Worthless
Garrett C Cress
This is the first time I have ventured into this group and I can already see that
all of you are fuckin imbeciles. You don't even discuss anything of value.
Whadda ya do, just wait for an article like this one, then sit around with one
thumb up your loose ass while you type away with the other hand? You idiots
must harbor a tremendous amount of hate at the world, maybe cause your dad
wouldn't let you have a turn with your sister the last time you visited home.
the gmeister
get used to it
Keith M. Ryan
Suitable title for Gar's post: worthless.
Rob Dobson
> the gmeister
> get used to it
what, you mean get used to another borng loser with a dumb nickname?
or get used to another asshole with ksu.ksu.edu as your site?
perhaps you and that other snot-nosed kansan tilden can be bigger assholes
than Bruce and Ken, tag-team assholes from penn state
Garrett C Cress
Ooooooohhhhh, goodness Rob, you sure embarrassed me.
You just put my adress right out there so everyone can see it.
You probably thought you were pretty damn keen being able to hunt out
my name and then type it in.
Of course this probably WAS an accomplishment since you were wanking off
with a baseball lodged in your ass. In fact, that's must have been how you got
the idea that I "masturbates then ejaculates".
As far as the nickname, I'm gonna keep using it just to piss you off.
The the phrase after it will be used as in "`get used to it` rob when I make
you wanna crawl back into the dwarfs ass you came out of."
Get it.
I also noticed that you didn't deny the fact that you are inbred.
Of course we all would've known since live in the hillbilly state of Virginia.
the gmeister
get used to it (Rob)
Kenneth J Robinson
>
>This is the first time I have ventured into this group and I can already see
>that all of you are fuckin imbeciles.
Quite the contrary, Mr. Cress. I am K e n and K e n is not an imbecile,
for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be K e n. You should read the
group for awhile to determine exactly who are imbeciles, which in most
cases will be misinformed individuals.
>You don't even discuss anything of value.
K e n discusses everything which is of value. You seem to be misinformed.
What would you care to discuss?
>Whadda ya do, just wait for an article like this one, then sit around with one
>thumb up your loose ass while you type away with the other hand?
Quite the contrary, Mr. Cress. The insertion of appendages into the
anus serves no purpose, thus K e n does not understand why one would
initiate such an activity. K e n requires both hands when typing, for
it is most efficient. The more appendages that are applied to the keyboard,
the more characters that can be typed.
>You idiots
>must harbor a tremendous amount of hate at the world, maybe cause your dad
>wouldn't let you have a turn with your sister the last time you visited home.
K e n does not hate the world. K e n is on a mission to inform the world
of its misinformed ways. Once the world becomes informed and learns the
most basic, standard hygiene procedures, only then will hatred cease.
Further, K e n does not have a sister, thus you are misinformed. And
precisely what activity are we supposed to be having with our "sister"
when it is our turn?? You did not mention any activities. Please
post the activity, thus K e n will understand your request.
K e n R o b i n s o n
PostMistress General
>
>The more appendages that are applied to the keyboard,
>the more characters that can be typed.
>
Does this mean that K e n uses his penis as well as his hands when he types?
--liz
--
my ego ate my .sig[deleted]
Kenneth J Robinson
K e n is not the member of a tag team. K e n acts on K e n's will
only. K e n does not require teammates, for K e n can defend himself.
You, sir, are quite misinformed.
Kenneth J Robinson
>In article <By4LA...@cs.psu.edu> krob...@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu
>(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>The more appendages that are applied to the keyboard,
>>the more characters that can be typed.
>>
>
>Does this mean that K e n uses his penis as well as his hands when he types?
No, K e n only uses fingers for such activities. K e n uses K e n's
penis for other activities, which is not a topic of discussion. A penis
was not designed for typing. It's main purpose is copulation. The arousal
of the penis to various forms of stimulation allows it to succeed at this
purpose. Please inform yourself of this.
