Re: a question for Jew haters
Seon
"Sfinx" <sieg...@inbox.com> wrote in message
news:fa19cc31-1a6a-4ffb...@37g2000prx.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 18 2010, 8:22 pm, "Seon" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>> Why do anti Semites always run away when I ask them for facts? I have
>> encountered 2 or 3 of them. One time on twitter I asked for evidence to
>> prove their lie that Israel fired the rockets which started the Israel
>> bombing of the gaza strip and they ran away. On usenet I asked another
>> Jew
>> hater for evidence to back up his lies but they never provide evidence.
>> Then
>> they accuse me of being a Jew (the way Muslim haters accuse me of being a
>> Muslim) so why can't they just provide the facts and evidence to back up
>> their claims?
>
> Because they have none.
That's my point.
redux
I know, I know.
But what about this:
------------------------------------------
Appendix II - The Berne Trials
Leslie Fry
* Waters Flowing Eastward
-------------------------
" A lawyer, who assisted at the two trials, published in the
review Hammer of December, 1937, a statement according to which
the Judge (of the Lower Court) was in debt to a Jew at the time
of the trial. This very serious allegation has never to my
knowledge been denied. The Neue Berner Zeitung of October 29,
1937, formulated a not less serious complaint against the same
Judge, who was obliged by his superiors to take an action
against the paper. At the time of writing the action is not yet
over. It would seem that the Judge was hardly the proper man to
decide such a delicate question.
" It must be remarked also that, contrary to what appeared in
many newspapers, the Court of Appeal found that, in spite of
the prescriptions of the law, the reports of certain
depositions had been drawn up by the private reporters of the
Jewish plaintiffs. ' The proceedings as carried out in the
Lower Court were not in accordance with custom and law. .. .
The manner of drawing up the reports was in contradiction with
the binding prescriptions of the law (Art. 92 and 215 Str. V).'2
" That seems clear and definite. Besides, the reports had not
been read to the accused and had not been signed, as the law
prescribes. In addition, witnesses for the defence had not been
convoked and the Judge (of the Lower Court) had accepted from
the plaintiffs, as coming from Moscow, photographs which had
been insufficiently legalized as well as faulty translations of
Russian documents. Is it astonishing then that the accused were
condemned by the Lower Court and that the Jews rejoiced? The
proof that the Protocols were a forgery had been furnished at
last.
" But they had to change their tune. The Bernese Court of
Appeal quashed the judgment of the Lower Court. The Higher
Court found fault with the setting-up of a commission of
experts to examine the question of the authenticity of the
Protocols, since the authenticity or non-authenticity of the
Protocols did not concern the Court. Moreover, the Court of
Appeal severely criticized the choice of the experts,
especially the selection of the third. ' If we leave out of
account the completely unnecessary expense of the other
judgments, in the circumstances, this would have been
satisfactory, provided that the third expert selected had been
completely impartial and unprejudiced. C. A. Loosli, however,
had already, in 1937, published a pamphlet entitled Die
Schlimmen Juden, in which he had characterized the Protocols as
a recklessly malevolent fabrication and had heaped scorn on
them as a forgery, in a manner that was purely polemical and
absolutely unscientific. The form that Loosli's judgment in the
matter would take was, therefore, capable of being to a large
degree calculated in advance, so that he did not enjoy the
requisite confidence of all parties'.3. The Court then drew the
obvious conclusion: ' Such a mode of appointing an expert is
not up to standard.'
" It will be enough to mention one fact in order to justify
this criticism of the expert, Loosli. A few pages back I showed
that the testimony of Radziwill was valueless, since it has
been proved that the Protocols had already been published in
1903. Loosli wanted, nevertheless, to make use of Radziwill's
testimony in his professional report of October, 1934. To get
out of the difficulty, he simply changed the date of
Radziwill's testimony from 1903 to 1895.
" The result of the second trial was never in doubt. The
accused (Fischer and Schnell) were acquitted, and one of them
had to pay 100 francs costs out of a total of about 28,000
francs. Here it is interesting to note that the whole Jewish
Press took good care not to mention that this slight penalty
had nothing to do with the Protocols. You will remember what I
said at the beginning, namely, that the Jews had included other
publications in their action. The 100 francs costs were imposed
on Mr. T. Fischer because of the article entitled
Shweizermadchen hiite dich vor schandenden Juden.
" A more disastrous result for the Jews could hardly be
imagined. And what made it harder for them to bear was the fact
that the Bernese Higher Court alluded to a judgment of the
Federal Court, in which it was stated that the Swiss Law does
not forbid and ' could not forbid journalists to express even
very advanced opinions on the Jewish question, however painful
these expressions of opinion might be for the Israelites.'
" The Jews however are already ' putting across ' their own
version of the trial. The Jewish Daily Post of April 28, 1935,
wrote that the first trial had shown " the success that could
be achieved by means of good Jewish organization ". This
excellent organization was ready to go into action after the
disaster of the second trial, as a couple of examples will show.
" The Jewish Chronicle of November 5, 1937, wrote that the
Court of Appeal had declared the Protocols a forgery and had
held that they must be regarded as trashy literature. The same
review asserted that the Court found that the falsity of the
Protocols had been proved. In reality the Court of Appeal had
declared that the authenticity of the Protocols had not been
proved, which does not mean that their falsity had been proved.
The Higher Tribunal added that the Lower Court should not have
entered upon that question at all. ' To enter upon an expert
examination of that question and carry it out was altogether
superfluous '.*. The statement of the Jewish Chronicle must be
stigmatized as contrary to the truth.
" The Revue de Geneve (Jewish Review of Geneva), in its issue
of November 1937, and the Journal des Nations, in its issue of
November 3, 1937, were nearer the truth and sinned only by
omission. They wrote that " the proofs of the authenticity of
the Protocols had not been furnished," but they left out that
the Lower Court had been blamed for having raised the question
of authenticity, as that question did not concern it.
" It is a universally admitted principle of historical
criticism that when a document has been discovered, that
document must be held to be authentic so long as its lack of
authenticity, in other words, its falsity, has not been proved.
This has always been the rule in regard to historical
criticism. When it is stated that proof of the authenticity of
the Protocols has not been furnished, the cart is put before
the horse. It is for the Jews to prove that the Protocols
constitute a forgery, and we know that all the attempts to
prove this have been lamentable failures. What is more, it is
known that the Provisional [Russian] Government of Prince Lwow,
Freemason, handed over to the Jew Winawer, all the documents
concerning the Protocols that were to be found in the Russian
Home Office or at the Police Headquarters. If a proof or even a
shadow of a proof, of the falsity of the Protocols had been
found amongst these documents, the Jews would have published it
immediately.
" I do not intend to weary my readers with the account of other
misrepresentations and skilfully concocted affirmations similar
to those I have mentioned. It is a pity that writers, whose
good faith cannot be called in question, take their information
from such dubious sources. They make the mistake of not
subjecting those sources to the severe criticism indispensable
in a matter that aroused so much passionate feeling, and they
neglect to consult the official documents. They thus contribute
to get the false Jewish version accepted. They consider that
they are acting charitably in defending unfortunate victims of
persecution and calumny, while in reality they are working for
the triumph of the Jews.
" A Belgian religious wrote a short time ago that the decision
of the Higher Cantonal Court confirmed the judgment of the
Lower Court magistrate with regard to the falsity of the
Protocols. The same author also asserted that the Court
declared the Protocols to be ' a document written in bad faith,
a malignant and poisonous forgery'.5 The Reverend Father is
wrong. It was not the Court, but the barristers for the Jews
who attacked the Protocols as the vilest product of the
printing press ever published in Switzerland. I have carefully
perused the 53 folio pages of the judgment and I can affirm
that the Court nowhere declared the Protocols to be ' a
document written in bad faith, a malignant and poisonous
forgery.' That statement is absolutely opposed to the truth.
" The Court certainly made use of some very severe epithets,
such as ' stupid Jew-baiting,' ' attempt to defame the Jews as
a body,' but these were employed with reference to the article
Shweizermadchen hiite dich vor schandenden Juden, which had
nothing to do with the Protocols, but which the Jews had
cleverly included in their case.
" The Court declared that the Protocols were ' shoddy or trashy
literature in the aesthetic and literary.. . sense.' With that
judgment we are in complete agreement. What remains to be
determined is who is the author of this ' trashy literature.'
On that point the Court declared itself incompetent."
-
1. Extract from Les Protocols des Sages de Sion constituent-ils
un faux by H. de Vries de Heekelingen (Printed at Lausanne,
1938). In May 1935, the Judge of the Lower Court of the Swiss
Canton of Berne, Meyer, gave judgment in the action taken by
the Swiss Jewish Association and the Jewish Community of Berne
against Theodore Fischer and Silvio Schnell concerning the
Protocols and other publications. An appeal was lodged by
Fischer and Schnell against the judgment, and the Court of
Appeal or Higher Court of Berne gave its decision in October,
1937.
2. M. de Vries de Heekelingen here quotes the German text of
the Judgment.
3. M. de Vries de Heekelingen again quotes from the German text
of the High Court's decision.
4. M. de Vries de Heekelingen again quotes from the German text
of the High Court's decision.
5. Article in La Nouvelle Revue tHeologique (January, 1938, p.
57) by the R. Pere Pierre Charles, S.J.
------------------------------------------
redux
Yep. Heard that before.
But what about this?
---------------------------------------
1.1 The Balfour Declaration
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
-----------------------
The world war had entered its fourth year in the latter part of
1917, with no indication of a rapid settlement in sight. The
complexity and variety of events, increasing with the years,
had emphasized its universal character. Every country
engaged-whether America, Germany, Russia, Greece, France,
Italy, or England-found its entire interests, political,
economic, and ethnic, involved in the issue. All these nations
seemed gripped in a deadlock, and at the same time felt the
pressing need of deliverance.
Before 1917, it had been thought that if the allies continued
to hold the western front, the Russian "steam roller" would
crash the central powers by sheer force of numbers. But the
"steam roller" had itself exploded: there had been a
revolution, and, by the end of July, Russian troops had
withdrawn from Bessarabia and Moldavia, and between the
Dniester and the Pruth, leaving the eastern front undefended.
If this loss was somewhat offset by the fact that America, in
spite of the President's reluctance, had finally joined the
allies, it was still doubtful whether her forces would arrive
in time and in sufficient numbers to be of real military value.
The scale on which the war was waged made all usual methods of
reaching a settlement out of the question: no outside Power
could be invoked as mediator; the Pope had issued a peace
proposal on August 1, but the allies regarded it as inspired by
Germany and turned a deaf ear.
Allied statesmen had cast about for some principle on which an
honourable peace could be proposed, if a crushing defeat could
not be inflicted on the enemy. The principle of nationalities,
viz., the right of small nations to form their own government,
had been advanced, and had met with general acceptance.
Thus America's object in entering the war, according to
President Wilson, was "to deliver the peoples of the world from
autocracy," "to make the world safe for democracy," and the
like. But the application of this principle presented
difficulties. That Germany and Austria should be broken up into
Poland, Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary, Jugo-Slavia, etc., in the way
that afterward occurred, was one matter; but the example of
Russia, and the possibility of the principle being applied to
England, then troubled by Irish agitators, and the other
allies, led many to dread a completely dismembered Europe.
Nevertheless, the idea had acquired a large measure of
popularity in cities where reaction against over-organization
had created an intense desire for freedom.
In rough, this was the situation when the British government
issued a note favouring a national home for the Jews: it took
the form of a letter addressed to Lord Rothschild and signed by
the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Sir Arthur (later
Lord) Balfour, and read:
Foreign Office,
November 2, 1917.
"Dear Lors Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you on
behalf of His Majesty's Government the following declaration of
sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been
submitted to, and approved by the Cabinet:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the
establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish
people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the
achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which, may prejudice the civil and
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in
any other country."
I should be grateful if you would bring this
declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Arthur James BalfourYours sincerely,
ARTHUR JAMES BALFOUR."
Thus it was that the Jews, the "Chosen People," after centuries
of ispersion, were to be established in a homeland. Here was
poetic justice; it seemed as though nineteen centuries of
wrongs were to be righted.
Six weeks later, the newspapers were full of the triumphal
entry of General Allenby into Jerusalem, and the conquest of
the Holy Land by the British army which included Jewish units:
to the religious-minded, it was as though Providence had set
the seal of approval on the Balfour declaration. Sceptics, on
the other hand, remarked callously that Allenby's army had been
loitering about Palestine inactive for the last four months;
that Jerusalem offered no resistance and one week ought to have
sufficed for staging his entry. His forces undoubtedly counted
some Jews in the commissary department, as there are in all
armies; but the credit for the conquest was almost wholly due
to the assistance of the Arabs, over a hundred thousand strong,
to whom the promise of autonomy had been made by England in
1915. The Balfour declaration was a direct violation of this
promise. But for every miracle there are unbelievers!
More than a decade has passed, and, looking back, one is
inclined to ask a few questions: Why was it that the British
cabinet with a war on its hands resolved to set aside a
national home for the Jews ? Had the cabinet proposed a home in
the Near East to the Armenians first, and on the latter's
refusal turned to the Jews ? Was it to be an asylum for
cripples and orphans; or a religious centre; or a sort of
Liberia, like African Liberia founded in 1822 for freed
negroes? Or were all the Jews in the world supposed to migrate
back to Palestine ? This last idea, though excellent in theory,
would hardly be feasible.
Reading the declaration carefully, it becomes clear that
certain Jews (the Zionist group), and not all the Jews, wanted
a "national home": they may even have intimated their desire to
some member of the cabinet. Sir Arthur was dining one evening
at Lord Rothschild's country place and admiring his beautiful
home, when, at the mention of that word, Lord Rothschild,
turning away to hide a tear, said sadly that some of his
friends "had no home [that is, no national home] where they
could lay their heads." Sir Arthur was touched and said he
would mention it to His Majesty and to his colleagues, and knew
that they would express their sympathy for Lord Rothschild's
friends in distress. Accordingly, the declaration of sympathy
followed a few days later.
For those who are satisfied with the above explanation there is
no need to read further; those, however, who desire a fuller
account of things may be willing to discard popular fallacies
and study things afresh. As a background, a general idea of the
history and character of the Jews and their institutions is
essential.
The longest path may be the shortest in the end.
---------------------------------------
redux
Yep. We know that already.
But what about this?
-------------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
1.4 Ginzberg The Interpreter Of Jewish Aims
-------------------------------------------
If Herzl strove to modify and conciliate Jewish ambition with
its gentile surroundings, it was the task of Ginzberg to give
it a new form and the strength of mass fanaticism.
Asher Ginzberg 1 was born at Skvira, in the province of Kiev,
in 1856, of well-to-do parents belonging to the Jewish sect of
Hassidim. He received a strictly rabbinical education and, at
seventeen, married the grand-daughter of a prominent rabbi,
Menachem Mendel. Five years later (1878), he moved to Odessa,
where he continued his studies, with special attention to the
works of Spinoza, Moses Mendelssohn, and Nietzsche. Not long
after, 2 he visited Berlin, Breslau, and Vienna where he met
Charles Netter, a French Jew and one of the founders of the
Alliance Israelite Universelle, who introduced him into that
body.
It was thus that, in 1884, on his return to Odessa, Ginzberg
joined the Friends of Zion 3 under Leo Pinsker and Moses
Lilienblum, and attended the conference at Katto-witz. His
shrewd, restless mind and command of Hebrew soon raised him to
prominence: a letter in Hebrew to the scientist S. Finn on his
seventieth birthday, attracted the notice of Alexander
Zederbaum. Zederbaum was the editor of the Hebrew paper
Ha-melitz, and immediately invited Ginzberg to contribute.
Although he had constantly criticized the methods of the
Friends of Zidh privately, he hesitated to do so in print; but
finally overcoming his scruples, he sent in a radical article,
entitled Not the Way, 4 which appeared the same year (1889). In
it, Ginzberg attacked Pinsker's plan of sending Russian Jews to
Palestine for the material advantages they might derive. 5 All
attempts to improve the condition of Russian ghettoes were
futile, he insisted; the Jews must first become consciously,
aggressively national. The article with its direct appeal to
fanaticism was read by Jews all over Europe; other articles by
the same pen followed.
He now broke with the Friends of Zion, and with him went a
group of young men who had come to share his advanced views.
These men he formed (1889) into a secret organization called
the Sons of Moses. 6 It met in his house in Yamskaya Street,
Odessa, and numbered among its first members, Ben Avigdor,
Zalman Epstein, Louis Epstein, and Jacob Eisenstaat. It was to
this small group that Ginzberg read what is to-day known as "
the protocols ", 7 in which the national aim is set forth in
such direct, forceful language, -in strange contrast to the
confused, pedantic style of the Talmud.
The opening words give the tone of the whole.
" Let us put aside phraseology and discuss the inner
meaning of every thought: by comparison and deduction let us
illuminate the situation. In this way I will describe our
system, both from our own point of view and that of the goyims.
" It must be remembered that people with base instincts,"
he continues, " are more numerous than those with noble ones;
therefore, the best results in governing are achieved through
violence and intimidation, and not through academic discussion.
Every man seeks power; every one would like to become a
dictator if he possibly could; and rare indeed are those who
would not sacrifice the common good in order to attain personal
advantage."
The argument is then developed with conciseness and lucidity:
all objections are anticipated and met in a few terse phrases.
No rhetorical effect is sought; expression is natural and
vivid: e.g. of the mob at the time of a revolution, 9 the
author says:
" These beasts fall asleep when they have drunk enough
blood; it is then easy to shackle them."
The Protocols are sometimes criticized as containing nothing
that had not been said previously by philosophers or statesmen;
but even if that were true, it would detract little from their
interest. For their importance does not lie in the aim, world
domination, nor in the theory by which it is attained,
exploitation of man's baser instincts, but in the extraordinary
astuteness with which the practical application of the plan has
been suited to existing conditions.
The very fact that the language is forceful and incisive, that
all the allusions are striking, and the thesis so to speak
irrefutable, is to some an obstacle to belief: nor is this
surprising.
If, at Waterloo, Napoleon had had a battalion of tanks and a
few batteries of modern eight-inch guns, the forces of England
and Prussia would have been driven from the field: with the
improved methods of warfare of the last century at his command,
he could have defied the armies of the world in 1814.
For the past century the Jews have been making rapid progress
in the theory and practice of politics, while the rest of the
world thought them merely emerging from the ghetto; and, as it
cannot understand the intricate new machinery of government
they have devised and set up, it says, " Such a thing is
impossible." Yet, like a great engine of war, the organization
of the Kahal advances on the course determined, crashing all
resistance.
That course is succinctly stated in the twenty-four protocols
of Ginzberg: they are an epitome of Jewish thought from Rabbi
Akiba 10 and Maimonides 11 down to Marx 12 and Engels. At the
same time the reader is reminded constantly of some familiar
event of recent years which bears out the thesis. For example
the passage: 13
" To show that all the gentile governments of Europe are
enslaved by us, we will manifest our power by subjecting one of
them to a reign of terror, violence and crime."
Can anyone, recalling the Russian revolution of 1918, read
this, knowing it was written before 1897, 14 and not be
impressed by the correspondence between the prophecy and its
fulfilment two decades later?
But Ginzberg was no visionary: he knew of what he wrote, and
the course of the revolutionary movement already on foot in
Russia had been too carefully calculated to leave any doubt as
to its eventual success.
The Second International was formed in 1889, and the theories
of Marx and Engels adopted. The labour movement was no longer
represented by a small group of workingmen led by theorists,
but by powerful national organizations of workers. Therefore
the aim of the Second International to secure the transfer of
power to the proletariat was to be pursued under conditions
more favourable than those which had prevailed at the time of
the First International. The dominant industrial and financial
interests served to further the objectives of the socialists
through a callous disregard for labour. 15
In 1900, on Lenin's return from exile, appeared the first
number of the revolutionary paper Iskra (" The Spark ") edited
in London by Trotski (Braunstein) a Jew, and supported by
another Jew, Blumenfeld. 16 Organizations directed by Iskra
spread throughout Russia: it was the source from which the
ideas of local leaders were derived. In March 1903, there
emerged at its first meeting in Minsk, a completely formed
Russian communist party; it represented six organizations and
was headed by nine men, of whom at least five were of Jewish
descent. 17 It was known as the " Russian social democratic
party " (until 1918), and its methods as well as its motto "
Proletarians of all countries, unite ", were those of Marx and
Engels. A second congress of the party met at Brussels and then
at London, in July and August, of the same year. Here the
doctrine that " the necessary condition of the social
revolution is the dictatorship of the proletariat ", was
expressed for the first time. 18
Then came the split between bolsheviks and mensheviks, and the
movement faced its first real test in 1905. Weakened by defeat
in the war with Japan, the Tsarist government could not
forestall strikes and disorders. The shooting down of workmen
who had assembled before the winter palace encouraged the
bolsheviks to attempt an armed uprising. A congress of the
party met in London on April 25, 1905, and formulated the
programme which was to be put in practice twelve years later. 19
The outbreak in Russia was immediately hailed by a Zionist
paper as the work of Jews.
" The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution, a crisis
in Jewish history. It is a Jewish revolution because Russia is
the home of about half the Jews of the world, and an
overturning of its despotic government must have a very
important influence on the destinies of the millions living
there and on the many thousands who have recently emigrated to
other countries. But the revolution in Russia is a Jewish
revolution also because Jews are the most active revolutionists
in the Tsar's empire ". 20
Unsupported by the peasants and the army, the revolts of 1905
failed. A period of reaction set in, bringing with it the
arrest and exile of many of the revolutionary leaders. From
that time, in fact, plans for a revolution in Russia had to be
entirely directed from abroad. How the old leaders usually
managed to escape their prison sentences; 21 how they secured
funds to travel about and participate in congresses in
Stockholm, Paris, Prague, Berne and other cities; and how they
managed to keep alive a central organization is not explained
in published documents; but the connection between these
subversive activities and Zionism will become clearer further
on. 22
Meantime the protocols, secretly circulated in Hebrew among the
Sons of Moses, had helped the expansion of that order
throughout Russia and Poland and contributed to its victory at
the Basle congress in 1897, 23 when Zionism became an official
movement.
But when Ginzberg saw that Herzl's conception of Zionism was "
an economic one first and foremost ", 24 excluding as it seemed
the spirit of Jewish nationalism, he gathered his old adherents
into a new secret order, the Sons of Zipn (B'nai Zion) to
propagate the true faith. While affecting himself to keep
outside of the official movement, he edited a Hebrew paper,
Hashiloah (" The Way "), thanks to financial aid from a Moscow
tea merchant, a Jew, Kalonymous Wissotzkii, and became head of
a great Hebrew publishing firm called Ahiasaf. With these
powerful organs, he could attack Herzl with impunity. One of
the latter's friends complains : 25
" Ahad-ha-am (Ginzberg) reproaches Herzl with wanting to
imitate Europe. He (Ginzberg) cannot admit that we should
borrow from Europe its academies, operas, white gloves. The
only thing he would transfer from Europe into Altneuland (i.e.
Palestine) would be the principles of the inquisition, the way
of acting of the anti-semites, the restrictions of the Rumanian
laws... He understands freedom as practised in the ghetto, only
in his conception the parts are reversed: persecutions are to
continue, but this time, of the gentiles by the Jews... He is
one of the worst enemies of Zionism, and it is our duty to
protest against its name being used by him. His conception is
the exact opposite of Zionism, and he would mislead us by
speaking (slightingly) of ' political' Zionism, in contrast to
' this secret Zionism 26 which is his very own."
Fourteen years of labour at last began to show fruit. In 1911,
Ginzberg's representatives, Chaim Weizmann and others, scored a
victory at the tenth Zionist Congress. Two years later (1913),
" when he visited the congress for the second time," writes a
disciple, 27 " he was happy. He could see how some of his
ideas, some of the truths that he had fought so bitterly to
advance, were already working within. He was happy, as a
practical philosopher should feel when he realizes that his
life has not been in vain, that he has been one link in the
long chain that pulls Israel to a glorious future, that he has
served Israel, and, through Israel, mankind ".
From this point, Zionism, as Ginzberg understood it, became a
reality which his disciples 28 have since carried from victory
to victory under the eye of the master. He himself remained
aloof, at least from public view, until his death in 1927 in a
Judaized Palestine.
-
1. His pen-name was Ahad-ha-am, lit. " one of the people "; his
father was a tax-collector.
2. Between 1882 and 1884.
3. Hoveve Zion: supra, ch. III.
4. Lo ha-shiloah.
5. Certainly in this he showed great shrewdness.
6. B'nai Moshe.
7. Infra Part : The Protocols. From internal evidence the date
of the protocols may be placed between 1880-1890.
8. The text itself should be studied: to paraphrase or quote a
few passages from it is to give a very defective notion of this
important work.
9. Protocol II.
10. Compiler of the Mischna (from shanah " to repeat ") or oral
tradition of the Jews in the second century A. D. See Preface
to Mischna by Maimonides; also, Milman, A History of the Jews,
p. 133.
11. Spanish Jew, author of commentaries on Mischna and other
works, in the twelfth century.
12. Karl Marx, author of Das Kapital, founder of first
international, (1818-1883); joint author with Engels of
communist manifesto. Marx's real name was Mordecai.
13. Protocol VII, last paragraph.
14. A copy of the Protocols has been in the records of the
British Museum since 1906: infra Part n, Chapter I.
15. W. R. Batsell, Soviet Rule in Russia (Published under the
auspices of the Bureau of International Research of Harvard
University New York, 1929), p. 756.
16. Batsell, op. cit., pp. 49, 691, 692.
17. Ibid., pp. 689, 690.
18. Ibid., p. 692. Compare, " It suffices even for an instant
to give the masses self-government, and they will become a
disorganized mob... Capital which is entirely in our hands,
will hold out to this state a straw, to which it will
inevitably be forced to cling." Protocol I, par. 6.
19. The central committee in 1905 was composed of the well
known revolutionaries: Lenin (Ulianov), Rykov, Krassin
(Vinter), Bogdanov, and Postalovskii; Batsell, op. cit., p. 694.
20. The Maccabean (New York, Nov., 1905), p. 250, under the
title " A Jewish Revolution ".
21. Thanks to the fraternity for the freeing of delinquent
Jews: supra ch. II.
22. Infra, ch. V.
23. The Sons of Moses (B'nai Moshe) having achieved its object,
was dissolved after the congress; for the latter, see supra,
ch. III.
24. In the words of Richard Gottheil, Chief Rabbi of New York
City.
25. Pamphlet entitled Audiatur et Altera Pars by Dr. Max
Nordau, 1903, at the time of the publication of Herzl's novel
Altneuland, which Ginzberg attacked.
26. That set forth in the protocols.
27. Jesse Sampler, in his Guide to Zionism.
28. Among these should be mentioned Chaim Weizmann, Nahum
Sokolov, Leon Simon, Jabotinskii, Ussitchin, Schmaryar Levin.
-------------------------------------------
redux
Yep. Heard that more than once.
But what about this?
------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
1.5 Zionists And Anti-Zionists During World War I
-------------------------------------------------
It has frequently been observed that Europe, whether considered
as a whole or as so many separate countries, lost rather than
benefited by the world war: the victorious allies, with a huge
burden of debt, came off hardly better than the vanquished. But
to Zionism, the war brought untold wealth and the complete
realization of an immediate aim.
" The present war ", wrote Sokolov at the time, 1 " has not
affected the unity of the Zionist organization. As the latter
was established on the federal principle, it was found possible
to continue the essential work of the movement by utilizing the
separate organizations of the different countries. The work of
propaganda and the collection of funds... actually made great
progress."
It may therefore be interesting to trace its activities in four
capitals, Berlin, Petrograd, London and New York, during this
period.
At the outbreak of the war, Zionism had its headquarters in
Berlin. 2 There also were the headquarters of the moderate
party, represented by the society, Hilfsverein der deutschen
Juden. This society had built in the Holy Land a number of
schools, seminaries, and other institutions, superior to those
of the Alliance Israelite Universelle and the Zionists. On this
account, Germany had promised the society control over
Palestine, as soon as she had completed the Berlin-Bagdad
railway. But as such an eventuality would not have suited
Zionist plans, they looked to a different solution.3 "The inner
actions committee," we learn,1 "which met regularly in Berlin
and transacted all international business between congresses,
was composed of members dispersed in various countries. Dr.
Schmaryar Levin had come to America to attend the Zionist
Convention in June (1914). His presence in America during the
war was valuable both for American Zionism and the
international cause. Warburg and Hantke, two Gentfan members,
were in Berlin where they remained practically throughout the
war; Jacobson, another German member, was then in
Constantinople."
The strength of this Zionist international chain of
communication did not escape the notice of the German
government, which sought its support in addition to that of the
Hilfsverein. In June 1915, an appeal was sent out from Berlin
to all Zionists "asking for sympathy with Germany".* The
Zionists, however, were too shrewd to commit themselves while
the issue of the war was still doubtful; at the same time, they
wished to keep Germany's confidence, which they subsequently
exploited in connection with Russia. They therefore refused the
request with the ironical explanation that "the Zionist
movement could not be involved in world politics".
The following year, they secretly transferred their support
from the central powers to the allies, and their headquarters
from Berlin to London.6 From then on, their influence was felt
more and more in political circles in Europe and America. In
particular the Zionist Transfer Department, as it was called,
was in a position to transmit funds and information to
subversive elements in enemy countries. In this connection,
Jacobson, seeing that "Constantinople could no longer be the
centre of Zionist politics, left for Copenhagen, where, in a
neutral country, he could be of practical use to the Zionists
by transmitting information and funds. There he established a
Zionist bureau. Chlenov, one of the Russian members, went back
and forth between Russia and Denmark, and eventually went to
England. Another Russian member, Nahum Sokolov, moved about
freely in the allied countries ".7 Rudolf Steiner, occult
adviser to the Kaiser, passed freely between Germany and
England during the whole period of hostilities, in spite of
police regulations. " By its dependable financial methods, it
established what was practically a Zionist credit throughout
the world. This had no small share in bringing about that
attitude on the part of the allied governments which later
resulted in their recognition of the Zionist organization as
the official representative of the Jewish people."8
The chief task which engaged the Zionists at this time (1916)
was the revolutionary movement in Russia. The body of
professional revolutionaries which had prepared and directed
the outbreak of 1905, had continued its subversive work through
congresses held in the different capitals of Europe with
undiminished zeal.9 Lenin had become the acknowledged leader of
the bolsheviks: with him on the central committee (elected in
1912) and later prominent among those who took over the control
of Russia were: Zinoviev (Jew), Ordzhonikidze (Georgian),
Schwarzmann (Jew), Spandarian (Armenian), and later Stalin
(Georgian), and Belostolskii (Jew).io Outside of it, Trotski
(Jew) was active both in New York and London.
Since 1914, these and other professional agitators had been
carrying on, principally in Switzerland, a campaign against the
war, which they hoped to turn into a class struggle.11 Under
wartime conditions, however, a well organized revolutionary
movement was difficult to effect. In 1905 the party in Russia
had counted three million adherents, in 1906 one million, in
1907 three-quarters of a million, in 1908 only 174,000, and in
1910 just 46,000. In April 1917, a congress of the party
claimed to represent 76,000 organized workers. It would be idle
to fancy that this minute body was in any sense representative
of the 'proletariat', or that it could become a welcome ruler,
seven months later, over millions of people.12 But the Zionist
task was facilitated by a clever exploitation of the German
general staff in the beginning of 1917. The latter, in order to
render Russia impotent and thus free troops for use on the
western front, staked more on the use of subversives and thus
played the Zionist game. " Some man in Germany ", writes
General von Hoffmann, then chief of the German staff on the
Russian front, 13 " who had connections with the Russian
revolutionaries exiled in Switzerland, came upon the idea of
employing some of them in order to hasten the undermining and
poisoning of the morale of the Russian army. He applied to the
deputy Erzberger and the deputy of the foreign office. And thus
it came about that Lenin was conveyed through Germany to
Petersburg in the manner that afterward transpired ". On May
10, 1917, shortly after his arrival in Russia from the sealed
German railway car, Lenin spoke at the Petrograd conference of
his party against the provisional government.14 He wanted to
destroy at the roots every reminder of Russia's Slavic past. He
feared that a " bourgeois government would make the Soviets
unnecessary ",15
How, in the course of the ten months following, the bolsheviks
replaced the provisional government, and, by preventing the
constituent assembly from meeting, remained the absolute
masters of Russia; how, faithful to their Zionist patrons, they
manifested the strength of Zionism by subjecting the Tsar's
empire to a " reign of terror, violence, and crime ",16 is
common knowledge and cannot be treated here. Suffice it to say
that they justified the judgment of the Austrian foreign
minister, Count Czernin, who wrote (Nov. 17, 1917):"
" This Russian bolshevism is a peril to Europe, and if we
had the power, beside securing a tolerable peace for ourselves,
to force other countries into a state of law and order, then it
would be better to have nothing to do with such people as
these, but to march on Petersburg and arrange matters there.
Their leaders are almost all of them Jews, with altogether
fantastic ideas, and I do not envy the country that is governed
by them. The way they begin is this: everything in the least
reminiscent of work, wealth, and culture, must be destroyed,
and the bourgeoisie exterminated. Freedom and equality seem no
longer to have any place on their programme: only a bestial
suppression of all but the proletariat itself."1"
Zionism gained immeasurably by this success in both money and
influence. Crown jewels and possessions, millions of paper
rubles put into circulation, art treasures in museums,
churches, and private houses, all have been turned to its
account. Besides, the dramatic triumph of the ruthless methods
advocated by Ginzberg did much to overawe the opposition to
Zionism among the Jews. As a leading Zionist said:19
" The downfall of the tsardom of Russia was undoubtedly one
of the greatest events in the world's history. Russia entered
into a period of revolution which seemed to bring with it all
the blessings of right and liberty. The restrictions affecting
nationalities and creeds were removed. But far from destroying
Zionism, the new liberty gave it an immense stimulus." (The
blessings mentioned, it appears, are reserved exclusively for
Zionists.)
While these events were taking place in Petrograd, Zionists in
London were not idle. " London from the beginning was the
financial centre of the Zionist organization ";20 for, while
the rival banking firm of Bleichroeder Mendelssohn in Berlin
continued their support of the moderates, Rothschild had been
won to the new movement. Nahum Sokolov had, during his frequent
visits as member of the inner actions committee, been impressed
with the opportunities offered for establishing a centre
there:21 since 1914, he and Chaim Weizmann had been actively
working to bring its political problems to the fore in England.
To this end, Weizmann had entered into intimate " relations
with the house of Rothschild and done much to make this family
more closely acquainted with Zionism."22
Among the non-Jews, an invaluable friend was found in Sir Mark
Sykes. How he was won to the cause is not clear:23 before the
war he disliked it as " bad cosmopolitanism and finance," but,
in the middle of the war, came to the decision which he
announced in Hull, that " It would mean that every Jew
throughout the world would be made more valuable to the state
which he had chosen for himself."24 However that may be, from
the beginning of 1917, Sykes devoted himself heart and soul to
the movement, and his house at No. 9 Buckingham Gate, "
equipped with all such materials as correspondence files and
telegraphic communications, became a Zionist centre."25
Collaborating with Sykes was another gentile, Georges Picot.
The first official meeting of what was known as the " Political
Committee " took place on February 7, 1917, at the house of Dr.
Moses Gaster. There were present (besides Gaster) Lord
Rothschild, James de Rothschild, Sir Mark Sykes, Sir Herbert
Samuel, Herbert Bentwich, Harry Sacker, Joseph Cowen, Chaim
Weizmann, and Nahum Sokolov.26
The Zionist programme to serve as a basis for official
negotiations, covering the future mandates of Palestine,
Armenia, Mesopotamia, and a kingdom of the Hedjaz, was
discussed in detail.27 On the following day (Feb. 8) there was
a second, smaller conference, with Georges Picot, at Sykes'
house: the result was a plan known as the Sykes-Picot
agreement, which was then put into execution.
Sokolov left for Paris to negotiate with the French government.
On March 22, 1917, he was received at the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, where he " outlined the principles of the Zionist
programme. He received the assurance that the French government
regarded the programme very favorably and was authorized to
inform the Zionist organizations of Russia and America of this
result by telegraph."28 Sykes left for Rome, and thence for
Port Said and Cairo; then to Jeddah to negotiate with King
Hussein, returning on June 14 to London, where he was occupied
until November 1917, arranging the preliminaries for the
Balfour declaration.29
One must not suppose that this was all done on the sole
initiative of the London group; on the contrary," every idea
born in London was tested by the Zionist organization in
America, and every suggestion from America received the most
careful attention in London."çî
The details of the diplomatic conversations in London which led
to the declaration have not yet been made public; but, of the
British cabinet besides Sir Herbert Samuel, Lloyd George, if
not already a Zionist, was easily won to the cause;31 while Sir
Arthur Balfour and other members who had the good of the nation
at heart, were yet inclined to view it favourably from the
following considerations:
a) The financial support of the Rothschilds, at a time when the
country had to float loan after loan, would be lost, if the
Zionist request were refused.
b) If granted, it would ensure Jewish co-operation throughout
the empire and in other countries, both during the war and in
the future.
c) The Palestine mandate, coupled with that of Mesopo tamia,
was the gateway to India: by calling it " a national home for
the Jews", England would lull French and Italian jealousy.
As against these, the mandate constituted a breach of England's
promise made to the Arabs in 1915 in return for their support
in fighting Turkey. To offset this objection, the Zionists
generously proposed to give the Arabs what they already owned,
but with the new title of " Kingdom of the Hedjaz ".
Moreover the cabinet could count on a number of Zionist votes
in the House, notably Sir Alfred Mond (the late Lord
Melchett)32 and Sir Philip Sassoon among the Conservatives, and
more among Lloyd George's following. The shrewder members of
the cabinet realized that they would eventually have to reckon
with the British taxpayer, and the commercial advantages33 of
Palestine lost nothing in Zionist exposition. But the great
plea was that the English and the Jews, the two great trading
races of the world, should unite forces and take over the trade
routes between Europe and Asia.34
Although the Zionists had made all preliminary arrangements
with the allied governments and the cabinet as a whole was
desirous of complying with every point, yet some
over-scrupulous member,35 with (the Zionists thought) undue
regard for the actual inhabitants of Palestine, altered the
text Weizmann's committee had prepared.36 Instead of the words,
" The reconstitution of Palestine as the national home of the
Jewish people ", at the last minute were substituted the words,
" The establishment of a national home in Palestine ".
" It can scarcely be necessary to explain at length," wrote
Asher Ginzberg indignantly three years later,37 " the
difference between the two versions. Had the British government
accepted the version suggested to it, its promise might have
been interpreted as meaning that Palestine, inhabited as it now
is, was restored to the Jewish people on the ground of its
historic right; that the Jewish people was to rebuild its waste
places and was destined to rule over it and manage all its
affairs in its own way, without regard to the consent or
non-consent of its present inhabitants. For this rebuilding (it
might have been understood) is only a renewal of the ancient
right of the Jews, which overrides the right of the present
inhabitants who have wrongly established their national home on
a land not their own."
It does not seem, however, that Ginzberg advocated the Jews
withdrawing from the rich lands of Europe and America, on the
ground that they have there " wrongly established their
national home on a land not their own."
The Balfour declaration was issued on November 2, 1917, and
transmitted to Lord Rothschild on behalf of the Zionist
federation.38 Its endorsement by the other allies was a small
matter between Nahum Sokolov and the two representatives,
Pichon for France, Imperial! for Italy. From the debates in the
French senate, April 5, 6, 1921, following the interpellation
of Senator Dominique Delahaye, it subsequently appeared that
neither the Chamber of Deputies nor the Senate had ever had the
question of ratification put to them.
To those active in Zionist circles, the declaration was no
surprise: among the leaders it had been expected for many
months. It was, however, made the occasion for public rejoicing
in the Jewish and Jew-controlled gentile press,39 and mass
meetings were held in London and addressed by Sir Mark Sykes,40
Sir Herbert Samuel,41 and others prominent in politics. But the
Jewish moderates, headed by Claude G. Montefiore and David L.
Alexander, raised a dissentient voice: they feared, as at the
Basle congress,42 that the new nationalism would injure their
social rights as Englishmen. Even more they disliked being
eclipsed by Ginzberg's satellites from the ghetto. They made,
therefore, common cause with the anti-Zionists in America; and
when anti-Zionism died out there, it disappeared in England.
Meantime, in New York, changes were taking place of much
importance to Jewry. When the Kehillah was organized in 1909,43
the control rested with a group of German Jews, including Jacob
Schiff, president of Kuhn, Loeb & Co, a branch of the
Bleichroeder Mendelssohn bank,44 Isidor Strauss, Julius Sachs,
David Philipson, who, through their affiliations in Germany,
were anti-Zionists and favoured the international Jewish
policy. They maintained a ministry for foreign affairs, at
first composed of appointees of the union of American-Hebrew
congregations. The latter, through its delegates, established
an ambassadorship at Washington to act for the Jewish people on
immigration and other political matters. Subsequently the union
was given the support of the B'nai B'rith,45 whose leading
member had been appointed ambassador. " For thirty years ",
wrote an American Zionist,46 " our ambassador at Washington was
the Hon. Simon Wolf. He informed the United States government
what the Jews of this country wanted and what they were opposed
to. In Simon Wolf's opinion, the Jews were not a nationality
but a religious sect; they insisted upon being regarded solely
as Americans. Mr. Wolf spoke in the name of assimilation on
behalf of the Jews in America."
Later another more powerful group of Jews organized under the
name of the American Jewish committee and took over the
ministry of foreign affairs.47 During the Wilson administration
certain Jews appointed to the highest posts exerted so much
influence on the chief executive and members of congress as
almost to control the national policy: in particular the
Zionist Louis Brandeis of the supreme court, Bernard Baruch,
chairman of the war industries board,48 Felix and Paul Warburg
of the federal reserve, Julius Klein of the department of
commerce, and Eugene F. Meyer.49
Under Zionist influence, the Yiddish newspapers, edited by
radicals, started a campaign against the American Jewish
committee on the grounds that it was autocratic, and demanded
an American Jewish congress, elected by and responsible to the
people. " As Zionism moved forward," continues the article
quoted above, " the opposition had to recede. When the congress
is not in session, the affairs of the Jewish nation are
regulated [1917] by the inner actions committee50 and the
greater actions committee, two executive bodies the members of
which are elected by the Zionist congress."
Thus Zionism, by clever propaganda, gained the masses. But it
did not neglect to win over certain leaders of American Jewry,
by what means may be guessed. Jacob Schiff had long been
interested in the revolutionary movement in Russia and had
transferred large sums to support it through his bank, as far
back as 1905. The success therefore of the revolution in 1917,
engineered by the Zionists, could not fail to change his views.
" I believe, " he wrote Rabbi Philipson in 1918,51 " I have
heretofore explained to you the reasons which, soon after the
outbreak of the Russian revolution, have induced me to change
my former attitude towards the Zionist movement, and I have
since become more and more convinced that it was in the best
interests of our people that I did this."
Schiff had evidently shared the " blessings "52 of the Russian
revolution and quite properly gave credit where it was due. The
letter continues. " There can be no doubt that the success of
these [Zionist] endeavours will have the most healthy and
refreshing effect upon entire Israel, wherever in the world its
members may be located, and the proposition you bring forward,
to oppose these efforts, is, in my opinion, nothing less than
preposterous."
When the opposition to Zionism came to a head in America, it
found all the leading Jews on whose support it had counted
either only nominally anti-Zionist, or frankly favourable.
Rabbi David Philipson and Max Senior, who with others were
attempting to call a conference to combat it in the autumn of
1918, met with little encouragement in New York. Oscar S.
Strauss wrote:53
" I regard the holding of a conference to counteract the
activities of Zionists as distinctly unwise and harmful. I do
hope that your committee will recall its proposed action. I
make this suggestion, yea request, not as a Zionist, as I am
not affiliated with that organization, but as an American and
as a lover of our people."
An exchange of letters between Max Senior and Louis Marshall54
is more instructive.
" The reasons," wrote the latter, " which I then urged [in
declining Rabbi Philip-son's invitation] have been emphasized
by the rapid march of events. The allied armies have now swept
the Turks and the Germans out of Palestine. It is significant
that Jewish units constitute a part of the victorious army. "
" President Wilson expressed his personal views in support
of the principles laid down in the Balfour declaration. France,
Italy, and Greece have formally adopted it: there is therefore
an unanimity of sentiment on the part of the allied powers. "
" The American Jewish committee, although its members are
in the main non-Zionists, recognised the political importance
of the declaration as a factor in the effort to defeat the
central powers. Major Lionel de Rothschild, president of the
league for British Jews, informs me that that organization is
in agreement with the American Jewish committee."55
But, if Marshall pretended that the Jews should accept Zionism
in order to comply with the " unanimous sentiment of the allied
powers " who had determined to build a home for the Jews in
Palestine, he was not blind to the real reason for Zionism. His
letter continues:
" The Balfour declaration with its acceptance by the
powers, is an act of the highest diplomacy. It means both more
and less than appears on the surface. Zionism is but an
incident of a far-reaching plan: it is merely a convenient peg
on which to hang a powerful weapon."56 The letter ends with a
threat to non-Zionists: " All the protests they may make would
be futile. It would subject them individually to hateful and
concrete examples of a most impressive nature. Even if I were
disposed to combat Zionism, I would shrink from the
possibilities which might result ".
Senior's reply is direct and fearless:57
" I repudiate any connection on national, religious,
racial, or cultural grounds, with a ' national home-land for
the Jews in Palestine'. We have seen how demoralizing a divided
allegiance was to the Germans in this country. I do not pretend
to know the inside political history and intricacies of policy
of which you hint... I am not to be intimidated into silence by
either of the threats you mention... I regard the real danger
to the Jew to lie in silent acquiescence to the Zionist claims.
You recognize that the non-Zionists did not precipitate the
rupture. The break was bound to come, but the recent
Tammany-like circular to congressmen was certainly the breaking
point... I refuse to accept the Zionist coup d'etat as an
accomplished and sacred fact... Finally, you and I and the
Zionists know that Palestine offers no solution for the Jewish
question in Russia, Galicia, and Rumania. Six million Jews in
these lands cannot be removed to Palestine. I certainly have no
objection to Jews moving to Palestine, or Persia, or Patagonia,
if they can secure freedom in those lands. But emigration is
only a palliative. The Jewish question must ultimately be
worked out in Russia, Galicia, and Rumania."
Senior's fear that the " real danger to the Jews (in America)
lay in silent acquiescence to Zionist claims" has proved
justified. The tasks since set by the Zionists for American
Jewry have been heavier by far than those set by the
Egyptians.58 But the Zionists cleverly lulled any lurking
suspicions in the minds of all but a very few (including
Senior) by a fanatical appeal to nationalism and a romantic
picture of the " land overflowing with milk and honey ".
Anti-Zionism disappeared.
Then came the peace conference; the formation of the League of
Nations at Geneva;59 and the British mandate for the holy land,
over which the Jews exercised complete control in practice,
leaving to the English taxpayer the expense of civil
administration.60
Thus Zionism gained its ends: in Berlin and Petrograd by
subversive activities, in London and New York mainly by
diplomacy. Without the influence of Zionism in America during
the Wilson administration, and American money, the Balfour
declaration, obtained by the efforts of Weizmann and Sokolov,
would have remained a dead letter.
-
1. Sokolov, History of Zionism, p. 21.
2. Jesse Sampler, Guide to Zionsm, p. 63.
3. Oscar S. Straus, in a letter to Rabbi Philipson, dated New
York, Sept. 2,1918, alluding to this deal and writing in favour
of Zionism asks, "Doyouwish Palestine to be under the tyranny
of Germans, or of their brutalized tools, the Turks? ".
4. Sampter, op, cit., p. 63.
5. Ibid., p. 239.
6. Ibid., p. 63.
7. Ibid., p. 63.
8. Ibid., p. 63.
9. Supra, eh. IV.
10. Batsell, op. cit., p. 655.
11. In 1915 a conference of socialists opposed to war was held
at Zimmerwald. Exponents of the programme of international
revolution and class warfare were present in force. Ibid., p.
757. It was this year that Rosika Schwimmer (Jewess) induced
Henry Ford to sail to Europe in the famous peace ship.
12. Ibid., p. 695. The population of Russia in 1917 was one
hundred and thirty million.
13. The War of Lost Opportunities (New York, 1925), pp. 180-181.
14. Batsell, op. cit., p. 27.
15. 8 Speeches of Lenin (New York, 1928), pp. 19-26.
16. Protocol VII last par.
17. In the World War (London, 1919), pp. 216-217.
18. Cf. supra, ch. IV. Nordau's criticism: " He understands
freedom as practised in the ghetto."
19. Sokolov, History of Zionism, p. 38.
20. Ibid., p. 43.
21. Ibid., p. 44.
22. Ibid., p. 8.
23. His biographer, Shane Leslie, says " it was his Catholicism
that assisted Mark to understand the Jewish tragedy." Mark
Sykes (London, 1923), p. 269.
24. Loc. cit.
25. Sokolov II, History of Zionism, p. 29.
26. Ibid., p. 52.
27. This programme had been drafted by Gaster, Weizmann,
Bentwich, Cowen and Sokolov at the end of 1916: he. cit.
28. Ibid., p. 52.
29. Shane Leslie, p. 270.
30. Sokolov, p. 82.
31. Lloyd George's connection with the Jew Sir Basil Zaharoff
(real name Zaccharia), large shareholder in Vickers, Maxim
Ltd., munition works, should be kept in mind. For a statement
on Zaharoff at this time see Boucard, Les dessous de
I'espionnage anglais (Paris, 1929), pp. 228-234.
32. Vice-president (subsequently president) of one of the
largest chemical firms, Brunner Mond & Co, in which Chaim
Weizmann was also associated. Sassoon, another Jew, was closely
connected with Mond in British politics.
33. The mineral deposits of the Jordan valley, for which Alfred
Mond (the late Lord Melchett) obtained the monopoly in 1929.
34. " The geographical position of Palestine, as the connecting
link between three continents, if held by the English and the
Jews, both shopkeepers, offers the opportunity of making the
land of Israel the great emporium of "East and West": Bernard
Rosenblatt, Social Zionism, pp. 145, 146.
35. Presumably Sir Arthur J. Balfour himself.
36. The text was drafted under Ginzberg's directions by the
Jewish political committee composed of: Sokolov (chairman),
Weizmann, Leopold Kessler, Cowen, Bentwich, Albert M. Hyamson,
Simon Marks (secretary), Sacher, Israel Sieff, Leon Simon,
Ettinger and Folkpvskii.
37. Ahad-ha-am, Essays on Judaism and Zionism, tr. by Leon
Simon, p. 15.
38. Supra, ch. I.
39. " But we all know how the declaration was interpreted at
the time of its publication, and how much exaggeration many of
our workers and writers have tried to introduce into it."
Ahad-ha-am, loc. cit.
40. Shane Leslie, p. 270.
41. In his speech at the demonstration of Dec. 2,1917, at the
London opera-house, Samuel said that he " had stood for Zionism
not only in the cabinet, but outside it". Sokolov, p. 47.
42. Supra, ch. III. "
43. Supra, ch. II.
44. Affiliated with the big " D " banks in Germany: Deutsche
Bank, Disconto Gesellschaft, Dresdener Bank, Darmstadter Bank.
45. Supra, ch. III.
46. Louis Lipsky: The Maccabean (New York, June, July, 1917),
p. 276.
47. Loc. cit., Presumably at the beginning of the Wilson
administra tion.
48. Baruch stated publicly that during the war in his official
capacity he " probably exercised more power than any other man
in the country ".
49. Present head of the Federal Reserve Board.
50. Supra, ch. V.
51. Letter of the late Jacob H. Schiff to Rabbi David
Philipson, dated: Bar Harbor, Sept. 5,1918.
52. Supra, ch. V.
53. Letter of Oscar S. Strauss to Rabbi David Philipson,
Beechwood, Avenue Avondale, Cincinnati, Ohio, dated New York,
Sept. 2, 1918.
54. Born in Syracuse, N. Y., 1856; graduated from Columbia law
school; became partner in law firm of Guggenheimer, Untermeyer
& Marshall; appointed, in 1908, chairman of N. Y. state
immigration commission; acted as counsel for Gov. Sulzer in his
impeachment. For twenty years, chairman of the commission on
amendment, N. Y. Bar Association. Brought influence to bear on
President Taft and Senate to abrogate treaty with Russia, on
account of treatment of Jews in Russia. President of Jewish
delegation at the peace conference. Served on the board of
arbitration (or beth-din) which settled the cloth
ing strike of 1919, in New York. Took a prominent part in
Zionist movement; headed many Jewish charities, including the
American Jewish relief commission which raised seventy-five
million dollars " for Jewish war sufferers ". Trustee of
Syracuse university; president of N. Y. state college of
forestry. Died in Zurich, Sept. 11, 1929. (Extract from press
obituary notices on day following his death).
55. Letter of Louis Marshall to Max Senior, dated New York,
Sept. 26, 1918.
56. Italics are ours.
57. Letter of Max Senior to Louis Marshall, dated Washington,
Sept. 30, 1918.
58. The taxes and "-contributions " for " rebuilding Palestine
" have amounted to $100,000,000. Infra, ch. VI.
59. " The League of Nations is an old Jewish idea." Sampler,
Guide to Zionism, p. 21. Leon Simon, in a draft for the
Palestine mandate written in March 1918, said: " It is fitting
that one of the powers should act for the League as sovereign
of Palestine during the period that must elapse before the
Jewish nation can grow to full maturity."
60. The construction of roads and the maintainance of an
adequate police have been the two largest items.
