50 years of JFK conspiracy theories

[Dave Reitzes]

50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I argue that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in misconceptions about the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and explain why it still matters today.

http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the-skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

[tom...@cox.net]

HEY DAVID;
HOW LONG HAVE YOU OWNED YOUR OWN SET OF THE COMMISSION'S 26 VOLUMES ? ? ? ?
OR, ARE JUST ANOTHERE SAASSHOLE WITH
"OPINIONS" THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO BASIS ! ! !
===========================================================================

=====Dave Reitzes <drei...@aol.com> wrote:
> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial

> fi= ndings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I
> argue = that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in
> misconceptions abo= ut the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and
> explain why it still matter= s today.
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the
> -s= keptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

[Jason Burke]

On 9/25/2014 3:28 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> HEY DAVID;
> HOW LONG HAVE YOU OWNED YOUR OWN SET OF THE COMMISSION'S 26 VOLUMES ? ? ? ?
> OR, ARE JUST ANOTHERE SAASSHOLE WITH
> "OPINIONS" THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO BASIS ! ! !
> ===========================================================================
> =====Dave Reitzes <drei...@aol.com> wrote:
>> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial
>> fi= ndings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I
>> argue = that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in
>> misconceptions abo= ut the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and
>> explain why it still matter= s today.
>>
>> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the
>> -s= keptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/
>

Hey Tommie-boy!
Does Ellen like it in the SAASSHOLE?
Might've resulted in a few less illegitimate kids, huh?

[tom...@cox.net]

WE HAVE FOUR KIDS, ALL OF WHOM MAKE IN EXCESS OF $100K PER YEAR YOU ASSHOLE
WANNA TELL US ABOUT YOUR KIDS WHO ALL WORK INSIDE A TENT THAT YO PAY A
QUARTER TO ENTER ! ! !
===========================================================================
===

[tgun...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:09:55 PM UTC-4, Dave Reitzes wrote:
> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I argue that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in misconceptions about the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and explain why it still matters today.
>
>
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the-skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

The Mossad Assassinated JFK
Smoking Gun Evidence from Mossad Whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky

IF THE LINKS DON'T WORK, COPY AND PASTE THIS INTO YOUR EMAIL

There is circumstantial and direct evidence, that the Mossad assassinated JFK, and it comes from two diverse sources.
The circumstantial evidence is to be found in Jim Garrison's book "On The Trail Of The Assassins", henceforth OTTOTA
The direct or "smoking gun" evidence, is found Victor Ostrovsky's book, "By Way Of Deception".
If you only read one book on the JFK assassination, this should be the one:

http://www.amazon.ca/On-Trail-Assassins-Jim-Garrison/dp/0446362778

The Garrison probe was the only real investigation into the JFK slaying. Both official investigations, The Warren Commission, (WC) and the House Select Committee On Assassinations (HSCA) were cover ups, staffed by lawyers who were Mossad "sayanim":

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayanim

Click on "translate" on the right side to view it in English.

Mossad "sayanim" must be 100% Jewish (Ostrovsky, BWOD p.86). That means both parents are born of Jewish mothers. So the definition of "a Jew" is anyone born of a "Jewish" mother. This has nothing to do with religion. It has to do with purity of race.

The Mossad has 500,000 to 1,000,000 sayanim worldwide, according to Gordon Thomas, author of "Gideon's Spies" at about the 4 minute mark of the video below:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3e9_1267149761

The direct evidence comes from Mossad whistleblowers Victor Ostrovsky and Ephraim Halevy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ostrovsky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efraim_Halevy

Ostrovsky wrote two books, "By Way Of Deception", henceforth BWOD, and "The Other Side Of Deception", henceforth TOSOD:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Deception

If you read TOSOD you will discover that Ostrovsky was a patsy, a front man and a mouthpiece for the senior Mossad career man Halevy and his clique (TOSOD p 223)
Halevy in fact set up Ostrovsky (TOSOD p 40)

"By Way Of Deception" in pdf format is here:

http://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/by-way-of-deception-ostrovsky.pdf

"The Other Side Of Deception" on line is here:

http://solargeneral.com/library/other-side-of-deception-victor-ostrovsky.pdf

The circumstantial evidence developed by Garrison and his probe is as follows:

David Ferrie to Guy Banister and Clay Shaw

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ferrie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Banister

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Shaw

Clay Shaw was the money behind the Banister operation in New Orleans that "sheep dipped" Lee Harvey Oswald:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sheep%20dipped

Clay Shaw to Louis Bloomfield

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Bloomfield

Shaw and Bloomfield to Permindex-both were board members and Permindex was a Mossad front. Bloomfield was a spook and a Zionist and close to the Bronfman family. Edgar Bronfman has been a past president of the World Jewish Congress.

Permindex to Tibor Rosenbaum, majority shareholder, a Zionist and money launderer for Meyer Lansky and Israel:

http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Tibor_Rosenbaum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permindex

Garrison, OTTOTA pages 101-103, links between Shaw, Bloomfield and Permindex

The direct or "smoking gun" evidence from Ostrovsky-Halevy is detailed below:

By Way Of Deception, or BWOD pdf:

http://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/by-way-of-deception-ostrovsky.pdf

The Other Side Of Deception, or TOSOD online:

http://solargeneral.com/library/other-side-of-deception-victor-ostrovsky.pdf


BWOD p 141

"One particularly intriguing aspect of the course was movie called, "A President on the Crosshairs", a detailed study of the November 22, 1963, assassination of John F.Kennedy.
The Mossad theory was that the killers-Mafiosa hit men, not Lee Harvey Oswald-actually wanted to murder then Texas governor John Connally, who was in the car with JFK but only wounded. Oswald was seen as a dupe in the whole thing and Connally as the target of mobsters trying to muscle their way into the oil business.
The Mossad believed that the official version of the assassination was pure, unadulterated hokum. To test their theory, they did a simulation exercise of the
presidential cavalcade to see if expert marksmen with far better equipment than Oswald's could hit a moving target from the recorded distance of 88 yards. They
couldn't.

It would have been the perfect cover. If Connally had been killed, everyone would have assumed it was an attempt on JFK. If they'd wanted to get Kennedy, they could have got him anywhere. A single bullet is supposed to have gone through the back of Kennedy's
head, out his chest, and into Connally. If you look at the film, you'll see those points were not aligned. If ever a bullet could do the Waltzing Matilda, that was it.

The Mossad had every film taken of the Dallas assassination, pictures of the area, the topography, aerial photographs, everything. Using mannequins, they duplicated the presidential cavalcade over and over again. Professionals will do a job in the same way. If I'm going to use a high-powered rifle, there are very few places I'd work from, and ideally I'd want a place where I held the target for the longest possible time, where I could get closest to it, but still create the least disturbance. Based on that, we picked a few likely places, and we had more than one person doing the shooting from more than one angle.