Par Svensson
:
: No, K e n only uses fingers for such activities. K e n uses K e n's
: penis for other activities, which is not a topic of discussion. A penis
: was not designed for typing. It's main purpose is copulation. The arousal
Come on, K e n, what other activities, beside ITS main purpose - copulating -
are you referring to. I'm impressed, though, that you copulate more often
than you take a piss, and still have time to tell people about it on the net.
/Par
[...I know karate, voodoo too...]
Kenneth J Robinson
K e n says that this is not a topic for discussion, thus K e n will
not discuss it. This is a family-oriented newsgroup.
Garrett C Cress
Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
the gmeister
Kevin Walsh
shoulders. This is not a family-orientated newsgroup Ken. If this
were a family-orientated newsgroup, I wouldn't be able to tell
you to FUCK OFF!
So FUCK OFF YOU WANKER!
--
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ k...@dsbc.icl.co.uk
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
Kenneth J Robinson
K e n is not a "compulsive wanker." K e n is K e n, and K e n uses
his genitals for much more extraordinary things. K e n is never
embarrassed.
Kenneth J Robinson
>In article <1escrn...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu> cr...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress) writes:
>>
>> In article <By6xH...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>> >In article <1992Nov23.1...@tdb.uu.se> t89...@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>> >>Kenneth J Robinson (krob...@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu) wrote:
>> >>:
>> >>: No, K e n only uses fingers for such activities. K e n uses K e n's
>> >>: penis for other activities, which is not a topic of discussion. A penis
>> >>: was not designed for typing. It's main purpose is copulation. The arousal
>> >>:
>> >>Come on, K e n, what other activities, beside ITS main purpose - copulating -
>> >>are you referring to. I'm impressed, though, that you copulate more often
>> >>than you take a piss, and still have time to tell people about it on the net.
>> >
>> >K e n says that this is not a topic for discussion, thus K e n will
>> >not discuss it. This is a family-oriented newsgroup.
>> >
>> >K e n R o b i n s o n
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
>> Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
>> reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
>>
>> the gmeister
>>
>Or maybe he can't use his penis for typing because it is on his
>shoulders. This is not a family-orientated newsgroup Ken. If this
>were a family-orientated newsgroup, I wouldn't be able to tell
>you to FUCK OFF!
You should control your behavior, son. Children shouldn't be posting
in this group. K e n suggests that you find your parents, tell them
what you did, and then request them to initiate washing procedures
for your largest facial orifice with a bar of soap.
>So FUCK OFF YOU WANKER!
>
>--
> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
> _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h
> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ k...@dsbc.icl.co.uk
>_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
Figure 1: The signature of a child and his most intelligent form of
communication.
Elizabeth Cyr Jones
...
>were a family-orientated newsgroup, I wouldn't be able to tell
>you to FUCK OFF!
>
>So FUCK OFF YOU WANKER!
>
>--
> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
> _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h
> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ k...@dsbc.icl.co.uk
>_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
.
.
I feel compelled to point out that "orientated" is not a word.
I believe the word you're looking for is, "oriented". It would
seem that "to orientate" would be perfectly viable, considering
we do have "orientation", but, alas no.
.
Otherwise, keep up the good work, and your intellectually
stimulating posts!
liz jones
Garrett C Cress
>>Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
>>Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
>>reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
>
>K e n is not a "compulsive wanker." K e n is K e n, and K e n uses
>his genitals for much more extraordinary things. K e n is never
>embarrassed.
>
>K e n R o b i n s o n
=================================================================================
Oooooh Lordie, this is getting more interesting (and more sickening) every
time K e n tries to respond. K e n says he is not a compulsive wanker, but he
DOES do "more extraordinary things" with and for his genitals. This of course
suggests he uses toys, furniture, kitchen appliances and large, grazing farm
animals. I think the best thing for K e n to do is to just quit posting and
devote all his spare time to satisfying sheep.
the gmeister
JAGDEEP SAHNI
You got that right, K E N. If you knew what being embarrased is, you
would have taken your sorry ass out of alt.flame a long time ago. Here is a
clue. You have been embarrased several times in alt.flame. You have been
informed. So initiate standard washing procedures on yourself or whatever it is
you do. Or show your prowess to Rob's dog, as you claim to use your genitals
for 'much more extraordinary things'. And one last thing, get the fuck out of
alt.flame.