------------------------------------
redux
But look at this one:
-------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
2.4.1 Text And Commentary Of The Protocols
------------------------------------------
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion may be briefly
described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a
secret brotherhood. Whatever may be the truth about their
authorship-and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of
bitter dispute-there can be no doubt that the world society to
which they look forward is nothing more or less than a world
police state.
The book in which the Protocols were first embodied was
published by Professor Sergyei A. Nilus in Russia in 1905, a
copy being received in the British Museum on August 10th, 1906.
Professor Nilus's concern was to expose what he believed to be
a ruthless, cold-blooded conspiracy for the destruction of
Christian civilization. Earlier, in August and September, 1903,
the Russian newspaper Snamia had published the Protocols, and
they are also believed to have been published in the winter of
1902/1903 in the newspaper Moskowskija Wiedomosti. They
remained unknown outside Russia, however, until after the
Bolshevik Revolution, when Russian emigrants brought Nilus's
book to North America and Germany.
The similarity between what was forecast in the Protocols and
the fate which had befallen Russia under the Bolsheviks was so
marked that, after these long years of neglect, they rapidly
became one of the most famous (or notorious) documents in the
world.
In Bolshevik Russia, the penalty for their mere possession
was death. It remains so to this day, both in the Soviet Union
and in the Satellite countries. Outside the Iron Curtain, in
South Africa possession of the Protocols is also forbidden by
law, although the penalty is less drastic.
As a result of their rapidly growing fame, numerous attempts
were made to discredit the Protocols as a forgery. But it was
not until 1933 that the Jews resorted to legal action. On 26th
June, 1933, the Federation of Jewish Communities of Switzerland
and the Berne Jewish Community brought an action against five
members of the Swiss National Front, seeking a judgment that
the Protocols were a forgery and a prohibition of their
publication.1 The procedure of the Court was astounding, the
provisions of the Swiss Civil Code being deliberately set
aside. Sixteen witnesses called by the plaintiffs were heard,
but only one of the forty witnesses called by the defendants
was allowed a hearing. The judge allowed the plaintiffs to
appoint two private stenographers to keep the register of
proceedings during the hearing of their witnesses, instead of
entrusting the task to a Court official.
In view of these and similar irregularities, it was not
surprising that, after the case had lasted just on two years,
the Court pronounced the Protocols to be a forgery and
demoralizing literature. The decision was given on 14th May,
1935, but it was announced in the Jewish Press before it was
delivered by the Court.
On 1st November, 1937, the Swiss Court of Criminal Appeal
quashed this judgment in its entirety. Jewish propagandists,
however, still declare that the Protocols have been "proved" to
be a forgery.
It was natural that the Jews should try to discredit the
Protocols, for their growing fame was focusing more public
attention on other revealing utterances.
In Disraeli's The Life of Lord George Bentinck, written in
1852, there occurs this quotation:
"The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last
outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An
insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy,
against religion and property. Destruction of the Semitic
principle, extirpation of the Jewish religion, whether in the
Mosaic or the Christian form, the natural equality of men and
the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the Secret
Societies which form Provisional Governments and men of Jewish
Race are found at the head of every one of them. The people of
God co-operate with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of
property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and
chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of
Europe; and all this because they wish to destroy that
ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and
whose tyranny they can no longer endure."
Max Nordau, a Jew, speaking at the Zionist Congress at Basle
in August 1903, made this astonishing "prophesy":
"Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing
you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the
Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future
world war, the peace conference, where with the help of England
a free and Jewish Palestine will be created."
Walter Rathenau, the Jewish banker behind the Kaiser, writing
in the German Weiner Frei Presse, December 24th 1912, said:
"Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others,
govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their
successors from their entourage."
Confirmation of Rathenau's statement came twenty years later
in 1931 when Jean Izoulet, a prominent member of the Jewish
Alliance Israelite Universelle, wrote in his Paris la Capitale
des Religions:
"The meaning of the history of the last century is that
today 300 Jewish financiers, all Masters of Lodges, rule the
world."
The London Jewish Chronicle, on April 4th, 1919, declared:
"There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the
fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the
ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the
finest ideals of Judaism."
On March 15th, 1923, the Jewish World asserted:
"Fundamentally Judaism is Anti-Christian."
These and many similar assertions from Jewish sources were
damaging enough from the Jewish point of view. Taken in
conjunction with the Protocols, with which more and more people
were becoming familiar, they were damning.
The attitude of many people whose concern over the growing
attack on Christian civilization was rapidly increasing was
summed up by the late Henry Ford senior, the founder of the
world-famous motor manufacturing company. In an interview
published in the New York World on February 17th, 1921, Mr.
Ford declared:
"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is
that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years
old, and have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY
FIT IT NOW."
Those who, like Henry Ford, could see that "they fit it now"
only sixteen years after Nilus's first publication of the
Protocols, naturally tended to concentrate their attention on
the relatively recent phenomenon of Bolshevism. Few of them
then understood the equally dangerous, if more insidious,
danger of internationalism.
Now, however, more than half a century after Nilus's
publication of the Protocols, the reality of that danger must
be crystal clear to anybody who views the world situation
objectively.
The Protocols are full of references to a "super-Government".
Protocol VI, for example, states:
"In every possible way we must develop the significance
of our super-Government by representing it as the Protector and
Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us."
That is exactly the way in which the United Nations
organization, set up at the end of the second World War, is
represented to those who voluntarily submit to it.
It is exactly the way the various United Nations special
agencies-U.N.E.S.C.O. (U.N. Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization); I.L.O. (International Labor
Organization); W.H.O. (World Health Organization); F.A.O. (Food
and Agriculture Organization); Commission on Human Rights;
Genocide Convention, etc.-are represented.
For some years there has been in existence an international
organization calling itself the World Association of
Parliamentarians for World Government, which pursues the same
objective as that of another long-established international
organization, Federal Union. This body does not disguise the
fact that the United Nations, by means of a few relatively
minor changes in its Charter, could be transformed virtually
overnight into a World Government.
There has long been agitation for the creation of a World
Police Force. This would enable the United Nations
super-Government to function as the master of an all-powerful
World Police State, and the closing years of the 1950's have
seen the agitators for a World Police Force come close to
achieving their objective. The U.N. Emergency Force,
established after the Suez crisis of 1956, has been openly
regarded as a "pilot scheme".
Should the few changes in the Charter necessary to transform
the U.N. into a super-Government be made, it will have in the
special agencies readymade Ministries of Education (or
Propaganda), Labor, Health, Food and Agriculture, "Justice" etc.
Can it be an accident that these things are so accurately
fore-shadowed in the Protocols?
The full-scale World super-Government is not the only, nor
perhaps the most immediate, danger. It is obvious to everyone
that the nations of the East are being herded into subjection
under the dominance of the Soviet Union. But what of the
nations of the West? Are they really the "free nations" which
they are popularly supposed to be?
Far from it! They are being herded into the same sort of pen
as are the nations of the East under Communism-and often on the
pretext that this is the only way in which they can save
themselves from Communism. Late in 1957, the process had gone
far enough to be given an official name. That name was the
"policy of inter-dependence".
The nations of the West are being brought under international
control at political, military and economic levels. They are
rapidly in process of becoming controlled also on the social
level. All alike are being told that their only hope lies in
the surrender of national sovereignty.
National Parliaments must give way to such bodies as the
Council of Europe or the Atlantic Council. National Forces must
be submerged in such bodies as the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (N.A.T.O.), the Baghdad Pact or the South-East
Asia Treaty Organization (S.E.A.T.O.), so that no nation has
control over its own means of defense. National economies must
be submerged in such bodies as the Organization for European
Economic Co-operation (O.E.E.C.), the European Payments Union
(E.P.U.) or the World Bank, so that no nation may control its
own economic destiny.
Even on the social level, individual national distinctions
must disappear. For example, under the "Common Market" Treaty
which unites six European nations on the economic plane,
provision is made for the "equalization of social policies".
And strenuous efforts have been made to herd other European
nations, Great Britain among them, into this same pen in the
associated European Free Trade Area.
In 1934, when the leader of the British Labor Party (Mr.
Clement Attlee) told the party's annual conference:
"We are deliberately putting loyalty to a world order
above loyalty to our own country", he was widely execrated.
Twenty-three years of propaganda, however, leave their mark,
and when, in 1957, a Conservative Prime Minister of Britain
told the British people that they must surrender some of their
national sovereignty to an unknown international cabal,
scarcely a voice was raised in protest. At the close of 1957
there was an official declaration of the British Government's
support for the plan which was foreshadowed in the Protocols
over sixty years ago. The Earl of Gosford, Joint Parliamentary
Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, said in the House
of Lords on 7th November, 1957:
"Her Majesty's Government is fully in agreement with
World Government. We agree that this must be the goal, and that
every step that is humanly possible must be taken to reach that
goal."
All over the world, "federation", "integration",
"regionalization" and "inter-dependence" are the order of the
day. All this is foreshadowed in the Protocols, published more
than half-a-century ago by Sergyei Nilus, which, we are told,
are a forgery.
Can all this be coincidence? Could any forger be so
prescient? Or are the Protocols what Nilus and many others
believed them to be-the blueprint of a conspiracy to destroy
Christian civilization and place the whole world under the
domination of a small, select cabal ?
The British Museum Library stamp
The British Museum Library stamp
????????? ????????. ??????, 28 ???????? 1905 ????
The Subtitle page from the 2nd edition (1905) with the words:
Passed by the Censor Moscow. 28th of September, 1905.
NOTES
I - "AGENTUR" and "The Political"
There are two words in this translation which are unusual,
the words "Agentur" and "political" used as substantives.
"Agentur" appears to be adopted from the original text and it
means the whole body of agents and agencies directed by the
Elders, whether members of the tribe or their Gentile tools.
By "the Political" Mr. Marsden means, not exactly the "body
politic" but the entire machinery of politics.
II-The Symbolic Snake of Judaism
Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of
Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols
Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:
According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism,
Solomon and other Jewish learned men had already, in 929 B.C.,
thought out a theoretical scheme for the peaceful conquest of
the whole universe by Zion.
As the course of history unfolded, this scheme was
elaborated in detail and completed by later generations of men
who had been initiated into their secrets. These learned men
decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with
the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent
those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish
administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the
Jewish people-the administration was always kept secret, even
from the Jewish nation itself. As this Snake penetrated into
the hearts of the nations which it encountered it undermined
and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is
foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly
adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to
run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by
this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has
encircled it-and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has
encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using
every endeavor to subdue the other countries by economic
conquest.
The return of the head of the snake to Zion can only be
accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe
has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic
crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there
shall have been brought about spiritual demoralization and
moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women
masquerading as French, Italians, etc. Their example is the
surest method of encouraging licentiousness among the leaders
of the nations.
A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as
follows:-Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece,
where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started
eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in
Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C. The third in Madrid
in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris
about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from
1841 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in
Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in
St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under
the date of 1881.
All these states which the Snake traversed have had the
foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its
apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic
conditions England and Germany are spared, but only till the
conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at
present (i.e., 1905) all its efforts are concentrated. The
further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but
arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieff and
Odessa.
It is now well known to us to what extent the latter
cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race.
Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake's course
before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before
the occurrence of the "Young Turk"-i.e., Jewish- Revolution in
Turkey).
III-The term GOYIM
The term "Goyim", meaning Gentiles or non-Jews, is used
throughout the Protocols and is retained by Mr. Marsden.
-------------------------------------
redux
Yep. You are ALWAYS right, right?
But have you considered this?
-----------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
2.1 How The Protocols Came To Russia
------------------------------------
The word " protocol "i was used to signify a fly-leaf pasted at
the top of an official document, bearing either the opening
formula or a summary of the contents for convenient reference.
The original draft of a treaty was usually pasted on in this
way, that the signatories might check the correctness of the
engrossed copy before signing. The draft itself being based on
the discussion at the conference, the word came to mean also
the minutes of the proceedings.
In this instance " the protocols " mean the " draft of the plan
of action " of the Jewish leaders. There have been many such
drafts at different periods in Jewish history since the
dispersion, but few of them have come into general circulation.
In all, the principles and morality are as old as the tribe. By
way of illustration we give an instance which occurred in the
fifteenth century.
In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand
Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice,
when a Spanish law threatened expulsion.2 This was the reply:
" Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter
in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you
are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as
yourselves. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the
following:
1. As for what you say that the King of Spain 3 obliges you
to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.
2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of
your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil,
little by little, the Christians of theirs.
3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives:
make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take
away Christians' lives.
4. As for what you say of their destroying your syna gogues:
make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may
destroy their churches.
5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange
that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they
always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians
under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on
them.
6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because
you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you
will reach the actuality of power.
(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE."
The protocols given to the world by Nilus are only the latest
known edition of the Jewish leaders programme. The story of how
the latter came into general circulation is an interesting one.
In 1884 the daughter of a Russian general, Mile. Justine
Glinka, was endeavouring to serve her country in Paris by
obtaining political information, which she communicated to
General Orgevskii4 in St. Petersburg. For this purpose she
employed a Jew, Joseph Schorst,5 member of the Miz-raim Lodge
in Paris. One day Schorst offered to obtain for her a document
of great importance to Russia, on payment of 2,500 francs. This
sum being received from St. Petersburg was paid over and the
document handed to Mile. Glinka.6
She forwarded the French original, accompanied by a Russian
translation, to Orgevskii, who in turn handed it to his chief,
General Cherevin, for transmission to the Tsar. But Cherevin,
under obligation to wealthy Jews, refused to transmit it,
merely riling it in the archives.7
Meantime there appeared in Paris certain books on Russian court
life8 which displeased the Tsar, who ordered his secret police
to discover their authorship. This was falsely attributed,
perhaps with malicious intent,9 to Mile. Glinka, and on her
return to Russia she was banished to her estate in Orel. To the
marechal de noblesse of this district, Alexis Sukhotin, Mile.
Glinka gave a copy of the Protocols. Sukhotin showed the
document to two friends, Stepanov and Nilus; the former had it
printed and circulated privately in 1897; the second, Professor
Sergius A. Nilus, published it for the first time in
Tsarskoe-Tselo (Russia) in 1901, in a book entitled The Great
Within the Small. Then, about the same time, a friend of Nilus,
G. Butmi, also brought it out and a copy was deposited in the
British Museum on August 10, 1906.
Meantime, through Jewish members10 of the Russian police,
minutes of the proceedings of the Basle congress11 in 1897 had
been obtained and these were found to correspond with the
Protocols.12
In January 1917, Nilus had prepared a second edition, revised
and documented, for publication. But before it could be put on
the market, the revolution of March 1917 had taken place, and
Kerenskii, who had succeeded to power, ordered the whole
edition of Nilus's book to be destroyed. In 1924, Prof. Nilus
was arrested by the Cheka in Kiev, imprisoned, and tortured; he
was told by the Jewish president of the court, that this
treatment was meted out to him for " having done them
incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols ". Released for a
few months, he was again led before the G. P. U. (Cheka), this
time in Moscow and confined. Set at liberty in February 1926,
he died in exile in the district of Vladimir on January 13, 1929.
A few copies of Nilus's second edition were saved and sent to
other countries where they were published: in Germany, by
Gottfreid zum Beek (1919); in England, by The Britons (1920);
in France, by Mgr. Jouin in La Revue Internationale des
Sociétés Secrètes, and by Urbain Gohier in La Vieille France;
in the United States, by Small, Maynard & Co. (Boston 1920),
and by The Beckwith Co (New York 1921). Later, editions
appeared in Italian, Russian, Arabic, and even in Japanese.
Such is the simple story of how these Protocols reached Russia
and thence came into general circulation.
Mr. Stepanov's deposition'3 relative to it is here given as
corroboration.
" In 1895, my neighbour in the district of Toula, Major
(retired) Alexis Sukhotin, gave me a manuscript copy of the
Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion. He told me that a lady of
his acquaintance, whose name he did not mention, residing in
Paris, had found it at the house of a friend, a Jew. Before
leaving Paris, she had secretly translated it and had brought
this one copy to Russia and given it to Sukhotin.
"At first I mimeographed this translation, but finding it
difficult to read, I resolved to have it printed, making no
mention of the date, town, or printer's name. In this I was
helped by Arcadii Ippolitovich Kelepovskii, who at that time
was chief of the household of Grand Duke Sergius.
He gave the document to be printed by the district printing
press. This took place in 1897. Sergius Nilus inserted these
Protocols in his work and added his own commentary. (Signed)
PHILIP PETROVICH STEPANOV."
Formerly Procurator of the Synod of Moscow, Chamberlain, Privy
Councillor, and (in 1897) Chief of the Moscow Kursk Railway in
the town of Orel. April 17, 1927.
Witnessed by PRINCE DIMITRI GALITZIN. President of the Russian
Colony of Emigrants at Stari Fontag.
-
1. From Greek, protos (first) + holla (glue).
2. The reply is found in the sixteenth century Spanish book, La
Silva Curiosa, by Julio-Iniguez de Medrano (Paris, Orry, 1608),
on pages 156 and 157, with the following explanation: " This
letter following was found in the archives of Toledo by the
Hermit of Salamanca, (while) searching the ancient records of
the kingdoms of Spain; and, as it is expressive and remarkable,
I wish to write it here."-vide, photostat facing page 80.
3. Ferdinand.
4. At that time Secretary to the Minister of the Interior,
General Cherevin.
5. Alias Schapiro, whose father had been sentenced in London,
two years previous, to ten years penal servitude for
counterfeiting.
6. Schorst fled to Egypt where, according to French police
archives, he was murdered.
7. On his death in 1896, he willed a copy of his memoirs
containing the Protocols to Nicholas II.
8. Published under the pseudonym " Count Vassilii", their real
author was Mme. Juliette Adam, using material furnished by
Princess Demidov-San Donate, Princess Radzivill, and other
Russians.
9. Among the Jews in the Russian secret service in Paris was
Maniulov, whose odious character is drawn by M. Pateologue,
Memoires.
10. Notably Eno Azev and Efrom. The latter, formerly a rabbi,
died in 1925 in a monastery in Serbia, where he had taken
refuge; he used to tell the monks that the protocols were but a
small part of Jewish plans for ruling the world and a feeble
expression of their hatred of the gentiles.
11. Supra, Part I.
12. The Russian government had learned that at meetings of the
B'nai Brith in New-York in 1893-94, Jacob Schiff (supra, 52,
53) had been named chairman of the committee on the revol
utionary movement in Russia.
13. The translation is the author's; appended facing page 81. a
photostat of the original is
--------------------------------
redux
Good.
We need this kind of disinformation.
But...
What about this?
-----------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
Publisher's Foreword
--------------------
The Publishers are pleased to be able to present a new edition
of Waters Flowing Eastward, considered by many to be the best
and most complete work on the famous Protocols of the Sages of
Zion. To stress the fact that the realization of the Protocols
means the elimination of the rule of Christ the King, it has
been thought well to Subtitle the book The War Against the
Kingship of Christ.
We are omitting some of the illustrations included in the
earlier editions, but we are adding three important Appendices.
Appendix I is the reproduction of a large portion of an article
which appeared in The Australian Social Crediter, March and
April, 1946. It shows the steady advance of the plans outlined
in the Protocols and emphasizes the importance of the financial
factor. Appendix II treats of the Berne Trials, in particular
of the false statements circulated about the decision given in
the Second Trial. This Appendix is the translation of an
extract from a work by the late H. de Vries de Heekelingen, one
of the ablest writers on this question.
The Third Appendix contains some information about the Jews who
hold leading positions in Russia and the Satellite Countries,
as well as in U.N.O. and U.S.A., and about the persecution of
Catholics in these countries and in Palestine. The information
is taken from Free Britain (August 20, September 10, September
24, 1950), The Tablet (Brooklyn) and Social Credit (Canada).
Several arguments against the authenticity of the Protocols are
examined in the book. It may be well to mention here a
completely new argument for their authenticity. In 1937, a
Russian ex-officer of the Czarist Intelligence Service asked to
see a friend of ours. The Russian ex-officer was accompanied,
on the occasion of the meeting, by a man well and favourably
known to our friend. The ex-officer informed our friend and his
wife that, in 1897, he had been called from Washington, where
he was working for the Czarist government, and sent to Basle,
Switzerland, where the first Zionist Congress was being held
that year. He was given a small detachment of picked secret
service men. While the Jews were in secret conclave, his men
staged a sham fire and dashed into the room shouting Fire!
Fire! In the ensuing confusion he made his way quickly to the
President's or Lecturer's table and took possession of all the
papers that were on it. These papers contained the originals of
the Protocols.
This Russian officer escaped out of Russia in 1917 and lived
mostly in Paris. He was an old man in 1937. Needless to say our
friend's veracity and reliability are unquestioned.
To the information taken from Free Britain must be added the
following from Know Your Enemy, by Robert H. Williams:
"Mr. Ashberg, who was known throughout the banking world as
a Jewish financier at the Nya Banken in Sweden before the
Bolshevik Revolution, and was reported by Edgar Sisson as
having arrived in Russia two months after the successful
"October Revolution," is still in Russia and is the banker for
the U.S.S.R. The London Star, September 6, 1948, reported a
visit by Ashberg to Switzerland 'for secret meetings with Swiss
government officials and banking executives.' Diplomatic
circles describe Mr. Ashberg as the Soviet Banker who advanced
large sums to Lenin and Trotski in 1917. At the time of the
revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotski money to form and equip
the first unit of the Red Army. A spokesman of the Soviet
Legation in Berne said 'Mr. Ashberg's visit will be private. He
has property in Switzerland' ... Note that Banker-Communist
Ashberg was even permitted to own property, and in a capitalist
nation. Gentile bankers-competitors of Jewish finance were
liquidated as capitalists soon after the revolution." (1)
In The A.D.L. Bulletin of January, 1953, published by the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, there appeared an
article entitled "The Protocols and the Prague Trial." The
article began by asserting that the Protocols had been proved
to have been "fabricated" under the Russian Czars.
That statement is now seen to be doubly false from the
testimony above adduced.
The main purpose of the A.D.L. article was to attempt to show
that the Protocols, in an astounding number of ways "were the
source book for the Prague purge trials." That is very
interesting in view of the fact that the Minister of Justice in
charge of the Prague "Anti-Semitic" trials was a Jew, Stefan
Rais. He, of course, was acquainted with the Protocols from the
Jewish side, and he was only one of the multitude of Jews who
are in control behind the Iron Curtain. One of them was F.
Herczog, who replaced as Minister of State-planning in Hungary
the "purged" Jew, Zolton Vas. From Gothic Ripples of the 25th
May 1953, we learn in addition that Beria, though officially
known as a Georgian, is popularly believed to be either
half-Jewish or of Jewish descent. ... In Poland the Jew
Stanislau Radiciewiez, is still Chief of the Secret Police, and
the Jew, Gomulka, is still in prison. The Jew, Pavel F. Yudin,
has been appointed Political Adviser to the Soviet Control
Commission in Germany...
The London Daily Express 1st May, 1953, says that there is to
be a new purge of "incompetents " in East Germany. It is to be
carried out by Hermann Axen, who according to The Jewish
Chronicle (London), of December 5th, 1952, is a Jew.
We thank the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith for
informing us that Jews are using the Protocols against Jews
behind the Iron Curtain.
1. Op. cit. p. 33.
PREFACE
It has been frequently observed that our civilization follows
the course of the sun westward: from Greece to Rome, from
Scandinavia and Germany to England, France and Spain, from
Europe to America. It looks towards the west for fresh lands
where it may build nobler cities and create more perfect forms
of life, unhampered by the trammels of the past. It may be said
that the west stands for independence of thought, free
expression, and representative government: these principles are
involved in the western conception of progress.
Beneath this great westward flow of our civilization, there are
undercurrents moving eastward. These are impelled by a spirit
which looks back to the east, to the days of tyrant and slave,
of luxury and misery, and incidentally the suppression of
western culture. This spirit is retrogressive, though often
calling itself "Progress," and its ways are devious. But the
currents for which it is responsible are broad, deep and
violent in their effect.
The following pages are designed to cast light on these eastern
undercurrents which have undermined western states. Political
problems which most governments prefer to ignore have been
commented upon in detail. Special attention has been given to a
struggle going on underground, and which is perhaps of greater
significance than the so-called perils to western civilization,
such as the Yellow Peril or the Black Peril, where every move
is watched and understood not only by ther rulers in each
nation, but also by the governed themselves as a whole.
In brief, an attempt has been made to place in broad relief the
inner structure of a system which has produced and still
foments not only racial enmity, but also has even undermined
certain civilizations and overthrown established national
governments.
-----------------------------------------
redux
I like your style.
But what about this?
----------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
1.2 The Jewish Community: Its Spirit And Organisation
-----------------------------------------------------
In studying the Jewish people, special attention must be given
to the Jewish community. This peculiar social order has for
twenty centuries impressed its indelible mark on every one of
its members in every quarter of the globe; uncrushed by
pressure from without, it has administered its affairs
according to its own arbitrary laws, often in defiance and to
the detriment of the government of the land. The authority of
the Jewish leaders, originally derived from the ten
commandments delivered to Moses, l had already in the time of
Augustus been widely extended 2 by a learned but unscrupulous
priesthood 3 over an ignorant, superstitious people. In that
age, while a struggle was going on between two rival sects,
Pharisees 4 and Sadducees, 5 certain political clubs 6 were
formed which concealed under a religious mask the grasping aims
of a clique. 7
These clubs were not slow to take advantage of their country's
misfortunes. A few years later, during the siege of Jerusalem
by Vespasian, they won, by the betrayal of the Jewish cause,
the favour of the Roman conqueror, 8 and were subsequently
entrusted by the imperial government with the administration of
Palestine. 9 Moreover, with the sack of Jerusalem, the
destruction of the temple, and the death of the patriotic
leaders, the common people found themselves utterly dependent,
in spiritual as well as civil matters, upon these same
self-styled societies of the learned, who alone possessed the
secrets of the priesthood and copies of the sacred texts. By
interpreting, altering, and augmenting the rules and ritual
these texts contained, and by a system of espionage and
assassination, 10 the new rulers established a strict control
over the daily life of their co-religionists. Thus having taken
hold of the Jewish people through the medium of the Roman
authority, this clique easily placed its laws above the ten
commandments, and formed a government whose control over its
subjects was absolute. 11 This government became henceforth
known as the Kahal. 12
The dispersion of the Jews which followed in 135 A.D., instead
of destroying the Kahal, served on the contrary to set it on a
new and firmer basis, on which it has continued ever since.
Wherever Jewish emigrants settled, 13 they founded communities
apart under the direction of the fraternities, and held to the
precepts of the Talmud. 14 Each community had its
representative, its rabbi, its synagogue: it was a miniature
Kahal. The different aims of these communities always found
themselves intimately related with those of the central body
upon which their existence depended.
For if the ruling clique or caste had begun by grinding down
its own race,"it now saw that, by drafting them into its
organization, it could exploit the gentiles on a far grander
scale." The number of fraternities was increased by the
addition of trade unions, every trade in which the Jews engaged
being represented. To strengthen its control and to advance the
interests of the Jews as a whole, it developed and perfected
that system of espionage which it still maintains.
It sent agents 17 to watch over Jewish affairs at police
stations, and, when opportunity offered, distribute gifts to
the employees. Other agents were posted at the doors of shops,
hotels, business houses, lawcourts, and even in the private
households of government officials. These trained agents had
each a special field to cover: police, export, import,
exchange, government supplies, lawsuits, etc.
The duty of an agents assigned to lawcourts was to keep
constantly in touch with the proceedings, or with the official,
meet the petitioners and, when practicable, 18 fix the sum they
must pay for a favourable judgment. This concluded, the agent
took all necessary steps, and often succeeded in obtaining a
decision contrary to justice. But in every case, the first duty
of the agent was to note all errors and irregularities
committed by the court, and all scandals brought out in the
course of trial: these, reported and carefully recorded in the
files of the Kahal, could be used as weapons against any person
involved, who might later wish to act contrary to Jewish
interests. Thus the order derived strength from three sources:
advance information on trade conditions, bribery, and blackmail.
It is quite easy to understand the reasons of the concentration
of trade in the hands of the Jews, wherever they have settled
in sufficient numbers. For if on the one hand the individual
Jew is the slave of the Kahal, his submission on the other hand
is rewarded by its support in his struggle with non-Jewish
competitors. He can count on the immediate help of his
fraternity, and where necessary of the whole organization, and
thus is assured of the victory over any single gentile.
The teaching in the synagogue incited its following to a
thorough exploitation of their gentile neighbours, care only
being taken not to excite hostility to the extent of
endangering the whole community. This doctrine, popular from
the start, was eventually embodied in its most concrete form in
a book of the Talmud, called the Shulchan Aruk. A few
quotations will suffice to show its character: 19
"When a Jew has a gentile in his clutches, another Jew may
go to the same gentile, lend him money and in his turn deceive
him, so that the gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a
gentile (according to our law) belongs to no one, and the first
Jew that passes has the full right to seize it." 20
"When a Jew makes a deal with a gentile, and another Jew
comes up and deceives the gentile no matter in what manner,
whether he give him false measure or overcharge him, then both
Jews must share between them the profits thus sent by Jehovah."
21
"Although it is not a direct obligation for a Jew to kill a
gentile with whom he lives in peace, yet, in no case, is he
allowed to save a gentile's life." 22
"It is always a meritorious deed to get hold of a gentile's
possessions." 23
"Marriages taking place among gentiles have no binding
strength, i.e. their cohabitation is just as the coupling of
horses, therefore their children do not stand as humanly
related to their parents." 24
Of the spirit which taught that all non-Jews were animals 25 to
be stripped of their property for the benefit of Jewry, and
which united the community in a common aim and a common hatred;
of the Shulchan Aruk which transmitted this aim and this hatred
from generation to generation, Jewish leaders of the last fifty
years have written : 26
" The Shulchan Aruk is not the book that we have chosen for
our guide, but the book that has been made our guide, whether
we would or not, by force of historical development: because
this book, just as it is in its present form, with all its most
uncouth sections, was the book that best suited the spirit of
our people, their condition and their needs, in those
generations in which they accepted it as binding on themselves
and their descendants. If we proclaim that this is not our law,
we shall be proclaiming a falsehood; this is our law, couched
in the only form which was possible in the middle ages, just as
the Talmud is our law in the form which it took in the last
days of the ancient world, just as the Bible is our law in the
form which it took while the Jews still lived as a nation on
their own land. The three books are but three milestones on the
road of a single development, that of the spirit of the Jewish
nation."
A Jewish community, in the midst of a gentile population on
which it preyed, depended for its success on two things: the
absolute subordination of its members and the secrecy of its
proceedings. The Kahal concealed its activities from the
outside world under the guise of religion. " The Jews were
loyal subjects like their neighbours, but to them faith was
life, and they were constantly preoccupied with the observance
of their ritual ", it told the world. But this was not a
sufficient screen. As in all secret organizations there are
traitors and renegades whatever the penalty. The Kahal was
obliged to shroud itself in mystery and mysticism, 27 even from
its members. The multiplicity of the ritual laws, the
voluminous civil code, the secret instructions of the
fraternities, the continuance of obsolete forms, all served to
create such a confusion that no non-Jew confronted with the
documents could distinguish what was fundamental from what was
prolix ritual or irrelevant. 28 The general scheme of the
Kahal, which has been in operation since the second century A.
D., remains in force to this day. Its essential characteristics
may be outlined as follows:
a) The council of elders or geronsia, 29 presided over by a
patriarch or exilarch. Its functions were purely formal; it
represented the Jews in official relations with foreign
governments, acted as their spokesman when they wished to
arouse public sentiment in their favour, but had no
directresponsibility in the secret government whose existence
it served to conceal. Composed of leading members of the
fraternities, it could discuss at secret meetings questions of
general interest, leaving their practical solution to the
fraternities.
b) The tribunal or beth-din. 30
c) The fraternities.
The beth-din decided all lawsuits and differences arising
between individual Jews, and between members and the Kahal
itself. It existed in all localities where there were Jews,
catered to their commercial needs, and had final jurisdiction
in both civil and religious matters. It alone was competent to
interpret the spiritual laws of the Talmud. To illustrate the
character of this court, the following paragraphs from the
Talmudic code 31 may be given:
" No Jew may appeal for justice to any court or judiciary
other than the Jewish tribunal. This holds even when the laws
of the country bearing on the question at issue agree with the
Jewish laws, and when the two parties are willing to submit
their differences to the former. Whoever breaks this injunction
shall be outlawed; 32 his offence is equivalent to contempt and
violation of the law of Moses.
" The beth-din judges cases involving loans, debts,
marriages, legacies, gifts, damages, interest, etc.
" Although the beth-din has no right to fine a thief or
looter, it may inflict the indoui on him until he makes full
restitution. It may inflict fines for the infraction of rules
as prescribed in the Talmud.
" When the beth-din notices that the nation is given to
disorders, 33 it may, without confirmation by the Jewish
authorities, impose fines, death-sentences, and other
penalties; and in this connection it may waive the production
of testimony to prove the guilt of the accused. Where the
latter is a person of influence in the country, the beth-din
may use the legal machinery of the country to punish him. His
property may be declared outside the protection of the law
(guefker), and he himself may be done away with as
circumstances require."
It would be erroneous to suppose that all suits between Jews
are tried by the beth-din. In many circumstances, and
especially in thorny cases where the Jewish law is contrary to
common sense, because the form and the terms do not agree with
justice and conscience, the case is tried not by the judges of
the beth-din, called dayans, but by a special court composed of
persons chosen for their knowledge of business practice or
other special reasons.
The explanation of the mass of lawsuits between Jews before
non-Jewish courts is as follows. For the most part, these have
to do with drafts presented for payment and drawn on Jews who
have incurred penalties at the hands of the beth-din. The laws
of the country are thus used to execute the decisions of the
Jewish tribunal. The beth-din makes a practice of binding the
two parties in a suit submitted for its decision, by having
them sign blanks before the trial. If, afterward, the party who
has lost the case refuses to abide by the decision, the blank
bearing his signature is converted into a draft and put into
circulation.
Turning to the fraternities which are the sinews of the
organization, one finds their outward form strictly innocuous.
The rules are nearly all on the same model, and fix the annual
dues, the place and date for the regular meetings, the duties
and obligations of members, and the penalties if disregarded;
the latter range from small fines to expulsion from the
fraternity. A member expelled from a fraternity found himself
cut off from the community and generally died an outcast. Each
fraternity has a religious or charitable purpose, connected
with such worthy objects as the following:
a) Reading from the sacred texts, 34
b) Burial of the dead,
c) Ransoming of prisoners,
d) Free loans, help for poor girls, aid for the sick, clothing
for the poor, etc.
It should be noted that these objects were not entirely
disinterested: the fraternity charged with reading the texts,
distorted them; those who buried the dead received fees, not
only for that care, but also for plots in the Jewish cemetery,
for the purification bath prescribed for Jewish women, for
seats in the synagogue. 35 The fraternity for ransoming
prisoners was composed of the most influential members of the
community; as its chief concern was the freeing of delinquent
Jews from gentile courts, it had to bring pressure to bear on
police and government officials. 36
An excellent illustration of a Jewish community in the
twentieth century is found in the account of the organizing of
the Kehilla 37 in New York City in 1909 and of its subsequent
operation, - published in the Jewish Communal Register. 38
The purpose of the Kehillah is to " weld Jewish interests and
develop community conscientiousness "; the immediate cause of
its creation was " the statement of the police commissioner,
General Bingham, that the Jews contributed fifty per cent, of
the criminals of New York City." 39
The first step taken by the constitutive convention was the
election of an executive committee and an advisory council of
seventy members; the latter is the council of elders or
gerousia, and its duty is to " make its voice heard and its
opinions felt (sic) in all questions affecting the Jews the
world over."
The next thing of importance is the creation of a beth-din or
court of arbitration, by the board of authoritative rabbis
(vaad harabbonim) already charged with the regulations of
marriage, divorce, circumcision, and ritual bath. 40 The
beth-din will undertake to settle all disputes between labour
and capital. 41
Further on, the purpose of the Kehillah is made clearer: it is
for the " coordination of the existing communal agencies 42 to
save the synagogue from impending ruin," to which end all the
material and moral resources of the entire community are to be
drafted. 43 In other words, the hierarchy of fraternities for
which Judaism serves as a cloak and the synagogues as a
lodge-room, is endeavoring to strengthen its hold on its
members, among whom there is a tendency towards emancipation.
Finally, mention is made of some of the fraternities, under the
title of benevolent societies: the burial clubs and the
visitors of the sick. It is particularly interesting to note
that these orders assess their beneficiaries: that is, they
operate as life insurance companies. 44
So well is the question of ritual meat (kosher) regulated by
the Kehillah, that " all the meat slaughtered in New York city
and vicinity, whether for Jewish consumption or not, is
slaughtered by schochetim under the supervision ofauthoritative
rabbis.' 45 Of New York's sixty per cent gentile population,
none can buy meat not prepared according to Jewish ritual. But
this paternal interest of the Kehillah for its members and for
the whole gentile population is not entirely unmotivated; for
the Register goes on to explain that meat so killed brings "
prices far in excess of those paid for ordinary meat." It pays
the slaughter-houses to employ schochetim and contribute to the
welfare of the authoritative rabbis.
Thus the Jewish fraternities through the ages have kept their
typical character of a secret government, disguised under the
form of synagogues and schools.
The life of the people, too, has changed little from generation
to generation, and from one country to another: they are always
and everywhere the tools of the ruling clique; to it they pay
heavy, indirect taxes, and in return receive help in exploiting
the land which harbours them. They have a heavy heritage, a
Jewish conscientiousness, a hatred of non-Jews, a love of
deceiving; all this they cannot easily shake off, and with it
the yoke of the Kahal.
1. Exodus xx.
2. The Gospels themselves bear witness to the distortions of
the divine law of Moses by the human additions of the rabbis.
Cf. Matthew xv. 2: "Thus you have destroyed the commandment of
God by your traditions."
3. Compare Matt. xxm. 14-36.
4. Lit. the "separated".
5. From Sadoc, Greek form of Zadok (lit. "the just"),
founder of the sect.
6. Known as Imburah from habor, "join together".
7. Graetz, iv. History of the Jews, p. 85.
8. Vespasian appointed Rabbi John Ben Zakkai, chief of the
haburah, ruler of Jamnia: Jost, i. History of the Jem, p. 210.
9. Brafmann, Jewish Brotherhoods, (Vilna, 1868) par. 18.
10. The clubs were secret fraternities, each member binding
himself by an oath; the penalty for disobedience was exclusion
or death: Jost., op. cit.
11. "Every day, and every hour of the day, and every act of
every hour, had its appointed regulations, grounded on
distorted texts of scripture, or the sentences of the wise men,
and artfully moulded up with their national reminiscences of
the past or their distinctive hopes of the future, -the divine
origin of the law, the privileges of God's chosen people, the
restoration to the holy city, the corning of the Messiah."
Milman, n, History of the Jews (Everyman Library, 1923 edition
p. 165).
12. Literally, "community" or "commonwealth".
13. Nearly every province of the Roman empire had at least
one colony of Jews at the end of the second century A.D.
14. Talmud Torah, lit. "study of the law", name for the
agglomeration of rabbinical works.
15. Contemptuously termed am-ha-aretz, lit. "people of the
soil", and debarred from bearing witness, etc.: Talmud
Pessashim 98. They had to "submit to the haburah or perish".
Talmud Tainot 23.
16. "The hatred of the am-ha-aretz towards the learned
societies was so great, that, if we patricians had not obtained
for them some material advantages, they would have killed us."
Talmud Pessashim 49.
17. Called factors: Brafmann, Book of the Kahal, ch I.
18. Depending on the character of the suit, judges, etc.
19. The Shulchan Aruk is a manual of Jewish laws, drawn from
the Talmud, and compiled by Rabbi Joseph Caro (1488-1575).
20. Loc. cit., Law 24.
21. Ibid., Law 27.
22. Ibid., Law 50.
23. Ibid., Law 55.
24. Ibid., Law 88.
25. Goyim, lit. "animals".
26. Quoted from Asher Ginzberg's reply to Rabbi Lolli, in 1897.
27. The part played by the Jews in the founding and spreading
of gnostic sects is not treated here.
28. "The Mosaic law, intricate enough, is woven into an
inextricable network of decrees (in the Mischna)... The Mischna
fully admits polygamy... Capital punishment is of four kinds:
stoning, burning, slaying by the sword, strangling... The sixth
book is on the subject of uncleanness and ablution: it is rigid
and particular to the utmost repulsiveness... The object of
this work was to fix on undoubted authority the whole unwritten
law. But the multiplication of written statutes enlarges rather
than contracts the province of the lawyer; a new field was
opened for ingenuity, and comment was speedily heaped upon the
Mischna, till it was buried under the weight, as the Mosaic law
had been before by the Mischna... Those ponderous tomes, at
once religious and civil institutes, swayed the Jews with
uncontested authority." Milman, op. cit., pp. 174, 175.
29. A revival of the old Sanhedrin which governed Palestine.
30. Lit. "house of religion": see Brafmann, Bk. of the Kahal,
ch. 8.
31. Hocher-Hamichot. "The synagogue with its appendant school
or law court, became the great bond of national union." Milman,
pp. 160, 161.
32. Viz., the indoui or the herein, corresponding to
excommunication and expulsion from the community.
33. The meaning seems to be, "rebelling against the Kahal".
34. There were four fraternities or learned societies having
this as their object: they were composed exclusively from the
upper caste. For this and the following, see Brafmann, Jewish
Brotherhoods, p. 21.
35. Ibid., p. 38.
36. Ibid., p. 33.
37. Diminutive of kahal.
38. New York, 1919.
39. Jewish Communal Register (New York, 1919) n. If Bingham's
statement were without foundation, would it have aroused so
much indignation?
40. Ibid., p. 50.
41. Ibid., p. 52.
42. Ibid., p. 55.
43. Ibid., p. 120.
44. Ibid., p. 732.
45. Ibid., p. 312.
----------------------------------
redux
But what about the "Supergovernment of Zion"?
------------------------------------
From The Epilogue Of Nilus
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
(Edition of 1905)
2.4.2 Concluding Passage
------------------------
According to the testament of Montefiore, Zion is not sparing,
either of money or of any other means, to achieve its ends. In
our day, all the governments of the entire world are
consciously or unconsciously submissive to the commands of this
great Supergovernment of Zion, because all the bonds and
securities are in its hands; for all countries are indebted to
the Jews for sums which they will never be able to pay. All
affairs-industry, commerce, and diplomacy -are in the hands of
Zion. It is by means of its capital loans that it has enslaved
all nations. By keeping education on purely materialistic
lines, the Jews have loaded the Gentiles with heavy chains with
which they have harnessed them to their " Supergovernment".
The end of national liberty is near, therefore personal freedom
is approaching its close; for true liberty cannot exist where
Zion uses the lever of its gold to rule the masses and dominate
the most respectable and enlightened class of society.
" He that hath ears to hear, let him hear ".
It is nearly four years since the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion came into my possession. Only God knows what efforts I
have made to bring them to general notice-in vain-and even to
warn those in power, by disclosing the causes of the storm
about to break on apathetic Russia who seems, in her
misfortune, to have lost all notion of what is going on around
her.
And it is only now when I fear it may be too late, that I have
succeeded in publishing my work, hoping to put on their guard
those who still have ears to hear and eyes to see.
One can no longer doubt it, the triumphant reign of the King of
Israel rises over our degenerate world as that of Satan, with
his power and his terrors; the King born of the blood of
Zion-the Antichrist-is about to mount the throne of universal
empire.
Events are precipitated in the world at a terrifying speed:
quarrels, wars, rumours, famines, epidemics, earthquakes-
everything which even yesterday was impossible, today is an
accomplished fact. One would think that the days pass so
rapidly to advance the cause of the chosen people. Space does
not allow us to enter into the details of world history with
regard to the disclosed " mysteries of iniquity," to prove from
history the influence which the " Wise Men of Zion " have
exercised through universal misfortunes, by foretelling the
certain and already near future of humanity, or by raising the
curtain for the last act of the world's tragedy.
Only the light of Christ and of his Holy Church Universal can
fathom the abyss of Satan and disclose the extent of its
wickedness.
I feel in my heart that the hour has already struck when there
should urgently be convoked an Eighth Oecumenical Council which
would unite the pastors and representatives of all Christendom.
Secular quarrels and schisms would all be forgotten in the
imminent need of preparing against the coming of the
Anti-christ.1
-
1. This forecast of Sergius Nilus is all the more remarkable,
when one considers that it appeared in the Epilogue to his
edition of the Protocols of 1905.
------------------------------------
redux
Deep.
But what about this?
--------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
1.6 Ten Years Of Zionism
------------------------
Sionism is a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful
weapon," wrote Louis Marshall,1 meaning that the project of a
national home in Palestine would serve as an excuse for
building up a powerful, international organization to supplant
eventually the present national governments.
From whatever angle one considers it, the project is an
experiment on a vast scale. Decades have passed since the
experiment was begun, and it is time to ask:
a) Is the experiment a success or a failure ?
b) Have the promoters of the experiment proved that they have
throughout always acted in good faith, or not?
To answer these questions properly would require a careful
study of onditions, not only in Palestine, but in the world at
large: such a study is beyond the present scope. It is,
however, possible to examine certain points which bear directly
on the above, namely:
1. Did the promoters of the national home for the Jews use
undue political influence on the European powers, England in
particular, in obtaining control of Palestine?
2. Did the promoters (the Zionist organization) benefit by
the realization of the project?
3. Was their administration of funds scrupulous and
competent ?
4. Have the inhabitants of Palestine benefited by the
mandate; has Great Britain benefited by it; and have the Jews
as a whole benefited by it ?
In connection with the first point, the origin of the
Sykes-Picot agreement and of the Balfour declaration has
already been traced.2 Both of these were in direct violation of
the agreement made by the British government in 1915 through
Sir Henry MacMahon with the Sherif of Mecca, Hussein. Then the
Sherif had agreed to aid the British cause against the Turks,
in return for a promise that Great Britain would recognize and
support the independence of the Arabs, south of the prospective
Turkish boundary. The British government has withheld from
publication part of the official correspondence containing this
agreement, in spite of requests made in the House of Lords and
the House of Commons.3 It is affirmed by a writer to whom
Hussein showed Sir Henry's letters that, when the Arab leader
flatly refused to accept territorial reservations proposed by
the British authorities, the latter finally conceded the point
and in January 1917 definitely undertook to support Arab claims
in the whole territory south of the Turkish boundary, except in
the protectorate of Aden and in the region of Basra in southern
Iraq. In March 1916, Sir Henry wrote again to the Sherif
confirming the agreement.4
But, as Chaim Weizmann once said,5 in this connection: "
Negotiating with a government is easy: one must demand things
from a government; a government does not do things by itself;
you must know what to demand, how to demand, and when to
demand. If you know that, you know all the secret: that is
essential for Zionists to understand."
The Balfour declaration was endorsed in February, 1918, by the
French government; in May, by the Italian government through
its ambassador in London; in August, 1918, by a published
letter from President Wilson; and, later, by a joint resolution
of the United States Congress in its 1922 session.6
To allay Arab fears, just before the armistice (Nov. 7, 1918),
the British and French governments issued a joint declaration
which was posted throughout Syria and Palestine and ran :7 "
The end aimed at by France and England in the East is the
complete and final enfranchisement of the peoples so long
oppressed by the Turks, and the establishment of national
governments and administrations, drawing their authority from
the initiative and free choice of the native populations.
"To fulfil these purposes, France and Great Britain have
agreed to encourage and help the establishment of native
governments and administrations in Syria and Mesopotamia, which
have been freed by the allies, and in the territories whose
liberation they are now pursuing, and to recognize these as
soon as they are effectively established. Far from wishing to
impose upon the populations of these regions any particular
institutions, the allies have no other desire than to assure,
by their support and by an effective assistance, the normal
functioning of the governments and administrations which the
populations have freely given themselves. To assure an
impartial and equal justice for all, to facilitate the economic
development of the country by helping and encouraging local
initiative, to favour the spread of education, to bring to an
end Turkish political divisions, too long exploited, such is
the role which the two allied governments assume in the
liberated territories."
Early in 1919 there also gained currency in Palestine the
twelfth of Wilson's fourteen points, to the effect that
nationalities under Turkish rule " should be assured an
undoubted security of life and an unmolested opportunity of
autonomous development".8 In May of the same year a purely
American commission went to the Near East to ascertain the
wishes of the communities as to a mandatory; the commission
reported that Great Britain received second choice in 57.49 per
cent, of the petitions; that there was a general agreement in
favour of retaining the unity of Syria and Palestine, as well
as a strong sentiment against France as a mandatory for Syria;
less than one per cent, of the petitions supported the
establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, while
72.3 per cent, expressed opposition to it.9
Yet, without reference to these findings, the allied supreme
council, at its meeting in San Remo on April 24, 1920, awarded
the mandate for Syria and the Lebanon to France, and the
mandates for Palestine and Iraq to Great Britain. This in
itself was an act of bad faith on the part of the council; but
the terms of the Palestine mandate were still less in keeping "
with the wishes of the native populations ". The mandate
provided for carrying out the Jewish national home policy on
the one hand, and for guaranteeing the rights of the existing
population on the other. Throughout the confusion of the two
aims, and the duplicity of both the British government and the
Zionists behind it, are striking. In article 2 the mandatory
made itself responsible for placing the country under such
political, administrative, and economic conditions as would
secure the establishment of the Jewish national home; for the
development of self-governing institutions, and for
safeguarding the civil and religious rights of the inhabitants
of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion. In article 4
the Palestine administration was to receive special advice from
a so-called Jewish agency; under article 6 the British
government undertook to facilitate Jewish immigration and
encourage close settlement by Jews on the land, including state
lands and waste lands: other sections provided that local
autonomy should be encouraged, that there should be free access
to the holy places, etc.
At the time when the mandate was awarded,10 Palestine bad a
population of 757,182, of whom 590,890 were Moslems, 73,024
Christians, and 83,794 Jews; the remaining 9,474 were
principally Druzes.11 The Jewish fraction, eleven per cent, of
the population, was roughly divided into four groups:
1. Descendants of Jews who had never left Palestine
(negligible in number);
2. Descendants of Jews who had returned to Palestine in the
middle ages (few in number);
3. Those who had come in during the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries, under non-Zionist auspices;
4. Those who had come in under Zionist auspices.
The mandate, however, recognized the Zionist organization as
the Jewish agency with special public functions in Palestine,
because Zionists were thoroughly organized both there and
abroad and were the promoters of the whole experiment; and the
Zionist, Sir Herbert Samuel, was appointed first British High
Commissioner, taking office on July 1, 1920, superseding the
military administration.12
The next point, whether the Zionist organization has gained by
the venture, is easily elucidated by noting the enormous
expansion of that body in the last decade and the millions of
dollars that have passed through its hands.
The world Zionist organization today includes forty-seven
territorial Zionist federations, a few smaller Zionist
societies, and certain special unions.13 all represented at the
world Zionist congresses. There are seven members of the
Zionist executive committee in Palestine (four general
Zionists, two labourites and one Mizrachi Zionist). Their duty
is to watch over the work of the Zionist organization in
Palestine, and to keep in touch with their colleagues abroad.
Of the latter, there are three in England, one in Germany, and
one in the United States.14
To make its activities more effective, the world Zionist
organization has delegated a considerable part of its practical
work to certain corporations and companies, of which the more
important are:15
1. The Jewish Colonial Trust, Ltd., with a balance sheet for
the year 1928 of more than ?10,000,000.
2. The Anglo-Palestine Co. Ltd., subsidiary of the above,
also showing a balance sheet of more than ?10,000,000.
3. The Jewish National Fund, which by 1929 had acquired
about 71,500 acres of rural, and 450 acres of urban land. The
annual receipts between 1924 and 1928 averaged $1,384,000,
making over $5,500,000 for the four years.
4. The Palestine Land Development Co, Ltd., which acquired
about 38,400 acres, of which it sold to Jewish settlers about
14,300 acres. Its trial balance sheet in Dec. 1928 showed a
balance of over $2,100,000.
5. The Palestine Foundation Fund, Ltd. (Keren Hayesod),
which received for Zionist projects during the eight years
1921-1929 a total of approximately $18,000,000.
It maintains a complete educational system, including the
Hebrew university at Jerusalem, a technical institute at Haifa,
four technical and one music school, four normal schools, six
secondary schools, and ninety-seven elementary schools.
Under Zionist auspices there has been organized also:
1. The Women's International Zionist Organization;
2. The Sick Benefit Fund17 with a membership of 15,000.
Of the fifteen million Jews in the world today, 1,200,000 are
enrolled as members of the Zionist organization. To secure the
co-operation of all Jews and thus broaden its base of support,
the organization entered into long negotiations with
non-Zionists in America.18 In these, Samuel Untermeyer,
Zionist, law partner of Louis Marshall (ostensibly
anti-Zionist) in New York, took a leading part. The Zionist
body altered its name to " World Zionist Organization "; then
in 1923, as money was not coming in fast enough, Chaim Weizmann
at the Carlsbad congress suggested that the latter should be
transformed into the " Jewish Agency under the Mandate ", and
should admit all non-Zionist Jews. Alfred Mond, the late Lord
Melchett President of the English Zionist federation, was
requested to go to America to promote the new Jewish agency and
welcome Louis Marshall and his non-Zionist following into it.