Oswald had used a mail order, bolt-action, clip-fed 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano rifle, with a four-power telescopic sight. He'd bought it through a catalogue for $21.45. He also had a .38 Smith & Wesson revolver. It was never determined whether he had fired two rounds or three, but he used regular military full-jacketed cartridges with a muzzle velocity of 2,165 feet per second.

During the simulation exercise, the Mossad, using better, more powerful equipment, would aim their rifles, which were set up on tripods, and when the moment came they'd say "bang" over the loudspeakers and a laser direction-finder would show where the
people in the car would have been hit, and the bullet exits. According to what we found, the rifle was probably aimed at the back of Connally's head, and JFK gestured or moved just at the wrong moment-or possibly the assassin hesitated.

It was just an exercise. But it showed that it was impossible to do what Oswald was supposed to have done. He wasn't even a professional. Look at the distance, from the sixth-floor window of a building, the kind of equipment he had. He didn't even reinforce
the bullets. The guy had just bought the rifle. Anyone knows it takes time and skill to adjust the telescopic sights on a new rifle. The official version just isn't believable."

Ibid, p. 174

"Many of the training courses were taught by those who had carried out various Mossad operations. The trainees studied these operations in minute detail, REENACTING THEM, having every detail explained. In addition, my open access to the Mossad computer allowed me to build up a vast knowledge of the organization and its activities, many of which you are now going to read about, and much of it for the first time."
[Capitals added]

Ibid, p. 53

"During this period, WE DO NOT HAVE TEACHERS. WE HAVE PEOPLE FROM THE FIELD WHO ARE DEVOTING A TERM OF THEIR TIME TO THE ACADEMY TO BE YOUR INSTRUCTORS..." [Capitals added]


Ibid, p. 27

"...They [Israeli air force] had practiced over their own territory however, ON A MODEL OF A PLANT , before heading off to attack the real thing." (Capitals added)
(Israel's bombing of Iraq's nuclear reactor at Osirak.)


Daniel Raviv, Yossi Melman, "Every Spy a Prince"

http://adobebookcafe.com/images/0395581206.JPG
Houghton Mifflin, 1990
p. 396

"...Eight commandos, driven by the Mossad woman in the other Volkswagen minibus, pulled up in front of Wazir's home. In two task forces of four men each, they swiftly assaulted the house. THEY HAD PRACTICED ON A SIMILAR VILLA IN ISRAEL. SUCH REHEARSALS IN MODELS OF THE TARGET, OFTEN SPECIALLY BUILT, ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE ISRAELIS TO BE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY BEFORE EMBARKING ON COMPLEX MISSIONS BEHIND ENEMY LINES."
[Capitals added]


Ostrovsky mentioned the above book in the postscript to the paperback edition of "By Way Of Deception". He said that he had been told by one of the authors that the Mossad did have a plan to kidnap him in Canada and bring him to Israel to stand trial.

I suspected that Ostrovsky may have have had other motives for citing this book, so I decided to read it. When I came across this bit, I felt the hair on the back stand up. It was, I believed, corroboration that the Mossad constructs exact replicas of their targets, and that the duplicate of the JFK motorcade built by the Mossad was used to practice the assassination, and not to test its ridiculous theory.

What Ostrovsky and Halevy have described above, in some detail, is a Mossad training exercise, based on a past Mossad operation.
The past Mossad operation was the JFK assassination. The Mossad then made a training exercise out of it.
This is smoking gun evidence that the Mossad assassinated JFK

What they are describing is how the Mossad practiced the assassination: "...using mannequins they duplicated the presidential cavalcade over and over again...".
That is how professionals plan an assassination: they practice it over and over again, until the get the timing down.
The entire shooting sequence in Dallas took six seconds.
No one is more professional at assassinations than the unit Ostrovsky was being trained for: The Kidon unit of the Mossad, which carries out abductions and assassinations.
When I first read this, I took it at face value and I laughed. The Mossad thought that the official theory was farce, but they came up with a theory of their own that was absolutely ridiculous. I said to myself at that time: "What a bunch of morons. No way could the mob pull a hit like this".
And I kept reading. The more I read, the more I realized that the Mossad were not morons. Especially when I finished reading chapter 13, "Helping Arafat".
This was a successful Mossad operation. Arafat wanted to buy weapons for his Force 17, and wanted to sell hashish in order to finance the purchase. He also planned to get a short term loan from a Swiss banker to pay for the weapons. Mossad learned of this from their assets and put together a plan to get everything: The guns, the money from the Swiss banker, and the hashish. AND THEY PULLED IT OFF.
At that point, I put the book down and said: "These guys are not morons. In fact, they are anything BUT morons. That thing about the JFK assassination doesn't add up when taken at face value".
So I went back and looked at it anew, and quickly realized, that Victor Ostrovsky had blown the whistle on the Mossad's assassination of JFK

When Ostrovsky was turfed from the Mossad, he realized that the Mossad tried to get him killed. On page 172 of BWOD he says that he was informed that his file carried a request to transfer him to liaison with the Southern Lebanese army. Ostrovsky describes that "as good as a death warrant for an ex-Mossad man".

After his book was published in the USA and Canada, Ostrovsky received a death threat on the Canadian television program Canada AM from a Josef Lapid:

http://www.mediamonitors.net/ostrovsky2.html

What Ostrovsky described on pages 141-143 of BWOD cannot be taken at face value. Things just do not add up.
All one needs to do is ask some basic questions and the whole cover story unravels:

-What evidence does the Mossad base its ridiculous theory on-that Mafiosi hitmen carried out the assassination?

-How is the Mossad testing this ridiculous theory by doing this so-called exercise?
If they were testing a theory they would not need to practice it over and over again. You practice something over and over again in order to perfect it, get the timing down.

-How could the mob move into the oil business by assassinating John Connally?

-Could the mob get JFK anywhere? No they could not. JFK had the Secret Service to protect him, Connally did not.

-Professionals will do a job in the same way: by practicing it over and over again. And no one is more professional that the unit Ostrovsky was being groomed for: The Kidon unit of the Mossad, its professional assassins.

-"...Based on that, we picked a few places..." Here, the Kidon trainees are reenacting the JFK assassination. Ostrovsky tells his reader in BWOD p 174, that the trainees studied past Mossad operations in minute detail and then re enacted them.
The question asked of the cadet was likely this: These are aerial photographs of the Dealey Plaza, this is the topography, where would you put the shooters? Ostrovsky goes on to say "based on this WE (the cadets) picked a few likely places and had more than one shooter shooting from more than one angle".

Furthermore, Raviv and Melman tell us in "Every Spy A Prince", p 396, that the Mossad practices their hits on models of their targets.

