Copy of FULL document filed by DOUG GRANT...

[Mac]

Here is the copy of the full document filed in the STATE of WASHINGTON
back in May, 2007
Good luck in reading through many of the "claims", the "charges"...
-Mac, the Medic

*********** *********** *********
Douglas G. Reiman v. John Does et al Civil Action DocketNo.___________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT
TACOMA
CIVIL ACTION: DOCKET NO. ___________
AS DOUGLMAGN . RAE I O(UAG/K / D GRANT),
PLAINTIFF
-AGAINSTJOHN AND JANE DOES (1-1000),
AB C ENTITIES/CORPORATIOSN (1-100 0),
JOHN AND JANE ROES (1-1000),
DEFENDANTS

COMPLA INT
______________________________________________________________
DOUGL A S G. REIM AN
PLAINTIFF PRO SE
8__ R____ DRIVE .
RIDGEFIELD, WA 98642
(360) 7__-____
EMAIL: DGVREIMAN@_______.NET

PARTIES TO THIS COMPLAINT

TO THE NAMED DEFENDANTS: Douglas G. Reiman, the Plaintiff pro se
herein, alleges upon information, belief and knowledge with respect to
his own
acts, and upon information and belief with respect to all other
matters, as follows:
PLAINTIFF
(1.1). Plaintiff Douglas G. Reiman is currently an individual citizen
of the
state of Washington, and was a citizen of that state, for the time
covered by the
complaint.
(1.1)(a.) Plaintiff�s address is:
8__ R____ Drive, Ridgefield, Wa, 98642 TeL; 360-7__-4___, Clark
County.
DEFENDANTS
(1.2). Defendants:
(1.3). Defendants John and Jane Does 1-100 are those individuals, as
yet
unidentified by their Internet Service Providers, Agents, Web Hosts
and Proxy
Servers, who participated in, and/or are liable, culpable, responsible
for or
contributed to, or enabled, threats of death and violence against
Plaintiff, the
Internet and USENET publications, emails, all other publications,
contacts and
transfers to third parties, web sites, telephone calls, mailings,
conversations,
third party contacts and meetings, USENET posts, messages, computer
hacking,
malicious interference with Plaintiff�s business and trade, copyright
infringements, forgeries, false accusations, impersonations, filing
false and
malicious criminal complaints, filing false applications and providing
false
information to US Government agencies, Web Sites and Home Pages that
are
the subject of this complaint. All individual Defendant gang members
hereinafter are known as the �Defendants.�

(1.4). Defendants ABC Entities/Corporations and Government agencies
(1-
100) are those entities and/or corporations, or other business
entities, as yet
unidentified, and who may be responsible, liable and/or culpable for
the actions
pleaded herein. These entities include but are not limited to Internet
service
providers, anonymous re-mailers, agents, proxy servers, web page
hosters and
creators, domain name holding entities, government agencies, law
enforcement
agencies and officers, and all individuals and/or all business
entities that have
advertised on, received advertising income from, gained clients from,
or
otherwise attempted to sell or sold products or services on the
Defendants�
numerous web pages, enabled or contributed to such activities,
including but not
limited to news servers that allowed criminal activity by their
clients on
USENET after those servers were specifically notified of such alleged
criminal
activity, insurance or all other companies that provide coverage to
any and all
individual John and Jane Does, ABC Entities/Corporations, John and
Jane
Roes, or any and all other individuals, entities or businesses,
vicarious and/or
contributory, that were involved in the creation, posting,
transmission, or
otherwise profiting from in any manner the transfer, publication,
conspiracy
and/or storage of the materials, publications or conveyances, which
are subject of
this complaint.

(1.5). Defendants John and Jane Roes 1-1000 for those individuals, as
yet
unidentified, who were and/or are agents, representatives,
advertisers, employee
or servants of the above ABC entities/corporations or John Doe
Defendants,
acting on those defendants� behalf for Defendants� benefit, or to
assist
Defendants in their smear, torture, intimidation and harassment
campaign
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4
against Plaintiff, or were acting within the scope of their agency and
employment, and/or with the knowledge and consent of the ABC or John
and
Jane Does defendants.
_______________________________________________________________
Douglas G. Reiman
Plaintiff Pro Se
810 Raven Drive
Ridgefield, WA 98642
_______________________________________________________________
OVERVIEW OF CASE
Background:
(1.6). Plaintiff has attempted every way possible to avoid this
litigation.
Plaintiff and his lawyer have sent hundreds of cease and desist
requests to
Defendants begging Defendants to cease their unlawful acts against
Plaintiff.
Plaintiff has even proposed amnesty from legal action if Defendants
would
retract and remove all previous defaming and threatening publications
from
Google archives, and agree to stop publishing and perpetrating
wrongful acts
against Plaintiff.

(1.7). In each case, and regardless of Plaintiff�s constant begging
Defendants to cease and desist their wrongful acts and agree to his
proposals to
avoid litigation, the Defendants have responded to both Plaintiff and
his
Attorney�s cease and desist requests and proposals to avoid litigation
with
arrogant libel, false accusations, harassment, obloquy, intimidation
and taunts for
Plaintiff to take legal action against them, and have further stated
the Defendants
believe such legal action would be too expensive or time consuming for
Plaintiff
to undertake.

(1.8). Plaintiff writes Blogs and posts them on USENET that support
the
Government polices of the United States and Israel in regards to their
respective
wars against terror. Many of these Blogs are extremely popular. Some
are not
popular. Plaintiff posted articles and Blogs on USENET to first
determine, via
Google star ratings, the popularity of the article or Blog. Plaintiff
implemented
this procedure to determine which articles or Blogs would be used in a
chapter
that would be contained in Plaintiff�s forthcoming book(s). Many
defendants
vehemently oppose the opinions of Plaintiff yet instead of dealing
with or
debating Plaintiff�s opinions, the Defendants instead defame and libel
Plaintiff
personally. The Defendants typically snip out and attempt to hide
Plaintiff�s
articles, and replace his articles with volumes of personal attacks
and defamation
about Plaintiff.
(1.8)(a). The common purpose and joint enterprise of Defendants�
deliberate harassment campaign against Plaintiff is obvious, clear and
unmistakable in many different respects.

(1.9). Plaintiff is a recognized world-class expert on casino games,
and
card counting procedures in respect to the game of Blackjack.
Plaintiff holds
eight copyrights on courses of study in respect to card counting in
the casino
game of Blackjack. The New Jersey Casino Control commission has
referred to
Plaintiff as a �renown expert� on the game of Blackjack, and many
�card
counters� have libeled Plaintiff is the foremost expert on the game of
Blackjack
in the world. Plaintiff has also written Blogs pertaining to casino
procedures in
respect to the game of Blackjack. Plaintiff has further appeared in
court as an
expert witness in respect to several lawsuits involving casinos or
card counting.
(Please review Exhibit �D� for more information in this regard).

(1.10). Plaintiff is not a public figure, and is a private citizen
residing in
Washington, State, USA. The events described herein as a basis for
this action by
Plaintiff all occurred in the State of Washington.
(1.11). All of the Defendants have a history of initiating and
parroting
publications on USENET that contain personal attacks, harassment and
defamation against many different target victims, including Plaintiff.

(1.12). On-line and USENET Smear Merchant gangs operate under the
belief they are above the law because they represent a great number of
Defendants, and they deliberately produce voluminous amounts of
actionable
evidence and documents to a degree the Smear Merchant gang believes it
would
cost their victim millions of dollars in Lawyer fees to sift through
their combined
and orchestrated voluminous defaming and threatening publications and
overt
actionable acts. Not to mention the cost and time it would require to
discover the
gang�s true identities via subpoenas. Hence this Pro Se lawsuit.
However,
Plaintiff has retained counsel to act as a coach and advisor, and
Plaintiff does
expect to be able to afford a full time lawyer once this litigation is
ready to go to
deposition and/or trial.

COMPLAINT
(1.13) Starting in 1996 and continuing through this date, Plaintiff
has
been defamed, harassed, threatened with violence and death, libeled,
stalked,
harassed, and has suffered numerous character assassinations, false
accusations,
obloquy and copyright infringements, collectively numbering more than
thirty
five Hundred (3500) such wrongful acts up to and including the date of
this
complaint, and on information and belief, such wrongful acts are
continuing
against Plaintiff through this very date.

(1.14). A confederation of smear merchants that regularly terrorizes
victims on USENET was apparently convinced by individuals that had
been
defaming and harassing Plaintiff for years over his past lawsuits
against the
casinos for cheating, and for political ideological differences, to
launch a wellplanned
and well-orchestrated smear campaign against Plaintiff. (Please review
Exhibits �A� and �D� for more specific information in respect to this
issue).

(1.15). Starting in 1996 and continuing at a steady rate through the
date of
this complaint, the said Defendant predatory stalking gang members
conspired,
acted with a common purpose and/or acted as a joint enterprise, with
knowledge
of the gang�s intent and consequences, to use the Internet, email,
personal
contact, web sites, home pages, USENET, telephones and other means of
electronic communication, and the US Mails, public and private
meetings, third
party contacts, and the spoken word, as a means to repeatedly publish,
direct,
send and otherwise communicate electronically and otherwise through
interstate commerce, over an extended period of time representing at
least
twenty-three months, patently offensive, forged, misrepresented,
defaming,
libelous, threatening, extremely personal, fraudulent, lewd, and
otherwise
injurious, tortuous, defaming and unlawfully harassing publications
and
communications about Plaintiff, and to regularly and systematically
infringe on
Plaintiff�s copyrights and use such infringements for profit and/or
income, fame,
and attention.

(1.16). Starting in 1996 and continuing through the date of this
action,
said defaming publications, threats and other actionable acts
perpetrated by
Defendants against Plaintiff were conducted by the Defendant gang
members for
the deliberate, reckless and/or negligent purposes to psychologically
torture,
harass, stalk, cause extreme emotional harm and distress, cause mental
anguish,
annoy, intimidate, threaten with violence and death, embarrass,
discredit, and
deliberately, recklessly and/or negligently generally defame and
disgrace
Plaintiff, destroy his reputation, assassinate his character, destroy
his business
and employment opportunities, defame him internationally and to all
others
including his family, and cause him to be shunned and avoided, and to
deliberately injure Plaintiff in every manner including but not
limited to his trade
and occupation.
(1.17). Starting in 1996 and continuing at a steady rate through the
date of
this complaint, the Defendant gang members enabled, conspired and/or
acted in
concert, or acted with a common purpose and/or as a joint enterprise,
to use
multifaceted nefarious and unlawful means and techniques to:

a. Invade the privacy of Plaintiff.
B. Hack into Plaintiff�s computer without authorization and steal both
Plaintiff�s and his family�s personal information and trade secrets.
C. Forge Plaintiff�s name to US Government forms requesting military
and
personal records.

D. Forge Plaintiff�s name to electronic communications and USENET
posts.
E. Repeatedly publish through international commerce false and forged
FBI reports about Plaintiff.
F. Falsely and repeatedly publish through international commerce that
Plaintiff is a pedophile, and a child pornographer.
G. Repeatedly threaten Plaintiff with violence and death and publish
those
threats through international commerce.
H. Maliciously file a false criminal complaint against Plaintiff.
I. Repeatedly publish through international commerce defaming and
false
information in respect to Plaintiff�s participation in past lawsuits
against the
casinos and their agents.

(1.18). Defendants through international commerce repeatedly stalked,
tortured, harassed, and tormented Plaintiff by almost every
psychological means
and process imaginable, including but not limited to:
A. Publicly and through international commerce impersonating an U.S.
Army General Officer to defame Plaintiff�s military records.
B. Publicly and through international commerce misleading Plaintiff to
believe a Defendant gang leader was a Federal Agent and was in that
capacity
confirming the false accusations published by the Defendants.

C. Publicly and through international commerce, misrepresenting that
harassing and libelous publications about Plaintiff were coming from
an agent of
the US Army.
D. Publicly and through international commerce, lying about and/or
misrepresenting and deliberately omitting key contents of Plaintiff�s
military
records for the purpose of defaming Plaintiff and to paint Plaintiff
in a false light.
E. Publicly and through international commerce, maliciously forging,
distorting and altering what Plaintiff might have written and
published or dictated
to be published in the past so as to distort, falsify and force such
writings to
appear untrue or as preposterous false claims of military bravado.
F. Repeatedly forging and publishing through international commerce
false defaming and incriminating FBI Freedom of Information Reports
about
Plaintiff.
G. Repeatedly publishing through international commerce false criminal
accusations against Plaintiff for child pornography and pedophile.
H. Repeatedly publishing through international commerce defaming
F.A.Q.�s (Frequently Asked Questions) about Plaintiff that were
originally
published by casino agents that were �Res Judicata� proved false.

(1.19). Staring in March 2002, and continuing through the date of this
action, Defendants further repeatedly published through international
commerce
fraudulent statements of fact that Plaintiff is a wife beater, a
convicted criminal,
rapist, war criminal, cannibal, a murderer, a car thief, a self
proclaimed false war
hero, a person that claims he possesses military medals he does not
possess, a
mental patient, a person that received a bad discharge from the US
Army, a
person that has been and is committed to a mental institution, a
person that is
insane and mentally incompetent, a person that takes mind altering
drugs, a
person that desperately needs mental medical attention, that
Plaintiff�s Veteran
Administration benefits are false or based upon fraudulent service
connected
events, that Plaintiff�s references to his combat experiences in war
are all false,
that Plaintiff was lying when he said he served Vietnam, that
Plaintiff was lying
when he said he served in the US Military, that Plaintiff was lying
when he said
he once held the rank of SFC E-7 (Platoon Sergeant) in Vietnam, that
Plaintiff
was lying when he said he performed duties other than administrative
duties in
Vietnam and elsewhere in the US Military, that Plaintiff falsely
claimed he was a
2nd Lieutenant in Vietnam, that Plaintiff is a person that published
he killed
babies in Vietnam, published he was placed in tiger cages in Vietnam,
published he played Russian roulette in Vietnam, and that Plaintiff
published he
was a �sooper duper OCS,� and that Plaintiff falsely published he was
�A cross
border assassin,� and that Plaintiff falsely published he attended
military War
Colleges, that Plaintiff lied when he stated in a Blog he completed
CBR training,
that Plaintiff lied when he stated in a Blog he attended RVN combat
training, and
many other similar false and defaming accusations and obloquy
published
repeatedly through international commerce by Defendants about
Plaintiff that
were clearly designed to paint Plaintiff in a defaming false light in
respect to his
military service, past business enterprises, experiences and training.

(1.20). Starting in 1996 and continuing at a steady rate through the
date
of this complaint, fr the deliberate, reckless and/or negligent
purposes of
harming Plaintiff�s trade and occupation which is partially based
almost
exclusively upon Plaintiff�s perceived mathematical prowess and
competency by
the public in respect to his field and speciality, Defendants, while
acting with a
common purpose and as a joint enterprise, (gang) further used the
internet,
email, USENET and other means of communication to fraudulently publish
through international commerce that Plaintiff was the author and
attorney of a
lawsuit against the casino industry for cheating that was falsely and
erroneously
denigrated and discredited via an advisory opinion on merits by a
District Court
Judge for the complaint�s alleged false composition and mathematical
conclusions.

(1.21). Starting in March 2005 and continuing through the date of this
complaint, the Defendant gang members� further harmed Plaintiff�s
business
reputation by deliberately and/or negligently lying by omission in
respect to
hiding the fact that all independent experts assigned, referred to or
were involved
in the said casino case (working for both sides) agreed with Plaintiff
in respect to
his mathematical conclusions and charges the casinos were secretly
altering the
game of Blackjack in the casino�s favor, including math professors
from the
University of Pennsylvania, Cal State University, and two of the most
prestigious
law professors in the USA that were also experts on Casino Gambling
and the
Law.
(1.21)(a). Defendants further published blatantly false information
in respect to Plaintiff�s claims of casino cheating for the purpose of
further
defaming Plaintiff in his business and occupation. Please review
�Exhibit �D�
�Casino Lawsuit Connection� for further information in this regard.
Defendants
initially used the guise of �verifying Plaintiff�s military records�
to initiate their
defamation and smear campaign against Plaintiff, yet Defendants did,
while
acting as a gang with a common purpose, publish hundreds of casino
related
articles all deliberately supporting the casinos and defaming
Plaintiff�s claims of
casino cheating. Such defamation clearly had nothing to do with
Plaintiff�s past
military service.

(1.22). Starting in March 2005 and continuing through the date of this
complaint, the Defendants further, repeatedly and recklessly infringed
on the
copyrights and intellectual property of Plaintiff, even after
Plaintiff warned
defendants to cease and desist such infringements several times. Said
defamation, libel, obloquy, �lies by omission� and copyright
infringements
repeatedly perpetrated by Defendants were clearly, deliberately and/or
negligently designed to defame and torture Plaintiff, generally defame
and
disgrace Plaintiff, assassinate his character, destroy his reputation
and cause him
to be shunned and avoided, and to injure Plaintiff in respect to his
trade and
occupation.
(1.23). Starting in April 2005, and continuing at a steady rate
through the
date of this complaint, Defendants did create not less than eight
international and
income producing Web Sites based upon flagrant and multiple copyright
infringements of Plaintiff�s copyrighted and intellectual property,
and based upon
the false controversy Defendants� deliberately, recklessly and/or
negligently
created on USENET about Plaintiff with the repeated use of fraud,
false
accusations, forgeries, obloquy, libel, torture, harassment and
stalking of
Plaintiff.
(1.24). Starting in April 2005, and continuing at a steady rate
through the
date of this complaint, the Defendants� published their said defaming
and
unlawful publications about Plaintiff, including their false
accusations, libel and
obloquy and other unlawful publications, including flagrant violations
of
Plaintiff�s copyrighted materials on said web sites, and then sold or
bartered
advertising space, sold or bartered products from businesses they were
directly
involved with or were acting as agents thereof, and advertised or sold
other
products on said web sites for monetary and other types of gain and/or
compensation.

(1.14)(a). The incredibly egregious, fallacious and false controversy
about Plaintiff the Defendant gang members deliberately created on
USENET,
(based upon said unlawful acts against Plaintiff) was clearly designed
to gain
�hits� (accesses by patrons) on said money making web sites, and these
defaming
web sites about Plaintiff were also sent by Defendant gang members
directly and
through international commerce to recipients throughout the world, and
sent to
numerous third party organizations, businesses and key individuals to
further the
expansion of Defendant gang members� racketeering and fraud.

(1.25). Starting in 1996 and continuing at a steady rate through the
date
of this complaint, Defendants did publish through international
commerce
repeated threats of injury, violence and death against Plaintiff.
Defendants used
threats of injury and death, and initiated malicious prosecution
against Plaintiff
to intimidate Plaintiff to (1) stop exercising his First Amendment
Constitutional
right to publish his works and opinions, (2) to stop Plaintiff from
responding
with rebuttals to the Defendant�s harassment and obloquy on USENET
which
proved Defendant�s defaming statements about Plaintiff were false and
fraudulent, (3) to harass and stalk Plaintiff to a point to cause him
and his family
extreme emotional distress, trepidation, mental anguish, and the
belief that
Defendants would indeed carry out their threats of violence and death
against
Plaintiff, (4) to coerce and intimidate Plaintiff from reopening his
schools and
publishing his book(s) and courses of study and to defame Plaintiff
and paint
Plaintiff in a false light to his client base, (5) to coerce and
intimidate Plaintiff to
not take legal action to stop Defendants organized and common purpose
gang
harassment, stalking and threats against Plaintiff , and (6) to
intimidate Plaintiff
from notifying the Defendants that Plaintiff believed they were using
smear
campaigns, fraud, forgeries, false accusations and obloquy against
Plaintiff for
the purpose of harassment, stalking, libel, and that Defendants were
infringing on
Plaintiff�s copyrights.

(1.26). To review just a few actual samples of the actionable acts
perpetrated by Defendants against Plaintiff please review Exhibit �B�
Samples of
Defamation, Obloquy, etc... published by Defendants against Plaintiff,
and
Exhibit �C� samples of threats of violence and death published by
Defendants
about Plaintiff.

FEDERAL JURISDICTION AND VENUE
(1.27). THIS IS AN ACTION BROUGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
QUESTION JURISDICTION, TITLE 28 U.S.C. � 1331, AND RICO,
18 U.S.C. � 1961, AND DIVERSITY.
(1.28). ALL THE STATE CLAIMS ARISE OUT OF THE SAME
OPERATIVE FACTS AS THE FEDERAL CLAIMS. THE JURISDICTION
OVER THESE STATE STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW CLAIMS IS BASED
ON SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1367, SECTIONS
(A) AND C, AND THE DOCTRINES OF PENDENT AND ANCILLARY
JURISDICTION.
(1.29). THIS IS COMPLEX, MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION. THE
ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF DEFENDANTS ARE CURRENTLY UNKNOWN.
PLAINTIFF DEMANDS THE RIGHT TO AMEND THIS COMPLAINT WHEN
THE TRUE IDENTITIES AND LOCATIONS OF DEFENDANTS ARE REVEALED
BY THEIR RESPECTIVE INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS.
(1.30). Venue is properly laid in this District under
28 U.S.C. � 1391 (b)(2).

GANG CONSPIRACY, COMMON PURPOSE,
JOINT ENTERPRISE, ENABLING AND
CONTRIBUTING.
(1.31). On belief and knowledge, it is alleged that all Defendants
named
herein represent either (1) the primary infringers or violators who
have enabled,
orchestrated or directed the actionable acts listed against Plaintiff
listed in the
causes of action provided below and elsewhere in attached exhibits, or
(2) have
incurred an equal culpability and liability the same as the Primary
infringers by
acting as Contributory infringers, violators and enablers to the said
actionable
acts listed against Plaintiff, and/or (3) have incurred an equal
culpability and
liability the same as the Primary infringers by acting as Vicarious
infringers,
violators and enablers to the said actionable acts perpetrated against
Plaintiff, or
(4) represent actual conspirators or co-conspirators to said
actionable acts listed
against Plaintiff herein.
(1.32) The clear and obvious purpose of the primary infringers,
conspirators, co-conspirators and contributory Defendants was to
enable,
contribute to and/or perpetrate with a common purpose and as a joint
enterprise,
all actionable acts alleged herein against Plaintiff, thereby
incurring joint liability
for all actionable acts perpetrated by all Defendants against
Plaintiff. All
Defendants either made a material contribution to the overt actionable
acts stated
herein against Plaintiff, and/or had knowledge their acts would
enable, incite,
systemize and further the said overt actionable acts against Plaintiff
that are the
subject of this complaint.
(1.33). Defendants further conspired, enabled, contributed to and
acted
conjointly and contiguously as a gang, or mob, with a common purpose
and as a
joint enterprise to perpetrate thousands of actionable overt acts
against Plaintiff
as are listed in the causes of action herein. Defendants are therefore
equally,
jointly and severally culpable, liable and responsible for the actions
and acts of
all Defendants and each individual Defendant gang member has therefore
become the agent or partner of every other individual Defendant gang
member in
respect to all wrongful and actionable acts stated herein perpetrated
against
Plaintiff.
(1.34). In consideration of the gang stalking descriptions by
independent
authorities and experts on gang stalking and mobbing, ( as listed in
Exhibit �A�
and attached to this complaint) and the clear fact the Defendants
actuated and
often schemed, conspired and strategized together, proclaimed their
common
purpose, and operated as a joint enterprise to harm Plaintiff, and
incited other
gang members, contributors, enablers and conspirators to also
initiate, perpetrate,
parrot, contribute to and ingeminate gang or mob joint enterprise
actionable acts
against Plaintiff, as are stated herein as a basis for this complaint,
therefore,

(1.35). Under the provisions of U.S.C. � 18, 371 in respect to (1)
defrauding FBI and Freedom of Information applications and reports
about
Plaintiff, (2) causing a file to be started on Plaintiff in a Federal
Agency, (3)
contacting the Veterans Administration Hospital and other US
Government
agencies and providing them with false and misleading information
about
Plaintiff, and including all other applicable State and Federal
conspiracy statutes
including but not limited to RCW 9A.28.040, Plaintiff hereby claims
and asserts
that all named Defendants, (and other John and Jane Doe;s, ABC
Corporations,
and/or other unnamed Defendants yet to be uncovered from their aliases
or to be
determined via discovery) are equally, jointly and severally culpable,
liable and
responsible for actuating all overt and actionable acts perpetrated
against
Plaintiff by all Defendants, and are further responsible, culpable and
liable for
all other actionable acts against Plaintiff to be determined at a
later date, the
same as if he or she was the specific individual Defendant that
actually
perpetrated the overt and/or actionable act against Plaintiff listed
in �Causes of
Action� herein.
(1.36) For detailed descriptions of gang stalking operations, and
the effects such harassment and smear gangs have on their victims,
please review
Exhibit �A� �Gang Stalking References� which provides a detailed
listing of web
sites of organizations and victim groups, including professional
conclusions in
respect to the impact such mobbing or gang stalking is having on our
society and
on their victims in general. These web sites have been produced by
victims that
have been subjected to the same gang or mob stalking and harassment as
Plaintiff.