While in America, Mond said:19
" The Jewish Agency under the mandate is the broadest
possible basis for all those who wish to help. It will be an
immense aid to Palestine and a great strength to the Zionist
organization, and I am glad to think the negotiations which had
been carried on in London, favoring a committee to include the
Zionist executive and representatives of the most important
Jewish bodies have been brought to a successful result. I told
Chaim Weizmann that it will be one of the greatect honours that
can be conferred on me to serve on a board of that kind."20
After long negotiations, a basis of agreement was finally
reached in August 1929. Zionists and non-Zionists are now
merged in a new body known as the Jewish Agency: its council
includes an equal number of Zionists and non-Zionists : the
executive committee of the council, consisting of twenty
Zionists and twenty non-Zionists, is henceforth to occupy the
privileged position described under article 4 of the mandate.
Such, in brief, are the visible organs established by Zionists
for realizing their aim. What the sums collected by these and
other organs would total is not easy to estimate. The Zionist
organization is said to have spent seven million pounds
($34,000,000),2i and Baron Edmond de Rothschild an additional
$50,000,000 in Palestine. 22 The first sum, however, represents
but a fraction of the sums collected. The Keren hayesod alone
brought in $18,000,000; and, in the single month of September
1929, the Jews of the United States raised more than
?1,500,000.23 A conservative estimate of the funds that have
passed through Zionist hands since the Balfour declaration
would be $100,000,000, irrespective of the large sums spent
annually by the British government. Had such a large capital
been placed in competent hands, there would be no need for
further appeals or loans. Yet in May 1931, Alfred Mond made
personal efforts to float a projected Zionist International
loan and endeavoured to get the Italian government to join with
the governments of Great Britain, France and Germany in
guaranteeing it.24
But the Zionist administration of funds has been not only
incompetent but irregular. A single instance may suffice.
It concerns the opposition made by American Zionists to the
administration of Louis Lipsky, President of the American
Zionist organization, and the resignation from that body of
Rabbi Stephen Wise, Samuel Rosensohn and Lawrence Berenson.
At the Atlantic City (U. S. A.) Zionist convention the previous
year, the disclosure had been made of the mismanagement of
funds, and Berenson and Rosensohn were appointed to enquire
into the affairs of the organization and restore the confidence
of the Zionists in the country.
Berenson said later:25
" One of the first things we did was to create a thing
heretofore unknown to the organization: namely a balanced
budget-whereby the organization could never spend or invent a
necessity for sums in excess of the budget. We found a deficit
of $175,000, exclusive of guarantees, which had been created
under the leadership of Mr. Louis Lipsky in the year or two
prior to the Atlantic City convention. In the creation of a
balanced budget, it became necessary to eliminate a lot of
expenditures such as subsidies and compensation to favoured
individuals.26
" A note on the Mercantile Bank (New York) was endorsed by
the organization for the American Zion Commonwealth for
$285,000. A petition of bankruptcy has been filed against the
American Zion Commonwealth in Palestine. An attempt is now
being made to save the Commonwealth and to raise $200,000. That
is futile. The liabilities are $1,068,000. The assets consist
of approximately $400,000 of accounts receivable, money owed by
American purchasers of the lands in Palestine, and which will
not be paid until the deeds are produced; but those deeds can
not be produced. The remaining asset is land in Palestine,
purchased in the land boom a few years ago. In part, the moneys
received, instead of being applied to acquire the deeds, were
used to purchase additional lands. The American Zion
Commonwealth attempted to build an hotel, but the project had
to be abandoned. The Commonwealth has other contingent
liabilities, and the Arabs threaten to foreclose.
" One of the obligations of the Zionist Organization of
America was the endorsement of this note on the Central
Mercantile Bank of New York for $285,000. President Weinstein
and Rosenblatt had a hand in that work, and were the two prime
movers in the land speculation. When the speculation was rife
and it looked as though the America Zion Commonwealth would
make money, Mr. Lipsky, a man without any business experience,
endorsed the American Zion Commonwealth as an American Zionist
institution, ran editorials in the New Palestine and other
Zionist publications, and was largely responsible for inducing
the American purchasers to make deposits for the acquisition of
lands through the American Zion Commonwealth. Thus the United
Palestine Appeal felt compelled to advance in cash to the
American Zion Commonwealth a sum of $320,000; and about
$125,000 more of the United Palestine Appeal money had to be
used to pull the American Zion Commonwealth out of its
difficulties.
" The endorsement was placed upon that note by Mr. Lipsky
without the knowledge, consent or approval of anybody in the
Zionist organization.
" The United Palestine Appeal found it necessary to advance
these sums of money, because the indignation of the land
purchasers was injuring the United Palestine Appeal campaign,
and even affecting the confidence in the Zionist organization."
There remains to consider whether the native population of
Palestine has benefited by the mandate. It is recalled that 79
per cent, of the population at the time of the St. Remo award
was Moslem and it is therefore fitting to weigh the complaints
of the Palestine Arabs. These may be grouped as follows:
1. Prior to the British occupation, Jews and Arabs lived
together in tranquillity; since, there have been four serious
breaks, of which three occurred in 1920 and 1921 and totalled
104 killed and 400 wounded; the last was still more serious. In
view of the fact that each break has inspired a fruitful
campaign of Zionist appeals, there would seem to be a deeper
connection between the former and the latter.
2. The purpose of article 22 of the League covenant was to
promote " the well-being and development of the people" of the
mandated territories. Alien Jews, living outside Palestine, did
not come within the scope of this aim. The Balfour declaration
prevented Pales tine from creating those self-governing
institutions described in article 2 of the mandate. Article 20
of the League covenant provided that all states members of the
League must take immediate steps to procure their release from
any undertakings inconsistent with the terms of the covenant:
the Balfour declaration fell under this category.
3. Because of the Balfour declaration, the British
authorities set up in Palestine a Jewish agency whose function
was to advance Jewish interests above all others; Jews should
be represented in a Palestinian legislature only in proportion
to their numbers.
4. The Jewish national home policy cannot be accepted by the
Arabs. If it constituted a reason for letting the
Jews outside Palestine enter the country " as of right and not
on sufferance," it was the more reason that the Arabs
themselves should be confirmed in their national home as
against all intruders, and immigration placed in their control.
The Jews already in Palestine were there by right and should
enjoy the same status as the Arabs. But to argue (as the
British did) that the right of the present Jewish community in
Palestine should be extended to all the Jews of the world, was
to adopt a line of reasoning " which no people, let alone the
Arabs, would accept if applied to itself."27 5. The
Arab-speaking inhabitants, to whom Palestine is Falastin
(Philistia) resent its being referred to in all official
documents as Eretz-Israel (land of Israel). They do not see why
a country which they are accustomed to think of as their own
should suddenly become Eretz Israel without their consent,
simply because it has pleased other nations to set up in it a
Jewish national home. They point out that their own possession
of the country since the seventh century gives them rights
to-day which the Jews scattered abroad do not possess. The next
question is, have the Jews as a whole benefited by the national
home policy ? The native Jewish population of Palestine is in
much the same position as the Arab population: it has suffered
from a large influx of immigrants causing acute unemployment.
Nor have the immigrants benefited greatly. Although their
future depended largely on agricultural development, the
majority of Jewish immigrants, as shown by official figures and
estimates, settled in the towns: in 1922 there were found to be
68,000 Jews in urban areas and only 15,000 in rural areas; in
1925, 85,000 in urban against 23,000 in rural.28 In 1926 and
1927 unemployment grew so acute that the Zionist organization
had to resort to doles in the chief centres of Jewish
population.29 For the seven years 1922-1928 the total number of
Jewish immigrants was 79,894, nearly as many as the Jews in the
country at the time of the British occupation; the total number
of Jewish emigrants (mostly disappointed immigrants) for that
same period was 23,761.
The huge sums raised on the pretext of a national home, and the
new taxes devised and levied by the Zionist organization have
been a heavy drain on Jewry as a whole, without any palpable
compensation.30 What of Great Britain? She has long desired to
control the Palestine-Transjordan-Iraq route; by the Balfour
declaration she was led to the belief that a friendly Jewish
population in Palestine would be the best possible guarantee of
continued British control of this route which flanks the Suez
canal and guards the approach to India. Apparently it is her
intention to continue to seek some means of reconciling
conflicting interests in Palestine. But her prestige has
already suffered: Arab discontent in Palestine has spread to
Iraq and India; the Jews have been the first to go back on her
and make her responsible for all their difficulties. Moreover
Palestine is a heavy drain on her treasury: to it she has had
to advance several loans, of which the first in 1927 was for
4,475,000. The Palestine administration has a public debt,
guaranteed by the British treasury; it also has a yearly
deficit, which in 1928 amounted to approximately 800,000.
In conclusion, it is seen that the Zionists, through undue
political influence, engaged England in carrying out a Jewish
national home policy. This policy, contrary to England's prior
engagements and against her own best interests, has resulted in
a costly and futile experiment.
It has created a new politico-racial problem in the near east,
and has been disastrous to the native population of Palestine,
and even to Jewry taken as a whole. But to its Zionist
promoters, it has brought vast influence through the expansion
of their own powerful, international organization, and millions
and millions in revenue.
World Zionist organization, or Jewish agency, or Alliance
Israelite Universelle-whatever name it takes, it is at bottom
always the Kahal with its eighteen centuries of accumulated
experience. Its aims and principles, whether shrouded in the
mysticism of the Talmud or bluntly stated in the Protocols, are
the same to-day as under the Roman empire. But in recent years
the technical improvements in its methods of operating3! and
the debility of national governments32 have advanced its cause
with singular rapidity. Just fifty years ago, a German wrote:33
" Russia is the last defence against the Jews, and its
surrender is only a matter of time. The elastic spirit of
Jewish intrigue will crush Russia in a revolution, such as the
world has never seen the like. When it has overthrown Russia,
it will have nothing to fear from any quarter; when it has
seized in Russia all the offices of state as it has done with
us, then the Jews will openly undertake the destruction of
western civilization, and this " last hour " of condemned
Europe will strike within a hundred or a hundred and fifty
years at the latest, since the march of events moves more
rapidly in our era than in preceding centuries."
1. Supra, ch. V. * 1922-1932
2. Supra, ch. V.
3. J. de V. Loder, The Truth about Mesopotamia, Palestine, and
Syria, p. 19. See also, Colonial Office, Correspondence with
Palestine Arab Delegation andihe Zionist Organization, Cmd.
1700, pp. 20, 26; H. W. V. Temperley, VI, History of the Peace
Conference of Paris, p. 126.
4. A. Rihani, Around the Coasts of Arabia, ch. IX.
5. At a meeting at the metropolitan opera house, Philadelphia:
Jewish Chronicle (May 25, 1928), p. 18.
6. The Balfour declaration was never submitted to either the
French or British Parliament. On June 21, 1922, the House of
Lords passed a resolution expressing its dissatisfaction with
the terms of the mandate. Current History (Sept. 1922), p. 1008.
7. K. de V. Loder, The Truth about Mesopotamia, Palestine, and
Syria, p. 32.
8. H. W. V. Temperley, I, A History of the Peace Conference of
Paris, p. 434.
9. Ibid., p. 145. If Palestine belongs to the Jews by historic
right, then Spain by the same right should be handed over to
the Moors.
10. The mandate was approved by the council of the League of
Nations on July 24, 1922.
11. Colonial Office, Report of the High Commissioner on the
Adminis tration of Palestine (1920-1925), p. 48.
12. Allenby's troops had a song in which the chorus ran : " And
they gave the holy city To the Zionist committee."
13. Fraternities such as the Order of Ancient Maccabeans, the
Mizrachi, the Poale Zion, and Hitachduth.
14. Foreign Policy Association, Information Service (New York,
Oct. 16, 1929), vol. V, no. 16, p. 279.
15. Ibid., p. 280.
16. Zionist Executive Report (1929), pp. 278, 283.
17. Cf. supra, ch. II.
18. Supra, ch. V.
19. Speech at the Town Hall, New York, Sept. 26, 1923.
20. The part played by Alfred Mond, now Lord Melchett, is some
what mystifying. Very closely connected with Chaim Weizmann in
the chemical company of Brunner, Mond and Co., he was a Zionist
and favoured the Balfpur declaration, then he favoured the
Jewish Agency. In June 1928, at his country house in England, a
secret conference of the
Jewish Agency took place, with Weizmann, Felix Warburg, Louis
Marshall and Otto Wasserman. Yet on October 26,1928, there
appeared a singular interview given by Lord Melchett
deprecating the Jewish Agency, with such exclamations as: " Oh,
what is it? What does it want to be? Who needs it? " Jewish
Chronicle (October 26,1928). In
April 1929, he is once more praising and advocating the Agency:
Jewish Daily Bulletin (April 24, 1929).
21. Report of the Administration of Palestine and Trans-Jordan
(1928) p. 117.
22. Reports of the Experts submitted to the Joint Palestine
Survey Commission (1928), p. 34.
23. Foreign Policy Assoc., op. cit., p. 273.
24. Jewish Chronicle (May 18, 1928), p. 28.
25. Address on April 29, 1928, in Washington, D. C. Jewish
Daily Bulletin, May 3, 1928.
26. Our italics.
27. Colonial Office, Correspondence with the Palestine Arab
Delega tion and the Zionist Organization (1922), pp. 18, 19.
28. Foreign Policy Assoc., op. cit., p. 287.
29. Report on the administration of Palestine and Transjordan
(1927), p. 29.
30. The financial activities of Zionism before and after its
transformation into the ewish world agency have a wide scope.
They range from shekel gathering from every member of the
Jewish community, innumerable appeals for funds for Palestine,
direct taxation " a'aser " of every Zionist Jew, equally
innumerable appeals for various relief funds, for government
loans, etc. The money thus gathered represents huge yearly
revolving funds hich constantly replenish the coffers of Jewish
international financiers. How little such funds really benefit
the Jewish needy masses can be judged from the constant ppeals
for relief and the yearly deficits in every department. The
Keren hayesod, the Keren hayemeth, the United Palestine Appeal,
the Ort, the Russian colonization Fund, the Agro Joint for
Jewish Farm settlements in Russia, the Joint Distributing
Committee are a few of the outstanding fund-collecting-Jewish
organizations.
31. In organizing revolutions, founding pseudo-religious
fraternities like the Freemasons, Theosophists, etc.
32. Partly due to the increased facility of communication and
con sequent breakdown of national feeling, partly to the spread
of dema gogic ideals, sentimentalism, etc.
33. Wilhelm Marr, who took an active part in the revolution of
1848, in Der Sieg des Judentums fiber das Christentum (1879).
--------------------------------------
redux
Hope you find something interesting and worthy of your Royal Comment.
-------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
2.5.1 Jacob Brafmann and his Work
---------------------------------
About the middle of the last century, Jacob Brafmann, a Jewish
rabbi in Russia, became a convert to Christianity and spent the
rest of his life endeavouring to throw light on the Jewish
questions in general, and on the situation in Russia in
particular, both in the interest of gentiles and of the Jews
themselves. His two works, The Book of the Kahal,1 and The
Jewish Brotherhoods,* were first published at government
expense some sixty years ago and are still the best source of
information on many points. Brafmann's story, given in his own
words in the preface to the Book of the Kahal, is reprinted
here :*
"During his majesty's (Alexander II) stay at Minsk in 1858,
I submitted to him a report on the social status and
organization of the Jews in Russia. Some time after, by order
of the holy synod (April 29, 1859), I was called to St.
Petersburg in connection with the report, and was subsequently
(May 13, 1860) appointed professor of Hebrew at the Minsk
seminary. I was also charged with finding a means for
overcoming the obstacles to conversion to Christianity set up
by the Jews ... Thoroughly familiar with the Jewish question
(as I had professed Judaism till the age of thirty-four), I
knew where to draw the materials necessary for the work, and
the archbishop of Minsk furnished me with the means. My task
was facilitated by the co-operation of several enlightened
Jews4. I thus obtained valuable material which served not only
for the work in hand, but also to throw light on the Jewish
question in general, as well as their social and religious
organization in Russia.
This material included over a thousand acts of the Jewish
Kahal (civil administration), and of the beth-dins (Talmudic
law courts), showing the power and extent of their secret
government. The Kahal goes so far as to decree what individuals
may be invited to, and what dishes served at, a Jewish family
feast.
On the important question, whether the law of the land is
binding on the Jews, the comments in the Talmud are evasive,
but the documents here listed (under Nos. 5, 16, 166) show that
the Jews must abide by the instructions of the Kahal and the
beth-din, in contradistinction to the law of the land and their
own conscience.
Similarly, on the question of the real estate and
appurtenances belonging to non-Jews, the Talmud is obscure; but
the thirty-seven acts cited in our fifth article prove
conclusively that the Kahal may sell to Jews the right (Hasaka
and Meropie) to the real estate and appurtenances of any
gentile. The documents also prove that the Kahal and the
beth-din are not bound to judge according to Jewish law, but
may hand down personal decisions as they please-Thus, by secret
acts, the Jews circumvent their Christian competitors and
acquire a controlling share of the capital and real estate of
the country.
I submitted these documents together with my
recommendations to Gov. Gen. von Kaufmann, who appointed a
commission to examine them, with the result that the official
Jewish Kahal was suppressed by the circular of Aug. 34, 1867.
The authenticity of all the documents is thoroughly
established; the 290 documents published herewith cover the
period from 1794 to 1803. To facilitate their study, they have
been arranged in seventeen categories, each preceded by a short
explanation on the laws and customs referred to, and indicating
their real aim and influence on the Jews and on the gentiles."
As the subject of Brafmann's other work, The Jewish
Brotherhoods, has been treated rather fully in chapter II, it
is hardly necessary to give an analysis of the book here.
-
1. First edition (Vilna, 1869), excellent German translation by
Siegfried Passarge, Das Such vom Kahal (Hammer Verlag, Leipzig,
1928), 2 vol. French translation by Mgr. Jouin, Les Sources de
VimpM- alisme juif: Le Qahal (Paris, 1925).
2. (Vilna, 1868).
3. Our translation, somewhat abbreviated.
4. See Vilna Gazette (1866), 169: " Views of an individual Jew."
-------------------------------------
redux
And what about Fabianism?
Also a "lie" created by "Jew haters"?
-----------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
3.1 Fabianism
-------------
The preceding chapters have been devoted to a study of the
Jewish world organization, its historical background, its
branches, its aims and the methods whereby they are obtained.
If the reader has followed the thread thus far patiently and
objectively, his mind has doubtless grasped, not only the
historical facts and specific Jewish plans for the immediate
future, but also something of Jewish character and psychology
in general. A full knowledge of the latter-which can be gained
only through personal experience-is the greatest safeguard
against Jewish snares and pitfalls of everyday life.
In the following pages will be found the names of men and women
prominent in political, economic and social circles who, lured
by the tempting bait, have become enmeshed in Jewish intrigue.
To all the world they appear to play an independent role; but
in reality they are merely puppets whose every move is worked
by strings from behind the scene.l
The close observer will discover, slavishly serving the Jewish
cause under the mask of benevolence, democracy or liberalism,
bishops, archbishops, prime ministers and national presidents,
government officials of every rank and leading representatives
of all other professions (lawyers, economists, scientists and
the rest). He will recognize them at once as traitors who have
sold themselves and their country for their own personal
advantage.
" Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a
dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who
would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the
sake of securing their own welfare."2 But these traitors, when
the great day comes, like their counterparts in the French and
in the recent Russian revolutions, will pay the price of
treason with their heads.3
Not less useful to the Jewish cause than those holding official
positions, are the rich scions of socially prominent families:
their wealth and their prestige are the " force and
make-believe " of the Jewish countersign.* A rich young
Bostonian, Garland, gave millions of dollars to the foundation
which bears his name, and appointed as one of its trustees the
notorious " red ", William Zebulon Foster.
" Foster told them that the Garland Foundation could be
depended upon whenever anyone got into trouble because of
radical political opinions. Several of the organizers of the
Communist party and of its ' legal' political branch, the
Workers' party, were promised regular monthly salaries by
Foster, to be paid from the Garland Foundation "
Another example is the Philadelphian, William Curtis Bok, who,
on the death of his grandfather, Cyrus H. K. Curtis, in 1933,
inherited6 a major interest in the huge Curtis Publishing
Company, comprising The Ladies Home Journal, Good Housekeeping,
The Philadelphia Public Ledger, The New York Evening Post and
other journals.7 Bok, now 35, on his return from Soviet Russia,
founded a new group to facilitate Bolshevik propaganda in
America: " There came into being in Philadelphia last week
(July, 1933) a new investigating agency sponsored by the
American Foundation. It was called The Committee on
Russian-American Relations and its membership included such
potent figures as the Morgan partner, Thomas W. Lamont, whose
son Corliss is a near Communist; the Harvard economist Frank W.
Taussig;8 the lawyer Paul D. Cravath,9 a Russian
recognitionist; James D. Mooney, President of General Motors
Export Co.; Dean Roscoe Pound, of Harvard Law School, a Liberal
of the first water; Hugh L. Cooper, the engineer who built the
Dnieprostry Dam for the U.S.S.R. Modestly buried away in the
middle of the committee list was the name of its Chairman and
sponsor- Curtis Bok."10 Many more examples of rich people of
good families, such as Mrs. Elmhirst (nee Dorothy Whitney),
Lady Astor, the Dowager Countess of Warwick, come to mind, but
space does not allow mention of all here, nor of a discussion
of how and why each was inveigled into the Jewish net and into
the base r61e of patron and purveyor to criminals.
Suffice it to say that, in general, these people " thirst for
the emotion of success and applause, of which we (the Jews) are
remarkably generous. And the reason why we give them this
success is to make use of their high conceit of themselves, to
which it gives birth. For that insensibly disposes them to
assimilate our suggestions without being on their guard against
them, in the fullness of their confidence that it is their own
infallibility which is giving utterance to their own thoughts,
and that it is impossible for them to borrow those of others...
You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest of the goyim can
be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of
this high conceit of themselves; and at the same time how easy
it is to take the heart out of them by the slightest
ill-success, though it be nothing more than silencing the
applause they enjoyed, and reducing them to slavish submission
for the sake of winning a renewal of success."11
Much has already been written about Bolshevism being led by
Jews;12 the same applies to it in Mexico, China and Spain,
where the systematic violence and terrorism, oft alluded to in
the Protocols as Jewish means of exercising power, have had
full play. War is now waged against civilization in Europe and
the United States, but it assumes another aspect. The ascent of
the Jew to power in those countries is made on the ladder of
Fabianism, of which Socialism, Marxism, Communism, Bolshevism
and Internationalism are the chief rungs.
The definition and aims of Fabianism are given by the Fabians
themselves as follows:
Basis of the Fabian Society
---------------------------
The Fabian Society consists of Socialists.
It therefore aims at the reorganization of Society by the
emancipation of Land and Industrial Capital from individual
ownership and the vesting of them in the community for the
general benefit. In this way only can the natural and acquired
advantages of the country be equitably shared by the whole
people.
The Society accordingly works for the extinction of private
property in land, with equitable consideration of established
expectations, and due provision as to the tenure of the home
and homestead: for the transfer to the community, by
constitutional methods, of all such industries as can be
conducted socially: and for the establishment, as the governing
consideration in the regulation of production, distribution and
service, of the common good instead of private profit.
The Society is a constituent of the Labour Party and of the
International Socialist Congress: but it takes part freely in
all constitutional movements, social, economic and political,
which can be guided towards its own objects. Its direct
business is: (a) the propaganda of Socialism in its application
to current problems; (b) investigation and discovery in social,
industrial, political and economic relations; (c) the working
out of Socialist principles in legislation and administrative
reconstruction; (d) the publication of the results of its
investigations and their practical lessons.
The Society, believing in equal citizenship of men and women in
the fullest sense, is open to persons irrespective of sex, race
or creed, who commit themselves to its aims and purposes as
stated above and undertake to promote its work.
The Society took the name of Fabian from the policy of
temporizing it adopted, claiming to imitate that of the Roman
dictator, Fabius Cunctator, during his fight against Hannibal,
whom he eventually defeated at Tarentum, 215 B. C.
Frank Podmore, well-known spiritualist and occultist, one of
the founders of the Fabian Society, is quoted as saying to one
of its earliest members:-"For the right moment, you must wait,
as Fabius did most patiently, when warring against Hannibal,
though many censured his delays, but when the time comes, you
must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in
vain and fruitless."
The Fabian Society waited forty years, striking a continual
series of covert blows at the political, economic, social and
religious structure of England, and in 1924 it came to power
with the advent of the first Labour Government, which can be
called the offspring of the Fabian Society.
The period had been fruitful, if long.
There is no gainsaying that the Fabian Society has been first
and foremost a gathering of intellectuals-a rebellious
Intelligentsia whose accomplishments seem the realisation of
Weishaupt's dream of Masonic Illuminism, cleverly combined with
Moses Mendelssohn's dream of Jewish Illuminism (Haskalah).
Historically, it was founded in 1883 at the time when in the
realm of philosophy and metaphysics, the political economy of
John Stuart Mill, in England, and the Positivism of Auguste
Comte, in France, had thrown perturbation into the minds of
numerous thinkers and given abundant food to the Freethinkers
of the epoch. Henry George's book on Socialism, Progress and
Poverty, was in great vogue. The direct influence leading to
the formation of the Fabian Society was, according to E. R.
Pease, its historian, exercised by Thomas Davidson, the founder
of The Fellowship of the New Life, which society culminated in
The Ethical Society of Culture in New York. Considerable
impulse was also given to the budding association by its
assimilation of Robert Dale Owen's socialistic principles.
Among the intellectuals who joined The Fabian Society soon
after its inception in 1884 was the Irishman, George Bernard
Shaw, who was elected a member in that year.
At that time, The Fabian Society had completely seceded from
the Fellowship of the New Life and had formulated its own
Socialistic programme. The following year, Sidney Webb, now
Lord Passfield and ex-Minister of the Colonies, as well as
Sydney Olivier, now Lord Olivier, who has held several
Government appointments, were elected members of The Fabian
Society. Soon afterwards, the late Mrs. Annie Besant, later
head of the Theosophical Movement, also was elected a member.
Fabian Socialism, at the outset, groped its way along all the
beaten paths of the Social Revolutionists who had preceded
them. It also made incursions into Babouvism, Marxism,
Bakounist Anarchism and the then existing various
Social-Democratic groups. Being, however, mainly composed of
intellectuals, bureaucrats, civil servants, journalists, etc.,
the Fabians, whose fundamental slogan was the righting of the
wrongs of the working class, had no keen desire for riotous
street manifestations and confined their earliest activities to
drawing-room meetings.
It does not enter within the limits of the present sketch to
retrace the history of the Fabian Society, but the point which
should be regarded as of great importance is that out of the
drawing-room meetings alluded to above, there emerged the truly
Fabian tactics of temporizing and the decision taken and
followed of penetrating into or, as Bernard Shaw himself
expressed it, of permeating numerous existing societies with
Fabian socialistic ideas and principles.
This method of penetrating into organizations, political and
economic, and of boring from within, gave, in time, remarkable
results. Fabians, mainly Civil Servants, easily found their
affinities in Liberal circles and, moreover, owing to their
loudly proclaimed socialistic profession of faith, obtained the
confidence of the working classes. They were indeed sitting on
both sides of the fence and recruiting the good-will of both
Liberal and Labour organizations.
The study of Fabianism is one of almost unparalleled
opportunism. Fabians seemed to have formulated no original
creed of their own, but were animated by an unswerving resolve
to get to the top and govern England. They accepted the creed
or tenets of any camp into which they penetrated and, by
degrees, converted its adherents to their own views. In this
manner Fabian members secured their positions in political,
industrial and educational fields. To suit even Anarchism, they
formed a special Fabian branch which bore the name of The
Fabian Parliamentary League.
No field of exploitation seems to have been overlooked by these
socialist intellectual Illuminati:
I. POLITICS.
-----------
In Politics, their range of activities has been well defined by
one of its leaders, Bernard Shaw, in a paper he read at a
conference in 1892, at Essex Hall. The policy of " permeation "
of the Fabian Society was clearly outlined and much stress laid
upon the enumeration of results already achieved. Within a year
of this conference, in January 1893, The Independent Labour
Party was formed by the grouping of the local Fabian societies
then in existence. These groups, under the leadership of Keir
Hardie, Friedrich Engels (co-worker with Karl Marx), and Marx's
daughter, E. Aveling, had accepted, as their code, Marxism thus
summarised:-To establish a Socialist State where Land and
Capital will be held by the Community. On such principles was
Russia transformed into Soviet Russia in 1917.
The author of The History of The Fabian Society does not fail
to point it out as the Parent Society, emphasizing the fact
that the Marxist Independent Labour Party was but its
offspring. Thus, leading, on the one hand, Marxist Socialism
and having, on the other, so permeated the Liberal party that
they also practically ruled it, the Fabians were soon able to
take part in local elections, and propose their own candidates
for appointments on School Boards, Vestries, County Councils,
Women's Liberal Federations, Liberal and Radical Unions, etc.
They spared no pains in pushing forward the autonomy of
municipalities as well as the various schemes for National
Insurance, Old Age Pensions, Tariff Reform, Employers'
Liability, Workmen's Compensation, etc.
Politically also, through their offspring, The Independent
Labour Party, they asserted their defeatist and anti-patriotic
tenets during the Boer War of 1899-1902, when they expressed
their wish " to see the Boers successful and the British Army
driven into the sea."
By 1903, The Independent Labour Party, after 10 years of
indefatigable efforts among the Trade Unionists, gave its
parent, The Fabian Society, the opportunity and satisfaction of
presenting England with a full-fledged Labour Party. Up to that
time, Fabian candidates had contested and won seats in
Parliament as Liberals. The practice of the policy of
interlocking directorates had never been better evidenced than
by the tactics of Fabianism.
The outbreak of the War in 1914 furnished the Illuminati of
Socialism with the opportunity of manifesting their
anti-patriotic feelings much more openly than they had done
during the Boer War. It was then that their policy of
interlocking directorates bore abundant fruit. What one might
call the " melting " property of The Fabian Society became more
evident for, as such, it did not create a record of
anti-patriotism. That particular task was entrusted to its
members of the Labour Party andthe Independent Labour Party who
took a prominent part in the formation of the Union of
Democratic Control, which counted the Zionist Jew, Israel
Zangwill, amongst its leading band-masters.
The shameful defeatist, pro-German activities of the Prime
Minister of England, Ramsay Macdonald, Fabian and Labourite
during the World War, and the open support given to Bolshevism
by his Labour Party have for ever sullied the political honour
of England and are a matter of history.
Yet another aspect of Fabianism is the great part it took in
the formation and, later, direction of The League of Nations,
which Bernard Shaw calls an incipient international government.
II. ECONOMICS.
-------------
In the realm of the Economic, Industrial and Financial life of
England, The Fabian Society played no less a part than in
politics. With its slogan of " Progressive Policy ",1? it
invaded Agriculture, preaching the Nationalisation of land, in
other words, the confiscation of landed property.
The first blow to Industry was struck in Lancashire, the
stronghold of English industry, in 1890, with the help of the
late Mrs. Annie Besant,14 as chief spokesman and agitator.
Later, the Cooperative movement was captured and Fabi-anised
and subsequently delivered over to the Independent Labour Party
and Labour Party. It is due to the Socialists having been so
successful in conquering industry that, during the World War,
sabotage assumed such appalling proportions in the munition
factories in England.
As to the financial " ideas " of The Fabians, whose basic
principle is the ruin of Capitalism, they became realities when
taxation of the people took undue proportions in the shape of
income tax, super-tax, death duties-, and are to be followed by
Capital Levy. The promised benefits to the working class to be
derived from such schemes as the National Health Insurance and
Workmen's Compensation and Dole, Old Age and Widow's Pensions,
have proved a myth. Yet they have gone a long way towards
furthering the plans exposed in the Protocols, which aim at
reducing to bondage the Goyim, rich and poor alike.
III. EDUCATION.
--------------
In the matter of Education, the Fabian Illuminati have followed
a theory which is none other than that suggested by one of the
souls of Bavarian Illumin-ism, Nicolai, in the 18th century.
Having secured posts on the School-boards of the country, it
became very easy for Fabian socialists to instil their
educational de-Christianised principles in the school
curriculum. Their attack on religious teaching was subtle but
deadly, as seen in the Education Act of 1902. They boasted
openly of having in their ranks several Anglican bishops and
divines, the list being headed by Bishop Headlam, one of the
earliest Fabians. Eventually they won, having, as has always
been their wont, resorted to intensive propaganda, generously
distributing their tracts and leaflets.
From Our Political Correspondent.
The Government is to be presented with a brand new policy.
Certain ministers are to take part in its preparation.
It is called a " long run"
Under Fabian educational schemes come the formation of the
Educational Groups and of " The Nursery," the latter designed
as a kind of training school for very young prospective
Socialists. Women's groups were also formed, the members of
which participated in all movements tending to a fuller
feminist emancipation. But, by far, one of the most important
steps taken by the Fabians along educational lines has been
their inauguration in existing Universities of " University
Socialist Societies," which in 1912 were finally grouped by
Clifford Allen into " the Universities Socialist Federation."
Fertile seeds of Fabian Socialism are also sown at the Summer
Schools organized annually by the Society, which E. R. Pease
rightly terms a " propagandist society ". The culminating
triumph of the Fabians, in the realm of education, was the
creation of the London School of Economics and Political
Science at the London University where, today, one of the chief
lecturers is the Jew socialist, Harold J. Laski, Member of the
Executive Committee of the Fabian Society and Chairman of its
Publishing Committee.
As has been suggested already, and as can be seen from the
succinct expose here given, Fabianism left no field unexplored
or unexploited. For fifty years, it has treated England to
doses of both pure and diluted Marxism, mostly diluted, as the
English, by the very nature of their steady and conservative
characteristics, are not easily aroused to excesses like those
perpetrated by the Paris " Communards " of 1871. But, on the
other hand, they have been thoroughly permeated, and their
poisoning has been one of long process.
The results are, to the naked eye, the history of England since
the War, politically and economically.
Lloyd George's Coalition Government had been kind to Socialism,
but the real harvest-time came when the Labour Party won the
election In 1924 and its members governed, or rather
misgoverned, England. It needed nothing short of the Bolshevist
alliance which Macdonald wished to force upon the country to
provoke the remaining sound reaction of the English people and
prompt them to overthrow the Labour Government. But this show
of resistance was ephemeral.
How pitiful it is to know that the return of the Labour Party
to power, in May, 1929, is entirely due to the incompetence of
a Conservative Government, in which the people trusted for sane
administration of the affairs of State. Yet, the Prime
Minister, Leader of the Conservative Party, Mr. Baldwin, could
not claim ignorance of the Judeo-masonic plans contained in the
Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion. He found it easier
deliberately to disregard them. Be that as it may, England was
once more in the hands of the Labour Party with the inevitable
and ubiquitous Ramsay Macdonald and, according to the latest
report issued by the Society "eight Fabians are members of the
Cabinet and fourteen others hold offices in the Government
without seats in the Cabinet.'"
From the Jew-led Fabian Society issue the chaotic words and
deeds which are steadily wrecking not only general prosperity,
but also combating with international forces drawn from all
quarters of the globe any attempt at national readjustment such
as the present movement in Germany.
The drawing-room meeting system described by E. R. Pease, and
which in America is known as " parlor-bolshe-vism," formed to
gain well-to-do adherents, still functions, as witness the
following article which appeared in the London Evening Standard
of May 28, 1931:
A 10-YEAR PLAN FOR SOCIALISTS HOUSE PARTY RESULTS IN CALL FOR
CLEARER THINKING. policy, and is planned " for ten years
ahead." MR. COLE GETS TO WORK OPEN MIND ON EMPIRE BUYING AND
PREFERENCE.
To-morrow evening a group of Socialists and Trade Unionists
will begin fashioning the new plan at a meeting to be held at
Transport House.15 The prime movers are Major C. R. Attlee
(Postmaster-General), and Mr. G, D. H. Cole.
Sir Stafford Cripps (the Solicitor-General), Mr. Ernest Bevin,
and Mr. Noel Baker, M. P. (Mr. Arthur Henderson's Parliamentary
Private-Secretary) are among those expected to accept Society
is more intellectual than political.
This ascendancy is, of course, due to the all-powerful influence
list politicians, economists and trades unionists foregathered
at week-ends. Out of these meetings grew the new Fabian
Research Bureau (of which Major Attlee is chairman and Mr. Cole
secretary), which received the official blessing of the Labour
movement two months ago and is now established in premises in
Abing-don Street.17
the invitation of Major Attlee and Mr. Cole at tomorrow's
meeting.
AFTER THE WEEK-END PARTIES.
--------------------------
The new policy-or the plan for a new policy-had its origin in a
series of house parties held last year at Easton Lodge (the
Labour Chequers),16 when Socialism.
It is with this new policy that we are presently concerned.
Outside of England, the Fabians are affiliated with strong
Socialist groups professing the same ideas in Denmark, South
Africa, Canada and Australia, Japan, United States, Spain and
Germany. Lectures by Fabians were also given in Paris at the
Comite d'Etudes Nationales, founded and directed by the Jew,
Albert Kahn, and also at the Club du Faubourg, organized by the
Jew, Leo Poldes, as well as to the French Socialist Party,
headed by the Jew Leon Blum.
On November 1, 1930, the Evening Standard, already, quoted,
contained the following lines:
GOVERNMENT BY FABIANS
---------------------
tion has been made from the membership of the Society, the
latest examples of which are the new Air Minister, Lord
Amulree, and the new Solicitor-General, Sir Stafford Cripps. I
am told that at least 90 per cent of the members of the
Government are on the rolls of the Society, and that, contrary
to regulations, so are a good many highly placed Civil
Servants. The Civil Servants would probably defend themselves
by saying that the
Many Labour members are talking about the dominance in the
Government of that very academic body, the Fabian Society. I
find that many people believed that this organization, through
which many intellectuals entered the Socialist movement, had
ceased to exist. But it goes on with a membership, small but
influential, of some 5,000.
Yet practically every recent appointment, either to high or low
office, in the Labour administraon Lord Passfleld and his wife,
Mrs. Sidney Webb, with whom the Fabian Society has been the
passion of their lives.
If, on the one hand, the British Government is run by avowed
Fabians, the present United States Government is in exactly the
same position. The " brain trust " of Franklin D. Roosevelt is
composed of several Jews, among them Bernard M. Baruch, Herbert
Swope, Mordecai Ezekiel, James Warburg, Frank W. Taussig,
Others like Swanson, Secretary of the Navy,18 Arthur Bullitt,
Louis M. Howe, Raymond Moley, Tugwell, George N. Peek, if not
Jews, were closely connected with Jews and such radical
organizations as the Conference for Progressive Political
Action, the Rand School for Communism, the Friends of Soviet
Russia, the League for Industrial Democracy.
The League for Industrial Democracy19 is the American
counterpart of British Fabianism. It runs parallel to the
Ethical Culture Society, founded by the Jew, Felix Adler, the
Conference for Progressive Political Action, the
Intercollegiate Socialist League, the Intercollegiate Liberal
League, the American Civil Liberties Union, and countless other
subversive groups. Under the heading " Other Fabian
Organizations ", mentioned in the Fabian Society's annual
report for 1932, one reads:
" Active relations are maintained between the " Fabian
Society and the League for Industrial Democracy of
America...with the Public Ownership League of the U.S.A."
Is not one forcibly reminded of the following sentence? " We
appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this
oppression, when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our
fighting forces-Socialists, Anarchists, Communists-to whom we
always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly
rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry
".20
Not less than English Universities, have the American colleges
been permeated with Fabian theories, and hardly any of them are
without a branch of the National Student Forum (long headed by
John Rothschild) or of the Intercollegiate Liberal League,21
founded at Harvard in 1921. Particular attention must be drawn
to the Rand School of New York, founded in 1905 which, ten
years ago, was raided by order of the United States Government
on account of its Communist teaching.22
The penetration of Fabianism in the church of America is fully
evidenced by the subversive activities of the Federal Council
of Churches of Christ in America.23
As President Roosevelt's " brain trust" was recruited from such
centres, it is clear that the composition of both the British
and American Governments is similar. It is Jewish-radical or,
to use plain language, Jewish-bolshevist. Both governments are
run by men who are merely puppets in the hands of Jews highly
placed in the secret councils of the central Jewish Kahal, the
present-day Zionist World organization, whose object is the
ultimate destruction of all our religious, social and
industrial institutions and the annihilation of our freedom. It
is therefore interesting to note that plans, evolved in the
numerous bolshevist-socialist centres created by Fabians,
Liberals and Socialists, are being executed in both the British
Empire and the United States.
It is curious to compare these wonderful socialist economic
plans with those which were to have been the basis of the ideal
Jewish State in Palestine, after the Balfour Declaration. They
were formulated in 1919 by Bernard A. Rosenblatt, a prominent
Zionist, in his book Social Zionism. From it we cull only the
following lines, not devoid of a certain interest:-
A. The Jew as a social force in history:
1. The prophets of Israel as the preachers of political,
social and economic democracy.
2. The rabbis as the teachers in a democratic school of
Jewish students.
3. The Jewish figures in political history almost invariably
the leaders in Liberalism, Labour and Socialism:
(a) Examples: Karl Marx, Lasalle, Hess, Lasker,
Bernstein, Joseph Fels, Brandeis,24 Gompers25
(b) Even unreasonable extremists like Trotzki show only
the necessary evil involved in this Jewish tendency toward
social justice.26
The press notice of Rosenblatt's book in the American Jewish
News is headed Will the Jews again lead the world?"27
The " experiment" of this ideal socialism having originally
failed in Palestine, it is to be tried now in both England and
America. In England, the centralisation of all the plans for
the " new policy " has, for quite some time, been worked under
the name of " Political and Economic Planning" or " P. E. P. ",
and in America it has taken the name of " N. R. A. " (National
Recovery Act). The plans of both are identical, only the method
of execution is different. Whereas the English must be dealt
with slowly, and as it were taken unawares, the American
people, on account of the ignorance and the primitiveness of
the masses, can be treated brutally, as is being done by Hugh
Johnson28 and other henchmen of President Roosevelt. In
America, coercion is the order of the day; "freedom" is now a
meaningless word; whereas the Englishman is asked to forego his
freedom for the sake of patriotism, the American masses, aliens
to the Anglo-Saxon race, are swayed only by cupidity and the
promise of material prosperity. Both methods produce the same
results: the concentration of all material resources in the
hands of the Jews, the lowering of our standard of living, and
complete physical and moral degradation.29
-
1. "Who will ever suspect that all these peoples were
stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one
has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries? "
Protocol No. 13, supra, p. 152. See also quotation'from
Coningsby, supra, pp. 100-102.
2. Protocol No. 1, supra, pp. 114-120. It must be borne in mind
that many of these men have, at one time or another in their
lives, been involved in some crooked business or scandal and
dread its disclosure: supra, pp. 119-120.
3. The aristocracy who served the Jewish cause in bringing
about these revolutions were not even rewarded with life but
perished with the innocent under the edifice they had so
efficiently undermined.
4. Protocol No. 1, supra, p. 118.
5. Whitney, Reds in America. (Beckwith Press, New York, 1924),
pp. 80-81.
6. Together with his mother and younger brother.
7. Curtis's gross receipts from advertising for 1929 amounted
to 73 million dollars; and for 1930, to 67 millions.
8. See infra, p. 211.
9. Notorious radical and shadow of Otto H. Kahn. In 1924
Cravath tried to secure the nomination of Otto Kahn as
President of the English Speaking Union; and the manoeuvre was
defeated only by the timely exposure of Kahn's bolshevist
activities. It was proved that Kahn's house was a meeting place
for Soviet agents, such as Nina Somorodin, Clare Sheridan,
Louise Bryant and Margaret Harrison.
10. See Time (Chicago Weekly) for July 17, 1933.
11. Pw/oco/No. 15, supra, pp. 158-9.
12. Supra, pp. 39-40.
13. Compare the subversive Conference for Political Progressive
Action in America.
14. Supra, p. 204.
15. The premises of The Labour Party.
16. Easton Lodge is the seat of Frances, Dowager Countess of
Warwick. The Socialism of all " Parlor-Bolsheviks " reminds one
of the Jew Isaac McBride's utterance: "We are going to milk the
bourgeoisie and they will help us to keep [up] the struggle
against themselves."
17. No. 23 Abingdon Street is the seat of the S. S. I. P.
(Society for Socialist Inquiry and Propaganda) ; the new Fabian
Research Bureau: and the Socialist League.
18. See Whitney, Reds in America, pp. 49, 58, 59.
19. Among the members of the Board of Directors of this League
in 1926 figured Justine Wise, daughter of Rabbi Stephen Wise.
20. Protocol No. 3, Supra, p. 124.
21. Felix Frankfurter was one of its sponsors.
22. It is noteworthy that the Rand School received important
financial support from the former Mrs. Willard Straight, nfe
Dorothy P. Whitney, now the wife of Leonard Elmhirst who,
according to Mr. Israel Sieff's statement, is Chairman of the
agricultural group of the P. E. P. One of the lecturers at the
Rand School who has come into recent prominence is Raymond
Moley, personal adviser to President Roosevelt, and his special
delegate to the London Conference, 1933.
23. See Sanctuary, Tainted Contacts (New York, 1931).
24. Louis D. Brandeis, an active Zionist, formerly close
personal adviser to President Wilson during the War, and who,
since then, has been sitting as Justice on the Federal Supreme
Court at Washington.
25. The late Samuel Gompers, President of The American
Federation of Labour.
26. If wholesale murder as practised by Trotzki (Braunstein) is
only " the necessary evil involved on this Jewish tendency
toward social justice," one hesitates to ask what evil would be
necessary in order that the Jews might confer on us some
greater social blessing.
27. The introduction to Rosenblatt's book is by Judge Julian W.
Mack, U. S. Circuit Judge, on Juvenile Court, 1904-1917; member
Board of Inquiry on Conscientious Objectors, 1917-1918;
President Zionist Organization of America, 1921.
28. " In 1927, Baruch asked Johnson to join him in his New York
office, and ever since, the General has been Baruch's
right-hand man... During most of these years (after the War)
Johnson was in touch with a man who was in the thick of many
contests of finance, battles of Wall Street, and intrigues of
international banking. This was Bernard Mannes Baruch, suave
and rich New York capitalist, friend and sup porter of the
President, who gave Johnson to Roosevelt... Another ace man on
the Roosevelt staff here, George N. Peck, Administrator of the
Farm Relief Act, was also a War Industries Board member, friend
of Baruch, partner of Johnson in plough-making." Chicago
Tribune, August 16, 1933.
29. " All people are chained down to heavy toil by poverty more
firmly than ever they were chained by slavery and serfdom; from
these, one way or another, they might free themselves, these
could be settled with, but from want they will never get away."
Protocol No. 3, supra, p. 123.
" The aristocracy which enjoyed by law the labour of the
workers was interested in seeing that the workers were
well-fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the
opposite-in the diminution, the killing out of the goyim. Our
power is in the chronic shortness of food and physical weakness
of the worker because, by all that this implies, he is made the
slave of our will and he will not find in his own authorities
either strength or energy to set against our will." Supra, p.
124.
" The need for daily bread forces the goyim to keep silence and
be our humble servants." Protocol No. 13, supra, p. 152.
-----------------------------------
redux
Here is an interesting part of it:
---------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
2.2 How An American Edition Was Suppressed
------------------------------------------
There is a saying in several languages that only the truth
hurts. Recognizing the fact beneath this expression, one is
little surprised at the zeal with which certain parties seek to
disprove documentary evidence. If the evidence were false, then
it would be ignored by those concerned and pass quickly into
the realm of forgotten things. But if the evidence is genuine
and open to verification from many angles, then the truth will
hurt, and thus not be ignored.
If this reasoning is correct, the violent methods used by the
Jews, particularly those affiliated with the Zionist movement,
to discredit and suppress the document entitled The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion, would alone constitute a proof of its
authenticity.
Nilus and Butmi had published the document without comment. Its
success was therefore entirely due to:
1. The self-evident character of the document;
2. The logical reasoning expressed in clear, simple terms;
3. The explanation it gives of international politics;
4. The fact that the events predicted in it have actually
occurred since.
But if its publishers gave no guarantee of its genuineness,
those who have attacked it have failed even more conspicuously
to discredit and refute it. To quote Nesta Webster, in her
World Revolution:1
"The truth is, then, that the Protocols have never been
refuted, and the futility of the so-called refutations
published, as also the fact of their temporary suppression,
have done more to convince the public of their authenticity
than all the anti-Semite writings on the subject put together".
There is plenty of indisputable, documentary evidence which
explains the Jewish plan of action, without recourse to the
Protocols. Their importance lies in the fact that, published at
a definite date, they foretold historical events which have
upset the world, that they explained these events by the
principles set forth in the work itself: this fact makes it
superfluous to enquire whether the author of the Protocols is
the Zionist Congress in corpore, a member of the congress, or
some Jewish (or even Christian) thinker. Their source is of
small moment: the facts, the relation of cause and effect, are
there; the existence of the work prior to the events foretold
in it can never be brought into question, and that is enough.
The first attempt at refutation appeared in 1920, entitled, The
Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion, by a Jew, Lucien Wolf; it was followed by articles in the
Metropolitan (New York) signed " William Hard ". The effect of
these articles, contrary to the intention of their authors, was
to draw wider public attention to the existence of the
Protocols. At the same time in America the Jewish
Anti-Defamation League2 filled the papers with denunciations of
the libel from all parts of the country, thus proving how
powerful is Jewish organization. One of its members was Louis
Marshall, and, as an illustration of its activity, the story of
the suppression of the edition of the Protocols which an
American publishing house tried to bring out, is instructive.
It shows not only the pressure the Jews can bring to bear on
anyone who dares to lift his finger against them, but their own
mental attitude of absolute intolerance towards others, while
demanding of the world complete acquiescence in their schemes.
George Haven Putnam, head of the firm Putnam & Son, New York,
after his annual visit to London, brought out in 1920 an
American edition of The Cause of World Unrest.3
About the same time, he decided to issue The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion in book form. Advance notices were released and
the book set up and ready to go on the stands about October 15.
On the eve of its appearance, Putnam received the following
letter from Louis Marshall.4
MY DEAR SIR:
As one who believes in those qualities that constitute the
true American spirit, I have been greatly disturbed by the
accounts given by the newspapers of the outrage to which you
were subjected at the meeting held at Erasmus High School in
Brooklyn the other evening. Knowing your patriotism, I can only
regard the alleged cause, namely, that you had condemned the
Declaration of Independence and were of the opinion that we
owed an apology to England for severing our relations with her,
as a slander, born of prejudice and ignorance.
I had scarcely finished reading this episode which had thus
aroused my indignation, when I found upon my table a book,
bearing the imprint of your firm, entitled The Cause of World
Unrest, bound in a flaming red and purporting to be a
republication of articles that have recently appeared in the
London Morning Post with which I had become familiar. To say
that I was shocked that your honoured name should be made the
vehicle of disseminating among the American people these
outpourings of malice, intolerance and hatred, this witches'
broth of virulent poison, is merely to confess the poverty of
my vocabulary. On opening the book I turned to the publishers'
note, which was apologetic and disclaimed responsibility for
the publication. It was followed by an introduction which made
it absolutely clear that the purpose of the book was to charge
the Jews with an age-long conspiracy to destroy civilization in
order that they might absorb the wealth and power of the world.
Thus proclaimed, at length came the stupid drivel intended to
support this thesis and calculated to make the Jew repulsive in
the eyes of his fellow-men and to exterminate him, not
figuratively, but literally, appealing, as it does, to the
lowest passions and proceeding upon the same processes that
were employed in the Middle Ages for the same object. Then it
was the blood accusation, the charge of poisoning wells, of
spreading plagues and pestilence, of the desecration of the
Host. Now it is pretended conspiracy to overturn the economic
system of the world by inciting warfare and revolution.
La Silva Curiosa La Silva Curiosa
LA SILVA CURIOSA: Photostat of the letter from the Grand
Sanhedrin Constantinople to the Chief Rabbi of Spain in 1492.
Mr. Stephanovs Deposition
Mr. Stephanovs Deposition
MR. STEPANOVS DEPOSITION: the story of how the Protocols
reached Russia and thence came into general circulation.
The slightest knowledge of history, the most elementary
capacity for analysis, or even a minute inkling as to what the
Jew is and has been, would suffice to stamp this book and the
forged Protocols on which it is based, as the most stupendous
libel in history. These writings are the work of a band of
conspirators who are seeking to continue to make the Jew, as he
has been in all the centuries, the scapegoat of autocracy. The
Protocols bear the hall-mark of the secret agents of the
dethroned Russian bureaucracy, and the book which you have
published is a mere babbling reiteration of what the murderers
of the Ukraine, of Poland, and of Hungary are urging as
justification for the holocausts of the Jews in which they have
been engaged. It has been intimated, and there is much to
sustain the theory, that the real purpose of these publications
in the United States and in England is to arouse sufficient
hostility against the Jews to subject them to mob violence and
thus to give justification to those who have incited pogroms in
Eastern Europe.
I have also observed that, upon the cover of the book to
which I am now referring, you are advertising the publication
of The Protocols, which I unhesitatingly denounce as on their
face palpable forgeries. If you were called upon to circulate
counterfeit money or forged bonds, you would shrink in horror
at the suggestion. What you have done and what you propose to
do is, however, in morals, incalculably worse. You are
assisting in spreading falsehoods, in uttering libels, the
effect of which will be felt for decades to come. You are
giving them respectability, whilst the name of the author is
shrouded in secrecy. Even Mr. Gwynne does not avow paternity
for the book which he has heralded. Much as you may desire to
shake off responsibility, therefore, the real responsibility
for hurling this bomb, for such it is, prepared though it has
been by others, rests upon you. Whoever may read this book and
is of such a low type of intelligence as to be influenced by
it, will not be apt to draw the fine ethical distinctions with
which you are seeking to salve your conscience. As a patriotic
American, do you believe that you are contributing to the
creation of that spirit of justice and fair-play, of unity and
harmony, which is the very foundation of that Americanism for
which every good citizen has yearned, when you stimulate hatred
and passion by the publication of these dreadful falsehoods? If
there should occur in this country, in consequence of those
publications and those of Henry Ford, what is earnestly desired
by the anti-Semites with whom you have arrayed yourself, do you
suppose that, when the Almighty calls you to a reckoning and
asks you whether you have ever borne false witness against your
neighbour, you will be guiltless in His eyes because of your
publishers' note disavowing responsibility ?