Jagdeep
Kevin Walsh
on in life - or get better at looking through the one you have.
Christ on a slab, I bet WANKER isn't even listed in your nursery edition.
Jason Basinger Linkins
>
>Ooooooohhhhh, goodness Rob, you sure embarrassed me.
>You just put my adress right out there so everyone can see it.
>
>Of course we all would've known since live in the hillbilly state of Virginia.
To call the state of Virginia a "hillbilly" state is one of the more
ignorant things you can do. Virginia has educational resources that are
on par with the states of New York, California, and Michigan. The College
of William and Mary and The University of Virginia are two of the finest
collegiate institutions in the country. Business is booming in metropolitan
Northern Virginia, a mere twenty minutes from the nation's capital, and
NoVa is considered to have one of the highest qualities of life in the
country. Tourism is steady all year round, with beach fans flocking to
Va Beach, skiers to Massanutten, outdoor fanatics traipsing through
the Blue Ridge Mountains or the Appalachian Trail, and history buffs
heading to Williamsburg or Yorktown. Truly, your conception of the
Commonwealth of Virginia is plaily misguided.
Our only gaping fault is that we went Bush in the last elections, but
nobody's perfect
.
Par Svensson
:
: Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
: Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
: reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
K e n is a compulsive wanker, because K e n is K e n.
/Par
Par Svensson
: In article <By8Hp...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes...
: >In article <1escrn...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu> cr...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress) writes:
: >>
: >>In article <By6xH...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
: >>>In article <1992Nov23.1...@tdb.uu.se> t89...@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
: >>>>Kenneth J Robinson (krob...@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu) wrote:
: >>>>:
:
: Jagdeep
Imagine what somebody like Jagdeep would be able to say, if he couldn't
include four previous postings in his. Wouldn't leave much...
/Par
Scott Schelter u
>ignorant things you can do. Virginia has educational resources that are
>on par with the states of New York, California, and Michigan. The College
>of William and Mary and The University of Virginia are two of the finest
>collegiate institutions in the country. Business is booming in metropolitan
>Northern Virginia, a mere twenty minutes from the nation's capital, and
>NoVa is considered to have one of the highest qualities of life in the
>country. Tourism is steady all year round, with beach fans flocking to
>Va Beach, skiers to Massanutten, outdoor fanatics traipsing through
>the Blue Ridge Mountains or the Appalachian Trail, and history buffs
>heading to Williamsburg or Yorktown. Truly, your conception of the
>Commonwealth of Virginia is plaily misguided.
Skiing?!? Virginia!?!
No way in hell can you tell me that tourism to your pansy ski
resort is popular. What the fuck is a Massanutten, anyway?
Le DOG
JAGDEEP SAHNI
Good Query, Very-Much-Below-Par Svensson. NOT!!! Especially since you
conveniently deleted the rest of my posting. It was necessary to include the
previous postings in order to get across to dimwits like K E N and your
pathetic self. If reading puts too much strain on your miniscule intellect,
please take the advice I gave K E N and save yourself the misery. And don't
bother to thank me, you might get a stroke or something doing so.
>/Par
I really hope that the slash was a typo. If not, try the net.nickname
I suggested. Please,
Jagdeep
James Paul Walawender
In article <Byqyz...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>wanker, for K e n is K e n.
>
>K e n R o b i n s o n
Ken wanks because he is Ken...Therefore he wanks to be Ken and that is why
he is Ken.
Ken here is a tip: Do not wank while you type because your hitting
the space bar while you type your name.
