On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:02:04 -0400, Ed Pawlowski <
e...@snet.net> wrote:
>On 8/5/2015 6:41 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:00:42 -0500, "Emma D." <
em...@invalid.net>
>> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>> I'm getting frustrated trying to figure out how to get a car that
>>> doesn't have something wrong with it, and the reviews I read were on the
>>> new Fiat500L's.
>>>
>>> Any advice? thanks!
>>
>> If you loved it that's all that matters. There is no significant
>> difference between the 'quality" of cars today. They are all
>> excellent despite the misleading "quality" ratings you get from places
>> like JD Power. That said, the Fiat is on the low end of the excellent
>> scale. Instead of it having 1.5 problems in it's first year it may
>> have 3, all which will be fixed under warranty for free.
>
>Difficult to do a real comparison. Fiat is ranked dead last in every
>reliability survey so it is not something I'd want to buy.
>
>It is better than any car built in the 1950s though I think that is how
>you arrive at your conclusion about being on the low end of excellent.
I don't recall the exact numbers but the spread of the Jd powers
"quality" ratings is something like 70 to 230. Sounds like a big
spread. But it's per hundred cars. So for the ONE car YOU will buy
the difference in "quality" between them is the difference of having
perhaps only 0.7 problems in the first year versus having maybe 2.3
problems in the first year. And the "problems" being compared could
be anything from the engine blew up to "I don't like the way the radio
knob feels and the dealer can't fix it". The JD power numbers are
nearly worthless for retail buyers. If, OTOH, lots of Fiat owners are
actually finding that the engines are blowing up, that's a different
story.
>My father bought a 1959 Chevy and it had a list of over 20 items for the
>dealer to correct.
I wouldn't doubt it. Between 1972 and up till a few years ago I drove
a lot of gvt fleet cars. There was a major change right around the
late 70s where things went from me having a list of things for the
shop to fix every time I sent a car in for it's scheduled service to
the cars almost never needing anything fixed. It was pretty much
across teh board, didn't much matter what make they were buying, GM,
MoPar, AMC, Ford. By 1980 the old "here's a list of things to have
the shop fix" was a thing of the past. And most of the stuff that did
go wrong was really pretty minor, a lock motor would go bad or
something like that OR rarely a major issue fixed for free like
transmissions in Dodge Diesel 4x4s that couldn't take the torque of
the engine. And that kind of stuff isn't going to show up in the JD
Powers numbers that get all the airplay.
I'd say look at consumers reports info but it's often crap too but at
least it tracks things for real life cars for several years.
Unfortunately it suffers the same deficiency, now that everythihg is
really quite good stuff that's on the lower end of "quite good" winds
up with a black dot as if it's junk. Some of the cars CU rates are
good are crap to actually live with and drive whereas some of the
"bad" ones are quite nice to live with and drive.
I guess there's no perfect system.