CLARITY OF PURPOSE OF DEFENDANTS AND
THEIR BUSINESS ENTITIES
(1.37). Defendants have clearly demonstrated a deliberate and/or
negligent pattern of conduct that proves their clarity of purpose and
deliberate,
reckless and/or negligent course of conduct to torture, harass, stalk,
libel,
defame, demean, disgrace and create extreme emotional distress and
harm, fear
of death, fear of physical attack, mental anguish and extreme
trepidation in
Plaintiff and Plaintiff�s family. Said pattern and clarity of purpose
of Defendants
were demonstrated by Defendants conspiring together, operating
together,
enabling, inciting, contributing, acting with a common purpose, and
operating as
a joint enterprise in respect to the actionable overt acts perpetrated
against
Plaintiff by Defendants as are specified herein. See Exhibit
_________.

(1.38). Defendants did operate with a common purpose, contribute to,
enable, incite, and function as a joint enterprise to perpetrate said
actionable acts
against Plaintiff from their residences and from their business or
employment
entities, and did often use and operate personal and business owned
property to
perpetrate, incite, contribute to, and enable all actionable acts
listed herein
against Plaintiff. On information and belief it is believed the
business entities
and employers of Defendants were well aware of the Defendants� actions
in
respect to Plaintiff, and thereby are equally and at least vicariously
liable,
responsible and culpable for the actions of their Defendants gang
member
employees, officers, owners, directors or agents.

CAUSES OF ACTION
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Defamation, Defamation Per Se, Injurious
Falsehoods)
(1.39). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth
above with the same force and effect as if set forth again in full.
(1.40). On or about the dates set forth above, said Defendants and/or
their
agents maliciously prepared, composed and permanently memorialized, of
and
concerning Plaintiff the writings set forth in those paragraphs above
and herein
with a reckless disregard for the truth, or knowledge of its falsity
and pursuant to
a preconceived policy and intent to injure Plaintiff.
(1.41). Defendants republished and sent defamatory statements in
postings and publications about Plaintiff to various USENET
newsgroups, Web
Sites, Emails, and deliberately sent and delivered said defamation
about Plaintiff
to dozens of other third parties, including but not limited to Federal
Agencies of
the United States, and invaded the privacy of Plaintiff, and held
Plaintiff in a
false light. These defaming and false statements, and republishing,
were
initiated although the Defendants were repeatedly informed by
Plaintiff their
false interpretations and out of context defaming distortions of what
Plaintiff,
and/or his associates that were also posting information on USENET out
of the
same account, or others unknown to Plaintiff that had hacked into
Plaintiff�s
computer posted on USENET in the past, were untrue, false, defaming,
and
represented forgeries, distortions and false interpretations of
Plaintiff�s and
others� past publications. The Defendants were well aware, and knew
the
information they were publishing about Plaintiff was untrue, or did so
in reckless
disregard for the truth.

(1.42). The said defamatory distortions of past writings by Plaintiff,
false defaming accusations, false statements and other obloquy
Defendants�
published and delivered against Plaintiff have been published, revised
and
republished on numerous occasions, and on information and belief
continue to
be republished to this day in cyberspace.
(1.43). Until the publication and continuing re-publication of the
obloquy and defamatory material by Defendants, Plaintiff enjoyed a
good
reputation for honesty, uprightness of character, competence and
truthfulness.
(1.44). To the extent possible, Plaintiff has posted several rebuttals
and
requests for retractions of Defendants obloquy, threats, libelous and
false
statements about Plaintiff on USENET and on Defendants� web sites, and
has
further posted on USENET and E-mailed several pleas for the Defendants
to
cease and desist their gang harassment, stalking, torture, defamation,
copyright
violations, threats, forgeries, and other wrongful acts the Defendants
regularly
perpetrate against Plaintiff.

(1.45). The Defendants have refused all requests to cease and desist
such
said acts, and have responded to Plaintiff�s lawyer�s cease and desist
demands
with taunting and further obloquy about Plaintiff, and Defendants
continue to
this day to refuse to retract nor cease and desist their thousands of
offensive,
harassing, threatening, defaming, libelous and tortuous publications
that are
clearly meant to defame, intimidate, threaten, harass, character
assassinate, and
otherwise harm Plaintiff and his family.
(1.46). On many occasions Defendants also taunted and dared Plaintiff
to
take Defendant�s wrongful and actionable acts against Plaintiff into a
legal
arena.
(1.47). Such malicious publication and continuing re-publication of
defamation, and the continued malicious perpetration of other
actionable and
wrongful acts against Plaintiff are intended to convey, and did
convey, the
holding of Plaintiff up to public and professional scorn, hatred and
ridicule, and
intended to mean, among other things, that Plaintiff was incompetent
or was a
convicted criminal, a child molester, a dealer or a user of child
pornography, has
been diagnosed as a psychopath, has been investigated for criminal
activities by
the FBI, was a convicted criminal, filed false reports to gain
Veteran�s benefits,
was a murderer, a war criminal, a torturer of enemy prisoners, lied
about
participating in combat during Plaintiff�s military service, a
murderer of
unarmed priests, a child rapist, a cannibal, and all was so understood
by the
readers of the false and defaming publications stating such defamation
and false
accusations.
(1.48). Defendants repeatedly created, used, and incited and enabled
others to use, and published and repeatedly sent through international
commerce, speech that "is directed to inciting or producing imminent
lawless
action and is likely to induce or produce such action."

(1.49). The Defendants published the said obloquy and other
actionable publications about Plaintiff with actual malice, and with
wrongful
and willful intent to injure Plaintiff in order to expose Plaintiff to
hatred,
ridicule, contempt, and obloquy, and to cause Plaintiff to be shunned
and
avoided and to injure Plaintiff�s standing in his profession and
occupation, and
to injure Plaintiff in reputation and good standing in the communities
in which
he worked, as well as among his peers, and worldwide through the
Internet,
USENET and international Web Sites.
(1.50). As a direct and proximate result of the acts of the
Defendants,
Plaintiff�s future prospects for employment or business opportunities
and book
publication were materially affected and permanently harmed, lessened
and
decreased.
(1.51). The Defendants� acts as described herein constitute (among
other
actionable acts) libel and/or libel per se, cyberstalking, defamation,
unlawful
harassment and cyberharassment.
(1.52). The false and misleading statements as published and/or
uttered
by the Defendants were also injurious falsehoods.
(1.53). The Defendants uttered and/or furnished false and misleading
information, intentionally, maliciously and/or recklessly and without
regard to
the consequences, and with full knowledge of the falsity of that
information, or
in reckless disregard for the falsity of that information,
communicated and/or
published that information to non-privileged third parties, when those

Defendants knew and/or should have reasonably anticipated that the
false and
misleading information would severely damage Plaintiff.
(1.53)(a). The Defendants, after receiving a rebuttal from Plaintiff
of
their published defamation and falsehoods containing irrefutable proof
their
defaming interpretations and distortions of Plaintiff�s past
publications were
false or deliberately taken out of context, and after receiving dozens
of notices to
cease and desist the wrongful acts against Plaintiff stated herein,
Defendants
refused to cease and desist such acts, and dared and taunted Plaintiff
to take
legal action to stop the Defendants from perpetrating their wrongful
acts against
Plaintiff and his family.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Assault and Battery, Harassment,
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
(1.54). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth
above and herein with the same force and effect as if set forth again
in full.
(1.55). Defendants intended to cause death or injury in Plaintiff, and
intended to cause harmful or offensive physical contact with
Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff was put in apprehension of such contact.
(1.56). Defendants did, by their extreme and outrageous conduct,
intentionally or recklessly caused severe emotional distress and
mental
suffering and anguish to Plaintiff and to his family.

(1.56)(a). Defendants repeatedly created, used, and incited and
enabled others to use, published and repeatedly sent through
international
commerce, speech that "is directed to inciting or producing imminent
lawless
action and is likely to induce or produce such action."
(1.57). The conduct by Defendants was intentionally or recklessly
directed at Plaintiff, and lacked any reasonable justification, and
was
especially calculated to cause, and did cause, extreme mental
distress, fear of
death and/or fear of bodily injury in Plaintiff.

(1.58). The conduct of Defendants caused Plaintiff fright, shock,
severe anxiety and emotional distress, and made Plaintiff constantly
apprehensive and fearful that Plaintiff would subsequently suffer
personal
injuries and harassment as a result of the conduct of Defendants. As a
result of
the aforesaid conduct of the Defendants, the Plaintiff and his family
have
sustained physical and emotional distress.
(1.59). Said acts by Defendants were performed with the intent to
torture Plaintiff, assassinate the character of Plaintiff and paint
Plaintiff in a
defaming and false light. The actions of the Defendants did cause
Plaintiff,
and would cause any other reasonable person, to suffer humiliation,
mental
anguish, and emotional and physical distress and did harass, disturb,
annoy
Plaintiff and place Plaintiff in fear of death and/or bodily injury.
As a
proximate result of Defendants� actions, Plaintiff suffered
humiliation, mental
anguish, character assassination, emotional and physical distress,
fear of death
and bodily injury and torture, resulting in severe and irreparable
injuries to
Plaintiff, all to Plaintiff�s and his family�s damage.

(1.60). Such acts by Defendants were performed with a wanton and
reckless disregard of the consequences to Plaintiff. As a result of
Defendants�
wrongful acts and the consequential injuries sustained by Plaintiff,
Plaintiff has
been irreparably damaged. Plaintiff suffered further injuries, the
extent of which
have not been determined, and Plaintiff will request leave of court to
amend this
complaint to specify such injuries when they have been ascertained.
(1.61). The said wrongful acts of Defendants were done maliciously,
recklessly and/or negligently and as part of an organized gang common
purpose conspiracy against Plaintiff. Said wrongful acts against
Plaintiff
occurred with Defendants privately communicating with each other to
plan and
fashion a strategy to harass and torture the Plaintiff. Said
orchestrations and
common purpose of wrongful acts against Plaintiff by Defendants were
implemented with the deliberate and contrived common purpose intent to
inflict
severe mental, physical and emotional distress and anxiety on
Plaintiff; for this
reason and other malevolent and wrongful acts repeatedly perpetrated
against
Plaintiff by Defendants, Plaintiff seeks punitive damages.

(1.62). The actions of the Defendants, jointly and individually,
constitute tortuous harassment of Plaintiff and/or tortuous
intentional infliction
of emotional and physical distress.
(1.63). The above constitutes assault and battery, harassment,
intentional and/or negligent infliction of emotional distress.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Malicious Interference with Business
Advantage or Contractual Relations)
(1.64). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth
(1.68). As a result of this wrongful interference Plaintiff has
suffered
special damages.

(1.69). These acts and activities of interference and inducement,
pursuant to Defendants� policy of suppressing criticism of their fraud
and false
accusations and false statements about casino cheating, rebuttals to
their lies and
defamation, threats and obloquy, and to prevent disclosure of their
activities, were
undertaken oppressively, maliciously, willfully, wantonly, recklessly
and in an
abusive manner so as to entitle Plaintiff to punitive or exemplary
damages.
(1.70). As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants� malicious
inducement to third parties to distrust, scorn and hate Plaintiff, and
to impugn
Plaintiff�s reputation, past actions and knowledge, by recklessly
initiating all
actionable acts mentioned herein including but not limited to the
publishing of
hundreds of false accounts of Plaintiff�s past experiences with the
casino industry,
the Plaintiff suffered damages which true and prudent reports would
have
permitted Plaintiff to procure.
(1.71.) The Defendants� acts as described above constitute intentional
interference with economic advantage and prospective contractual
relations.

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Invasion of Privacy, Misappropriation of
Name/Likeness, False Light, Intellectual fraud)
(1.72). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth
above and herein with the same force and effect as if set forth again
in full.
(1.73). Defendants, between approximately 1996 to the present day,
without Plaintiff�s consent, express or implied, violated Plaintiff�s
rights of
privacy, subjected him to torture, harassment and intimidation,
intruded into and
invaded his seclusion, solitude and private affairs by, including but
not limited to
the facts set forth herein and in all exhibits, the unauthorized entry
into Plaintiff�s
computers, the publication of some of Plaintiff�s personal medical
history, the
publication of thousands of defaming and False Light messages on
USENET and
the internet, the publication of thousands of Intellectual Fraud
statements and
misrepresentations on USENET, Internet and Web Sites of a threatening,
obnoxious, defaming, and harassing nature, all highly offensive to a
reasonable
person and to Plaintiff as well as the publication on USENET of the
Plaintiff�s
home address and the publication that Defendants were following
Plaintiff from
his residence in automobiles.
(1.73)(a). Defendants repeatedly created, used, and incited and
enabled
others to use, published and repeatedly send through international
commerce,
speech that "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless
action and is
likely to induce or produce such action."
(1.74). That because of the foregoing wrongful acts and activities of
said Defendants, the Plaintiff was made to suffer ridicule,
embarrassment,
vexation, humiliation, mental distress, loss of sleep, torture, fear
and trepidation of
the loss of life and of injury to his person and to his family, and
injury to a
property interest inherent and inextricably woven in plaintiff�s
personality.

(1.75). The aforesaid acts and activities of said Defendants
constituted
extreme, outrageous, atrocious and intolerable conduct, beyond the
common
standards of human decency, which intentionally or recklessly, or with
reasonable
foreseeability, caused severe emotional distress, mental anguish and
trepidation to
Plaintiff. The Defendants did further act with malice and a reckless
disregard as to
the falsity of their publicized matter and the resulting false light
about Plaintiff
such publications created.

(1.76). That said acts and activities by Defendants interfered with
Plaintiff�s right to personal health and well being and to be free
from emotional
distress and mental anguish, and caused Plaintiff and his family to be
put in fear of
the loss of their life and limbs, and the fear of the continuation of
said wrongful
acts and their extension to more violent means of intimidation and
harassment,
many from unidentified sources and, therefore, completely beyond the
power of
Plaintiff to cope with. Those said acts caused Plaintiff expenses and
an
extraordinary amount of time of attempting to learn the source of said
acts, the
compilation of this complaint, the downloading and cataloging of
thousands of
items of evidence, and attempting to overcome the aspersions cast
thereby. That as
the result of all said acts and activities, Plaintiff has suffered
compensatory
damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
(1.77). The aforesaid acts also constitute harm to the plaintiff�s
interest in
privacy, a loss to be compensated in damages to be determined at
trial.
(1.78). Such acts and activities were oppressive, malicious,
outrageous,
willful, wanton, reckless and abusive, so as to entitle Plaintiff to
punitive or
exemplary damages in an amount to be determined at trial.

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION: CIVIL CONSPIRACY
(1.79). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth
above and herein with the same force and effect as if set forth again
in full.
(1.80). The Defendants entered into a confederation with a common
design and for the unlawful purposes as set forth in this complaint.
(1.80).(a). Defendants repeatedly created, used, enabled, and incited
others
to use, publish and repeatedly send through international commerce,
speech that
"is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is
likely to
induce or produce such action."
(1.81). Plaintiff suffered special damages as set forth in this
complaint,
and in an amount to be determined at trial.
(1.82). The gang conspirators have engaged in numerous overt acts in
furtherance of the conspiracy.
(1.83). Plaintiff has suffered consequential damage as a result of
those
overt acts.
(1.84). Thus, the Defendants, by a combination of two or more persons
acting in concert to commit unlawful acts, or to commit lawful acts by
unlawful
means, agreed to inflict wrong against or injury upon Plaintiff, and
the overt acts
and omissions set forth above and herein resulted in damage to
plaintiff.
(1.85). In committing these acts Defendants acted with malice toward
Plaintiff, and Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover from them
exemplary or
punitive damages.

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Prima Facie Tort)
(1.86). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set forth
again in
full.
(1.87). The acts and omissions of the Defendants as set forth herein
constitute a prima facie tort in that malevolence and intent to harm
Plaintiff
was the sole motivation for those Defendants� acts and/or omissions.
(1.87).(a). Defendants repeatedly created, used, incited and enabled
others
to use, publish and repeatedly send through international commerce,
speech that
"is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is
likely to
induce or produce such action."

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (STATE AND FEDERAL
RACKETEERING)
(1.88). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set forth
again in
full.
(1.89). On information and belief, Defendants also violated various
state RICO and racketeering statutes, and violated 18 U.S.C. 1961 et
seq., the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as
RICO.
(1.90). On information and belief, Defendants violated RICO
provisions of the state of Washington, including but not limited to
RCW
9A.82.060, RCW 115 Pa. 369, 9A.82.010(14), (15); 9A.82.100, for
engaging in a
pattern of criminal profiteering activity, with at least three acts
that have the same
or similar intent, results, accomplices, principals, victims or
methods of
commission, or be otherwise interrelated by distinguishing
characteristics
including a nexus to the same enterprise, and must not be isolated
events.
Remedies are sought under RCW 9A.82.100.

(1.91). Defendants did construct and display through international
commerce not less than eight (8) different international web sites
that contained
volumes of obloquy, defamation and false accusations about Plaintiff,
and without
authorization from Plaintiff said web sites also included some of
Plaintiff�s
registered and non-registered copyrighted materials. Said defamation,
false
accusations, malicious obloquy, copyright infringements, and other
overt and
actionable acts perpetrated against Plaintiff by Defendants were
initially
published on USENET for the purpose of attracting attention and
controversy, and
then once the Defendants created interest and established a
controversy about Plaintiff due to said threats, malicious defamation,
copyright
infringements, obloquy and other wrongful acts, the Defendants then
moved the
said controversy to web sites they owned and operated to (1) gain hits
on the web
sites, and, (2) use the said Web Site hits (accesses by potential
customers) to sell
products from companies Defendants� owned, operated or were acting as
an agent
therefore, and/or to sell advertising on said Web Sites to numerous
business
entities that would and did benefit from the fraudulent and false
obloquy
controversy maliciously created by Defendants about Plaintiff. Such
practices are
better known as �defamation or gang harassment for profit,� which
represents a
relatively new Internet based method of racketeering.

EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION - OBSCENE AND LEWD
COMMUNICATIONS VIOLATION OF 47 U.S.C. � 223
(1.92). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set
forth
above and herein with the same force and effect as if set forth again
in full.
(1.93) On information and belief, Defendants violated 47 U.S.C. � 223
by repeatedly publishing and communicating on USENET to and
about Plaintiff, publications containing obscene, indecent, lewd,
lascivious, filthy or harassing communications through a
telecommunications device (telephone, computer and/or modem) with
the sole and deliberate or reckless intention to annoy, cause
emotional
harm, abuse, threaten and or harass Plaintiff.

NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION - THREATS TO INJURE OR
KILL PLAINTIFF TRANSMITTED THROUGH INTERSTATE
COMMERCE IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. � 875, C ),
18 U.S.C. � 875,�- �Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign
commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any
person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.�
(1.94). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if
set forth again in full.
(1.95). On information and belief, Defendants violated 18
U.S.C. � 875, C by repeatedly publishing and delivering through
international commerce, and delivering via modem, threats of injury
and death to Plaintiff as partially outlined and evidenced in Exhibit
�C� attached to this complaint.

TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - TRANSMISSION AND
POSSESSION OF UNAUTHORIZED DOCUMENTS IN
VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. � 1028-A(2),(4),(6),(7),(8)
(1.96). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if
set forth again in full.
(1.97). On information and belief, Defendants violated 18
U.S.C. � 1028-A(2),(4),(6),(7),(8) through interstate
communications and commerce, repeatedly used conspiracy, fraud, the
unauthorized hacking entries into Plaintiff�s computers to secure and
remove all contents contained in the hard drives of those computers,
including but not limited to Plaintiff�s and his family�s social
security
numbers, birth dates, medical information, personal correspondence,
business correspondence, bank account numbers, credit card numbers,
trade secrets and other personal and proprietary information
belonging to Plaintiff and his family. The Defendants further violated
said statutes by the forging of US Government documents with the
forged signature of Plaintiff, by sending messages to third parties
and
posting USENET messages under the forged internet and real name of
the Plaintiff, and forging and then repeatedly and maliciously
publishing forged and/or fraudulent defaming FBI documents about
Plaintiff on USENET.

ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.
� 1343 - FRAUD BY WIRE, RADIO OR TELEVISION.
(1.98). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.99). On information and belief, Defendants violated 18
U.S.C. � 1343 through interstate communication by repeatedly,
deliberately and/or negligently publishing and sending forged and/or
fraudulent defaming and false United States FBI documents about
Plaintiff thereby defrauding the US Government and Plaintiff. The
Defendants further defrauded the US Government and Plaintiff by
forging Plaintiff�s name to US Government documents to obtain
personal military background information about Plaintiff. The
Defendants defrauded law enforcement, Plaintiff, and several religious
and government agencies by sending them false, altered, distorted
and/or forged statements and claims that Defendants maliciously and
falsely attributed to Plaintiff. The Defendants defrauded Plaintiff
and
various third parties by sending email messages and posting USENET
messages under the forged internet and real name of the Plaintiff.

TWELFTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF 17 U.S.C.
� 506 COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS OF PLAINTIFF�S
COPYRIGHTED AND REGISTERED WORKS
(1.100). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if
set forth again in full.
(1.101). In violation of 17 U.S.C. � 506 on information and
belief, the Defendants through interstate communications and
commerce repeatedly violated Plaintiff�s copyrights by reproducing
Plaintiff�s copyrighted articles on USENET in flagrant violation of
Plaintiff�s demand to cease such acts, and by reproducing Plaintiff�s
registered and non-registered copyrighted materials on Defendants�
web sites which are designed to achieve income for Defendants via
sales of product and advertising space.
(1.101)(a). Defendants arrogantly continued to infringe
on Plaintiff�s copyrights to defame Plaintiff and for income and
profit
in spite of numerous Plaintiff demands that Defendants cease and
desist infringing on his copyrights. The Defendants often taunted
Plaintiff about their numerous copyright violations, and often dared
Plaintiff to take legal action to stop them from infringing on
Plaintiff�s
copyrights.
(1.101) (b). The Defendants further violated Plaintiff�s
copyrights by reproducing Plaintiff�s copyrighted materials on
USENET, web sites and in email for the deliberate and exclusive
purpose of altering or deliberately misstating, or misinterpreting
Plaintiff�s articles so the altered or forged result of Defendants�
actions
could then be falsely attributed to Plaintiff, and said forgeries,
alterations or deliberate misrepresentations were used by Defendants
to
defame, harass, stalk, torture and libel Plaintiff, all representing
actionable overt acts against Plaintiff and clearly not representing
�fair
use� under the provisions of Title 17.
(1.101)�. Defendants� further violated Plaintiff�s copyrights by
deliberately, recklessly and/or negligently, and repeatedly, removing
copyright notices from Plaintiff�s copyrighted articles while
reproducing them on USENET, email and on Web Sites owned by
Defendants.
(1.101)(d). Defendants further publicly announced on
USENET that it was impossible and not legal for Plaintiff to copyright
any of his articles posted on USENET, and thereby Defendants�
deliberately incited, invited, enticed and enabled others to similarly
infringe on Plaintiff�s copyrights.

THIRTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF 18
U.S.C. � 1832 THEFT OF TRADE SECRETS
(1.102). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.103). I n violation of 18 U.S.C. � 1832 on information
and belief, the Defendants through interstate communications and
commerce repeatedly conspired to illegally remove information from
Plaintiff�s computers, and the Defendants did, with the use of hacking
and unauthorized entry into Plaintiff�s computer, removed trade
secrets
in respect to articles, systems, key formulas, book drafts and
extremely
secret methods researched, owned, created and mostly copyrighted by
Plaintiff. Defendants openly boasted about hacking into Plaintiff�s
computers on USENET.

FOURTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.
� 241 ; RESTRICTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
THROUGH THREATS AND INTIMIDATION.
�Title 18 Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to
agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any
state,
territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or
privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the
Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
Unlike
most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the
conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a
crime. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a
life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of
the
crime, and the resulting injury, if any. �
(1.104). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.105). On information and belief the Defendants did violate
18 U.S.C. � 241: Defendants, representing two or more individuals,
through interstate communications and commerce repeatedly
conspired to and did injure, oppress, torture, threaten and/or
intimidate
Plaintiff to stop exercising his free rights and enjoyment afforded to
him under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
by using fraud, false accusations, obloquy, threats of violence,
threats
of death and injury, defamation, stalking, harassment and other
actionable offenses designed and proclaimed often by Defendants to
stop Plaintiff from publishing his opinions (in respect to political
and
contemporary issues) and to stop him from exercising his right to
publish rebuttals to false accusations and other gang attacks.

(1.105)(a). Defendants specifically stated publicly on
USENET that Plaintiff had to be forced to �pay� for publishing his
opinion or articles or background information about his experiences.
(1.105)(b). Defendants specifically and publicly
announced that if Plaintiff would stop posting his opinions on
alt.politics, (a political newsgroup located on USENET) the
Defendants� would then stop harassing and stalking Plaintiff.
(1.105 -c Defendants also demanded, intimated, stated
and/or implied repeatedly that Plaintiff must stop posting his
opinions
and rebuttals on USENET newsgroups the Defendants wished to
control and dominate or face further gang harassment, obloquy and
stalking.

FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF TVPA
SECTION 3 (B) (1) TORTURING PLAINTIFF DUE TO A
PERCEIVED ACT BY PLAINTIFF
(1.106). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.107). Defendants violated TVPA Section 3 (b) (1) which
states: "Any act ... by which severe pain or suffering, whether
physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such
purposes as obtaining information or a confession, punishing them
for an act or suspicion of an act, intimidating or coercing them, or
for any reason based on discrimination of any kind." TVPA Section
3(b)(1).�
(1.108). Defendants deliberately violated TVPA Section 3 (b)
(1) in the respect that Defendants did deliberately psychologically
torture and inflict pain on Plaintiff with the use of gang harassment,
obloquy, stalking, libel, false accusations, threats of death,
violence
and personal injury and defamation. Defendants further published
forgeries, alterations and distortions of alleged past publications by
Plaintiff, and the fantastical and false light conclusions and
misrepresentations such forgeries and distortions produced and incited
were used as a joint enterprise and common purpose by Defendants to
further psychologically torture Plaintiff.
(1.108)(a). Said torture and psychological pain was
further inflicted on Plaintiff by Defendants based upon all actionable
acts stated herein.
(1.108)(b). Defendants published through international
commerce and on USENET that �Plaintiff had to pay� for his past
statements they claimed he published about his military service which
the Defendants falsely claimed contained fantastical asseverations of
fact. The Defendants openly admitted and published through
international commerce they were deliberately making Plaintiff �pay�
for his past statements ( punishing Plaintiff for an act or suspicion
of
an act is a clear violation of TVPA Section 3(b)(1).�).
(1.108)-c Such common purpose and malicious acts against
Plaintiff, implemented almost daily for a period of not less than
twenty two
months, clearly represents deliberate infliction of psychological
torture and pain on Plaintiff due to the act of Plaintiff publishing
USENET posts.

SIXTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF RCW
10.14.020 (UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT)
(1.109). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as
set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth
again in full.
(1.110). In violation of RCW 10.14.020 (Unlawful Harassment)
in that Defendants perpetrated a will ful course of conduct directed
at
Plaintiff which seriously alarmed, annoyed, harassed, and caused
extreme emotional distress, mental anguish and trepidation in
Plaintiff,
and,
A. Such course of conduct served no legitimate nor lawful
purpose other than to harass and thereby harm Plaintiff, and
B. Such course of conduct would cause a reasonable
person to suffer substantial emotional distress, mental anguish, and
did
cause substantial emotional distress and mental anguish to Plaintiff,
and
C. The course of conduct described herein was
continuous, and was repeated over a long period of time which clearly
demonstrated Defendants� continuity of purpose and common purpose
to cause and generate extreme emotional distress, mental anguish
trepidation of bodily injury and death in Plaintiff and Plaintiff�s
family.

SEVENTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF RCW
9.62.010 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
RCW 9.62.010 States: �Every person who shall, maliciously and
without probable cause therefore, cause or attempt to cause another to
be arrested or proceeded against for any crime of which he or she is
innocent:�
(1.111). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.112). In violation of RCW 19.62.010 (Malicious
Prosecution) in that Defendants conspired and carried out a willful
course of conduct directed at Plaintiff which resulted in the
Defendant
gang members crossing state lines to maliciously file a false and
frivolous criminal complaint against Plaintiff for unlawful
harassment.
Said malicious prosecution was deliberately designed by Defendants
to further harass, stalk, intimidate and cause extreme emotional
distress
in Plaintiff.

(1.113). After Defendants filed said malicious prosecution,
Defendants did then repeatedly boast about and announce said
prosecution on USENET so as to obviously and deliberately intensify
and increase the defamation and infliction of emotional distress,
mental
anguish and torture on Plaintiff.
(1.113)a. The same particular Defendant that crossed state lines
to further the gang�s harassment and intimidation of Plaintiff by
filing
malicious prosecution against Plaintiff for unlawful harassment, did
then, subsequent to such malicious criminal charges, incredibly and
arrogantly publish several additional publications on USENET
demanding that Plaintiff respond to his newly initiated defaming
publications directed to and about Plaintiff, and further continued to
publish and repeat the Defendants� previously published defamation,
fraud, harassment and obloquy directed to and about Plaintiff the same
as Defendants had published prior to filing said false criminal
complaints against Plaintiff.
(1.113)(b). The Defendants� obviously and clearly used their
malicious prosecution against Plaintiff as a means to intimidate and
psychologically torture Plaintiff, and deter or stop further Plaintiff
rebuttals to Defendants� defamation and false accusations, which
Defendants preposterously claimed represented further �unlawful
harassment� perpetrated by Plaintiff.

(1.113) - c). Defendants further claimed that Plaintiff�s cease and
desist demands published by Plaintiff and his lawyer and directed to
Defendants also represented a violation of Washington State Unlawful
Harassment Statutes.

(1.113) (d). Defendants further claimed that Plaintiff was
�harassing� Defendants if Plaintiff responded to any of the gang�s
defamation with a question, rebuttal or opinion.
(1.113) (e). Defendants further claimed that Plaintiff was
�harassing� Defendants if Plaintiff would rightfully and legitimately
replace his copyrighted articles that were being completely removed
from USENET by Defendants, and thereby deliberately hidden from
public view and then replaced with Defendant�s volumes of repeated
defamation, harassment and false accusations about Plaintiff.
(1.113) (f). Defendants further claimed that any question
Plaintiff asked in respect to why Defendants were perpetrating their
defamation campaign against Plaintiff represented yet another
violation
of said Washington State harassment statutes.
(1.113). (g). Defendants further preposterously claimed that
when Plaintiff responded to a Defendants� defaming post on USENET
and allowed the subject title which the Defendant himself had created
or allowed to remain intact, that act also represented a violation of
the
said Washington State Unlawful Harassment Statutes.
(1.113)(h). Defendants further proclaimed and published through
international commerce that filing complaints with Defendants ISP�s to
notify those ISP�s of Defendant harassment and violation of the terms
of service provided by said ISP�s (Internet Service Providers) was in
fact a criminal act, and Plaintiff further violated the provisions of
the
Washington State Unlawful Harassment Statutes due to his notices to
Defendants ISP�s in respect to Defendants harassment and stalking of
Plaintiff. Defendant�s clearly are using their filing of a false
criminal
complaint against Plaintiff to not only intimidate Plaintiff from
implementing the actions set forth above, but also to stop Plaintiff
from
notifying Defendant�s ISP�s as to the outrageous conduct and multiple
violations of said ISP�s terms of service by Defendants.
(1.113)(I). As Exhibit �A� attached to this complaint clearly
proves, filing false criminal charges against a target victim, or
other
malicious prosecution, is a common gang stalking tactic.
(1.113.(j). On information and belief, the evidence will show
that Defendants conspired together and did implement their contrived
malicious prosecution against Plaintiff to intimidate and threaten
Plaintiff to (1) stop exercising his First Amendment Constitutional
Rights, (2) to stop Plaintiff from notifying Defendants� ISP�s
(Internet
Service Providers) of the threats, harassment and defamation the
Defendants were repeatedly publishing about Plaintiff. Moreover,
such malicious prosecution by Defendants was clearly, deliberately and
with obvious maliciousness used to (1) further and intensify the
ongoing defamation, libel and harassment of Plaintiff (2) cause
Plaintiff additional extreme emotional distress and mental anguish,
(3)
intimidate Plaintiff to stop defending himself with rebuttals to
Defendants lies and obloquy, (4) to stop Plaintiff from complaining to
Defendants �s ISP�s and Web Hosts about the defamation, harassment,
libel, and fraud the Defendants were repeatedly posting and placing on
Web Sites, (5) to intimidate Plaintiff to not take legal action
against
Defendants , and (6) to intimidate Plaintiff from publishing his
opinions on politics and other contemporary issues on USENET. See
Exhibits___________

EIGHTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF RCWS
TITLE 9A CHAPTER 9A.28 SECTION 9A.28.040 CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACY
(1.114). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.115). In Violation of RCW 9A.28.040 (Criminal
Conspiracy) in that Defendants conspired together, and operated and
functioned as a gang with a common purpose and as a joint enterprise
to develop tactics and strategies for the malicious, reckless and
deliberate purpose of libeling, defaming, harassing, torturing,
threatening with violence and death, maliciously prosecuting,
intimidating and stalking Plaintiff.

NINETEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF RCWS
TITLE 9, CHAPTER 9.73> SECTION 9.73.060 VIOLATING
RIGHT OF PRIVACY.
(1.116). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.117). In violation of RCW 9.73.060 (Violating right of
Privacy) in that Defendants hacked into Plaintiff�s computer without
authorization and deliberately extracted extremely personal,
proprietary
and private information from said computers, such as Plaintiff�s
social
security number, and other extremely private and valuable information
including trade secrets. After removing said information from
Plaintiff�s computers, Defendants then used said private information
for
the purpose of further defaming, harassing and stalking Plaintiff.
Defendants further published private medical information about
Plaintiff on USENET, published Plaintiff�s home address with a threat
that Defendants were following Plaintiff in cars when he left his
home,
published misleading contents of Plaintiff�s military records and
regularly and repeatedly presented Plaintiff in a false light.
(1.117) (a.). Defendants� further used the private information
they removed from Plaintiff�s computers to send forged emails with
Plaintiff�s name to third parties for the purpose of further harassing
Plaintiff, and revealing his and his family�s personal information to
those that prey on and use such information for nefarious purposes.
(1.117(b). The Defendants acted with malice and reckless
disregard as to the falsity of their publicized matter about
Plaintiff, and
the resulting false light such publications produced in respect to
Plaintiff.

TWENTIETH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF RCW
RCW 9A.46.110. (STALKING)
(1.118). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as
set forth herein and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.119). In violation of RCW 9A.45.110 (Stalking) in that
Defendants intentionally and repeatedly harassed and threatened
Plaintiff with violence, physical injury, beatings and death, and
Plaintiff
was thereby placed in extreme fear that Defendants intended to injure
Plaintiff, and his family and property thereby forcing Plaintiff to
fear
for his life, and causing Plaintiff and any other reasonable person
extreme trepidation and emotional distress.
(1.119)(a). Defendants reproduced copyrighted and published
articles of Plaintiff�s opposing Radical Islamic terrorism, and did
then
hand carry and otherwise deliver those said articles to several Muslim
Mosques so as to incite further hatred and violence against Plaintiff.
(See Exhibit �C� attached to this complaint for examples of some of
the
said threats of violence and death Defendants directed to Plaintiff).
.

TWENTY-FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF
RCWS TITLE 9 CHAPTER 9.35 SECTION 9.35.005 (IDENTITY
THEFT).
(1.120). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation+
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.

(1.121). In violation of RCW 9.35.005 (Identity Theft) in that
Defendants conspired together and publicly announced and boasted on
USENET they had, without authorization, hacked into Plaintiff�s
computers and removed Plaintiff�s personal and business information
from said computers. The personal, private and proprietary information
available on Plaintiff computers contained Plaintiff�s and his
family�s
Social Security numbers, birth dates, volumes of general personal
correspondence including financial account numbers, bank records
from Federal Savings Banks, trade secrets, key formulas for
Plaintiff�s
trade and business, credit card records and numbers, and other
extremely personal and valuable information pertaining to Plaintiff�s
and his family�s identity, trade and business.
See Exhibit ________Pepperoni post.

TWENTY-SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF
RCW 9.61 (CYBERSTALKING) WITH AMENDMENTS TO
RCW 9A.46.060 AND 9A.46.100; REENACTING AND
AMENDING RCW 9.94A.515 AND 9.94A.515; ADDING A NEW
SECTION TO CHAPTER 9.61 RCW;
(1.122). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.123). In violation of RCW 9.61 (Cyberstalking) with
amendments to RCW 9A.46.060 and 9A.46.100; reenacting and
amending RCW 9.94A.515 and 9.94A.515; adding a new section to
chapter 9.61 RCW; in that Defendants with an obvious intent and
purpose to harass, intimidate, torment, torture, threaten, intimidate
and
embarrass plaintiff, did use electronic internet based communications
addressed and directed to Plaintiff and to third parties that
contained
lewd, lascivious, indecent and obscene words and language, and that
threatened to inflict injury and death on Plaintiff.

TWENTY-THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF
RCW 9A.46.020 (HARASSMENT)
(1.124). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.125). In violation of RCW 9A.46.020 (Harassment) in that
defendants did knowingly threaten to cause bodily injury to Plaintiff,
and did perpetrate hundreds of deliberate acts that were intended to
substantially harm Plaintiff in respect to Plaintiff�s physical or
mental
health and safety, and
(a) convinced Plaintiff that such threats and harassment would be or
were carried out.
(B). Defendants acted with malice and reckless disregard as to the
falsity of their publicized matter and resulting false light it
produced
about Plaintiff.

TWENTY-FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION RCW
9.58.010 (LIBEL AND MALICIOUS LIBEL)
(1.126). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.
(1.127) In violation of RCW 9.58.010 (Libel) and RCW
9.58.020 (Malicious Libel) in that Defendants while functioning with a
common purpose or as a joint enterprise, did knowingly, deliberately
and with malice construct and repeatedly publish through international
commerce, USENET articles, web sites, home pages, emails, and other
publications which Defendants knew contained blatantly false,
defaming, fraudulent, deceptive and misleading statements of facts
about Plaintiff, and then did conspire and deliberately or negligently
transmit those said libelous publications in international commerce to
expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and obloquy, and did
further deliberately publish hundreds of such publications designed to
deprive Plaintiff and his literary works of public confidence and
social
intercourse, and to implement a contrived character assassination
against Plaintiff.
(1.127)(a). Defendants deliberately and with malice published
documents containing libelous statements of fact about Plaintiff and
transmitted them in international commerce for the additional purpose
to harm and injure Plaintiff in his business and/or profession and job
opportunities.
(1.127)(b). In violation of RCW 9.58.020 (malicious libel) in
that Defendants did not publish the said defamation and libel
specified
herein honestly nor in good faith, nor was the content true, fair or
reasonable, and the Defendants were previously and frequently told by
Plaintiff that such statements were false, and the only demonstrated
motive for the Defendants to continue to repeatedly publish said
defamation and libel after Plaintiff informed Defendants their
accusations were false was to harm Plaintiff, and assassinate the
character of Plaintiff, and paint Plaintiff in a false and defaming
light.

TWENTY-FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF RCW
9.58.080 (FURNISHING LIBELOUS INFORMATION)
(1.128). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if
set forth again in full.
(1.129). In violation of RCW 9.58.080 (Furnishing libelous
information) in that Defendants did willfully create, provide, deliver
and transmit through international commerce libel and malicious libel
about Plaintiff to the publisher and owners of web sites, home pages,
newsletter authors, newsgroup moderators, and for publication on
USENET�s alt.news-media newsgroup.

TWENTY-SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION - VIOLATION OF RCW
9.52.100 (COMPUTER TRESPASS).
(1.130). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation
as set forth above and herein with the same force and effect as if set
forth again in full.

(1.131). In violation of RCW 9.52.110 (Computer trespass) on
information and belief that Defendants did conspire in concert and did
unlawfully enter Plaintiff�s computer and did trespass on Plaintiff�s
property for the purpose to steal personal and proprietary information
belonging to Plaintiff, and to steal and remove without authorization
or
knowledge of Plaintiff, other personal and private information,
business systems and programs, and trade secrets from Plaintiff�s
computers.
(1.132). Because many of the attacks, threats, obloquy, false
accusations, character assassinations, defaming publications and
messages and other actionable overt acts against Plaintiff were
published or acted upon anonymously, the true location of all
Defendants gang conspirators and gang predators is presently unknown,
although the location of the Plaintiff and the status at least of his
local
harm is known (though the wider harm will depend on how widely the
false defaming information was disseminated). Thus, many state
statutes other than those cited herein may have been violated as well.
Plaintiff will seek leave to amend as this information is uncovered.

STATUTORY GROUNDS FOR FEDERAL AND STATE
COMMON-LAWS
CIVIL ACTION
(1.133). CIVIL ACTION for threats of violence, injury and
death, harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
mental
anguish, libel, malicious libel, cyberstalking, stalking, defamation,
torture, identity theft, computer crimes, conspiracy to restrict
Plaintiff�s
constitutional rights, fraud, copyright violations and infringements,
racketeering, theft of intellectual property, malicious interference
with
Plaintiff�s business, trade and occupation, trespassing, assault,
terrorist
threats, malicious prosecution, the theft of proprietary information
and
trade secrets and for all other causes of action specified below:
(1.134). Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as
set forth herein with the same force and effect as if set forth again
in
full, and Plaintiff does hereby demand a Civil action against
Defendants
under all existing Common Laws and Torts that can be applied to all
violations, infringements, and actionable acts alleged herein.
(1.135). The conduct of defendant gang members
psychologically tortured Plaintiff, and caused Plaintiff and his
family fright, shock, severe anxiety and emotional distress, mental
anguish, loss of reputation, loss of income, trade and profession,
loss of
trade secrets, loss of personal and private information, loss of
identity,
and forced Plaintiff and his family to be constantly apprehensive and
fearful that Plaintiff and/or his property would subsequently suffer
personal injuries, death and continued harassment as a result of the
conduct of Defendants.
(1.135)(a). As a result of the conduct of the Defendants, the
Plaintiff has further sustained extreme physical and emotional
distress,
the loss of public faith and goodwill in respect to Plaintiff�s
business,
trade, occupation and reputation, and forced Plaintiff to suffer
torture,
hatred, contempt and ridicule which caused him to be shunned and
avoided, and which has further injured Plaintiff in his trade and/or
occupation.
(1.136). Defendants intended to inflict emotional distress on
Plaintiff and his family, or knew or should have known that emotional
distress was the likely result of their conduct. Defendants� conduct
in
respect to Plaintiff was extreme and outrageous, beyond all possible
bounds of legitimacy and decency, and utterly intolerable in a
civilized
community.
(1.137). It was due directly and exclusively to the actions of the
Defendants that caused Plaintiff the harm and damage expressed
herein, including but not limited to Plaintiff�s emotional distress,
mental anguish, scorn, humiliation, defamation, libel, trepidation and
loss of income, job opportunity, trade and business opportunities.
(1.138). The harm and emotional distress suffered by Plaintiff
due to the actions of the Defendants was and is severe, directly
resulted
in and caused severe emotional and physical harm, and such distress
and other harm is of such a nature that no reasonable person could be
expected to endure it.
(1.139) The Plaintiff repeatedly offered all Defendants the
opportunity to contact Plaintiff directly by email or telephone
(Plaintiff even listed his cell telephone number on the Defendants
newsgroup for months) for clarification, context, meaning, and/or
substantiation of any text, writing or publication allegedly written,
conceived or published by Plaintiff.

(1.139) (a). The Defendants were duty bound to first determine
whether Plaintiff actually wrote the passages Defendants were using to
defame and otherwise attack Plaintiff, and/or to first determine the
correct meanings and context of those passages prior to publishing the
most defaming misinterpretation the Defendants could conjure in
respect to those passages or text the Defendants alleged were written
and conceived by Plaintiff.
(1.139) (b). By deliberately ignoring Plaintiff�s repeated offers
to confirm, clarify, and determine true context and meaning of all
alleged text Defendants� attributed to Plaintiff prior to Defendants�
publishing said defamation and false accusations in respect to such
text
and passages, Defendants displayed outrageous and extreme
negligence, recklessness and a common purpose and clear intent to
harm Plaintiff.

