On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:39:59 -0500, Kurt Lochner
<
kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 7/8/2016 6:18 PM, plain.shame wrote:
>>
>> On 7/8/2016 4:46 PM, Kurt Lochner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2016 2:47 PM, Faulty Sham wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Look at this web site and then come back and tell us how great Obama
>>>> is doing.
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.zerohedge.com
>>>
>>> Still citing a discredited communist-run hedge fund blog, hunh?
>>>
>>>
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-29/unmasking-the-men-behind-zero-hedge-wall-street-s-renegade-blog
>>>
>>> After more than a year writing for the financial website Zero Hedge
>>> under the nom de doom of the cult classic’s anarchic hero, Lokey’s going
>>> public. In doing so, he’s answering a question that has bedeviled Wall
>>> Street since the site sprang up seven years ago: Just who is Tyler
>>> Durden, anyway?
>>>
>>> The answer, it turns out, is three people. Following an acrimonious
>>> departure this month, in which two-thirds of the trio traded allegations
>>> of hypocrisy and mental instability, Lokey, 32, decided to unmask
>>> himself and his fellow Durdens.
>>>
>>> Lokey said the other two men are Daniel Ivandjiiski, 37, the
>>> Bulgarian-born former analyst long reputed to be behind the site, and
>>> Tim Backshall, 45, a well-known credit derivatives strategist.
>>> (Bloomberg LP competes with Zero Hedge in providing financial news and
>>> information.)
>>>
>>> In a telephone interview, Ivandjiiski confirmed that the men had been
>>> the only Tyler Durdens on the payroll since Lokey came aboard last year,
>>> but he criticized his former colleague's decision to come forward.
>>> ..
>>> Ivandjiiski worked for a hedge fund before being barred by the Financial
>>> Industry Regulatory Authority in 2008 for insider trading. He didn’t
>>> admit or deny wrongdoing, the agency said. Backshall is a familiar face
>>> on financial news networks who has been quoted by media outlets,
>>> including Bloomberg. His involvement with Zero Hedge, along with that of
>>> Lokey, hasn’t been widely known.
>>> ..
>>> A former “director of contributor success” at website Seeking Alpha,
>>> Lokey said he joined Zero Hedge for $6,000 a month and received an
>>> annual bonus of $50,000, earning more than $100,000 last year. His
>>> salary helped pay the rent on a “very nice” condominium on South
>>> Carolina’s Hilton Head Island, he said. Despite the compensation, he
>>> contends that he left because he disagreed with the site's editorial
>>> vision. “Reality checks are great. But Zero Hedge ceased to serve that
>>> public service years ago,” Lokey wrote. “They care what generates page
>>> views. Clicks. Money.”
>>> ..
>>> Lokey, who said he wrote much of the site’s political content, claimed
>>> there was pressure to frame issues in a way he felt was disingenuous. “I
>>> tried to inject as much truth as I could into my posts, but there’s no
>>> room for it. “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent
>>> leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history
>>> of statecraft,” Lokey wrote, describing his take on the website's
>>> politics. Ivandjiiski countered that Lokey could write “anything and
>>> everything he wanted directly without anyone writing over it.”
>>>
>>>
>>> *>LOL!<* You've been 'had', over and over again, slaphead!..
>>
>> Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest to avoid
>> calling people derogatory or defamatory names
>
>
>You've again contradicted yourself with your 'thesis' statement..
>
>
>> HOWEVER, in your case, there is no sense in tap dancing around it
>
>
>Yes, you quite simply are ignorant of the entire subject of
>economics, and simply 'cherry-pick' the figures to suit your
>conclusions.
>
>> The fallacy of your response is called "attacking the messenger".
>
>
>Like you just didn't do the very same thing, now how'd that go?
>
>
>"Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest
> to avoid calling people derogatory or defamatory names"
>
>
>> It fell and has never recovered to the LOWEST pre recession level
>
>
>Only according to you, with your distinct lack of formal knowledge..
>
>> The OBAMA failed recovery
>
>
>Again, only according to your skewed, prejudicial 'facts'..
Lochner wants to imagine that there is a "recovery" yet he has to live
with his mom...
This is from Kurt 'Licknuts' Lochner who incorrectly claimed that
adjusted gross income was gross income minus deductions and
exemptions... Perhaps Licknuts always had his mommy do his taxes...