See this article on the Mossad's killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist, and its use of a model of the target's home under the subheading "planting the bomb":

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12191203

"The Mossad had every film taken of the assassination, aerial photographs, pictures of the area, everything". In other words everything an agency would need to practice the assassination.

The conclusion also doesn't add up: "according to what we found, the rifle was probably aimed at the back of Connally's head, and JFK gestured or moved just at the wrong moment-or possibly the assassin hesitated.

-The Zapruder film makes it obvious that JFK was hit from the right front as well as the rear.
-When the limo emerged from behind the Stemmons freeway sign, JFK had been hit in the neck-from the front-and slumped to his LEFT. By falling to his left, he exposed Connally's BACK to shots from the rear. Connally was shot in the right rib, and right wrist, and a bullet had lodged into his LEFT thigh. So these bullets were meant for JFK.
-The fatal head shot leaves no doubt that the assassins were after JFK and not Connally.

So, either Halevy and Ostrovsky are telling their readers: DO NOT TAKE THIS AT FACE VALUE, or, the tale that the Mossad did this simulation exercise in order to test their ridiculous theory is a very thin cover story devised by their psychological warfare department called LAP-and the Mossad agents acting as teachers told this to the new Kidon recruits.

Furthermore, since Ostrovsky says that the Mossad does not have teachers as such, but members of the Mossad who are acting as teachers to the cadets, and that "many of the training courses were taught by those who carried out various Mossad operations", it is very likely that some of the personnel that carried out the JFK assassination instructed Ostrovsky and the other Kidon trainees during this training exercise.

Only two pages earlier in BWOD, on page 139, Ostrovsky and the other Kidon trainees participate in a training exercise that teaches them how to assassinate an agent who had gone astray, and to make it look like an accident. Then, two pages later, Ostrovsky tells his readers about the JFK hit, which was, as I have pointed out, a Mossad assassination.


THE COVER UP DEVICE

The Warren Commission was the cover up device, and it was staffed, as I said earlier, by mostly if not entirely Mossad sayanim lawyers:

David Belin, Jewish. Mossad sayanim, once again, must be 100% Jewish:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_W._Belin

Arlen Specter, Jewish, and architect of the Magic Bullet Theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlen_Specter

http://www.jfk-assassination.de/images/bullet2.gif

Other lawyers on the Warren Commission with Jewish names: Goldberg, Eisenberg, Weinreb, Adams, Hubert, Stern, Jenner, Willens, Redlich, Liebeler, Ely, Laulicht, Marmor, Mosk and Pollak. Slawson's family probably changed their name from Slawski. Mossad sayanim must be 100%, and since the lawyers on the WC have Jewish names, it appears they were 100% Jewish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Redlich

http://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=marmor

http://archive.jta.org/article/1967/05/19/2749379/american-jewish-committee-opens-fourday-meeting-slawson-fund-announced

http://njjewishnews.com/article/4707/at-risk-youth-get-second-home-in-ofakim#.UD3TMcFlQ1c

JFK was shot from the right front. A number of qualified medical personnel described a massive, gaping wound in the occipitoparietal area, Drs McClelland, Dr Peters, Dr Carrico, Dr Jones, and nurse Boron, to name a few:

http://www.jfklancer.com/Peters.html

http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/16th_issue/mcclelland.html

http://www.artearthmann.com/conspiracyFolder/assetsFolder/jfk_headWitnesses700x400.jpg

The autopsy photographs show the back of the head to be completely intact, so they were obviously faked:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JP7rDYY2k3k/UDFCQfjzV2I/AAAAAAAAABM/VSzloAkM0_c/s640/JFK%2Bback%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bhead.jpg

The autopsy photos and X rays were always in the possession of the US Secret Service, so you can rule out Soviets, Cubans, pro or anti Castro, and the mob as possible suspects in the conspiracy to fake this evidence.
The only possible explanation is Mossad sayanim in the Secret Service, which had the photos, and also permitted the assassination to take place in Dallas.
Kellerman is an Ashkenazic name:

http://hipsterjew.com/2012/08/book-review-kellermans-potboiler-in-name-only/

Roy Kellerman was the Secret Service agent who hijacked JFK's corpse, at gunpoint, from Parkland Hospital, contrary to Texas law, to Bethesda Naval Hospital, for an autopsy that left much to be desired:

http://www.jfkmontreal.com/inside_parkland.htm

THE MEDIA

The role of the media in the cover up: By Hennelly and Policoff

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=104x5469960

Who own the US media:

Lenni Brenner, "Jews In America Today", Lyle Stuart, Secaucus 1985, p 324

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/518zongqwYL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

"...The NEW YORK TIMES,easily the most important daily, is owned by
the Sulzbergers.Katherine Graham, of Jewish descent, owns the WASHINGTON
POST and NEWSWEEK.Walter Annenberg owns TV GUIDE...US NEW AND WORLD
REPORT and THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY are owned by Mort Zuckerman.Sam
Newhouse owns VANITY FAIR, VOGUE,...RANDOM HOUSE PUBLISHING..."

"...Jews founded the three TV networks. CBS is still(1985) strongly
Jewish...However ABC has merged with Capital Cities Communications...NBC
was founded by David Sarnoff (look up David Sarnoff's name in Garrison's book OTTOTA)..."
"...In November 1976, Israel Bonds put on a fashion show in
Washington. Among the models were Mrs.DAVID BRINKLEY, MRS. MARTIN
AGRONSKY, AND MRS.DAN RATHER.It is also revealing that some of the other
models were Mrs.HENRY JACKSON, wife of the pro-Israeli "Senator from
Boeing", Mrs. JOSEPH SISCO, wife of the ex-Under Secretary of
State.Present were the wives of the Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court,the Secretary of Defense,the Attorney General,and the head of the
Federal Reserve Board.OBVIOUSLY SOME LEADING TV NEWS PEOPLE ARE TOO
CLOSE TO THE ZIONISTS.BUT AREN'T THEY ALSO FAR TOO INTIMATE WITH THE
ENTIRE POWER STRUCTURE IN THIS COUNTRY?"

Oliver Stone wrote this foreword in Fletcher Prouty's book:

http://www.nerjabookcentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/JFK-747x1024.jpg


"...Where, in the last twenty years, have we seen serious research
from Tom Wicker, Dan Rather, Anthony Lewis, George Lardner, Ken
Auchincloss, into Lee Harvey Oswald's movements in the months and years
before 22 November 1963?..."(Needless to say all these fine reporters
are Jews and I would say, Mossad sayanim)

Oliver Stone had this to say on disc two of his motion picture JFK:

"These journalists are trained Doberman Pinschers. They're protecting something. They're protecting an old crime".