(1.140). The wrongful acts by the Defendants stated herein
were performed with the intent and common purpose to also force
Plaintiff to stop exercising his rights of free speech on the internet
and
USENET, and to punish and torture Plaintiff for alleged misstatements
about his military service, demean, damage, and cast in a false light
Plaintiff�s business, knowledge of trade, military service, veracity,
integrity, reputation, personal security, financial resources, income
and
reputation.

(1.141). Said actionable acts perpetrated by Defendants were
performed with a wanton, negligent and reckless disregard of the
consequences to Plaintiff, his family, his trade and occupation and
his
property.
(1.141)(a). As a result of Defendants� common purpose
negligent and/or deliberate wrongful and actionable acts against
Plaintiff, and the injuries sustained by Plaintiff and his family due
to
such acts, Plaintiff has been irreparably damaged. Plaintiff has
suffered further injuries at the hands of the defendant gang members,
which are ongoing, the extent of which have not yet been determined,
and Plaintiff will request leave of court to amend this complaint to
specify such injuries when they have been ascertained.
(1.142). The actionable acts listed herein directed against
Plaintiff perpetrated by Defendants were done maliciously and as
part of an organized predatory gang conspiracy, orchestration,
cooperation, common purpose, enablement and joint enterprise against
Plaintiff. Said acts were perpetrated with the deliberate, reckless
and/or negligent intent to inflict severe mental and emotional
distress,
torture, fear of death and injury, and anxiety on Plaintiff and his
family members.
(1,142) (a). Many such wrongful acts were directed against
Plaintiff well after Plaintiff (and his lawyer) published and
delivered
dozens of �cease and desist� demands to Defendants, and further
informed Defendants their actions were torturing Plaintiff and causing
extreme emotional distress, mental anguish, and trepidation in both
Plaintiff and Plaintiff�s family members. Yet such wanton wrongful
acts and attacks by Defendants recklessly and negligently continued
against Plaintiff long after Plaintiff informed the Defendants dozens
of
times their defaming interpretations, characterizations and
conceptualizations of what the Defendants� alleged Plaintiff had
written
or dictated in the past were both blatantly incorrect and false.

(1.142) (b). For any one of the afore stated reasons, Plaintiff
seeks punitive damages and the reimbursement of all reasonable legal
fees and expenses.
(1.143). The actions of the Defendants, jointly and
individually, constitute tortuous harassment of Plaintiff and/or
tortuous intentional infliction of emotional distress and mental
anguish.

(1.144). The actions of the Defendants, jointly and
individually, constitutes tortuous assault and battery, harassment,
stalking, libel, and the intentional/negligent infliction of torture
and
extreme emotional distress on Plaintiff and his family.
(1.145). The actions of the Defendants, jointly and individually,
have created a tortuous loss of trade, financial resources,
reputation,
trade secrets, property and profession for Plaintiff.
(1.146). The actions and the threats of the Defendants, jointly
and individually, have tortuously forced Plaintiff to fear for his
life, his
family�s life, and to suffer extreme trepidation of bodily injury and
death at the hands of Defendants or from others incited to violence by
the actions, enablements, incitements, contributions and publications
of Defendants.

(1.147. The Defendants have deliberately created a threat of
death and violence scenario against Plaintiff in which violence
against
Plaintiff or against his family could occur at any time in the future
by
those Defendants have enticed and incited to attack Plaintiff. Such
perpetrators of said violence against Plaintiff could even be
individuals
unknown by Defendants, such as members of Muslim Mosques that
Defendants contacted about Plaintiff, or other similar third parties
that
Defendants deliberately contacted for the purpose of casting Plaintiff
in
a false light or to demonize Plaintiff.

(1.147) (a). As a consequence of Defendants� actions in this
regard, the threat of violence and death in respect to Plaintiff and
his
family will exist in perpetuity, and the fear and trepidation
presently
existing in Plaintiff and Plaintiff�s family that has been
deliberately
generated by Defendants� actions will therefore also exist in
perpetuity.
(1.148). The actions and the threats of the Defendants, jointly
and individually, have psychologically tortured Plaintiff, will
continue
to torture Plaintiff in the future, and many such acts perpetrated by
the
Defendants against Plaintiff represent terrorist threats against
Plaintiff.
(1.149). In each count or cause of action listed in this section,
Plaintiff repeats and alleges each and every allegation as set forth
herein with the same force and effect as if set forth again in full.

(1.150). On information and belief, Defendants engaged in,
enabled, while operating with a common purpose and as a joint
enterprise, producing or repeating publications delivered through
international commerce directed or addressed to Plaintiff, or directed
or addressed to third parties about Plaintiff, in violation of various
federal and state laws. These laws either directly permit civil
redress or
indirectly support common law claims from injuries suffered as a
result
of these violations of federal and state law.
(1.151). Defendants repeatedly deliberately and arrogantly
infringed upon and violated Plaintiff�s copyrights to (1) defame,
harass, stalk and discredit Plaintiff personally and individually, and
not
to simply criticize or review his copyrighted materials under the
�Fair
Use� provisions of Title 17, and (2) to misuse Plaintiff�s copyrighted
materials to gain income and profit by republishing Plaintiff�s
articles
on Defendant�s Web Sites.
(1.151) (a). Defendants further infringed and violated Plaintiff�s
copyrights by removing the copyright notices from his articles, and by
enticing and inciting others to also violate his copyrights by
repeatedly
proclaiming that it is impossible to copyright information posted on
USENET.
(1.151) (b). Defendants regularly and repeatedly violated
Plaintiff�s copyrights regardless of repeated notices to Defendants by
Plaintiff to cease and desist such infringements and violations.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court grant the
following relief:
1. Enter an Order restraining Defendants, their agents and all those
enabling or participating with Defendants or their agents from further
harassment, stalking, threats, defamation, defaming or harassing
references to Plaintiff by any means including nicknames or other
names that would convey Plaintiff�s identity to others, and further
restrain Defendants from publishing in any manner Plaintiff�s alleged
past comments or statements, including but not limited to Plaintiff�s
copyrighted materials, without the express permission of Plaintiff.

2. Enter a declaration and order that all ISP�s, (internet service
providers) Re-mailers, proxy servers, news servers, web hosts, that
enable Defendants and their agents to access the Internet, USENET or
Web Sites, to provide Plaintiff and law enforcement with the names,
addresses and telephone numbers of all individuals that own or use the
Defendants� on-line accounts, including the names of all aliases used
by
the Defendants or their agents in association with those accounts.

3. Enter an order for the Defendants and their agents and fellow gang
members to permanently remove all harassing, defaming, stalking,
threatening and offensive publications about Plaintiff from all known
archives. Plaintiff will furnish Defendants a list of said defaming
publications that must be permanently removed by Defendants.

4. Enter an order for Defendants to contact in writing all third
parties
they have previously contacted about Plaintiff, and advise such that
all
defaming statements and publications delivered to said third parties
by
Defendants about Plaintiff are being retracted via a court restraining
order. Copies of such notices must also be delivered to Plaintiff.

5. WHEREFORE, FOR ALL COUNTS OR CAUSES OF
ACTIONS LISTED HEREIN, due to each cause of action listed herein
possibly representing different damage conditions, amounts and
specifications, and since damage amounts may vary from count to
count and from statute to statute, the Plaintiff demands a separate
judgment against the Defendants for each of the individual causes of
action listed herein, a total of twenty-six causes of action, jointly,
severally and in the alternative for compensatory and consequential
damages in an amount to be determined at trial, interest, costs of
suit,
reasonable attorneys fees, punitive damages, special damages in an
amount to be determined at trial, injunctive remedies pursuant to the
provisions of relevant state and federal statutes, and any other
relief the
Court may deem just and proper.
6. To conduct a jury trial to determine the nature and extent of
damages to Plaintiff.
7. That this Court retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose
of
enforcing this Court�s order.
8. Plaintiff reserves the right to further amend this complaint as new
facts emerge regarding this matter, and as the names of Defendants are
uncovered, and to add additional claims in the interest of justice.

JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury.
DATED: March 15, 2007,
Ridgefield, Washington

CERTIFICATION
The claims and other legal contentions herein are warranted by
existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for the extension,
modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new
law.
Respectfully submitted,
Douglas G. Reiman
Plaintiff Pro Se
810 Raven Drive
Ridgefield, WA 98642
360-727-4523

Exhibit �A� �Gang Stalking References�
Douglas G. Reiman Civil Action Docket No.________________.
v.
John Does, et al.
The following information provides a detailed listing of web sites of
organizations and victim groups, including professional conclusions in
respect
to the impact such mobbing or gang stalking is having on our society
and law
enforcement in general. These web sites have been produced by victims
that
have been subjected to the same gang or mob stalking and harassment as
Plaintiff.
(3.0). DEFENDANTS OPERATED AND CONSPIRED AS A
PREDATORY GANG OF STALKERS AND SMEAR MERCHANTS AND
AS A JOINT ENTERPRISE AND WITH A COMMON PURPOSE - TO
HARM PLAINTIFF.
(3-1). The Defendants have conspired and operated together as a
�predatory gang of stalkers and defamers� (as defined below by R.B.
Ross and
other experts on gang stalking) determined to perpetrate, enable,
contribute to
and orchestrate the actionable acts against Plaintiff stated as a
cause of this
action herein and that are the subject of this complaint.

(3-2). Such predatory stalking and hate crime gangs have been
identified
by many victims and victim groups that have also been subjected to
similar
�hate crime gang or mobbing harassment and defamation� on USENET, the
internet and elsewhere. The following reference information defines
and
demonstrates to the court how the Defendant gang members (hereinafter
known as �Defendants�) collectively operated, perpetrated,
orchestrated,
enabled, contributed to and/or cooperatively conspired to effect a
common
purpose to harass, stalk, libel, annoy, threaten with violence and
death, and
defame Plaintiff, almost every single day for a period of at least
more than
twenty-three months - resulting in more than three thousand five
hundred
separate harassing publications and hate attacks against Plaintiff.
(3.3). REFERENCE - Predatory Gangstalking and Hate Crime
Gang Operations
(3.4). The following information represents independent and expert
descriptions of �Predatory Gangstalking� which reveal the tactics the
Defendant predatory cyberstalking gang used (and is still using) to
stalk, libel,
threaten, intimidate, defame and harass Plaintiff.
(3.5). "Predatory Gangstalking is a criminal phenomenon referring
to a group of loosely affiliated people who, in an organized and
systematic
manner, relentlessly invade all areas of an individual�s life on a
continuing
basis, as part of their lifestyle. While each individual gangstalker
does his
or her small part, what defines Predatory Gangstalking is the
collective
intent to do harm." R.B.Ross c 2005
(3.6). Anti Multiple Stalker (Citizen Harassment Group)
Information and Support Site
http://tinyurl.com/nej9h (On line URL to Site).
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/ (Actual Site URL).

(3.7). �Organized Stalking is a well-organized, occult form of covert
harassment used against an individual. It is done by large groups of
people
who systematically & repeatedly harass individuals.�
http://tinyurl.com/ev6kb
http://www.rich-essence.com/whatisit.htm

(3.8). �Community-based harassment is a grown-up version of
school yard bullying. Multiple individuals within a community
participate
in the harassment and stalking of a single individual. However, rather
than
attack a victim physically, techniques are used to undermine a person
psychologically. This can be far more damaging than a physical attack
because
not only is it very hard to prove, but it is extremely traumatizing
for the victim.
(Also known as cause stalking or predatory gang stalking).�
Federal laws potentially involved include but are not limited to:
47 U.S.C. �223 (anonymous obscene, indecent, lewd, lascivious, filthy,
or
harassing communications through a telecommunications device);
18 U.S.C. � 875-C) (interstate telephone calls via modem and email
threatening
injury);
18 U.S.C. � 1030(a)(5) (infected computers with a computer virus);
18 U.S.C. � 1363 (mail fraud);
.
(3.9). �Psychological harassment is not a new phenomenon but it is one
that is on the rise. It�s a serious phenomenon that has serious
consequences for
the victims and our society.
This website was created to provide information about psychological
harassment and its many forms. It also exposes psychological
harassment and
different psychological manipulations used to target individuals.
Many victims of psychological harassment suffer from physical
ailments,
irritability, anxiety, nervousness, insomnia, stress, fatigue,
depressive states,
burn outs, and in some cases suicide.

Violence has different forms: Physical and Psychological. Many safe
guards
have been put in place to prevent physical violence in our society but
few if any
exist to prevent psychological violence.
Psychological harassment has many forms: the most common being verbal
abuse. Some tactics aim at trying to humiliate or weaken the morale of
individuals or groups.
Mobbing also referred to by some as bullying, psychological terrorism,
and
organizational violence is described as a collective form of
psychological
violence in which many individuals unite to persecute an individual by
making constant negative remarks, repeated criticism or sarcasm,
intimidation, threats, insinuations, try to humiliate, circulate false
information concerning the individual, and to socially isolate the
individual. Mobbing is a way of destroying a person without using any
physical means, a psychological war of nerves with �wear the
individual
out tactics.� A group attacks an individual's dignity, integrity,
self-image,
self-confidence, self-esteem, place in doubt of competence, threaten
their
careers, and means of subsistence.
One method used to induce distress or suffering in a person is by
systematically isolating them from their peers.
After a few months some victims can suffer from psychiatric
difficulties
such as paranoia, chronic fatigue, loss of self-confidence, and
depression.
http://tinyurl.com/yccj4g
http://www.psychologicalharassment.com/

(3.10). Gang Stalking Home Page
gang (ga[ng]):
�A group of criminals or hoodlums who band together for mutual
protection, psychological acceptance and superiority, opportunity
and/or
profit stalk (st�k):
To follow, communicate with or defame (a person) persistently,
especially
out of obsession or derangement.
Also known as cause stalking, vengeance stalking, organized stalking
and
group stalking.
GANG STALKING OVERVIEW
�Gang stalking involves the use of multiple individuals to stalk,
harass
and taunt a victim, as well as to vandalize personal property. This
can
take place for many years, particularly since law enforcement and
legislation have yet to catch up with the reality of organized
stalking by
groups.
Techniques of psychological warfare are used against the target in a
methodical and well orchestrated attack that often leaves the target a
victim of ridicule among his friends and family because this
occurrence is
so hard to believe. However, the number of targets are
increasing to the point that they can network with one another and
find
out that the same tactics are used everywhere. These tactics are
intended
to weaken the target to the point of physical and psychological
collapse.
The reasons why a person is initially targeted can vary. Sometimes the
person may be a political activist. Others may have been in the wrong
place at the wrong time. Corporations apparently have even been known
to hire these stalking groups to silence people who were once in their
employ. These stalking gangs may be lied to about the target, thinking
that
perhaps the person is a deviant who needs to be driven out of town.
The
reasons are only limited to the imagination. In some cases, according
to
David Lawson, author of Terrorist Stalking in America, the person has
done nothing wrong but is simply used as a practice target or as an
example to others in the group to show what can happen to them if they
anger the group in some way. This serves to keep the members of these
stalking groups tied to the group through intense fear of becoming a
target. It is such a terrifying prospect because the gang members are
intimately aware that the lives of the targets are utterly destroyed.
(See
FAQ for more information).
Many people ask, "Why would anyone engage in this kind of activity?"
In order to answer that question, it's important to realize that the
person
who has decided to target an individual is not the person (or persons
in
this case) doing the stalking. This is known as "stalking by proxy".
Those
who have called "the hit" (so-to-speak) may be doing it for any number
of
reasons, including revenge, jealousy, or a desire to keep someone
silent. It
may be that physically harming a person is considered too extreme or
too
risky by the perpetrators. In fact, this kind of psychological attack
can be a
far more effective way to harm someone. It can completely destroy a
person's life while leaving little or no evidence to incriminate the
perpetrators.

Additionally, there are the reasons that the stalkers themselves
engage in
the activity, which have little or nothing to do with why the person
may
have been targeted in the first place. It is conceivable that the
participants
in the harassment don't even know why the person has been targeted,
nor
would most of these individuals have any personal stake in harassing
the
victim. But certain things are clear - this is an both an addictive
behavior
as well as a form of entertainment for the stalkers. From the
expressions
on the faces of some of the perpetrators who come face-to-face with
their
targets, there is a vicious kind of pleasure that they derive from
bullying
their victim. Clearly they like the feeling of being "in control".
Like our society's current obsession with "reality TV", this activity
must
inevitably gain popularity as the ultimate experience of "reality"
entertainment. Such is the nature of the bottomless pit within the
stalkers
that thirsts, evermore, for greater and greater thrills. To the
perpetrators,
their targets are merely their prey, in a game that never ends. But
make
no mistake, whatever the reasoning behind it, this is a vicious and
calculated hate crime. �

(3.11). DESCRIPTION OF (GANG STALKING) ACTIVITIES
(3.12). The types of activities which take place are often subtle, and
sometimes cannot be distinguished from normal everyday things that go
wrong, but they typically occur much more frequently than they would
normally. David Lawson points out in his book, Terrorist Stalking in
America,
that the victim is intentionally "sensitized" to the presence of the
stalkers, so
he or she will know that the occurrences are orchestrated. This causes
intense
psychological strain due to the isolation and ridicule that results
when the
target tries to share these experiences with others. It is a
psychological reign of
terror intended to make a victim look crazy and intended to keep him
or her in a
constant state of anxiety and stress as to "what will happen next"
(also known
as "hyper-vigilance").
See Terrorist Stalking in America for more information.
Useful Search Terms:
stalking-by-proxy
stalking
mobbing
bullying
"psychological harassment"
"psychological violence"
Last Modified on 06/02/2006 06:03:47
http://tinyurl.com/2vbv7u On Line Gang Stalking Web Site.
http://www.gangstalking.ca/ (Actual Site)

(3.13). Additional Information on Organized Gang Stalking
Descriptions and References:
(3.14). What is Gang Stalking?
�Gang stalking is a psychological attack that can completely destroy a
persons
life, while leaving little or no evidence to incriminate the
perpetrators.
It's similar to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the
community. It
called gang stalking, because groups of people organize to stalk
targets 24/7.�
http://tinyurl.com/2pcwqf Gang Stalking World information.
http://gangstalkingworld.com/
(3.15). Gang Stalking World
� GANG STALKING MOTIVES What are some gang stalking motives? -
REVENGE services for hire by anyone who REALLY wants to "get back at"
someone else �
http://tinyurl.com/32xa3u Gang Stalking Examples.
http://www.raven1.net/gsivwpublic.htm
(3.16). Gang Stalking Intent Examples:
�The intent of gang-stalking is to �
1. render the target, the victim, psychologically demoralized even to
the point of committing suicide;
2. make the target appear, to the larger community, to be mentally
unstable for the purposes of � a. discrediting and psychologically
demoralizing the target; b. ensuring no one will believe the target
when
they claim they are being targeted;
3. alienate and marginalize the target from the larger community, even
family, making it easier to psychologically demoralize and discredit
the
target.
The number of reported incidences of gang-stalking has increased
measurably since the early 1990s when the transformation of American
society to systems philosophy began in earnest.
Gang-stalking holds no political association with those targeted
covering the political spectrum of liberal, centrist, conservative,
ultraleft
and ultra-right. People involved in gang-stalking display a common
trait of needing to feel that they have power over the target even
though
they may not know that person.�
http://tinyurl.com/3b9mbo More Gang stalking Examples.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter78.htm

(3.17). http://tinyurl.com/hss54 (Gang Stalking Definitions).
�Community Based Harassment-Gang stalking.
End Exhibit �A� Gang Stalking References.

Douglas G. Reiman v. John Does et al Civil Action Docket
No.________________.
Douglas G. Reiman
v.
John Does, et al
Civil Action Docket No._____________
EXHIBIT �B� EXAMPLES OF ACTIONABLE
ACTS AGAINST PLAINTIFF BY DEFENDANTS
(6.1). On information and belief, it is alleged by Plaintiff:
(6.2). On or about March 2005, what appears to be the main leader,
enabler and inciter of the Defendant smear merchant gang maliciously
initiated
an exhausting search of Google archives in respect to all USENET
accounts
previously and presently used for the past ten years. This deliberate
�back
search� of USENET post archives in respect to Plaintiff�s past USENET
accounts was conducted by the smear merchant gang leader to find
articles or
comments, figures of speech, wisecracks, quips, embellishments,
musings,
typographical errors, misstatements, errors in grammar, ambiguities,
general
references to what Plaintiff helped accomplish or did as a member of a
unit
during his military service, and other similar published quips or
out-of-context
text contained in articles posted by Plaintiff, his associates, or
published by
other individuals unknown by Plaintiff that were also posting such
information
on USENET from the same account as Plaintiff.
(6.2)(a). The smear gang leader committed the time to complete this
extensive back search of past USENET postings under accounts Plaintiff
had
used in the past, and downloaded and otherwise recorded any and all
said quips
and such from the Plaintiff�s past accounts for the deliberate purpose
of using
such errors, quips, wisecracks, ambiguities etc... as a means to
defame, harass,
stalk, intimidate and threaten Plaintiff, and to incite, instill a
common purpose
into, and enable his confederates (gang) to join him in a joint
enterprise to
deliberately launch a smear campaign against Plaintiff.

(6.3). In total, there were approximately twenty-thousand past
publications that were posted from USENET accounts that Plaintiff had
used or
was using. Considering the volume of posts involved, and the fact that
several
different people were posting from the same accounts as Plaintiff, and
further
considering that several different typists were used to post under
these accounts,
on average there should exist at least hundreds of typographical
errors,
wisecracks, other errors, misstatements, and/or ambiguities contained
somewhere in those said twenty-thousand or so posts. Not to mention
thousands of sentences or text that could be taken out of context and
rewritten
or forged into a completely different and defaming meaning or context.
Rewriting, deliberately misinterpreting, forging by adding or taking
away key
words, taking meanings of sentences and paragraphs out of context,
then using
those newly created fraudulent �re-writes and forgeries� as a means to
defame
their victim represents one of the main smear tactics of an on-line
smear
merchant gang
(6.4). The new smear merchants were well aware that Plaintiff and his
associates had previously announced several times on USENET that (1)
they
used several different typists to post information they had dictated,
or the typists
operated on behalf of Plaintiff and his associates with an editorial
license, (2)
that several different individuals were accessing the same computers
and were
also posting on USENET from those computers and from the same
accounts,
and (3) that Plaintiff and his associates had filed a lawsuit in the
past
complaining that individuals unknown to Plaintiff and his associates
had hacked
into Plaintiff�s computer and had posted USENET posts, emails and
other
information from the Plaintiff�s account and had forged Plaintiff�s
and his
associates names to those said publications.
(6.5). Regardless of the Smear Merchant�s (hereinafter �Defendant�s�)
advance knowledge that all of the USENET publications the Defendants
had
discovered during their deliberate search of Plaintiff�s past USENET
accounts
did not belong to Plaintiff, and were not all written by him, and that
Plaintiff
did not know many such publications even existed, the Defendants
selected any
and all statements, wisecracks, figure of speeches, embellishments,
musings,
references, typographical errors, jokes, obviously fictional story
embellishments, misstatements, ambiguities, and any general errors,
including
obvious grammar errors and references to acts and deeds in the context
of unit
participation and not as a single person, contained in the text of all
USENET
posts published under the same accounts Plaintiff had used in the past
or was
presently using, and proceeded to deliberately and repeatedly publish
egregiously defaming misrepresentations of the text and information
contained
in said posts, and did further repeatedly publish in interstate
commerce,
deliberate out of context and false interpretations of said text in
the most
defaming manner the Defendants could imagine.

