex is established
>at 6 weeks. Did Bruce Jenner get a female soul because of some installer
>mixup?
Nah, he just got tired of all the women in his life getting first
>at 6 weeks. Did Bruce Jenner get a female soul because of some installer
>mixup?
billing, and him always being just an add on accessory.
•RLMeasures
Sep 27, 2015, 2:34:15 PM9/27/15
to
In article <o18g0bh1tfg665t70...@4ax.com>, PATRICK
€€€ That makes sense. I'm wondering how many, if any, hetero dudes
have dated him since he becane a "she".
have dated him since he becane a "she".
Message has been deleted
danie...@gmail.com
Sep 27, 2015, 5:21:47 PM9/27/15
to
>Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a glitch and not much more.
My cousin Angel is male. I once caught him trying to kiss my ex-girlfriend, at a bit after the time that she implied that I had gotten her pregnant. In light of that show of infidelity, I sometimes suspect that my cousin Angel might perhaps at another time without my knowing it haven gotten my ex-girlfriend pregnant. It is really not such a far-fetched suspicion. In retrospect, I consider it to be possible that my ex-girlfriend might perhaps have been a bit on the "loose" side.
I wanted to have a paternity test done to verify whether or not my suspicion was correct. But for some reason my mother kept guilt tripping me about having such a paternity test done, saying that the daughter that my ex-girlfriend had given birth to looked just like me. In light of that, I was the one who payed for the support of my daughter for several years after, even despite my suspicions about about whether or not she was truly my daughter.
My ex-girlfriend and I broke up at least partly because of my suspicions of such sexual relations with my cousin Angel. I never could readily trust her again after that.
DU
danie...@gmail.com
Sep 27, 2015, 6:00:43 PM9/27/15
to
>You can't argue with God.
I am not arguing with God. I might not even be arguing with the bible. I am arguing with the Pro-life position and perhaps also with the Roman Catholic Church.
Have you spoken with God lately?
I think that God understands that we are only human and that human things happen. That's why perhaps soldiers sometimes kill but might be forgiven anyway.
DU
duke
Sep 28, 2015, 7:25:17 AM9/28/15
to
False.
,
>how could a soul be installed before the "unborn baby's sex is established
>at 6 weeks. Did Bruce Jenner get a female soul because of some installer
>mixup?
>End
>how could a soul be installed before the "unborn baby's sex is established
>at 6 weeks. Did Bruce Jenner get a female soul because of some installer
>mixup?
>End
duke
Sep 28, 2015, 7:27:42 AM9/28/15
to
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a glitch and not much more.
I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
>My cousin Angel is male. I once caught him trying to kiss my ex-girlfriend, at a bit after the time that she implied that I had gotten her pregnant. In light of that show of infidelity, I sometimes suspect that my cousin Angel might perhaps at another time without my knowing it haven gotten my ex-girlfriend pregnant. It is really not such a far-fetched suspicion. In retrospect, I consider it to be possible that my ex-girlfriend might perhaps have been a bit on the "loose" side.
duke
Sep 28, 2015, 7:30:11 AM9/28/15
to
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:00:42 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>>You can't argue with God.
>
>I am not arguing with God. I might not even be arguing with the bible. I am arguing with the Pro-life position and perhaps also with the Roman Catholic Church.
Life is sacred comes form God, not the RCC.
>>You can't argue with God.
>
>I am not arguing with God. I might not even be arguing with the bible. I am arguing with the Pro-life position and perhaps also with the Roman Catholic Church.
>Have you spoken with God lately?
>I think that God understands that we are only human and that human things happen. That's why perhaps soldiers sometimes kill but might be forgiven anyway.
the priest in the confessional. You have a problem if you think you can just
blow your mistake off..
PATRICK
Sep 28, 2015, 8:19:39 AM9/28/15
to
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:27:45 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>
>>I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a glitch and not much more.
>
>I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
I don't want to know.
>On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>
>>I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a glitch and not much more.