Oliver Stone is "Jewish":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Stone

The national US media attacked Garrison and his probe into the JFK murder:

Garrison, OTTOTA, pp 152, 174, 186-188, 192-199, 295

and defended the Lone Assassin theory:

Garrison, OTTOTA, pp 4-5, 248-250, 294-295

Who owns the US media today?

http://rense.com/general44/sevenjewishamericans.htm

Oswald, the patsy, was silenced by a "Jew" named Jacob Rubenstein, aka Jack Ruby.
If you read his testimony, you will discover that Ruby said that his lawyer told him to say that he shot LHO in order to save Jackie Kennedy the pain of having to testify at LHO's trial.
Ruby gave a private interview to journalist Dorothy Kilgallen. She later told acquaintances that she was about to break the case. Shortly afterwards, she died:

http://911review.org/Alex/Kilgallen_murdered.html

Israel stole its weapons grade uranium from the US:

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2011/Dec-05/155997-israel-stole-uranium-from-us-report-will-show.ashx#axzz24uTqOvn8

Five different US administrations covered it up. You can read about it in this book:

http://www.bookfever.com/book_photos/45186.jpg

Why isn't the IAEA investigating Dimona? Is it an Israeli spy front?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/25/iaea-cries-wolf-over-iran-nukes/

You can also read about the "close relationship" between the US and Israel in this book:

http://www.the-savoisien.com/blog/public/img11/they_dare_to_speak_out_paul_findley.png

If the people running the US government were Italians, or Irish, or British, then the US would have close ties with Italy, or Ireland, or Britain. The US has "close ties" with israel because the politicians are openly Jewish like Lieberman, Levin, Boxer and others, or Kryptos like the Bush family.
Moron Bush has first cousins named Ellis and Harris:both are Ashkenazic names.
In fact, from Roosevelt to this clown who's in the White House now, every American president has been a "Jew" except for JFK, who was executed in Dallas, and Clinton, who was impeached by the Mossad. Lewinsky, Tripp, Starr, Lucianne Goldberg, Henry Hyde, Tom DeLay, Bob Barr, all Ashkenazim by birth (born of "Jewish" mothers, who are born of "Jewish" mothers, and so on) and Mossad sayanim.

[tgun...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:09:55 PM UTC-4, Dave Reitzes wrote:

> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I argue that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in misconceptions about the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and explain why it still matters today.
>
>
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the-skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

how kosher is Dave Reitzes?

[tom...@cox.net]

looks an awful lot lot like the rantings f that infamous anti-Semite "BUD"

! ! !
===========================================================================
===

tgun...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:09:55 PM UTC-4, Dave Reitzes wrote:
> > 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly

> > controversial =

> findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I

> argu= e that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in
> misconceptions a= bout the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and
> explain why it still matt= ers today.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-t
> > he=

> -skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/
>
> The Mossad Assassinated JFK
> Smoking Gun Evidence from Mossad Whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky
>
> IF THE LINKS DON'T WORK, COPY AND PASTE THIS INTO YOUR EMAIL
>
> There is circumstantial and direct evidence, that the Mossad assassinated

> J= FK, and it comes from two diverse sources.

> The circumstantial evidence is to be found in Jim Garrison's book "On The

> T= rail Of The Assassins", henceforth OTTOTA

> The direct or "smoking gun" evidence, is found Victor Ostrovsky's book,

> "By=

> Way Of Deception".
> If you only read one book on the JFK assassination, this should be the
> one:
>
> http://www.amazon.ca/On-Trail-Assassins-Jim-Garrison/dp/0446362778
>
> The Garrison probe was the only real investigation into the JFK slaying.

> Bo= th official investigations, The Warren Commission, (WC) and the House
> Selec= t Committee On Assassinations (HSCA) were cover ups, staffed by
> lawyers who=

> were Mossad "sayanim":
>
> http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayanim
>
> Click on "translate" on the right side to view it in English.
>
> Mossad "sayanim" must be 100% Jewish (Ostrovsky, BWOD p.86). That means

> bot= h parents are born of Jewish mothers. So the definition of "a Jew"
> is anyon= e born of a "Jewish" mother. This has nothing to do with
> religion. It has t= o do with purity of race.

>
> The Mossad has 500,000 to 1,000,000 sayanim worldwide, according to

> Gordon = Thomas, author of "Gideon's Spies" at about the 4 minute mark of
> the video = below:
>
> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3D3e9_1267149761

>
> The direct evidence comes from Mossad whistleblowers Victor Ostrovsky and

> E= phraim Halevy:

>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ostrovsky
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efraim_Halevy
>
> Ostrovsky wrote two books, "By Way Of Deception", henceforth BWOD, and

> "The=

> Other Side Of Deception", henceforth TOSOD:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Deception
>
> If you read TOSOD you will discover that Ostrovsky was a patsy, a front

> man=

> and a mouthpiece for the senior Mossad career man Halevy and his clique

> (T= OSOD p 223)

> Halevy in fact set up Ostrovsky (TOSOD p 40)
>
> "By Way Of Deception" in pdf format is here:
>
> http://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/by-way-of-deception

> -o= strovsky.pdf

>
> "The Other Side Of Deception" on line is here:
>
> http://solargeneral.com/library/other-side-of-deception-victor-ostrovsky.

> pd= f

>
> The circumstantial evidence developed by Garrison and his probe is as

> follo= ws:

>
> David Ferrie to Guy Banister and Clay Shaw
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ferrie
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Banister
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Shaw
>
> Clay Shaw was the money behind the Banister operation in New Orleans that

> "= sheep dipped" Lee Harvey Oswald:
>
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=3Dsheep%20dipped

>
> Clay Shaw to Louis Bloomfield
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Bloomfield
>
> Shaw and Bloomfield to Permindex-both were board members and Permindex

> was = a Mossad front. Bloomfield was a spook and a Zionist and close to
> the Bronf= man family. Edgar Bronfman has been a past president of the
> World Jewish Co= ngress.

>
> Permindex to Tibor Rosenbaum, majority shareholder, a Zionist and money

> lau= nderer for Meyer Lansky and Israel:

>
> http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Tibor_Rosenbaum
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permindex
>
> Garrison, OTTOTA pages 101-103, links between Shaw, Bloomfield and

> Perminde= x

>
> The direct or "smoking gun" evidence from Ostrovsky-Halevy is detailed

> belo= w:

>
> By Way Of Deception, or BWOD pdf:
>
> http://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/by-way-of-deception

> -o= strovsky.pdf

>
> The Other Side Of Deception, or TOSOD online:
>
> http://solargeneral.com/library/other-side-of-deception-victor-ostrovsky.

> pd= f

>
> BWOD p 141
>
> "One particularly intriguing aspect of the course was movie called, "A

> Pres= ident on the Crosshairs", a detailed study of the November 22,
> 1963, assass= ination of John F.Kennedy.