Mepro "Greed causes corruption"
Kenneth J Robinson
Incorrect logic, sir. K e n is K e n and K e n cannot be a compulsive
wanker, for K e n is K e n.
Kenneth J Robinson
K e n has received no advice from you. The only thing K e n has
seen of your posts is that they are filled with vast amounts of
misinformation. One cannot take advice from one who is misinformed,
for it would be illogical.
vsg...@acad.drake.edu
> wanker, for K e n is K e n.
>
> K e n R o b i n s o n
great. K e n's back. joy. Hopefully K e n you have thought of a new 'tactic' to
annoy us.
--The Phantom
JAGDEEP SAHNI
You would not know advice if it struck you across your face.
I am a science fiction fan to an extent but your boring android routine
makes me sick. Oh, you want logic. Logic dictates that the needs of the
many outweigh the needs of the few. Get the message? * Sigh * No? Okay,
S P A R E U S Y O U R D R I V E L A N D G E T O U T O F A.F.
Kenneth J Robinson
>
>In article <Byqyz...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov24....@tdb.uu.se> t89...@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>>>Garrett C Cress (cr...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu) wrote:
>>>:
>>>: Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
>>>: Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
>>>: reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
>>>:
>>>K e n is a compulsive wanker, because K e n is K e n.
>>
>>Incorrect logic, sir. K e n is K e n and K e n cannot be a compulsive
>>wanker, for K e n is K e n.
>
>he is Ken.
No, K e n does not wank. This verb cannot be created from the simple
statement: K e n is K e n. Your processors seem to be faulty. Time
for much needed repair.
>Ken here is a tip: Do not wank while you type because your hitting
>the space bar while you type your name.
Your tip is irrelevant, thus it has been discarded and flushed
down the toilet.
Kenneth J Robinson
K e n doesn't require new tactics, for the present ones are working
within expected parameters.
Kenneth J Robinson
K e n does not take orders from you, sir. K e n suggests that you
seek a mental counselor that will deflate your oversized ego. K e n
sees no logic to your posts. They are highly misinformed.
Tilden-Master of Illogic
You mean to tell us suicide by boredom is your tactic. If that's the case,
keep up the good work. And I also found your posts in alt.humor to be
useless, they want jokes in there, not a joke like you.
Tilden
Tilden-Master of Illogic
In article <Byws9...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <1foacv...@phazer.ksu.ksu.edu> me...@phazer.ksu.ksu.edu (James Paul Walawender) writes:
>>
>>In article <Byqyz...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>In article <1992Nov24....@tdb.uu.se> t89...@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>>>>Garrett C Cress (cr...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu) wrote:
>>>>:
>>>>: Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
>>>>: Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
>>>>: reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
>>>>:
>>>>K e n is a compulsive wanker, because K e n is K e n.
>>>
>>>Incorrect logic, sir. K e n is K e n and K e n cannot be a compulsive
>>>wanker, for K e n is K e n.
>>
>>Ken wanks because he is Ken...Therefore he wanks to be Ken and that is why
>>he is Ken.
>
>No, K e n does not wank. This verb cannot be created from the simple
>statement: K e n is K e n. Your processors seem to be faulty. Time
>for much needed repair.
Ken, they mean stop jerking off while you write this crap.
>
>>Ken here is a tip: Do not wank while you type because your hitting
>>the space bar while you type your name.
>
>Your tip is irrelevant, thus it has been discarded and flushed
>down the toilet.
>
>K e n R o b i n s o n
The tip was valid, and also unable to be flushed down a toilet as
it is electronic in nature... Oops I mean origin, since you seem
more able to comprehend the later. You Have Been Misinformed.
The Net Sugests you seek help and find the error of your ways.
Tilden
Rob Dobson
>K e n doesn't require new tactics, for the present ones are working
>within expected parameters.