>
>I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
•RLMeasures
Sep 28, 2015, 3:13:47 PM9/28/15
to
In article <fq8i0bhui8g9ooonf...@4ax.com>, duke
€€ If you think female souls are no different than male souls you must be
a hermit Duke.
a hermit Duke.
•RLMeasures
Sep 28, 2015, 3:16:30 PM9/28/15
to
In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
surprised by that.
<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>
> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
glitch and not much more.
>
> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
АА I seriously doubt that anyone who's been reading your posts is
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>
> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
glitch and not much more.
>
> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
surprised by that.
duke
Sep 29, 2015, 7:58:14 AM9/29/15
to
good over bad, right over wrong. What we, male or female, choose to do about it
is another issue.
duke
Sep 29, 2015, 7:59:34 AM9/29/15
to
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:16:29 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>>
>> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
>sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
>glitch and not much more.
>>
>> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
>
>€€ I seriously doubt that anyone who's been reading your posts is
>In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
>>
>> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
>sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
>glitch and not much more.
>>
>> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
>
>surprised by that.
What did he mean by "boofed"?
•RLMeasures
Sep 29, 2015, 11:52:20 AM9/29/15
to
•RLMeasures
Sep 29, 2015, 11:53:40 AM9/29/15
to
In article <t7vk0bhihohik8jkh...@4ax.com>, duke
<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:16:29 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
> ><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
> >>
> >> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
> >sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
> >glitch and not much more.
> >>
> >> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
> >
> >€€ I seriously doubt that anyone who's been reading your posts is
> >surprised by that.
>
> What did he mean by "boofed"?
>
€€€ coitus
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:16:29 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
> ><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
> >>
> >> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
> >sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
> >glitch and not much more.
> >>
> >> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
> >
> >€€ I seriously doubt that anyone who's been reading your posts is
> >surprised by that.
>
> What did he mean by "boofed"?
>
danie...@gmail.com
Sep 29, 2015, 9:41:45 PM9/29/15
to
>What did he mean by "boofed"?
Boofed means that I grabbed her from behind her around the waste and pressed her buttocks against my groinal region. My wiener got hard and as she moved the rubbing caused me to ejaculate. All of this while both of us wore clothes.
I know, it sounds a bit gross. But I wanted to be honest enough to say it my way, just in case my sister is spreading any lies or hyperbole with regard to exactly what did happen.
Dan
danie...@gmail.com
Sep 29, 2015, 9:43:05 PM9/29/15
to
No, not coitus. Although there might perhaps have been lies told to the contrary.
Exodus 10:16.
Exodus 10:16.
duke
Sep 30, 2015, 7:25:00 AM9/30/15
to
duke
Sep 30, 2015, 7:25:29 AM9/30/15
to
duke
Sep 30, 2015, 7:28:48 AM9/30/15
to
•RLMeasures
Sep 30, 2015, 7:49:29 AM9/30/15
to
In article <b6c4a769-db79-49bf...@googlegroups.com>,
brothers when she was 15.
> Exodus 10:16.
danie...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, not coitus. Although there might perhaps have been lies told to the
contrary.
>
€ chortle. A friend of my younger sister said she seduced her three
> No, not coitus. Although there might perhaps have been lies told to the
contrary.
>
brothers when she was 15.
> Exodus 10:16.
•RLMeasures
Sep 30, 2015, 7:55:11 AM9/30/15
to
In article <6jhn0b5qsgn4f9k3q...@4ax.com>, duke
€€€€ One of us understands that there are male souls and there are female
souls. Maybe Jenner got the wrong one?
souls. Maybe Jenner got the wrong one?
•RLMeasures
Sep 30, 2015, 8:02:57 AM9/30/15
to
In article <ukhn0bd0qu42vhcu4...@4ax.com>, duke
her two older brothers and one younger brother. Sibling hookups are not
nearly as damaging as father/daughter ones like what happened in the Lot
family.
<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:53:39 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <t7vk0bhihohik8jkh...@4ax.com>, duke
> ><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:16:29 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
> >> ><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
> >> >>
> >> >> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
> >> >sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
> >> >glitch and not much more.