> The Mossad theory was that the killers-Mafiosa hit men, not Lee Harvey

> Oswa= ld-actually wanted to murder then Texas governor John Connally, who
> was in = the car with JFK but only wounded. Oswald was seen as a dupe in
> the whole t= hing and Connally as the target of mobsters trying to muscle
> their way into=

> the oil business.
> The Mossad believed that the official version of the assassination was

> pure= , unadulterated hokum. To test their theory, they did a simulation
> exercise=

> of the
> presidential cavalcade to see if expert marksmen with far better

> equipment = than Oswald's could hit a moving target from the recorded
> distance of 88 ya= rds. They

> couldn't.
>
> It would have been the perfect cover. If Connally had been killed,

> everyone=

> would have assumed it was an attempt on JFK. If they'd wanted to get

> Kenne= dy, they could have got him anywhere. A single bullet is supposed
> to have g= one through the back of Kennedy's

> head, out his chest, and into Connally. If you look at the film, you'll

> see=

> those points were not aligned. If ever a bullet could do the Waltzing

> Mati= lda, that was it.

>
> The Mossad had every film taken of the Dallas assassination, pictures of

> th= e area, the topography, aerial photographs, everything. Using
> mannequins, t= hey duplicated the presidential cavalcade over and over
> again. Professional= s will do a job in the same way. If I'm going to use
> a high-powered rifle, = there are very few places I'd work from, and
> ideally I'd want a place where=

> I held the target for the longest possible time, where I could get

> closest= to it, but still create the least disturbance. Based on that,
> we picked a = few likely places, and we had more than one person doing
> the shooting from = more than one angle.

>
> Oswald had used a mail order, bolt-action, clip-fed 6.5 mm

> Mannlicher-Carca= no rifle, with a four-power telescopic sight. He'd
> bought it through a cata= logue for $21.45. He also had a .38 Smith &
> Wesson revolver. It was never d= etermined whether he had fired two
> rounds or three, but he used regular mil= itary full-jacketed cartridges
> with a muzzle velocity of 2,165 feet per sec= ond.

>
> During the simulation exercise, the Mossad, using better, more powerful

> equ= ipment, would aim their rifles, which were set up on tripods, and
> when the = moment came they'd say "bang" over the loudspeakers and a
> laser direction-f= inder would show where the

> people in the car would have been hit, and the bullet exits. According to

> w= hat we found, the rifle was probably aimed at the back of Connally's
> head, = and JFK gestured or moved just at the wrong moment-or possibly
> the assassin=

> hesitated.
>
> It was just an exercise. But it showed that it was impossible to do what

> Os= wald was supposed to have done. He wasn't even a professional. Look
> at the = distance, from the sixth-floor window of a building, the kind of
> equipment = he had. He didn't even reinforce

> the bullets. The guy had just bought the rifle. Anyone knows it takes

> time = and skill to adjust the telescopic sights on a new rifle. The
> official vers= ion just isn't believable."

>
> Ibid, p. 174
>
> "Many of the training courses were taught by those who had carried out

> vari= ous Mossad operations. The trainees studied these operations in
> minute deta= il, REENACTING THEM, having every detail explained. In
> addition, my open ac= cess to the Mossad computer allowed me to build up
> a vast knowledge of the = organization and its activities, many of which
> you are now going to read ab= out, and much of it for the first time."

> [Capitals added]
>
> Ibid, p. 53
>
> "During this period, WE DO NOT HAVE TEACHERS. WE HAVE PEOPLE FROM THE

> FIELD= WHO ARE DEVOTING A TERM OF THEIR TIME TO THE ACADEMY TO BE YOUR
> INSTRUCTOR= S..." [Capitals added]

>
> Ibid, p. 27
>
> "...They [Israeli air force] had practiced over their own territory

> however= , ON A MODEL OF A PLANT , before heading off to attack the real
> thing." (Ca= pitals added)

> (Israel's bombing of Iraq's nuclear reactor at Osirak.)
>
> Daniel Raviv, Yossi Melman, "Every Spy a Prince"
>
> http://adobebookcafe.com/images/0395581206.JPG
> Houghton Mifflin, 1990
> p. 396
>
> "...Eight commandos, driven by the Mossad woman in the other Volkswagen

> min= ibus, pulled up in front of Wazir's home. In two task forces of four
> men ea= ch, they swiftly assaulted the house. THEY HAD PRACTICED ON A
> SIMILAR VILLA=

> IN ISRAEL. SUCH REHEARSALS IN MODELS OF THE TARGET, OFTEN SPECIALLY

> BUILT,= ARE

> CONSIDERED BY THE ISRAELIS TO BE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY BEFORE EMBARKING ON

> C= OMPLEX MISSIONS BEHIND ENEMY LINES."

> [Capitals added]
>
> Ostrovsky mentioned the above book in the postscript to the paperback

> editi= on of "By Way Of Deception". He said that he had been told by one
> of the au= thors that the Mossad did have a plan to kidnap him in Canada
> and bring him=

> to Israel to stand trial.
>
> I suspected that Ostrovsky may have have had other motives for citing

> this = book, so I decided to read it. When I came across this bit, I felt
> the hair=

> on the back stand up. It was, I believed, corroboration that the Mossad

> co= nstructs exact replicas of their targets, and that the duplicate of
> the JFK=

> motorcade built by the Mossad was used to practice the assassination,

> and = not to test its ridiculous theory.

>
> What Ostrovsky and Halevy have described above, in some detail, is a

> Mossad=

> training exercise, based on a past Mossad operation.
> The past Mossad operation was the JFK assassination. The Mossad then made

> a=

> training exercise out of it.
> This is smoking gun evidence that the Mossad assassinated JFK
>
> What they are describing is how the Mossad practiced the assassination:

> "..= .using mannequins they duplicated the presidential cavalcade over
> and over = again...".

> That is how professionals plan an assassination: they practice it over

> and = over again, until the get the timing down.

> The entire shooting sequence in Dallas took six seconds.
> No one is more professional at assassinations than the unit Ostrovsky was

> b= eing trained for: The Kidon unit of the Mossad, which carries out
> abduction= s and assassinations.

> When I first read this, I took it at face value and I laughed. The Mossad

> t= hought that the official theory was farce, but they came up with a
> theory o= f their own that was absolutely ridiculous. I said to myself at
> that time: = "What a bunch of morons. No way could the mob pull a hit

> like this". And I kept reading. The more I read, the more I realized that

> the Mossad we= re not morons. Especially when I finished reading chapter
> 13, "Helping Araf= at".