I know that you must have been pained, as I was when I read
of the treatment to which you were subjected, because of lying
accusations directed against you. Are you able to appreciate
the pain, the grief, the agony, that you are causing three
millions of your fellow-countrymen and to millions of men,
women and children in other parts of the world by your
participation in the disgraceful and inhuman persecution which
is now being insidiously carried on by means of publications in
the distribution of which you are now actively engaged ? I look
upon this as a tragedy.
Louis MARSHALL.
Major Putnam, still feeling and sincerely believing that he was
an independent American, though not a very brave one, for
throughout he uses the name of Mr. Gwynne as a screen, answered:
New York, October 15th, 1920. DEAR MR. MARSHALL:
Your letter of the 13th inst., which has to do with the
publication of the volume entitled World Unrest and the
announcement of the companion volume The Protocols, has been
read before the members of our publishing board and has
received the respectful consideration to which any
communication from a citizen of your standing and reputation is
assuredly entitled. I am asked by my associates to make report
as follows as to our own understanding of the matters in
question:
1. We are not prepared to accept your view of the
responsibility that attaches to a publishing imprint, or to the
association of such imprint with one volume or another. We
believe that our own policy in this matter is in accord with
that of the leading publishing houses on both sides of the
Atlantic. It would be impossible to carry on the business of
publishing books of opinion, whether the opinions have to do
with the issues of to-day or with matters of the past, if the
publisher was assumed to be in accord with the con clusions
arrived at by one author or another. It is the intention to
bring into print only such volumes as may present on such
issues information that is understood to make an addition to
the knowledge of the subject, or con clusions which appear to
be entitled to consideration, to analysis, or possibly to
refutation.
2. We have on our own catalogue, for instance, volumes
expressing almost every phase of theological or religious
belief. The list includes some books accepted by the Christian
Scientists as fairly representative of their doctrines. In
publishing such books we have, of course, no intention of
announcing ourselves as upholding the theories of the Christian
Scientists any more than in the publication of a volume by a
Presbyterian divine we have expressed our acceptance of the
Westminster catechism, or in printing a book by an Episcopal
friend, we have been prepared to approve the reasonableness of
the thirty-nine articles.
3. The volume, World Unrest, was, as you will have noted,
brought into publication in London at the instance of Mr.
Gwynne, the scholarly editor of the Morning Post. You doubtless
have knowledge of the journals of England and will realize that
the Post does not belong to the sensation-monger journals like
Bottomley's John Bull or Hearst's American. It is a
conservative paper which has the reputation of avoiding
sensational material.
Mr. Gwynne had convinced himself that the papers brought
into print in the Post, and later published under his direction
in book form, were deserving of consideration. As we have
stated in the publisher's note, we are not prepared to express
any opinion whatsoever in regard to the so-called information
presented, or as to the weight of the conclusions arrived at by
the writer and endorsed by Mr. Gwynne. The recommendation came
to us that, as the Gwynne volume used as a large part of its
text the document entitled The Protocols, the readers of World
Unrest would be interested in having an opportunity of
examining the full text of The Protocols. You have already
knowledge of this curious document. It has, it seems, been in
print since 1905, and possibly earlier. An edition was
published some months back by Eyre & Spottiswoode, conservative
law publishers of London. The text that was brought to us is a
translation freshly made from the Russian and is accompanied by
a record of what is known of the original document.5
It is evident that the document has, as you point out, no
voucher for authenticity and it is quite possible that it will
be found to possess no historic importance. Attention has again
been directed to it during the past year simply on the ground,
according at least to the understanding of Mr. Gwynne's author
and of himself, that certain of the instructions given and
policies recommended in The Protocols appear to have been
carried out by the bolshevik government in Russia. Certain
suggestions in The Protocols have also been connected with the
policies of the Zionists, policies which, according to Mr.
Gwynne and some other writers, are causing serious unrest in
Palestine, Syria and Arabia.
In presenting The Protocols to American readers in a
carefully printed edition, we have not the least intention of
expressing the view that the documents are authentic, or that
they will in the end be considered as possessing historic
authority.
Mr Gwynne takes the ground that neither World Unrest nor
The Protocols themselves present charges against the Jews as a
whole. They emphasize certain things that have been done, or
are alleged to have been done, by certain groups of Jews. It
would be as fair to say that a record of lynching in Texas or
Arkansas, or a record of the attempt of the Bryan group to
secure the payment of debts fifty cents on the dollar, was to
be considered as a charge against the whole American people.
Mr. Gwynne's associates take the ground that the leading
Jews on both sides of the Atlantic, men whose patriotism is
unquestioned, ought not to put these documents to one side as
of trifling importance. The time may very properly have come at
which the charges made as said, only against certain groups of
Jews should be analyzed by the Jews whose judgments would be
accepted as authoritative by English and American readers. If
the charge is unfounded that bolshevism as carried on in Russia
has been conducted largely under Jewish direction, the
statement ought to be refuted.
I received only yesterday a copy of a monthly entitled The
Brooklyn Anti-Bolshevist. The magazine undertakes to make "
defense of American institutions against the Jewish bolshevist
doctrines of Morris Hillquit and Leon Trotzki." It seems to me
that American citizens of the Jewish race (and the group
comprises some of the best citizens that we have) might
properly interest themselves in making clear to the public that
there is no foundation for any charge against the World
Patriotism of the Jewish race.6
I wish very much that you might yourself be interested in
preparing a volume that should give consideration to the whole
subject matter and particularly, of course, to these
publications which have come into print as a result of the
world's indignation against the Moscow government.
G. P. Putnam's Sons would be well pleased to associate the
imprint of their New York and London Houses with such a volume
from the pen of a distinguished jurist like yourself.
One further thought occurs to me: You and I are believers
in freedom of speech. We recognize that in war times certain
reservations are in order for the sake of the nation, but we
hold that, with the necessary reservations as to the rights of
an individual, or as to a possible libel upon an individual, it
is in order, and, from the point of view of the community,
wise, to allow full freedom for platform utterances. If,
however, this be true for the spoken word it should logically
be applicable also to the word, that comes into print.
In case you may be interested in considering the suggestion
of a monograph from your pen to be prepared by yourself, or by
some competent authority whom you might be able to interest, I
should be ready to keep an appointment for a personal word at
such time and place as you might find convenient.
Submitting the suggestion for your consideration, I am,
with cordial regards,
Yours faithfully, GEORGE HAVEN PUTNAM.
The suggestion of a ' monograph' from Louis Marshall's pen was
somewhat ironical. There is no doubt that on October, 15, 1920,
Major Putnam still felt himself an independent American.
And the binding of The Protocols went on as usual.
But on October 29th came one more letter from the president of
the American Jewish committee:
New York City, October 29th, 1920. MY DEAR SIR:
Absence from the city and professional engagements have
prevented me from replying earlier to yours of the 15th inst.,
in which you define your policy regarding the publication of
The Cause of the World Unrest and your announcement of your
intended publication of The Protocols.
I cannot accept the theories on which you seek to justify
acts which, in all moderation, I sought to characterize in my
letter of the 13th inst. You disregard entirely the proposition
on which my criticism is based. Nobody can go farther than I do
in upholding the freedom of the press and freedom of speech. -
It has been my privilege to aid in the creation of important
precedents in furtherance of these fundamentals of liberty.
Libel and slander, however, have always been looked upon in
American law as abuses of a free press and of free speech and
as attacks upon the integrity of the constitutional guarantees
that you invoke. Nor do I question the right of any publisher
to issue " books of opinion " to whatever subject the opinions
may relate.
They may be polemical or they may attack the soundness of
scientific, political or theological theories or doctrines. No
fair-minded man would for a moment venture to find fault
because of strictures directed against his cherished doxy.
The Protocols and The Cause of World Unrest are not,
however, books of opinion. They assume to deal with facts. The
Protocols purport to be the pronouncements of so-called " Wise
Men of Zion". The Cause of World Unrest undertakes to charge
that the Jews and the Freemasons are together engaged in a
conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the arrogation
by them of world domination. It is these alleged facts that I
denounce as falsehoods and as libels criminal in intent and
criminal in their operation. The Protocols, which are made the
basis of the Cause of World Unrest and which you properly
describe as companion volumes, are so intrinsically false that
even Mr. Gwynne concedes that he himself has a serious doubt as
to their genuineness. That The Protocols are a fabrication
similar to those that have appeared in every period of history,
appears from every line of that document. I am credibly
informed that the manuscript was offered for publication to
seven different publishing houses in this country, who refused
to have their names connected with it, before Small, Maynard &
Co, undertook to issue it to the American public. The author of
the Cause of World Unrest hides behind anonymity. You yourself
speak of the author as being " Mr. Gwynne's author." Apparently
even you do not know the pedigree of this incendiary book. Yet
you have, I repeat, given it your endorsement by publishing it,
even though you disavow responsibility. Your position is that
of one who endorses a note to give it currency and at the same
time makes a mental reservation against meeting his obligation.
No, Major Putnam, the principle which you seek to establish
will not work. Whoever touches pitch is defiled. Whoever
retails falsehoods and spreads them, whether it be orally or
through the medium of the press, is responsible for those
falsehoods. It will not do to say that you have many friends
among the Jews whom you respect and that these books are not
intended to reflect upon all Jews. The world is not so
discriminating. People whose passions are aroused do not
differentiate. The forger of The Protocols and the mysterious
author of The Cause of World Unrest make no distinctions.
Neither did their prototypes of the middle ages, nor the black
hundreds of modern Russia, indulge in such refinements. Troy
and Tyre were alike to them.
Do not for a moment misunderstand me. I contend that there
are no Jews who are now engaged or who have ever been engaged
in a conspiracy such as that charged by you as existing in
these books which emerge smoking from your presses. The cry of
Bolshevism will not suffice. Your reference to the Brooklyn
Anti-Bolshevist shows what a sad pass you have reached. To
shelter yourself behind the bulwarks of an infamous pasquinade
of the guttersnipe variety and to insinuate that because that
sheet pretends to defend American institutions " against the
Jewish bolshevist doctrines of Morris Hillquit and Leon Trotzki
" you may therefore descend to the same depths, is a revelation
to me. I had not believed that any real, true American would
thus lend himself to the creation of ill-will and malevolence.
The fact that out of the mass of Russian Jews there is an
infinitesimal percentage who are Bolshevists, affords no
justification for laying the sins of Bolshevism at the door of
the Jewish people. To say that Bolshevism is a Jewish movement
is as ridiculous as to say that the Jews are responsible for
capitalism, or because there are Jewish musicians, actors and
poets, that music, the drama and poetry are Jewish movements.
I am not a Zionist, and yet I regard the slurs that these
books are attempting to make against Zionism to be unworthy.
The very Zionists whom these books are attacking have been
persecuted by the Bolsheviks and have been denounced as
counter-revolutionists, just as the mass of the Jews of Russia
have been pursued as members of the bourgeoisie. I am not a
member of the Masonic or of any other secret order, but the
attempt in these books to charge Freemasonry with participation
in such a conspiracy as is proclaimed almost argues the
existence of a pathological condition on the part of the author
that betokens mental aberration. When one remembers that
fifteen of the presidents of the United States, including
George Washington, have been Freemasons, it is unnecessary to
go further in condemnation of these volumes which you are
pleased to denominate " books of opinion ".
I had not believed that a Jew in this country would ever be
called upon to occupy the humiliating position of defending his
people against the charges such as those which are being spread
broadcast through your agency. If ever the time comes when it
shall be desirable to answer such books, I am quite sure that
it will be unnecessary for me to avail myself of your
invitation to make use of the services of your firms as
publishers.
Very truly yours, Louis MARSHALL.
Two days later, Putnam bowed before the will of Jewry in the
following terms:
November 1st, 1920. DEAR MR MARSHALL:
Mr Gwynne, at whose instance we brought into print the
American edition of his volume on World Unrest, had taken the
ground that the publication of the document known as The
Protocols might throw light on the organization of the
Bolshevists. Their operations have caused grave concern
throughout the world and they are, therefore, a matter of
legitimate public discussion.
It was his opinion that if it had not been for the
apprehension aroused by bolshevism, the document would probably
have been permitted to rest in obscurity.
An edition of The Protocols was, therefore, published in
London by Eyre & Spottiswoode, law publishers of high standing.
It had seemed to us that the readers of " The World Unrest
" were entitled to have the opportunity of examining the
complete document (to which frequent references are made in Mr
Gwynne's volume) and we had, therefore, undertaken the
publication of a carefully prepared translation by us, which is
now nearly in readiness, and has involved a considerable outlay.
We now find, however, that an edition printed in Boston is
being distributed as a regular publication. There is no
necessity for bringing into print another volume containing
substantially the same material. We have decided, therefore, in
deference to the objections raised by yourself, and by my
valued friend, Oscar Strauss, not to proceed1 with the
publication. I am, Yours very truly.
GEORGE HAVEN PUTNAM.
What had taken place between October 29 and November 1 ? Putnam
wrote to one of the parties interested that so much pressure
was brought to bear on him that he had to give up publishing
The Protocols, and would be obliged to withdraw unsold copies
of World Unrest. It is safe to conclude that Putnam's firm was
threatened with bankruptcy if it persisted. We understand that
Small, Maynard & Co. of Boston and The Beckwith Co. of New York
and in fact practically every firm which has published The
Protocols had difficulties within a year or two. Of course it
is said that that is purely accidental: but it was just such an
" accident " that Putnam wished to avoid!
-
1. 1st edition, p. 305.
2. This League compelled the Beckwith Co, which subsequently
published the Protocols after Putnam's withdrawal, to insert in
every copy sold a copy of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League's
refutation.
3. The reproduction in book form of a series of articles which
had appeared in the Morning Post of London.
4. See ante, ch. V.
5. This edition prepared by G. H. Putnam was subsequently
published by The Beckwith Company, 299 Madison Avenue, New York.
6. Our italics.
7. Our italics.
---------------------------------
redux
Indeed.
But what about this?
---------------------------------------
Leslie Fry
Waters Flowing Eastward
1.3 New Links Between Communities
---------------------------------
The Jews, disseminated in all lands and claiming the same
rights as other nationals, jealously guarded the secret of
their hierarchy. Prior to the eighteenth century various
nations had from time to time granted equality of rights to the
Jews within their borders, 1 but in every case had retracted
them.
About 1770, Moses Mendelssohn 2 and others began preaching
emancipation for all Jews everywhere, as the ultimate goal of
the race. This suited the Kahal: if its members enjoyed the
privileges of other nationals, they would eventually occupy
important posts in gentile governments and thus extend its own
power and influence. The aim was to a large extent realized a
few years later. With the French revolution in 1789, the status
of the Jews in that country was completely changed. 3 Not only
did they obtain the franchise, but, profiting by the sale of
confiscated property, they soon acquired great wealth. Napoleon
remarked in 1806:
" By what miracle did whole provinces of France become
heavily mortgaged to the Jews, when there are only sixty
thousand of them in the country? ". 4
Jews in Austria and Germany as in France and England, obtained
about the same time political freedom and soon rose to high
social and administrative rank in the land of their adoption:
the names of Rothschild, 5 Cremieux, 6 and Disraeli, 7 at once
suggest themselves.
But, freed from the restricting influence of the ghetto, the
Jews tended to become assimilated not only in appearance, but
in reality. The yoke of the Kahal seemed more irksome to those
who had acquired wealth which they wished to enjoy undisturbed.
As it could add nothing to their success in life, they longed
to be rid of its ritual, indirect taxes, demands of personal
services, and its threats.
Jewish leaders, observing this tendency, felt the need of new
links between communities, the more so, as the new facilities
of communication of the nineteenth century- telegraph,
railways, steamships-rendered intercourse between distant
bodies much easier. A group of so-called " universal
brotherhoods " was accordingly organized in only five years,
1864-1869; they were:
a) Brotherhood for the awakening of the slumbering Jews, 8 at
St. Petersburg;
b) Alliance Israelite Universelle 9 at Paris;
c) Jewish Emigration Society, 10 at London;
d) Brotherhood for the enlightenment of the Jews, 11 at St.
Petersburg;
e) Brotherhood for the repopulation of Palestine. 12 The first
of these societies was founded in 1864: in 1866, it already
numbered twelve hundred members among the wealthiest and most
influential Jews, at whose head stood:
L. Silberman Prussia
M. S. Magnus Prussia
M. Strahun Russia
Rabbi Albert Cohn France
D. L. Loewe England
Sir Moses Montefiore England
In 1864 was also founded the Brotherhood for the enlightenment
of the Jews (fourth in the above list) with its centre at St.
Petersburg; within a year it numbered 227 wealthy Jews,
including Dr. Bernstein, the bankers Ginzberg, Dr. Kalisher,
Dr. Schwabacher, 13 and men prominent in science. It is
therefore not surprising that their efforts should have met
with sympathy among Christians.
On closer examination, the enlightenment these societies sought
appears not to be of the kind to raise the people above the
racial prejudices fostered in the ghetto. On the contrary, the
literature which the society for the awakening of the
slumbering Jews published, with the exception of a book of
travels, was strictly a course of studies in Talmudic laws, 14
and calculated to revive the sentiment of a common aim and
common hatred found in the Shulchan Aruk.
The book of travels, Even Saphir, is more stimulating: it
points out in subtle language the power of the Kahal and Jewish
solidarity. A passage may be quoted as illustration: 15
" Here in Cairo, Jewish business is exchange, banking, and
usury... The Jews derive great benefit from these three
operations, thanks to the different foreign currencies and the
fact that there are two rates of exchange, one fixed by the
government, the other by merchants.
" These two rates constantly vary, rising and falling, and
people who do not deal in money matters are easily misled.
These operations are for the most part in the hands of the
Jews, wise and clever people who, among capitalists, rank as
high as the wealthiest in Europe. They occupy important
positions in the pasha's palaces and government offices. In
fact the Jews at the present moment enjoy full freedom in every
way: their word counts for much, and in trials and lawsuits
with non-Jews their side always wins."
The Kahal resorted to another device to keep its flock within
the fold. Whenever opportunity offered, it made a cause celebre
of some Jew brought to trial in a gentile court, and then, when
the case had become the common talk of the day, it had him
released. In what better way could it show its power?
The murder of a French missionary by three or four Jews in
Damascus in 1840 furnished one such occasion, and the Dreyfus
case in 1896 another.
It found, too, little difficulty in organizing pogroms in
Poland and in Russia. The peasants in these countries, though
of a trusting, friendly nature, could be provoked by fraud and
extortion at length to retaliate. A few Jews were killed, and
millions of their race rallied around the synagogue. The
privileges granted the Jews by the Tsar Alexander II
necessitated the pogroms of 1882; and these were followed by a
cry of " anti-semitism," which, as Herzl used to say, always
gathered the sheep into the fold " -the time at the conference
at Kattowitz in 1884.
Here eastern Jews 16 met their more assimilated brethren from
the West, but little was accomplished. The latter, whose views
had been modified by long contact with Frenchmen, Englishmen,
and Germans, failed to understand the violent nationalism of
the eastern ghettoes, where the aim was a return to Palestine,
the creation of a Jewish state, and eventual world domination.
The eastern group was known as "The Friends of Zion" 17 and was
led by Leo Pinsker and Moses Lilienblum. Pinsker had already
set forth his programme in a book, Auto-emancipation (1882), in
which he had been inspired by the Rome and Jerusalem (1862) of
Moses Hess. Fear of the Russian authorities preventing a full
exposition of his aim, he had limited himself to claiming
Palestine for the Jews as a refuge against persecution.
One of his colleagues, Asher Ginzberg, was destined to carry
his work much further. The latter, a fanatic, fanned Jewish
national aspirations in the East, and from the date of the
founding of the " Sons of Moses " in Odessa in 1889, the
movement spread rapidly. Meantime in Germany and Austria,
another active nationalist, Nathan Birnbaum 18 of Vienna,
organized the Jewish students into a body called the kadimah.
Its aim was to establish a Jewish centre in Palestine which
should rule the world in the three spheres of politics,
economics, and religion, through the medium of Jews at the
control of affairs in every nation.
If the western group, on the other hand, did not respond
readily to a nationalist appeal, they yet were intrigued by the
idea of world domination. International and clannish at heart,
in spite of their outward assimilation, they were to prove by
the sequel that they could be won to the eastern point of view:
if they rejected it at first, it was largely because they
thought they could obtain all they wanted without the help of
their retrograde brethren. They were, moreover, divided into
two camps: the Rothschilds and the German Jews in Germany and
America. The second camp had invested a large part of their
capital in German industry, which proved very productive in the
years 1884 to 1896; they also shared, or pretended to share, in
the plans of pan-German ambition.
But when, in 1896, Germany obtained from the Sultan the
concession for the Bagdad railway and reached out over
Palestine towards India, some leading western Jews were alarmed
and felt the need of uniting Jewry. The only basis of union was
the eastern programme, for the eastern group, being fanatics,
would accept no other.
To win over the western group to the new aim, an assimilated
Jewish writer, Theodore Herzl, was called on to paraphrase Leo
Pinsker's Auto-emancipation.19 This paraphrase, published in
1896, bore the title, The Jewish State. There was little that
was original about the book, but the character and influence of
the author carried much weight.
Theodore Herzl was a typical assimilated Jew. 20 Born in
Hungary in 1860, after finishing school in Budapest and
studying law at the university of Vienna, he devoted himself to
journalism and literature. As reporter for the Viennese paper,
Die neuefreie Presse, he worked in Spain and later in France.
While in Paris, he reported the Dreyfus case, under the
influence of another Jew, the famous Dr. Blowitz, correspondent
of the London Times.
It is said that the Dreyfus case " made a Jew of Herzl." He did
not know Hebrew, and had never been taught the fanatical books
of the Talmud, such as the Shukhan Aruk and the Abodah Zarah.
He was opposed to violent methods, and in one of his novels,
Altneuland, has left a picture of a civilized Jewish state,
patterned on those of Western Europe.
In any case, after the publication of The Jewish State, the
Friends of Zion in Odessa, and the body of students (Kadimah)
under Nathan Birnbaum, adopted Herzl. The first Zionist
congress was called at Basle the following year (1897). Herzl
was elected president, a position which he held till his death
(1904).
At the congress, as the eastern group was the more numerous,
the name " Zionism", coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1886, was
adopted, and its aim declared essentially democratic. But the
western group was not wholly won. Some of them, mostly from
England and France, responded coldly to Herzl's appeal, fearing
to compromise the rights and positions already acquired in
those countries. The desired union could not yet be effected,
and the two groups rallied around their respective leaders,
Herzl and Ginzberg.
Herzl nevertheless remained faithful to the task he had
undertaken. 21 He entered into negotiations with the rulers of
several nations to obtain some suitable home for the Jews. He
failed to get Palestine from the Sultan, and later, the El
Arish peninsula from the Khedive of Egypt; but he received, and
virtually accepted, the offer of Uganda from Great Britain. In
1903, he laid this proposal before the sixth Zionist congress:
it was thrown out by the Zionists who would have no land but
Palestine. Herzl died the following year, and with him the
leadership of the moderate party was soon to pass into the
hands of the violent nationalists. 22
—
An article in the Judisk Tidskrift (No. 6, Aug.-Sept., 1929),
written by Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, contained,
according to the Swedish paper Nationen, the following passage:
" I participated with Herzl in the first Zionist Congress
which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent
figure at that first Jewish World Congress. He worked to
achieve an object which had been fixed beforehand. Just as
Isaiah foresaw, decades before the event occurred, the
victorious power of Cyrus before anyone else, so did Herzl
foresee twenty years, before we experienced them, the
revolutions brought about by the Great War, and he prepared us
for that which was going to happen. He foresaw the splitting up
of Turkey, and he foresaw that England would obtain control
over Palestine. " We may expect important developments in the
world." These were the words spoken by Herzl twenty years
before the Great War. He added that the events would offer the
Jewish people fresh opportunities."
—
1. For example, in Spain, before the reign of Ferdinand and
Isabella; in England, under Cromwell; in Russia, under the Tsar
Alexis in th" seventeenth century.
2. Grandfather of the composer (1729-1786).
3. J. Darmstadter, in his essay, Histoire du peuple juif
(Paris, 1886) says that, from this date, the Jews looked on
France as their own possession.
4. Letter of Nov. 29, 1806, to Champagny, quoted in article "
MSS of Napoleon ", Synhedrian Allgemeine Zeitung des Jud.
(Leipzig 1811), p. 33.
5. Cf. Corti, House of Rothschild (New York, 1928).
6. Cabinet minister in 1846 and 1871 ; one of the most active
men in the coup d'etat of Louis-Napoleon in 1851 (1796-1880).
7. First Jewish M.P. The leading source for the life of
Disraeli is W. F. Moneypenny and G. E. Buckle, Life of Disraeli
(London, 1923) ; see also the admirable sketch, entitled Vie de
Disraeli, by the Jew A. Maurois (Paris, 1927).
8. Haburah mekidze nirdamim. See Brafmann, Jewish Brother
hoods, pp. 96-98.
9. Haburah kol Israel haberim.
10. Haburah shiluhe plakiloth.
11. Haburah marbe.
12. Haburah yishub Israel. To the foregoing list might be added
the Jewish immigration society of New York, and also the
Independent Order of B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant)
founded in 1843.
13. Op. cit., p. 100.
14. Including Pachad Ishak, " fear of Isaac ", an index to
Talmudic literature; Teschubat ha-gaonim " decisions of the
illustrious " viz., of the ancient authorities on religious and
legal matters, etc. Op. cit., p. 101.
15. Even Saphir, p. 18.
16. The two principal branches of the Jews are the Sephardim,
settled mostly in the Spanish peninsula, and the Ashkenazim of
Alsace- Lorraine, Germany, Poland and Russia. The former are
the more cultivated.
17. Hoveve Zion.
18. His pen-name was Mathias Asher.
19. Whose direct orders Herzl was obeying is not clear:
probably those of David Wolfsohn, acknowledged leader of
western Jewry.
20. His enemies in the Zionist camp later hurled the epithet "
assimi lated " at him to express their scorn for his moderation.
21. Osiah Tonn mentions several letters of Herzl, expressing
the wish to retire from the Zionist movement as soon as possible.
22. David Wolfsohn succeeded Herzl as president for a short time.
---------------------------------------
redux
>In article <IfWdna52J76kY77Q...@westnet.com.au>, "Seon"
><se...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>"Sfinx" <sieg...@inbox.com> wrote in message
>>news:fa19cc31-1a6a-4ffb...@37g2000prx.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Dec 18 2010, 8:22 pm, "Seon" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>>> Why do anti Semites always run away when I ask them for facts? I have
>>>> encountered 2 or 3 of them. One time on twitter I asked for evidence to
>>>> prove their lie that Israel fired the rockets which started the Israel
>>>> bombing of the gaza strip and they ran away. On usenet I asked another
>>>> Jew
>>>> hater for evidence to back up his lies but they never provide evidence.
>>>> Then
>>>> they accuse me of being a Jew (the way Muslim haters accuse me of being a
>>>> Muslim) so why can't they just provide the facts and evidence to back up
>>>> their claims?
>>>
>>> Because they have none.
>>
>>That's my point.
>
>Indeed.
>But what about this?
>
>---------------------------------------
>
>Leslie Fry
>Waters Flowing Eastward
>
>1.3 New Links Between Communities
Would you kindly provide me a feedback on "Waters Flowing Eastward"
by Leslie Fry?
dsharavi
> But look at this one:
> -------------------------------------
> Leslie Fry
> Waters Flowing Eastward
> 2.4.1 Text And Commentary Of The Protocols
> ------------------------------------------
> The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion may be briefly
> described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a
> secret brotherhood. Whatever may be the truth about their
> authorship-and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of
> bitter dispute-there can be no doubt that the world society to
> which they look forward is nothing more or less than a world
> police state.
It certainly had - and has - its fans.
“I believe that the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion are a forgery,
However, I believe in the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the
Protocols.”
Joseph Goebbels, April 1924
"To what an extent the whole existence of this people is based
on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the
Elders of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. They are based on a
forgery, the Frankfurter Zeitung moans and screams once every week:
the best proof that they are authentic... For once this book has
become the common property of a people, the Jewish menace may be
considered as broken.
"For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world
believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its
satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again
slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn't even enter their heads to build
up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all
they want is a central organization for their international world
swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the
intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a
university for budding crooks."
"The Jew is the great master in lying, and lies and deception
are his weapons in struggle."
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p 279-80
"Some people still believe there are witches and that they
should die, based on a Bible scripture that was misinterpreted (or
even forged) during the time of King James. Some also believe in the
message of The Protocols, which is to the best of our knowledge an
unquestionable and fraudulent hoax - a forgery."
"How do we know that it is? A Russian court examined the
evidence and used various (non-Jewish) experts to rule that it was in
1993. Approximately 175 excerpts, over 60% of the book, almost
precisely match French satirist Maurice Joly's novel from 1864
entitled Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu."
"A known forger and German anti-semite named Hermann Goedsche
(aka Sir John Retcliffe) took Joly's Dialogues and adapted them into
what eventually became The Protocols. The Russian secret police then
found it useful as a propaganda tool on a number of levels."
Tr. Victor E. Marsden, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
(1999), p 3
"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a fraudulent
antisemitic text purporting to describe a Jewish plan to achieve
global domination. The text was fabricated in the Russian Empire, and
was first published in 1903. The text was translated into several
languages and widely disseminated in the early part of the twentieth
century. Henry Ford published the text in The International Jew, and
it was widely distributed in the United States. In 1921, a series of
articles printed in The Times revealed that the text was a fraud, and
some of the material was plagiarized from earlier works of political
satire unrelated to Jews."
[CONT'D]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
"Amazon.com, April 6, 2000 Review
"Although it's a pernicious fraud, The Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion has unfortunately had a widespread influence--
all of it evil--on the history of the 20th century. It was exposed as
a hoax in 1921, yet it has been used as a justification for the
Holocaust and for innumerable pogroms in Russia and the Soviet Union.
"The Protocols was supposedly written in 1897 from the minutes
of 24 secret meetings between Jews and Freemasons in which they
conspired to bring down Western civilization and jointly rule the
world. In reality, it is nothing of the sort. In 1921, Philip Graves
of the London Times revealed The Protocols to be a fraud, showing it
to be based on a French satire aimed at Napoleon III. In a series of
side-by-side extracts printed in the Times, Graves demonstrated that
the forgers took long portions of the original text, titled Dialogues
in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, and simply replaced
"France" with "Zion" and "The Emperor" with "We the Jews." Further
investigations by the Russian historian Vladimir Burtsev revealed
other sources for The Protocols, including a fantasy novel by Hermann
Goedsche and, more darkly, the hand of the Russian secret police.
"Sadly, despite its clearly fraudulent nature, The Protocols
continues today to feed the fears of the credulous and to fan the
flames of fanaticism and hate."
http://www.amazon.com/Protocols-Meetings-Learned-Elders-Zion/dp/159364020X
Amazon.com Review
April 6, 2000
"As some readers may be aware, a hoax e-mail has been
circulating widely that falsely claims Amazon.com has favorably
reviewed this book. This allegation is, of course, absolutely untrue.
Nevertheless, this rumor has become so widespread on the Internet that
it's already a recognized "urban legend," just like alligators living
in the sewers. Amazon.com obviously does not endorse The Protocols of
the Learned Elders of Zion. This book is one of the most infamous, and
tragically influential, examples of racist propaganda ever written. It
may be useful to some as a tool in the teaching of the history of anti-
Semitism, but it's unquestionably propaganda.
"Does Amazon.com sell this book? Of course we do, along with
millions of other titles. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
is classified under "controversial knowledge" in our store, along with
books about UFOs, demonic possession, and all manner of conspiracy
theories. You can also find books in other sections of Amazon.com's
online bookstore that analyze The Protocols' fraudulent origins and
its tragic historical role in promoting anti-Semitism and Jewish
persecution, including A Lie and a Libel: The History of the Protocols
of the Elders of Zion."
[CONT'D]
http://www.amazon.com/Protocols-Learned-Elders-Sergius-Nilus/dp/1414700210
Deborah
dsharavi
> But have you considered this?
> -----------------------------------
> Leslie Fry
> Waters Flowing Eastward
> 2.1 How The Protocols Came To Russia
> ------------------------------------
> known edition of the Jewish leaders programme. The story of how
> the latter came into general circulation is an interesting one.
A German by the name Hermann Ottomar Friedrich Gödsche, who used also
the alias Sir John Retcliffe borrowed a parody written on Napoleon III
in 1864, by a French satirican Maurice Joly. After replacing all
references to Napoleon with Jews, Gödsche published it in 1868 under
his name, calling it Biaritz (in English it was called To Sedan).
An agent of the Okhrana, the Tsarist Russian secret police, Pyotr
Ivanovich Rachovsky, edited the document into its final form in 1895,
believing that it would serve as a propaganda tool to rally the
Russian masses against the Jews and the Free Masons. A first
[abbreviated] version appeared in Russia in 1903, in the paper Znamia.
A Russian mystic, Sergei Nilus, included the Protocols as a chapter in
a book that he has written in 1905, by the name The Great in the
Small: The Coming of the anti Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth.
Nilus’s book was reprinted four times until the revolution of 1917.
The full text (in English) of the Protocols, as well as comments and
notes, can be found here: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm;
and here: http://ddickerson.igc.org/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion.pdf;
the time line can be found here: http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007244
Two episodes are worth mentioning. The first American version of the
protocols appeared in 1920. It was financed by Henry Ford, the known
car maker. Later, in 1927, Ford apologized, admitting that it was a
forgery. More interesting is a comment found in the diaries of Joseph
Göbbeles, Hitler’s propaganda minister, from 1924: “I believe that the
Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion are a forgery, However, I believe in
the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the Protocols.” This
statement sounds like the apology offered by the New York Times when
Dan Rather was caught reporting bogus news - “Fake but Accurate”.
http://rslissak.com/content/protocols-strike-again-drisrael-bar-nir
Even Herr Schickelgruber knew it was a fake. It didn't stop him from
using it, of course.
Deborah
redux
>On Jan 4, 10:54=A0pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> But look at this one:
>> -------------------------------------
>> Leslie Fry
>> Waters Flowing Eastward
>> 2.4.1 Text And Commentary Of The Protocols
>> ------------------------------------------
>> described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a
>> secret brotherhood. Whatever may be the truth about their
>> authorship-and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of
>> bitter dispute-there can be no doubt that the world society to
>> which they look forward is nothing more or less than a world
>> police state.
>
>It certainly had - and has - its fans.
>
>However, I believe in the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the
>Joseph Goebbels, April 1924
Wooo.
When ZioNazi quotes Goebbels, that is something indeed.
Or IS it?
WHO was Goebbels?
Ok, lets see here...
Joseph Goebbels: Propaganda Minister; Jewish
Do you wish to see some quotes on that ZioNazi,
whose hands are in Jewish blood?
If you start citing such "authorities" as Goebbels, ZioPedia and even
ZioAmazon, you must be pretty desperate I'd say...
> "To what an extent the whole existence of this people is based
>on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the
>Elders of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews.
Well, standard ZioNazi propaganda machine at work.
What else is new?
Lemme throw a couple of quotes on this one...
----------------------------------
* The Jew BERNSTEIN, publisher of the "FREE PRESS" of Detroit, Michigan,
admitted in the presence of William Cameron secretary to Henry Ford,
that HE HAD PERSONALLY READ THE "PROTOCOLS" IN THE JEWISH LANGUAGE IN
ODESSA.
----------------------------------
Mind you, Henry Ford threw MILLIONS for the research on the protocols.
There is probably not that many people who would be interested in
wasting THAT kind of money on it.
And here is the "bottom line" as far as Henry Ford is concerned:
----------------------------------
"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols [of Learned
Elders of Zion] is that they fit in with what is going on.
They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation
up to this time. They fit it now."
-- Henry Ford
February 17, 1921, in New York World
In 1927, he renounced his belief in them after his car was
sideswiped, forcing it over a steep embankment. He interpreted
this as an attempt on his life by elitist Jews.
----------------------------------
He did NOT merely "renounced his belief in them".
He was shown by ZioNazis that if he persists with Protocols,
the next time he is going to be as dead as it gets.
----------------------------------
* "The Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" is the title of
this older book, published by Franz Duncker at Berlin in 1850. The
author of this book was the Jew Jacob Venedey. He was born in 1805 in
Cologne, Germany; expelled from Germany he settled in Paris in 1835...
Prosecuted by the police for his subversive activities, he was protected
and defended (as was the case with Joly) by Cremieux. Venedey was an
intimate friend of Karl Marx (alias Jew Mordechai).
* With Marx's assistance he organized in 1847 "The Communist Workers
League. In 1843 he visited England and organized another secret society
having as a purpose the promotion of Israel's World Domination.
* Thus it is definitely proved that both books that served as a
foundation for the "Protocols," were written by Jews, both of whom were
friend of the founder of the "Alliance Israelite Universelle," ADOLPH
ISRAEL CREMIEUX.
* Under these circumstances it can not be doubted that all three books
are the product of Jewish thought.
* Anyone who will study carefully these books should be very much
surprised to hear the Jews whining about Jews being innocently
persecuted and forced to defend themselves against "Lies & Defamation."
There can be no talk about "Forgery" whatsoever, as we have to do only
with slightly different versions of "ideas" coming from the same
powerful political and economical circle of influence.
* The secret society that was organized by Karl Marx and Venedey was in
fact only an outgrowth of an older Jewish organization known as "The
Jewish League for Culture and Education," which already existed in 1819.
The program for this league was taken over by A. Cremieux and further
developed.
* One easily understands the "Aims" of this "leaque" if he reads
carefully the letter written by the Jew Baruch Levy to Karl Marx. Here
is what he writes:
* "The Jewish people taken collectively will be its own Messiah. His
reign over the Universe will be obtained by the unification of the human
races and through the elimination of frontiers. A Universal Republic
will come into being in which the Sons of Israel will become the
directing element. We know how to dominate the Masses. The governments
of all nations will gradually fall, THROUGH VICTORY OF THE PROLETARIAT,
INTO THE HANDS OF JUDAH. All private property will become the possession
of the PRINCES OF lSRAEL - they will own the wealth of all lands. Thus
will be realized the promise of the TALMUD that when the time of the
Messiah comes the Jews will hold under their keys the property of all
the peoples of the world."
* The spiritual relation between this letter and the "Protocols" is
exactly the same as between an acorn and an oak.
* This dreadful plan is transmitted into action in our midst every day.
* The "Pan-Europa" a periodical of Count Coudenhove-Calergi proclaimed
that the Aristocracy of the future will be Jewish. (In the "New York
Times" of April 14, 1933, Samuel Untermyer made a statement to the same
effect, claiming that the Jew is the Aristocrat of the world. -Editor.)
* The character and behavior of this new "Aristocracy" is substantially
different from the old. The names of Bela Kun (Cohen), Kurt Eisner as
well as the Jew-Soviet "Nobility" will be written for all time in world
history in letters of blood.
* An interesting article appeared in the newspaper "Die Front" published
in Zurich, Switzerland on January 3, 1934, which reported that a group
of Jews, more powerful and more influential than the Zionists, has
organized a "Cultural Movement" on a world-wide scale with the purpose
of putting every country under Jewish domination.
* Always the same leading idea - not the slightest variation in the
program.
----------------------------------
Explained above.
> "A known forger and German anti-semite named Hermann Goedsche
>(aka Sir John Retcliffe) took Joly's Dialogues and adapted them into
>what eventually became The Protocols. The Russian secret police then
>found it useful as a propaganda tool on a number of levels."
>Tr. Victor E. Marsden, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
>(1999), p 3
> "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a fraudulent
>antisemitic text
Utterly dishonest and most disgusting garbage
having no credibility of ANY kind beyond mouth foaming ZioNazi
agenda.
>purporting to describe a Jewish plan to achieve
>global domination. The text was fabricated in the Russian Empire, and
>was first published in 1903. The text was translated into several
>languages and widely disseminated in the early part of the twentieth
>century. Henry Ford published the text in The International Jew, and
>it was widely distributed in the United States. In 1921, a series of
>articles printed in The Times revealed that the text was a fraud, and
>some of the material was plagiarized from earlier works of political
>satire unrelated to Jews."
>[CONT'D]
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
ZioPedia is one of the major ZioNazi disinformation systems.
Its credibility rapidly approaches Zero.
BIG stinky zero..
>"Amazon.com, April 6, 2000 Review
Amazon.com is just another ZioNazi outlet.
Secondly, they are just a bunch of con men and used car salesmen.
AT BEST.
>http://www.amazon.com/Protocols-Learned-Elders-Sergius-Nilus/dp/1414700210
>
>Deborah
Are you TOTALLY sick to cite the sickest of them all such as
ZioPederastia and Amazon.com?
Why don't you cite some Adolph Push-push-in the Bush
as evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction?
I thing things below MUCH more credible...
--------------------------------
"My dear questioner, you are too curious, and want to know too much.
We are not permitted to talk about these things. I am not allowed
to say anything, and you are not supposed to know anything about
the Protocols.
For God's sake be careful, or you will be putting your life in
danger."
(Arbbi Grunfeld, in a reply to Rabbi Fleishman regarding the
validity of the Protocols)
--------------------------------
"If you have never read the Protocols, you know
nothing about the Jewish question."
(Henry Hamilton Beamish, October 30, 1937)
--------------------------------
"Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols,
indeed for many years before they were ever published in the Christian
press.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the
original Protocols at all, but a compressed extract of the same.
Of the 70 Elders of Zion, in the matter of origin and of the
existence of the original Protocols, there are only ten men in
the entire world who know.
I participated with Dr. Herzl in the first Zionist Congress
which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent
figure at the Jewish World Congress. Herzl foresaw, twenty years
before we experienced them, the revolution which brought the
Great War, and he prepared us for that which was to happen. He
foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, that England would obtain
control of Palestine. We may expect important developments in
the world."
(Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, 1924)
--------------------------------
"Each Jewish victim is worth in the sight of God a thousand goyim".
-- The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,
The master plan of Illuminati NWO
--------------------------------
[Pretty much comes directly from Talmud and Torah]
"Personally, I am more than ever inclined to believe
that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are genuine.
Without them I do not see how one could explain things that are
happening today. More than ever, I think the Jews are at the
bottom of all our troubles."
(Nesta Webster, in a letter written May 4, 1934, to Arthur Goadby,
published in Robert E. Edmondson's, I Testify, p. 129)
--------------------------------
Eduard Hodos: The Jewish Syndrome
Kharkov, Ukraine, 1999-2002
In this sensational series of books entitled The Jewish Syndrome,
author Eduard Hodos, himself a Jew (he's head of the reformed
Jewish community in Kharkov, Ukraine), documents his decade-long
battle with the "Judeo-Nazis" (in the author's own words) of
the fanatical hasidic sect, Chabad-Lubavitch.
According to Hodos, not only has Chabad, whose members believe
their recently-deceased rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson is the Messiah,
taken over Jewish life throughout the territory of the ex-USSR:
it's become the factual "mastermind" of the Putin and Kuchma regimes.
Chabad also aims to gain control of the US by installing their man
Joseph Lieberman in the White House.
Hodos sees a Jewish hand in all the major catastrophic events of
recent history, from the Chernobyl meltdown to the events of
September 11, 2001, using excerpts from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
to help explain and illustrate why.
Hodos has also developed a theory of the "Third Khazaria",
according to which extremist Jewish elements like Chabad are attempting
to turn Russia into something like the Great Khazar Empire which existed
on the Lower Volga from the 7th to the 10th Centuries.
Much of this may sound far-fetched, but as you read and the facts begin
to accumulate, you begin to see that Hodos makes sense of what's
happening in Russia and the world perhaps better than anyone writing
today.
* Putin is in bed with Chabad-Lubavitch
Russia's President Vladimir Putin issued a gold medal award to the
city's Chief Rabbi and Chabad-Lubavitch representative, Mendel Pewzner.
At a public ceremony last week Petersburg's Mayor, Mr. Alexander Dmitreivitz
presented Rabbi Pewzner with the award on behalf of President Putin.
lubavitch.
com/news/article/2014825/President-Putin-Awards-Chabad-Rabbi-Gold-Medal.html
Putin reaffirmed his support of Rabbi Berel Lazar, leader of the
Chabad-Lubavitch movement in Russia, who is one of two claimants
to the title of Russia's chief rabbi.
"For Russia to be reborn, every individual and every people must
rediscover their strengths and their culture," Mr. Putin said.
"And as everyone can see, in that effort Russia's Jews are second to none."
Since the installation of Rabbi Lazar as the Chief Rabbi of Russia by the
Chabad Federation there have been a number of controversies associated
with Chabad influence with president Vladimir Putin, and their funding
from various Russian oligarchs, including Lev Leviev and Roman Abramovich.[2]
Lazar is known for his close ties to Putin's Kremlin.
Putin became close to the Chabad movement after a number of non-Chabad
Jewish oligarchs and rabbis including Vladimir Gusinsky (the founder of
the non-Chabad Russian Jewish Congress), backed other candidates for
president.
Lev Leviev, a Chabad oligarch supported Putin, and the close relationship
between them led to him supporting the Chabad federation nomination of Lazar
as Chief Rabbi of Russia, an appointment that Putin immediately recognised
despite it not having been made by the established Jewish organisation.
According to an editorial in the Jerusalem Post the reason why Lazar has
not protested Putin's arrests of Jewish oligarchs deportation is that
"Russia's own Chief Rabbi, Chabad emissary Berel Lazar, is essentially
a Kremlin appointee who has been made to neutralize the more outspoken
and politically active leaders of rival Jewish organizations."
Putin Lights Menorah
--------------------------------
"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot
clearly say why... Not so many years ago I used to hear that we
were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the
complaint is being whispered around that no art and no
profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are
pacifists by nature and tradition, and WE ARE THE ARCH-PLOTTERS
OF UNIVERSAL WARS AND THE CHIEF BENEFICIARIES OF THOSE WARS. We
are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism
and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.
Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...
You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose
we admit the charge. What of it?... You make much noise and fury
about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie
palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But
WHAT IS THAT COMPARED TO OUR STAGGERING INFLUENCE IN YOUR
CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, YOUR LAWS AND YOUR GOVERNMENT, AND THE VERY
THOUGHTS YOU THINK EVERY DAY? ...'The Protocols of the Elders
of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World
War. You believe that book. All right... we will underwrite every
word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that
besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have
carried out, which we never have denied because you never had
the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record
is extant for anybody to read?
If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots,
may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about?
What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your
public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and
movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of
the proved control of your whole civilization...
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our
guilt. WE ARE INTRUDERS. WEARE SUBVERTERS. We have taken your
natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc
with them. WE {Jews} HAVE BEEN AT THE BOTTOM OF NOT MERELY OF
THE LATEST WAR {WWI} BUT OF NEARLY ALL YOUR WARS, NOT ONLY OF
THE RUSSIAN BUT OF EVERY OTHER MAJOR REVOLUTION IN YOUR
HISTORY. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration
into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. No
one can tell how long we shall go on doing it... Who knows what
great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left
you alone.
But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and
pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had
reared, and changed the whole course of your history. WE
CONQUERED YOU as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or
Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our
spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the
French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph
of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice?
And the end is still a long way off. WE STILL DOMINATE YOU...
Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your
progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield
Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity}
which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps
you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit
either to reject or to accept in full...
We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses,
paralyzed your desires...
So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place
we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us.
But we should make no bones about telling you why... You
Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your
civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a
compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests,
aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you
declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly
development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see
the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and
it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and
professed creed of the governing clique is. THE INFLUENCE, on
the other hand, IS certainly THERE, and IT IS VASTLY GREATER
AND MORE INSIDIOUS THAN YOU APPEAR TO REALIZE...
That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates
us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You
go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this
and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. WE ARE
CONSCIOUS OF THE INJURY WE DID WHEN WE IMPOSED UPON YOU OUR
ALIEN FAITH AND TRADITIONS. And then you specify and talk
vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture
promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles,
we see with relief, WILL NEVER KNOW THE REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR
CRIMES...
You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. IT
IS THE TRUTH, and I cower at your discovery... We undoubtedly
had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and IT IS
simply A FACT THAT WE WERE THE PRIME MOVERS IN THE BOURGEOIS
DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTIONS OF THE CENTURY BEFORE LAST, BOTH IN
FRANCE AND AMERICA. If we were not, we did not know our own
interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed
us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They
benefited us... You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and
cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can
you wonder that we Jews have always taken your
anti-Semitesrather lightly, as long as they did not resort to
violence?"
(Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God),
member of the staff of the New York Tribune,
"A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine,
January-February, 1928).
--------------------------------
redux
>On Jan 4, 10:55=A0pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> But have you considered this?
>> -----------------------------------
>> Leslie Fry
>> Waters Flowing Eastward
>> 2.1 How The Protocols Came To Russia
>> ------------------------------------
>> The protocols given to the world by Nilus are only the latest
>> known edition of the Jewish leaders programme. The story of how
>> the latter came into general circulation is an interesting one.
>
>the alias Sir John Retcliffe borrowed a parody written on Napoleon III
>in 1864, by a French satirican Maurice Joly. After replacing all
>his name, calling it Biaritz (in English it was called To Sedan).
>
>An agent of the Okhrana, the Tsarist Russian secret police, Pyotr
>Ivanovich Rachovsky, edited the document into its final form in 1895,
>believing that it would serve as a propaganda tool to rally the
>Russian masses against the Jews and the Free Masons. A first
>[abbreviated] version appeared in Russia in 1903, in the paper Znamia.
>A Russian mystic, Sergei Nilus, included the Protocols as a chapter in
>a book that he has written in 1905, by the name The Great in the
>Small: The Coming of the anti Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth.
>
>The full text (in English) of the Protocols, as well as comments and
>notes, can be found here: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm;
>Zion.pdf;
>the time line can be found here: http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?Mo=
>duleId=3D10007244
>
>Two episodes are worth mentioning. The first American version of the
>protocols appeared in 1920. It was financed by Henry Ford, the known
>car maker. Later, in 1927, Ford apologized, admitting that it was a
>forgery. More interesting is a comment found in the diaries of Joseph
>G=F6bbeles, Hitler=92s propaganda minister, from 1924: =93I believe that th=
>e
>Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion are a forgery, However, I believe in
>the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the Protocols.=94 This
>statement sounds like the apology offered by the New York Times when
>Dan Rather was caught reporting bogus news - =93Fake but Accurate=94.
>http://rslissak.com/content/protocols-strike-again-drisrael-bar-nir
>
>Even Herr Schickelgruber knew it was a fake. It didn't stop him from
>using it, of course.
>
>Deborah
Yep, pretty desperate I'd say.
First of all, there exists no evidence to this day to prove protocols
are not "genuine".
Secondly, the whole argument about "forgery" is just a hoax.
Forgery?
Of what?
How can you "forge" something if there is no author?
Are you out of your mind?
WHO is "forging" whom and for what purpose?
I tell you this: no one less than Russian Tzar commissioned no one
less than academic Dahl, probably the most respectable and honest
person that ever walked on the face of this planet with education
that will boggle not only your monkey ZioNazi mind, but ANY mind
for that matter, and, after studying the issue for several years,
Dahl came to a conclusion: yep, this is the real deal.
There is so much evidence of the validity of Protocols that you can
hardly even begin to imagine to be able to gather such a body of
evidence of validity of ANYTHING under the Sun.
And the bottom line is this:
Everyone with a functioning brain that studied the issues
INEVITABLY came to the same conclusion:
Things in the world happened EXACTLY as outline in the Protocols
ever since.
Henry Ford said it after 16 years after publication
and almost 100 years passed and things are STILL happening
EXACTLY as outline in the Protocols.
Those "forgers" must be sons of God, nothing else,
to be able to see THAT much in the future.
Don't you think?
:)
redux
I tell you better:
Almost ALL top level Nazis were either Jews or of mixed blood.
They gave orders to kill Jews by millions.
Over 93% of top level butchers during Russian revolution
what who? Well, Jews or of mixed blood.
Those monsters killed about 35 million of Russians.
Here is one of your ZioNazis "heroes", Trotsky:
---------------------------------
We have to transform Russia into a desert
populated with white niggers,
to whom we shall give such a tyranny,
that has not ever dreamed of
by the worst despots of the East ...
This tyranny will not be on the right and left,
not white, and red.
In the literal sense of the word red,
as we shed such streams of blood,
before whom shudder and pale all human costs of capitalist wars ...
by means of terror and blood baths,
we will bring the Russian intelligentsia to complete stupor,
to idiocy, until animal condition ...
our boys in leather jackets ...
know how to hate everything Russian!
With what pleasure they physically destroy Russian intelligentsia
- officers, academics, writers"
-- Trotsky, ZioNazi ideologist of Communist revolutioin in Russia
---------------------------------
Listen to the sermons of the Jewish communist leader,
Leia Davidovich Trotsky (Bronstein) during the revolution:
"We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward,
not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them."