(6.6). To incite, instill a common purpose and operate as a joint
enterprise to defame, threaten, harass and stalk Plaintiff, and enable
others to
join their smear campaign against Plaintiff, the Defendants further
falsely
misrepresented and falsely claimed that all USENET posts published
under the
accounts Plaintiff used in the past were written and posted personally
by
Plaintiff, and Defendants further falsely claimed that all information
contained
in said USENET posts (including all typographical errors, wisecracks,
musings,
embellishments, ambiguities, outright fiction, grammar errors, figures
of speech
etc . . . ) exclusively represented absolute �asseverations of fact�
by Plaintiff
autarkically and exclusively outside of his unit or group.
(6.7). To further embellish, incite and enable others to join the
Defendants� smear campaign against Plaintiff, and to enable the gang
to
operate with a common purpose and as a joint enterprise to smear
Plaintiff, the
Defendants� also deliberately forged, altered, distorted and/or added
their own
words, or took away words, from said USENET text postings that were
posted
under accounts that Plaintiff had used. The Defendants forged and
altered past
statements of Plaintiff and others that used the same USENET account
as
Plaintiff for the deliberate purpose of fabricating completely
different contexts
and meanings of said articles and postings, and then the Defendants
repeatedly
used their own defaming and false misrepresentations, false
interpretations,
forgeries, alterations and distortions of what they falsely claimed
Plaintiff stated
as a fact in past postings, to launch and repeatedly publish an
incredible
defamation and obloquy campaign against Plaintiff that continues this
very day.

(6.8). A few classic examples of Defendant�s forgeries and deliberate
defaming misinterpretations of Plaintiff�s past USENET publications:
(6.8)(a). When Plaintiff was asked on USENET years ago how many
enemies he killed in Vietnam - Plaintiff replied with a simple answer
of: �As
many as I could.� Plaintiff�s answer was in context a reference to his
previously
stated belief that no veteran of any war really knew how many enemy he
might
have killed or was directly or indirectly responsible for killing
during that war.
One might be considered responsible for killing the enemy simply by
commanding men that did actually kill the enemy, or by assigning men
to a
position or duty that resulted in the killing of the enemy. Moreover,
if a soldier
was a member of a unit he too was responsible for the actions of that
unit,
whether it be calling in Artillery, or Air Strikes, or participation
in a battle that
resulted in the death of the enemy. Plaintiff has written often that
it is not just
the pilot of a bomber that is individually responsible for the death
and
destruction of his bombs, his complete crew, including the navigator,
co-pilot,
gunners, etc... and all those on the ground that contributed to and
helped the
bombing mission succeed in any way are equally responsible for the
actions
and results of the mission. The same can be said about a ground unit.
It is the
Plaintiff�s belief that all members of a unit contribute to the
mission of the unit,
and therefore bear equal responsibility and credit for the actions and
results of
that unit. It is in this context that Plaintiff posted many of his
statements about
his military service, and further, answered questions about his
service.
However, the simple and accurate retort of Plaintiff stated above was
distorted
by the Defendants into a false defaming false bravado claim by
Plaintiff.
Defendants distorted Plaintiff�s simple �as many as I could� answer
into:
� Doogie says he personally killed a large number of VC and NVA .�
�Or,
Doug said he killed thousands of VC with a knife, gun and garotte.�
(6.8)(b). Plaintiff went on to add to his answer of the above �how
many
did you kill� question by further providing a quick and loose estimate
of enemy
body count of what Plaintiff believed at the time ALL of his units
(teams) he
was assigned to in Vietnam during his entire Two&1/2 tours of duty
achieved:
(Vietnam was a body count war, and all Plaintiff could do at the time
was just
provide a general estimate of the enemy BC from a 40-year-old memory).
Plaintiff stated in reply that he *estimated* that his teams (all of
his units he
served within Vietnam for the entire time Plaintiff was in Vietnam)
achieved a
total estimated enemy body count of 1803 KIA. The Defendants then
immediately and preposterously distorted Plaintiff�s answer into more
defaming bravado claims of:
�Doug Grant (Reiman) said he personally killed 1803 enemies in
Vietnam� Or
�Doug (Reiman) Grant says he has 1803 confirmed kills in Vietnam.�

(6.8)�. The Defendants� then sent their false and absurd distortions
of
what Plaintiff said (even after Plaintiff publically corrected
Defendants several
times) to fellow Vietnam veterans and comrades of Plaintiff, and to
the VA,
and to scores of other third parties so as to further defame
Plaintiff, and cast
Plaintiff in a false light with his peers and others. Defendants�
announced and
repeatedly published such outrageous and defaming distortions of what
they
falsely claimed Plaintiff had written in the past on USENET and
elsewhere long
after Plaintiff informed Defendants scores of times their obviously
deliberate
defaming interpretations in respect to this issue and others were
preposterously
false and incorrect.

(6.8(d). As another example of the Defendant�s deliberate defamation
in
this respect, once a typist in Plaintiff�s group posted the following
figure of
speech and hyperbolic statement, in a joking manner; �I was trained
to take no prisoners and eat the wounded.�
(6.8)(e.). The above figure of speech was contained in a post as a
clear
�joking figure of speech� that had nothing to do with the Vietnam war.
Using
that clearly hyperbolic figure of speech the Defendants then published
the
following defamation and harassment contained in hundreds of USENET
publications about Plaintiff stating as a fact that:
�DGVReiman was a war criminal that feasted on the bodies of dead POWs.
�
The Defendants then repeatedly published hundreds of additional
defaming
publications seriously claiming that �Plaintiff was a cannibal, war
criminal,
feasted on prisoners, etc.�

(6.8)(f). Yet another classic example of the Defendants forgeries,
distortions and outrageous deliberate defamation published hundreds of
times
through international commerce against Plaintiff is based upon a
one-time
isolated USENET exchange with another person: After Plaintiff had
already
told that person he was conversing with on USENET that he was an NCO
in
Vietnam, in that same USENET exchange with that same person, Plaintiff
facetiously and ironically quipped in a single sentence that he
returned to
Vietnam after OCS as a �Butter Bar (SFC).� (�SFC� is the acronym for
Sergeant First Class). (Initially, the acronym �SFC� was obviously and
typographically inserted out of place in the sentence in error). What
Plaintiff
was attempting to say was that although he attended OCS, (Plaintiff
was forced
to leave OCS due to emergency leave in respect to an illness in his
family) he
ironically returned to Vietnam and completed some duties as a Platoon
Leader
as a SFC instead of a commissioned officer. However, one of the
leaders of the
Defendant smear gang forged Plaintiff�s Butter Bar statement by
deliberately
adding the words �(2nd Lieutenant) at the end of Plaintiff�s sentence
immediately following the term �Butter Bar.�
(F.1) After the Defendants deliberately forged Plaintiff�s Butter Bar
quip
by excogitating the terms �2nd Lieutenant� in Plaintiff�s sentence,
Plaintiff
informed Defendants on USENET immediately after Defendants published
that
said forgery that he did not write �2nd Lieutenant� in his sentence,
and that �2nd
Lieutenant� term was deliberately forged and was placed in Plaintiff�s
sentence
by one of the Defendants. Plaintiff also notified Defendants on USENET
in the
same post that Plaintiff did not mean nor never intended to
communicate nor
imply the term �2nd Lieutenant� when he used the pejorative term
�Butter Bar�
in his facetious and wise cracking statement as was clearly
misrepresented and
forged by Mr. Brooks.
(F.2). Plaintiff informed Defendants he was referencing a �Platoon
Leader� (SFC) when he used the term Butter Bar in the context of his
sentence.
Plaintiff further stated he had used and heard the pejorative term
�Butter Bar�
(or �BB�) to reference a �Platoon Leader� several times before in
private
conversations with his men and friends in the military. (Note that the
term
�Butter Bar� was also used by Plaintiff and others in the Military to
represent a
2nd Lieutenant, but �Butter Bar� was also used often by Plaintiff and
others to
likewise mean �Platoon Leader� - and �Platoon Leader� was clearly the
context
in which the Plaintiff used that term as the (SFC) acronym denoting
�Sergeant
First Class� was used by Plaintiff as an explainer in the same
sentence and
immediately after the Butter Bar term).

(F.3). Nevertheless, and regardless of Plaintiff�s explanations of his
intent, context and meaning in respect to his Butter Bar wisecrack,
and his
repeated posts informing Defendants precisely what he meant and what
intended to convey when he wrote the Butter Bar quip, and the
Defendant�s
public acknowledgment of Plaintiff�s explanations and stated intent
and
context, the Defendants completely ignored Plaintiff�s insight as to
his mind set
and intent in respect to said Butter Bar quip, and Defendants
continued to use
their own forgery and false defaming interpretation of Plaintiff�s
Butter Bar
quip as a basis to publish more than one thousand times that Plaintiff
was using
a special code to claim that he was a Second Lieutenant in Vietnam,
and
therefore Plaintiff had lied about his rank in Vietnam.
(F.4). The Defendants enabled, operated as a joint enterprise,
furthered
and orchestrated their defamation against Plaintiff with a claim that
the term �Butter Bar� can only mean a �2 Lieutenant� nd and nothing
else. (The Defendants of course
ignored completely Plaintiff�s (SFC) insert in the sentence -
representing a
Platoon Leader that was a NCO). Even when several other Veterans
openly
agreed with Plaintiff that a �Butter Bar� term can also be used to
reference a
Platoon Leader, and a SFC (the Platoon Sergeant) will automatically
become
the Platoon Leader whenever a commissioned officer was absent in the
Platoon,
(which was clearly the context Plaintiff used in his quip) the
Defendants then
fraudulently claimed all those that agreed with Plaintiff in respect
to this Butter
Bar issue were Plaintiff�s aliases. (One other Veteran that Plaintiff
did not
know and never met also used the term �Butter Bar� to directly
reference an
NCO that was his Platoon Leader in Vietnam on USENET, yet the
Defendants�
claimed that person was an alias of Plaintiff so they could
deliberately continue
and enable their malicious defamation of Plaintiff.)
(F.5). Regardless of Plaintiff�s explanation of what he meant in said
Butter Bar quip and his published substantiation that other Veterans
agreed with
the use of that Butter Bar slang term in the same manner and context
Plaintiff
used it to mean a Platoon Leader, and the clear fact none of the
Defendants
were privy to the private conversations Plaintiff had in the past with
his men
and/or friends in respect to the contexts in which he used the Butter
Bar slang
term, therefore the Defendants could not possibly know the intent nor
mind set
of Plaintiff when he wrote the Butter Bar quip unless the Defendants
also
professed to read minds, the Defendants repeatedly and falsely
published for
the obvious purpose of deliberate defamation (based upon Defendants�
own
forgery) hundreds of times that Plaintiff had claimed a higher rank
than he had
actually held.
(F.6). Defendants also deliberately ignored that in all posts prior to
the
Butter Bar quip Plaintiff had stated that he was an NCO, and had
further
previously confirmed that fact in statements he presented during court
proceedings in previous lawsuits long before the Butter Bar quip was
posted,
and that in the thousands of posts attributed to Plaintiff there was
never any
reference nor claim by Plaintiff that he was anything other than a
senior NCO
(and very proud of it) during his service in the US Army and Marine
Corps.

(F.7). A few Defendants even claimed they could read Plaintiff�s mind
because they were former Custom Agents and self-proclaimed experts on
military service, (although none of the Defendants served in the same
units nor
at the same times as the Plaintiff - and the self-proclaimed expert
spent only
two years in the US Army as a draftee and never achieved the rank of
even a
junior NCO). Yet because of the Defendant�s self-proclaimed expertise,
the
Defendants claimed to know what Plaintiff was thinking when Plaintiff
wrote
that Butter Bar quip, and thereby incited, enabled, and operated as a
joint
enterprise to create hundreds of defaming and false accusation
publications
about Plaintiff in respect to this issue alone. Plaintiff even tested
some of the
Defendants in respect to their knowledge of the US Army units that
Plaintiff
was assigned to, and the Defendant�s mind reading skills, and the
Defendants
failed those tests miserably.
(6.9). It eventually became clear to Plaintiff that Defendants did not
want
to know the truth if the truth could in any way hinder or expose their
smear
campaign for what it was.

(6.10). In yet another example of the defamation Defendants created
out
of thin air about Plaintiff, the Plaintiff once stated that he had in
his possession
a jungle disease health warning list that was published by Delta
Force. (These
documents can be found almost anywhere including on-line). That was
all
Plaintiff ever mentioned about �Delta Force.� Nevertheless,
Plaintiff�s simple
statement that he possessed such a document was then completely
distorted and
deliberately misinterpreted by the Defendants to fraudulently
represent that
Plaintiff was claiming he was or had been;
�A secret cross border assassin for delta force.�

(6.11). Such outrageous and blatantly false distortions and idiotic
interpretations of past statements by Plaintiff were regularly and
repeatedly used
to defame Plaintiff in thousands of different publications by
Defendants.
(6.11(a). Plaintiff regularly posted on the Doug Grant/DGVReiman
accounts that if anyone desired additional information or
clarification in respect
to anything posted on USENET under Plaintiff�s USENET accounts, to
please
email or telephone Plaintiff directly with any questions and Plaintiff
would
reply accordingly. Plaintiff posted his cell telephone number on
USENET for
that express purpose, and that number and email invitation was
extended to all
Defendants for months.
(6.11)(b). None of the Defendants ever contacted the Plaintiff via
email
or telephone to ask for any explanation or clarification of any text
or item
posted under any account Plaintiff used. Defendants always first
repeatedly
published the most defaming interpretation they could muster about
anything
they claimed Plaintiff wrote in the past without ever first verifying
what they
were publishing about Plaintiff was true and correct, or even whether
Plaintiff
actually wrote the quip or passage in question.
(6.12). For further examples of the threats and other actionable acts
Defendants perpetrated against Plaintiff and repeated thousands of
times, please
review the remainder of this Section, and Sections Eight and Eleven
contained
herein.
(6.13). The information presented below represents additional
samples of the thousands of predatory gangstalking attacks, obloquy,
harassment, libel, cyberstalking and defamation published and
perpetrated by Defendants against Plaintiff:
(6.13.a). Defaming on-line mockeries about Plaintiff published by
Defendants: (Once since removed from the Internet by Defendants gang
members after a false criminal complaint was filed against Plaintiff
by
Defendants).
http://home.comcast.net/~thuxton/douggrant.htm

http://www.geocities.com:80/ratmmjess/grant.html?200512
The above defaming video web sites depict Plaintiff as a 2nd
Lieutenant
disheveled fake war hero - which has been one of the many repeated
false
accusations about Plaintiff perpetrated by the Defendants. These web
sites are
clearly meant to be defaming, and are deliberately meant to contribute
to and
enable the common purpose smear campaign being waged by the Defendants
against Plaintiff in respect of Defendant�s false claim that Plaintiff
has claimed
false bravado in Vietnam, and has claimed the false military rank of
Second
Lieutenant.

(6.14) Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce completely forged, fraudulent, ridiculing and
defaming
documents about Plaintiff purportedly from the United States Federal
Bureau
of Investigation (FBI). See Exhibits .......
(6.15). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous, harassing and completely
fraudulent
child molestation accusations about Plaintiff. See Exhibits.........

(6.16). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous, harassing and completely
fraudulent
child porno use and transmission accusations against Plaintiff. See
Exhibits.........

(6.17). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce, false, harassing, libelous and fraudulent
accusations
that Plaintiff is a convicted criminal. See Exhibits.........
(6.18). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce, false, harassing, libelous and fraudulent
accusations
that Plaintiff is a car thief. See Exhibits.........
(6.19). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, fraudulent, libelous and harassing
statements
that Plaintiff is a wife beater. See Exhibits.........
(6.20). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce fraudulent, false and libelous statements that
Plaintiff
rapes twelve year-old girls.
See Exhibits_______.
(6.21). Defendants have repeatedly published, revealed and sent
through international commerce elements of plaintiff�s private and
personal
medical information. See Exhibits.........
(6.22). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce defaming, derogatory and libelous documents
containing the forged name of Plaintiff. Moreover, Defendants have
published
fraudulent misrepresentations, defaming documents and publications the
Defendants themselves forged and/or altered about Plaintiff (or were
written
by individuals other than the Plaintiff) and Defendants falsely and
repeatedly
stated and published that said misrepresentations and publications
were in fact
originally written by Plaintiff.
See Exhibits.........
(6.23). Defendants have forged the plaintiffs email name and real name
to USENET documents and to US Government forms, and have repeatedly
published and sent through international commerce defaming statements
and
misrepresentations to others under the Plaintiff�s forged name(s). See
Exhibits.........
(6.24). Defendants have forged a Medical Doctor�s name, and
repeatedly published and sent through international commerce false and
defaming medical diagnoses about Plaintiff under that forged medical
doctor�s
name. See Exhibits.........
(6.25). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce impersonations of a US Army General officer,
and
forged statements by that General Officer for the purpose of defaming
Plaintiff�s military service. See Exhibits.........

(6.26). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous and defaming statements that
Plaintiff�s
Veteran Administration benefits were �fraudulent or fake benefits.�
See
Exhibits.........
(6.27). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce distorted, defaming and false versions of
Plaintiff�s
honorable and extensive military service and records. Plaintiff has
honorable
discharges from both the US Army and the US Marine Corps.
(6.28). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce distorted and defaming results, and false
accusations,
in respect to Plaintiff�s past lawsuit(s) participation as a Plaintiff
and as an
expert witness against the casino industry and their agents. See
Exhibits.........

(6.29). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce forged and altered US Army regulations which
were
used to defame Plaintiff�s past military service, and paint Plaintiff
in a false
light in respect to lying about his military service in Vietnam.. See
Exhibits......
(6.30). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce information containing false, harassing,
libelous and
defaming publications stating or implying that Plaintiff received a
bad
discharge from the US Army. See Exhibits.........
(6.31). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, harassing, libelous and defaming
statements that
Plaintiff murdered entire families of Vietnam Veterans. See
Exhibits.........
(6.33). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, harassing, libelous and defaming
statements that
Plaintiff is a war criminal. See Exhibits.........
(6.34). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, harassing, libelous and defaming
statements
that Plaintiff was �unbalanced� and was committed to and was located
in a
mental institution: See Exhibits.........

(6.35). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce the locations of the Plaintiff�s addresses,
past and
present, for the purpose of inciting violence, stalking and harassment
against
Plaintiff, his property and family. Immediately after the said
publishing of
Plaintiff�s present home address by Defendants on the AWV newsgroup,
vandalism was perpetrated against Plaintiff�s vehicle, and Plaintiff
and
Plaintiff�s family started receiving harassing telephone calls. See
Exhibits.........

(6.36). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce impersonations of Plaintiff, and did steal and
use
Plaintiff�s identity for fraud and to obtain personal information
about Plaintiff.
See Exhibits.........
(6.37). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements they have without authorization
hacked into
Plaintiff�s computer and removed personal and proprietary information
from
Plaintiff�s computers. See Exhibits.........
(6.38). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce a collection of defaming statements and labels
representing �Kook votes� against Plaintiff, and used their gang to
vote
Plaintiff as a Kook on a Defendants� newsgroup that Defendants helped
to
design and manipulate exclusively to defame, stalk, harass and libel
Plaintiff.
See Exhibits.........

(6.39). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce defamation and malicious libel that Plaintiff
was
guilty of various child pornography crimes, and should be prosecuted
for such
alleged crimes. See Exhibits.........

(6.40). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements they filed false complaints about
Plaintiff
with the FBI, the Plaintiff�s Internet Service Provider, and other
entities and
law enforcement agencies against Plaintiff for child porno violations.
See
Exhibits.........
(6.41). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce several reproductions of plaintiff�s
copyrighted articles
for the exclusive purpose of defaming, stalking and harming Plaintiff,
which
represents infringement and violations of Plaintiff�s copyrights.
Defendants�
continued to infringe on Plaintiff�s copyrights in spite of the fact
the Defendants
were warned several times by Plaintiff to cease and desist violating
and
infringing on Plaintiff�s copyrights. Defendants further regularly
violated
Plaintiff�s copyrights by removing his copyright notice from his
articles and
then republishing them for the purpose of defamation, harassment and
other
harm to Plaintiff, and Defendants� further violated and infringed on
Plaintiff�s
copyrights and intellectual property by removing Plaintiff�s copyright
notices
from his articles, and then republishing Plaintiff�s articles for
profit, barter and
income on web sites owned and operated by Defendants. Moreover,
Defendants arrogantly incited and enabled others to violate and
infringe on
Plaintiff�s copyrights by publicly proclaiming that it was impossible
to
copyright articles posted on USENET. See Exhibits.........

(6.42). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous and harassing statements that
Plaintiff
will commit bodily injury on others, and falsely published and sent
through
international commerce statements that Plaintiff has stalked or
harassed others
under the provisions of the Washington State Unlawful Harassment
statutes due
to Plaintiff and his Lawyer sending Defendants notices to cease and
desist their
harassment and stalking, and because Plaintiff proposed a way to avoid
litigation by retracting and removing all objectionable publications,
and cease
and desist producing such in the future. See Exhibits......

(6.43). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous and harassing statements that
Plaintiff
tortured prisoners in Vietnam. See Exhibits.........
(6.44). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous and harassing statements that
Plaintiff
murdered prisoners of war and feasted on their dead bodies. See
Exhibits.........
(6.45). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false, libelous and harassing statements that
Plaintiff
participated in the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. See Exhibits:____.

(6.46) Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements they have informed, notified and
provided
via email, web site, telephone, direct conversations and regular mail,
former
military comrades of Plaintiff, the Governor of the State of
Washington, the
Washington State Attorney General, the Sheriff�s Department of Clark
County,
Washington, the FBI and many other similar law enforcement entities,
church
groups, Muslim Mosques, Veteran Administrations, Veteran Hospitals, of
the
false accusations, defamation, obloquy and outrageous gross
misrepresentations
of what the Defendants falsely and erroneously claim Plaintiff meant
to portray
and asseverate in text contained in articles and statements Plaintiff
has written
or dictated to be published in the past. See Exhibits.........

(6.47) Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements they intend to continue to notify
friends and
acquaintances of Plaintiff, and numerous Government officials, of
Defendants�
false and fraudulent statements, obloquies, and defaming accusations
about
Plaintiff unless Plaintiff stops posting his rebuttals to Defendants�
fraud and
false accusations on USENET, and that Plaintiff further stop posting
his
political and contemporary issue opinion articles on other newsgroups.
Defendants have made it clear to Plaintiff they will use threats,
intimidation and
harassment to force Plaintiff to stop exercising his First Amendment
Constitutional Rights on USENET. See Exhibits _____.