> This was a successful Mossad operation. Arafat wanted to buy weapons for

> hi= s Force 17, and wanted to sell hashish in order to finance the
> purchase. He=

> also planned to get a short term loan from a Swiss banker to pay for the

> w= eapons. Mossad learned of this from their assets and put together a
> plan to=

> get everything: The guns, the money from the Swiss banker, and the

> hashish= . AND THEY PULLED IT OFF.

> At that point, I put the book down and said: "These guys are not morons.

> In=

> fact, they are anything BUT morons. That thing about the JFK

> assassination= doesn't add up when taken at face value".

> So I went back and looked at it anew, and quickly realized, that Victor

> Ost= rovsky had blown the whistle on the Mossad's assassination of JFK

>
> When Ostrovsky was turfed from the Mossad, he realized that the Mossad

> trie= d to get him killed. On page 172 of BWOD he says that he was
> informed that = his file carried a request to transfer him to liaison
> with the Southern Leb= anese army. Ostrovsky describes that "as good as a
> death warrant for an ex-= Mossad man".

>
> After his book was published in the USA and Canada, Ostrovsky received a

> de= ath threat on the Canadian television program Canada AM from a Josef

> Lapid:
>
> http://www.mediamonitors.net/ostrovsky2.html
>
> What Ostrovsky described on pages 141-143 of BWOD cannot be taken at face

> v= alue. Things just do not add up.

> All one needs to do is ask some basic questions and the whole cover story

> u= nravels:

>
> -What evidence does the Mossad base its ridiculous theory on-that Mafiosi

> h= itmen carried out the assassination?

>
> -How is the Mossad testing this ridiculous theory by doing this so-called

> e= xercise?

> If they were testing a theory they would not need to practice it over and

> o= ver again. You practice something over and over again in order to
> perfect i= t, get the timing down.

>
> -How could the mob move into the oil business by assassinating John

> Connall= y?

>
> -Could the mob get JFK anywhere? No they could not. JFK had the Secret

> Serv= ice to protect him, Connally did not.

>
> -Professionals will do a job in the same way: by practicing it over and

> ove= r again. And no one is more professional that the unit Ostrovsky was
> being = groomed for: The Kidon unit of the Mossad, its professional

> assassins.
>
> -"...Based on that, we picked a few places..." Here, the Kidon trainees

> are=

> reenacting the JFK assassination. Ostrovsky tells his reader in BWOD p

> 174= , that the trainees studied past Mossad operations in minute detail
> and the= n re enacted them.

> The question asked of the cadet was likely this: These are aerial

> photograp= hs of the Dealey Plaza, this is the topography, where would
> you put the sho= oters? Ostrovsky goes on to say "based on this WE (the
> cadets) picked a few=

> likely places and had more than one shooter shooting from more than one

> an= gle".

>
> Furthermore, Raviv and Melman tell us in "Every Spy A Prince", p 396,

> that = the Mossad practices their hits on models of their targets.

>
> See this article on the Mossad's killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist,

> a= nd its use of a model of the target's home under the subheading
> "planting t= he bomb":

>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12191203
>
> "The Mossad had every film taken of the assassination, aerial

> photographs, = pictures of the area, everything". In other words
> everything an agency woul= d need to practice the assassination.

>
> The conclusion also doesn't add up: "according to what we found, the

> rifle = was probably aimed at the back of Connally's head, and JFK
> gestured or move= d just at the wrong moment-or possibly the assassin

> hesitated.
>
> -The Zapruder film makes it obvious that JFK was hit from the right front

> a= s well as the rear.

> -When the limo emerged from behind the Stemmons freeway sign, JFK had

> been = hit in the neck-from the front-and slumped to his LEFT. By falling
> to his l= eft, he exposed Connally's BACK to shots from the rear.
> Connally was shot i= n the right rib, and right wrist, and a bullet had
> lodged into his LEFT thi= gh. So these bullets were meant for JFK.

> -The fatal head shot leaves no doubt that the assassins were after JFK

> and = not Connally.

>
> So, either Halevy and Ostrovsky are telling their readers: DO NOT TAKE

> THIS=

> AT FACE VALUE, or, the tale that the Mossad did this simulation exercise

> i= n order to test their ridiculous theory is a very thin cover story
> devised = by their psychological warfare department called LAP-and the
> Mossad agents = acting as teachers told this to the new Kidon recruits.

>
> Furthermore, since Ostrovsky says that the Mossad does not have teachers

> as=

> such, but members of the Mossad who are acting as teachers to the

> cadets, = and that "many of the training courses were taught by those who
> carried out=

> various Mossad operations", it is very likely that some of the personnel

> t= hat carried out the JFK assassination instructed Ostrovsky and the
> other Ki= don trainees during this training exercise.

>
> Only two pages earlier in BWOD, on page 139, Ostrovsky and the other

> Kidon = trainees participate in a training exercise that teaches them how
> to assass= inate an agent who had gone astray, and to make it look like
> an accident. T= hen, two pages later, Ostrovsky tells his readers about
> the JFK hit, which = was, as I have pointed out, a Mossad assassination.

>
> THE COVER UP DEVICE
>
> The Warren Commission was the cover up device, and it was staffed, as I

> sai= d earlier, by mostly if not entirely Mossad sayanim lawyers:

>
> David Belin, Jewish. Mossad sayanim, once again, must be 100% Jewish:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_W._Belin
>
> Arlen Specter, Jewish, and architect of the Magic Bullet Theory:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlen_Specter
>
> http://www.jfk-assassination.de/images/bullet2.gif
>
> Other lawyers on the Warren Commission with Jewish names: Goldberg,

> Eisenbe= rg, Weinreb, Adams, Hubert, Stern, Jenner, Willens, Redlich,
> Liebeler, Ely,=

> Laulicht, Marmor, Mosk and Pollak. Slawson's family probably changed

> their= name from Slawski. Mossad sayanim must be 100%, and since the
> lawyers on t= he WC have Jewish names, it appears they were 100% Jewish.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Redlich
>
> http://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=3Dmarmor
>
> http://archive.jta.org/article/1967/05/19/2749379/american-jewish-committ
> ee= -opens-fourday-meeting-slawson-fund-announced
>
> http://njjewishnews.com/article/4707/at-risk-youth-get-second-home-in-ofa
> ki= m#.UD3TMcFlQ1c

>
> JFK was shot from the right front. A number of qualified medical

> personnel = described a massive, gaping wound in the occipitoparietal
> area, Drs McClell= and, Dr Peters, Dr Carrico, Dr Jones, and nurse Boron,

> to name a few:
>
> http://www.jfklancer.com/Peters.html
>
> http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/16th_issue/mcclelland.ht
> ml
>
> http://www.artearthmann.com/conspiracyFolder/assetsFolder/jfk_headWitness

> es= 700x400.jpg

>
> The autopsy photographs show the back of the head to be completely

> intact, = so they were obviously faked:
>
> http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JP7rDYY2k3k/UDFCQfjzV2I/AAAAAAAAABM/VSzloAkM0_c
> /s= 640/JFK%2Bback%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bhead.jpg

>
> The autopsy photos and X rays were always in the possession of the US

> Secre= t Service, so you can rule out Soviets, Cubans, pro or anti
> Castro, and the=

> mob as possible suspects in the conspiracy to fake this evidence.
> The only possible explanation is Mossad sayanim in the Secret Service,

> whic= h had the photos, and also permitted the assassination to take
> place in Dal= las.