-- (Goldwin Smith - Oxford University Modern History Professor - October 1981)
---------------------------------
redux
The most prominent Gentile and Jewish-Nazi leaders were:
* Adolf Hitler: half Jew
* Rudolf Hess: Reich Minister; half Jew
* Hermann Goring: Head of German Luftwaffe
* Gregor and Otto Strasser: brothers and leaders in Nazi party
* Joseph Goebbels: Propaganda Minister; Jewish
* Alfred Rosenberg: Editor of the official Nazi paper "Volkisher Beobachter;"
Reich Minister for Eastern occupied territories; Jewish
* Hans Frank: legal council of the Nazi party; Jewish
* Heinrich Himmler: Head of Gestapo; commander of the SS; homosexual
* Joachim von Ribbenstrop: Foreign Minister
* Reinhard Heydrich: Security chief and Second in command of SS; later became
the Governor of Bohemia and Moravia; homosexual; Jewish
* Admiral Wilhelm Canaris: Chief of German Intelligence; Jewish
* Abram Goldberg a.k.a. Julius Streicher: Editor of the weekly Nazi paper "Der
Sturmer;" homosexual; Jewish
* Adolf Eichman: SS Officer; prosecutor; Jewish
* Robert Ley: Ministry of Labor; organized the slave labor camps
* Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski: SS General
* Odilo Globocnik: SS General
* Helmut Schmidt: officer in Luftwaffe
>Over 93% of top level butchers during Russian revolution
>what who? Well, Jews or of mixed blood.
>
>Those monsters killed about 35 million of Russians.
Joseph Stalin (1879-1953)
Joseph Stalin was half Jewish and half Russian. In 1903 he was recruited by
the Russian secret police and led a double life. He was arrested 8 times; he
escaped and continued his work in the Marxist/socialist movement.
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870-1924)
Vladimir Lenin was also half Jewish and half Russian. He was a
Marxists/Socialist that worked for the Jewish world leaders. He was arrested a
few times and sentence to exile in Siberia where he married his Jewish wife.
After he served his sentence, they lived in Germany, Belgium, England, Poland,
and Switzerland before returning to Russia. He was never employed but lived a
life of luxury in Europe. He was a member of the French freemasons "Art et
Travai."
Leon (Lev) Trotsky (1879-1940)
Leon Trotsky’s real name was Leiba Bronstein. He was under the training of
Alexander Parvus (whose real name was Israel Gelfand) during high school.
Parvus was a Russian Jewish freemason. He not only taught Trotsky in the
Talmud but he also introduced him to the Kabala, Zionism and
Marxism/Socialism. Trotsky became a member of the freemasons and the B’nai
B’rth.
The Russian police arrested him twice, each time he was sentenced to exile in
Siberia but escaped both times. Together with Lenin, Trotsky and Parvus helped
arrange the Russian revolution. Trotsky was finally deported to the United
States where he lived under the protection and payroll of Jacob Schiff.
In an interview with the publication, "New American Journal," on February 3,
1949, John Schiff, the grandson of Jacob Schiff told the interviewer that his
grandfather had given 20 million dollars to start the Russian revolution.
Other American Jews and Gentiles who also donated to the cause of the Russian
revolution were Paul Warburg, Harriman, Rockefeller, and J. P. Morgan.
In 1917, Lenin and Trotsky started the process of taking over Russia. Joseph
Stalin joined the group as a double agent, working also for the Russian
government. Some 8,000 Jewish revolutionaries joined at St. Petersburg to form
the core of the emerging communist party. These men took leadership in the Red
Army and in the terrible "Cheka" later renamed to NKVD and then renamed again
to KGB.
The Russian revolution was in reality a Jewish takeover of Russia in the midst
of WWI, in preparation for the formation of the state of Israel and the coming
Jewish Messiah.
redux
Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
-----------------------
Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906 - 1957)
Rudolf Kasztner was born to Jewish parents in Transylvania, a
state of Austria which was transferred to Romania. Kasztner
studied and became an attorney, journalist and a leader in the
Zionist youth movement "Aviva Barissia" and "Ha-lhud ha-Olam."
He moved to Budapest in 1942 and joined a local Palestine
Foundation Fund which was a fundraising organization of the
World Zionist Organization. He also held the post of Vice
chairman of the Hungarian Zionist Federation.
Kasztner was in the top management of the Zionist movement and
authorized to negotiate with the German Nazis and make deals
with them. He was accepted by Hitler’s regime as Zionist leader
representing Hungary. Early in WWII, he had open channels to
Henrich Himmler (1900-1945). When Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962)
traveled to Budapest in March 1944, he met with Rudolf and
worked out some deals after Hungary surrendered to Germany
during the war.
In the early days of Hitler’s government, an arrangement had
been worked out between Nazis and Zionists to transfer Jews to
Palestine in exchange for payment to the German Government.
Only a small number of Jews were allowed to escape. Of the
750,000 Jews in Hungary, 550,000 were sent to their deaths in
German extermination camps.
Kasztner did not work alone. Joel Eugen Brand (1906-1964), a
Jew from Transylvania started to work with him in 1943 in
rescuing Jewish refugees. Brand received an message from Adolf
Eichmann to travel to Turkey and convey the message to the
Jewish Agency that Hungarian Jews would be spared and released
in exchange for military supplies. A meeting took place with
the Jewish agency on June 16, 1944. Brand was arrested by
British security forces en route to Palestine and sent to a
military detention center in Cairo, Egypt. There he was allowed
to meet Moshe Sharrett (1894-1965) the head of the Secret
Security Commission of the Jewish Agency and a high official in
the Zionist movement. The British Government refused to accept
the German offer and the shipment of Hungarian Jews to the
death camps began. However, Kasztner was able to negotiate with
Neutral nations, and some trucks and other supplies were given
to the Germans that resulted in 1,786 Jews being released into
Switzerland. Kasztner’s efforts were marginal compared to the
550,000 Hungarian Jews who died in Germany. Many of the
Hungarian Jews were kept no more than three miles from the
border with Romania and were only guarded by a small group of
German soldiers since Germany was losing a lot of manpower to
the losses against the Allied forces. There were also very
strong underground fighters in Hungary which could have
overpowered the Germany soldiers. Instead of being warned and
helped to flee, Kasztner told the imprisoned Jews that there
was no danger and that they should just be patient. The Jews
trusted their Zionist leadership and sat like cattle outside a
slaughterhouse waiting for their deaths.
Later, after WWII, Rudolf Kasztner was given a government
position in Israel as member of the Mapai party. In 1953, he
was accused by Malkiel Gruenwald of collaborating with the
Nazis and being the direct cause of the deaths of Hungarian
Jews. The Israeli government took it very seriously and tried
to protect Rudolf Kasztner by ordering the Israeli attorney
general to file a criminal lawsuit against Gruenwald! On June
22, 1955, the judge found that the case against Rudolf Kasztner
had merit and so the Israeli cabinet voted to order the
attorney general to appeal it to a higher court. A vote of no
confidence was introduced in the Israeli Parliament, and when
Zionists refused to support the vote, it caused a cabinet
crisis. If the truth of the Holocaust came out, it could bring
down the Zionist Movement and threaten the very existence of
Israel. Most Jews didn’t know that the Zionists worked with the
Nazi’s. If the public were informed about the truth, they would
react with horror and outrage. The Supreme Court would have
started its hearings in 1958, but the Zionist movement couldn’t
take the chance being incriminated if Kasztner testified. As a
result, Kasztner was assassinated on March 3, 1957. On January
17, 1958, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the late Rudolf
Kazstner.
Evidence
The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the
Nazi’s was reported in a book called "Perfidy" by an American
born Jew named Ben Hecht (1894-1964). Ben was a staunch
supporter of a Jewish state in Palestine at first but in the
end he became a strong anti-Zionist. His book is a
well-documented expose of the Zionist movement and how the
Zionist Leadership worked with the Nazis in the annihilation of
their fellow Jews to create such a hostile climate in Europe
that Jews had no other option but to immigrate to Palestine.
More evidence
In 1977 Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld published a book called "The
Holocaust Victims." Schonfeld confirmed the writings of Ben
Hecht and wrote that the Zionist leadership was concerned only
in the creation of the state of Israel, not with saving Jewish
lives. The book had photocopied documents supporting the
charges of betrayal against the following three people:
1. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), a Zionist Leader and the first
President of Israel.
2. Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949), a Hungarian born Jew living
in the USA.
3. Yitzhak Grunbaum (1879-1970), a Polish Jew and the chairman
of Jewish Agency, a high leader in the Zionistic movement and
Minister of Interior of the first Israeli cabinet in 1948
Paul Wallenberg was the Swedish ambassador to Hungary. He
arrived shortly after 438,000 Jews were deported from Hungary
to their deaths in German extermination camps. He issued
Swedish passports to approximately 35,000 Jews and made Adolf
Eichmann furious. As the Germans would march Jews in what was
known as death marches, Wallenburg and his staff would go to
train stations and hand out passports to rescue the Jews from
being taken. This upset Rudolf Kasztner and his Zionist teams
because the goal of the Swedish team was to transport as many
Jews as possible to Sweden as soon as the war was over. This
was contrary to the goals of the Zionist leadership who were
implementing Herzl’s plan. Any surviving Jews were to be taken
to Palestine, not Sweden. Wallenburg succeeded in bringing out
more Jews than Rudolf Kazstner ever did. When the Soviet army
invaded Hungary in January 1945, Wallenburg was arrested on
January 17. He was charged with espionage and murdered. Paul
Wallenburg had exposed the cooperation of the Zionist
leadership with the Nazis and this was a secret that could not
be let out. Therefore, the Communist/Zionist leadership
eliminated a noble man who had given his all to save Jewish
men, women and children.
When the debate about the Nazis working with the Zionists would
not go away, the Jewish Leadership decided that something must
be done to put the issue to rest. If the gentile population
found out about the dark shadow over the formation of Israel,
it could undermine current and future support for the state of
Israel that cannot exist without the billions of dollars it
receives in aid every year from the United States.
Edwin Black, an American born Jewish writer and journalist was
asked in 1978 to investigate and write a history of the events.
With a team of more than 10 Jewish experts, the project took
five years. The book was named, "The Transfer Agreement," and
it accurately points out a whole list of Jews in the Nazi
leadership but the conclusion innocently states that the
Zionists who negotiated the transfer agreement could not have
anticipated the concentration camps and gas chambers. The book
is very well researched but still doesn’t tell the history of
the Zionist movement and the ideology of Theodor Herzl. Most
importantly, it leaves out Herzl’s words that "if whole
branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it, as long as
a Jewish state in Palestine is created."
Edwin Black’s book is a great documentation, but it is sad that
he and the Jewish Leadership are not willing to face the facts
that the Zionist Leadership was the cause of the Holocaust. It
is even more sad to think that the Jewish people suffered
tremendously during the Nazi regime caused by their own
leadership. They were sacrificed for the cause of establishing
a "kingdom" on earth, which has no place for the God of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Matthew 23:13-15) Some day in the
future the Jewish people will understand that their Messiah,
which their ancestors rejected, was the Son of God. (Zechariah
12:10-14)
In 1964 a book by Dietrich Bronder (German Jew) was published
in Germany called, "Before Hitler came." The book tried to come
to grips with why the German Jews turned on their own people
and caused so much destruction of innocent people. The answer
given in the book states that the driving force behind the
Jewish Nazis, was the old dream to have a Messiah who could
establish a world rule with the Jews in power. The same
ideology as can be seen in John 6:14-15.
redux
Spain, 1480. Inquisition.
The first Grand Inquisitor was Tomas Torquemada,
a baptized Jew. A Jew, baptized, is a Jew who converted to Christian faith.
His successor was General Inquisitor Diego de Deza,
a pure-blooded Jew, baptized.
The next one was Alonso Manrique, also a full-blooded Jew.
All of their entourage consisted also of Jewish converts
to Christianity and half Jews.
During that time, they destroyed and burned tens of thousands of Jews,
the entire Jewish community was expelled from Spain.
While the Jews were leaving, tens of thousands more of them perished.
The Jews were expelled for 500 years.
So... Who was destroying the Jews?
One kind of Jews thought that the other kind of Jews
were thinking wrongly, and so they destroyed them.
So teaches Tora.
Germany. 1938-1945. The same story.
Head of the SS, Himmler, half Jew,
his right hand, Chief SD Security Officer Hendrych, half Jew,
took part in destruction of millions of Jews,
the chief of military intelligence Canaris, Jew,
the Nazi ideologist, Alfred Rosenberg, Jew,
who borrowed all his Nazi ideology from the Torah and the Talmud,
Rudolf Hess - half Jew,
Goebbels - 1/4 Jew,
Hans Frank, who destroyed all the Jews in Poland, half Jew,
the same thing with Adolf Hitler a 1/4 Jew.
The world-renowned Otto Adolf Eichmann, a pure-blooded Jew,
chief specialist and executioner of the Jewish people
under Hitler.<br>
He was tried and hanged in Israel.
They say his last words on the scaffold were:
"Well, hang, hang ....
One less Zhid in the would ..."
Here is the count of Jews and half Jews
in the German army during the Second World War:
Jews and half Jews:
2 - Marshals,
2 - full generals,
8 - lieutenant-generals,
5 - Major-Generals,
23 - Colonels,
150 thousand soldiers.
Jews were destroying Jews.
Jews under Hitler were acting according to what they were tauthgt by Tora.
If a Judean does not like the teachings and thoughts of another person,
let it even be Jew, or even your children or wife,
then kill them.
Whatever Jews fought for, that is what they got stubbed against.
redux
>> But look at this one:
>> -------------------------------------
>> Leslie Fry
>> Waters Flowing Eastward
>> 2.4.1 Text And Commentary Of The Protocols
>> ------------------------------------------
>> described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a
>> secret brotherhood. Whatever may be the truth about their
>> authorship-and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of
>> bitter dispute-there can be no doubt that the world society to
>> which they look forward is nothing more or less than a world
>> police state.
>
>It certainly had - and has - its fans.
>
>However, I believe in the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the
>Protocols.
>Joseph Goebbels, April 1924
Seid Heil!
You wish to argue the "validity" of the Protocols?
Well, they were written on paper and anything written on paper
is valid.
Oh, it does not fit YOUR ZioNazi agenda of the utmost disgust,
violence and blood thirst?
Too bad.
Better jump from the Golden Gate bridge and quick at that.
You know why?
Well, because "the revolution in Russia is simply inevitable"
said the kernel of the special forces, the leader of the
movement in Russia to take their country back from ZioNazis.
Now, you mouth foaming bitch, do you realize what it means
a REVOLUTION in Russia?
You think Baby Yar was bad?
Well, it was chickenshit compared to what is already happening
in Russia, this very moment.
The last time several hundred of the elite special forces
veterans came out on the streets, the OMON (the special forces)
would not dare to become violent with them. Their bosses went
behind the front line with their loudspeakers instructing them
what to do.
But when Russian goes against Russian because of some stinky
violent parasite ZioNazi, you better believe the whole world
will shake to its roots.
Clear enough, you evil worshipping bitch?
>Deborah
Dave Heil
> You think Baby Yar was bad?
Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
dog house on top of it was a scream.
Good old Baby Yar.
redux
>Good old Baby Yar.
Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
in significance.
Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
Isn't it?
That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
and especially in a laughing manner.
Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
issued.
You can get in jail for saying things like these.
As far as Holocaust goes, the worst one was carried out by
ZioNazis during the WWII when 800,000 Jews were destroyed
just to save 600 ZioNazis and provide them the safe passage
out of occupied territoris as a result of a deal made by
ZioNazis and Nazis.
Furthermore, Nazism was created by ZioNazis and simply copied
by Nazis word by word. It comes directly from "holy" scriptures,
such as Talmud and Torah. Exept instead of "goyim" to be considered
a "lower race", and "inhuman" by ZioNazis, Jews were considered
the same thing by Nazis. Otherwise, the entire Nazi ideology
comes directly from Eastern Zionists.
Mein Kampf was given to Hitler chapter by chapter to be signed
as though he wrote it when he was in Jail. He was regularly visited
in jail by two ZioNazis.
---------------------------------
"This nation will rule over all others ...
And this nation is Israel, which, among other nations, is the highest
kind of humanity ...
there is only only supernation that is color and purpose of
human kind:
the others were created only to serve this purpose, to serve as a
ladder by which they could climb to the summit of the cherished
top ...
ignoring the fact that it could cost the masses of the lower
creatures and inferior peoples their lives, nor the disasters,
they may be subjected to as a consequence."
-- Asher Ginzberg, AKA Ahad Ha'am by his Hebrew name.
What Asher Ginzberg said is fascism with a stamp of quality. At certain point,
Hitler, in his book "Mein Kampf" simply repeated the same idea. Except he has
Germans as a superior race, and the lower and despicable are the Jews. Today,
the advanced in the world community have recognized that the Jewish fascism is
much worse and more dangerous than German fascism.
---------------------------------
THAT is the very foundation of ZioNazi, and Nazi ideoology.
---------------------------------
Listen to the sermons of the Jewish communist leader, Leia
Davidovich Trotsky (Bronstein) during the revolution:
"We have to transform Russia into a desert populated with white
niggers, to whom we shall give such a tyranny, that even the
worst despots of the East have never even dreamed of ...
"This tyranny will not be from the right, but from the left,
not white, but red.
"In the literal sense of the word red, as we shall shed such
rivers of blood, before which shall shudder and pale all the
human losses of the capitalist wars ...
"By means of terror and blood baths, we will bring the Russian
intelligentsia to complete stupor, to idiocy, until the
animalistic condition ...
"our boys in leather jackets ... know how to hate everything
Russian!
"What a great pleasure for them to physically destroy the
Russian intelligentsia - military officers, academics, writers"
---------------------------------
"There is Russia's government - Yeltsin, Kiriyenko ... but the main
puppeteer has a long Jewish name
- Berezovsky-Gusinsky-Khodorkovsky-Smolensk, and so on.
Berezovsky:
"That is the first time in a thousand years since the appearance
of the Jews in Russia,
we have the real power in this country ...
Berezovsky: we certainly see that financial power is in Jewish
hands ...
It so happens that all our financial power, and Government
consists of half-Jews Kiriyenko and Chubais.
"... In Germany, when German money ended up in the hands of Jewish
bankers, who thought only about the multiplication of their wealth
and power, there appeared Hitler."
---------------------------------
--- Quote begin ---
Just think about that, which their god Jehovah teaches the Jews - all that is
owned by other peoples, is yours. Such a god and his followers should be
immediately sent to the camps of the Gulag for labor education.
Then Yahweh teaches:
"... will bring you the Lord thy God to the land
whither thou goest to possess it,
and hath cast out many nations before thee,
.. greater and mightier than you,
and will give it to you LORD thy God,
and smite them, then utterly destroy and curse them.
Do not make union with them and do not spare them.
Do not marry them.
And do not come with them in the relationship.
For thou art the holy people unto the LORD thy God ...
And destroy all the nations which the LORD thy God giveth thee ...
no one can stand against thee, until thou have destroyed them."
-- Deuteronomy 7: 1,2,3,6,16,24.
Even Hitler would not come up with such a sick delusion as Yahweh. In
comparison, Hitler, is God's dandelion. I, the warrior, am asking you, Ivan,
the hundred million, and you, a Jew - who is the God of the Jews, whom they
called Yahweh?
Jesus Christ said that the god of the Jews - the Devil, the father of lies and
a murderer of men. Devil is an evil, destruction, darkness, death and
self-destruction. Tell me who is your God, and I will tell you who you are.
"Who you mix with, is what you get filled up with."
You, a Jew, will tell me that it was then, but today we are
different. Let us see then.
1917, The Revolution.
"Heavens opened up with a bang.
And shrieking rushed out of it,
chopping off the heads of churches,
and prasing the Red Tsar,
the newly baked Judas."
-- I. Talkov
Via the Torah and the Talmud, Judens are instructed that any
nation, that warmed the Jews, should be seen as an oppressor,
and should be destroyed. During the 1917 revolution, 90 percent
of the leaders of the Soviet regime consisted of pure Jews, who
changed their Jewish names to Russian. The rest either had a
Jewsish blood in them, or married to Jewish women:
Trotsky - Bronstein,
March - Tsederbaum,
Kamenev - Rosenfeld,
Sverdlov - Gaukhman,
Volodarsky - Kogan,
Martynov - Zimbar,
Litvinov - Finkelstein, etc.
Of the 300 people in the top ranks of the Bolshevik government,
only 13 were Russian.
W. Churchill called "Russian Revolution" a seizure of Russia by
the Jews, who
"Seized the Russian people by the hair and become the masters
of that enormous empire."
West called Russia the "Soviet Judea."
Under the leadership of the two maniacs, Lenin and Trotsky, the
infuriated Russian Zhids created a meat grinder to Russians.
From 1917 to 1934, until the power finally came to Stalin, 40
million Russians were killed. Russia was bleeding to death, and
was choked with Russian blood. The very foundation, the cream
of the crop of Russian society was anihilated. In only 3 years
after the revolution, Lenin's Central Committee has shot more
people, than all of the Romanov dynasty for 300 years.
Listen to the sermons of the Jewish communist leader, Leia
Davidovich Trotsky (Bronstein) during the revolution:
"We have to transform Russia into a desert populated with white
niggers, to whom we shall give such a tyranny, that even the
worst despots of the East have never even dreamed of ...
"This tyranny will not be from the right, but from the left,
not white, but red.
"In the literal sense of the word red, as we shall shed such
rivers of blood, before which shall shudder and pale all the
human losses of the capitalist wars ...
"By means of terror and blood baths, we will bring the Russian
intelligentsia to complete stupor, to idiocy, until the
animalistic condition ...
"our boys in leather jackets ... know how to hate everything
Russian!
"What a great pleasure for them to physically destroy the
Russian intelligentsia - military officers, academics, writers"
Compare the words of Trotsky's bloody texts with those of the
Torah. You will see that the revolutionary Trotsky was a worthy
disciple of Moses, David and the Jewish God, the Devil -
Yahweh. Let the leading psychiatrists read the Old Testament
and the various statements of Trotsky's, and the diagnosis will
be the same - sick psychopaths and sadists.
Stalin was the first, who was able to forcefuly oppose the the
Jewish Bolshevik revolution and the mass destruction of the
Russian people. With help of the new second wave of Jews in the
NKVD and Gulag, he destroyed 800 thousand Jews - mad dogs of
the revolution.
The fact that the Jews destroyed 40 million Russian people, and
destroyed the foundations of Russian State, and are the authors
of the greatest evil in the history of mankind, very few people
know about, as among the Russians, and so among the Jews. The
owners of the Jews seek to hide their evil deeds via any means
possible. But as soon as they hear the name of Stalin, they
begin to foarm at the mouth via all the media and urinate into
their pants in utter horror. Stalin was the leader, even though
with his own shortcomings. In any state, where there was a
leader, or is today, Zhids have no chance. The Leader loves his
country, and will not allow to destroy and rob his people.
Compare the horrors of todays reality in Russia and Ukraine,
with the implementation of the secret plans, as spelled out in
the "Jewish wisdom" only a hundred years ago in the "Protocols
of the Elders of Zion."
This is final plan of destruction, demolition and enslavement
of Russia:
"Not only for profit, but for the sake of duty, for the sake of
victory, we need to stay on course with the programs of
violence and hypocrisy ... we must continue the raging terror,
that leads to blind obedience.
"We need to forever muddy the people's attitudes and
governmental affairs in all the countries, to tire them out
with discord, enmity, starvation, hatred, and even martyrdom,
famine, inoculation with diseases, unending powerty, so that
non-Jews could not see any other way, but to rely on our
financial and total domination.
The need for daily bread will force the non-Jews to remain our
silent and humble servants.
Did you compare the plans of the "Jewish Wisdom" with the
present situation in Russia and Ukraine? So, you see, the
vultures, you have fattened, are doing just fine, thank you. So
far.
But their all-mighty armies of Zhids are beginning to shiver
now, and their jawbones, grinding Russia, have frozen, and
their mouths, sucking the blood from Russia, are icy cold.
Let's listen to what ZioNazis teach the Jews today in the
"Catechism of the ' Russian Jew'":
"When two Russians fight, a Jew wins.
"Create the animocity between Russians, seed and cherish the
envy to each other.
Do it always under the guise of kindness, quietly and subtly.
Let them fight among themselves, because you are forever their
arbiter also.
"Leave all the slogans of Christian charity, humility,
self-humiliation, and self-denial, to stupid Russians.
Because that is what they deserve."
Judaism - is the only religion in the world, which does not
recognize the Charter of Love. Judeans are walking corpses.
They seek knowledge and use their mind to sow death and
destruction.
Wake up, The Russian Strongman, Ivan, the hundred million,
brothers and sisters of mine. Thunder has already struck, it's
time to make a sign of the cross over, and the dark force
senses its own perishment from your hand.
--- Quote end ---
---------------------------------
redux
>In article <ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
><k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>>Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>dog house on top of it was a scream.
>
>>Good old Baby Yar.
>
>Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>in significance.
Baby Yar is where Holocaust memorial has been erected in Kiev,
Ukraine.
In that context, it is entirely appropriate to erect the Russian
Holocaust memorial right on Red Square in Moscow. Except that
memorial would be the memorial to 35 million Russians slauthered,
tortured and anihilated by JioNazis since the ZioNazi revolution
in Russia, which is falsely called "Russian Revolution".
Nope, it was ZioNazi revolution, just as Churchil and plenty
of other most respectable, authoritive authors, researches and
world leaders have called it.
"The time has come to take Russia back from a clique of ZioNazi
criminals agains the mankind, who totally devoured Russia and,
just as Berezovsky stated, 'for the first time in 1000 years,
we [ZioNazis] control Russia'".
The movement started by the former kernel of the elite special
forces, Kwachkov, has spread all over Russia. During the latest
demonstrations in Moscow, the military and special forces
refused to violently disperse thousands of people.
This time, the army and special forces are not going to follow
orders to slaughter their own brothers, sisters, mothers and
fathers following the orders of ZioNazi puppets ruling their
commanders and the entire Russian government.
That goverment is decrared to be outside the law and the charge
against it is Treason.
That government is totally fake. It is a herd of ZioNazi puppets,
following the ZioNazi agenda down to the last dot and comma,
just as ordered by the most vicious, mouth foaming ZioNazis.
------------------------------
"If there arise among you a prophet or a clairvoyant or a seer,
and giveth to thee a sign or a miracle,
and even if that miracle occurs...
then that prophet or a seer is to die ...
"And if thy brother or thy son, or thy daughter,
or thy wife on your bed, or thy friend,
who is for you as your soul ...
shall try to convince you otherwise,
do not feel sorry for him,
but kill him ....
And thou shalt stone him to death with stones."
-- Deuteronomy 13: 1,5,6,8,9,10.
When a Judean learns that in another city they start to think differently:
"strike the inhabitants of that city
with the edge of thy sword,
curse it, and all that is therein,
and strike the cattle thereof,
with the edge of thy sword,
and burn that city down with fire"
-- Deuteronomy 13: 15,16.
All the Torah (Old Testament) and the Talmud are full of hatred, murder,
destruction and blood. His true nature of the Jewish God, the Satan has
transferred to the Jewish people.
Kill anyone who disagrees with you,
who thinks differently, even if it is your relative,
son, daughter or wife.
------------------------------
>... greater and mightier than you,
redux
-----------------------------------------
I will give you some examples of ugliness from the "holy" book, the
Talmud. Treatise Kodashim, Vekorot from" Judea erotica "
by Edwards, p. 130.
"Rabbi Eliezer ben Jacob declared:
"If a rabbi's penis hangs down to the knee,
it is a bad rabbi,
and if it hangs above the knees,
it is a good rabbi."
What IS that? Talmud or delirioum of sex maniacs? Here is
another one:
"Mishnah" p.168
"A girl of three years and one day old
may be betrothed [getting engaged with] by sexual intercourse"
It is clear now, where the perverts and pedophiles came from.
Next wisdom of the Talmud
"Toharot, Niddah:
two of Rabbis, Judah, and Samuel,
are seriously discussing a Talmudic question:
Is it possible to urinate on the roof of the synagogue?
And they found the answer:
it is possible,
but not ON the roof.
FROM the roof.
More from the Talmud, regarding the Jewish respect and decency,
or rather infamy, as to the service in the Army:
"Pezahim.113a" "
.. if you go to a war, go not in the forefront,
but rather in the back,
so that you were the first to return home.
-----------------------------------------
redux
------------------------------------
Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
------------------------------------
Dave Heil
> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
> <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>
>> Good old Baby Yar.
>
> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
> in significance.
>
> Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
> by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
> Isn't it?
>
> That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
> and especially in a laughing manner.
>
> Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
> denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
> issued.
>
> You can get in jail for saying things like these.
Maybe where you are, small thinker.
It is Baba Yar, not Baby Yar, dipshit.
Dave Heil
>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>> Good old Baby Yar.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
>
> Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
>
Let's knock off that crap, shall we?
Wikipedia:
quote
Babi Yar (Russian: Бабий Яр; Ukrainian: Бабин Яр, Babyn Yar) is a ravine
in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took place
on September 29–30, 1941, wherein 33,771 Jews were killed in a single
operation. The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the
military governor, Major-General Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt, the Police
Commander for Army Group South, SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich Jeckeln,
and the Einsatzgruppe C Commander Otto Rasch. It was carried out by
Sonderkommando 4a soldiers, along with the aid of the SD and SS Police
Battalions.
Other victims included thousands of Soviet POWs, communists, Gypsies
(Romani people), Ukrainian nationalists and civilian hostages. It is
estimated that between 100,000 - 150,000 more lives were taken at Babi
Yar.[1]
unquote
Dave Heil
> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>> Good old Baby Yar.
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> I will give you some examples of ugliness from the "holy" book, the
I'd prefer to read the ugliness from Babi Yar.
Dave Heil
> In article<ig3skn$gks$1...@tornado.tornevall.net>, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>> <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>
>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>
>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>
>> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>> in significance.
>
> Baby Yar is where Holocaust memorial has been erected in Kiev,
> Ukraine.
Well, Babi Yar is.
Dave Heil
> <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>
>> Good old Baby Yar.
>
> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
> in significance.
No, little pal, that was "Babi Yar". It was carried out by Nazis
against Jews, Russians and gypsies.
> Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
> by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
> Isn't it?
I'm not a Jew and there is nothing called a ZioNazi.
> That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
> and especially in a laughing manner.
Which part did you find anti-Semitic? When did you join me in defending
Jews?
> Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
> denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
> issued.
>
> You can get in jail for saying things like these.
Can I. I know of no one even arrested in the U.S. for writing anyting
about Baby Yar or Baby anything.
> As far as Holocaust goes, the worst one was carried out by
> ZioNazis during the WWII when 800,000 Jews were destroyed
> just to save 600 ZioNazis and provide them the safe passage
> out of occupied territoris as a result of a deal made by
> ZioNazis and Nazis.
>
> Furthermore, Nazism was created by ZioNazis and simply copied
> by Nazis word by word. It comes directly from "holy" scriptures,
> such as Talmud and Torah. Exept instead of "goyim" to be considered
> a "lower race", and "inhuman" by ZioNazis, Jews were considered
> the same thing by Nazis. Otherwise, the entire Nazi ideology
> comes directly from Eastern Zionists.
>
> Mein Kampf was given to Hitler chapter by chapter to be signed
> as though he wrote it when he was in Jail. He was regularly visited
> in jail by two ZioNazis.
You're out of your friggin' gourd, Pimples.
Eunometic
> >> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4.41...@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
> >> <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Since holocaust denial has effectively been made illegal most of these
claims are not subject to any challenge or critical analysis so we
don't now if or how much of it is Baloney. A lot of it certainly was.
redux
>On 1/6/2011 08 28, redux wrote:
>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave
> Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>
>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>
>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>>
>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
>>
>> Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
>>
>> Rudolf Kasztner was born...
>
>Let's knock off that crap, shall we?
Yep, agreed.
>Wikipedia:
Ok, first of all, you said you are interested in "knocking off
the crap". That means you can not give me the ZioPedia crap.
Because that is what it truly is. CRAP.
It is not an authoritive source on subjects like these at least.
It is a part of global ZioNazi disinformation system,
censored to the last dot and comma.
>quote
>Babi Yar (Russian: Бабий Яр; Ukrainian: Бабин Яр, Babyn Yar) is a
> ravine
>in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
>carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
Well, that is what they tell you at least, right?
But...
Those "Nazis" happen to be ZioNazis and not German Nazis.
Makes a helluva lot of difference.
I do not have neither time nor desire to dig up some quotes
on this at the moment. But who knows...
>The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took place
>on September 29–30, 1941, wherein 33,771 Jews were killed in a single
>operation.
The numbers look in line.
>The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the
>military governor, Major-General Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt, the Police
>Commander for Army Group South, SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich Jeckeln,
>and the Einsatzgruppe C Commander Otto Rasch. It was carried out by
>Sonderkommando 4a soldiers, along with the aid of the SD and SS Police
>Battalions.
>Other victims included thousands of Soviet POWs, communists, Gypsies
>(Romani people), Ukrainian nationalists and civilian hostages. It is
>estimated that between 100,000 - 150,000 more lives were taken at Babi
>Yar.[1]
>unquote
I really do not have time to deal with this right now.
But here is just one bit of information I have on this:
---------------------------------------
Kiev. "Babiy Yar". 34 thousand Jews destroyed. Who was involved in
those executions?
The police chief of Kiev, "the director of the Babi Yar", a lawyer,
Vadim Majkowskis, half-Jew. Not only he was killing the Jews,
but was also robbing them and taking bribes before execution.
His brother, Boleslav Majkowski captain of the SS, operated in the
Baltic region. He destroyed 100 thousand Jews.
---------------------------------------
So...
I would check my records and do more research on this if I were you.
My sources are as good as it gets...
redux
One more time: ZioPedia is not an authoritive source,
especially on the sensitive subjects like this one.
Do better next time, willya?
redux
>On Jan 7, 1:48=C2=A0am, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 08 14, redux wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>redux) wrote:
>> >> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4.41...@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>> >>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>> >>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> >>> McFarland. =C2=A0The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around w=
>ith a
>> >>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>> >>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>
>> >> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>> >> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>> >> in significance.
>>
>> > Baby Yar is where Holocaust memorial has been erected in Kiev,
>> > Ukraine.
>>
>> Well, Babi Yar is.
>>
>> Wikipedia:
>>
>> quote
>: =D0=91=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=B8=D0=BD =D0=AF=D1=80, Babyn Yar) is a ravine
>> in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
>> carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
>> The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took place
>ngle
>> operation. The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the
>> military governor, Major-General Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt, the Police
>ln,
>> and the Einsatzgruppe C Commander Otto Rasch. It was carried out by
>> Sonderkommando 4a soldiers, along with the aid of the SD and SS Police
>> Battalions.
>>
>> Other victims included thousands of Soviet POWs, communists, Gypsies
>> (Romani people), Ukrainian nationalists and civilian hostages. It is
>> estimated that between 100,000 - 150,000 more lives were taken at Babi
>> Yar.[1]
>> unquote- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Since holocaust denial has effectively been made illegal most of these
>claims are not subject to any challenge or critical analysis so we
>don't now if or how much of it is Baloney. A lot of it certainly was.
Definetely so.
I am not exactly an expert on this issue,
but from what I recall seeing, the picture is quite different.
ZioNazis, owning all the Europe among outher things, just shoved
this "law" down the throats of anyone who is interested and willing
to investigate and question some of the ugliest disinformation on
this subject, which violates the "Basic Human Rights Convention"
among other things, such as the Constitution of the USA.
There has never been, in the entire history of Democracy, such
an ugly "law".
This is a huge subject and I have plenty of info on this.
But... I have no time to deal with it right now.
redux
>On 1/6/2011 07 47, redux wrote:
>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>> <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>
>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>
>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>
>> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>> in significance.
>
>No, little pal, that was "Babi Yar". It was carried out by Nazis
>against Jews, Russians and gypsies.
My personal position on this is that the BIGGEST Holocaust by far
was ZioNazis sacrificing hundreds of thousands of Jews during
the WWII, and I am not changing that position.
I could care less what anybody thinks about it.
And even the bigger holocaust was brutal murder of Russians
by ZioNazis, compared to which, Babi Yar simply pales in comparison.
>> Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
>> by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
>> Isn't it?
>
>I'm not a Jew and there is nothing called a ZioNazi.
>> That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
>> and especially in a laughing manner.
>Which part did you find anti-Semitic? When did you join me in defending
>Jews?
To laugh at Babi Yar as you did, you clueless fool.
>> Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
>> denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
>> issued.
>>
>> You can get in jail for saying things like these.
Correct. And that is exactly what YOU did
by laughing at Babi Yar as though it was some bitch.
>Can I. I know of no one even arrested in the U.S. for writing anyting
>about Baby Yar or Baby anything.
>> As far as Holocaust goes, the worst one was carried out by
>> ZioNazis during the WWII when 800,000 Jews were destroyed
>> just to save 600 ZioNazis and provide them the safe passage
>> out of occupied territoris as a result of a deal made by
>> ZioNazis and Nazis.
>>
>> Furthermore, Nazism was created by ZioNazis and simply copied
>> by Nazis word by word. It comes directly from "holy" scriptures,
>> such as Talmud and Torah. Exept instead of "goyim" to be considered
>> a "lower race", and "inhuman" by ZioNazis, Jews were considered
>> the same thing by Nazis. Otherwise, the entire Nazi ideology
>> comes directly from Eastern Zionists.
>>
>> Mein Kampf was given to Hitler chapter by chapter to be signed
>> as though he wrote it when he was in Jail. He was regularly visited
>> in jail by two ZioNazis.
>
>You're out of your friggin' gourd, Pimples.
Nope. I do have information on that one.
dsharavi
Ever read The White Hotel by D.M. Thomas? The penultimate scene takes
place at Babi Yar. Stunning book. (I'd skip the first two sections,
though. Boring soft-porn.)
Deborah
dsharavi
> >>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>
> >> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
> >> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
> >> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>
> >> Good old Baby Yar.
>
> > -----------------------------------------
>
> > I will give you some examples of ugliness from the "holy" book, the
> > Talmud...
The Talmud is about as "holy" a book as a volume from the latest
edition of ORS.
>
> I'd prefer to read the ugliness from Babi Yar.
I wouldn't.
Deborah
dsharavi
And no one is getting through to this shoteh either.
Deborah
redux
>On Jan 6, 6:53=A0am, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 07 47, redux wrote:
>>
>> > In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4.41...@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>> >> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>> >>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> >> McFarland. =A0The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with =
>a
>> >> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>> >> Good old Baby Yar.
>>
>> > Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>> > durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>> > in significance.
>>
>> against Jews, Russians and gypsies.
>>
>> > Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
>> > by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
>> > Isn't it?
>>
>> I'm not a Jew and there is nothing called a ZioNazi.
>>
>> > That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
>> > and especially in a laughing manner.
>>
>g
>> Jews?
>>
>> > Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
>> > denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
>> > issued.
>>
>> > You can get in jail for saying things like these.
>>
>> about Baby Yar or Baby anything.
>>
>>
>>
>> > As far as Holocaust goes, the worst one was carried out by
>> > ZioNazis during the WWII when 800,000 Jews were destroyed
>> > just to save 600 ZioNazis and provide them the safe passage
>> > out of occupied territoris as a result of a deal made by
>> > ZioNazis and Nazis.
>>
>> > Furthermore, Nazism was created by ZioNazis and simply copied
>> > by Nazis word by word. It comes directly from "holy" scriptures,
>> > such as Talmud and Torah. Exept instead of "goyim" to be considered
>> > a "lower race", and "inhuman" by ZioNazis, Jews were considered
>> > the same thing by Nazis. Otherwise, the entire Nazi ideology
>> > comes directly from Eastern Zionists.
>>
>> > Mein Kampf was given to Hitler chapter by chapter to be signed
>> > as though he wrote it when he was in Jail. He was regularly visited
>> > in jail by two ZioNazis.
>>
>> You're out of your friggin' gourd, Pimples.
>
>And no one is getting through to this shoteh either.
Oh, so you ARE a mouth foaming ZioNazi.
Ok, good.
That is what we need here.
Now, where is the comments on the material provided on this
thread in form of quotes?
Or you'd prefer to talk about the ZioNazi insanity?
>Deborah
dsharavi
> Ok, first of all, you said you are interested in "knocking off
> the crap". That means you can not give me the ZioPedia crap.
> Because that is what it truly is. CRAP.
>
> It is not an authoritive source on subjects like these at least.
> It is a part of global ZioNazi disinformation system,
> censored to the last dot and comma.
So find "Baby Yar" on a map.
> >quote
> >Babi Yar (Russian: Бабий Яр; Ukrainian: Бабин Яр, Babyn Yar) is a
> > ravine
> >in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
> >carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
>
> Well, that is what they tell you at least, right?
> But...
> Those "Nazis" happen to be ZioNazis and not German Nazis.
> Makes a helluva lot of difference.
> I do not have neither time nor desire to dig up some quotes
> on this at the moment.
But of course not.
> I really do not have time to deal with this right now.
But of course not.
> But here is just one bit of information I have on this:
> ---------------------------------------
> Kiev. "Babiy Yar". 34 thousand Jews destroyed. Who was involved in
> those executions?
> The police chief of Kiev, "the director of the Babi Yar", a lawyer,
> Vadim Majkowskis, half-Jew. Not only he was killing the Jews,
> but was also robbing them and taking bribes before execution.
From the site: "Message of the Warrior for the Ivan, the hundred
million and the Jew", which includes the articles "World Jewish
authorites on the Jewish satanists", "World authority on the Jewish
satanists", and "Torah and Talmud zombification of the Jews".
"Here is some other events of the Great Patriotic War (WWII):
"Kiev.
"Babiy Yar".
34 thousand Jews destroyed.
"Who was involved in those executions?
"The police chief of Kiev, "the director of the Babi Yar", a lawyer,
the lawyer, half-Jewish Vadim Majkowskis.
"Not only he was killing the Jews, but was also robbing them and
taking bribes before execution. [as those fools were sill hoping
against all hope to buy their lives back]
"His brother, Boleslav Majkowskis captain of the SS, operated in the
Baltic region. He destroyed 100 thousand Jews.
"[Nice teaching of Tora at work, eh?]
"I showed you once again that the Jewish doctrine is evil, death and
destruction, to not only worldwide, but primarily, directly to the
Jewish people."
"No matter what is your nationality, if you adopted the "treasure of
Jewish wisdom," the Torah and the Talmud, you become a Jewish beast,
the butcher of the human kind.
"I, a warrior, am telling you, an ax to the tree of evil has been
already prepaired."
http://oshosearch.net/Convert/zzPoslanie_Voina_51_Translated.html
> I would check my records and do more research on this if I were you.
> My sources are as good as it gets...
But not even quite up to Wiki standards.
The source for the foregoing -- The Message of the Warrior for the
Ivan, the hundred million and the Jew --contains absolutely NO
information on the building of the Pyramids of Giza by Hebrews [i.e.
Jews] or by evil aliens from outer space [i.e., Gou'ald].
Deborah
dsharavi
> One more time: ZioPedia is not an authoritive source,
> especially on the sensitive subjects like this one.
They're still superior to your Chariots of the Gods-type "sources" --
or hadn't you noticed, boy?
Deborah
dsharavi
> I am not exactly an expert on this issue
Truer words were ne'er spoken.
Deborah
dsharavi
> dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 6, 6:53=A0am, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >>I know of no one even arrested in the U.S. for writing anyting
> >> about Baby Yar or Baby anything.
>
> >And no one is getting through to this shoteh either.
>
> Oh, so you ARE a mouth foaming ZioNazi.
Azoy?
> Now, where is the comments on the material provided on this
> thread in form of quotes?
Quotes like these? "The person posting as "Redux" is probably the
densest and most clueless poster to grace these NGs."
Quotes like that?
Hate to rain on your parade, boy, but "quotes" are not, by and in of
themselves, valid facts. Particularly yours.
> Or you'd prefer to talk about the ZioNazi insanity?
Take your meds, first, boy.
Deborah
redux
>On Jan 6, 9:35 am, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> Ok, first of all, you said you are interested in "knocking off
>> the crap". That means you can not give me the ZioPedia crap.
>> Because that is what it truly is. CRAP.
>>
>> It is not an authoritive source on subjects like these at least.
>> It is a part of global ZioNazi disinformation system,
>> censored to the last dot and comma.
>
>So find "Baby Yar" on a map.
"Baby Yar" is the most correct and most closest way to call it.
You have a problem with that?
>> >quote
>> >Babi Yar (Russian: =D0=91=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=AF=D1=80; Ukrainia=
>n: =D0=91=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=B8=D0=BD =D0=AF=D1=80, Babyn Yar) is a
>> > ravine
>> >in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
>> >carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
>>
>> Well, that is what they tell you at least, right?
>> But...
>> Those "Nazis" happen to be ZioNazis and not German Nazis.
>> Makes a helluva lot of difference.
>> I do not have neither time nor desire to dig up some quotes
>> on this at the moment.
>
>But of course not.
>
>> I really do not have time to deal with this right now.
>
>But of course not.
Did you hear what I said?
Just jump from the Golden Gate bridge.
Why suffer unnecessarily?
Beep, beep.
redux
>On Jan 6, 12:24=A0pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>I know of no one even arrested in the U.S. for writing anyting
>> >> about Baby Yar or Baby anything.
>> >> You're out of your friggin' gourd, Pimples.
>>
>> >And no one is getting through to this shoteh either.
>>
>> Oh, so you ARE a mouth foaming ZioNazi.
>
>Azoy?
>
>> Now, where is the comments on the material provided on this
>> thread in form of quotes?
>
>Quotes like these? "The person posting as "Redux" is probably the
>densest and most clueless poster to grace these NGs."
>
>Quotes like that?
>
>Hate to rain on your parade, boy, but "quotes" are not, by and in of
>themselves, valid facts. Particularly yours.
>
>> Or you'd prefer to talk about the ZioNazi insanity?
>
>Take your meds, first, boy.
BOY?
Beep, beep.
>Deborah
>
dsharavi
> In article <f277c46c-9118-48d2-ab36-51ce9959a...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, dsharavi <deshar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Jan 6, 9:35 am, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
> >> Ok, first of all, you said you are interested in "knocking off
> >> the crap". That means you can not give me the ZioPedia crap.
> >> Because that is what it truly is. CRAP.
>
> >> It is not an authoritive source on subjects like these at least.
> >> It is a part of global ZioNazi disinformation system,
> >> censored to the last dot and comma.
>
> >So find "Baby Yar" on a map.
>
> "Baby Yar" is the most correct and most closest way to call it.
> You have a problem with that?
>
You evidently do, boy.
The Nazis created a place of mass murder in the ravine named BABI YAR.
German authorities stationed at Kiev killed thousands more Jews at
BABI YAR.
A large ravine, called BABI YAR (Babi Jar / Ukr.: Babyn Jar), was
chosen as the killing site.
BABI YAR An aerial photograph of the BABI YAR ravine taken by the
German air force.
BABI YAR German soliders search through the belongings of murdered
Jews in the ravine
BABI YAR Another view of murdered Jews
BABI YAR barricades on the corners of Kominterna and Zhilyanskaja
Streets
BABI YAR Belongings of murdered Jews in the Babi Yar ravine
BABI YAR close up of Jewish belongings
BABI YAR Corpses on the sidewalk
BABI YAR Dina Pronicheva, a Jewish survivor of the BABI YAR massacre
We remembert BABI YAR!
BABI YAR: Killing of Kiev Jewry WWII
BABI YAR by Anatoly Kuznettsov, No Gravestone Stands in BABI YAR
BABI YAR is a ravine in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a
series of massacres carried out by the Nazis during their campaign
against the Soviet Union. The most notorious and the best documented
of these massacres took place on September 29–30, 1941, wherein 33,771
Jews were killed in a single operation.
The Nazi forces captured the city in mid-September; within less than a
fortnight, on the 29th. and 30th., nearly 34,000 Jews of the ghetto
were brought to a suburban ravine known as BAI YAR, near the Jewish
Cemetery, where men, women, and children were systematically machine-
gunned in a two-day orgy of execution.
> >> Those "Nazis" happen to be ZioNazis and not German Nazis.
> >> Makes a helluva lot of difference.
> >> I do not have neither time nor desire to dig up some quotes
> >> on this at the moment.
>
> >But of course not.
>
> >> I really do not have time to deal with this right now.
>
> >But of course not.
>
> Did you hear what I said?
Do you realise that news.tornevall.net provides free access to TEXT
ONLY NGs? Do you know what that means?
But of course not.
Deborah
redux
>On Jan 6, 12:51=A0pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> In article <f277c46c-9118-48d2-ab36-51ce9959a...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups=
>..com>, dsharavi <deshar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Jan 6, 9:35 am, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> >> Ok, first of all, you said you are interested in "knocking off
>> >> the crap". That means you can not give me the ZioPedia crap.
>> >> Because that is what it truly is. CRAP.
>>
>> >> It is not an authoritive source on subjects like these at least.
>> >> It is a part of global ZioNazi disinformation system,
>> >> censored to the last dot and comma.
>>
>> >So find "Baby Yar" on a map.
>>
>> "Baby Yar" is the most correct and most closest way to call it.
>> You have a problem with that?
>>
>
>You evidently do, boy.
>
>The Nazis created a place of mass murder in the ravine named BABI YAR.
ZIO-Nazis, not Nazis.
Nazis were simply doing what they were told to do.
Just like you.
>German authorities stationed at Kiev killed thousands more Jews at
>BABI YAR.
There is no German "authorities".
All the authorities are ZioNazis that tell those "authorities"
aka puppets what to do.
But the things are decided in totally different places
than what you are trying to peddle here.
>A large ravine, called BABI YAR (Babi Jar / Ukr.: Babyn Jar), was
>chosen as the killing site.
Get lost. You suck. And suck big time,
you ZIoNazi disinformation peddling whore,
a zombie, a puppet, a "sleeper", whose job it is to do what
you do here, being triggered by the trigger symbols.
Beep, beep.
>BABI YAR An aerial photograph of the BABI YAR ravine taken by the
>German air force.
>
>BABI YAR German soliders search through the belongings of murdered
>Jews in the ravine
>
>BABI YAR Another view of murdered Jews
>
>BABI YAR barricades on the corners of Kominterna and Zhilyanskaja
>Streets
>
>BABI YAR Belongings of murdered Jews in the Babi Yar ravine
>
>BABI YAR close up of Jewish belongings
>
>BABI YAR Corpses on the sidewalk
>
>BABI YAR Dina Pronicheva, a Jewish survivor of the BABI YAR massacre
>
>We remembert BABI YAR!
>BABI YAR: Killing of Kiev Jewry WWII
>
>BABI YAR by Anatoly Kuznettsov, No Gravestone Stands in BABI YAR
>
>BABI YAR is a ravine in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a
>series of massacres carried out by the Nazis during their campaign
>against the Soviet Union. The most notorious and the best documented
>of these massacres took place on September 29=9630, 1941, wherein 33,771
hille...@yahoo.com
So why did Kuznetsov, a native of Kiev, call his book "Babi Yar"?
www.amazon.com/Babi-Yar-Document-Complete-Uncensored/dp/0374528179
Also see http://remember.org/witness/babiyar.html
BABI YAR
By Yevgeni Yevtushenko
Translated by Benjamin Okopnik, 10/96
No monument stands over Babi Yar.
A steep cliff only, like the rudest headstone.
I am afraid.
Today, I am as old
As the entire Jewish race itself.
I see myself an ancient Israelite.
I wander o'er the roads of ancient Egypt
And here, upon the cross, I perish, tortured
And even now, I bear the marks of nails.
It seems to me that Dreyfus is myself.
The Philistines betrayed me - and now judge.
I'm in a cage. Surrounded and trapped,
I'm persecuted, spat on, slandered, and
The dainty dollies in their Brussels frills
Squeal, as they stab umbrellas at my face.
I see myself a boy in Belostok
Blood spills, and runs upon the floors,
The chiefs of bar and pub rage unimpeded
And reek of vodka and of onion, half and half.
I'm thrown back by a boot, I have no strength left,
In vain I beg the rabble of pogrom,
To jeers of "Kill the Jews, and save our Russia!"
My mother's being beaten by a clerk.
O, Russia of my heart, I know that you
Are international, by inner nature.
But often those whose hands are steeped in filth
Abused your purest name, in name of hatred.
I know the kindness of my native land.
How vile, that without the slightest quiver
The antisemites have proclaimed themselves
The "Union of the Russian People!"
It seems to me that I am Anna Frank,
Transparent, as the thinnest branch in April,
And I'm in love, and have no need of phrases,
But only that we gaze into each other's eyes.
How little one can see, or even sense!
Leaves are forbidden, so is sky,
But much is still allowed - very gently
In darkened rooms each other to embrace.
-"They come!"
-"No, fear not - those are sounds
Of spring itself. She's coming soon.
Quickly, your lips!"
-"They break the door!"
-"No, river ice is breaking..."
Wild grasses rustle over Babi Yar,
The trees look sternly, as if passing judgement.
Here, silently, all screams, and, hat in hand,
I feel my hair changing shade to gray.
And I myself, like one long soundless scream
Above the thousands of thousands interred,
I'm every old man executed here,
As I am every child murdered here.
No fiber of my body will forget this.
May "Internationale" thunder and ring
When, for all time, is buried and forgotten
The last of antisemites on this earth.
There is no Jewish blood that's blood of mine,
But, hated with a passion that's corrosive
Am I by antisemites like a Jew.
And that is why I call myself a Russian!
redux
>On Jan 6, 12:51=A0pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> "Baby Yar" is the most correct and most closest way to call it.
>
>So why did Kuznetsov, a native of Kiev, call his book "Babi Yar"?