(6.48). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce corrupted, distorted, forged and deliberately
falsely
interpreted past musings, figure of speeches, wisecracks, epigrams and
quip
type comments written or dictated by Plaintiff or by others associated
with
Plaintiff. Such corruption, deliberate misinterpretations and/or
forgeries of
Plaintiff�s or his associates past comments or dictation were
published and
effected by Defendants so as to alter, modify and distort those said
comments
to make them appear as preposterous and ridiculous claims by Plaintiff
of
superhuman feats, false bravado, ridiculous combat boasting,
cannibalism,
secret agent employment, employment as a cross border assassin, a war
criminal, a murderer, a killer of unarmed priests, personally killed
1803 enemy
soldiers in Vietnam, and other obviously preposterous and clearly
imaginary
events and actions. Such outrageous fraudulent misrepresentations of
Plaintiff�s
and his associates, and others unknown to Plaintiff, past comments
were
deliberately, recklessly and/or negligently used by Defendants to
defame, libel,
harass and stalk Plaintiff and malign and impugn his character with
other
Veterans and the general public, and perpetrate other actionable acts
against
Plaintiff as are so defined in Section Eleven (11) below.
See Exhibits.........
(6.49) Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce false statements that Plaintiff is claiming to
possess a
Purple Heart Medal, although Plaintiff has notified and informed
Defendants
several times that he was not awarded the Purple Heart Medal, and has
further
publicly posted on USENET several times that he does not possess any
Purple
Heart Medal, and has further informed Defendants dozens of times that
Plaintiff
has never stated nor wrote, that he possessed such a medal.

(6.50). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements they have deliberately scheduled and
conducted meetings with Muslim Mosques and have informed and provided
the
Mullahs in control of those Mosques of past articles written by
Plaintiff about
Radical Islam, our war on terror, Muslim laws, and the
Israeli/Palestinian issue.
Defendants have also published and sent through international commerce
statements that the Defendants� have presented to these said Mullahs
the
Defendants� own fabricated and false interpretations, accusations, and
obloquy
forged and distorted by the Defendants in respect to past articles
published and
written by Plaintiff. The deliberate contacting of Muslim Mosques
about
Plaintiff, and providing those Mosques with false information about
Plaintiff,
can only be construed by any reasonable person as yet another example
of the
Defendants� deliberate enabling and incitement to cause extreme
emotional
distress, violence, death and injury on and against Plaintiff.
(6.51). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements that Plaintiff has been and is
committed to a
mental institution, and have further stated that Plaintiff is under
the care of a
psychiatrist, and is mentally unbalanced.
(6.52). Under the false pretense and guise of �confirming or
disproving� past �quips,� �figures of speech� �wisecracks� �epigrams�
�musings� and other similar comments by Plaintiff and his associates,
including
forgeries and deliberate false interpretations falsely alleged to have
been
written by Plaintiff or his associates in respect to his past military
service,
Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through international
commerce
thousands of harassing, stalking and defaming statements, defaming and
harassing false accusations, obloquy, defaming and harassing
forgeries,
defaming and harassing fraudulent misrepresentations, defaming and
harassing
impersonations, threats of violence and death, defaming and harassing
blatantly
false conclusions and interpretations of alleged past writings by
plaintiff, and
defaming and harassing false interpretations of plaintiff�s past
publications,
quips, wisecracks, epigrams, musings, fiction, figures of speech and
non
asseverations of fact clearly designed to accentuate a point or
embellish a story
that were contained within one of Plaintiff�s thousands of published
articles.
Such distortions and defamation perpetrated by Defendants are clearly
designed
to deliberately and/or negligently harass, stalk, threaten, defame and
severally
and irreparably injure Plaintiff�s reputation, and cause Plaintiff
extreme
emotional distress and trepidation, and to perpetrate all other
actionable acts
against Plaintiff that represent a basis for this complaint.
(6.53). Defendants have repeatedly created, recreated and modified and
then published and sent through international commerce several (Eight
and
counting) international web sites containing statements and
representations that
directly and fraudulently associate and connect Plaintiff under the
same
defaming heading and banner of �A Tangled Web.� This banner or heading
is
designed on said web sites to fraudulently connect Plaintiff with
individuals that
have allegedly lied about their military service in the respect of
claiming to once
have been a POW in Vietnam, and further allegedly lied about their
possession
of medals of valor.
(6.53.a) Such deliberate false association and false connection of
Plaintiff under the same Web Site banner of �A Tangled Web� posted on
not
less than eight different international web sites, to deliberately
and/or
negligently present and display Plaintiff in a false light and
chimerically and
falsely connect Plaintiff together with individuals that may or may
have not
made outrageous false claims about their military service, represents
abhorrent,
unethical and negligent fraud, misrepresentations, a clear attempt to
defame
Plaintiff by false association, present Plaintiff in a false light,
assassinate the
character of Plaintiff, and further represents a deliberate and
negligent attempt
by Defendants to add credibility to their defamation, fraud,
forgeries, false
accusations and obloquy published by Defendants about Plaintiff more
than
three thousand times so far, and to further and contribute to
Defendants�
actionable acts perpetrated against Plaintiff as are specified in
Causes of Action
in the attached complaint.

(6.54). Defendants have sought to interfere with and halt the
publishing of a
book and courses of study under construction by Plaintiff, and
Defendants
further attempted to maliciously dissuade Plaintiff from pursuing
legal claims
against Defendants related to the said libel and defamation referenced
herein by
implying they were �Federal Agents� or other law enforcement officials
that
would take some type of retaliatory action against the Plaintiff
should he
address their defamation and threats in a court of law. Defendants
actually
filed a false and frivolous criminal complaint against Plaintiff in
the
Washington State Clark Country Sheriff�s office to further their
harassment and
stalking against Plaintiff. . See Exhibits _____.

(6.55). Defendants have published and sent through international
commerce statements they have involved and were contacted by the
United
States Custom Service in their campaign to defame Plaintiff, and have
further
stated and published they caused �a file to be constructed� against
Plaintiff in
that Federal Agency. Defendants have further published they have
caused an
�investigation� to be launched against Plaintiff presumably from that
sane
Federal Agency . See Exhibits _____.
(6.56). Defendants have created, established and published not less
than
eight different international web sites for the express purpose to
increase and
expand their defamation, harassment, obloquies, stalking and malicious
libel
against Plaintiff, and to achieve profit and income thereby.
Defendants have
sent links to those said harassing and defaming web sites to numerous
people
and entities throughout the world, and have also emailed or otherwise
distributed the contents of those said defaming web sites and the
lies,
defamation, obloquy and falsehoods contained therein to former
military
service members that were past comrades of Plaintiff during the
Vietnam war.

Such activities by Defendants can only be construed by any reasonable
person
as a further example of Defendants� purpose of harassing Plaintiff and
causing
him extreme emotional distress, profiting from the fraudulent
controversy the
Defendants have created about Plaintiff, and furthering the other
actionable
acts Defendants have perpetrated against Plaintiff as are specified in
the Section
titled Causes of Action contained in the attached complaint of Douglas
G.
Reiman v. John Does et al.

(6.56.a) Although Defendants were informed by several Web Host
managers that the said eight web sites the Defendants were using to
defame and
harass Plaintiff, and profit from such defamation, were in violation
of their
Web host�s terms of service in respect to the Defendants� Web Sites
obviously
containing defamation and harassment, and all eight of those said web
sites
were forced down by their web hosts, the Defendants have arrogantly
recreated
duplicate web sites containing the same and added defamation,
obloquies, and
harassment against Plaintiff in conjunction with several new offshore
web
hosting entities. See Exhibits _____.

(6.57). Defendants have created special offshore international web
sites
containing dozens of aforementioned fraudulent accusations, defamation
and
obloquies, about Plaintiff, implied and otherwise, and have published
and sent
through international commerce statements they have sent the contents
of those
said defaming offshore web sites, and online links to said sites, to
(1) the
Governor of the State of Washington, (2) the Attorney General of the
State of
Washington, (3) the Veterans Administration, the US Army, US Army
Officer
Candidate School, (4) Veteran Hospitals, (5) Muslim Mosques, and other
similar entities and persons the Defendants s believe could further
their
harassment, defamation, obloquy and emotional distress of Plaintiff,
and if
such said entities could be deceived by Defendants� false
representations about
Plaintiff, also might assist Defendants in casting the Plaintiff in a
false light
and disgracing and humiliating Plaintiff and helping the Defendants�
destroy
Plaintiff�s reputation and his trade, and further cause Plaintiff even
more
extreme emotional distress than normal. See Exhibits _____.
(6.58). Defendants have have regularly conspired together,
orchestrated, cooperated, enabled, operated with a common purpose and
as a
joint enterprise, and helped to contribute, to the use of email,
regular mail,
personal contact, and the telephone, and other means of communication,
to
facilitate the dissemination and distribution of their defamation,
harassment,
libel and fraud against Plaintiff, and to perpetrate the other
actionable acts
against Plaintiff so specified in Section Eleven (11) below. . See
Exhibits
_____.

(6.59). Defendants have used their harassment, defamation, lies,
obloquies, forgeries and other actionable overt acts against
Plaintiff, published
on their aforementioned web sites, for the purpose of racketeering as
the
Defendants profited or otherwise derived income or barter from their
Web Sites
from the sale of merchandise, advertisements and/or profited from a
rebate of
ISP or Web Host fees. See Exhibits _____.

(6.60) Defendants have published and sent through international
commerce statements that they had forged Plaintiff�s �s name to
Government
documents so as to obtain personal information about Plaintiff from
the US
Army Personnel Center in St. Louis, Mo. The US Army Personnel Center
has
informed Plaintiff that seven such requests for information about
Plaintiff�s
military service records have been received over Plaintiff�s
signature, yet
Plaintiff has only filed three such requests. See Exhibits _____.
(6.61). Defendants have created, used, and incited and enabled others
to
use, published and repeatedly sent through international commerce,
speech that
"is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is
likely to
induce or produce such action." See Exhibits__________.
End Exhibit �B�
Douglas G. Reiman
v.
John Does, et al.

Douglas G. Reiman
v.
John Does, et al
Civil Action Docket No.________________.
EXHIBIT �C� PUBLISHED THREATS OF VIOLENCE PERPETRATED
BY THE DEFENDANTS AND PREDATORY GANG STALKING
AGAINST PLAINTIFF.
(8.0). Below represents a partial listing of the more recent threats
of
violence and Death published against Plaintiff by the Defendants:
(Note all
dates stated herein are in YY/MM/DD format).
(8.0(a). RE: In respect to the threats listed in this section
published by
Defendants, such are presented under the guidance of how the Fourth
United
States Circuit Court explained such threats in the Draby case under
Title 18,
U.S.C. � 875, to wit:
"Whether a communication in fact contains a true threat is determined
by the
interpretation of a reasonable recipient [meaning, the person to whom
the threat
was directed] familiar with the context of the communication."

(8.1). Defendants have have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements that Plaintiff�s �needs a good
beating.�
See Exhibit �P.1, and P.2" from alias of gang member DOUGLAS REESE
POSTED ON 050408. This threatening statement published and delivered
to
Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that have been regularly and
systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can only
be
interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause bodily harm to
Plaintiff.
(8.2). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce vitriolic statements that threatened to �greet
Plaintiff
in the parking lot� in a threatening context and manner if Plaintiff
dared to
attend a reunion of his fellow Veterans. See Exhibits �A.1, A.2, A.3
(THREAT
ON A.3). 060408 POST FROM �BIG BEAR� GANG MEMBER (A.K.A.
ALFRED SNYDER). This threatening statement was published and delivered
to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that have been regularly and
systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months, and
such threats
in context can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to
cause bodily
harm to Plaintiff should he attempt to visit a reunion consisting of
fellow
Vietnam veterans.

(8.3). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce, vitriolic and in context threatening
statements to
Plaintiff stating �I hope (plaintiff) will not eat a gun.� See
Exhibits �B.1, B2.,

B.3, B.4" POST FROM STEVEL GANG MEMBER 050328. This threatening
statement published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by
Defendants that
have been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening
Plaintiff for
months can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to
cause death or
bodily harm to Plaintiff.

(8.4). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce, vitriolic and in context threatening
statements to
Plaintiff stating: �Fuck off and eat a gun.� See Exhibit �C�. This
publication
is again from STEVEL GANG MEMBER posted on 050524. This gang
member made his first threat in (8.3) above very clear after Plaintiff
complained
about Defendants� first threat to �not eat a gun.� This threatening
statement
published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that
have
been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff
for months
can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause
death or bodily
harm to Plaintiff.
(8.5). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce, vitriolic and in context threatening
statements to
Plaintiff stating: �Somebody sue this jerk Doug.....or shoot
him....either
way.� See Exhibit �BB.1, BB.2, BB.3�. This post is again from STEVEL
GANG MEMBER posted on 060918. This said Defendant is deliberately
making his threats very clear to Plaintiff in (8.3) and (8.4) above
after Plaintiff
complained about his first �eat a gun� threat. This threatening
statement has
been published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members
that
have been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening
Plaintiff for
months, and can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat
to cause
death or bodily harm to Plaintiff.
(8.6). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce the intimidating, harassing and clearly
threatening
announcement and obituary notice of Plaintiffs�s death. See Exhibits
�F�,
�G� �H.1 AND H.2" SHARKEY AND STEVEL GANG MEMBER POSTS
050422. This threatening statement published and delivered to
Plaintiff via
USENET by gang members that have been regularly and systematically
harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can only be interpreted
by
Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or bodily harm to
Plaintiff.
(8.7). Defendants have published repeatedly and sent through
international commerce the warning that the publishing of the said
announcement and obituary notice of the Plaintiff�s death was in
context to
be meant to be a �death threat warning to Plaintiff.� See Exhibit �G�
050422 POST FROM STEVEL GANG MEMBER. This threatening statement
published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that
have
been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff
for months
can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause
death and/or
bodily harm to Plaintiff.

(8.8). Defendants have published and sent through international
commerce the warning to Plaintiff that �you probably think someone
will
deck you� (or words to that effect) implying in context that if
Plaintiff takes
any legal action against the Defendants the Plaintiff will then be
�decked� even
in a court of law. Such threat is clearly a threat of violence and
harassment as
all previous posts from this Defendant gang member represent
deliberate,
reckless and/or negligent harassment and defamation against Plaintiff
) See
Exhibits �I.1 AND I.2" 050321 POST FROM CHARLES PENELY GANG
MEMBER. (Note that gang member Charles Penley has tried to hide
several of
his threats by removing them from Google archives.) This threatening
statement published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang
members
that have been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening
Plaintiff
for months can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to
cause
bodily harm to Plaintiff.
(8.9). Defendants have published and sent through international
commerce the direct threat that �Plaintiff will end up in a bad way�
in the
context that if Plaintiff continues to complain about the gang�s
defamation�
(or words to that effect). See Exhibit �J� posted by gang member RITA
HANSARD AND RE-POSTED BY GANG MEMBER CHARLES PENLEY
050408. This threatening statement published and delivered to
Plaintiff via
USENET by gang members that have been regularly and systematically
harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can only be interpreted
by
Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or bodily harm to
Plaintiff.

(8.10). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce statements that �Plaintiff will get his behind
kicked.�
In the context that unless Plaintiff stops complaining about the smear
tactics of the gang. See Exhibits �M1.M2" POSTED BY GANG MEMBER
CHARLES PENLEY 050418 This threatening statement published and
delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that have been
regularly
and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can
only be
interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or
bodily harm to
Plaintiff.
(8.11). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce the threat to Plaintiff that �you need a good
old time
beating,� In the context that the gang leader said Plaintiff was not a
military Veteran yet Plaintiff continued to insist (rightfully) that
he was.
See Exhibits �P1.P2" POSTED BY GANG MEMBER DOUG REECE 050408
AND BY SEVERAL ALIASES. This threatening statement published and
delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that have been
regularly
and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can
only be
interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or
bodily harm to
Plaintiff.
(8.12). Defendants have repeatedly published and sent through
international commerce the following statement in respect to �doing
something
to Plaintiff� and the Defendants ended his threat with the sound of a
gun
shot; (Bang!). Considering the vitriolic and harassing context of
previous
posts by this specific gang member, this threat of violence against
Plaintiff was
received by Plaintiff as a clear and unmistakable threat to cause
death and/or
bodily harm to Plaintiff.
See Exhibits �P1.P2"POSTED BY GANG MEMBER DOUG REECE 050408
AND ALIAS. This threatening statement published and delivered to
Plaintiff
via USENET by gang members that have been regularly and systematically
harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can only be interpreted
by
Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or bodily harm to
Plaintiff.
(8.12)(a). The following represents an actual quotation of the alleged
threat of violence against Plaintiff stated in (8.13) above:

(8.12)(b). �You asshole can refer to me as "GANG" , I repeat
everything Nigel has uttered, spoken or written to this point, you're
a
worthless pile of lying dog shit, you need a good old time beating,
you're a
wannabe, who can only dream of the Real Combat Veteran's of Viet Nam.
Those MEN with balls swinging between their legs, you're dickless and
have a hole there. Since the VA said I'm crazy and there's records to
that
effect. I can do almost anything I want and just say I was crazy at
the time
they'll sentence me to more shrink and group time so sue me too.
Bang

The Gang of one
Doug (the other, but not the other Doug, just, you know, the other�
(Note the person referenced as �Nigel� in the above threat is believed
to be
one of the main leaders, inciters, enablers, contributors, and
conspirators
of the Defendants� smear merchant gang.)

(8.13). The said Defendants have published and repeatedly sent through
international commerce statements to Plaintiff that one of the gang
members
will �take plaintiff�s head home on a stick.� This clear and
unmistakable
threat of violence and death was delivered to Plaintiff in the context
of use that
Plaintiff must stop posting his demand for the Defendants to cease and
desist
their harassment, and for Plaintiff to cease publishing his rebuttals
to
Defendants� harassment on USENET or experience �his head on a stick.�
See
Exhibits �DD1.DD2.DD3.DD4.DD5 POSTED BY GANG MEMBER
PEPPERONI (a.k.a. Thomas Huxton) 060903. This threatening statement
published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that
have
been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff
for months
can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause
death and/or
bodily harm to Plaintiff.

(8.14). FBI and Attorney General Notice: The said Defendants have
published repeatedly sent through international commerce several
REPEATED statements to Plaintiff announcing and proclaiming
Plaintiff�s death. Plaintiff�s receipt of published obituary notices
from
Defendants that have been regularly and systematically defaming,
harassing
and threatening Plaintiff for years can only be construed by Plaintiff
as yet
another death threat. Such dismemberment and other death threats have
been
received from what is believed members of the Defendants� gang since
1988.
Below is an excerpt from a complaint Plaintiff�s Attorney (at that
time) sent the
FBI and the Attorney General on March 21, 2001. It is impossible to
determine
(at this time) if some of the same individuals are involved in the
most recent
threats against Plaintiff that were also involved in the previous
attacks and
threats against Plaintiff. However, the Plaintiff did receive an Email
allegedly
from the main previous casino related stalker, (Mr. Brubin), after
Plaintiff
posted a recent rebuttal to one of the present-day smear merchant
Defendants�s
false accusations. This Brubin previous Defendant made his presence
known
and revealed his involvement in the present-day Defendant smear
merchant
gang with the following email:
See Exhibits AT.1 through AT.3, and Exhibits �BR.1 and BR.2"
representing email to Plaintiff allegedly from � BRRUBIN� a person
identified
a one of the main Defendants mentioned in Mr. Altschuler�s letter to
the
Attorney General and to the FBI.

The following is an excerpt from the letter to the Attorney General
and the FBI
dated March 21, 2001 prepared by Plaintiff�s Attorney at that time,
Mr. Howard
Alschuler.
�INTERNET ATTACKS SEEKING TO INTERFERE WITH MY CLIENTS�
LEGAL AND POLITICAL EFFORTS
After I was retained in 1997, my clients hired an expert witness, a
renowned mathematician. The expert issued a report that strongly
supported my
clients� claims that one of the unadvertised procedures used by
casinos (known
as the �preferential shuffle�), altered the normal chance and random
character of
blackjack. If the expert�s math was correct (as well as the view of
independent
blackjack experts, see Part III), the preferential shuffle altered the
outcome of
the game and permitted casinos to literally determine which blackjack
patrons
would win or lose at blackjack.
After releasing the report, the expert received email from one or more
of
those who had been sending emails to my clients. Inexplicably, after
receiving
the email, the expert ceased to communicate with my clients or myself.
He even
refused my repeated written requests and telephone messages to send my
clients
an invoice for the expert report he wrote. Experts do not work without
pay; the
failure to invoice for his work after receiving this email is highly
suspicious, to
say the least.
At around the same time the expert received such email, some of the
phone calls and emails, has been repeatedly followed, and even had his
car
dusted for fingerprints by some unknown individual(s). Although he
reported
this to the local police in Las Vegas, Nevada, they refused to
investigate, on
grounds that no law had been broken. A police officer told my client
that the
fingerprint dust may have been purposely left on the car as a warning
that my
client�s fingerprints had been lifted; apparently, this is a technique
used to
silence potential witnesses by implicitly threatening that their
fingerprints could
be planted at the scene of a crime.
Immediately after the fingerprinting, my client had a brake failure in
his
brand new automobile, the cause of which was never determined. Because
of
these physical threats, my client and his wife were forced to move
from a home
and an area they loved in Las Vegas to Washington State. I should note
that this
client is the leader of the legal and political action and most active
in pursuing
claims against the casinos and those who sell what my clients consider
to be
fraudulent blackjack systems of play that deceive the public.
While any one incident by itself (and others not mentioned in this
letter)
might not justify the intervention of your office, there have been
literally
thousands of emails received by my clients over the past six years and
they
continue to this day. The computer virus attacks appear to be
increasing in
frequency with the most recent reports of such viruses from clients in
Washington, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

My clients have made and continue to make efforts to end these casino
practices but have been met with threats, pornographic and offensive
email,
and, potentially, interference with an expert in a federal civil case,
or even one
or more sitting judges.
All of this and more is happening amid a flurry of recent news reports
regarding gambling industry tactics that raise the level of concern.
One report is
of a casino employee indicted for murder, another of legislators in
various states
convicted of taking bribes from casino industry employees, and even a
recent
news report that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was reluctant to
share
information with the New Jersey Casino Control Commission during an
investigation related to organized crime in New Jersey.
In the meantime, the Internet virus and verbal attacks continue
against my
clients and immediate action is needed. Besides being in physical
fear,
heightened by the fact the identities of these Internet attackers and
their
connections to the casino industry and/or organized crime are not
known, my
clients are also afraid to pursue certain very profitable business
opportunities in
re .establishing the mock casinos that were so popular in 1990 and
thereabouts.
My clients have been targeted with computer viruses, threats,
harassing
and offensive email, possible witness tampering, and even physical
confrontations, in ways that appear to be related to their legal
action seeking to
end what they view as deceptive practices or faulty regulatory
oversight of the
casino industry. This raises a concern that those perpetrating the
Internet attacks
may be motivated by some connection to the casino industry or the
regulators.
See Part III.
My clients seek the intervention of the Justice Department. My clients
believe that an investigation of the recent threats will uncover
connections to
the earlier threats, including the bomb threats. Whatever an
investigation
ultimately discloses, the fact remains that it appears on the face of
it that there
are federal crimes being violated now.
Clearly, one or more individuals made a tremendous effort over the
past
six years to send thousands of emails to my clients to harass and
threaten. We
hope the Justice Department can determine the identities of these
individuals
and learn whether they are merely isolated sick individuals with
nothing better
to do then spend tremendous amounts of time and effort harassing my
clients
for no reason, or part of a larger conspiracy of those with financial
motivation to
pursue my clients.
END EXCERPT FOR (8.14.
(8.15). Defendants have published and repeatedly sent through
international commerce statements containing a request to �find a
marksman�
then a detailed description on how to kill vermin, then in that same
publication referenced Plaintiff as a vermin, and stated in the same
post
that Plaintiff would stink up high heaven like vermin after he is
killed. See
Exhibits �NB1.NB2.NB3 POSTED BY GANG MEMBER NIGEL BROOKS
ON JULY 4, 2005, AT 6:15 PM. This threatening statement published and
delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang members that have been
regularly
and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can
only be
interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or
bodily harm to
Plaintiff.
(8.16). Defendants have have published and repeatedly sent through
international commerce statements that they �are tailing Plaintiff in
their
cars� whenever Plaintiff left his home. Such threats to �tail
Plaintiff in their
cars whenever Plaintiff left his home� is clearly meant to threaten
personal
contact, violence, intimidation and harassment. See Exhibits �8A and
8B�
POSTED BY GANG MEMBER ALIAS �POLITICAL PAGEN� POSTED
050709. This threatening statement published and delivered to
Plaintiff via
USENET by gang members that have been regularly and systematically
harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can only be interpreted
by
Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or bodily harm to
Plaintiff.