> Kellerman is an Ashkenazic name:
>
> http://hipsterjew.com/2012/08/book-review-kellermans-potboiler-in-name-on

> ly= /

>
> Roy Kellerman was the Secret Service agent who hijacked JFK's corpse, at

> gu= npoint, from Parkland Hospital, contrary to Texas law, to Bethesda
> Naval Ho= spital, for an autopsy that left much to be desired:

>
> http://www.jfkmontreal.com/inside_parkland.htm
>
> THE MEDIA
>
> The role of the media in the cover up: By Hennelly and Policoff
>

> http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=3Dview_all&am
> p;= address=3D104x5469960

>
> Who own the US media:
>
> Lenni Brenner, "Jews In America Today", Lyle Stuart, Secaucus 1985, p 324
>
> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/518zongqwYL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
>
> "...The NEW YORK TIMES,easily the most important daily, is owned by
> the Sulzbergers.Katherine Graham, of Jewish descent, owns the WASHINGTON
> POST and NEWSWEEK.Walter Annenberg owns TV GUIDE...US NEW AND WORLD
> REPORT and THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY are owned by Mort Zuckerman.Sam
> Newhouse owns VANITY FAIR, VOGUE,...RANDOM HOUSE PUBLISHING..."
>
> "...Jews founded the three TV networks. CBS is still(1985) strongly
> Jewish...However ABC has merged with Capital Cities Communications...NBC
> was founded by David Sarnoff (look up David Sarnoff's name in Garrison's

> bo= ok OTTOTA)..."

> "...In November 1976, Israel Bonds put on a fashion show in
> Washington. Among the models were Mrs.DAVID BRINKLEY, MRS. MARTIN
> AGRONSKY, AND MRS.DAN RATHER.It is also revealing that some of the other
> models were Mrs.HENRY JACKSON, wife of the pro-Israeli "Senator from
> Boeing", Mrs. JOSEPH SISCO, wife of the ex-Under Secretary of
> State.Present were the wives of the Chief Justice of the Supreme
> Court,the Secretary of Defense,the Attorney General,and the head of the
> Federal Reserve Board.OBVIOUSLY SOME LEADING TV NEWS PEOPLE ARE TOO
> CLOSE TO THE ZIONISTS.BUT AREN'T THEY ALSO FAR TOO INTIMATE WITH THE
> ENTIRE POWER STRUCTURE IN THIS COUNTRY?"
>
> Oliver Stone wrote this foreword in Fletcher Prouty's book:
>
> http://www.nerjabookcentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/JFK-747x1024.jp
> g
>
> "...Where, in the last twenty years, have we seen serious research
> from Tom Wicker, Dan Rather, Anthony Lewis, George Lardner, Ken
> Auchincloss, into Lee Harvey Oswald's movements in the months and years
> before 22 November 1963?..."(Needless to say all these fine reporters
> are Jews and I would say, Mossad sayanim)
>
> Oliver Stone had this to say on disc two of his motion picture JFK:
>
> "These journalists are trained Doberman Pinschers. They're protecting

> somet= hing. They're protecting an old crime".

>
> Oliver Stone is "Jewish":
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Stone
>
> The national US media attacked Garrison and his probe into the JFK
> murder:
>
> Garrison, OTTOTA, pp 152, 174, 186-188, 192-199, 295
>
> and defended the Lone Assassin theory:
>
> Garrison, OTTOTA, pp 4-5, 248-250, 294-295
>
> Who owns the US media today?
>
> http://rense.com/general44/sevenjewishamericans.htm
>
> Oswald, the patsy, was silenced by a "Jew" named Jacob Rubenstein, aka

> Jack=

> Ruby.
> If you read his testimony, you will discover that Ruby said that his

> lawyer=

> told him to say that he shot LHO in order to save Jackie Kennedy the

> pain = of having to testify at LHO's trial.

> Ruby gave a private interview to journalist Dorothy Kilgallen. She later

> to= ld acquaintances that she was about to break the case. Shortly
> afterwards, = she died:

>
> http://911review.org/Alex/Kilgallen_murdered.html
>
> Israel stole its weapons grade uranium from the US:
>
> http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2011/Dec-05/155997-israel-st

> ol= e-uranium-from-us-report-will-show.ashx#axzz24uTqOvn8

>
> Five different US administrations covered it up. You can read about it in

> t= his book:

>
> http://www.bookfever.com/book_photos/45186.jpg
>
> Why isn't the IAEA investigating Dimona? Is it an Israeli spy front?
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/25/iaea-cries-wolf-over-iran-nukes/
>
> You can also read about the "close relationship" between the US and

> Israel = in this book:
>
> http://www.the-savoisien.com/blog/public/img11/they_dare_to_speak_out_pau
> l_= findley.png

>
> If the people running the US government were Italians, or Irish, or

> British= , then the US would have close ties with Italy, or Ireland, or
> Britain. The=

> US has "close ties" with israel because the politicians are openly

> Jewish = like Lieberman, Levin, Boxer and others, or Kryptos like the

> Bush family. Moron Bush has first cousins named Ellis and Harris:both are

> Ashkenazic nam= es.

> In fact, from Roosevelt to this clown who's in the White House now, every

> A= merican president has been a "Jew" except for JFK, who was executed in
> Dall= as, and Clinton, who was impeached by the Mossad. Lewinsky, Tripp,
> Starr, L= ucianne Goldberg, Henry Hyde, Tom DeLay, Bob Barr, all
> Ashkenazim by birth = (born of "Jewish" mothers, who are born of "Jewish"
> mothers, and so on) and= Mossad sayanim.

[tgun...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, September 28, 2014 8:14:13 PM UTC-4, tomnln wrote:

Go have a big glass of prune juice and then take a dump on your 26 volumes, you moron.
The real and only anti-Semites are the fake Jews/Khazars who call themselves Ashkenazis, who stole Palestine, irradiated thousands of real Jewish or Sephardi
children, and murdered at least five Kennedys.

[tom...@cox.net]

YOU WILL SINK WITH HE REST OF THE CRIMINALS COWARD 1 ! !
===========================================================================
====

[tgun...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, September 28, 2014 11:52:15 PM UTC-4, tomnln wrote:
> YOU WILL SINK WITH HE REST OF THE CRIMINALS COWARD 1 ! !
>
> ===========================================================================

Sounds like you overdosed on that prune juice. Was it kosher?