YES K E N.
you are p r e d i c t a b l e
b o r i n g
r e p e t i t i v e
i suppose these three adjectives define "expected parameters"?
you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
Mr J S Graley
>
>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
>
Fuck you fucking arse shit dumb-fuck fucker twat
~THE GREAT NAME
--
Don't worry,
Its like in the comic books...
ITS NOT REAL!
Kenneth J Robinson
You seem to be quite misinformed, for K e n has never made an appearance in
alt.humor, nor has K e n attempted to post in alt.humor, for alt.humor
is non-existant in K e n's realm. If you wish to commit suicide, then that
is your prerogative, but K e n highly advises against it.
Kenneth J Robinson
>
>In article <Byws9...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1foacv...@phazer.ksu.ksu.edu> me...@phazer.ksu.ksu.edu (James Paul Walawender) writes:
>>>
>>>In article <Byqyz...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Nov24....@tdb.uu.se> t89...@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>>>>>Garrett C Cress (cr...@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu) wrote:
>>>>>:
>>>>>: Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
>>>>>: Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
>>>>>: reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.
>>>>>:
>>>>>K e n is a compulsive wanker, because K e n is K e n.
>>>>
>>>>Incorrect logic, sir. K e n is K e n and K e n cannot be a compulsive
>>>>wanker, for K e n is K e n.
>>>
>>>Ken wanks because he is Ken...Therefore he wanks to be Ken and that is why
>>>he is Ken.
>>
>>No, K e n does not wank. This verb cannot be created from the simple
>>statement: K e n is K e n. Your processors seem to be faulty. Time
>>for much needed repair.
>
>Ken, they mean stop jerking off while you write this crap.
"Jerking off" is not a process withing K e n's realm. K e n suggests that you
do a better job of gathering information. If you are making assumptions, then
you must state them to be so, otherwise, you are and will continue to make yourself
appear as a fool.
>>>Ken here is a tip: Do not wank while you type because your hitting
>>>the space bar while you type your name.
>>
>>Your tip is irrelevant, thus it has been discarded and flushed
>>down the toilet.
>>
>>K e n R o b i n s o n
>
>The tip was valid, and also unable to be flushed down a toilet as
>it is electronic in nature... Oops I mean origin, since you seem
>more able to comprehend the later. You Have Been Misinformed.
>The Net Sugests you seek help and find the error of your ways.
The tip was invalid and irrelevant. K e n made a printout of the "tip".
Printouts can be flushed down the toilet. You should consider acquiring
more effective information gathering techniques, for your's are pathetic.
Kenneth J Robinson
>
>>K e n doesn't require new tactics, for the present ones are working
>>within expected parameters.
>
>YES K E N.
>
>you are p r e d i c t a b l e
>b o r i n g
>r e p e t i t i v e
>i suppose these three adjectives define "expected parameters"?
In fact, those three adjectives describe you very well, Mr. Dobson.
But again, you are misinformed, for K e n is K e n.
>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
Such pathetic language skills. One typically thinks of an
immature brat, when seeing such utter waste. K e n suggests
you query your mother about washing procedures for your
largest facial orifice.
Mr J S Graley
K e n, You have put an apostrophe in a possesive pronoun. This is incorrect.
Mr J S Graley
Of course this is, as with any yank, his arse.
Par Svensson
:
< 14 old postings quoted by moron deleted>
:
: K e n, You have put an apostrophe in a possesive pronoun. This is incorrect.
:
What a complete "arsehole" you are, Graley. Including 21 previous postings
in your own pathetic one, only to waste space by telling K e n he's wrong,
and on top of everything proving what a sad excuse for a person you are, by
showing to the world that you even can't spell "possessive" right. And this
in a follow-up which points out a grammar mistake. I've seen many idiotic
postings before, especially in this newsgroup, but yours must be one of the
most moronic of all times. Stupid! And "University of Warwick", what a joke...
/Par
[...I know karate, voodoo too...]