>www.amazon.com/Babi-Yar-Document-Complete-Uncensored/dp/0374528179
>
>Also see http://remember.org/witness/babiyar.html
You won't be able to understand these things.
You are missing about 99.9% of information.
All you have is a zombie program pretty much.
There are not that many people who really know "the scoop",
just like with anything else.
Do you really need to understand that Baby Yar is?
For what?
What will it buy you?
What will it solve?
Just look at FEMA issue.
That is EXACTLY the same thing as Baby Yar,
except is it MUCH closer to your skin.
All the "baby yars" and concentration camps have already been
built.
And all the "red lists" have already been compiled.
And at least 3 million coffins are already waiting for you.
The same gas chambers as tested by Nazis on behalf of
ZioNazis.
The same gilliotines.
The same portable body burning chambers.
The same chemical weapons.
All waiting for you.
About the ONLY thing that is left is for Obama
to grab a mike and declare the Martial Law.
All the presidential decrees are already in place.
Your "constitution", if you are the "american",
is worth no more than my dead mosquito balls.
And the Russian Bear is waking up finally.
You are doomed, brow.
Angel A
> >www.amazon.com/Babi-Yar-Document-Complete-Uncensored/dp/0374528179
On Jan 6, 1:38 pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
> You won't be able to understand these things.
To be more accurate, *you* can't explain "these things".
Even to yourself.
> You are missing about 99.9% of information.
For some reason I have a feeling that I know history
a little better than you. I don't just listen to propaganda
and assume that it is the whole truth, like you do.
> There are not that many people who really know
> "the scoop", just like with anything else.
The first "writing on the wall" was in Hebrew.
Never forget that.
> Just look at FEMA issue.
> That is EXACTLY the same thing as Baby Yar,
No, it is not.
FEMA was (is?) badly managed, not evil.
> And at least 3 million coffins are already waiting for you.
They can wait, I am not in any hurry.
> About the ONLY thing that is left is for Obama
> to grab a mike and declare the Martial Law.
US citizens have more rifles than the US army.
Remember Boris Yeltsin on the steps of the Russian
Parliament breaking a military coup. There are plenty
of Americans who can do better than that drunk.
> And the Russian Bear is waking up finally.
...giving China a nice clear shot.
Remember no army, attacking from the *west*, could
take and hold Moscow. Napoleon lost his Grande Armee
just to hold Moscow for several weeks. But the *east*
is a different story. It took several generations to
beat the Tatars.
> You are doomed, brow.
The Jews have heard *that* one so many times.
Dave Heil
> In article<8AkVo.18736$sx4....@newsfe02.iad>, Dave Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 08 28, redux wrote:
>>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave
>> Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>>
>>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>>>
>>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
>>>
>>> Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
>>>
>>> Rudolf Kasztner was born...
>>
>> Let's knock off that crap, shall we?
>
> Yep, agreed.
>
>> Wikipedia:
>
> Ok, first of all, you said you are interested in "knocking off
> the crap". That means you can not give me the ZioPedia crap.
> Because that is what it truly is. CRAP.
I've provided nothing from "ZioPedia". My material comes from Wikipedia.
> It is not an authoritive source on subjects like these at least.
> It is a part of global ZioNazi disinformation system,
> censored to the last dot and comma.
The material is accurate and uncensored.
Wikipedia:
quote
Babi Yar (Russian: Бабий Яр; Ukrainian: Бабин Яр, Babyn Yar) is a ravine
in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took place
on September 29–30, 1941, wherein 33,771 Jews were killed in a single
operation. The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the
military governor, Major-General Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt, the Police
Commander for Army Group South, SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich Jeckeln,
and the Einsatzgruppe C Commander Otto Rasch. It was carried out by
Sonderkommando 4a soldiers, along with the aid of the SD and SS Police
Battalions.
Other victims included thousands of Soviet POWs, communists, Gypsies
(Romani people), Ukrainian nationalists and civilian hostages. It is
estimated that between 100,000 - 150,000 more lives were taken at Babi
Yar.[1]
unquote
From About.com:
quote
In Kiev, the Nazis murdered approximately 100,000 people in a ravine
named Babi Yar.
The German Takeover
After the Nazis attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, they pushed
east. By September 19, they had reached Kiev. It was a confusing time
for the inhabitants of Kiev. Though a large portion of the population
had family either in the Red Army or had evacuated into the interior of
the Soviet Union, many inhabitants welcomed the German Army's takeover
of Kiev. Many believed the Germans would free them from Stalin's
oppressive regime. In only days, they would see the true face of the
invaders.
Explosions
Looting began immediately. Then the Germans moved into Kiev's downtown
on Kreshchatik Street. On September 24 - five days after the Germans
entered Kiev - a bomb exploded around four o'clock in the afternoon at
the German headquarters. The Germans were shocked. Then they cordoned
off the area and gathered people in the vicinity as suspects. Then
another building on Kreshchatik exploded. The Germans - and those they
had assembled - fled for safety.
For days, bombs exploded in buildings in the Kreshchatik that had been
occupied by Germans. Many Germans and civilians were killed and injured.
After the war, it was determined that a group of NKVD members were left
behind by the Soviets to offer some resistance against the conquering
Germans. But during the war, the Germans decided it was the work of
Jews, and retaliated for the bombings against the Jewish population of Kiev.
The Notice
By the time the bombings finally stopped on September 28, the Germans
already had a plan for retaliation. On this day, the Germans posted a
notice all over town that read:
All [Jews] living in the city of Kiev and its vicinity are to
report by 8 o'clock on the morning of Monday, September 29th, 1941, at
the corner of Melnikovsky and Dokhturov Streets (near the cemetery).
They are to take with them documents, money, valuables, as well as warm
clothes, underwear, etc. Any [Jew] not carrying out this instruction and
who is found elsewhere will be shot. Any civilian entering flats
evacuated by [Jews] and stealing property will be shot.1
Most people in town, including the Jews, thought this notice meant
deportation. They were wrong.
Reporting for Deportation
On the morning of September 29, tens of thousands of Jews arrived at the
appointed location. Some arrived extra early in order to ensure
themselves a seat on the train.2
A large crowd formed. Each person held onto their family members and
belongings. Children were crying. They couldn't see what was happening
up ahead.
Most waited hours in this crowd - only slowly moving toward what they
thought was a train.
The Front of the Line
Soon after people passed through the gate into the Jewish cemetery, they
reached the front of the mass of people. Here, they were to leave their
baggage. Some in the crowd wondered how they would be reunited with
their possessions; some believed it would be sent in a luggage van.3
The Germans were counting out only a few people at a time and then
letting them move farther on. Machine-gun fire could be heard nearby.
For those that realized what was happening and wanted to leave, it was
too late. There was a barricade staffed by Germans who were checking
identification papers of those wanting out. If the person was Jewish,
they were forced to remain.
In Small Groups
Taken from the front of the line in groups of ten, they were led to a
corridor, about four or five feet wide, formed by rows of soldiers on
each side.4 The soldiers were holding sticks and would hit the Jews as
they went by.
There was no question of being able to dodge or get away. Brutal
blows, immediately drawing blood, descended on their heads, backs and
shoulders from left and right. The soldiers kept shouting: "Schnell,
schnell!" laughing happily, as if they were watching a circus act; they
even found ways of delivering harder blows in the more vulnerable
places, the ribs, the stomach and the groin.5
Screaming and crying, the Jews exited the corridor of soldiers onto an
area overgrown with grass.6 Here they were ordered to undress.
Those who hesitated had their clothes ripped off them by force, and
were kicked and struck with knuckledusters or clubs by the Germans, who
seemed to be drunk with fury in a sort of sadistic rage.7
Babi Yar
Babi Yar is the name of a ravine in the northwestern section of Kiev. A.
Anatoli described the ravine as "enormous, you might even say majestic:
deep and wide, like a mountain gorge. If you stood on one side of it and
shouted you would scarcely be heard on the other."8
It was here that the Nazis shot the Jews.
In small groups of ten, the Jews were taken along the edge of the
ravine. One of the very few survivors remembers she "looked down and her
head swam, she seemed to be so high up. Beneath her was a sea of bodies
covered in blood."9
unquote
There is more at:
Dave Heil
> In article<QBkVo.18759$sx4....@newsfe02.iad>, Dave Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 08 19, redux wrote:
>>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave
>> Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>>
>>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>>>
>>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> I will give you some examples of ugliness from the "holy" book, the
>>> Talmud...
>>
>> I'd prefer to read the ugliness from Babi Yar.
>>
>> Wikipedia:
>>
>> quote
>> ravine
>> in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
>> carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union.
>> The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took place
>> operation. The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the
>> military governor, Major-General Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt, the Police
>> and the Einsatzgruppe C Commander Otto Rasch. It was carried out by
>> Sonderkommando 4a soldiers, along with the aid of the SD and SS Police
>> Battalions.
>>
>> Other victims included thousands of Soviet POWs, communists, Gypsies
>> (Romani people), Ukrainian nationalists and civilian hostages. It is
>> estimated that between 100,000 - 150,000 more lives were taken at Babi
>> Yar.[1]
>> unquote
>
> One more time: ZioPedia is not an authoritive source,
> especially on the sensitive subjects like this one.
It is accurate.
> Do better next time, willya?
I have. There is plenty more at ask.com and www.deathcamps.org
Eunometic
>
> - Show quoted text -
The holohype has become the centerpiece of a new politically correct
religion. It is deliberatly used as an agent of corrosive
decomposiation against the people of European origin.
mirjam
being such a lover of reading books and looking at maps
i would advise you to read if not the book at least the site
http://cf.uba.uva.nl/nl/collecties/kaarten/strijd_om_ruimte/
The map that appears there , and is printed on the Cover of the book ,
is also printed in page 10-11
it is caricatyuristic map painted by a German showing the GERMAN idea
of Europe ..
On page 8 you will see a map drwan in 1945 where Dutch planners gave
theie opinion on which parts of Germany should be annexed to
Holland ..
European maps have for generations , have drawn Other continents with
the writing `NO MAN"S land ,,,`
ask yourself why ?
As to your description of a snake or other creatures drawn on European
maps ,,, we all know that Map Drawing was not so accurate for many
generations , due to lack of plain Geographic knowledge, thus people
invented all kinds of ideas about how the world looks,
One of my many favorites is "Globo Celeste" By Giovanni Cassini, Rome
1792,
34 x 49.5 cm
mirjam
redux
>> >So why did Kuznetsov, a native of Kiev, call his book "Babi Yar"?
>> >www.amazon.com/Babi-Yar-Document-Complete-Uncensored/dp/0374528179
>
>On Jan 6, 1:38 pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> You won't be able to understand these things.
>
>To be more accurate, *you* can't explain "these things".
>Even to yourself.
>
>> You are missing about 99.9% of information.
>
>For some reason I have a feeling that I know history
>a little better than you. I don't just listen to propaganda
>and assume that it is the whole truth, like you do.
>
>> There are not that many people who really know
>> "the scoop", just like with anything else.
>
>The first "writing on the wall" was in Hebrew.
>Never forget that.
You mean the writing on the wall of the room where
Russian Tzar and his entire family were slaughtered?
Yep, it was in Hebrew Allright.
Interestingly enough, it was underlined, which is a symbol
meaning the murderer can not do anything but to do it.
It was beyond his control NOT to do it.
>> Just look at FEMA issue.
>> That is EXACTLY the same thing as Baby Yar,
>
>No, it is not.
>FEMA was (is?) badly managed, not evil.
>
>> And at least 3 million coffins are already waiting for you.
>
>They can wait, I am not in any hurry.
>
>> About the ONLY thing that is left is for Obama
>> to grab a mike and declare the Martial Law.
>
>US citizens have more rifles than the US army.
>Remember Boris Yeltsin on the steps of the Russian
>Parliament breaking a military coup. There are plenty
>of Americans who can do better than that drunk.
>
>> And the Russian Bear is waking up finally.
>
>....giving China a nice clear shot.
drahcir
>In article <3c277772-47c9-480e...@z17g2000prz.googlegroups.com>, dsharavi <dsha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Jan 4, 10:55=A0pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>>> But have you considered this?
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> Leslie Fry
>>> Waters Flowing Eastward
>>> 2.1 How The Protocols Came To Russia
>>> ------------------------------------
>>> The protocols given to the world by Nilus are only the latest
>>> known edition of the Jewish leaders programme. The story of how
>>> the latter came into general circulation is an interesting one.
>>
>> A German by the name Hermann Ottomar Friedrich G=F6dsche, who used also
>>the alias Sir John Retcliffe borrowed a parody written on Napoleon III
>>in 1864, by a French satirican Maurice Joly. After replacing all
>>references to Napoleon with Jews, G=F6dsche published it in 1868 under
>>his name, calling it Biaritz (in English it was called To Sedan).
>>
>>An agent of the Okhrana, the Tsarist Russian secret police, Pyotr
>>Ivanovich Rachovsky, edited the document into its final form in 1895,
>>believing that it would serve as a propaganda tool to rally the
>>Russian masses against the Jews and the Free Masons. A first
>>[abbreviated] version appeared in Russia in 1903, in the paper Znamia.
>>A Russian mystic, Sergei Nilus, included the Protocols as a chapter in
>>a book that he has written in 1905, by the name The Great in the
>>Small: The Coming of the anti Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth.
>>Nilus=92s book was reprinted four times until the revolution of 1917.
>>
>>The full text (in English) of the Protocols, as well as comments and
>>notes, can be found here: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm;
>>and here: http://ddickerson.igc.org/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_=
>>Zion.pdf;
>
>>the time line can be found here: http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?Mo=
>>duleId=3D10007244
>>
>>Two episodes are worth mentioning. The first American version of the
>>protocols appeared in 1920. It was financed by Henry Ford, the known
>>car maker. Later, in 1927, Ford apologized, admitting that it was a
>>forgery. More interesting is a comment found in the diaries of Joseph
>>G=F6bbeles, Hitler=92s propaganda minister, from 1924: =93I believe that th=
>>e
>>Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion are a forgery, However, I believe in
>>the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the Protocols.=94 This
>>statement sounds like the apology offered by the New York Times when
>>Dan Rather was caught reporting bogus news - =93Fake but Accurate=94.
>>http://rslissak.com/content/protocols-strike-again-drisrael-bar-nir
>>
>>Even Herr Schickelgruber knew it was a fake. It didn't stop him from
>>using it, of course.
>>
>>Deborah
>
>Yep, pretty desperate I'd say.
>
>First of all, there exists no evidence to this day to prove protocols
>are not "genuine".
Yikes, idiot, educate yourself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
After you do, get a new brain. When you do, you'll understand that the
evidence must prove VALIDITY, not forgery.
>
>Secondly, the whole argument about "forgery" is just a hoax.
>
>Forgery?
>Of what?
>How can you "forge" something if there is no author?
AAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA. Get a dictionary! You obviously do not undetsand
the meaning of "forgery".
>Are you out of your mind?
>WHO is "forging" whom and for what purpose?
>
>I tell you this: no one less than Russian Tzar commissioned no one
>less than academic Dahl, probably the most respectable and honest
>person that ever walked on the face of this planet with education
>that will boggle not only your monkey ZioNazi mind, but ANY mind
>for that matter, and, after studying the issue for several years,
>Dahl came to a conclusion: yep, this is the real deal.
>
>There is so much evidence of the validity of Protocols that you can
>hardly even begin to imagine to be able to gather such a body of
>evidence of validity of ANYTHING under the Sun.
Couldn't help but notice you didn't cite any.
>
>And the bottom line is this:
>
>Everyone with a functioning brain that studied the issues
>INEVITABLY came to the same conclusion:
>Things in the world happened EXACTLY as outline in the Protocols
>ever since.
>
>Henry Ford said it after 16 years after publication
>and almost 100 years passed and things are STILL happening
>EXACTLY as outline in the Protocols.
>
>Those "forgers" must be sons of God, nothing else,
>to be able to see THAT much in the future.
>
>Don't you think?
>
>:)
Dave Heil
> In article<aIkVo.22372$2G7....@newsfe13.iad>, Dave Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 07 47, redux wrote:
>>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>>> <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>>
>>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>>
>>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>>
>>> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>>> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>>> in significance.
>>
>> No, little pal, that was "Babi Yar". It was carried out by Nazis
>> against Jews, Russians and gypsies.
>
> My personal position on this is that the BIGGEST Holocaust by far
> was ZioNazis sacrificing hundreds of thousands of Jews during
> the WWII, and I am not changing that position.
It doesn't matter what your *personal position* is, only the truth
matters and you are far from the truth.
> I could care less what anybody thinks about it.
The indications are that you want to steer people away from the truth
and toward your alternate version.
>>> Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
>>> by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
>>> Isn't it?
>>
>> I'm not a Jew and there is nothing called a ZioNazi.
>
>>> That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
>>> and especially in a laughing manner.
>
>> Which part did you find anti-Semitic? When did you join me in defending
>> Jews?
>
> To laugh at Babi Yar as you did, you clueless fool.
I laughed at Baby Yar. I never laughed at Babi Yar.
If I was a clueless fool, I'd believe your fairy tales.
>>> Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
>>> denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
>>> issued.
>>>
>>> You can get in jail for saying things like these.
>
> Correct. And that is exactly what YOU did
> by laughing at Babi Yar as though it was some bitch.
I laughed at Baby Yar, which you introduced along with a series of lies
about Babi Yar.
Dave Heil
I'll look for it. Thanks.
Dave Heil
It doesn't matter whether they are Europeans, Arabs or American haters,
they sing from the same songbook.
redux
>On 1/6/2011 17 46, redux wrote:
>> In article<aIkVo.22372$2G7....@newsfe13.iad>, Dave
> Heil<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2011 07 47, redux wrote:
>>>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>>>> <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>>>
>>>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>>>
>>>> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>>>> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>>>> in significance.
>>>
>>> No, little pal, that was "Babi Yar". It was carried out by Nazis
>>> against Jews, Russians and gypsies.
>>
>> My personal position on this is that the BIGGEST Holocaust by far
>> was ZioNazis sacrificing hundreds of thousands of Jews during
>> the WWII, and I am not changing that position.
>
>It doesn't matter what your *personal position* is, only the truth
>matters and you are far from the truth.
Seig Heil!
There is no such a concept as "truth" in ZioNazi ideology as expressed
by Chabad, Torah and their "religious leaders".
There is only gain and supremacy, based on most profound evil that ever
was, mixed with utmost violence, perversions and disgust, blood boiling
hate, murder, robbery, mass slaughter and you name it.
Basically, the ideas of genocide are ZioNazi ideas.
Throughout history, every single act of genocide was conducted by
ZioNazis, no matter what land we are talking about.
Just take foor single example a happy and joyous holiday of Purim
or Kol Nidre prayer.
What do they tell an intellectual giant of your kind?
===== Quote begin =====
Jewish Ritual Sacrifice, murder and Genocide
--------------------------------------------
In the Bible, Isaiah 57:3-5 the prophet, talking of the Jews of
his day says:
"But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of
the adulterer and the whore. Against whom do ye sport
yourselves? against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the
tongue? are ye not children of transgression, a seed of
falsehood, Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green
tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of
the rocks?"
By the phrase, "ye sons of the sorceress," Isaiah calls
attention to the fact that Jewish ritual murder is a black
magic rite. It is customary for the rabbi, as he drinks blood,
to invoke the presence of Satan, who will then presumably carry
out the wishes of the Jews. The drinkers of blood also swear
eternal obedience to Satan during the blood rite.
Isaiah also calls attention to the fact that here the children
are slain "under the cleft of the rocks." This refers to the
Jewish ban against burying the slain gentile child, and to
hiding the body in the rocks in the hopes that the gentiles
will not discover their crime.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, page 653, published in 1904, says:
"The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical
scholars, is that in the last days of the kingdom, human
sacrifices were offered to Yhwh (Yahu, or Jehovah), as King of
Counsellor of the Nation, and that the Prophets disapproved of it."
Yahu also is interchangeable with Baal, the Golden Idol, and
Satan, who is thought to have been a minor god of the Jews, and
an instrument of Baal. The two themes of Jewish history are
blood and gold, and every practice of the Jews is inextricably
bound up with these two factors.
Let me briefly quote Dr. Vladimir Ivanovich Dal from the
above-cited book on these crimes:
"It was not just one group of people who have accused Jews of
committing such deplorable acts; Jews were accused many times
of that in court by a variety of people. On the whole, there
was not only their own confession in addition to other
evidence; but there were such examples where the Jews were
exposed and, consequently, had recognized themselves as being
true. One such event should obviously be enough for people to
acknowledge the real existence of such villainous human
mutilation, but the defenders of Jews say something quite
different: The confession was forced by torture and, therefore,
proves nothing. Assuming, however, this argument is true, too,
and believing all that was ever said and written on this
problem in favor of Jews, with respect to forced confessions,
there is still one circumstance that will remain, which is
never paid enough attention.
This circumstance not only remains as unexplained by Jews but
also is the proof of the crime itself--namely, it is not
doubtful that, from time to time, the corpses of babies, who
were missing, were eventually discovered in such distorted
conditions and with such signs of external violence that they
attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths. This is
the kind of murder for which the Jews are accused. Also, the
incidents of this nature exclusively occurred only in places
where the Jews live. We must ask ourselves: In what type of
circumstance can we attribute the renewed cases of babies who
suffered painful deaths--babies who were carefully tortured up
to the point of their tragic deaths--if an accusation is not
fair? What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a
baby, if it is not done for religious mutilation? The external
signs on corpses indicate each time this is discovered,
positively, that the death could not be accidental in any case
but intentional. And, it is obvious that these injuries
sustained by the babies are deliberately done and take place
over a long time: The whole body is poked or pricked. Then,
scraps of skin are cut.
The tongue was often cut out. The intimate parts of boys are
either cut out, or the boys were circumcised. Occasionally,
other parts of the body are cut out, and the palms are
punctured. Signs of bruises from tight bandages put on and
removed again are not uncommon; often, the entire skin has
abrasions as if it was burnt or had something rubbing against
it. Sometimes, the corpse was even washed, with it being
discovered without any blood in it; nor was there any blood on
the undergarments or clothes, demonstrating that they were
taken off during the murder and, afterwards, put on again. The
parents and siblings of babies who have experienced such tragic
deaths wonder: For what possible reason would people commit
such deplorable acts to innocent babies? Without a purpose, it
could never be done; yet it continues to happen repeatedly over
time. The ordinary killer, in any case, would be satisfied with
one murder. But a murderer who kills for some type of
mysterious, important purpose cannot be rejected here.
The weak, unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the
different tricks of Jews, their impudent and stubborn denial,
not infrequently a bribery, the confidence by the majority of
educated people in that an accusation is merely the infamous
slander and, finally, the humanity of our criminal laws--all
these things saved the Jewish culprits, nearly every time, from
deserved execution. And they--by using their machinations, by
giving false oath assurances of innocence, and by using false
propaganda that suggested such accusations were merely
theresult of accomplished injustice with slander built on
them--almost always were well prepared for such accusations.
The Jews punished those who demonstrated credible evidence
against them. In the year 1817 [in Russia], a law was enacted
on February 28 that the Superior Command announced on March 6:
It was prohibited to even suspect the Jews of such crimes, and
the opinion that the Jews needed non-Jewish blood was called a
prejudice. Meanwhile, an examination of the places where the
secret training of Talmudists took place recognizes the
realization of this mutilation-murder, and the impartial view
put forth in these case productions convinces, without doubt,
the truth of their validity."
One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great
detail by Arnold S. Leese, entitled My Irrelevant Defense on
Jewish Ritual Murder, London, 1938. Addressing the issue of
sacrifices, Mr. Leese states:
"Let a Jew speak for us here: 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was
stated (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1904, Vol. VII, p. 650) to be
'without any religious convictions.' wrote what he himself
described as 'an impartial study of the history and sociology
of the Jews.' calling his book L'Antisemitisme; in the 1904
edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning
the accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder:
'To this general belief are added the suspicions, often
justified, against the Jews addicted to magical practices.
Actually, in the Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the
people as the magician par excellence; one finds many
formulae of exorcism in the Talmud, and the Talmudic and
Cabalistic demonology is very complicated.
Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the
operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great
importance...
Now, it is very probable, even certain that Jewish magicians
sacrificed children; hence the origin of the legend of
ritual sacrifice.'"
Thus Lazare tries to absolve the Jews of the ritual murder
charge by saying that they were guilty, but that it was done
from motives of sorcery, rather than as a key element in the
practice of the Jewish religion. He apparently has not read the
Bible, or noted Isaiah's denunciations of the Jews as sorcerers
and murderers of children. Of course the Jews killed children
during their rites of sorcery, as Lazare admits, but these
horrors were committed as essential rites of the Jewish religion.
Dr. Eric Bischoff, a famous German Jewish scholar, has found
the explicit authorization of the practice of Jewish ritual
murder in the Thikunne Zohar, Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book
of cabalistic ritual, as follows:
"Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing
of strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done
in the lawful (Jewish) method. Those who do not ascribe
themselves to the Jewish religious law must be offered up as
sacrifices to the (Jews) High God (Satan)."
Murders of Christian children by the Jews usually occur during
the important feast-days, Purim, one month before Easter, and
Passover, at Easter. Jewish law prescribes that the gentile
victim at Purim, a Jewish holiday as the Jewish victory over
the gentiles, may be an adult.
Also if no gentile victim can be obtained, dried blood from a
previous victim may be used. However, a Jewish law is quite
specific that the victim at Passover must be a White Child (as
the Whites are the True Israelites, and the Jews know it) under
seven years of age, who must be bled white, crowned with
thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and finally given the last
blow by being wounded in the side, the dagger prescribed to be
in the hands of a rabbi, in a complete re-enactment of the
crucifixion of Christ.
This vindictive ceremony reassures the Jews that even if a few
of the gentiles are alerted to the nature of this people, as
Christ talked against them, the Jews will always win out by
murdering the critic. Consequently, many critics of the Jews
are slain in these terrible ceremonies. In the United States,
perhaps the most famous victim of Jewish ritual murder was the
son of Charles Lindbergh, on March 1, 1932, during the time of
the annual Jewish celebration. Lindbergh's son was chosen
because Lindbergh himself was the most logical person to lead
the gentiles against the Jews. His son was slain as a warning
to him to decline this service. Lindberg's father, a
Congressman, had led the fight against Paul Warburg of Kuhn,
Loeb Co., when Warburg succeeded in getting a subservient
Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act.
The elder Lindbergh had published a book which was burned by
Federal agents during World War I, even though he was a
Congressman at the time. He was well aware of the nature of the
Jewish problem. Now that his son was a world-famous man, after
his feat of flying alone across the Atlantic, the Jews feared
that he might be persuaded to lead a gentile revolt against
their power.
They had already planned World War II, in which Germany was to
be the sacrificial victim, and now they brought in an almost
illiterate German, Gerhart Hauptmann, and convicted him of the
killing. Symbolically, Hauptmann, like Christ, was also a
carpenter, a profession which made him a logical victim for the
Jews.
Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired
him to do some carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills
which proved to be from the Lindbergh ransom money. Although
the existence of Fisch was proven, he could not be located
during the trial. The court was like the one which had
convicted Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews
allowed to be presented. In reality, of course, one cannot
believe anything which is accepted as evidence in an American
court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing
evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges
in all American court rooms. This was also the first of many
efforts of the Jews to vilify the Germans so that America would
be more easily deceived into fighting a Jew's war.
A book entitled The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam, indicates that
the Talmudic god of the Jews [Not the God of Christians] is a blood
loving god:
"The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing
to the lord, viz:
(1) that of Paschal holocaust [Easter sacrifice & the Feast of Purim];
(2) that of circumcision."
According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90,
when performing the operation of circumcision on children, the
mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the circumcision):
"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part
involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he
expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."
Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part
of the ceremony of circumcising Jewish males. According to The
Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, page 99, when performing the
circumcision, the mohel, or circumciser,
"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part
involved in the operation and exerts suction, after which he
expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."
What The Jewish Encyclopedia does not tell us is that this
mixture of wine and blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a
great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such
a weird blood rite, save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in
the deepest jungles of the Congo or New Guinea. Hatred of
Christianity is a tradition among the Jews.
One of the principle feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is
an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in
the Book of Esther of the Old Testament, the only Jewish book
in the entire Bible.
The story, is that Xeroxes, King of Persia, became enamored
with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place
of his rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to
him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the
laws of the land, and obtained from the King an order to slay
them.
Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon
Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon
the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared
for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being
destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's
ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an
exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory
of Haman; and even to this day the Jewish bakers make cakes,
laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of human ears
which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called
"Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and
barbarism of the Jews in our midst.
When a Ritual Sacrifice occurs at Purim, it is usually that of
an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood; the blood is
then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for
eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim
Sacrifice might sometimes be used for the following Passover.
When a Ritual Sacrifice is done at Passover, it is usually that
of a Christian child under seven years old, as perfect a
specimen as possible, who is not only bled white, but
crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns,
tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by
wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The
blood taken from the child is then mixed either in the powdered
state or otherwise into the Passover bread.
Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been
indulged in is Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which
occurs in December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem
under the Maccabees in B.C. 165.
Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions
are also involved, one being the association of
blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have
confessed that Jewry cannot be saved unless every year the
blood of a Christian is obtained for the purpose of ritual
consumption.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a
list of Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against
the Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in
chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in
the 19th century!
===== Quote end =====
redux
Things like Baby Yar are not decided by some feld-marshal.
They are decided at the highest level there is, and at THAT level
they were all ZioNazis.
Such as the world-renowned Otto Adolf Eichmann, a pure-blooded Jew,
chief specialist and executioner of the Jewish people
under Hitler. He was tried and hanged in Israel.
---------------------------------------
* Head of the SS, Himmler, half Jew,
* his right hand, Chief SD Security Officer Hendrych, half Jew,
took part in destruction of millions of Jews,<br>
* the chief of military intelligence Canaris, Jew,
* the Nazi ideologist, Alfred Rosenberg, Jew,
who borrowed all his Nazi ideology from the Torah and the Talmud,
* Rudolf Hess - half Jew,
* Goebbels - 1/4 Jew,
* Hans Frank, who destroyed all the Jews in Poland, half Jew,
the same thing with Adolf Hitler a 1/4 Jew.
---------------------------------------
As far as with whose hands the Baby Yar holocaust was performed,
this is the true information. What you read in ZipPedia, an outlet
for ZioNazi propaganda, is lies and concoctions of the ZioNazi
propaganda machine.
---------------------------------------
Kiev. "Babiy Yar". 34 thousand Jews destroyed. Who was involved in
those executions?
The police chief of Kiev, "the director of the Babi Yar", a lawyer,
Vadim Majkowskis, half-Jew. Not only he was killing the Jews,
but was also robbing them and taking bribes before execution.
His brother, Boleslav Majkowski captain of the SS, operated in the
Baltic region. He destroyed 100 thousand Jews.
---------------------------------------
WASHINGTON, Nov 12th, 2010 -- (Southern Express) The United States
Holocaust Memorial Museum has today officially announced plans for a
new Permanent Exhibition. The existing exhibition is to be dismantled,
packed onto trucks and deposited at the local Washington land fill. It
has been agreed by the Museum Board that the exhibition as it stood,
pales into insignificance when compared to the holocaust currently
being undertaken against Palestinian civilians by Jewish occupational
forces.
The Lidice exhibit, in which a Czechoslovakian town was destroyed and
its citizens butchered in reprisal for the assassination of
Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the Security Police and deputy chief of
the Gestapo has also been moved out to allow for the grisly inclusion
of a new exhibit to be called "Ground Zero at Jenin" which was
ruthlessly destroyed in similar fashion.
A display of German war criminal Adolf Eichmann is to be replaced by
one of Ariel Sharon detailing his atrocities, not only in Palestinian
territories, but also in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon.
<end news update>
---------------------------------------
redux
Called Talmud and Torah?
----------------------------------
Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
Rudolf Kasztner was born to Jewish parents in Transylvania, a
state of Austria which was transferred to Romania. Kasztner
studied and became an attorney, journalist and a leader in the
Zionist youth movement "Aviva Barissia" and "Ha-lhud ha-Olam."
He moved to Budapest in 1942 and joined a local Palestine
Foundation Fund which was a fundraising organization of the
World Zionist Organization. He also held the post of Vice
chairman of the Hungarian Zionist Federation.
Kasztner was in the top management of the Zionist movement and
authorized to negotiate with the German Nazis and make deals
with them. He was accepted by Hitler�s regime as Zionist leader
representing Hungary. Early in WWII, he had open channels to
Henrich Himmler (1900-1945). When Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962)
traveled to Budapest in March 1944, he met with Rudolf and
worked out some deals after Hungary surrendered to Germany
during the war.
In the early days of Hitler�s government, an arrangement had
been worked out between Nazis and Zionists to transfer Jews to
Palestine in exchange for payment to the German Government.
Only a small number of Jews were allowed to escape. Of the
750,000 Jews in Hungary, 550,000 were sent to their deaths in
German extermination camps.
Kasztner did not work alone. Joel Eugen Brand (1906-1964), a
Jew from Transylvania started to work with him in 1943 in
rescuing Jewish refugees. Brand received an message from Adolf
Eichmann to travel to Turkey and convey the message to the
Jewish Agency that Hungarian Jews would be spared and released
in exchange for military supplies.
A meeting took place with the Jewish agency on June 16, 1944.
Brand was arrested by British security forces en route to
Palestine and sent to a military detention center in Cairo,
Egypt. There he was allowed to meet Moshe Sharrett (1894-1965)
the head of the Secret Security Commission of the Jewish Agency
and a high official in the Zionist movement.
The British Government refused to accept the German offer and
the shipment of Hungarian Jews to the death camps began.
However, Kasztner was able to negotiate with Neutral nations,
and some trucks and other supplies were given to the Germans
that resulted in 1,786 Jews being released into Switzerland.
Kasztner�s efforts were marginal compared to the 550,000
Hungarian Jews who died in Germany.
Many of the Hungarian Jews were kept no more than three miles
from the border with Romania and were only guarded by a small
group of German soldiers since Germany was losing a lot of
manpower to the losses against the Allied forces.
There were also very strong underground fighters in Hungary
which could have overpowered the Germany soldiers. Instead of
being warned and helped to flee, Kasztner told the imprisoned
Jews that there was no danger and that they should just be
patient. The Jews trusted their Zionist leadership and sat like
cattle outside a slaughterhouse waiting for their deaths.
Later, after WWII, Rudolf Kasztner was given a government
position in Israel as member of the Mapai party. In 1953, he
was accused by Malkiel Gruenwald of collaborating with the
Nazis and being the direct cause of the deaths of Hungarian
Jews. The Israeli government took it very seriously and tried
to protect Rudolf Kasztner by ordering the Israeli attorney
general to file a criminal lawsuit against Gruenwald!
On June 22, 1955, the judge found that the case against Rudolf
Kasztner had merit and so the Israeli cabinet voted to order
the attorney general to appeal it to a higher court. A vote of
no confidence was introduced in the Israeli Parliament, and
when Zionists refused to support the vote, it caused a cabinet
crisis.
If the truth of the Holocaust came out, it could bring down the
Zionist Movement and threaten the very existence of Israel.
Most Jews didn�t know that the Zionists worked with the Nazi�s.
If the public were informed about the truth, they would react
with horror and outrage. The Supreme Court would have started
its hearings in 1958, but the Zionist movement couldn�t take
the chance being incriminated if Kasztner testified. As a
result, Kasztner was assassinated on March 3, 1957. On January
17, 1958, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the late Rudolf
Kazstner.
Evidence
--------
The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the
Nazi�s was reported in a book called "Perfidy" by an American
born Jew named Ben Hecht (1894-1964). Ben was a staunch
supporter of a Jewish state in Palestine at first but in the
end he became a strong anti-Zionist. His book is a
well-documented expose of the Zionist movement and how the
Zionist Leadership worked with the Nazis in the annihilation of
their fellow Jews to create such a hostile climate in Europe
that Jews had no other option but to immigrate to Palestine.
More evidence
In 1977 Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld published a book called "The
Holocaust Victims." Schonfeld confirmed the writings of Ben
Hecht and wrote that the Zionist leadership was concerned only
in the creation of the state of Israel, not with saving Jewish
lives. The book had photocopied documents supporting the
charges of betrayal against the following three people:
1. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), a Zionist Leader and the first
President of Israel.
2. Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949), a Hungarian born Jew living
in the USA.
3. Yitzhak Grunbaum (1879-1970), a Polish Jew and the chairman
of Jewish Agency, a high leader in the Zionistic movement and
Minister of Interior of the first Israeli cabinet in 1948
Paul Wallenberg was the Swedish ambassador to Hungary. He
arrived shortly after 438,000 Jews were deported from Hungary
to their deaths in German extermination camps. He issued
Swedish passports to approximately 35,000 Jews and made Adolf
Eichmann furious. As the Germans would march Jews in what was
known as death marches, Wallenburg and his staff would go to
train stations and hand out passports to rescue the Jews from
being taken.
This upset Rudolf Kasztner and his Zionist teams because the
goal of the Swedish team was to transport as many Jews as
possible to Sweden as soon as the war was over. This was
contrary to the goals of the Zionist leadership who were
implementing Herzl�s plan.
Any surviving Jews were to be taken to Palestine, not Sweden.
Wallenburg succeeded in bringing out more Jews than
Rudolf Kazstner ever did. When the Soviet army invaded Hungary
in January 1945, Wallenburg was arrested on January 17.
He was charged with espionage and murdered.
Paul Wallenburg had exposed the cooperation of the Zionist
leadership with the Nazis and this was a secret that could not
be let out. Therefore, the Communist/Zionist leadership
eliminated a noble man who had given his all to save Jewish
men, women and children.
When the debate about the Nazis working with the Zionists would
not go away, the Jewish Leadership decided that something must
be done to put the issue to rest. If the gentile population
found out about the dark shadow over the formation of Israel,
it could undermine current and future support for the state of
Israel that cannot exist without the billions of dollars it
receives in aid every year from the United States.
Edwin Black, an American born Jewish writer and journalist was
asked in 1978 to investigate and write a history of the events.
With a team of more than 10 Jewish experts, the project took
five years. The book was named, "The Transfer Agreement," and
it accurately points out a whole list of Jews in the Nazi
leadership but the conclusion innocently states that the
Zionists who negotiated the transfer agreement could not have
anticipated the concentration camps and gas chambers. The book
is very well researched but still doesn�t tell the history of
the Zionist movement and the ideology of Theodor Herzl. Most
importantly, it leaves out Herzl�s words that
"if whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it,
as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created."
Edwin Black�s book is a great documentation, but it is sad that
he and the Jewish Leadership are not willing to face the facts
that the Zionist Leadership was the cause of the Holocaust.
It is even more sad to think that the Jewish people suffered
tremendously during the Nazi regime caused by their own
leadership. They were sacrificed for the cause of establishing
a "kingdom" on earth, which has no place for the God of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Matthew 23:13-15).
Some day in the future the Jewish people will understand that
their Messiah, which their ancestors rejected, was the Son of God.
(Zechariah 12:10-14)
In 1964 a book by Dietrich Bronder (German Jew) was published
in Germany called, "Before Hitler came." The book tried to come
to grips with why the German Jews turned on their own people
and caused so much destruction of innocent people.
The answer given in the book states that the driving force behind
the Jewish Nazis, was the old dream to have a Messiah who could
establish a world rule with the Jews in power. The same
ideology as can be seen in John 6:14-15.
-----------------------------------
Dave Heil
Well, little cockroach, you live in a hell of your own making.
Here's his message header, folks. Go nail him:
Path:
s02-b15.iad!npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!news.tornevall.net!.POSTED!david
From: re...@nowhere.invalid (redux)
Newsgroups: aus.politics,soc.culture.jewish,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: a question for Jew haters
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:00:35 GMT
Organization: TornevallNET - http://news.tornevall.net
Lines: 416
Message-ID: <ig8a21$r0j$1...@tornado.tornevall.net>
References: <hdCdnfmw0c7M4JHQ...@westnet.com.au>
<fa19cc31-1a6a-4ffb...@37g2000prx.googlegroups.com>
<IfWdna52J76kY77Q...@westnet.com.au>
<ig154i$g19$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<ba805d52-e937-4018...@y19g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
<ig35mi$q0u$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>
<ig3skn$gks$1...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<aIkVo.22372$2G7....@newsfe13.iad>
<ig4vnh$md0$4...@tornado.tornevall.net> <hpHVo.40013$Qi5....@newsfe01.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89f7b1302198b4fee66b28220cbf13ef
X-Trace: e60b1ad2f0a7bfc5c792d0bbf032eb10
X-Complaints-To: ab...@tornevall.net
X-Complaints-Language: Spoken language is english or swedish - NOT
ITALIAN, FRENCH, GERMAN OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE!
X-UserIDNumber: 1559
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
X-Validate-Post:
http://news.tornevall.net/validate.php?trace=e60b1ad2f0a7bfc5c792d0bbf032eb10
X-Complaints-Italiano: Non abbiamo padronanza della lingua italiana - se
mandate una email scrivete solo in Inglese, grazie
X-Posting-User: c5220e354381213ccfbe70493664bb8d
Xref: z aus.politics:1454866 soc.culture.jewish:1347486
alt.politics:5768810 alt.conspiracy:817084
X-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:00:17 UTC (s02-b15.iad)
Dave Heil
Path:
s02-b55.iad!npeersf01.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!news.tornevall.net!.POSTED!david
From: re...@nowhere.invalid (redux)
Newsgroups: aus.politics,soc.culture.jewish,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: a question for Jew haters
Message-ID: <ig8b4n$r0j$2...@tornado.tornevall.net>
References: <hdCdnfmw0c7M4JHQ...@westnet.com.au>
<fa19cc31-1a6a-4ffb...@37g2000prx.googlegroups.com>
<IfWdna52J76kY77Q...@westnet.com.au>
<ig154i$g19$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<ba805d52-e937-4018...@y19g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
<ig35mi$q0u$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>
<8ebd41e9-7eba-4aa9...@35g2000prt.googlegroups.com>
<jpHVo.40015$Qi5....@newsfe01.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 322c7b6ee02d15d2681fbbb257396305
X-Trace: 639ecb5fc65f19ece609812b29c03847
X-Complaints-To: ab...@tornevall.net
X-Complaints-Language: Spoken language is english or swedish - NOT
ITALIAN, FRENCH, GERMAN OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE!
X-UserIDNumber: 1559
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
X-Validate-Post:
X-Complaints-Italiano: Non abbiamo padronanza della lingua italiana - se
mandate una email scrivete solo in Inglese, grazie
X-Posting-User: c5220e354381213ccfbe70493664bb8d
alt.politics:5768824 alt.conspiracy:817087
X-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:18:45 UTC (s02-b55.iad)
In article <jpHVo.40015$Qi5....@newsfe01.iad>, Dave Heil
<k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>On 1/6/2011 20 14, dsharavi wrote:
>> On Jan 6, 6:45 am, Dave Heil<k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2011 08 28, redux wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4.41...@newsfe05.iad>, Dave
> Heil<k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>>
>>>>> Not really. I saw her in many or her early movies with Spanky
>>>>> McFarland. The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around with a
>>>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>>
>>>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>>> Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
>>>
>>>> Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
>>>
>>>> Rudolf Kasztner was born...
>>>
>>> Let's knock off that crap, shall we?
>>>
>>> Wikipedia:
>>>
>>> quote
>>> Babi Yar (Russian: Бабий Яр; Ukrainian: Бабин Яр,
Babyn Yar)
> is a ravine
>>> in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres
>>> carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet
Union.
>>> The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took
place
>>> on September 29–30, 1941, wherein 33,771 Jews were killed in a single
>>> operation. The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the
>>> military governor, Major-General Friedrich-Georg Eberhardt, the Police
>>> Commander for Army Group South, SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich
Dave Heil
Path:
s02-b05.iad!npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!195.114.241.41.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!news.tornevall.net!.POSTED!david
From: re...@nowhere.invalid (redux)
Newsgroups: aus.politics,soc.culture.jewish,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: a question for Jew haters
Message-ID: <ig8bbb$r0j$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
References: <hdCdnfmw0c7M4JHQ...@westnet.com.au>
<fa19cc31-1a6a-4ffb...@37g2000prx.googlegroups.com>
<IfWdna52J76kY77Q...@westnet.com.au>
<ig154i$g19$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<ba805d52-e937-4018...@y19g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
<ig35mi$q0u$3...@tornado.tornevall.net>
<ywcVo.76173$wf4....@newsfe05.iad>
<aIkVo.22372$2G7....@newsfe13.iad>
<4fe7b19b-feb8-487f...@35g2000prt.googlegroups.com>
<jpHVo.40016$Qi5....@newsfe01.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 812819ea3a4eac4762074a69b2c4c76b
X-Trace: c08aaedafa7ae1ce5a292bce099b44e6
X-Complaints-To: ab...@tornevall.net
X-Complaints-Language: Spoken language is english or swedish - NOT
ITALIAN, FRENCH, GERMAN OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE!
X-UserIDNumber: 1559
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
X-Validate-Post:
X-Complaints-Italiano: Non abbiamo padronanza della lingua italiana - se
mandate una email scrivete solo in Inglese, grazie
X-Posting-User: c5220e354381213ccfbe70493664bb8d
alt.politics:5768827 alt.conspiracy:817089
X-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:22:18 UTC (s02-b05.iad)
Called Talmud and Torah?
----------------------------------
Jewish-Nazi Cooperation
Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
with them. He was accepted by Hitler�s regime as Zionist leader
representing Hungary. Early in WWII, he had open channels to
Henrich Himmler (1900-1945). When Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962)
traveled to Budapest in March 1944, he met with Rudolf and
worked out some deals after Hungary surrendered to Germany
during the war.
In the early days of Hitler�s government, an arrangement had
been worked out between Nazis and Zionists to transfer Jews to
Palestine in exchange for payment to the German Government.
Only a small number of Jews were allowed to escape. Of the
750,000 Jews in Hungary, 550,000 were sent to their deaths in
German extermination camps.
Kasztner did not work alone. Joel Eugen Brand (1906-1964), a
Jew from Transylvania started to work with him in 1943 in
rescuing Jewish refugees. Brand received an message from Adolf
Eichmann to travel to Turkey and convey the message to the
Jewish Agency that Hungarian Jews would be spared and released
in exchange for military supplies.
A meeting took place with the Jewish agency on June 16, 1944.
Brand was arrested by British security forces en route to
Palestine and sent to a military detention center in Cairo,
Egypt. There he was allowed to meet Moshe Sharrett (1894-1965)
the head of the Secret Security Commission of the Jewish Agency
and a high official in the Zionist movement.
The British Government refused to accept the German offer and
the shipment of Hungarian Jews to the death camps began.
However, Kasztner was able to negotiate with Neutral nations,
and some trucks and other supplies were given to the Germans
that resulted in 1,786 Jews being released into Switzerland.
Kasztner�s efforts were marginal compared to the 550,000
Most Jews didn�t know that the Zionists worked with the Nazi�s.
If the public were informed about the truth, they would react
with horror and outrage. The Supreme Court would have started
its hearings in 1958, but the Zionist movement couldn�t take
the chance being incriminated if Kasztner testified. As a
result, Kasztner was assassinated on March 3, 1957. On January
17, 1958, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the late Rudolf
Kazstner.
Evidence
--------
The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the
Nazi�s was reported in a book called "Perfidy" by an American
implementing Herzl�s plan.
is very well researched but still doesn�t tell the history of
the Zionist movement and the ideology of Theodor Herzl. Most
importantly, it leaves out Herzl�s words that
"if whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it,
as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created."
Edwin Black�s book is a great documentation, but it is sad that
redux
>
>Path:
>s02-b05.iad!npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!f
>eed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-me
>dia.com!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!195.114.241.41.MISMATCH!fee
>der.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!new
>representing Hungary. Early in WWII, he had open channels to
>Henrich Himmler (1900-1945). When Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962)
>traveled to Budapest in March 1944, he met with Rudolf and
>worked out some deals after Hungary surrendered to Germany
>during the war.
>
>been worked out between Nazis and Zionists to transfer Jews to
>Palestine in exchange for payment to the German Government.
>Only a small number of Jews were allowed to escape. Of the
>750,000 Jews in Hungary, 550,000 were sent to their deaths in
>German extermination camps.
>
>Kasztner did not work alone. Joel Eugen Brand (1906-1964), a
>Jew from Transylvania started to work with him in 1943 in
>rescuing Jewish refugees. Brand received an message from Adolf
>Eichmann to travel to Turkey and convey the message to the
>Jewish Agency that Hungarian Jews would be spared and released
>in exchange for military supplies.
>
>A meeting took place with the Jewish agency on June 16, 1944.
>Brand was arrested by British security forces en route to
>Palestine and sent to a military detention center in Cairo,
>Egypt. There he was allowed to meet Moshe Sharrett (1894-1965)
>the head of the Secret Security Commission of the Jewish Agency
>and a high official in the Zionist movement.
>
>The British Government refused to accept the German offer and
>the shipment of Hungarian Jews to the death camps began.
>However, Kasztner was able to negotiate with Neutral nations,
>and some trucks and other supplies were given to the Germans
>that resulted in 1,786 Jews being released into Switzerland.
>If the public were informed about the truth, they would react
>with horror and outrage. The Supreme Court would have started
>the chance being incriminated if Kasztner testified. As a
>result, Kasztner was assassinated on March 3, 1957. On January
>17, 1958, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the late Rudolf
>Kazstner.
>
>Evidence
>--------
>
>The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the
>the Zionist movement and the ideology of Theodor Herzl. Most
>
>"if whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it,
>as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created."
>
>he and the Jewish Leadership are not willing to face the facts
>that the Zionist Leadership was the cause of the Holocaust.
>
>It is even more sad to think that the Jewish people suffered
>tremendously during the Nazi regime caused by their own
>leadership. They were sacrificed for the cause of establishing
>a "kingdom" on earth, which has no place for the God of
>Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Matthew 23:13-15).
>
>Some day in the future the Jewish people will understand that
>their Messiah, which their ancestors rejected, was the Son of God.
>(Zechariah 12:10-14)
>
>In 1964 a book by Dietrich Bronder (German Jew) was published
>in Germany called, "Before Hitler came." The book tried to come
>to grips with why the German Jews turned on their own people
>and caused so much destruction of innocent people.
>
>The answer given in the book states that the driving force behind
>the Jewish Nazis, was the old dream to have a Messiah who could
>establish a world rule with the Jews in power. The same
>ideology as can be seen in John 6:14-15.
>
>-----------------------------------
Yes, I know, when everything else fails,
fall on the ground and cry: I am persecuted by anti-Semites!!!
Grrrrr....
So, who is next here?
dsharavi
Way to go, Angel A. Give it to um.
Deborah
dsharavi
That's fer shure. But who's the composer?
Deborah
redux
>On Jan 6, 4:10=A0pm, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2011 20 17, dsharavi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >> On 1/6/2011 07 47, redux wrote:
>>
>> >>> In article<ywcVo.76173$wf4.41...@newsfe05.iad>, Dave Heil
>> >>>> On 1/6/2011 01 15, redux wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> You think Baby Yar was bad?
>>
>> >>>> McFarland. =A0The one where they pulled the coaster wagon around wit=
>h a
>> >>>> dog house on top of it was a scream.
>>
>> >>>> Good old Baby Yar.
>>
>> >>> Baby Yar was mass slaughter of Jews by ZioNazis in Kiev, Ukraine
>> >>> durind the WWII. It is generaly considered by Jews as Holocaust #2
>> >>> in significance.
>>
>> >> against Jews, Russians and gypsies.
>>
>> >>> Joking about these things and ESPECIALLY by Jews, and ESPECIALLY
>> >>> by ZioNazis of your kind isn't exactly the best thing to do.
>> >>> Isn't it?
>>
>> >> I'm not a Jew and there is nothing called a ZioNazi.
>>
>> >>> That is probably one of the most anti-Semitic things to say,
>> >>> and especially in a laughing manner.
>>
>ding
>> >> Jews?
>>
>> >>> Recently, the laws have been passed regarding the Holocaust
>> >>> denial and hate speech, especially based on nationality related
>> >>> issued.
>>
>> >>> You can get in jail for saying things like these.
>>
>ng
>> >> about Baby Yar or Baby anything.
>>
>> >>> As far as Holocaust goes, the worst one was carried out by
>> >>> ZioNazis during the WWII when 800,000 Jews were destroyed
>> >>> just to save 600 ZioNazis and provide them the safe passage
>> >>> out of occupied territoris as a result of a deal made by
>> >>> ZioNazis and Nazis.
>>
>> >>> Furthermore, Nazism was created by ZioNazis and simply copied
>> >>> by Nazis word by word. It comes directly from "holy" scriptures,
>> >>> such as Talmud and Torah. Exept instead of "goyim" to be considered
>> >>> a "lower race", and "inhuman" by ZioNazis, Jews were considered
>> >>> the same thing by Nazis. Otherwise, the entire Nazi ideology
>> >>> comes directly from Eastern Zionists.
>>
>> >>> Mein Kampf was given to Hitler chapter by chapter to be signed
>> >>> as though he wrote it when he was in Jail. He was regularly visited
>> >>> in jail by two ZioNazis.
>>
>> >> You're out of your friggin' gourd, Pimples.
>>
>> > And no one is getting through to this shoteh either.
>>
>> It doesn't matter whether they are Europeans, Arabs or American haters,
>> they sing from the same songbook.
>
>That's fer shure. But who's the composer?
>
>Deborah
Are you looking for THIS kind of thing?
------------------------------------------
The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion - Analysis</a>
New light on the Protocols
Latest evidence on the veracity of this remarkable documen.