(8.17). Defendants have published and repeatedly sent through
international commerce a question to all USENET subscribers whether
�Plaintiff should be tortured.� This threatening statement and threat
published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by several gang
members
that have been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening
Plaintiff
for months (years) can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious
threat to
cause death and/or bodily harm to Plaintiff. See Exhibits �SP1 and
SP2"
POSTED BY GANG MEMBER ALIAS SPARKY ON 060916.

(8.18). Defendants have published and repeatedly sent through
international commerce statements that requested Plaintiff be �shot.�
This
threatening statement and threat published and delivered to Plaintiff
via
USENET by gang members that have been regularly and systematically
harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can only be interpreted
by
Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or bodily harm to
Plaintiff. (One
of the Defendants gang members actually repeated this threat and
deliberately
republished it when Plaintiff demanded it be removed from USENET. See
Exhibit �BB.1, BB.2, BB.3�. Note this post has been also removed from
Google archive, and the post is again from STEVEL GANG MEMBER posted
on 060918.

(8.19). Defendants have published and repeatedly sent through
international commerce statements recommending that Plaintiff�s �Hands
be
cut off� to stop Plaintiff from using a computer. This threatening
statement
and threat published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by gang
members
that have been regularly and systematically harassing and threatening
Plaintiff
for months can only be interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to
cause death
and/or bodily harm to Plaintiff. See Exhibit s CC.1 through CC.3,
POSTED
BY GANG MEMBER ALIAS RED JACKET ON 050406.

(8.20) Subject: Fw: Nomination - Doug Grant von Reiman for
UNABOMBER SURPRISE {Re: BS Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:48:13 -0500
Red Jacket �I hereby nominate Doug Grant von Reiman (Doogie Grant) for
the UnabomberSurprise Award. Seconds, anyone?� �Oh, yes. Seconded.
�Kali.� This threatening statement and threat published and delivered
to
Plaintiff via USENET by two or more gang members that have been
regularly
and systematically harassing and threatening Plaintiff for months can
only be
interpreted by Plaintiff as a serious threat to cause death and/or
bodily harm to
Plaintiff and Plaintiff�s family in the form of sending Plaintiff
letter bombs
(UNABOMBER SURPRISE) that could be opened by Plaintiff or by his
family
members. See Exhibit s ........, POSTED BY GANG MEMBER ALIAS RED
JACKET AND KALI ON 060219
(8.21). Le Janitor May 30, 8:35 am show options Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam
From: "Le Janitor" <awrlibr...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this
author
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:35:42 GMT Local: Mon,May 30 2005 8:35 am
Subject: Re: DGVREIMAN Elected Pope Reply | Reply to Author | Forward
|
Print | Individual Message |
�
Mebbe he'll slip up and have some vet hand him his ticket personally
today. would be fitting...and Memorial for sure.� . This threatening
statement published and delivered to Plaintiff via USENET by two or
more
gang members that have been regularly and systematically harassing and
threatening Plaintiff for months can only be interpreted by Plaintiff
as a serious
threat to cause death and/or bodily harm to Plaintiff and Plaintiff �s
family.
See Exhibit s ........, POSTED BY GANG MEMBER ALIAS LE JANITOR ON
050530.
End Exhibit �C�
Douglas G. Reiman
v. John Does, et al.
Civil Action Docket No._________________.

Douglas G. REIMAN v. John Does et al.
EXHIBIT �D� PAST CASINO LAWSUIT
CONNECTION TO NEW COMPLAINT
Douglas G. Reiman
v.
John Does et al Civil Case Docket No.________________
ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF, PLAINTIFF�S PAST LAWSUITS
AGAINST CASINO CHEATING ARE CONNECTED TO THIS ACTION
(9.0). Reference to a Web Site that provides a copy of the previous
lawsuit filed.
http://tinyurl.com/2m2ntq (Copy of previous Federal Libel and
Harassment
Lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by Plaintiff and
other
Plaintiffs).
http://groups.google.com/group/namesofcyberstalkers/
(See Copy of Previous Federal Lawsuit Filed).
OVERVIEW
(9.1). The Plaintiff Douglas G. Reiman and Doug Grant (Tm) have
alleged
and proved though their extensive mathematical and experiential
expertise on
Douglas G. REIMAN v. John Does et al.
casino games, that casinos and purveyors of card counting systems
worked
closely together to sell books and other card counting aids even
though the use of
un-advertised �game altering countermeasures� by the casinos made the
use of
such systems worthless (and on average, caused those who used such
systems to
lose more money than if they had used any system at all).
(9.2). The Plaintiff Douglas G. Reiman and Doug Grant (Tm), with the
support of three prominent university math professors, and many other
similar
experts and authors on casino games, including two law professors that
are
experts on Gambling and the law, have proved though their extensive
mathematical and experiential expertise on casino games that casino
cheating in
respect to the game of Blackjack is rampant and widespread throughout
most
casinos that are operational in the United States.
�Cheating� in this respect is defined as:
�Cheating In the respect the casinos are using a clandestine technique
to
secretly alter the rules of the game of Blackjack in the casinos�
favor
without first notifying their patrons they have the right to do so,
and are
altering the game after the patrons have already wagered their money
on
the table based upon completely different posted rules of the game.
The
only way any patron would ever know the casinos are secretly
manipulating the rules of the game in favor of the casino (THE
PREFERENTIAL SHUFFLE BASED UPON CASINO CARD COUNTING)
is if the patron was an accomplished card counter. Further, contrary
to
the ridiculous and false claim by the Defendants, it is virtually
impossible
to simply leave a casino to avoid the effect of said cheating. That
act
would be similar to claiming a victim could avoid the effects of a
pickpocket by simply walking away from the pickpocket AFTER the
pickpocket had already removed the victims wallet.�
(9.3). As part of a concerted, orchestrated and joint enterprise
effort to
discredit and dissuade the Plaintiff who attempted to relate his and
other expert�s
views about casino cheating on USENET, or to pursue legal claims for
malicious
libel, cyberstalking, cyberharassment, unlawful harassment, libel per
se and
defamation in a court of law, some of the said Defendants used the
Internet,
Web Sites and USENET to anonymously harass and stalk Plaintiff with
thinly
and not so thinly veiled threats of death and serious injury, and
defamation, and
threaten to continue such wrongful acts should Plaintiff pursue any
course of
action against the Cyberstalking and Harassment gang, or against the
casino
agents involved in any fraud and cheating.
(9.3.a). These said published messages were at times sent through an
anonymous re-mailer service, Proxy Server, or through an Agent, which
hides
not only the identity of the sender, but the sender�s original
Internet Service
Provider (ISP).

(9.4). The Defendants also used the Internet and USENET and many
other means of publications, both electronic and otherwise, meetings,
telephone
calls, web sites, home pages, and personal and public conversations to
publish
and relate additional ridicule, defamation , obloquy and libel against
Plaintiff, as
well as invade his privacy and threaten his property, his family and
his life.

(9.5). Douglas G. Reiman has also been the target of voice telephone
threats and impersonations made to his home(s) in Washington State.
Defendants have sent viruses to Plaintiff�s computer that allowed them
to enter
and use Plaintiff�s computer to send email and post forged messages on
USENET under the account of Plaintiff, or under the account of his LFP
group,
his associates, all without Plaintiff�s knowledge or approval.

(9.6). On information and belief, John Doe Defendants members
engaged in these multiple acts in a concerted, conspiratorial, common
purpose,
joint enterprise and otherwise organized fashion over a period of
several months,
to further their own financial interests, and to defame, stalk, harass
and harm
Plaintiff in life, business, reputation and property, and to cause
Plaintiff and his
family extreme emotional distress, fear, extreme trepidation and
intimidation.

(9.6) (a). Defendants realize if the truth about casino cheating is
revealed
to the general public , their businesses will be adversely affected,
as well as the
casino industry and its shadow industries in general.

(9.6) (b). Many Defendants further enjoy profits, income, and
celebrity
status due to web sites they construct to smear and defame
individuals, and
these Defendants realize if the truth is revealed about how they use
false and
fraudulent accusations to attract hits and advertisers, and sell
products from their
own companies and others on such web sites which they regularly
publish on
multiple international Web Hosts, they will not only lose revenue from
their web
sites but also would lose credibility and fame.
(9.7). On or about 2004 several settlement agreements were reached
with
casino related lawsuit Defendants that were identified during previous
harassment and stalking lawsuits initiated by Plaintiff and
approximately sixty
(60)other Plaintiffs.
(61)
(9.7.a). On or about December 26, 1998, The BRubin7878 alias
threatened Plaintiff with the following:
�That is because you crossed the line Doug. You don�t even begin to
understand
what you are playing with. I will now dedicate all of my free time to
you Doug.
You are now my mission. This does not mean just on the net, Doug. I
will see to
it that every responsible human being that you have dealt with or will
deal with
will know what you are about.�
(9.7.b). Plaintiff alleges that this Defendant (Brubin) has indeed
kept his
promise to perpetrate, enable, contribute, and/or incite the
actionable overt acts
against Plaintiff listed the complaints Causes of Action, and has done
so while
using several different internet aliases and ISP�s, and has further
conspired with
and incited, enticed and enabled others to join his proclaimed
campaign of
defamation and other said actionable overt acts against Plaintiff. Mr.
Rubin�s
threat to take his actions off the net and continue his attack against
Plaintiff in
real life lends to the conviction by Plaintiff the threats of violence
and death
published by Defendants would be carried out.
End Exhibit �D� Douglas G. Reiman v. John Does et all
Civil Action Docket No._____________________.

[Nigel Brooks]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:3mpvb5luf0lp95fji...@4ax.com...

Snip

Not only does the complaint violate the FRCP due to its Serbonian Bog
length (FRCP mandates "a short and plain statement "), there is also good
reason to believe that had this ever actually gotten to the adversarial
stage, it's author would have been subject to the penalties provided for
under Rule 11 of the FRCP, for violation of Rule 11(b).

Nigel Brooks

[Mac]

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:39:07 -0500, "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
wrote:

>Snip
>
>Not only does the complaint violate the FRCP due to its Serbonian Bog
>length (FRCP mandates "a short and plain statement "), there is also good
>reason to believe that had this ever actually gotten to the adversarial
>stage, it's author would have been subject to the penalties provided for
>under Rule 11 of the FRCP, for violation of Rule 11(b).
>Nigel Brooks

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well, I did NOT state whether or not it was "fatuous"...
-Mac, the Medic

[Old Sarge]

Well at least he didn't also claim we called him an asshole.
Most of what I read is bullshit. He will never ever be able to bring anyone
into a court room. This case will hit file 13 if he cannot comply with the
orders of the court, which states he cannot have the court assist him in
obtaining evidence through subpoena until he completes certain actions which
are beyond his control at this time.

In previous postings I mentioned "Reiman" for some reason and I withdraw
that. It was an error on my part. This only pertains to Doug Grant who is
still an asshole.

On 9/27/09 5:27 PM, in article 3mpvb5luf0lp95fji...@4ax.com,
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote:

> deliberately injure laintiff in every manner including but not

[SteveL]

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:27:47 -0700, Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
wrote:

Back in 2005 Doug's now well-known penchant for truly *spectacular*
dishonesty still had some shock value.

After reading a notable example of that I once wrote "You're burying
yourself in lies and obfuscation. You're a tragic figure. I just hope
it doesn't all hit home one day and you eat a gun."

Doug decided (in typical fashion) that this was a "death threat" from
me.

And he's been piping up about it on a semi-regular basis ever since.

It's one thing to babble on insanely in a newsgroup about such things.
That just buys you kook awards.

But to commit this fantasy accusation in writing no less than six
times in a *legal document* to be read by a judge???.

And the "forged FBI document" thrown in about 2 dozen times as well?

it is to larf.

Why is this fucker still a free man?

[Nigel Brooks]

"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:0pSdndKBhp-5QVjX...@giganews.com...

Unfortunately, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for
immediate penalties for making false statements in a pleading.

Under the rules, an individual is free to allege whatever he wishes and make
all manner of false accusations and statements. If it is believed that the
individual has made a willful misrepresentation, they are then given notice
and allowed 21 days in which to correct the matter or withdraw with
absolutely no penalty.

Texas Rep Lamar Smith has introduced a bill in the Congress to correct this
glaring problem and make sanctions mandatory rather than discretionary, and
also eliminate the 21 day get out of jail free card that the FRCP currently
offers people who misuse the federal court system.

I have provided Rep Smith copies of this filing, and also like filings in
order to illustrate the that misuse of the federal courts to harass in this
way is still a problem and needs to be addressed.

People who file things like this need to be brought to task, immediately
sanctioned, and also be adjudicated as vexatious litigants which would then
require that they obtain permission of the court prior to filing any
lawsuit.

Nigel Brooks

[DGVREIMAN]

"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7iaeu7F...@mid.individual.net...

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case. You would think these
pathetic souls would find something to do other than spread their
fraud, hate and smears about people that disagree with them, but alas,
this has become their "pathetic life."

Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
maintain web sites and a Google Newsgroup designed specifically to
defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of
course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals.

I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
any University they select, and if either of those entities agree with
Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.

Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
pants, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts. . . and the reason is obvious - they know they are
lying.

Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.

If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.

My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.

Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, non-fiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.

The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).

And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.

http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.

http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.

Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.

Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*

I said as the following URL clearly proves:

1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.

Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statement about this issue:

"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).

Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?

Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."

When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:

http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009

"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating
> method. The post stands by itself."

Nigel Brooks"

We all know, the WORLD knows, that when Fiction is used in any article
or prose it is NEVER identified as Fiction! Mark Twain even said
that Fiction has to be more believable than non-fiction or it loses
its effectiveness! According to Brainless Brooks, each time an author
uses Fiction to embellish or add interest to a story, he must tell
the reader in that same article he is using Fiction! This claim by BB
is about the most ridiculous, idiotic statement I have ever heard
about the use of Fiction, and it directly contradicts ALL authors,
prose instruction, and journalism 101 in every University in the
World!

So once again we have another Nigel Brooks arrogant first, now he is
claiming he knows more about writing Fiction than Mark Twain and all
Universities in the world!

I cannot decide if Nigel Brooks is arrogantly stupid, or just
arrogant? Or perhaps both? I will leave that decision up to the
readers.

http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.

I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.

When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively non-fiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.

SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!

Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."

These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).

As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.

It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:

"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"

Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?

If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Question:

If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?

Lawyers Speak "again"

All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.

Nigel Brooks -con man, hate gang leader and fraud merchant:

Starting in 2005 Nigel Brooks began waging a smear, libel and
defamation campaign against me. He said that he was "appointing
himself a judge over me" and proceeded to use fraud, false
accusations, outright serial lying, con man jargon and tactics, and
most of all, false light fraud by forging and distorting what he
claims I have said in the past. Nigel Brooks also claimed that he
wrote the US Army and received, via a FOIA request, copies of my
military records. After that con man attempt to add credibility to
his fraud and cons, he then claimed that my military records proved I
had lied about various duties I performed or experienced during my
military career.

It turns out that Nigel Brooks, a former two year-draftee that was
*forced* into the military and achieved the highest rank of Sp4, and
elected to take a Village Rat release from active duty in Vietnam, is
nothing more than a con man smear merchant that hates real Vietnam
Veterans, and has lied so often and so profusely about his military
service that he tries to divert attention to his cons and fraud by
falsely accusing real veterans of lying about their military service.
The only way Nigel Brooks, con man, can bolster his pathetic ego, and
divert attention from his pathetic and "forced" service in the US
Army, is by fraudulently denigrating and defaming real Veterans that
actually served in the regular army and volunteered for duties that
Nigel Brooks apparently hid and cowered from while he was serving in
Vietnam - like I said, he took a Village Rat discharge in Vietnam, and
all Vietnam Vets know what that means.

I have often asked Mr. Brooks to provide, or even name *a single
document* he claims exists in my military records that proves any of
his fraudulent and con man accusations he has posted about me in
respect to my military service. Nigel Brooks hides, runs, cowers and
ducks this challenge - he knows he is lying and conning, and he knows
he has been caught in mid con.

I have also often challenged Nigel Brooks to provide his claims about
me to any independent legal source, such as the American Association
of Arbitrators, or any University Law Department he chooses, and I
will provide same with my rebuttals to his fraud. If any of these
independent sources agree with Brooks that I lied about anything, I
will pay for the legal review, but if they agree that Brooks is using
false accusations, then Brooks pays for the legal review.

Nigel Brooks has cowered, hid, run, ducked, danced around, avoided and
lied about the above STANDING challenge for years. Nigel Brooks knows
that he will be exposed as perhaps the most prolific serial liar and
con man on the Internet if he accepts any of my challenges to get to
the truth.

The con man Nigel Brooks cannot be believed about anything. He uses
selective analysis, and then in true con man style tries to use his
past employment in the US Custom Service to provide credibility to his
cons, as he did the US Army. But in truth the US Custom Service does
not condone nor want anything to do with Nigel Brook's cons and fraud,
and neither does the US Army, and both have stated this fact to me in
no uncertain terms.

Whatever Nigel Brooks posts or says about someone typically cannot be
believed, and his demonizing and smearing those that point out his
perpetual use of fraud, forgeries and fraud is glaring and easily
proved.

End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

This Con Man, smear merchant and serial liar is now pretending to be a
lawyer as well? BWHAHAHAHAHA. Con man Nigel Brooks is claiming that
a complaint containing multiple causes of action must collectively
represent a "short and plain statement" where all the courts in the
land have proclaimed and ruled that EACH cause of action must contain
a short and plain statement, which of course my John Doe lawsuit did.

Other "legal opinions" from Nigel Brooks are akin to the stupidity and
general con man/hate gang jargon we usually see from con man Nigel
Brooks. He knows he cannot back up anything he says, and he ducks
runs, hides and cowers from proof or requests for the same. My legal
advice comes from real lawyers, not con men smear merchants and serial
liars like Nigel Brooks - I suggest you get your legal advice from
your own lawyer and forget the utter child like ravings of con men
like Nigel Brooks.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>

[DGVREIMAN]

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.

However, unlike the gang�s other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang�s obloquy and fraud in each case. You would think these

pathetic souls would find something to do other than spread their
fraud, hate and smears about people that disagree with them, but alas,

this has become their �pathetic life.�

�reasonable person� doctrine and case law) we will then remove this

post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.

My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from

harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a �lawful
and legitimate� publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,

libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.

Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP�s and web

hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.

This means the Brownie crackpots� inevitable accusations and howls

that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which

involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary�s
definition�s of simple terms, such as �we� �estimated� �involved�
�retired from� and �not representing any biographical claim� are all
incorrect, and only their �special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang�s

and otherwise further their years� long demonizing and vilification

campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.

The gang�s lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang� preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is

the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended

context and meaning by the author is somehow �sinister� and the

original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).

And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist

misstatement by one of our typist�s, I have posted about two dozen

times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.

Also, in response to the smear gang�s et al repeated and convenient

outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS� GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang�s glaring lie that I never

mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.

http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a

psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called �Kook�

votes never occur outside of the smear gang.

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks� lies about receiving medals

he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.

http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.

Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang�s fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero� proved the fraud and lie it is: In

fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con

gang�s purpose and mantra.

Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including

his gang�s fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and

false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*

I said as the following URL clearly proves:

1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.

Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statement about this issue:

"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).

Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would

conveniently �forget� Nigel�s conclusion about this issue after I

started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?

Gang Preposterously Claims �Fiction� is �Lying.�

When Brooks read my �shoot around little girl� or �shoot little girl�

post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:

http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009

�I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that

Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.

>>>> Nigel Brooks �

Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:

� he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >

forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating

> method. The post stands by itself.�

Nigel Brooks�

SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED �TROLLS� OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG�S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!

Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks� key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as �Trolls.�

These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected

to Nigel Brooks and his gang�s defamation and smear campaigns).

As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a

�Troll.� Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name

of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.

It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort

to and use criminal acts to further the gang�s smear and vilification
campaigns:

�Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net

From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"

Considering the self-description of these gang members as �Trolls� and

their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)

to defame Nigel Brook�s targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out

there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?

If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Question:

If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?

Lawyers Speak �again�

All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.

Nigel Brooks -con man, hate gang leader and fraud merchant:

Starting in 2005 Nigel Brooks began waging a smear, libel and

defamation campaign against me. He said that he was �appointing
himself a judge over me� and proceeded to use fraud, false

accusations, outright serial lying, con man jargon and tactics, and
most of all, false light fraud by forging and distorting what he
claims I have said in the past. Nigel Brooks also claimed that he
wrote the US Army and received, via a FOIA request, copies of my
military records. After that con man attempt to add credibility to
his fraud and cons, he then claimed that my military records proved I
had lied about various duties I performed or experienced during my
military career.

It turns out that Nigel Brooks, a former two year-draftee that was
*forced* into the military and achieved the highest rank of Sp4, and
elected to take a Village Rat release from active duty in Vietnam, is
nothing more than a con man smear merchant that hates real Vietnam
Veterans, and has lied so often and so profusely about his military
service that he tries to divert attention to his cons and fraud by
falsely accusing real veterans of lying about their military service.
The only way Nigel Brooks, con man, can bolster his pathetic ego, and

divert attention from his pathetic and �forced� service in the US

not condone nor want anything to do with Nigel Brook�s cons and fraud,

and neither does the US Army, and both have stated this fact to me in
no uncertain terms.