Mr J S Graley
Unsubtle deliberate mistake GotAClueOMeter(tm)
|
NO CLUE [--*----------------------------] CLUE
|
Well svensson you dick, it appears you have not spotted the deliberate mistake.
This is bound to occur if you try and speak for someone 100 times your IQ such
as K e n. (not that this is a complement to our analy-retarded robot friend)
So PISS OFF AND DIE YOU LAME FLAMER
Jonathan Sloman
> most moronic of all times. Stupid! And "University of Warwick", what a joke...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Care to explain this comment? I'm just curious.
---
Jonathan (CFRN)
Andy Hart
>rw...@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>
>>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
>>
>
>Fuck you fucking arse shit dumb-fuck fucker twat
>
>~THE GREAT NAME
First of all, you idiot: Rob Dobson was spouting moronic, juvenile,
concatenations of dirty words here long before you popped up like a foul
toadstool. It is YOU who copies HIS style.
Secondly: You are still the epitome of british stupidity.
Thirdly: Eat shit, gag on it, and DIE.
-- Andy
Par Svensson
Well, I suppose I'd better, since my postings probably never
will reach the heights of your pronoun-flame with that _fantastic_
"deliberate" misspelling. I bow my head in awe.
/Par
Kenneth J Robinson
Thank you for informing K e n of a typographical error. Now return
to your playpen and play with your blocks. Good boy.
Tilden-Master of Illogic
In article <Bz3Kw...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>Ken, they mean stop jerking off while you write this crap.
>
>"Jerking off" is not a process withing K e n's realm. K e n suggests that you
>do a better job of gathering information. If you are making assumptions, then
>you must state them to be so, otherwise, you are and will continue to make yourself
>appear as a fool.
>
eroticism makes you less human than you were before. (Definition for auto-
eroticism: To stimulate one's sexual urges by means of masterbation (in case
you didn't know)) I now truely pity you for the apparent lack of sexual input
in your life, thus causing your illogic to be stemmed on us.
>>>Your tip is irrelevant, thus it has been discarded and flushed
>>>down the toilet.
>>
>>The tip was valid, and also unable to be flushed down a toilet as
>>it is electronic in nature... Oops I mean origin, since you seem
>>more able to comprehend the later. You Have Been Misinformed.
>>The Net Sugests you seek help and find the error of your ways.
>
>The tip was invalid and irrelevant. K e n made a printout of the "tip".
>Printouts can be flushed down the toilet. You should consider acquiring
>more effective information gathering techniques, for your's are pathetic.
>
Acting a wee bit childish, are we? I would expect a remark like the one
printed above to come from a kindergarden student. Your lack of reasonable
thought patterns along with the third-person referacnes to your person
seems to show a visual record of a tramatic time in your life, as to which
I can only speculate what it is, but thus causing you to be unhappy with yourself
as a being making you define yourself in the third-person. We here in the
net suggest you seek professional help with your problem, as it appears you
have done no better on your own.
Tilden
PS I recommend you refer to my letter to you for more guidance.
Tilden-Master of Illogic
In article <Bz3Kq...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>>>K e n doesn't require new tactics, for the present ones are working
>>>within expected parameters.
>>>
>>>K e n R o b i n s o n
>>
>>You mean to tell us suicide by boredom is your tactic. If that's the case,
>>keep up the good work. And I also found your posts in alt.humor to be
>>useless, they want jokes in there, not a joke like you.
>
>You seem to be quite misinformed, for K e n has never made an appearance in
>alt.humor, nor has K e n attempted to post in alt.humor, for alt.humor
I have found articles from you posted in Alt.Humor. This Illogical use of
deciet (sp?) is tedious. I suggest you try another tactic. This one has
failed.
>is non-existant in K e n's realm.
Please Define "KEN'S REALM" as explicitly as possible.
>If you wish to commit suicide, then that is your prerogative,
>but K e n highly advises against it.
>
Ken's advice is meaningless, for Ken is a lunatic.