> >> >>
> >> >> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
> >> >
> >> >€€ I seriously doubt that anyone who's been reading your posts is
> >> >surprised by that.
> >>
> >> What did he mean by "boofed"?
> >>
> >€€€ coitus
>
> He screwed his sister???
>
€€€€ Sisters also screw brothers Duke. I know of one who hooked up with
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:53:39 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <t7vk0bhihohik8jkh...@4ax.com>, duke
> ><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:16:29 -0700, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <8t8i0b1nmnd7hojco...@4ax.com>, duke
> >> ><duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:10:56 -0700 (PDT), danie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> Your sister and your cousin. You're sick for starters.
> >> >>
> >> >> >I am not that sick. I was in about my mid teens, when I boofed my
> >> >sister, if that is in fact the proper word for it. I consider it to be a
> >> >glitch and not much more.
> >> >>
> >> >> I consider you sick. And I don't even know what "boofed" means.
> >> >
> >> >€€ I seriously doubt that anyone who's been reading your posts is
> >> >surprised by that.
> >>
> >> What did he mean by "boofed"?
> >>
> >€€€ coitus
>
> He screwed his sister???
>
her two older brothers and one younger brother. Sibling hookups are not
nearly as damaging as father/daughter ones like what happened in the Lot
family.
duke
Oct 1, 2015, 7:16:09 AM10/1/15
to
are those that ELECT away from their animation, a man maybe this way or a
woe_man maybe that way, but still a turn away from humankind.
duke
Oct 1, 2015, 7:17:09 AM10/1/15
to
>Sibling hookups are not
>nearly as damaging as father/daughter ones like what happened in the Lot
>family.
•RLMeasures
Oct 1, 2015, 8:03:55 AM10/1/15
to
In article <7a5q0bhiee22vfcno...@4ax.com>, duke
• are you sure?
>It's the animation of (human)kind. Sinners
> are those that ELECT away from their animation, a man maybe this way or a
> woe_man maybe that way, but still a turn away from humankind.
>
• The term "woe_man" sounds misogynistic.
>It's the animation of (human)kind. Sinners
> are those that ELECT away from their animation, a man maybe this way or a
> woe_man maybe that way, but still a turn away from humankind.
>
•RLMeasures
Oct 1, 2015, 8:09:54 AM10/1/15
to
duke
Oct 2, 2015, 7:08:34 AM10/2/15
to
>>It's the animation of (human)kind. Sinners
>> are those that ELECT away from their animation, a man maybe this way or a
>> woe_man maybe that way, but still a turn away from humankind.
>>
>• The term "woe_man" sounds misogynistic.
duke
Oct 2, 2015, 7:09:21 AM10/2/15
to
•RLMeasures
Oct 2, 2015, 9:37:45 AM10/2/15
to
In article <ccps0bpt49fd4jmsp...@4ax.com>, duke
€ The term "Woe" (distress or misery) when associated with women is
pejorative. Are you married to a woeman Duke?
pejorative. Are you married to a woeman Duke?
•RLMeasures
Oct 2, 2015, 9:44:22 AM10/2/15
to
In article <4eps0bpkr8rlsethq...@4ax.com>, duke
• Sally is bi so when she gets a yen for sausage she visits her brothers
for some polyandrous family fun.
>
end
for some polyandrous family fun.
>
end
duke
Oct 3, 2015, 8:25:25 AM10/3/15
to
suckered POOR Adam.
Right form the getgo, the (woe)man was bad news for the man.
duke
Oct 3, 2015, 8:26:21 AM10/3/15
to
•RLMeasures
Oct 3, 2015, 9:09:06 AM10/3/15
to
In article <47iv0b169k97n3dd2...@4ax.com>, duke
•• Why did not "Duke"answer my question? Enquiring minds want to know.
end
end
•RLMeasures
Oct 3, 2015, 9:15:37 AM10/3/15
to
0 new messages