[tom...@cox.net]

Dave Reitzes <drei...@aol.com> wrote:
> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial

> fi= ndings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I
> argue = that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in
> misconceptions abo= ut the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and
> explain why it still matter= s today.
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the
> -s= keptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

===========================================================================
===== MY 50 YEARS OF STUDY SHOWS THAT WARREN REPORT BELIEVERS ARE THE ONES
WHO HAVE NEVER READ THE OFFICIAL EVIDENC/TESTIMONY AND CONSPIRACY
BELIEVERS HAVE INDEED READ THE OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY ! ! !
===========================================================================
=====

[Jason Burke]

On 10/20/2014 10:04 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> Dave Reitzes <drei...@aol.com> wrote:
>> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial
>> fi= ndings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I
>> argue = that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in
>> misconceptions abo= ut the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and
>> explain why it still matter= s today.
>>
>> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the
>> -s= keptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/
> ===========================================================================
> ===== MY 50 YEARS OF STUDY SHOWS THAT WARREN REPORT BELIEVERS ARE THE ONES
> WHO HAVE NEVER READ THE OFFICIAL EVIDENC/TESTIMONY AND CONSPIRACY
> BELIEVERS HAVE INDEED READ THE OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY ! ! !
> ===========================================================================
> =====
>

No, Rossfuck. Your 50 years of study shows that you are borderline
retarded. At best.

[tom...@cox.net]

===========================================================================
==== IS THERE A SPECIFIC PIECE OF EVIDENCE YOU WOULD CARE TO DEFEND ? ? ?
OR, ARE YOU COMPLETELY VOID OF THE WHOLE 888 PAGES OF BULLSHIT ? ? ? ? WERE
YIU TOO FUCKIG LAZY OR, STUPID TO EVEN READ THE WARREN REPORT
===========================================================================

[tom...@cox.net]

Jason Burke <Burke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 10:04 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > Dave Reitzes <drei...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly
> >> controversial fi= ndings. In this article I published last year in
> >> SKEPTIC magazine, I argue = that 50 years of conspiracy theories have
> >> been rooted in misconceptions abo= ut the evidence and fallacious
> >> reasoning -- and explain why it still matter= s today.
> >>

> >> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-
> >> the -s= keptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/
> > =======================================================================

> > ==== ===== MY 50 YEARS OF STUDY SHOWS THAT WARREN REPORT BELIEVERS ARE
> > THE ONES WHO HAVE NEVER READ THE OFFICIAL EVIDENC/TESTIMONY AND
> > CONSPIRACY BELIEVERS HAVE INDEED READ THE OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY !
> > ! !
> > =======================================================================
> > ==== =====
> >
>
> No, Rossfuck. Your 50 years of study shows that you are borderline
> retarded. At best.

===========================================================================
===== SURE YOU DUMB HILD MOLESTER. THAT'S WHY YOU SHIT YOUR PANTIES WHEN
THE IDEA OF DEBATING OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY IS PUT BEFORE YOY! ! !
===========================================================================

[Jason Burke]

A couple of weeks behind, I see, Rossshit.
Nurse-mommy having trouble getting the time reading to you? What with
cleaning up all your shit, piss, barf, and drool...

Besides, you dumb f*ck, you already responded to this. Or is that too
much for your coat-hangered brain to process?

And, oh, yes. Tsk, tsk for the libel...

[tom...@cox.net]

===========================================================================
===== WHAT IS "TRUE" IS "NOT" LIBELOUS ASSHOLE ! ! !
===========================================================================
===

[Jason Burke]

Uh, no, Rossfuck. I'm not a child molester. Though I see a few DO live
in your 'hood.
Do you like playing cards with them?

[tom...@cox.net]

===========================================================================
== YOU COME HIGHLY RECCOMENDED FROM AALL OF THEM SOMETHING ABOUT SAME
SORIRTY ! ! !
=========================================================================

[Jason Burke]

Damn, Rossfuck. Have nurse-mommy at least type for you, huh?

Hey, Shittard? What is AALL? Association of Asshole Labia Lickers? As in
all of Ellen's "friends"?

[tom...@cox.net]

===========================================================================
=== NO WONDER YOU NEVER ADDRESS OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY...THE "ONLY"
TIME YOU EVER DID, YOUR WRITINGS WERE AS FUCKED UP AS YOU AND YOUR WHOLE
FAMILY ARE ! ! !
===========================================================================
=====

[Jason Burke]

Oh, Tommie. You're still 0-for-life.

[gggg gggg]

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 at 7:09:55 PM UTC-7, Dave Reitzes wrote:
> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I argue that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in misconceptions about the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and explain why it still matters today.
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the-skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

[gggg gggg]

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 at 7:09:55 PM UTC-7, Dave Reitzes wrote:

> 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its endlessly controversial findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I argue that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in misconceptions about the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and explain why it still matters today.
>
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the-skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2013/11/21/john-kennedy-conspiracy-theories-assasination/3661891/

[Hank Sienzant]

On Sunday, July 3, 2022 at 4:02:09 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 at 7:09:55 PM UTC-7, Dave Reitzes wrote:

> > 50 years ago the Warren Commission published its about seven year ago. controversial findings. In this article I published last year in SKEPTIC magazine, I argue that 50 years of conspiracy theories have been rooted in misconceptions about the evidence and fallacious reasoning -- and explain why it still matters today.
> >
> > http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/jfk-conspiracy-theories-at-50-how-the-skeptics-got-it-wrong-and-why-it-matters/
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

G8 is responding to someone who last posted here about seven years ago.

Makes as much sense as anything any CT has said or done over the last 58 years.

[donald willis]

Oh, goodness! We're all crushed...

[Alan Johnstone]

In the intervening years has there been any movement within CTers to reach an agreed scenario of who participated in the conspiracy and how the conspiracy managed to be implemented?

Or have the 'theory' of CTers remained a collection of differing ideas and unverifiable individual hunches?

[Sky Throne 19efppp]

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 5:05:43 AM UTC-4, Alan Johnstone wrote:
> In the intervening years has there been any movement within CTers to reach an agreed scenario of who participated in the conspiracy and how the conspiracy managed to be implemented?
>
> Or have the 'theory' of CTers remained a collection of differing ideas and unverifiable individual hunches?

"A camel is a horse that was designed by a committee." The Nutter Socialist wants a committee of CTers to agree upon a scenario. That's what the Nutters have, a Nutter Camel designed by the Warren Commission. Why doesn't Alan study the evidence and see for himself? Maybe socialist really are lazy assclowns.