I would like to see a picture of you to know what I'm dealing
with when I talk to you.
Tilden
Kenneth J Robinson
>
>In article <Bz3Kw...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>Ken, they mean stop jerking off while you write this crap.
>>
>>"Jerking off" is not a process withing K e n's realm. K e n suggests that you
>>do a better job of gathering information. If you are making assumptions, then
>>you must state them to be so, otherwise, you are and will continue to make
>>yourself appear as a fool.
>>
>Then I feel sorry for you. The apparent fact you have not engaged in auto-
>eroticism makes you less human than you were before. (Definition for auto-
>eroticism: To stimulate one's sexual urges by means of masterbation (in case
>you didn't know)) I now truely pity you for the apparent lack of sexual input
>in your life, thus causing your illogic to be stemmed on us.
K e n has much more useful and beneficial ways than masturbating for
satisfying K e n's sexual drive, but sex is not the topic of discussion.
Your illogicity is.
>>>>Your tip is irrelevant, thus it has been discarded and flushed
>>>>down the toilet.
>>>
>>>The tip was valid, and also unable to be flushed down a toilet as
>>>it is electronic in nature... Oops I mean origin, since you seem
>>>more able to comprehend the later. You Have Been Misinformed.
>>>The Net Sugests you seek help and find the error of your ways.
>>
>>The tip was invalid and irrelevant. K e n made a printout of the "tip".
>>Printouts can be flushed down the toilet. You should consider acquiring
>>more effective information gathering techniques, for your's are pathetic.
>>
>Acting a wee bit childish, are we? I would expect a remark like the one
>printed above to come from a kindergarden student.
No, K e n was merely stating a fact. If you cannot except facts, then
K e n suggests you seek help.
> Your lack of reasonable
>thought patterns along with the third-person referacnes to your person
>seems to show a visual record of a tramatic time in your life, as to which
>I can only speculate what it is, but thus causing you to be unhappy with yourself
>as a being making you define yourself in the third-person. We here in the
>net suggest you seek professional help with your problem, as it appears you
>have done no better on your own.
K e n refers to K e n as K e n sees fit. K e n will not model himself
on misinformation and illogicity, for it serves no beneficial purpose.
How many times must K e n repeat this? Are you incapable of understanding
simple statements?
And further, since when does Mr. Tilden speak for the net?? If you speak
for some subset of the net, then enlighten us to your identity. Have
each member post and reveal their true identity. Hiding one's
identity is a sign of mental incapabilities. Do you have a problem??
K e n will try to help you, in the best way that K e n can.
>PS I recommend you refer to my letter to you for more guidance.
Your letter was filled with vast amounts of misinformation, thus it
was discarded.
Kenneth J Robinson
>
>In article <Bz3Kq...@cs.psu.edu>, krob...@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>>>K e n doesn't require new tactics, for the present ones are working
>>>>within expected parameters.
>>>>
>>>>K e n R o b i n s o n
>>>
>>>You mean to tell us suicide by boredom is your tactic. If that's the case,
>>>keep up the good work. And I also found your posts in alt.humor to be
>>>useless, they want jokes in there, not a joke like you.
>>
>>You seem to be quite misinformed, for K e n has never made an appearance in
>>alt.humor, nor has K e n attempted to post in alt.humor, for alt.humor
>
>I have found articles from you posted in Alt.Humor. This Illogical use of
>deciet (sp?) is tedious. I suggest you try another tactic. This one has
>failed.
Incorrect. K e n does not subscribe to alt.humor, for it does not
exist in K e n's realm. Perhaps you have alt.humor confused with
rec.humor?
>>is non-existant in K e n's realm.
>
>Please Define "KEN'S REALM" as explicitly as possible.
That which is within K e n's reach, mentally, spiritually, and
physically.
>>If you wish to commit suicide, then that is your prerogative,
>>but K e n highly advises against it.
>>
>Ken's advice is meaningless, for Ken is a lunatic.