BY W. CREUTZ
The purpose of this article is not to analyse a literary hypothesis
but to solve definitely and for all time, a mystery that is causing
destruction to all the peoples of the world.
Is there a single country that has escaped the depression which has
thrown its sinister shadow on our life since 1929? The statesmen are
seemingly powerless and seek in vain for means to avert the fall of the
nations of the world, into the pit of bolshevism. Our entire Christian
civilization is in danger of going down in smoke and chaos.
How can we check that moral cancer that devours slowly all that is
beautiful and noble in every nation?
How can we save our spiritual inheritance, which is many times more
valuable than all material wealth?
No cure is possible as long as we do not understand the cause of our
ailment; a correct diagnosis must precede the application of the
medicine in order to relieve the sickness which we all observe around
us, but do not comprehend. [AMEN! - Be WISE]
First of all, it should be clearly realized that the crisis in whose
deadly grip we are now overtaken, is not incidental but was carefully
prepared by a gang of powerful criminals. No recovery is possible until
the tools of destruction are taken away from these nefarious poison
mixers of the universe.
Adolph Hitler realized this. A howl of rage from all corners of the
world was the answer to his quick action - but he tore the burning fuse
from the bomb set to explode in the summer of 1933.
And but for this quick action, Germany today would be suffering the
tragic lot of Russia.
This article must not be considered as the product of "religious
intolerance of the middle ages," nor as an attempt to stir up pogroms
and persecution, as the greater part of the world press, would like to
bave you believe, in order to mislead public opinion at the behest of
Judah.
No, we certainly do not recommend anything that can appear so gruesome
and unjust. All that we demand, is the elimination in all countries, of
those persons in key positions, who do not merit confidence. Such an
unavoidable housecleaning was performed in Germany, to the relief of the
population, after its long period of suffering.
From now on, the truth cannot be concealed. Facts carefully hidden by
obscure conspirators are now common knowledge among sixty million people.
Conscienceless criminals have decided to destroy the existing order of
the whole world and to impose upon it the rule of a Satanical Messiah.
The yeast is fermenting. In many countries there are men who perceive
the impending danger and work in the direction of uniting forces for he
struggle against the common enemy. There will be no obstacles in the way
of creating friendly relations among Christian Gentile nations as soon
as traitors, who cause continuous friction, are eliminated.
The truth will come out into the daylight and all who will struggle
against it, will be ground down, and this is the truth which must be
loudly proclaimed. The depression was deliberately planned for a certain
hour and had been directed carefully and groomed, through decades by
criminals obsessed with the lust for power, murder and greed.
The actual program was drawn up about 40 years ago and was first
revealed in print, in a small pamphlet known as "The Secrets of the
Learned Elders of Zion."
The first two editions of this remarkable book were published in 1901
and 1905. They quickly disappeared from circulation and attracted little
or no attention. One copy nevertheless reached the British Museum in
1906 and was catalogued under the number 3926 D. 17.
The London "Times" stated on August 17, 1921:
"These documents attracted only a little attention before the
Revolution of 1917. The astounding breakdown of a great state due to
attack by Bolshiviks and the presence of countless Jews among them, had
the result that many people were looking for - reasonable explanations
of the catastrophe. The "Protocols" furnished this explanation,
especially as the tactics of the Bolsheviks at many points, were
identical with the recommendations of the "Protocols."
The "Protocols" were published in many countries although powerful
efforts were made to prevent their publication.
One edition dated 1917 (in German) bears the title "The
Jewish-Danger;" it attracted much attention. Public opinion
became excited through the sudden revelation of this hellish
conspiracy for the destruction of the Christian Civilization.
The "Morning Post" of London devoted several columns to this
subject. A sensational article appeared in the "Times" of May 8,
1921, from which the following quotation was taken:
"What do they mean, those "Protocols?" Are they Genuine? Has a
gang of criminals really drawn up such plans and is triumphing
over their fulfilment? Are they a forgery? But how can one
explain then this terrible prophetic gift that foretold all this
before hand? Did we fight all these years to destroy the world
power of Germany only to find ourselves now facing a much more
dangerous enemy? Have we saved ourselves through enormous
efforts from PAX GERMANICA only to fall a victim to PAX JUDAICA?"
The "TIMES" concludes this article with the following significant
words:
"If the "Protocols" were written by the Learned Elders of Zion
then everything that was attempted and done against the Jews, is
justified, necessary and urgent"
Some weighty words!
Is there any wonder then that the powerful influences against which
this terrible indictment is directed, made all possible efforts to bring
this document into discredit?
Clever steps were undertaken to prove that the "Protocols" were
forgeries. The Jews have again and again disputed their authenticity.
There is still pending in the Courts of Berne, Switzerland, in which a
publisher is accused of defamation for his allegations as to the
genuineness of the "Protocols." The Jewish plaintiffs demand the Court
brand the document a forgery and thereby prohibit its circulation by the
publisher.
"FORGERY"
---------
London "Times" disinformation:
On the 16th, 17th and 18th of August 1921 the London "Times"
published a series of articles in which it asserts that the
"PROTOCOLS" are only a clumsy fraud produced by a conscienceless
plagiarist who paraphrased a book published in Brussels in 1865.
That book called "DIALOGUES IN HELL" is reported to be written by
a "Frenchman" named Maurice Joly.
The "Times" published several passages from both books in parallel
columns thus proving beyond any doubt the spiritual kinship between
them. The forgery version seemed to be well established.
The "Times" emphasized carefully its standing in regard to the
Jewish press as being absolutely non-partisan and pretended to
have exposed this "remarkable forgery" for the sake of the truth
only, as it was very important that this "LEGEND" of the
"PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION" shall disappear as
soon as possible and for ever.
Indeed so, since the matter in question is of tremendous
importance! The last of these articles terminated with the
following words:
"The fact that we have to do with a plagiarism, only, is
definitely established. Let the "Legend" now become a matter of
the past."
But this pious wish failed to materialize. There are many
circumstances that make it impossible to accept the assertion of
the "Times" as a final decision. Something is rotten in Denmark
.. And if we investigate we make some interesting discoveries.
We are far from doubting the "non-partisanship" of the "Times,"
but the "NATIONAL TIDSCRIFT" of Oslo, Norway, in its July issue
1922, reports that a certain JEWISH banker acquired the control
of the "Times" at the time when the last mentioned series of
articles appeared. This statement to our knowledge was never
refuted.
The "Times" explains that the "Forgery" was discovered
"accidentally." If true then it was a very lucky "ACCIDENT,"
considering the great importance of the question involved.
According to the "Times" a "correspondent" in Constantinople
became acquainted, by mere luck, with a certain Russian.
(Wishing to remain incognito, he was referred to as "Mr. X,")
This mysterious stranger handed the correspondent of the "Times"
the particular booklet by Joly which made it possible to
discover the "Forgery."
The whole story seems to be somewhat dark and romantic. In fact
anyone may become a correspondent of a newspaper by simply
writing a letter. No evidence was produced that this
correspondent ever was in Constantinople and met a Russian
there. The identity of "Mr. X." was never revealed.
Why so much mystery about it? If a "very important matter" is at
stake, wouldn't it be simpler to produce those two star
witnesses? The names of the two gentlemen rightly deserve to be
the possession of posterity, especially in consideration of the
tremendous service rendered to Israel.
Thanks to those two gentlemen, public opinion was cleverly
focused away from the "PROTOCOLS", Such valuable service should
not remain unrewarded.
The "Correspondent" hinted that the "Forgery" was concocted with
the purpose of influencing the conservative Russian Court
against the Jews bv rendering to the imaginary "Jewish Peril,"
the aspect of reality. But no evidence what-so-ever was produced
in this respect.
How did the long since forgotten Joly book find it's way to
Russia? That problem was never solved. Several untenable
theories were advanced. The mind of the reader was switched at
lightning speed from Constantinople to St. Petersburg and from
Corsica to London... so that the brave British "Goyim" became
dizzy and unable to keep in step, remaining far back in
ignorance. The game was won!
The "Times" proclaimed triumphantly that "indisputable evidence"
was produced!!!
Is that so? How wonderful...
Now, if this watered "evidence" is properly scrutinized and
subjected to distilation the only solid substance that is left
is the fact that one of the books represents an overwriting and
further development of the other one.
Under these circumstances can the ugly word "Forgery" be applied?
A further development and widening of a certain text can not be
classified as "Forgery," otherwise every preacher who quotes a
passage from the Bible without mentioning the verse and chapter
would also be considered as a forger and plagiarist.
Such a conclusion is simply ridiculous when we consider that the
Holy Scriptures contain many parallel passages.
We respectfully invite the attention of the Honorable Elders of
Zion to the following passages of the Holy Scripture: II. Kings
18,14 (also preceding verses) as compared to Isaiah 36. The text
is nearly identical. Also I. Moses 36,31 (and preceding verses)
as compared with word to word reproduction in I. Chron. 1,43.
Suppose that the above passages were printed in parallel columns
(as was the case with the "Protocols" and the book of Joly) the
result would be just as convincing that one of the Scriptures is
a paraphrase of the other.
Would this justify the statement that a clumsy fraud was
concocted and that one of the Scriptures was a forgery?
It is evident that since Moses is the author of I. Book of Moses
and the book I. Chron. is attributed to Ezra and Nehemiah and
since certain places of the last book indicate that it was
written after the Captivity of Babylon or about 860 years after
the death of Moses, that in line with the logic of the "Times,"
Ezra and Nehemiah, are also "Plagiarists" if the uniformity of
the text is to be considered a "Forgery."
Those who with us believe that the Holy Scriptures were inspired
by God, who can commit no mistakes, will welcome this uniformity
as proof of the Almighty's wisdom. This uniformity has a certain
purpose - it shall furnish in the "Last Days" the all smashing
argument against the hords of Anti-Christ. [AMEN! -BeWISE]
It is as clear as daylight that no plagiarism was committed
whether from the Holy or Satanical writers. They were using in
their writings material with which they were familiar beforehand.
Shall the Rabbis continue to insist on a "forgery" then also
their own Prophets shall be accused as they committed the same
"crime."
Now let us continue our investigation. The path we are following
is getting warmer - we step on dangerous soil! Let us find out
who is the gentleman identified as Maurice Joly; the mysterious
correspondent (from Constantinople) "incidentally" paid no
attention to his identity.
Who was this "Frenchman," the author of the "Dialogues in Hell?"
This problem is solved by Gottfried zur Beck in his preface to
the German edition of the "Protocols." In which we find that
Maurice Joly, according to the record, in his infancy was
circumcised as Moses Joel!
How strange!
Israel is doing its utmost to prove that the "Protocols" were written
with the purpose of bringing the jews into contempt - and now there is
evidence that this satanical plan as outlined in both of these books has
the same Jewish heart and the same jewish mind as a source of origin.
Manifold Proofs
---------------
The highly remarkable book "Waters Flowing Eastward" by L. Fry
contains much valuable information regarding Maurice Joly (Moses
Joel). In the "Memoirs of Rene Mareuil," (one of the members of
the Ministerial Cabinet of Polignac of France) is stated that
Maurice Joly was born in 1831 and was employed in 1848 in the
ministry at Chebreau as a minor employee.
The young man was strongly influenced by Adolph Israel Cremieux
(the founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle.) Later he
became a communist and was jailed for two years. In 1878 he
committed suicide and at his burial the Jew Gambetta (former
prime minister of France) delivered a post-mortem speech.
It should be remembered that Gambetta played a certain part in
the French commune, that Bolshevik reign of terror that existed
in France from March 18th to May 29th, 1871, during which time
Paris was robbed and ruined. Nevertheless, by a most remarkable
"coincidence none of the 145 houses owned by Alphonse Rothschild
were damaged.
What are the conclusions that can be drawn from the foregoing
information? They are:
1. The Jewish author that furnished the inspiration for the
"Protocols" did not confine himself to nefarious theories; he did not
hesitate to apply them practically in criminal actions.
2. The "Protocols" have nothing whatsoever to do with the Russian
Secret police, as the "Corrrespondent" of the "Times" infers.
3. The "Dialogues" are not a creation of an anti-semite, but on the
contrary they represent the Quintessence of Jewish Idealism.
4. The satanical development of ideas of this book is extracted from a
still older work, thus proving Joly to be a plagiarist himself.
"The Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" is the title of
this older book, published by Franz Duncker at Berlin in 1850. The
author of this book was the Jew Jacob Venedey. He was born in 1805 in
Cologne, Germany; expelled from Germany he settled in Paris in 1835...
Prosecuted by the police for his subversive activities, he was protected
and defended (as was the case with Joly) by Cremieux. Venedey was an
intimate friend of Karl Marx (alias Jew Mordechai).
With Marx's assistance he organized in 1847 "The Communist Workers
League. In 1843 he visited England and organized another secret society
having as a purpose the promotion of Israel's World Domination.
Thus it is definitely proved that both books that served as a
foundation for the "Protocols," were written by Jews, both of whom were
friend of the founder of the "Alliance Israelite Universelle," ADOLPH
ISRAEL CREMIEUX.
Under these circumstances it can not be doubted that all three books
are the product of Jewish thought.
Anyone who will study carefully these books should be very much
surprised to hear the Jews whining about Jews being innocently
persecuted and forced to defend themselves against "Lies & Defamation."
There can be no talk about "Forgery" whatsoever, as we have to do only
with slightly different versions of "ideas" coming from the same
powerful political and economical circle of influence.
The secret society that was organized by Karl Marx and Venedey was in
fact only an outgrowth of an older Jewish organization known as "The
Jewish League for Culture and Education," which already existed in 1819.
The program for this league was taken over by A. Cremieux and further
developed.
One easily understands the "Aims" of this "leaque" if he reads
carefully the letter written by the Jew Baruch Levy to Karl Marx. Here
is what he writes:
"The Jewish people taken collectively will be its own Messiah.
His reign over the Universe will be obtained by the unification
of the human races and through the elimination of frontiers. A
Universal Republic will come into being in which the Sons of
Israel will become the directing element. We know how to
dominate the Masses. The governments of all nations will
gradually fall, THROUGH VICTORY OF THE PROLETARIAT, INTO THE
HANDS OF JUDAH. All private property will become the possession
of the PRINCES OF lSRAEL - they will own the wealth of all
lands. Thus will be realized the promise of the TALMUD that when
the time of the Messiah comes the Jews will hold under their
keys the property of all the peoples of the world."
The spiritual relation between this letter and the "Protocols"
is exactly the same as between an acorn and an oak.
This dreadful plan is transmitted into action in our midst every
day.
The "Pan-Europa" a periodical of Count Coudenhove-Calergi
proclaimed that the Aristocracy of the future will be Jewish.
(In the "New York Times" of April 14, 1933, Samuel Untermyer
made a statement to the same effect, claiming that the Jew is
the Aristocrat of the world. -Editor.)
The character and behavior of this new "Aristocracy" is
substantially different from the old. The names of Bela Kun
(Cohen), Kurt Eisner as well as the Jew-Soviet "Nobility" will
be written for all time in world history in letters of blood.
An interesting article appeared in the newspaper "Die Front"
published in Zurich, Switzerland on January 3, 1934, which
reported that a group of Jews, more powerful and more
influential than the Zionists, has organized a "Cultural
Movement" on a world-wide scale with the purpose of putting
every country under Jewish domination.
Always the same leading idea - not the slightest variation in
the program.
The French magazine "Libre Parole" in its issue of November
1933, page 27, and earlier "La Vielle France" issue of March 10,
1921, published a remarkable speech of Rabbi Reichhorn delivered
in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of the Grand Rabbi
Simeon-ben-Ihuda; he said in part:
"For centuries the Sons of Israel have been despised and
persecuted, but they have fought bravely to prepare the way for
victory. Now they are approaching their aim.
They already dominate the economic life of the damned
Christians; their influence is just as great in politics and in
moral fields. At the wished for hour, fixed in advance, we shall
let loose the Revolution, which by ruining all classes of
Christians will definitely enslave Christendom to us. Thus will
be accomplished the promise of God made to his people."
This promise is already accomplished in Russia. What country
will be next to experience the same tragic fate? [WOW! -TRY A
HOST OF OTHERS SINCE THESE PROPHETIC WORDS WERE WRITTEN IN THE
1930'S!! AND OUR TURN IS COMING SOON IF THE "MASSES" DON'T WAKE
UP NOW!!-BeWISE]
In a recent issue of the Jewish publication "Freurid von Israel"
the editor deplores the fact that the modern Jewish youth seems
to have disrespect towards God and his laws. He says, "the
Godless Jew seems now to be the master of all Jewish powers.
Israel runs the danger of becoming a Satanical race."
A remarkable acknowledgement! This utterance is not made by an
anti-semite but by a leader of a Jewish mission!
The danger is, in fact, grave. Israel has ceased, to believe in
Jehovah and is worshipping the Golden Calf only.
Historical Facts
A Jewish Weekly 'Judische Pressezentrale," published in Zurich,
Switzerland, claims in its issue of December 1 5, 1933, that the
"Protocols" were fabricated by the Russian secret police in 1905
shortly after the Japanese war.
It is unwise to defend a cause by simply insisting on something,
that could easily be proved false. How is it possible that a
document, which existed 20 years previously, in three languages,
could be concocted in 19O5 - a document with which several
persons were already familiar?
That Jewish assertion is simply ridiculous.
It has been convincingly proved that the "Protocols" were
written first in Hebrew, then in French and last in Russian.
The "Protocols" represent a strategical plan, an assembly of
authenticated documents, which were kept secret for a long time.
That new edition, which attracted so much attention throughout
the whole world was compiled and edited by the KAHAL, the secret
Jewish Government.
L. Fry says that the actual editorial work was done by ASHER
GINZBERG, also known as ACHAD-HA-AM. This important person (also
used to be known locally in Odessa as "King of the Jews"
-Editor) was one of the four Jews who forced Balfour to make
known the declaration of November 2, 1917., through which the
Jews obtained a "National Home" in Palestine. Herewith they
achieved one of the "Aims" contained in the "Protocols."
This evidence is of paramount value!
ASHER GINZBERG was born in the township of Skvira, Government of
Kieff, Russia in 1856, the son of a Jewish tax collector. He
received an excellent Talmudic eduction. Early in life he became
prominent in Jewish literature for his articles, which he signed
Ahad-ha-Am.
GINZBERG settled in Odessa, Russia in 1886, residing in Yamskaya
Street. In 1889 he organized a secret society known as "B'nai
Moshe" (Sons of Moses). The meetings of this secret society were
held in his house. Among the first members were: Ben Avigdor,
Zalman Epstein, Louis Epstein and Jacob Eisenstaat.
It is through persons who lived in Odessa at that time that
information was obtained that a manuscript of the "Protocols" in
the Jewish language was circulated among the Jews.
The Jew BERNSTEIN, publisher of the "FREE PRESS" of Detroit,
Michigan, admitted in the presence of William Cameron secretary
to Henry Ford, that HE HAD PERSONALLY READ THE "PROTOCOLS" IN
THE JEWISH LANGUAGE IN ODESSA.
Now let us follow up the destiny of the French translation. One
copy of the 'Protocols" was kept in the Masonic Lodge of "Miz.
raim." One member of this lodge, the Jew Joseph Schorst - alias
Shapiro - became a traitor to his race and sold the document for
2,500 francs to Miss Justina Glinka daughter of a Russian
General. This lady who was employed by the Russian foreign
intelligence service, sent the French copy together with the
Russian translation to General Orgensky in. St. Petersburg, with
the request to pass it on to her superior General Cherevin, who
was the Minister of the Interior and whose duty it was to take
action accordingly.
But, as regretful as it may appear now, Gen. Cherevin was deeply
entangled financially with rich and powerful Jews and did not
dare to fulfill such a dangerous mission. He pigeonholed the
document in his archives, where it was found after his death in
1896.
The Jew Schorst was obliged to flee for his life, but was
murdered in Egypt.
In the meantime invisible enemies were persecuting Miss Glinka.
She was framed and fell into disfavor with the Tsars Court and
was finally exiled to her estate in the Government of Orel.
There she met the Governor General of this district, ALEXIS
SUKHOTIN and handed him a copy of the Protocols, pointing out
that SYPIAGUIN (another Minister of the Interior) had been
murdered for attempting to check the Jewish Revolutionary
activities.
Sukhotin showed the document to two friends, STEPANOFF & NILUS.
The former circulated it privately in 1897; the second Professor
Sergius Nilus, published it in 1901.
This information is mostly drawn from L. Fry's work: "Waters
Flowing Eastward." It is corroborated by a statement made by
Philip Stepanov, Chamberlain, Privy Councillor and former
Procurator of the Holy Synod at Moscow; it is witnessed by
Prince DIMITRI GALITZlN.
This evidential document, delivered on April 1 7th 1927, has
been photographically reproduced, and the writer of these pages
owns a copy of it. Stepanov states he received the M. S. of the
Protocols in 1895 from Major Sukhotin. He had them printed
privately and gave a copy to A. T. KELEPOVSKY, chief of Grand
Duke Sergius' household. After reading them, the Grand Duke
sighed and murmured; "TOO LATE!" He was assassinated shortly
afterward.
It has been often asserted that the "Protocols," which are a
strategic plan for the conquest of the world and domination by
Israel were read at the First Zionist Congress in 1897 at Basle,
Switzerland. The Jews always deny it most vigorously and use as
an argument the fact that the official record of the Congress
makes no mention of it. That sort of argument has no value at
all, when one takes into consideration that the furious
differences between Ginzberg and Herzl were also not mentioned
in the record. The officially published record is incomplete and
does not possess any convincing power in that respect.
Only a few participants at that Congress are still alive; one of
them Marcus Ehrenpriss the chief Rabbi of Stockholm, Sweden,
explained in the "Judisk Tidskrift" no. 6, 1926, that the
triumph of Israel was prophetically foreseen by Hertzl 20 years
ahead.
Thirty million Christians were sacrificed in the World War - but
the Jewish aims were achieved. Russia was destroyed; the "Peace
came without Victory;" all sides were impoverished - and
Palestine was handed to the Jews! (The next war which is now in
preparation shall lead to the complete downfall of the Goyim.)
The secret-record of the Zionist Congress in Basle was secured
by the Russian Government through the efforts of secret service
man Ratchkovsky, who bought it from two Jews Eno Asev and Rabbi
From. The latter sought later security in a monastery in
Jugoslavia, where he died in 1925.
When the secret record of the Basle Congress was examined by the
Russian police it was discovered to their great surprise that
the acquired documents were identical with the "Protocols.
Ratchkovsky died suddenly under' "mysterious circumstances,"
shortly after making an important report to the Chief of
Gendarmes, General Kourloff. Kourloff was convinced that
Ratchkovsky was murdered.
Professor Nilus was subjected to inhuman tortures by the Cheka
[rulled by ZioNazis] and died in 1929.
All these circumstances form a chain of steel links, each of
which can be checked up. The witnesses introduced are not
unknown adventurers, but are educated and trustworthy persons of
high social rank.
We really feel obliged to ask the "Judische Pressezentrale" to
explain; how was it possible for all those persons to read,
translate and circulate documents ten, fifteen and twenty years
before they were composed?
The Jews pretend that the "Protocols" were concocted by two
members of the secret police of Russia. Suppose, but the whole
prophetical program has since turned into reality!!!
How was it possible for two minor police officials to alter
completely the face of the whole world, to overthrow thrones and
to destroy empires? How did they succeed in accumulating all the
gold of the world in their hands, to ruin entire nations and to
muzzle the press? ? ?
"Camouflage"
------------
The very essence of the Jewish Danger is hidden in that one
word. No other artifice yields so much profit as the art of
"camouflage."
The "Goyim" are so pathetically gullible in that respect - a new
name is sufficient to make a gentleman out of a criminal.
Camouflage is a very recent invention. If Nero could have
thought of this brilliant idea and had changed his name to
Socrates his reputation would doubtless have been as clean and
spotless as that of Mr. Finklestein-Litvinoff!
When that "famous" diplomat was pompously received first by the
Prime Minister of Great Britian and later by President Roosevelt
all "delicate" subjects were carefully avoided.
Twenty-five years ago that "Guest of honor" was arrested at the
Gare du Nord in Paris by police inspector Guichard for
circulating stolen bank notes. Those bank notes were obtained
during an armed robbery in Tiflis; bombs were exploded and
terrific fire from automatic pistols catised the death of fifty
persons. The robbers obtained one million roubles.
If Mr. MacDonald and Mr. Roosevelt care to have a suitable
souvenir of their guest, all they have to do is to ask the Paris
police for his fingerprints.
There are, no doubt, in England and America, some old fashioned
people who are shocked by such "visitors" and deeply ashamed of
such affiliations.
A powerful movement to the contrary is developing in this
country, but is perceptible only by the most keen observers; it
grows daily and is bound to assume tremendous proportions soon.
The Jews have spotted it already - their fine sense of
observation tells them that something has changed.
Recently Rabbi Shulman of Chicago speaking before a large
audience expressed himseif as follows:
"The Jews become anxious on account of a precedent set up by
Hitler, which might also be followed by other countries. The
Jews are being accused of having caused the depression. They are
afraid of their lives as nobody can tell whether or not some day
the great extermination of the Jews will break out."
That is just the great danger! It is written: An eye for an eye
and a tooth for a tooth (2nd. Moses 21, 24) and "They have sown
the wind and will reap the storm." (Hosea 8, 7.)
Those prophetic words should be remembered by all true
Christians with anxiety. We want Justice which does not exclude
Mercy, but no vengeance and no physical violence.
The problem today is: how to save the Aryan peoples from the
claws of the Jews.
Tomorrow another complicated problem arises: how to save the
Jews from the vengeance of the Gentiles?
The Program
-----------
Now that we have produced ample evidence on the authenticity of the
"Protocols" - we will give for the benefit of the reader, a short
synopsis of the gigantic strategical plan. The persons who are not as
yet awake to the great conspiracy for the destruction of Christian
Civilization should study it carefully and realize the great danger
impending.
They should examine minutely the "bait" that is laid out for them and
let us hope they will have enough common sense not to swallow it. One
can never be sure of it anyway as many prefer to continue to sleep
quietly instead of straining their brains. "Kismet!" There is no God's
law for the saving of the imbecile.
Here is the plan invented by the "Learned Elders of Zion," the master
program laid down in the "Protocols."
"WE SHALL":
1. Seduce and demoralize the youth with false doctrines.
2. Destroy the family life.
3. Dominate humanity by Preying upon their lower instincts and vices.
4. Debase and vulgarize Art, and introduce filth in Literature.
5. Destroy respect for religions; undermine the reputation of
the clergy through scandalous stories and back up the so called
"Higher Criticism" so that the old fundamental faith is shattered
and quarrels and controversies become permanent in the churches.
6. Introduce the habit for luxuries, crazy fashions and
spendthrift ideas so that the ality for enjoying clean and plain
pleasures is lost.
7. Divert the attention of the people by public amusements,
sports, games, prize contests, etc., so that there is no time for
thinking.
8. Confuse and bewilder the minds of the people by false
theories and shatter the nerves and health by continuously
introducing new poisons. (Alcohol, Nicotine, Drugs, Demineralized
foods, etc. -Editor.) 9. Instigate class hatred and class war
among the different classes of people.
10. Dispossess the old Aristocracy, which still keeps up high
traditions by excessive taxes and replace it with the "Knights of
the Golden Calf."
11. Poison the relations between the employees and employers
through strikes and lockouts so as to ruin the possibility of
productive co-operation.
12. Demoralize by all means the higher classes of society and by
adverse publicity raise the hate of the people toward them.
13. Use industry to ruin agriculture and then in its turn
destroy industry by wild speculation.
14. Spread all possible utopian theories so as to bring the
people into a labyrinth of impractical ideas.
15. Raise the rate of wages, which however will not bring any
advantage to the workers for at the same time we shall produce a
rise in the price of the first necessities of life.
16. Cause diplomatic friction and misunderstanding between
States which will increase international suspicions and hate
thereby greatly augmenting armaments.
17. Introduce in all states, general suffrage so that the
destiny of nations depend upon ignorant people.
18. Overthrow all monarchies and substitute republics for them;
in so far as possible fill important state offices with persons
who are involved in some unlawful affair and who will, from fear
of being exposed, remain our obedient servants.
19. Gradually amend all constitutions so as to prepare the
soil for absolute despotism and Bolshevism.
20. Establish huge monopolies upon which even the great fortunes
of the Gentiles will depend to such an extent that they will be
swallowed up at the "hour" when the industrial crisis will start.
21. Destroy all financial stability; increase economic
depressions to the extent of bringing a general world bankruptcy;
stop the wheels of industry; make bonds, stocks and paper money
worthless; accumulate all the gold of the world in the hands of a
certain few people thus withdrawing tremendous capital from
circulation; at a given hour close all the exchanges, withdraw all
credits and cause general panic.
22. Prepare the death struggle of the nations; wear out humanity
through suffering, fear and shortage of food - hunger creates
slaves!!!
That is the program!
The chief element necessary for the success of this plan is "Secrecy."
Therefore the invisible enemy has taken special precautions for keeping
humanity in ignorance of their systematic efforts in preparing THE
KINGDOM OF ANTI-CHRIST.
Indeed everything was foreseen in that program and nothing disregarded.
Was the "Times" justified or not in saying:
"If the "Protocols" were really written by the Learned Elders of Zion,
then everything that was attempted and done aganst tbe Jews, is
justified, necessary and urgent".
Conclusion
----------
The "Hidden Hand" is exposed; its game is lost as it can act only in
the darkness. Will Judah admit its defeat or will it continue to fight?
The proud dream of World Domination has faded out as the main condition
of success consisted in taking the world by surprise. The Russian Giant
was asleep as well as deeply wounded, but Germany which happened to be
very much awake to the danger, sounded the alarm which keeps ringing in
all corners of the world.
It is not between "Berlin" or "Moscow" that humanity has to choose
today but betwecn CHRIST and ANTI-CHRIST. There can only be two camps;
the one of the "God-fearing" and the other of the "Godless." In these
two camps there is plenty of room for all races and nations.
The good ones in any nation should fight and suppress the wicked ones.
How can it be achieved?
With possibly a single exception there will be hardly a newspaper in
the world which will have the courage to print this message.
But still and all the whole power of Judah is not sufficient to
prevent this message from spreading like an electric spark from pole to
pole. All over the world a new generation is arising which did not bend
its knee before the "Golden Calf." This generation will clean out the
"Angean Stables" - from the governments by all nations it will drive out
the jittering political old men with evil smelling pockets.
The stolen billions shall be again distributed for the welfare of the
suffering people. Friendly cooperation shall replace fruitless rivalry.
A "National Home" for the Jews shall be created in a distant place on
the globe where the Jews can work among themselves and prove to the
world that they can make good. The confiscated money will richly pay for
the general Jewish repatriation in the "New Palestine." The "Goyim"
which have been bought by Jewish money may follow their masters into
exile. That would be just and not expensive.
A deep breath of liberation will then be released by the whole
suffering world. A mountain of trouble will fall from its shoulders! [End]
REMEMBER: The "Protocols" must be STUDIED, not merely read.
Unfortunately the tone can get a bit harsh in revealing these
Truths. BeWISE would like to re-emphasise that we are in no way blaming
every single individual Jew for this NWO push. That would be ridiculous
and wrong since we actively work with many precious Jews all across the
world. We are clearly pointing out that this push for global control as
laid out in the Protocols comes mainly from the Jewish LEADERS and their
cronies - their politically correct "yes men" ... However, it is a
FACT that many Jews are used willingly by these diabolical leaders and
their agendas as are many other people ... and that is sad ...
In fact, BeWISE just received yet another surprising
CONFIRMATION of what we post on this Site from a former high-level
rabbi who rejected the LIES of Judaism and accepted Christ. He
stated to us verbally and quite directly:
"I am now 100 percent convinced, without a shadow of
any doubt whatsoever, that the entire world is being run and
manipulated by non-believing Jews.
WOW! We have complete documentation of this incredible
revelation by this precious and courageous man.
------------------------------------------
redux
<b28ad4d6-b35c-4d5b...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, Angel A
<angel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >www.amazon.com/Babi-Yar-Document-Complete-Uncensored/dp/0374528179
>
>On Jan 6, 1:38 pm, re...@nowhere.invalid (redux) wrote:
>> You won't be able to understand these things.
>
>To be more accurate, *you* can't explain "these things".
>Even to yourself.
>
>> You are missing about 99.9% of information.
>
>For some reason I have a feeling that I know history
>a little better than you. I don't just listen to propaganda
>and assume that it is the whole truth, like you do.
>
>> There are not that many people who really know
>> "the scoop", just like with anything else.
>
>The first "writing on the wall" was in Hebrew.
>Never forget that.
Was it a threat along these lines:
---------------------------------
Assassinations
--------------
Assassinations is subject of immense significance. It would take
libraries to cover the issues, names, situations, ideology and
"religious" background. In Russia alone ZioNazis have murdered 35
million people during the "communist" revolution, which is a
ZioNazi project, based on "supremacy" of Judeans as described in
their "holy scriptures" of Talmud an Torah and the very idea of
"chosen people".
The amount of assassinations and terrorist acts they have
performed during the history and to this very moment is simply
mind boggling. It is not that far fetched to claim that every act
of assassination or terrorism on any significant level is nothing
more than a result of their "agenda" since the ancient times,
just as recorded in Talmud and Torah and throughout the history.
Whenever you hear some "mad man" have committed a horrible murder,
keep in mind the ritual murder aspect of Judaic tradition and
their thirst for blood. Yes, indeed, some "mad" puppet is usually
used to carry out an act of murder and to hide the hand leading
him, financing him and his puppeteers and things of that nature.
If you think "mad" people just go out and murder someone, think
again. It is just the other way around. Those people, in absolute
majority of cases, are some the most innocent people there are.
When you deal with murder, you are likely to be dealing with
the issues of degeneracy, which is a huge subject by itself.
Gregory Klimov has studied this subject for 50 years of his life
and he wrote a number of books about degeneracy, especially
related to ZioNazi degeneracy as a phenomenon.
Following is the list of ZioNazi monsters, you can not even call
them people, whose hands are in blood up to their elbows, who
murdered and tortured to death 35 millions of Russian people.
Their particular attention was on the cream of the crop of
Russian intelligentsia, scientist and other creative people,
wast majority of whom were murdered in cold blood or tortured
with the most horrific tortures known in the entire history
of mankind, only ZioNazis could ever conceive, just as their
blood thirsty "scriptures" dictate them.
Here is an overview of this monstrosity of a phenomenon:
"The Red Terror became so wide-spread that it is impossible to
give here all the details of the principal means employed by the
[Jewish] Cheka(s) to master resistance; one of the most important
is that of hostages, taken among all social classes. These are
held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist movements (revolts, the
White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest
etc.) and are immediately executed.
"Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the
Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them
were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women
suffered before death various tortures inflicted by cold-blooded
cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.
"I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff, in the
presence of the Allied Missions, immediately after the Reds had
abandoned the town; they consist of a series of ghastly
reproductions such as:
"Bodies of three workmen taken as hostages from a factory which
went on strike. One had his eyes burnt, his lips and nose cut
off; the other two had their hands cut off.
"The bodies of hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch, small
landed proprietors, who were scalped by their executioners;
S. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a white hot sword
blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former officer, who had his
tongue and one hand cut off and the skin torn off from his left
leg.
"Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means of a
metallic comb. This sinister find was the result of a careful
inspection of the cellar of the Extraordinary Commission of
Kharkoff. The retired general Pontiafa, a hostage who had the
skin of his right hand torn off and the genital parts mutilated.
"Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a
drapery business, Mme. A.L. Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo.
Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and
emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.
"Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle,
Sevenetry, and Sidorfehouk, with atrociously mutilated faces, the
genital parts having been operated upon by Chinese torturers in a
manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the agony
caused to the victims must have been dreadful.
"It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery which the
Red Terror took. A volume would not contain them. The Cheka of
Kharkoff, for example, in which Saenko operated, had the
specialty of scalping victims and taking off the skin of their
hands as one takes off a glove... At Voronege the victims were
shut up naked in a barrel studded with nails which was then
rolled about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot iron
FIVE POINTED STAR. At Tsaritsin and at Kamishin their bones were
sawed...
At Keif the victim was shut up in a chest containing decomposing
corpses; after firing shots above his head his torturers told him
that he would be buried alive. The chest was buried and opened
again half an hour later when the interrogation of the victim was
proceeded with. The scene was repeated several times over. It is
not surprising that many victims went mad."
(S.P. Melgounov, p. 164-166; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution,
by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 151-153).
The following is a list of some top Jewish Communist murderers,
commissars, spies, assassins and propagandists (aliases are
listed in parentheses). This list is by no means comprehensive.
To catalog all of the Jewish communists involved in crimes would
require hundreds of pages.
V.I. Lenin,
supreme dictator, the godfather of "Russian" revolution.
"Lenin, or Oulianov by adoption, originally Zederbaum, a
Kalmuck Jew, married a Jewess, and whose children speak Yiddish."
(Major-General, Count Cherep-Spiridovich, The Secret
World Government, p. 36)
"Lenin, as a child, was left behind, there, by a company of
prisoners passing through, and later his Jewish convict father,
Ilko Sroul Goldman, wrote inquiring his whereabouts.
Lenin had already been picked up and adopted by Oulianoff."
(D. Petrovsky, Russia under the Jews, p. 86)
"Lenin was born on April 10, 1870 in the vicinity of Odessa,
South of Russia, as a son of Ilko Sroul Goldmann, a German Jew,
and Sofie Goldmann, a German Jewess. Lenin was circumcised as
Hiam Goldmann."
(Common Sense, April 1, 1963)
Leon Bronstein (Trotsky):
supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army.
He was one of the primary ideologists in the whole revolutionary
movement and his views on rerrorism, murder and assassinations
are simply mind boggling. There are books of evidence, written
by some of the most authoritive investigators and researchers,
such as Eduard Hodos, Gregory Kilmov and plenty of others.
Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev):
executive, Soviet Secret Police.
Solomon Lozovsky:
deputy Soviet foreign minister.
Maxim Wallach (Litvinov):
Soviet foreign minister.
Yuri Andropov:
director, Soviet KGB, later supreme dictator of the Soviet Union.
Jacob Sverdlov:
first president of the Soviet Union.
Sverdlov ordered the massacre of the Czar's family; women and
children, in the town named after Catherine the Great,
Yekaterinburg, (renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in honor of the
murderer).
Jacob Yurovsky:
commander, Soviet Secret Police.
Yurovsky led the death squad which carried out Sverdlov's order
for the murder of the Czar's family, including the bayoneting to
death of the Czar's daughters. The Ipatyev house, where, in the
basement, the massacre had occurred, stood intact until 1977,
when the local Communist party boss at that time, Boris Yeltsin,
ordered it demolished, lest it become a shrine to anti-Jewish
sentiment.
Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich:
chief mass murderer for Stalin.
Ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of
Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral
of Christ the Savior. Standing amid the rubble of the cathedral,
Kaganovich proclaimed:
"Mother Russia is cast down. We have ripped away her skirts."
(N.Y. Times, Sept. 26, 1995).
Mikhail Kaganovich:
deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor
of slave labor, brother of Lazar.
Rosa Kaganovich:
Stalin's mistress; sister of Lazar.
Paulina Zhemchuzina:
member of the Central Committee and wife of
Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov.
Olga Bronstein:
officer, Soviet Cheka Secret Police, sister of
Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.
Genrikh Yagoda:
chief of Soviet Secret Police,
mass murderer extra ordinaire. (Jewish poet Romain Rolland,
winner of the Nobel Prize, wrote a hymn of praise to Yagoda).
Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel:
founders, the Gulag death camp system.
Lev Inzhir,
commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration.
Boris Berman:
executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother
of Matvei.
K.V. Pauker:
chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police. Firin,
Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk:
commissars of death camps and slave labor,
supervised the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of
the White Sea; Baltic Canal.
M.I. Gay:
commander, Soviet Secret Police.
Slutsky and Shpiegelglas:
commanders, Soviet Secret Police.
Isaac Babel:
officer, Soviet Secret Police.
Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Alexander Orlov):
commander, Soviet Red Army; officer, Soviet Secret Police.
Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the Spanish Civil War. He
supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and peasants in Spain.
Yona Yakir:
general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee.
Dimitri Shmidt:
general, Soviet Red Army.
Yakov ("Yankel") Kreiser:
general, Soviet Red Army.
Miron Vovsi:
general, Soviet Red Army.
David Dragonsky:
general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union.
Grigori Shtern:
general, Soviet Red Army.
Mikhail Chazkelevich:
general, Soviet Red Army.
Shimon Kirvoshein:
general, Soviet Red Army.
Arseni Raskin:
deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army.
Haim Fomin,
commander of Brest-Litovsk, Soviet Red Army.
At least one hundred Soviet generals were Jewish (cf. Canadian
Jewish News, April 19, 1989). Generals who were not themselves
Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among these were:
Marshal Voroshilov,
Marshal Bulganin,
Marshal Peresypkin and
General Pavel Sudoplatov
(Sudoplatov assassinated hundreds of Christian leaders including
Ukranian Catholic Archbishop Teodor Romzha).
This Jewish wife "insurance policy" extended to Politburo members
such as Andrei Andreyev and Leonoid Brezhnev. Sergei Eisenstein:
director of communist propaganda films which depicted Christian
peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The
kulaks were subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein's
Bezhin Meadow).
[In order to control the world's most prominent members of
government, military or any other people of influence,
ZioNazis utilize a strategy of making sure they can marry
a Jewish wife, through which they can be controlled.
A majority of world's "elite" throughout times since Torah
and Talmud is married to Jewish women.]
Komzet: commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on
land seized from murdered Christians in Ukraine; funded by
Jewish-American financier Julius Rosenwald.
Ilya Ehrenburg,
Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of anti-German
hate material dating from the 1930s.
Ehrenburg instigated the Soviet Red Army rape and murder of
German civilians. Referring to German women, Ehrenburg gloated to
the advancing Red Army troops, "that blonde hag is in for a bad
time."
In a leaflet addressed to Soviet troops, Ehrenburg wrote:
"...the Germans are not human beings... nothing gives us so much
joy as German corpses." (Anatol Goldberg, Ilya Ehrenburg, p. 197).
Goldberg concedes that Ehrenburg,
"...had always disliked the Germans. ..now that there was a war
on he turned his old prejudice into an asset." (Ibid., p. 193).
Another publication distributed to the Red Army, this time as the
soldiers approached Danzig, was described by a historian:
"Millions of leaflets were air-dropped on the troops with a
message composed by the propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg and signed by
Stalin:
'Soldiers of the Red Army! Kill the Germans! Kill all Germans!
Kill! Kill! Kill!" (Christopher Duffy, Red Storm on the Reich).
The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the
extermination of the entire German people (cf. Pravda, April 14,
1945. [Pravda was also published in a Yiddish edition, Einikeyt).
Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize. He willed
his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem 'Holocaust' Museum.
Solomon Mikhoels:
commissar of Soviet propaganda.
Soviet film propagandists:
Mark Donsky, Leonid Lukov, Yuli Reisman, Vasily Grossman,
Yevgeny Gabrilovich, Boris Volchok and Lillian Hellman
(old movies written by her continue to be broadcast on
American television).
Yevgeny Khaldei
Soviet propagandist
who staged the photo of the
raising of the hammer and sickle flag over the Reichstag in
Berlin, May 2, 1945. Afterward, a special plane was waiting to
fly Khaldei, Stalin's top Tass photographer, to a Moscow lab,
where his photo was further doctored (loot displayed on one of
the Soviet soldier's wrists was removed in the negative and
Khaldei added clouds and smoke to the scene for dramatic effect
(see photo of Khaldei and his beloved flag at left).
Khaldei continued to work as a premier Soviet propagandist until
his retirement from Pravda in 1972. His Communist propaganda is
proudly on display at the Jewish Museum of New York and the
Jewish Museum of San Francisco. N.Y. Times writer Vicki Goldberg
exulted in the raising of the blood-drenched Soviet flag, emblem
of the slaughter of millions of peasants and Christians;
describing it as, "...a national (and worldwide) symbol of
triumph, justice and revenge." (Jan. 31, 1997, p. B-26).
Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC):
new form of the Bolshevik Yevkom, Stalin's recruiting conduit for funding
money, supplies and
political influence for Soviet Russia from world Jewry as well as the
dissemination of
gas chamber atrocity propaganda (cf. The Black Book).
Nikolai Bukharin:
Lenin's chief theorist.
Samuel Agursky:
commissar.
Karl Radek:
member, Central Committee.
Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin):
commissar.
A. A. Yoffe:
commissar.
David Ryazanov:
advisor to Lenin.
Lev Grigorievich Levin:
physician, poisoner of Stalin's enemies.
Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev):
member of the Central Committee.
Ivan Maisky:
Soviet Ambassador to Britain.
Itzik Solomonovich Feffer:
commissar, Soviet Secret Police.
Abraham Sutskever:
Soviet terrorist-partisan.
Mark Osipovich Reizen:
Soviet propagandist, winner of three Stalin Prizes.
Lev Leopold Trepper:
Soviet espionage officer.
Bela Kun (Kohen):
supreme dictator of Hungary in 1919. Kun was later Stalin's chief
terrorist in the Crimea. Kun's eventual successor was Matyas
Rakosi, Jewish Communist mass murderer of Christians in Hungary.
According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 14, 1997,
Jews "...played key roles in ushering Communist rule into
Hungary. In fact, during the brutal oppression of the early
1950s, the regime's top five leaders were Jews."
Zakharovich Mekhlis:
top executioner for Stalin.
Henrykas Zimanas:
leader of Lithuanian communist terrorists, butcher of Christians.
Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade):
commander, Yugoslav Communist People's Army. Tito's top butcher
of hundreds of thousands of Croatian Christians. Pijade later
served as president of the Yugoslav Communist Parliament. At
least eighteen generals in the Yugoslav Communist People's Army
were Jewish.
The Yugoslavian communist party sent massive arms shipments to
Jewish fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.
In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Jewish
communists: the torturer Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret
Police; the Politburo commander Jacob Berman and commissars Mine,
Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski.
These men murdered or deported to Kolyma and the other Arctic
death camps, tens of thousands of Catholic Poles.
According to Jewish researcher John Sack,
"In 1945 many Poles felt (and not without reason) that Jews ran
the Office of State Security... the chief of the Office was Jacob
Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department heads were
Jews."
Sack reports that 75% of the officers of the Communist Secret
Police in Silesia were Jews. He noted that many Jews in the
Communist terror apparatus in Poland changed their names to
Polish ones like General Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski, Capt.
Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. John Sack, The New Republic,
Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6).
Sack in this article also refutes some shoddy research performed
by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of Hitler's Willing
Executioners, who, in the double standard typical of the Jewish
mentality, refuses to accept the proven fact that Jews ran the
Polish Communist secret police even as Goldhagen asserts the
racist myth that the entire German nation was guilty of genocide.
Sack does a good job of proving Goldhagen wrong about Poland). In
Poland,
"...a disproportionate number of Communists were Jews. In 1930,
at its peak, 35% of the members of the party were Jewish.
In Communist youth organizations, Jewish membership was even
higher, while Communists of Jewish origin occupied most of the
seats on the central committee. Communism appealed to some Jews
because it opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than any other
Polish party...
Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years immediately
after World War Two, when the party leadership was totally in the
hands of the prewar Communist leadership that abhorred
anti-Semitism." (Sheldon Kirshner, The Canadian Jewish News, Nov.
5, 1992, p. 16).
Of course when one encounters the issue of Jews, Communists and
Catholics in Poland in the Establishment media or universities
today, the mass murder of the Polish Catholics at the hands of
the Jewish Communists, is never raised. Instead, a minor attack
on Jews by Polish peasants enraged at the role of Jews in
Communist terror, which occurred in July, 1946 at Kielce and
which has come to be called the "Kielce pogrom" will be the
centerpiece of the "discussion."
The motivation for the attack is not usually mentioned. Rather,
the Catholic peasantry are painted in terms of "fiendish bigots"
whose "blind, irrational hate" for the "poor, persecuted Jews"
resulted in "yet another martyrdom of God's Chosen."
But the Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal Hlond, a
brave prelate in a stalwart tradition of Christian resistance to
Jewish tyranny in Poland, so different from the traitorous philo-
Judaism of the current Pontiff, stated that the attack in Kielce
occurred because of resentment 'due to the Jews who today occupy
leading positions in Poland's (Communist) government and endeavor
to introduce a governmental structure that the majority of Poles
do not wish to have." (Ibid., Kirshner).
As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observes, "The average
Pole could not but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most
powerful men in the country; Berman and Mine, were both Jewish as
was the dreaded security official Rozanski." (N.Y. Review of
Books, Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).
With this record it is interesting to note that the Polish
occupant of the papacy, John Paul II, consistently lent his
prestige and his presence to canonizations and commemorations of
politically correct victims of the Nazis.
Nowhere did this Pope breath a word about the openly Jewish,
Communist massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics,
Croatian Catholics, Lithuanian Catholics-he was too busy,
intoning the Shoah, referring to the heirs of the Pharisees as
"our Elder Brothers in the Faith" giving official recognition to
an Israeli state which even many orthodox, Haredi rabbis regard
as a blasphemous and abominable entity, and attacking the German
people as "the image of the beast."
Solomon Morel:
commandant of a post-war Communist concentration camp for Germans
in Poland. Stalin deliberately put Jews in charge of such camps.
Morel tortured and murdered thousands of Germans, sometimes with
his bare hands (cf. "The Wrath of Solomon," Village Voice, March
30, 1993 and John Sack, An Eye for an Eye).
Morel is comfortably ensconced in Tel Aviv.
German survivors of Morel's camp have demanded he be tried as a
war criminal, but for the Establishment media and the phony,
partisan, "human rights" groups, bringing Morel to justice is
simply a non-issue. After all, he murdered helpless Germans, so
what's the problem?
Julius Hammer, M.D:
New York abortionist and co-founder of the American communist party.
Armand Hammer:
fund-raiser and financier for Lenin and Stalin, son of Julius.
"The Communist Party was also the most Jewish party in America.
At least nineteen percent of the Young Communist League were Jews
and never less than forty percent of its leadership." (Source:
"Pakn Treger: From Yiddish Roots to the Frontiers of Jewish
Culture," Fall 1997, p. 18).
Lev Davidovich Landau:
Stalinist physicist, co-father of the Soviet atomic bomb.
Klaus Fuchs:
helped steal atomic bomb secrets for Stalin.
Ruth Werner:
colonel, Red Army GRU intelligence, assisted Fuchs.
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg:
stole American atomic bomb secrets for Stalin.
Morris Cohen (Peter Kroger):
assisted the Rosenbergs.
Markus Wolf:
chief of German Communist Stasi Secret Police.
Howard Fast:
American communist propagandist for Stalin.
David Dubinsky:
Stalin's ally, head of the U.S. International Ladies Garment
Workers Union.
Nahum Goldmann:
founder, World Jewish Congress, communist propagandist.
Rabbi Moses Rosen:
agent, Romanian communist party.
Victor Rothschild:
top British espionage agent for Stalin.
Mark Zborowski:
"...considered by historians of Soviet terror operations to have
been the most fearsome. ..(Soviet) spy of all time" (Stephen
Schwartz, Forward, Jan. 26, 1996).
Zborowski, a medical researcher, murdered a dissident with a
poisoned orange at the Soviet-run hospital in Paris. Zborowski
was implicated in several other assassinations in 1936 and 1937.
In the 1940s worked for both the American Jewish Committee and
the KGB. In the 1960s Zborowski worked as a medical researcher at
Mount Zion Hospital in San Francisco. He trained numerous
psychiatrists and medical specialists in the Bay Area. He died in
1990 (cf. "The Strange Case of Doctor Zborowski and Monsieur
Etienne" by Philippe Videlier, in Le Monde Diplomatique, Dec.
1992). 993).
From 1936-1939, when Stalin's "International Brigade" forces were
dispatched to Spain to fight the Catholics, Jewish Communists
comprised the largest faction of his troops, "More than 40,000
volunteers fought in the International Brigade... A huge number
of the volunteers were Jews: between 7,000 and 10,000 of the
internationals as a whole, more than one-third of the Americans."
Jewish Communist Milton Wolff was the last commander of the
American contingent. Rabbi Hyman Katz joined in order to fight
Spanish Christians, (cf. Jeffrey Sharlet, "Troublemakers," Pakn
Treger, Fall, 1997, pp. 16, 18 and 24).
The Communists slaughtered 6,549 Spanish priests, 283 helpless
nuns and 13 bishops.
"In Ciudad Real in the center of Spain, the bishop and every
single priest of the diocese were murdered; not one escaped."
Dr. Warren H. Carroll, 70 Years of the Communist Revolution, pp.
184-185, 188-189. (Also cf. Justo Perez de Urbel, Catholic
Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War [Kansas City, Missouri: The
Angelus Press, 1993).
Stalin's propaganda agent in Spain was New Yorker Leon Rosenthal.
On Oct. 16, 1948, 50,000 Jewish communists turned out in Moscow's
Red Square to welcome the first Israeli delegation to Moscow.
Stalin supported Zionism's 1947 Palestine partition plan, gave
crucial recognition to the newly-created state of Israel and
voted for Israel's admission to the United Nations.
In 1951 communist and Marxist parties had twenty-three seats in
the Israeli Knesset.
The kibbutz system was the most powerful movement in the country
and the most powerful kibbutz leaders were nearly all Marxists.
The biggest Israeli holiday was May Day, celebrated with rallies,
marches, red banners and red songs.
As recently as 1987 the Israelis were providing the KGB with
American intelligence secrets (cf. UPI dispatch by Richard Sale,
Dec. 13, 1987 and The City Paper [Washington, DC], Jan. 15, 1988).