Whatever Nigel Brooks posts or says about someone typically cannot be
believed, and his demonizing and smearing those that point out his
perpetual use of fraud, forgeries and fraud is glaring and easily
proved.

End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message

news:7iaov1F...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bbb87dd4-a8fc-43bc...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

>> On Sep 27, 2:39 pm, "Nigel Brooks" <nbro...@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>>> it's author would have been subject to the penalties provided for
>>> under Rule 11 of the FRCP, for violation of Rule 11(b).
>>>
>>> Nigel Brooks
>>

>> Very interesting...
>>
>> FYI: http://tinyurl.com/2vpql
>>
>> III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS > Rule 11. Prev | Next
>> Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers;
>> Representations
>> to the Court; Sanctions
>>
>> Rule 11(b) Representations to the Court.
>>
>> By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other
>> paper
>> � whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it �
>> an
>> attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the
>> person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an
>> inquiry
>> reasonable under the circumstances:
>>
>> (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to
>> harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of
>> litigation;
>>
>> (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted
>> by
>> existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending,
>> modifying,
>> or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;
>>
>> (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if
>> specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support
>> after
>> a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery;
>> and
>>
>> (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the
>> evidence
>> or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief
>> or a
>> lack of information.
>>
>> (c) Sanctions.
>>
>> (1) In General.
>>
>> If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court
>> determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose
>> an
>> appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that
>> violated
>> the rule or is responsible for the violation. Absent exceptional
>> circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible for a
>> violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.
>>
>> ***
>
> The main problem with Rule 11 sanctions is that willful
> misrepresentation such as in this case cannot be punished if the
> individual who made the misrepresentation withdraws the complaint.
> In this case the complaint was dismissed at the request of the
> filer.
>
> Had the complaint not been withdrawn, the filer still has 21 days in
> which to withdraw it or make amendments, once they have been
> notified of the disputed facts.
>
> In 2005, Representative Lamar Smith the Lawsuit Abuse Reduct Act to
> make Rule 11 sanctions mandatory rather than discretionary as they
> are at present, and also eliminate the 21 day safe harbor provision
> which in effect allows an individual to file a totally frivolous
> complaint (such as this) and then withdraw it without fear of
> punishment. That bill never became law, but passed the House by a
> vote of 228 to 184. It was subsequently made part of the Stop Trial
> Lawyer Pork Act of 2008.
>
> I have provided Rep Smith the complete details of this and other
> like filings in order to assist him in getting this legislation
> signed into law.
>
> Nigel Brooks

Doug Says: If con man Brooks has contacted Representative Lamar Smith
about a lawsuit he knows is completely true, and one that con man
Nigel Brooks knows he cannot refute because it is true, then I suspect
that con man Brooks is conning the readers once again. He has not
contacted anyone about my past John Doe lawsuit, and if he has then I
assume he is ready to point out which provisions of that lawsuit he
claims are untrue? I cannot find anything untrue about it? In fact,
we have reviewed this lawsuit and have added even more causes of
action.

Moreover, in true con man style, con man Nigel Brooks claims the John
Doe lawsuit was temporarily withdrawn due to fear of punishment?
Duhhhhh. Now con man Brooks has been caught lying about yet *another*
Federal Judge! In truth the Federal Judge granted my motion to file
this lawsuit at a later date - no punishment -no threat of
punishment -nothing of the kind was ever mentioned by any Judge in my
respect in respect to anything. Brooks is lying.

Once again we find Nigel Brooks caught in mid con and fraud. If
Brooks disagrees he can post his communication to Rep Smith so I can
follow-up with a letter to Rep Smith providing him the facts about
this issue. (Watch Nigel Brooks run and hide).

Doug Grant (Tm
>

[DGVREIMAN]

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.

However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case. You would think these

pathetic souls would find something to do other than spread their
fraud, hate and smears about people that disagree with them, but alas,

this has become their "pathetic life."

"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this

post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.

My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from

harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,

libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.

Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web

hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.

This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls

that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which

involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"

"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's

and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification

campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.

The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is

the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended

context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the

original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).

And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist

misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen

times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.

Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient

outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never

mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.

http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a

psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"

votes never occur outside of the smear gang.

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals

he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.

http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.

Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In

fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con

gang's purpose and mantra.

Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including

his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and

false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*

I said as the following URL clearly proves:

1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.

Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statement about this issue:

"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).

Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would

conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I

started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?

Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."

When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"

post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:

http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009

"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that

Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that

of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating
> method. The post stands by itself."

Nigel Brooks"

SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!

Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."

These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected

to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).

As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a

"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name

of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.

It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort

to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:

"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"

Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and

their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)

to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out

there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?

If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Question:

If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?

Lawyers Speak "again"

All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.

Nigel Brooks -con man, hate gang leader and fraud merchant:

Starting in 2005 Nigel Brooks began waging a smear, libel and

defamation campaign against me. He said that he was "appointing
himself a judge over me" and proceeded to use fraud, false

accusations, outright serial lying, con man jargon and tactics, and
most of all, false light fraud by forging and distorting what he
claims I have said in the past. Nigel Brooks also claimed that he
wrote the US Army and received, via a FOIA request, copies of my
military records. After that con man attempt to add credibility to
his fraud and cons, he then claimed that my military records proved I
had lied about various duties I performed or experienced during my
military career.

It turns out that Nigel Brooks, a former two year-draftee that was
*forced* into the military and achieved the highest rank of Sp4, and
elected to take a Village Rat release from active duty in Vietnam, is
nothing more than a con man smear merchant that hates real Vietnam
Veterans, and has lied so often and so profusely about his military
service that he tries to divert attention to his cons and fraud by
falsely accusing real veterans of lying about their military service.
The only way Nigel Brooks, con man, can bolster his pathetic ego, and

divert attention from his pathetic and "forced" service in the US

not condone nor want anything to do with Nigel Brook's cons and fraud,

and neither does the US Army, and both have stated this fact to me in
no uncertain terms.

Whatever Nigel Brooks posts or says about someone typically cannot be
believed, and his demonizing and smearing those that point out his
perpetual use of fraud, forgeries and fraud is glaring and easily
proved.

End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message

news:7imhdnF...@mid.individual.net...

>
>
> "SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:0pSdndKBhp-5QVjX...@giganews.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:27:47 -0700, Mac
>> <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Back in 2005 Doug's now well-known penchant for truly *spectacular*
>> dishonesty still had some shock value.
>>
>> After reading a notable example of that I once wrote "You're
>> burying
>> yourself in lies and obfuscation. You're a tragic figure. I just
>> hope
>> it doesn't all hit home one day and you eat a gun."
>>
>> Doug decided (in typical fashion) that this was a "death threat"
>> from
>> me.

Doug Says: You confirmed it was a death threat in subsequent posts.

>>
>> And he's been piping up about it on a semi-regular basis ever
>> since.

>>
>> It's one thing to babble on insanely in a newsgroup about such
>> things.
>> That just buys you kook awards.
>>
>> But to commit this fantasy accusation in writing no less than six
>> times in a *legal document* to be read by a judge???.
>>
>> And the "forged FBI document" thrown in about 2 dozen times as
>> well?
>>
>> it is to larf.
>>
>> Why is this fucker still a free man?

Doug Says: Mr. Stevel L (who denies he is really Steve Leyand) are
you claiming you did not forge FBI documents like the dozens of posts
I have provided my lawyers prove? You cannot duck, hide and dodge
from these acts, they are a matter of third party record.

>
> Unfortunately, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide
> for immediate penalties for making false statements in a pleading.

Doug Says: Con man Brooks is not libeling me by claiming that I made
false statements in my John Doe lawsuit. So here is my simple
challenge; please provide which statements you are referring Mr.
Brooks, and your proof they are false, and I will submit my proof they
are NOT false to any University legal department you choose. If that
legal department agrees I made any false statements, I will pay for
the study, if they agree that I DID NOT make any false statements,
then you pay.

Now watch Nigel Brooks run and hide back into his sewer. He knows
every statement was true, and if used in the forthcoming litigation,
will be proved.

Con men like Nigel Brooks that claims something is false, or true,
without EVER providing any evidence is known as, well, a con man. His
claims are child like, false and represent nothing more than con man
BS from Nigel Brooks. Now if he wants to step up with some proof all
of my claims were false, then I cannot wait.

Watch Nigel Brooks run and hide again.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>

[Mac]

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:40:37 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

> I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
>members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
>the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
>any University they select, and if either of those entities agree with
>Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
>their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
>rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
>smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.

*************************************
You have, over the years, threatened those who challenge you with
lawsuits.
Put up, or shut up.
Given your antics, given your threats, it should be a simple matter to
see if you have the courage of your convictions.
You have castigated those challenging you.
You have consistently threatened alleged attorneys and alleged
lawsuits.
You have been told that your "arbitration", given your antics and
threats is NOT sufficient.
Proceed with your threat of a lawsuit that the matter might be settled
by a Judge, a jury.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:40:37 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>Smear Merchant Disclaimer
>
>I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
>made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.

=============================

PARTIES TO THIS COMPLAINT

otherwise attempted to sell or sold products or services on the
Defendants�

harassing and libelous publications about Plaintiff were coming from
an agent of

pursuant to Defendants� policy of suppressing criticism of their fraud
and false

Douglas G. Reiman v. John Does et al Civil Action Docket
No.________________.
Douglas G. Reiman
v.

embellishments, ambiguities, outright fiction, grammar errors, figures
of speech

(6.9). It eventually became clear to Plaintiff that Defendants did not
want

criminal, a murderer, a killer of unarmed priests, personally killed
1803 enemy

titled Causes of Action contained in the attached complaint of Douglas
G.

Douglas G. Reiman
v.
John Does, et al.

Douglas G. Reiman
v.

Douglas G. Reiman

v. John Does, et al.
Civil Action Docket No._________________.

Douglas G. REIMAN v. John Does et al.
EXHIBIT �D� PAST CASINO LAWSUIT
CONNECTION TO NEW COMPLAINT

Douglas G. Reiman
v.

[Mac]

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:48:42 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>Smear Merchant Disclaimer
>
>I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
>made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.

=============================

PARTIES TO THIS COMPLAINT

otherwise attempted to sell or sold products or services on the
Defendants�

harassing and libelous publications about Plaintiff were coming from
an agent of

pursuant to Defendants� policy of suppressing criticism of their fraud
and false

Douglas G. Reiman v. John Does et al Civil Action Docket
No.________________.
Douglas G. Reiman
v.

embellishments, ambiguities, outright fiction, grammar errors, figures
of speech

(6.9). It eventually became clear to Plaintiff that Defendants did not
want

criminal, a murderer, a killer of unarmed priests, personally killed
1803 enemy

titled Causes of Action contained in the attached complaint of Douglas
G.

Douglas G. Reiman
v.
John Does, et al.

Douglas G. Reiman
v.

Douglas G. Reiman

v. John Does, et al.
Civil Action Docket No._________________.

Douglas G. REIMAN v. John Does et al.
EXHIBIT �D� PAST CASINO LAWSUIT
CONNECTION TO NEW COMPLAINT

Douglas G. Reiman
v.

[Mac]

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:03:59 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>Smear Merchant Disclaimer

=============================

PARTIES TO THIS COMPLAINT

otherwise attempted to sell or sold products or services on the
Defendants�

harassing and libelous publications about Plaintiff were coming from
an agent of

pursuant to Defendants� policy of suppressing criticism of their fraud
and false

embellishments, ambiguities, outright fiction, grammar errors, figures
of speech

(6.9). It eventually became clear to Plaintiff that Defendants did not
want

criminal, a murderer, a killer of unarmed priests, personally killed
1803 enemy

[SteveL]

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:03:59 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>
>>
>> "SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:0pSdndKBhp-5QVjX...@giganews.com...
>>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:27:47 -0700, Mac
>>> <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Back in 2005 Doug's now well-known penchant for truly *spectacular*
>>> dishonesty still had some shock value.
>>>
>>> After reading a notable example of that I once wrote "You're
>>> burying
>>> yourself in lies and obfuscation. You're a tragic figure. I just
>>> hope
>>> it doesn't all hit home one day and you eat a gun."
>>>
>>> Doug decided (in typical fashion) that this was a "death threat"
>>> from
>>> me.
>
>Doug Says: You confirmed it was a death threat in subsequent posts.

Which one or ones?

FOAD.

>>>
>>> And he's been piping up about it on a semi-regular basis ever
>>> since.
>
>>>
>>> It's one thing to babble on insanely in a newsgroup about such
>>> things.
>>> That just buys you kook awards.
>>>
>>> But to commit this fantasy accusation in writing no less than six
>>> times in a *legal document* to be read by a judge???.
>>>
>>> And the "forged FBI document" thrown in about 2 dozen times as
>>> well?
>>>
>>> it is to larf.
>>>
>>> Why is this fucker still a free man?
>
>Doug Says: Mr. Stevel L (who denies he is really Steve Leyand) are
>you claiming you did not forge FBI documents like the dozens of posts
>I have provided my lawyers prove?

What's your lawyers name(s)?

I'd like to send them this:

*****************************************************

Path:
supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!portc03.blue.aol.com!audrey05.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 233
X-Admin: n...@aol.com
From: rustybl...@aol.comBATSPAM (Rusty Martin)
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.blackjack
Date: 10 Apr 2001 16:26:03 GMT
References:
<hNRz6.14333$rk4.1...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Doogie and the FBI (Was: Cyberstalking ..more)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <20010410122603...@ng-fc1.aol.com>

In article
<hNRz6.14333$rk4.1043...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> the
Doogie-monster, Doug Grant wrote:

>Moreover, I have already spoken with the FBI, they
>are telling me things very different from what you are claiming.

Due to a successful FOIA request, I was able to secure a transcript of
this conversation. I present below the official transcript of
Doogie's conversation with the FBI:

FBI: "Good afternoon, FBI Seattle, Special Agent Johnson speaking,
no, the other one"

Doogie: "Hello, my name is Doug Grant, and I want to discuss with you
a case of cyberstalking"

FBI: "Okay, Doug Grant, G-R-A-N-T"

Doogie: "Well, actually my name is Doug Reiman."

FBI: "Oh, I see. Reiman. R-E-I-M-A-N"

Doogie: "But I use the name Doug Grant"

FBI: "Okay Mr. Grant"

Doogie: "But you have to use 'TM' after my name, because it's a
trademarked name"

FBI: "So you're saying you want me to call you Mr. Grant-tm?"

Doogie: "You don't have to call me that, you should just make a note
of it next to my name."

FBI: "Grant-tm. Got it. How may your government be of service to
you today?"

Doogie: "I would like to you investigate, arrest and prosecute a
whole bunch of people who are cyberstalking me."

FBI: "I see Mr. Grant-tm, how are these people cyberstalking you?"

Doogie: "Well first off, they sent me kiddie porn. Well, actually,
they sent me an e-mail that said 'Hot young teen babes - CLICK HERE!!'

FBI: "And you consider this cyberstalking, Mr. Grant-tm? Actually,
this is getting a little tedious, I think I'll just call you Mr. TM.
And you believe it is cyberstalking?"

Doogie: "Of course it is!! Haven't you read the statutes I've posted
at least a thousand times regarding cyberstalking?"

FBI: "Posted? What have you posted, and to where?"

Doogie: "I've posted it to rec.gambling.blackjack. It's the place
where all the con men and the hucksters prey on innocent people,
perpetrating egregious frauds on unsuspecting newbies."

FBI: "Con men and hucksters?"

Doogie: "Yes, I've already proved this in court you moron. There are
thousands and thousands of con men hucksters and they're all
cyberstalking me on rec.gambling.blackjack. But I already proved this
beyond a shadow of a doubt in court."

FBI: "Well Mr. TM, if you've already proved it in court, why do you
need the FBI to be involved?"

Doogie: "That's part of the conspiracy you moron!! The con men
hucksters managed to arrange through nefarious means (this is part of
what I need you to investigate) for the Federal Judge (who no doubt is
in on the conspiracy) to throw out my complaint! Then, in an
incredible shake of pure hucksterism the 3 Judges on the Federal
Appeals court PROVED that they are part of the same conspiracy!! They
dismissed my claims! And everyone involved is cyberstalking me!!!"

FBI: So let me get this straight, you say you're being cyberstalked
by a massive conspiracy that includes thousands and thousands of con
men and hucksters and 4 Federal Judges. Ahem. I see Mr. TM, and
aside from this text-only kiddie porn that they've sent to you, have
they threatened you in any way?"

Doogie: "Of course they have! One guy was claiming that I didn't
have a registered trademark, and posted that my status was DEAD! That
was clearly a veiled death threat."

FBI: Your status is dead?

Doogie: No you idiot! The status of my trademark is dead! Not me!
That's why it was clearly a death threat!

FBI: "Mr. TM, your trademark is dead? Then why are you insisting I
call you Mr. TM Mr. Grant?"

Doogie: "You will recognize my trademark, because I claim common law
trademark rights! Don't you know anything you blithering fool!?"

FBI: "Yes Mr. Grant no-tm, please continue about the death threats."

Doogie: "Another group of people all threatened to put me in their
kill files! Clearly, they intend to cause me harm."

FBI: "Killfile you?"

Doogie: "Yes. This is clearly a threat from the con men hucksters."

FBI: "Don't forget the Federal Judges."

Doogie: "I haven't even gotten to the best part yet."

FBI: "And that is?"

Doogie: "All of these con men and hucksters are really the same
person."

FBI: "They are?"

Doogie: "Yes, his name is Bingo Billy Rusty BillyRubin Abdul Solinas
Mizz Tie"

FBI: "That's one hell of a name."

Doogie: "Yes, they are using dozens and dozens of AOL accounts to
stalk me. Believe me, I know how it works. I once created 150 AOL
accounts in order to defeat one of their nefarious plans."

FBI: "You defeated their nefarious plans by creating 150 AOL
accounts?"

Doogie: "Well, no, I didn't actually defeat them. The USENET
Volunteer Votetaker turned out to be another member of the conspiracy,
and she through out all of my fake votes as frauds!!"

FBI: "So these people are all one person posting from AOL accounts."

Doogie: "Oh no, it's much worse than that. They have a magical way
of making their posts look like they're not coming from AOL. They use
aol, home.com, web-tv, paxentertainment and hundreds of other
providers. But THEY'RE REALLY ONLY ONE GUY POSTING FROM AOL!!!!"

"IT'S CLEARLY A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY!!! ALL DESIGNED TO CYBERSTALK
ME!!!!"

FBI: "Clearly, eh? Okay."

Doogie: "The most sinister part of it all involves Mizz Tie."

FBI: "Mizz Tie?"

Doogie: "Yes. You see, she claims to work for a casino. But it's
obvious that all of the con men hucksters are liars, so she obviously
doesn't work for a casino."

FBI: "And this is sinister….how?"

Doogie: "Because it's all part of the conspiracy! You see, because
she is a con man huckster and a liar, it's obvious that she's SECRETLY
WORKING FOR THE CASINOS!!!!"

FBI: "I thought you said that she SAID she worked for a casino."

Doogie: "I did! Don't you see now how deep and sinister this plot
really is?"

FBI: "I see Mr. no-tm. And do you feel as though you're in any
danger?"

Doogie: "No, I'm not in any danger. I was in Vietnam as a Navy Seal.
I've killed many many times. I am not afraid of those con men
hucksters."

FBI: "You were a Navy Seal?"

Doogie: "Well, no. I was actually a seamstress. I stitched ID seals
and insignia on to uniforms for the Navy. It was a killer job, that's
what I meant."

FBI: "So let's see if I got this straight. You are being
cyberstalked by one guy on AOL who posts under thousands of aliases
and 4 Federal Judges, who sent you spam e-mail, told you your
trademark status was dead and they threatened to killfile you. You
don't feel threatened by any of this and you believe that this
qualifies as cyberstalking."

Doogie: "Of course you moron! I've posted the cyberstalking statutes
a thousand times. This is clearly proof!"

FBI: "Yes Mr. Grant. Anything else?"

Doogie: "Yes. They called me a maroon."

FBI: "A maroon?"

Doogie: "Yes, they say: 'What a maroon' whenever I post"

FBI: "Oh, I get it!! Like Bugs Bunny! "What a maroon!"

Doogie: "No you blithering fool!! It's racist!! They are using
racist slurs
to intimidate me!!"

FBI: "Oh, Mr. Grant. I didn't realize you were black"

Doogie: "I'M NOT BLACK, YOU IDIOT!!! This is all part of the
cyberstalking! They use racist slurs against me to stalk me and
threaten me!!"

FBI: "Well Mr. Maroon, uh, Grant, eh Reiman. I have no doubt that
you are
being cyberstalked, and we'll get to the bottom of it right away.

"How can we reach you?"

Doogie: "Well, I live in the State of Washington now, but I don't
actually live in the State of Washington, I live in Las Vegas, Nevada.
But you can reach me at my Washington phone number which forwards to
my home in Las Vegas where I have hundreds of supporters who answer
the phone and say it's me."

FBI: "Yes Mr. Grant no-tm, we'll get on this right away"

Doogie: "The cyberstalking must end!!!"

FBI: "Yes, Mr. Grant."

[ sound of telephone hanging up ]

FBI: "What a maroon."

**************************************************************

Copyright 2001 - Rusty Martin
Freely distributable throughout the internet so long as attribution is
given.

Rusty Martin

"Indeed, we are satisfied that the appellants have mischaracterized
the facts." "...the reshuffle is hardly secret as the dealer does it
openly in the view of the players."--3rd Circuit Court of Appeals,
Justice Greenberg [Well duh! Doug]

Google Home - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs, Press, & Help

�2005 Google

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:aq30c5l33v2t2655o...@4ax.com...

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:

Cease and desist such defaming and false statements about me at once
and apologize or face legal action.

Doug Says: The complaint does not violate the FRCP due to its length.
That statement is pure fraud. The Judge never made any such ruling,
and if the complaint did violate the FRCP length rule it would have
been thrown out by the Judge almost immediately. Lying about what a
Federal Judge ruled in this case is typical Nigel Brooks.

Further, the rules involving length involve each cause of action and
NOT the number of causes of actions! I find it amazing that anyone
would believe Nigel Brooks glaring fraud after he fraudulently
published volumes of fraud about what a different Federal Judge said
about me in the past - echoed of course by Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell as
we see here.

Cease and desist Mr. McDonnell and apologize.

Doug Reiman

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:vktfd5dgknsaokf7b...@4ax.com...

Rebuttal: Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:

The offer of an independent arbitration to determine the facts was
clearly a process that would avoid a court action. Considering it was
loser pays, it is amazing that Nigel Brooks would hide and run from
that challenge. However, your demand for me to file a lawsuit before
you will stop your false accusations and harassment is confirmed.

If you have a lawyer please provide the name and contact number and I
will have my lawyers contact her, him, whatever. You lied when you
said your lawyer sent me a cease and desist notice prior to you filing
false and abusive false charges against me, so I must assume you are
lying again. I do not believe you have a lawyer. There is no lawyer
in the world that would condone your false accusations, libel and and
harassment.

You are hereby advised to cease and desist your harassment and false
accusations about me immediately, and apologize, or face further legal
action.

Douglas Reiman