>I would like to see a picture of you to know what I'm dealing
>with when I talk to you.
K e n is not a lunatic, for K e n is K e n, and K e n cannot be
anything else but K e n. Pictures are not available for public
consumption.
JORN GUNNAR HALONEN
>
>In fact, those three adjectives describe you very well, Mr. Dobson.
>But again, you are misinformed, for K e n is K e n.
>
>>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
>
>Such pathetic language skills. One typically thinks of an
>immature brat, when seeing such utter waste. K e n suggests
>you query your mother about washing procedures for your
>largest facial orifice.
J O R N t h i n k s y o u ' r e a n i d i o t . . .
What the fuck is this stupid 'K e n' shit anyway ? As much as I
hate it I agree with Dobson regarding your repetitiveness, you
can't blow out a flame with 'Because K e n is K e n' ! If you've
run out of arguments, stop posting remarks like 'K e n thinks
you're an idiot'. I mean, it's as impressive as seeing a car on
the freeway.
Ken is Ken my ass, go lick your mothers out-fucked cunt and
FUCK YOUR SPACE KEY.
_________________________________________________________________________
| Jorn Halonen | "dinga ding dang my danga long ling long" |
| jor...@sofus.dhhalden.no | - Ministry |
Garrett C Cress
In article <jorngh.188...@dhhalden.no>, jor...@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes:
>In article <Bz3L5...@cs.psu.edu> Kenneth J Robinson repeats ...
>>
>>In fact, those three adjectives describe you very well, Mr. Dobson.
>>But again, you are misinformed, for K e n is K e n.
>>
>>>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
>>
>>Such pathetic language skills. One typically thinks of an
>>immature brat, when seeing such utter waste. K e n suggests
>>you query your mother about washing procedures for your
>>largest facial orifice.
>
>J O R N t h i n k s y o u ' r e a n i d i o t . . .
>
>What the fuck is this stupid 'K e n' shit anyway ? As much as I
>hate it I agree with Dobson regarding your repetitiveness, you
>can't blow out a flame with 'Because K e n is K e n' ! If you've
>run out of arguments, stop posting remarks like 'K e n thinks
>you're an idiot'. I mean, it's as impressive as seeing a car on
>the freeway.
>
>Ken is Ken my ass, go lick your mothers out-fucked cunt and
>FUCK YOUR SPACE KEY.
>
That's why he has the spaces in his name.
Kenneth J Robinson
>In article <Bz3L5...@cs.psu.edu> Kenneth J Robinson repeats ...
>>
>>In fact, those three adjectives describe you very well, Mr. Dobson.
>>But again, you are misinformed, for K e n is K e n.
>>
>>>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
>>
>>Such pathetic language skills. One typically thinks of an
>>immature brat, when seeing such utter waste. K e n suggests
>>you query your mother about washing procedures for your
>>largest facial orifice.
>
>J O R N t h i n k s y o u ' r e a n i d i o t . . .
K e n is not interested in what misinformed people think, for
their thoughts (which are rare and few) serve no actual purpose.
>What the fuck is this stupid 'K e n' shit anyway ?
K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be K e n, for K e n has defined
K e n as K e n, and K e n cannot be anything else other then K e n,
thus K e n is K e n.
> As much as I
>hate it I agree with Dobson regarding your repetitiveness, you
>can't blow out a flame with 'Because K e n is K e n' !
But it certainly has disrupted your behavior. It would seem that
K e n's approach is quite effective.
> If you've
>run out of arguments, stop posting remarks like 'K e n thinks
>you're an idiot'. I mean, it's as impressive as seeing a car on
>the freeway.
Your advice has been noted, determined to be irrelevant, and
then discarded.
>Ken is Ken my ass, go lick your mothers out-fucked cunt and
>FUCK YOUR SPACE KEY.
K e n suggests that you issue standard washing procedures for your
largest facial orifice. Perhaps K e n should inform your mother
of your lewd language skills.