Jonathan Jay Pollard was part of one such spy ring. British
traitor and Communist spy Kim Philby was assisted in obtaining
safe haven in the Soviet Union by the Israeli Mossad (cf. Sunday
Telegraph [England], April 16, 1989).
This was most appropriate since Philby's KGB handler in Moscow
was also Jewish. Romania's communist regime received favorable
trade deals from the U.S. for years due to Israeli pressure on
Congress in its behalf (N.Y. Times, Jan. 18, 1992, p. 23).
The notion that the Zionist Jewish movement was anti-communist is
a fallacy. The truth is more complex. There was a left wing and a
right wing within Zionism. The rightists, like the terrorists
Jabotinsky and Stern, took a fascist approach.
Leftist Zionists like David "I am a Bolshevik" Ben-Gurion admired
the Soviet model of Jewish power and sought to incorporate it as
the political economy of the Israeli state.
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism.
Anti-Semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the
most dangerous vestige of cannibalism... under USSR law active
anti-Semites are liable to the death penalty." (Stalin, Collected
Works, vol. 13, p. 30). The African National Congress (ANC) in
South Africa was guided by two Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, "one
of its foremost intellectuals" (London Sunday Times, Aug. 29, 1993)
and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo). Slovo was born in a shtetl
in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the
Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we
Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander.
He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist
Party in 1986. ("Joe Slovo," Jewish Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).
Slovo had been the "planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks,
including the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured
many others...
"Slovo, who had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was
awarded a Soviet medal on his 60th birthday. ..Slovo is a
dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist without morality of any
kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the human cost,
whatever the bloodshed...
"Slovo disputes little of his image as 'the Communist mastermind'
behind the ANC's armed struggle. For him the fears of South
Africa's whites are both a measure of the ANC's growing strength
and a crucial factor in hastening what he believes will be its
ultimate victory.
'Revolutionary violence has created the inspirational impact that
we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading
position,' Slovo said." ("Rebel Strategist Seeks to End
Apartheid," L.A. Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14).
When Nelson Mandela's ANC took over South Africa, Slovo was named
Minister of Housing.
Slovo, a Yiddish-speaking Lithuanian Jew, was Secretary General
of the South African Communist Party and director of the military
wing of the ANC, which perpetrated numerous terror bombings
against white civilians.
When we look at these gruesome personalities, who are only the
tip of the Jewish iceberg that was Soviet Communism and who were
responsible for the deaths of upwards of thirty million people;
when we realize how little is written or filmed about their
crimes, we begin to realize that the exclusive focus on the
crimes of the Germans, real and imagined, is a function of
propaganda.
If the facts about the Jewish Communist holocaust against the
peasants and Christians of Russia and Eastern Europe were given
massive publicity, the supposed "special evil" of the Germans
would stand exposed as a racist fraud. German actions during
World War Two must be viewed in a vacuum in order for the New
World Order to advance its covert objective of Jewish supremacy.
When Nazi actions are placed within the context of Jewish
Communism's abominable crimes against the Christian people of
Russia and Eastern Europe, the public will begin to understand
that Hitler and the Nazis were a reaction, however unbalanced and
excessive, to the Jewish Communist genocide against millions of
Christians and peasants in the East.
This is why the crucial facts about Jewish Communism must never
be documented in Hollywood films, discussed in university courses
or pictured in contemporary news magazines. This is why Malcolm
Muggeridge's book, an eyewitness account of the Jewish Communist
holocaust against Christians, Winter in Moscow, has been tightly
suppressed.
In the Sunday Telegraph (London, England: Nov. 18, 1990) the
question is asked:
"Why then has it (Winter in Moscow) never been republished? The
answer may lie in Muggeridge's handling of what was then called
the 'Jewish question.
'...Winter in Moscow is acutely concerned with Jews. ..It was of
course the case that a very disproportionate number of the early
Bolsheviks were Jews and thus of commissars and apparatchiki..."
The Campaign for Radical Truth in History's documentation of
these forbidden facts constitutes the chief motivation for the
suppression attempts of such Stalinist censorship groups as the
A.D.L. and Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both of these organizations
would, if they could, have this writer jailed for publishing the
documentation herein in Germany, France, or Austria.
They regularly supply "intelligence files" to those governments
on pro-Christian and pro-German writers.
In 1995 the ADL sought to assist the prosecution of 69 year old
American writer Hans Schmidt who was imprisoned in Germany for
publishing a newsletter in Florida.
These Jewish censors would like to have similar laws passed
worldwide, resulting in the jailing of more writers and
researchers who will not toe the party line or worship the Golden
Calf.
To give the other side of history, the revisionist side; to give
voice to the voiceless millions of dead victims of Jewish
Communism, is regarded as "hateful" by the vain Zionists who
demand for themselves the right to vomit forth a daily barrage of
sewage upon the sacred memory of our grandparents and ancestors.
To defend against the dishonoring of our heritage and our
ancestors, is surely not hate; it is the right of self-defense
against psychological warfare.
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land
confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the
Galilee of its Arab population."
-- David Ben Gurion, Prime Minister of Israel 1948-1963, 1948-05,
to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael
Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
"WASHINGTON, Nov 12th, 2010 -- (Southern Express)
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has today officially
announced plans for a new Permanent Exhibition. The existing
exhibition is to be dismantled, packed onto trucks and deposited at
the local Washington land fill.
It has been agreed by the Museum Board that the exhibition as it
stood, pales into insignificance when compared to the holocaust
currently being undertaken against Palestinian civilians by Jewish
occupational forces.
The Lidice exhibit, in which a Czechoslovakian town was destroyed
and its citizens butchered in reprisal for the assassination of
Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the Security Police and deputy chief of
the Gestapo has also been moved out to allow for the grisly
inclusion of a new exhibit to be called "Ground Zero at Jenin"
which was ruthlessly destroyed in similar fashion.
A display of German war criminal Adolf Eichmann is to be replaced
by one of Ariel Sharon detailing his atrocities, not only in
Palestinian territories, but also in the refugee camps of Sabra and
Shatila in Lebanon.
<end news update>
"Remember when the Jews levelled Jenin (Palestine's Lidiche) and
refused to let the UN investigate until they got rid of the
evidence?
Remember Rachel Corrie? Killed by Israelis when she tried to stop
them from an act of ethnic cleansing when they were destroying
Palestinian homes?
Remember the graphic footage of that Palestinian man trying to
protect his son while the Israeli's used them as target practice.
An image ever bit as damning as that young female napalm victim
in Vietnam?
Remember the wanton attack and murder of unarmed civilians on
ships in international waters?
And of course there was their 2008 killing spree in Gaza.
They arrest people without charge, they continue to steal
Palestinian land, they destroy the homes of the parents of
suicide bombers, they target people for what they euphemistically
call "terrorist assassinations", et al, ad nauseum.
In short everything the SS did against the Jews, the Israelis are
now doing against the Palestinians.
Perhaps we should leave the last word on the subject to a Jew...
Sir Gerald Kaufman who compared the actions of Israeli troops in
Gaza to the Nazis who forced his family to flee Poland.
Kaufman, a member of the Jewish Labour movement, also called for
an arms embargo against Israel.
Sir Gerald, who was brought up as an orthodox Jew and Zionist,
said: "My grandmother was ill in bed when the Nazis came to her
home town a German soldier shot her dead in her bed. "My
grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers
murdering Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza.
The present Israeli government ruthlessly and cynically exploits
the continuing guilt from gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in
the Holocaust as justification for their murder of Palestinians."
He said the claim that many of the Palestinian victims were
militants "was the reply of the Nazi" and added: "I suppose the
Jews fighting for their lives in the Warsaw ghetto could have
been dismissed as militants."
He accused the Israeli government of seeking "conquest" and
added: "They are not simply war criminals, they are fools.""
"He (Martin Luther) accused them (the Jews) of all those
fictitious crimes which had made Europe such a hell for them.
He, too, claimed that they poisoned the wells used by
Christians, assassinated their Christian patients, and murdered
Christian children to procure blood for the Passover.
"He called on the princes and rulers to persecute them
mercilessly, and commanded the preachers to set the mobs on
them. He declared that if the power were his, he would take all
the leaders of the Jews and tear their tongues out by the roots."
(Stranger than Fiction, p. 249).
"In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews
to England; This however impossible while Charles living. Charles
cannot be executed without trial on adequate grounds for which do
not presently exist.
"Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have
nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though
willing to help in his escape. [King Charles I was in prison at
the time]."
(Letter from Oliver Cromwell to Ebenezer Pratt - History Of The
Bank of England, by Frances and Manasseh Ben Israel's Mission To
Oliver Cromwell, The Jewish Intelligencers, by Lucien Wolf).
"Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed, and Jews
admitted.
"Assassination too dangerous. Charles should be given an
opportunity to escape. His recapture will then make a trial and
execution possible.
"The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until
trial commences."
(Letter from Ebenezer Pratt to Oliver Cromwell)
"Let us recall that on July 17, 1918 at Ekaterinenburg, and on
the order of the Cheka (order given by the Jew Sverdloff from
Moscow) the commission of execution commanded by the Jew
Yourowsky, assassinated by shooting or by bayoneting the Czar,
Czarina, Czarevitch, the four Grand Duchesses, Dr. Botkin, the
man-servant, the woman-servant, the cook and the dog.
"The members of the imperial family in closest succession to the
throne were assassinated in the following night. The Grand Dukes
Mikhailovitch, Constantinovitch, Vladimir Paley and the Grand
Duchess Elisabeth Feodorovna were thrown down a well at
Alapaievsk, in Siberia. The Grand Duke Michael Alexandrovitch was
assassinated at Perm with his suite.
"Dostoiewsky was not right when he said: 'An odd fancy sometimes
comes into my head: What would happen in Russia if instead of
three million Jews which are there, there were three million
Russians and eighty million Jews? What would have happened to
these Russians among the Jews and how would they have been
treated? Would they have been placed on an equal footing with
them? Would they have permitted them to pray freely? Would they
not have simply made them slaves, or even worse: would they not
have simply flayed the skin from them? Would they not have
massacred them until completely destroyed, as they did with other
peoples of antiquity in the times of their olden history?"
(Nicholas Sokoloff, L'enquete judiciaire sur l'Assassinat de la
famille imperiale. Payot, 1924; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 153-154)
PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer
(assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the
instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money
and the press, and that communism is an instrument of
international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule
the nations.
(El Estado Nacional)
"...Everywhere I found minds much inclined to exaltation. All
feel that the old world is cracking, and that kings are
finished... The harvest made should fructify... The fall of
thrones makes it no longer doubtful to me, who have come from
studying the work of our societies in France, Switzerland and
Germany, and even Prussia.
The assault which, a few years from now, or perhaps a few
months, will be delivered upon the princes of the earth, will
bury them under the ruins of their powerless armies and their
decrepit monarchies. Everywhere there is enthusiasm among our
people and apathy and indifference among the enemy (as we see
today!).
It is a certain and infallible sign of success. ..In order to
kill surely the old world we have believed it necessary to stifle
the Catholic and Christian germ...
This brave Mazzini, whom I have met at various times, has always
his humanitarian dream in his brain and in his mouth. But, apart
from his small failings and his methods of assassinations, he has
good in him. With his mysticism he strikes the attention of the
masses who understand nothing of his grand airs of prophet or his
discourses of a cosmopolitan Illuminatus..."
(Les SociCtCs Secrates de France et dltalie, 1 830, The Trail of
the Serpent, Inquire Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 94).
<!-- *********************************************************** -->
Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906-1957)
Evidence
The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the
More evidence
importantly, it leaves out Herzl's words:
"If whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it,
as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created."
Edwin Black's book is a great documentation, but it is sad that
he and the Jewish Leadership are not willing to face the facts
that the Zionist Leadership was the cause of the Holocaust.
It is even more sad to think that the Jewish people suffered
tremendously during the Nazi regime caused by their own
leadership. They were sacrificed for the cause of establishing
a "kingdom" on earth, which has no place for the God of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Matthew 23:13-15).
Some day in the future the Jewish people will understand that
their Messiah, which their ancestors rejected, was the Son of God.
(Zechariah 12:10-14)
In 1964 a book by Dietrich Bronder (German Jew) was published
in Germany called, "Before Hitler came." The book tried to come
to grips with why the German Jews turned on their own people
and caused so much destruction of innocent people.
The answer given in the book states that the driving force behind
the Jewish Nazis, was the old dream to have a Messiah who could
establish a world rule with the Jews in power. The same
ideology as can be seen in John 6:14-15.
Intelligence Briefs - ZioNazi Assassinations
Israel's confirmation that it is deploying secret undercover squads
on the West Bank and Gaza was careful to hide that those squads will
be equipped with weapons that contravene all international treaties.
The full range of weapons available to the undercover teams include
a number of nerve agents, choking agents, blood agents and blister
agents.
All these are designed to bring about quick deaths. Also available
to the undercover teams are other killer gases that are also strictly
outlawed under international treaties.
The news that Barak's government is now prepared to break all
international laws to cling to power has disturbed some of the
more moderate members of Israel's intelligence community.
One of them confirmed to me that Barak's military intelligence
chiefs have drawn up a list of "no fewer than 400 Palestinians
who are targeted for assassination by these means".
The 14 Characteristics of Fascism by Lawrence Britt
#2 Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights.
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people
in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored
in certain cases because of "need."
The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture,
summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of
prisoners,
etc.
#12 Obsession with Crime and Punishment.
Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless
power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook
police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of
patriotism.
There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited
power in fascist nations.
Imagine the leader of a foreign terrorist organization coming to
the United States with the intention of raising funds for his
group. His organization has committed terrorist acts such as
bombings, assassinations, ethnic cleansing and massacres.
Now imagine that instead of being prohibited from entering the
country, he is given a heroes' welcome by his supporters, despite
the fact some noisy protesters try to spoil the fun.
Arafat, 1974? - No.
It was Menachem Begin in 1948.
"Without Deir Yassin, there would be no state of Israel."
Begin and Shamir proved that terrorism works. Israel honors its
founding terrorists on its postage stamps,
like 1978's stamp honoring Abraham Stern [Scott #692], and 1991's
stamps honoring Lehi (also called "The Stern Gang") and Etzel (also
called "The Irgun") [Scott #1099, 1100].
Being a leader of a terrorist organization did not prevent either
Begin or Shamir from becoming Israel's Prime Minister. It looks
like terrorism worked just fine for those two.
Oh, wait, you did not condemn terrorism, you merely stated that
Palestinian terrorism will get them nowhere. Zionist terrorism is
OK, but not Palestinian terrorism? You cannot have it both ways.
Assassinations of key witnesses about Protocols of Learned Elders of Zion
Note: see full quote in the Protocols of Learned Elders of Zion section.
The former circulated it privately in 1897; the second Professor
Sergius Nilus, published it in 1901.
This information is mostly drawn from L. Fry's work: "Waters
Flowing Eastward." It is corroborated by a statement made by
Philip Stepanov, Chamberlain, Privy Councillor and former
Procurator of the Holy Synod at Moscow; it is witnessed by Prince
DIMITRI GALITZlN.
This evidential document, delivered on April 1 7th 1927, has been
photographically reproduced, and the writer of these pages owns a
copy of it.
Stepanov states he received the M. S. of the Protocols in 1895
from Major Sukhotin. He had them printed privately and gave a
copy to A. T. KELEPOVSKY, chief of Grand Duke Sergius' household.
After reading them, the Grand Duke sighed and murmured; "TOO
LATE!" He was assassinated shortly afterward.
"The epithet "anti-Semitism" is hurled to silence anyone, even
other Jews, brave enough to decry Israel's systematic, decades-long
pogrom against the Palestinian Arabs.
Because of the Holocaust, "anti-Semitism" is such a powerful
instrument of emotional blackmail that it effectively pre-empts
rational discussion of Israel and its conduct.
It is for this reason that many good people can witness daily
evidence of Israeli inhumanity toward the "Palestinians' collective
punishment," destruction of olive groves, routine harassment,
judicial prejudice, denial of medical services, assassinations,
torture, apartheid-based segregation, etc. -- yet not denounce it
for fear of being branded "anti-Semitic."
To be free to acknowledge Zionism's racist nature, therefore, one
must debunk the calumny of "anti-Semitism."
Once this is done, not only will the criminality of Israel be
undeniable, but Israel, itself, will be shown to be the embodiment
of the very anti-Semitism it purports to condemn."
-- Greg Felton, Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism
--------------------------------------
>> Just look at FEMA issue.
>> That is EXACTLY the same thing as Baby Yar,
>
>No, it is not.
>FEMA was (is?) badly managed, not evil.
How do you know that?
Are you their boss?
>> And at least 3 million coffins are already waiting for you.
>They can wait, I am not in any hurry.
>> About the ONLY thing that is left is for Obama
>> to grab a mike and declare the Martial Law.
>US citizens have more rifles than the US army.
>Remember Boris Yeltsin on the steps of the Russian
>Parliament breaking a military coup. There are plenty
>of Americans who can do better than that drunk.
>> And the Russian Bear is waking up finally.
>....giving China a nice clear shot.
Peter Webb
"redux" <re...@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:igevs6$bs0$2...@tornado.tornevall.net...
I can only recall having met two Jews; one is an IT Consultant ands the
other is my dentist.
Neither of them seem like communists to me.
Are you sure this is true?
redux
100%
Stay in tough...
redux
----
"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every
Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and
by every single Jew in the world.
There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight
is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material
war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to
become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost
territories as well as her colonies. but our Jewish interests
call for the complete destruction of Germany..."
(Vladimir Jabotinsky, Mascha Rjetsch, January 1934)
"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France,
North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine,
are determined to bring the war of annihilation against
Germany to its final end."
(The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in
Nederland, September 13, 1939)
"His (God's) intention will be realized through bloody struggles,
wars and revolutions; the present social order will be destroyed
together with all institutions that are bound up with the present
social order. State capitalism and fascism will take the place of
the present social order."
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 225).
"The responsibility for the last World War [WW I] rests solely
upon the shoulders of the international financiers.
It is upon them that rests the blood of millions of dead
and millions of dying."
(Congressional Record, 67th Congress, 4th Session,
Senate Document No. 346)
"I probably had more power during the war than any other man
in the war; doubtless that is true."
(The International Jew, Commissioned by Henry Ford,
speaking of the Jew Benard Baruch,
a quasiofficial dictator during WW I).
"In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war
[WW II], and I defy the powers of darkness which they represent.
I am proud to die for my ideals, and I am sorry for the sons of
Britain who have died without knowing why."
(William Joyce's [Lord Ha Ha] last words just before Britain
executed him for anti war activism in WW II).
"All Jews world wide - declared war on the Third Reich."
(The London Daily Express, Front Page Story, 3/24/1933).
"Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened
there during the 30 year War."
(Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy, p. 11).
"Judea declares War on Germany."
(Daily Express, March 24, 1934)
"Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on
it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on
Christianity."
(The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London,
Count Mensdorf, 1918).
"In [preWW II] Berlin, for example, when the Nazis
came to power, 50.2% of the lawyers were Jews...
48% of the doctors were Jews.
The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin
newspapers, and made great inroads on the educational system."
(The House That Hitler Built, by Stephen Roberts, 1937).
"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the
aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the
Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague,
condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror.
I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want
war. But we, {England}, declared war on Germany, intent on
destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance
of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans' {Jews}
around Roosevelt.
We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war.
Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He
offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945,
we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire.
I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we
accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only
under a different label."
(Ashamed and Humiliated The British Attorney General, Sir
Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March
16/84 (AP)).
"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot
clearly say why... Not so many years ago I used to hear that we
were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the
complaint is being whispered around that no art and no
profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
"We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are
pacifists by nature and tradition, and WE ARE THE ARCH-PLOTTERS
OF UNIVERSAL WARS AND THE CHIEF BENEFICIARIES OF THOSE WARS. We
are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism
and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.
Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...
"You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose
we admit the charge. What of it?... You make much noise and fury
about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie
palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But
WHAT IS THAT COMPARED TO OUR STAGGERING INFLUENCE IN YOUR
CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, YOUR LAWS AND YOUR GOVERNMENT, AND THE VERY
THOUGHTS YOU THINK EVERY DAY?
..'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we
plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that
book. All right... we will underwrite every word of it. It
is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the
unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried
out, which we never have denied because you never had the
courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record
is extant for anybody to read?
"If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots,
may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about?
What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your
public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and
movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of
the proved control of your whole civilization...
"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our
guilt. WE ARE INTRUDERS. WEARE SUBVERTERS. We have taken your
natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc
with them.
"WE {Jews} HAVE BEEN AT THE BOTTOM OF NOT MERELY OF
THE LATEST WAR {WWI} BUT OF NEARLY ALL YOUR WARS, NOT ONLY OF
THE RUSSIAN BUT OF EVERY OTHER MAJOR REVOLUTION IN YOUR
HISTORY.
"We have brought discord and confusion and frustration
into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. No
one can tell how long we shall go on doing it... Who knows what
great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left
you alone.
"But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and
pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had
reared, and changed the whole course of your history. WE
CONQUERED YOU as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or
Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our
spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
"Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the
French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph
of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice?
And the end is still a long way off. WE STILL DOMINATE YOU...
"Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your
progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield
Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity}
which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps
you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit
either to reject or to accept in full...
"We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses,
paralyzed your desires...
"So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place
we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us.
But we should make no bones about telling you why... You
Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your
civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a
compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests,
aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you
declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly
development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see
the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and
it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and
professed creed of the governing clique is. THE INFLUENCE, on
the other hand, IS certainly THERE, and IT IS VASTLY GREATER
AND MORE INSIDIOUS THAN YOU APPEAR TO REALIZE...
"That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates
us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You
go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this
and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. WE ARE
CONSCIOUS OF THE INJURY WE DID WHEN WE IMPOSED UPON YOU OUR
ALIEN FAITH AND TRADITIONS. And then you specify and talk
vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture
promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles,
we see with relief, WILL NEVER KNOW THE REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR
CRIMES...
"You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. IT
IS THE TRUTH, and I cower at your discovery... We undoubtedly
had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and IT IS
simply A FACT THAT WE WERE THE PRIME MOVERS IN THE BOURGEOIS
DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTIONS OF THE CENTURY BEFORE LAST, BOTH IN
FRANCE AND AMERICA. If we were not, we did not know our own
interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed
us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They
benefited us... You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and
cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can
you wonder that we Jews have always taken your
anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to
violence?"
(Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God),
member of the staff of the New York Tribune,
"A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine,
January-February, 1928).
"When you go to war, do not go as the first, so that you may return
as the first. Five things has Kannan recommended to his sons:
"Love each other; love the robbery; hate your masters; and never tell
the truth"
-- (Pesachim F. 113-B)
"It has been estimated that of the world Jew population of
approximately fifteen millions, no fewer than five million
are in the United States. Twenty-five percent of the
inhabitants of New York are Jews.
During the Great War we bought off this huge American Jewish
public by the promise of the Jewish National Home in
Palestine, held by Ludendorff to be the master stroke of
Allied propaganda as it enabled us not only to appeal to
Jews in America but to Jews in Germany as well."
(Propaganda in the Next War, Sidney Robertson, p. 147; War!
War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 192).
"Meanwhile our Christian? Government unites with the
British-Jewish Empire, in a plot to starve not merely German
women and children (that has had our active support since
the war started), but also the women and children of France,
Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Austria,
Hungary, Italy; in fact, all of Europe except Britain until,
by provoked revolution, it is hoped general chaos will come.
Germany will be destroyed, and the British- Jewish Empire
once more put in control of Europe.
The starvation of men, women and children has been the most
approved English method of warfare since the Jews became
dominant there - Ireland, China, India, the Boers, Germany,
Austria, Hungary, Italy and now France, Holland, Belgium,
Norway and Spain. England and the Jews, with our help, in
the name of civilization and Christianity, have illegally
made food contraband against friendly peaceable nations and
call it economic warfare - viz: Jewish warfare - the Four
Horsemen."
(War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, p. 242).
"Under the pressure of international finance the atmosphere
in Europe became very congested. Instead of using the huge
money resources for cultural purposes, the international
banking houses urged unlimited armaments of European
States, and sometime deliberately precipitated military
adventures.
In this connection it is of interest to recall a statement
of Israel Zangwill, the well-known Zionist leader, to the
effect that it was Mr. Jacob Schiff who financed 'the
Japanese War against Russia,'
(See Israel Zangwill's "The Problems of the Jewish Race,"
p. 14, The Judaic Publishing Company, New York),
as well as another statement, that of Mr. George Kennan,
revealing the fact that it was the same banker who financed
the revolution among Russian war prisoners in Japan
(Compare the report on a Socialist meeting held in Carnegie
Hall on March 23, 1917, to celebrate the Russian
Revolution, as recorded in the New York Times, March 24,
1917).
Immense munition plants, such as Krupp and Szkoda,
Poutiloff, and Manfred Weiss, Deutsch & Son, and Schneider,
were all controlled directly or indirectly by high finance,
forming part of the interlocking system.
Nor should it be forgotten that the same group of
cosmopolitan bankers invariably have given their support to
varioius enterprises which helped the Central Powers to
further their imperialistic plans.
Thus, soon after the annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
when the Dual Monarchy began her war preparations against
Italy, it was this bankers' group which loaned 300 million
kronen for the expansion of the Austrian navy, with the
result that the new battleships were christened by one part
of the European press as "Rothschild dreadnaughts."
(The World at the Cross Roads, Boris Brasol, pp. 11- 12).
"Only now, after the terrible events. ..it has become
possible to appreciate fully the accuracy of the information
presented in the secret report of Count Lamsdorf, former
Russian Foreign Minister, to Emperor Nicholas II, dated
January 3, 1906, on the international aspect of the first
revolutionary outbreak in Russia in 1905.
Some of the passages in this report are so striking that we
feel it necessary to quote them in extenso: 'The events
which took place in Russia during 1905, and which assumed
especially acute forms at the beginning of October last,
when after a series of strikes, they brought about an armed
revolt in Moscow, and many other towns and localities of the
Empire, plainly indicate that the Russian revolutionary
movement; apart from its deeper, internal, social-economic
and political causes, has also quite a definite
international character...
The most decisive indications which warrant this conclusion
are given by the circumstances that the Russian
revolutionaries are in possession of great quantities of
arms which are imported from abroad, and of very
considerable financial means, because there can be no doubt
that the leaders of the revolution have already spent on our
anti-government movement, the organization of all sorts of
strikes included, large amounts of money.
Since, however, it must be acknowledged that such support
given to the revolutionary movement by sending arms and
money from abroak can hardly be ascribed to foreign
governments (with very special exceptions, as, for instance,
that of Sweden supporting the revolutionary movement in
Finland, and of Austria which helped the Poles) one is bound
to come to the conclusion that there are foreign
capitalists' organizations which are interested in
supporting our revultionary movement.
With this conclusion the fact must be confronted that the
Russian revolutionary movement has the outspoken character
of a movement of the heterogeneous nationalities of Russia
which one after another, Armenians and Georgians, Letts and
Esths, Finns, Poles and others, arose agaisnt the Imperial
Government...
If we add to the above, that, as has been proved beyond any
doubt,
a very coniserable part among these hererogeneous
nationalities is played by Jews, who, individually, as
ringleaders in the other organizations, as well as through
their own (the Jewish Bund in the Western Provinces), have
always come forward as the most bellicose element of the
revolution, we may feel entitled to assume that the
above-mentioned foreign support of the Russian revolutionary
movement comes from Jewish capitalist circles.
In this respect one must not ignore the following concurrences
of facts which lead to further conclusions, namely, that the
revolutionary movement is not only supported but also to a
certain degree directed from abroad.
On one hand, the strike borke out with special violence and
spread all over Russia not before and not after October,
that is, just at the time when our government tried to
realize a considerable foreign loan without the
participation of the Rothschilds and just in time for
preventing the carrying out of this financial operation;
the panic provoked among the buyers and holders of Russian
loans could not fail to give additional advantages to the
Jewish bankes and capitalists who openly and knowingly
speculated upon the fall of the Russian rates.
.Moeover, certain very significant facts, which were also
mentioned in the press, quite confirm the obvious connection
of the Russian revolutionary movement with the foreign
Jewish organizations.
Thus, for instance, the above-mentioned importation of arms,
which according to our agents' information was carried on
from the European Continent through England can be duly
appreciated if we take into consideratikon that already in
June, 1905, a special Antlo-Jewish committee of capitalists
was openly established in England for the purpose of
collecitn money for arming fighting groups of Russian Jews,
and that the well-known anti-Russian publicist, Lucien Wolf,
was the leading member of this committee.
On the other hand, in view of the fact that the sad
consequences of the revolutionary propaganda affected the
Jews themselves, another committee of Jewish capitalists was
formed in England, under the ldeadership of Lord Rothschild,
which collected considrable amounts of contributions in
England, France and Germany for the officially alleged
purpose of helping Russian Jews who suffered from pogroms.
And lastly, the Jews in America, without thinking it
necessary formally to distinguish between the two purposes,
collect money for helping the pogrom sufferers and for
arming the Jewish youth.'"
(The World At The Cross Roads, Boris Brasol, pp. 73-76).
On the fifteenth day of March, 1917, Emperor Nicholas II
abdicated from the Russian throne for himself and for his
son. Six days later the following Army Order No. 371 was
issued by General Alexeev, Chief of Staff of General
Headquarters:
'Emperor Nicholas II, who abdicated the throne, before his
departue from the region occupied by the army in the field,
addressed the troops with the following farewell words: For
the last time I apply to you, much beloved armies. After
abdicating for myself and my son from the Russian throne,
the ower was transferred to the Provisional Government which
was established on the initiative of the Imperial Duma. Let
the Lord help it to lead Russia in the path of glory and
prosperity. Let the Lord help you, gallant troops, to
protect our fatherrland against a wicked foe.
For two and one-half years continuously you rendered hard
battle service. Much blood was shed. Many efforts have been
made and the hour is close when Russia, tied to her gallant
Allies, by means of one combined effort towards victory,
shall break the last resistance of the enemy.
This unprecedented war must be pursued to a final victory.
He who at present thinks about peace, he who strives for it,
is a betrayer of his country; a traitor. I am confident that
every honest soldier is of this belief.
Therefore, perform your duty, bravely protect our great
country, obey the Provisional Government, obey your
superiors, and remember that every weakening in military
discipline is to the advantage of the enemy. I am firmly
convinced that you boundless love for our great country is
not extinguished.
May the Lord bless you, and may St. George, the martyr and
the victor, lead you to final victory. Nicholas.'"
(The World At The Cross Roads, Boris Brasol, pp. 88-89).
"The Revolution is on. We received today the only cheering
news within the last three years of the bloody World War.
The hearts of every working man and woman burst with joy and
gladness at this news.
Nicholas is overthrown. The Duman has taken the Government
in its hands and the liberal government rules. Hurrah!"
(The Forward, a Jewish daily paper published in Hew York City).
"He considered the Revolution a victroy for the Jews, which
opinion, he said, prevailed on the East Side where rejoicing
knew no bounds. We felt, added Mr. Cahan, that this is a
great triumph for the Jews' cause.
The anti-Jewish element in Russia has always been identified
with the anti-revolutionary party. Jews having always sat
high in the Councils of the revolutionists, all of our race
became inseparably linked with the opponents of the
government in the official mind."
(New York Call, March 17, 1917, Upheaval in Russia Is Fight
for Liberty, Abraham Cahan).
"...It was in England, the home of the Jews, says Mr.
Pitt-Rivers, that the Tsar's Government was always
systematically vilified, for years made out as the blackest
home of tyranny and oppression in the world, although there
were English writers like Mr. Stephen Graham who, years ago,
went out to Russia to live there because he considered it
the freest country in Europe.
It was, of course, the least commercialized, while England,
one of the most commerciaized countries; and the greatest
loverrs and entertainers of Jews, in the world, in
consequence, sees no merit in a simple agricultural existence.
Neither is it surprising in view of her cult of unlimited
industrialism, and its consequences; an ever expanding
industrial and urban population, free commercial
exploitation by all and sundry middlemen, usurers, Jews;
and the translations of all values into money-values, by
which alone can be realized that ideal of personal equality,
dad-levelness and compulsory mediocrity in which she glories
under the name of Liberalism and Democracy.
Can England with her tradition of three hundred years of
Jeww-loving free-mammonism, democratic-shopkeeping,
Puritanism, and obsessional urban-industrial expansion, in
any case understand the healthier ideal of rural simplicity
and paternal government, which, in spite of the obvious
shortcomings of his successor, was the ideal of Alexander
III."
(George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian
Revolution, with preface by Dr. Oscar Levy, pp. 20-21, Basil
Blackwell, Oxford, 1920).
"Wrangel pretended to combat the Bolsheviks, Bolshevism is
Jewry. In order to retain the favor of the Jews holding the
real power in England, France and the United States, Wrangel
showed to the Jews signs of his submission to them.
Thereafter the Russian masses abandoned Wrangel as a traitor
or as a comedian. It is impossible simultaneously to be an
auxiliary of the Jew and an enemy of the Bolsheviki who are
Jews.
Be it incoherence or treason, Wrangel deserved the same fate
as Denikin and he got it."
(La Vieille-Fraonce, No. 200, December 2, 1920, article
entitled The Enigma of Wrangel Explained; The World At The
Cross Roads, Boris Brasol, p. 342).
redux
---------------------
"We will have a world government whether you like it
or not. The only question is whether that government will be
achieved by conquest or consent."
(Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950,
as he testified before the U.S. Senate).
"National Governments must go in the interest of World
Government, World Police and World Currency."
(Lord Cecil, At a formal luncheon given in his honor at the
Hotel Astor, New York City, November 19, 1937).
"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for
it in blood as well as in words and money."
(Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)).
"In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will
build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of
all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of
Mankind."
-- Look Magazine. (1962). January 16.
"At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here
in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin
American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai
Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations
in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the
struggle to establish not only an American system of political
and economic security but a new world order."
(Part of article in the New York Times (November 1975))
"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for
universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order."
(Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December
1988))
"We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order
coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms."
(Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post
(May 1991)).
"We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East
to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and
stop aggression.
This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's
vision for peace for the post-war period."
(Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)).
"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and
stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the
peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see,
this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long."
(President George Bush (January 1991)).
"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the
New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and
interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and
permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N.
Security Council."
(Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January
1991)).
"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the
following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf,
press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new
world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law
with a stronger U.N. and World Court."
(George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991)).
"... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with
Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the
phrase earlier." (William Safire, in the New York Times (February
1991)).
"The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today,
for the real menace of our republic is this INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT
WHICH LIKE A GIANT OCTOPUS SPRAWLS ITS SLIMY LENGTH OVER CITY,
STATE AND NATION.
Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a
self-created screen. It seizes in its long and powerful tenatacles
our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools,
our courts, our newspapers, and every agency creted for the
public protection.
It squirms in the jaws of darkness and thus is the better able
to clutch the reins of government, secure enactment of the
legislation favorable to corrupt business, violate the law with
impunity, smother the press and reach into the courts.
To depart from mere generaliztions, let say that at the head of
this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a
small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as
the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful
international bankers virtually run the United States
Government for their own selfish pusposes.
They practically control both parties, write political platforms,
make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private
organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination
for high public office only such candidates as well be amenable to
the dictates of corrupt big business.
They connive at centralization of government on the theory that a
small group of hand-picked, privately controlled individuals in
power can be more easily handled than a larger group among whom
there will most likely be men sincerely interested in public welfare.
These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests
control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country.
They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or
drive out of office public officials who refust to do the
bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the
invisible government."
(Former New York City Mayor John Haylan speaking in Chicago and
quoted in the March 27 New York Times)
"Those who stand too close to the canvas of history while it is
being woven will error in their estimate of forces. Minor
setbacks will take on the aspects of decisive defeats, minor
advances the aspects of major victories. Only in the perspective
of all our history - the longest perspective of which any people
can boast - shall we be able to estimate the significance of
recent events.
"Today the hearts of the Jews are oppressed by the bitter events
in Germany; let them, while they extend help to the victims of a
cruel regime, recall that governments and rulers change, the
Jewish people remains.
"In other lands than Germany there smolders still a dangerous
threat against Jewish life. Let the Jews be prepared...
"Let their fears be tempered by an understanding of their long
past, and their hopes be rendered sober by an appreciation of the
long future before them.
"Let them measure all tasks, all difficulties, and all prospects
by the standard of a world-wide outlook."
(The Visionary on the Mountain Top).
These quotations, and many others like them, demonstrate clearly
that this words "new world order" have been in use for decades,
and did not originate with President George Bush in 1990.
The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states.
The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty
and independence of nation-states and some form of world
government.
This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S.
Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them.
Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of
the United Nations and its agencies to a world government,
complete with a world army, a world parliament, a World Court,
global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every
aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care,
population, immigration, communications, transportation,
commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.).
The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details
and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.
Ceasing The Power
-----------------
"Ambassador Henry Morgenthau declared 'America is our Zion.'"
(America Our Zion, Says Morgenthau Assailing Zionism, The World,
June, 27, 1921, p. 22).
"We know the powers that are defying the people... Our Government
is in the hands of pirates. All the power of politics, and of
Congress, and of the administration is under the control of the
moneyed interests...
The adversary has the force of capital, thousands of millions of
which are in his hand...
He will grasp the knife of law, which he has so often wielded in his
interest.
He will lay hold of his forces in the legislature.
He will make use of his forces in the press, which are always
waiting for the wink, which is as good as a nod to a blind horse...
Political rings are managed by skillful and unscrupulous political
gamblers, who possess the 'machine' by which the populace are at
once controlled and crushed."
(John Swinton, Former Chief of The New York Times, in his book
"A Momentous Question: The Respective Attitudes of Labor and
Capital)
"He speaks of the War throughout as a German, and gives the
impression that Germany ought to have won, and it would have
pleased him. He speaks at length of the violation of
Belgium, but says not a word of condemnation. He explains
the Bolshevist system; he apparently approves of it, as he
gives as his own opinion that only the workers ought to have
rights, capital is wrong and ought to disappear; means of a
living must not depend on work, etc. When you buy a coat,
with your money you are buying men's work, and he condemns
it! Money should be allowed to buy only goods. (He does not
explain the contradictions).
A work of art is, say, in Rome; a 'bourgeois' (capitalist)
can go there to see it; his money will command the work of
many railway men, etc. ..to enable him to enjoy the sight of
that work or art. Why should a poor worker, to whom it
belongs as well as to the bourgeois, not see it? The works
of art should be brought to the workers everywhere. Money
left with compound interest in a bank will double itself in
fourteen years, and yet the capitalist will have remained
idle. Money is the power of commandeering other men's work!
There are in England occult societies which inspire English
politics. They know the course of evolution for the next few
decades, and are using their knowledge for the material
advantage of England. The English will try and keep the
people east of the Rhine (Middle Europe and Russia) in a
weak state by keeping up socialistic institutions among
them, in order to exploit their work as slaves, for the
benefit of the British Empire as Masters.
It is the English occultists who have caused the Tzar to be
overthrown and Bolshevism to gain power. They are making
socialistic experiments at the expense of Russia and Middle
Europe. But as the English-speaking people (England and
America) will only be able to evolve materialistic occultism
which ultimately would destroy their evolution, they will
make use for their advantage of the other kinds of occultism
which their victims will evolve, the hygienic occultism of
the German and the eugenic occultism of the Russian and the
Asiatics.
The English occultists are already in possession of
knowledge which will soon enable employers to work their
machines by some force which will do away with most workmen.
The masses of idle workmen will revolt in anger, but the
English occultists know of the means which will subdue them.
(Steiner does not explain the means!).
The cause of the present unrest in Europe is the kind of
stuff a 'lazy' clergy has been preaching in the churches for
a long time, because its preaching has no connection with
men and lives.
Steiner explains at length what the Bolshies want and what
they have done. While he never misses a chance of insulting
the churches he is very polite about the Bolshies and is
careful even to say that he is not criticizing them. When
explaining what they have done with their opponents he does
not use the word 'murder' or even 'execution'; he says they
have 'chased them away' or got rid of them.
About British politics he says they are very powerful, and
will succeed in ruling the world because they are
essentially selfish; he says that selfishness must not be
criticized, as it is part of the evolution, the development
of self-consciousness.
The French are finished, because their qualities of logic,
intellect, reason, etc., are merely the perfecting of the
Roman civilization. The only nation in the world that knows
right from wrong is the German Nation (1918)! Steiner is
apparently so anxious to show that he means what he says,
that he adds: 'The other nations do not understand anything
about it at all' German politics are always idealistic!
The telephone, wireless, express trains, and other modern
conveniences have been placed at our service at the cost of
misery to millions of workers. It was very easy for the
early English Theosophists in the second half of the
nineteenth century to take kindly to the new teaching in
their comfortable rooms well-heated with coal extracted in
the terrible conditions to which they never gave a thought.
Humanity as a collective whole is on the verge of going over
the threshold more or less consciously, and this momentous
step will be done by the proletariat. If proletariat
thinking is still chaotic and wrong, it is because it is
still imitating bourgeois mentality.
As far back as 1880 the Anglo-American occult leaders,
directing the political leaders, knew about the coming World
War and prepared for it. The German leaders knew nothing,
and would not take warning, that is why they lost! The
physical war was easily won by England, but it will be
followed by a spiritual war between East and West (East -
India, Russia, and German; West - Anglo- America), which
will be much more dangerous for the West. For instance,
India, which is half starving (according to Mrs. Besant!),
will rebel and be helped by powerful spiritual forces our of
her past. Germany must fulfil her mission, otherwise the
European civilization will be ruined."
(Rudolph Steiner, lecture given at Stuttgart in 1918;
Light-Bearers of Darkness, by Inquire Within, pp. 78-79).
"German Jewry, which found its temporary end during
the Nazi period, was one of the most interesting and for modern
Jewish history most influential centers of European Jewry.
During the era of emancipation, i.e. in the second half of the
nineteenth and in the early twentieth century, it had
experienced a meteoric rise... It had fully participated in the
rapid industrial rise of Imperial Germany, made a substantial
contribution to it and acquired a renowned position in German
economic life. Seen from the economic point of view, no Jewish
minority in any other country, not even that in America could
possibly compete with the German Jews. They were involved in
large scale banking, a situation unparalled elsewhere, and, by
way of high finance, they had also penetrated German industry.
A considerable portion of the wholesale trade was Jewish.
They controlled even such branches of industry which is
generally not in Jewish hands. Examples are shipping or the
electrical industry, and names such as Ballin and Rathenau do
confirm this statement.
I hardly know of any other branch of emancipated Jewry in
Europe or the American continent that was as deeply rooted in
the general economy as was German Jewry. American Jews of today
are absolutely as well as relative richer than the German Jews
were at the time, it is true, but even in America with its
unlimited possibilities the Jews have not succeeded in
penetrating into the central spheres of industry (steel, iron,
heavy industry, shipping), as was the case in Germany.
Their position in the intellectual life of the country was
equally unique. In literature, they were represented by
illustrious names. The theater was largely in their hands. The
daily press, above all its internationally influential sector,
was essentially owned by Jews or controlled by them. As
paradoxical as this may sound today, after the Hitler era, I
have no hesitation to say that hardly any section of the Jewish
people has made such extensive use of the emancipation offered
to them in the nineteenth century as the German Jews! In short,
the history of the Jews in Germany from 1870 to 1933 is
probably the most glorious rise that has ever been achieved by
any branch of the Jewish people (p. 116).
The majority of the German Jews were never fully assimilated
and were much more Jewish than the Jews in other West European
countries (p. 120)
Q: Does the Federal Reserve Board control the daily price and
quantity of money?
A: The Federal Reserve Board of Governors, meeting in private as
the Federal Open Market Committee with presidents of the Federal
Reserve Banks, controls all economic activity throughout the
United States by issuing orders to buy government bonds on the
open market, creating money out of nothing and causing
inflationary pressure, or, conversely, by selling government
bonds on the open market and extinguishing debt, creating
deflationary pressure and causing the stock market to drop.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
redux
---------
"We belong to the One mastering God: you belong to the republic
of playful gods."
(Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, p. 36).
Racism
------
Haim Cohan, a former judge of the Supreme Court of Israel:
"... The bitter irony is that the same biological and racist
laws that are preached by the Nazis and led to the Nuremberg
trials, formed the basis of the doctrine of Judaism in the State
of Israel."
"We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look
forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its
triumph over them."
-- (Goldwin Smith - Oxford University Modern History Professor -
October 1981)
The Jew, the Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky:
"If the Jews are the people, it is very despicable people."
"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet.
We are as different from the inferior races as they are from
insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts
and animals, cattle at best.
Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to
rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled
by our leader with a rod of iron.
The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
-- (Menachem Begin - Israeli Prime Minister 1977-1983)
"Not only was Karl Marx from a long line of Talmudic scholars,
he also hated Russians with a passion that could be described as
pathological. I looked up Karl Marx in the Jewish encyclopedias,
and I found to my amazement that the man who taught him many of
the principles of Communism was Moses Hess. As incredible as it
might seem, contemporary Zionist leaders venerate Moses Hess as
the 'forerunner' of modern Zionism.
"In The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel, under the entry for
Moses Hess, is found the following:
'Pioneer of modern socialism, social philosopher, and forerunner
of Zionism... Hess was thus a forerunner of political and
cultural Zionism and of socialist Zionism in particular. He
became deeply involved in the rising socialist movement.
'Karl Marx and Frederick Engels acknowledged that they had
learned much from him during the formative years of the
movement...
-- The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel1
as quoted by David Duke,
http://www.davidduke.
com/general/my-awakening-chapter-15-the-jewish-question-2_135.html
"The customs of the Jews are base and abominable and owe their
persistence to their depravity. Jews are extremely loyal to one
another, always ready to show compassion, but towards every
other people they feel only hate and enimity.
As a race (the Jews are not a race, because they have mingled
with the other races to the point that they are only a people,
not a race), they are prone to lust; among themselves nothing is
unlawful."
(Roman Historian Tacitus).
***********************************************************
Fascism
-------
"...the bitter irony of fate which has led the same biological
and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the
infamous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition
of Judaism within the State of Israel.
-- Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws of the State of Israel. New
York. p.156.
"Who are we gentiles to argue.
-- Ariel Sharon
It's rather telling that the Jewish people elected Ariel Sharon
as Prime Minister after his OWN government had earlier found him
complicit in the massacre of thousands of Palestinians in the
Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps.
Sums up how Israeli Jews really feel, I would have thought. And
they stand condemned for it."
As famed violinist Lord Yehudi Menuhin told the French newspaper
Le Figaro in January 1988:
"It is extraordinary how nothing ever dies completely. Even the
evil which prevailed yesterday in Nazi Germany is gaining ground
in that country [Israel] today."
For it to have any moral authority, the UN must equate Zionism
with racism. If it doesn't, it tacitly condones Israel's war of
extermination against the Palestinians."
-- Greg Felton, Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism
"America: Submerged in a Sea of Zionism. Will history remember
America merely as a major captive nation of Zionist world
conquest, ignoring the lustrous ascendance and near triumph of
the glorious potential of free man?
Will Zionist scorched-earth shots to the heart of all that is
wholesome buy them their long-sought victory for Babylonian
humanism with its showy irreverence and the glorification of all
that is sordid? Will all of the goodness, wholesomeness and
productivity of our unique Christian Republic, which millions
forfeited their lives to give us, be purged from the world,
leaving man to enter the 21st century enslaved to the least of
God's creations?
Must Americans forever witness Zionist self-promotion and
self-portrayal as our best and brightest, as our most deserving
and selfless citizens suffering a society of lesser humans with
intellectually inferior pursuits? Will God allow animal cunning,
arrogance, greed and self-aggrandizement a final victory over
humanity?
With 'political correctness' based upon Zionist fascism in the
ascendance, with the American media system largely a Zionist
tool, with Foundations and Zionist Political Action Committees
spreading legislative dollars and providing selected candidates
massive financial support, with two parties and political
commentary dominated by the Zionist International, can
traditional Americans hope to reverse the current course of
history? Can we develop a formula to reclaim our Republic and
the tools of a productive society, recapturing or rebuilding the
essence of a nation one deservedly the noble and gracious leader
of the world's nations?
Can we collectively observe that our governmental processes are
captive to Zionist appointees at every level, that our State,
Treasury and Commerce Departments as well as the Presidency are
operated by Zionists who take their order from Zionism? Can we
perceive that almost all of the national information-flow
reaches us only through a Zionist filter and pro-Israel/Zionist
propaganda machine?
Have we not discovered the demise of education, the growth and
development of crime, the decay of our cities and our rapid
decline as a united people have happened concurrent with the
intrusion of Zionists and Zionism into the American system?
Have we not noticed that today it is increasingly difficult for
ordinary people, Jew or Christian, White, Black, Yellow or
Brown, to live together in 'live and let live' affection and
respect, as the ADL the ACLU and the AIPAC attack society's
pillars, move to destroy the Christian history of America and
indoctrinate our children with ideas and philosophies that most
of the world holds to be reprehensible, society-destructive, and
beyond civility?
Have we not noticed the fear in our church bodies, the
manipulation of them to amend and mutate the teaching of Jesus'
word to men?
Here we have history's master victimizers, representing
themselves as the victims, as betrayed and sinned against,
demeaned and tormented because of society's jealousy; a colony
of Culicidae (insects such as mosquitoes and gnats) decrying the
occasional angry slap by those that have been stung. We observe
the creators of much of man's sordid and duplicitous record
artfully and deceitfully altering, amending, abridging and
censoring the record to point the finger of responsibility to
others, begging society's pity and solace for pain suggested to
have been shared by no other people and never publicly
recognizing, though surely perceiving, that it has been their
centuries-long manipulation of their fellow man and their
self-ordination as gods that has cause the animosity they
correctly sense.
Consider an alien system with such a firm hold on American
policy mechanisms that they are capable of having American
citizenship granted overnight to one of Zionism's most energetic
employees and then have him named as American ambassador to his
former employer nation and confirmed without a word from our
'illustrious Senate,' including that great defender of American
interests, Mr. Jesse Helms?
And consider a President's cabinet with 80% Jewish Zionist
members and a President, himself a Rhodes Scholar (but unable to
finish at Oxford) and a member of the Zionist International; a
Trilateralist, Bilderberg secret communist.
Consider an alien philosophy carefully scheming to own and
control America's newspaper and broadcasting systems, then
combining its now massive propaganda and reinstruc-tional
capabilities with the movie, entertainment and documentary
producers of Hollywood, in short order reducing life to drugs
and sexual fantasies and living to a succession of mindless
escapades and romps in the hay; surely and continuously changing
Americans then America... finally creating such irresponsible
and chaotic conditions in our lives that we then welcome massive
regulation, police restraints and New World Order socialist
oppression just to get order again; forget morality or social
ethics, productivity or national focus.
Consider the raw source of energy and money for the pro-abortion
and homosexual lifestyle movements, the illegal immigration
madness, loss of personal heritage identity, multi-cultural
disarray and the move to make our precious English subordinate
to the first choice of everyone's original homeland language.
These are funded, not by the grassroots but by single source
money ...given in every case to reduce our influential Christian
nation to helplessness; Babylonians filled with hate for the
Christian people who bade them welcome, spending enormous effort
and endless dollars to destroy our once wholesome influence on
an ugly world. Witness the altered state of church in America;
intimidated, compromised, fearful and spiritless. Are they
winning? Look and listen to the new mores of our changed society.
Consider which nation is our number one recipient of loans' and
aid. Note that they take what they want from our military
arsenal and then without apology copy and sell it around the
world, wherever money is to be made or counties subverted. Note
their demand for U.N. (American) troops to clear away the enemy
which surrounds their homeland and as stalking horses for their
political influence thought the world. From the Pentagon, State,
Presidency or the United Nations, their influence and numbers
overwhelm any possible opposition and America increasingly does
what they demand of us.
And then, dear friends, we have just witnessed once again their
absolute mastery over our financial affairs. They own Banking,
Investment Banking, the control of every major corporation, of
course the 'Fed' and control of the Treasury of the United
States. As we have just seen in Mexico, they do as they please,
manipulating conditions, loaning then withdrawing support
capital and grasping control of the resources of nations one by
one, sometimes for profit but always for control. And then there
is the depreciating dollar and Americans and the humble Mexicans
are about to be enslaved by its demise.
When we add thought-control (political correctness) emanating
from our college campuses and the continuous flow of Marxist
ideas from Zionist professors to the 'hate crimes' laws and the
massive effort to close down unwelcome publishers and Republican
ideas, we can see that our Zionist fascist New World Order
elitists have left no scheme destructive of Christian freedom
left unutilized.
Consider then the 'we-are-in-charge' arrogance of the 'Justice'
department's 92 Waco murders, followed by official lies and
media cover-up, to be followed by massive raids on the citizens'
militias that resulted... and national martial law, orchestrated
and controlled by our Zionist fascist President in collaboration
with the ADL.
Finally, we can watch with dismay as black- shirted, hooded
world police power is deployed in America, computer programs are
prepared for our personal control and prisons are readied for
any who would underscore their First Amendment rights by using
them. And huge funds of propaganda and money are expended to
take from us our last hope of freedom; the Second Amendment and
our guns.
And 90% of Americans haven't a hint, a clue. So brainwashed are
they that when push comes to shove, most of them will
unknowingly side with this enemy. So we who perceive must do the
work of thousands."
(Ameirch Focus, Commentaries on America).
P-Dub
You are a Jew-hating propaganda machine. Congrats for being an asshole.
You have posted 100% bullshit. Did you cut/paste this from jewwatch, or
some other site for complete losers like you?
P-Dub: Why don't you try getting a life, shithead?